Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Faculty of Pharmacy
Transcript of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Faculty of Pharmacy
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Faculty of Pharmacy A Dissertation submitted for Pharm D degree
Entitle:
A Randomized controlled trial of effect of Co-Enzyme Q10 on Plasma Level
of Cardiac Troponin-I and Creatinine Kinase- MB in patients with
myocardial infarctions who undergo Angiplasty.
By:
Fatemeh Houshmand
Supervisors:
Dr. Taher Entezari Maleki
Dr. Naser Aslanabadi
Advisors:
Dr. Alireza Garjani
Dr. Samad Ghaffari
May 2015 Number of thesis: 3772
Clarification and Copyright Declaration
I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. I take full responsibility of
this work and declare that the results of this study are original and based on my
personal work. All scientific materials used in this thesis are fully referenced.
All rights are transferred to Faculty of pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical
sciences. The Faculty of pharmacy is authorized to lend or reproduce this thesis,
in total or in part.
Professor name : Dr. Taher Entezari Maleki
Signature:
Name: Fatemeh Houshmand Student No:
8813120463
Date: 2015.5.6
Signature:
Dedication:
I would like to dedicate this Doctoral dissertation to my parents whose words of
encouragement and push for tenacity ring in my ears. Thank you for your
unconditional support with my studies. I am honored to have you as my parents.
Thank you to give me a chance to prove and improve myself through all my walks
of life. Please do not ever change. I love you.
To my sisters, Azam and Akram and my brother, Mohammad who never left my
side and whose good examples have taught me to work hard for the things that I
aspire to achieve. Thank you for believing in me. Please do not ever doubt my
dedication and love for you.
I also dedicate this dissertation to my friends, Narges, Dena, Zahra, Arezoo,
Sanaz, Masoome, Mahdis, Mahtab and Fereshteh who assisted, advised, and
supported my research and writing efforts over the years. Your friendship makes
my life a wonderful experience. Thank you all for being my friends during these
years.
I would like to sincerely thank my supervisors, Dr. Entezari and Dr. Aslanabadi
and also my advisors Dr. Garjani and Dr. Gaffari for their guidance and support
throughout this study, and especially for their confidence in me.
My especial gratitude and appreciation to Dr. Taher Entezari Maleki, for the deft
ways in which lovingly challenged and supported me throughout the whole of this
work; knowing when to push and when to let up. I hope you find some kind of
satisfaction in this modest thesis. Thank you so much!
I
List of Abbreviations
ACC American College of Cardiology
ACCF American College of Cardiology Foundation
ACS Acute Coronary Syndrome
AHA American Heart Association
AMI Acute Myocardial Infarction
ATP Adenosine Tri Phosphate
CABG Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
CAD Coronary Artery Disease
CHF Congestive Heart Failure
CK-MB Creatinine Kinase-MB
CMP Cardiomyopathy
COPD Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
CoQ10 Coenzyme Q10
DM Diabetes Mellitus
ESC European Society of Cardiology
HMG-COA Hydroxymethylglutaryl-Coenzyme A
hs-CRP High Sensitivity C- reactive protein
HTN Hypertension
ICTRP International Clinical Trials Registry Platform
IHD Ischemic Heart Disease
II
LAD Left Anterior Descending
LCX Left Circumflex
LDL Low Density Lipoprotein
MACE Major Adverse Cardiac Effect
OM Obtuse Marginal artery
PCI Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
PDA Posterior Descending Artery
PMI Periprocedural Myocardial Injury
rANOVA repeated measures Analysis of Variance
RCA Right Coronary Artery
RCT RCT Randomized Controlled Trials
SBO Side Branch Occlusion
SD Standard Deviation
SVG Saphenous Venous Graft
ULN Upper Limit of Normal
WHF World Heart Federation
III
List of Contents
Abstract .................................................................................................................... 1
Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................ 3
1.1 Objectives & Hypothesis ................................................................................... 4
1.1.1 General objective ............................................................................................ 4
1.1.2 Specific Objectives ......................................................................................... 4
1.1.3 Applicational Objectives ...................................................................................... 4
1.2 Hypothesis or Questions .................................................................................... 4
Chapter 2: Literature Reviews ................................................................................. 5
2.1 Biochemistry and Physiology of Ubiquinone .................................................... 5
2.2 Sources .............................................................................................................. 7
2.3 Absorption and excretion of Coenzyme Q10 .................................................... 7
2.4 Deficiency of Coenzyme Q10 ........................................................................... 8
2.5 Cardiomyopathy ................................................................................................ 8
2.6 Myocardial Preservation and Intervention ........................................................ 9
2.7 Plasma lipoproteins ........................................................................................... 9
2.8 Statin Toxicity ................................................................................................. 10
2.9 Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction ............................................................. 11
2.9.1 Definition of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction ..................................... 11
2.9.2 Incidence ....................................................................................................... 12
2.10 Mechanisms of Periprocedural myocardial infarction and Risk Factors ....... 12
2.10.1 Mechanisms of the Relationship between PMI and long term Mortality ..... 13
IV
2.10.2 Prognostic Value of PMI .............................................................................. 13
2.11 Prevention of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction ....................................... 14
Chapter 3: Methods ............................................................................................... 16
3.1 Study design and setting .................................................................................. 16
3.2 Study population .............................................................................................. 17
3.3 Blood sampling ................................................................................................ 18
3.4 End points ........................................................................................................ 18
3.5 Statistical analysis ........................................................................................... 18
3.6 Power calculation ............................................................................................ 19
Chapter 4: Results .................................................................................................. 20
4.1 Demographic data ............................................................................................ 20
4.2 Risk Factors ..................................................................................................... 27
4.3 Drug History .................................................................................................... 28
4.4 Stented Target .................................................................................................. 29
4.5 CK-MB Results ............................................................................................... 30
4.6 Troponin I Results ........................................................................................... 32
4.7 hs-CRP Results ................................................................................................ 34
Chapter 5: Discussion and Conclusion .................................................................. 36
5.1 Discussion ........................................................................................................ 36
5.2 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 40
5.3 Limitations ....................................................................................................... 41
References ............................................................................................................. 42
V
List of Figures
Figure 2.1 Mevalonate pathway and terminal steps in the synthesis of CoQ.
............................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
Figure 4.1 Consort flow diagram of the study ...................................................... 21
Figure 4.2 Patients gender in both groups ............................................................ 23
Figure 4.3 Incidence of risk factors in both groups. ............................................. 24
Figure 4.4 Drug history of patients in both groups ............................................... 25
Figure 4.5 Target vessels of patients in both groups. ........................................... 26
Figure 4.6 Plasma levels of CK-MB in both groups ............................................ 31
Figure 4.7 Plasma levels of Troponin I in both groups ........................................ 33
Figure 4.8 Plasma levels of hs-CRP in both groups ............................................. 35
VI
List of Tables
Table 4.1 Demographic and Clinical data of the study patients ........................... 22
Table 4.2 The incidence of risk factors in the study groups ................................. 27
Table 4.3 Drug history of patients in both groups ................................................ 28
Table 4.4 Stented target vessels in the study groups ............................................ 29
Table 4.5 Mean CK-MB level at baseline, 8, and 24 h after PCI in the study
groups .................................................................................................................... 30
Table 4.6 Mean Troponin I level at baseline, 8, and 24 h after PCI in the study
groups .................................................................................................................... 32
Table 4.7 Mean hs-CRP level at baseline and 24 h after PCI in the study groups
............................................................................................................................... 34
Table 4.8 Incidence of MACE .............................................................................. 36
Abstract | P a g e 1
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the novel technical and medical improvement in performing
of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), some myocardial complications
occur during this procedure. Thus, periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI)
following PCI has received serious attention due to its notable relation to
mortality and morbidity. Therefore, cardioprotection during PCI is still a
worldwide need.
Aim: Concerning the potential clinical benefits of CoQ10, this trial was
performed to investigate the CoQ10 pretreatment benefits in reduction of PMI in
patients undergoing elective PCI.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial of 100 patients undergoing elective PCI
was designed. The intervention group (n=50) received 300 mg CoQ10 in a single
dose and the standard treatment 12 hours before PCI. But the control group (n=50)
had the standard treatment only. To evaluate the myocardial injury during PCI, the
levels of CK-MB and troponine-I were measured at baseline, 8 h, and 24 h after
PCI, and hs-CRP levels were measured at baseline and 24 h after PCI. Afterwards,
all patients were assessed for the major adverse cardiac effects in a 1-month
following up period.
Results: No significant changes in the CK-MB levels at 8 h (p=0.079) and 24 h
(p=0.242) following PCI were found in intervention group when compared with
the control group. In the same way, no significant changes in troponine-I at 8 h
(p=0.062) and 24 h (p=0.826) after PCI were observed. The results of hs-CRP
levels indicated significant changes at 24 h (p=0.031) after PCI.
Conclusions: Although the biomarker’s changes were not significant in
intervention group, there was a trend toward the potential benefits of CoQ10. On
the other hand, the changes of hs-CRP were statistically significant, that can
relatively support the potential cardioprotective effects of CoQ10 in the
prevention of PMI following PCI.
Abstract | P a g e 2
Keywords: Coenzyme Q10, Periprocedural myocardial injury, PCI, Cardiac
biomarkers, Creatine kinase-MB, Troponin-I, hs-CRP
Introduction
Introduction | P a g e 3
Ever since the resumption of percutaneous coronary Intervention (PCI), the
number of this procedure has increased all over the world due to its important role
in organizing ischemic heart Diseases (IHD) [1-3]. Despite the unprecedented
technical and medical progress in the PCI performance, it has been obvious that
some myocardial injury was related to this procedure [4]. Thus, periprocedural
myocardial injury (PMI) is the mortality-related complication of PCI by affecting
the early and late results of patients who undergo PCI [5]. In 2007, the “joint
ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial
Infarction” described a new definition of PMI during PCI(type 4a MI) as an
increase of cardiac biomarkers more than three times the 99th percentile upper
limit normal (ULN). As a result, the elevation between 1 and 3 times ULN was
supposed as PMI [6,7]. The probable occurrence of PMI was estimated to be one
third of all elective PCIs [8]. Given this fact, ACC/AHA guidelines have
considered this important issue and for assessing the outcomes, recommended
(class 2A) the check of cardiac biomarkers 8-12 h after PCI [7].
Different mechanisms are supposed to be involved in PMI development, such as
ischemic conditions, thrombosis formation, platelet activation, inflammation and
oxidative stress which must be planned to reduce these conditions in PCI [7].
Coenzyme Q10(ubiquinone), a natural content of human’s diet, which is also
synthesized in body cells from the amino acid tyrosine, has clinical benefits due to
its ability to improve ATP production, antioxidant activity and membrane
stabilizing properties [9-12].
Concerning the diversity of functions of coenzyme Q10 and the mechanisms of
PMI development, this study was designed to evaluate whether the pretreatment
with coenzyme Q10 could reduce the PMI in patients who are undergoing elective
PCI.
Introduction | P a g e 4
1.1 Objectives & Hypothesis
1.1.1 General Objective:
A Randomized controlled trial of CoEnzyme Q10 on Plasma Level of Cardiac
Troponin-I and Creatinine Kinase- MB in patients with myocardial infarctions
who undergo Angioplasty.
1.1.2 Specific Objectives:
1. Level of Cardiac Troponin-I, Creatinine Kinase- MB and High sensitivity C-
reactive protein before PCI.
2. Level of Cardiac Troponin-I, Creatinine Kinase- MB and High sensitivity C-
reactive protein after PCI.
3. Comparison of the mentioned groups.
1.1.3 Applicated Objectives:
Evaluation of CoQ10 effect on myocardial damage in patients undergoing
angiography.
1.2 Hypothesis or Questions:
Level of Cardiac Troponin-I, Creatinine Kinase- MB and hs-CRP in CoQ10 group
is less than control group.
Literature
Review
Literature Reviews | P a g e 5
Coenzyme Q10 (ubiquinone) is a natural content in human’s diet and is also
synthesized in all kinds of body cells especially the muscles. The synthesis of
ubiquinone in body cells from the amino acid tyrosine is a process with different
stages requiring at least eight vitamins and several phytochemicals [9-12]. The
deficiency of any of these micronutrients may result into ubiquinone deficit.
CoQ10 deficiency of the neurons, cardiomyocytes and arterial cells can interact in
predisposing circadian rhythm of cardiovascular events by causing disorder in the
suprachiasmatic nucleus, pituitary function and melatonin release from the pineal
gland of the brain [9-18].
2.1 Biochemistry and Physiology of Ubiquinone
The biosynthesis of ubiquinone are based on three main steps; the first step is the
synthesis of the ring structure from the essential amino acids tyrosine and
phenylalanine, the second step is the formation of the side chain called isoprenoid
from acetyl-CoA residues within the mevalonate pathway, and the third step is a
condensation of structures formed in previous steps by means of enzyme
polyprenyl-transferase, in the Golgi apparatus. It is also probable that one
essential step in regulating the synthesis seems to be the hydroxymethylglutaryl
(HMG)-coenzyme A reductase reaction, common with a step in cholesterol
synthesis, but other steps may also be regulated. (figure 2.1)
Ubiquinone has a strong influence on at least three mitochondrial enzymes
(complexes I, II and III) which are involved in the oxidative phosphorylation
pathway and are essential for the synthesis of ATP which is required for cell
function [10,11]. It may prevent cellular damage during myocardial ischemia and
reperfusion and the oxidation of LDL cholesterol and also inhibits atherosclerosis
and disruption of plaque.
Literature Reviews | P a g e 6
The ability to improve ATP production, anti-oxidant activity and membrane
stabilizing properties are some clinical benefits of CoQ10 in prevention and
treatment of heart diseases [9-12]. The anti-oxidant activity of Ubiquinone in
cooperation with vitamin E can be applied in the prevention of membrane and
plasma lipid damages [13]. Protection against Atherosclerosis can be offered by
activating smooth muscle cells in rich content of CoQ10, and by preventing the
formation of lipid peroxidation and low density lipoprotein cholesterol oxidation
[6,8].
Figure 2.1 The mevalonate pathway and the terminal steps in the synthesis of CoQ
Literature Reviews | P a g e 7
Ubiquinone might have the ability to preserve the integrity of myocardial calcium,
sodium and potassium channel during ischemic attacks. It might therefore
improve cellular integrity during ischemia by activating potassium channels the
same as Nicorandil and decreases cellular calcium due to channel modulation [17-
19].
2.2 Sources
CoQ exists in the plant and animal cells. Q9 is found in rats and mice. Q6, Q7,
and Q8 are plentiful in the yeast and bacteria. Ubiquinone is found in all tissues,
but it is rich in the heart and skeletal muscles, liver and kidneys. The lowest levels
of CoQ10 are found in the lungs. The reduced form of ubiquinone is the most
important form in all tissue cells except in the brain and lung tissues. The
ubiquinone level in the human plasma ranges between 0.75 to 1.0 ng/ml of which
75% is in the reduced form. The total content of ubiquinone in the body which is
found in the muscle has been estimated at 1.0-1.5 g. The reduction in ubiquinone
levels may lead to aging. The amount of ubiquinone may be elevated by
biosynthesis, from food and supplementation. The biosynthesis of ubiquinone
may be intensified by exercise. Some rich sources of ubiquinone are pork heart,
vegetables, fish, soya bean, particularly cauliflower and sweet potato. The dietary
intake of ubiquinone was estimated to be 3-5 mg/day and 2-3 mg/day in Denmark
and India, respectively. The dietary intake of 10-30mg/day may be enough for
healthy individuals. The plasma levels of ubiquinone are lower in South Asians in
comparison with Caucasians and Chinese [13].
2.3 Absorption and excretion of Coenzyme Q10
Ubiquinone absorption is slow from the gastrointestinal tract due to its lipid-
soluble nature. The mean plasma level following a single dose of 100 mg orally is
1.004 ± 0.37 ug/ml [9,10]. It is estimated that the mean steady state level after
three daily administrations of 100 mg is 5.4 ug/ml. The ubiquinone’s half-life in
plasma is 33.9 ± 5.32 hours due to its low clearance rate from the plasma. A large
portion of the exogenous administration of ubiquinone is deposited in the liver
Literature Reviews | P a g e 8
and stored as very low density lipoprotein. It is excreted via the biliary tract and
about 62.5% of the drug may be recovered in the stools. The drug is concentrated
in adrenal, spleen, lung, kidney, liver, brain and myocardial tissue during chronic
administration.
2.4 Deficiency of Coenzyme Q10
Insufficient dietary intake, impairment in CoQ10 biosynthesis and excessive
utilization by the body; or a combination of any three may lead to ubiquinone
deficiency [9-14]. A various diseases such as coronary artery disease, particularly
with angina pectoris, congestive heart failure, mitral valve prolapse, etc. may
increase the consumption of CoQ10 by body tissues. The poor body stores or low
dietary intake may predispose several diseases and ubiquinone supplementation
may have beneficial effects. The oxidative stress in the tissues may be increased
by some environmental oxidants like pollutants, pesticides, heavy metals,
industrial fumes, radiation and increased consumption of linoleic acid and
therefore enhance the ubiquinone requirement. The two-fold higher amount of
ubiquinone in vegetarians in comparison with the omnivores indicates that a high
intake of these foods may provide high CoQ10 levels (0.86 vs. 0.44 ug/ml) [9-12].
2.5 Cardiopymopathy
The cause or effect of ubiquinone deficiency in cardiomyopathy (CMP) has not
yet been verified [20,21]. In one study, the tissue levels of ubiquinone in NYHA
class IV subjects of CMP were significantly lower in comparison with class 1 and
2 subjects [12]. It was indicated that the best response to ubiquinone treatment
was due to the greater deficiency of it. In a randomized double blind study with
administration of CoQ10, notable improvement was observed in patients with
dilated CMP with class III and IV heart failure [22,23].
CoQ10 and hs-CRP are important markers to assess the oxidative stress and
inflammatory status of patients with CMP.
Literature Reviews | P a g e 9
2.6 Myocardial Preservation and Intervention
It was indicated that prior ubiquinone therapy contributes to protection against
ischemia-reperfusion [9-12]. In a rabbit heart model of ischemia and reperfusion,
the role of CoQ10 in protecting ischemic myocardium against both structural and
functional changes was observed. The CoQ10-pretreated animals were able to
retain oxidative phosphorylation and cellular ATP generating capacity, and
pretreatment with ubiquinone can prevent cellular and mitochondrial calcium
overload. The clinical and metabolic beneficial effects were considerably similar
to those observed with propranolol and verapamil [9]. It was demonstrated that
CoQ10 can protect both Calcium and Na-K dependent ATPase activity. In a
randomized study on humans the efficacy of ubiquinone in preventing low cardiac
output following cardiac surgery was examined. Judy et al. [24] studied
myocardial protection by CoQ10-pretreatment for 15 days before heart surgery
and compared with 30 days treatment after the surgery. The CoQ10 group
demonstrated optimal blood and tissue CoQ10 and tissue ATP levels, elevation in
cardiac pumping and ejection fraction and short recovery period compared to
placebo group.
2.7 Plasma lipoproteins
In one in vitro experiment, it has been shown that after exposure to free radical
source (Azo compounds), low density lipoproteins (LDL) deployed their
antioxidant reserve which were applied when inhibiting the oxidative attack.
When LDL, depleted of ascorbic acid, was exposed to free radical source,
peroxidation remained under control as long as some ubiquinol was present. The
findings suggested that the antioxidant activity of ubiquinone may be more
efficient than tocopherol and carotenoids in preventing the oxidation of LDL [14].
A double blind controlled-trialed study [14], in patients with hypercholesterolemia
indicated that the plasma level of CoQ10 in patients treated with HMG-COA
reductase inhibitor (lovastatin) was significantly lower than placebo group [25].
The same biosynthetic pathway of CoQ10 and cholesterol appears to be the cause
of CoQ10 reduction. These findings were confirmed in a crossover trial with
Literature Reviews | P a g e 10
CoQ10 and HMG-COA reductase inhibitors [26]. Singh et al. [27] showed that
lovastatin has a average antioxidant activity similar to fluvastatin. Despite a
decrease in CoQ10, induced by statins, oxidation of LDL is inhibited by the
statins without serious adverse effect of CoQ10 deficiency. However, co-
treatment of hypercholesterolemia with HMG-COA reductase inhibitors and
CoQ10 may make better results in the recovery of coronary atherosclerosis and
prevention of cardiac complications. In a study, it was demonstrated that CoQ10
treatment may significantly reduce lipoprotein level and plasma insulin levels in
patients with acute coronary syndrome [28,29].
2.8 Statin Toxicity
Statin induced myopathy has become an important complication in the western
world and also in developing countries [30,31]. The main predisposing reasons for
statin toxicity are high dose statin monotherapy, combination with other
medications such as cyclosporine, fibrates, macrolide antibiotics, certain
antifungal drugs and niacin. One of the most important factors for predicting risk
of myopathy is also the way of metabolization of statins. Most of them are
metabolized by cytochrome P 450 family with the exception of pravastatin [31].
CoQ10 is ubiquitous substance serving also like coenzyme in mitochondrial
phosphorylation. It also is synthesized by endogenous way from
mevalonateisoprene as well as the result of HMG-CoA reductase activity.
Therefore, the resduction of CoQ10 levels is reasonable during statin therapy due
to reduction and inhibition of LDL cholesterol synthesis. Hence, the significant
decrease of CoQ10 during statin therapy was observed (up to 40%) and myopathy
may occur due to subsequent disorder of mitochondrial energetic metabolism
[31,32].
Based on the recommendation of International College of Cardiology, possible
risks of widely prescribed statin therapy should be reduced by lower doses
administration, co-treatment with CoQ10 and avoidance of risky combinations of
drugs interfering with the metabolism via cytochrome P 450.The role of lipid
lowering diet plus exercise is incontestable and may support lower doses or even
Literature Reviews | P a g e 11
consumption of lipid lowering drugs. In a randomized, controlled, trial, the
adverse effects of statins in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in
two groups with CoQ10 (CoQ10, 120mg/day) +lovastatin (10-20mg/day) or
lovastatin alone were compared for one year [33]. Of 144patients, 49.3% of
CoQ10 group and 43.6% of control group were receiving lovastatin (10-
20mg/day). The results of adverse effects showed that fatigue (40.8 vs 6.8%,
P<0.01) was significantly more common in the control group compared to CoQ10
group indicating that CoQ10 may have beneficial effects in preventing lovastatin
adverse effects. In another study performed by Caso, after a 30-day intervention
by CoQ10 in the patients with statin induced myopathy, the pain severity and pain
interference with daily activities were significantly lower in patients received
CoQ10 Compared to those who were treated with vitamin E. In addition,
coenzyme Q10 supplementation may decrease muscle pain associated with statin
treatment and may offer an alternative to stopping treatment with these vital drugs
[34].
2.9 Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction
In the current era of antiplatelet therapy and routine stenting, acute ischemic
complications occurring following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)
have been reduced. However, the periprocedural increase in cardiac biomarkers
continues to occur in a substantial proportion of patients [35].
2.9.1 Definition of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction
The initially definition published in 2000 was any rise and fall in cardiac
biomarkers (creatine kinaseMB fraction [CK-MB] or troponin) above the upper
limit of normal (ULN) [36]. Later in 2007, the American College of Cardiology
(ACC) defined PCI-related myocardial infarction as an elevation of biomarkers
(CK-MB or troponin) greater than 3 times ULN, and the elevations of cardiac
biomarkers between 1 and 3 times ULN was concerned as indicative of
periprocedural myocardial necrosis [6]. An isolated elevation in troponin above 3
times ULN was considered enough to define PMI. An isolated elevation in cardiac
Literature Reviews | P a g e 12
biomarkers as opposed to the general definition of MI that includes the additional
presence of symptoms or electrocardiographic or imaging abnormalities
suggestive of ischemia is enough to define PMI. This definition applies for
patients with normal baseline biomarkers. Above documents cannot support the
diagnosis of PMI if the biomarkers value are abnormal or increase before PCI. If
the biomarkers’ values are stable or falling, recurrent infarction is diagnosed in
case of≥20% increase of a previously downward trending troponin or CK-MB
value [6].
2.9.2 Incidence
The incidence (3.6%–48.8%) and importance of myocardial injury after PCI
depends on the patient’s presentation (acute coronary syndrome [ACS] vs stable
coronary artery disease [CAD]), the angiographic and procedural characteristics,
the adjunctive pharmacotherapy, and the biomarker and thresholds applied to
detect its presence [37,38]. On average, 23% of patients have a rise in CK-MB
above ULN following PCI, and 27% of patients have an elevation in troponin I
[37]. The elevation of CK-MB to greater than 3 times ULN occurs after 6% to
18% of PCIs [8-10]. According to the ACC guidelines published in 2005, the
levels of CK-MB and troponin must be measured routinely, 8 to 12 hours after
PCI in all patients regardless of symptoms, for prognostic evaluation [41].
2.10 Mechanisms of Periprocedural MI and Risk Factors
Q-wave MI and large non–Q-wave MI are associated with angiographically
documented complications during PCI including flow-limiting dissection, abrupt
vessel closure that is not quickly treated, branch vessel occlusion, or macroscopic
embolization [37]. Most PMI are, however, diagnosed after apparently
uncomplicated PCIs. In these cases without clear evidence of angiographic
complications, intravascular ultrasound studies have demonstrated a close
relationship between the amount of atherosclerotic plaque burden and PMI,
indicating the significance of atheroembolization in the pathophysiology of PMI
[42]. In addition, microvascular thrombosis, platelet activation, microcirculatory
inflammation and oxidative stress, and no-reflow phenomenon occur due to
Literature Reviews | P a g e 13
release of prothrombotic bio factors into the coronary circulation following plaque
disruption [4]. Patients with multivessel disease, multiple or long lesions, or
diffusely diseased arteries have a larger atherosclerotic burden and are more
susceptible to PMI. Also, complex lesions requiring complex PCI predispose to
PMI [37]. Saphenous venous graft (SVG) lesions are at high risk of PMI as high
as 15%, associated with the raised incidence of micro- and macro-embolization,
particularly in grafts older than 3 years [44,45] This incidence is decreased by
∼50% with the consumption of embolic protection devices [44].
2.10.1 Mechanisms of the Relation Between PMI and Long-term
Mortality
The elevation of biomarkers following PCI shows some degree of myocardial
injury that has been confirmed by MRI findings [46]. These studies have
demonstrated that despite the use of preloaded clopidogrel and abciximab,
irreversible myocardial injury occurred in almost 30% of patients following
complex or multivessel PCI. There was a salient relation between the troponin I
raise following PCI and the magnitude of MRI-defined irreversible injury, which
suggests that troponin elevation in the setting of PCI, represents true myocardial
cell death, rather than troponin leak without cellular necrosis. This injury might
affect the function of left ventricular and cause arrhythmias. In fact, the risk of
PMI increases in patients with baseline LV systolic dysfunction or incomplete
revascularization [47]. In addition, the biomarkers elevation predicts extensive
and unstable atherosclerotic burden that predisposes to future ischemic events.
[49].
2.10.2 Prognostic Value of PMI
Prognostic Value of CK-MB Elevation:
In Stone et al. [40] study of 7147 patients, CK-MB raised greater than 3 times
ULN in 18% of patients, and Q-wave MI developed in 0.6% of patients. Another
study indicated that CK-MB elevation to greater than 10 times ULN is related to
Literature Reviews | P a g e 14
the increased risk of 3-year mortality [48]. Two meta-analysis proved that smaller
elevation of CK-MB was associated with an increased risk of death [49,8].
Prognostic Value of Troponin Elevation:
Several studies have addressed the prognostic value of periprocedural troponin
increase. One recent analysis from Cornell Angioplasty Registry indicated that
troponin I levels greater than 5 times ULN were independently related to a 1.8-
fold increase of long-term mortality [50]. Otherwise, several older studies do not
support the relation between troponin elevation after PCI and long-term mortality
[51,52]. Despite the guidelines for PMI definition, the prognostic value of
troponin elevation is less clear [6].
Prognostic Value of C-reactive protein:
Several studies indicated the association of elevated CRP levels with cardiac
events and also short-term and longterm morality risk not only for patients with
acute and chronic ischemic heart disease but also for those at risk for
atherosclerosis [54]. The Centers for Disease Control/AHA guidelines
demonstrate that low risk (< 1.0 mg/l), average risk (1–3 mg/l), and high risk (>
3.0 mg/l) is assigned to those patients with an intermediate 10-year CHD risk
[55].
2.11 Prevention of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction:
Antiplatelet Therapies:
In several trials including CREDO, PCI-CURE and ARMYDA-2, the effect of
Clopidogrel on reduction of cardiovascular events was confirmed [56,58].
Another studies like EPISTENT and ESPRIT trials indicated that glycoprotein
IIb/IIIa antagonists reduced the 30-day risk of MI by 50%, partly through a
reduction in PMI [39,59]. The combination of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists
Literature Reviews | P a g e 15
and clopidogrel further reduced the risk of MI, particularly PMI, in ISAR-REACT
2 trial [60].
Statin Therapy:
Several studies indicated the effect of atorvastatin on reduction of PMI [61-63]. It
seems that a single high dose of statin reduces PMI by different mechanisms,
including modification of inflammatory responses, plaque stability, and inhibiting
thrombus formation.
Mechanical Approaches:
In SVG interventions, distal embolic protection devices decrease PMI and 30-day
MI rate by ∼50%, with a trend toward lower 30-day mortality (1.0% vs 2.3% in
one trial, P=0.17) [44]. However, these devices were not useful in acute MI
related to native coronary disease [64]; thus, their only coronary application is
currently in SVG interventions. Proximal embolic protection might further reduce
the incidence of MI in SVG interventions [65].
Ischemic Preconditioning:
Ischemic preconditioning can make local protection and might have a salutary
effect on ischemia-reperfusion injury of remote tissues [66]. In fact, ischemic
preconditioning reduces troponin release following PCI and in major adverse
cardiac events at 6 months [67]. Although additional studies are needed to
evaluate the value of ischemic and remote ischemic preconditioning, the available
data suggest a beneficial effect of these strategies.
Methods
Methods | P a g e 16
3.1 Study design and setting
This was a pilot, prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial, which
was conducted in Shahid Madani Heart Center (the largest referral hospital for
cardiovascular disorders at the northwest of Iran), affiliated to the Tabriz
University of Medical Sciences(TBZMED) from August 2014 to October 2014. It
was approved in the ethical committee of the university and then was registered in
the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) with identifier
IRCT201311278307N3.
Methods | P a g e 17
3.2 Study population
In this study all consented patients suffering ischemic heart disease with the age
between 18 and 80 years old who were undergoing elective PCI (angioplasty and
stent insertion) were entered. Exclusion criteria of the study were: elevation of
CK-MB and troponin-I before PCI, history of previous and acute MI, history of
coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) during the last 3 months, unsuccessful PCI,
patients with renal dysfunction (serum creatinine above 2.5 mg/dl), patients who
are undergoing dialysis, patients with cardiogenic shock, pregnant women,
unconsented patients, patients with inability in filling and understanding the
consent form and those patients who wanted to discontinue the study at any time.
The demographic data of patients, including sex, age, weight, height, drug history
(DH), and clinical data including past medical history (PMH), laboratory data and
positive family history of CVD were recorded in a data collecting form.
All patients undergoing elective PCI were randomized by the permuted block
randomization procedure into CoQ10-treated group (n=50) or the control group
(n=50). All patients were admitted a day before elective PCI. CoQ10 (100 mg
tablet, generic dosage form) was given as 300 mg orally in a single dose 12 hours
before PCI. Both groups received the standard pretreatment protocol of PCI,
including aspirin 325 mg, clopidogrel 300 mg, weight-adjusted intravenous
heparin with a target activated clotting time of 250–350 s and also received drug-
eluted stent. The same interventional cardiologists conducted all PCIs with the
standard method. All patients were assessed in a 1-month follow up for the major
adverse cardiac effect (MACE) including death, Q wave MI, target vessel
revascularization and ischemic stroke.
Methods | P a g e 18
3.3 Blood sampling
The CK-MB and troponin-I levels were measured at the baseline as well as 8 and
24 h after PCI in two groups. hs-CRP was also measured at the baseline and after
PCI. Detection limits for blood levels of CK-MB, troponin-I were 1 ng/ml and 0.1
ng/ml, respectively.
3.4 End point outcomes
The primary outcome of this study included the comparison of CK-MB and
troponin-I levels at baseline, 8, and 24 h after PCI and also the comparison of hs-
CRP before and after PCI in two groups. The secondary outcome was regarded as
an incidence of MACE (death, Q wave MI, target vessel revascularization,
ischemic stroke) during 1 month following PCI.
3.5 Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed by SPSS 16.0 software (Chicago, SPSS Inc., 2007).
Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was done to identify if the data had a normal
distribution. For assessing between- and within-subject interactions, the repeated
measures analysis of variance (rANOVA) was performed. Bonferroni adjustment
was conducted for pair wise comparisons. Paired t-test (for normal data),
Wilcoxon, Mann–Whitney and independent sample t-tests were applied to
compare the means within the groups. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were
applied to perform the frequency analysis. Continuous data were shown as
means± standard deviation (SD). The p values less than 0.05 were reputed as the
statistically significant.
Methods | P a g e 19
3.6 Study power calculation
The observed power for CK-MB and troponin-I were 0.805 and 0.986,
respectively based on repeated measures ANOVA analysis SPSS. The power
calculation with the sample size of 100, tw0 equal groups, three times of
measurements, and α = 0.05 using G*power 3.1.9.2 were as follows: for CK-MB
with partial eta-square = 0.055 and calculated effect size (F) = 0.241, the power
(1- βerror) was calculated 0.999. Accordingly, the power for troponin-I regarding
the partial eta-square = 0.117 and calculated effect size (F) = 0.364 was calculated
1.0.
Results
Results | P a g e 20
4.1 Demographic data
A total number of 118 patients took part in this study. Among these, 18 patients
were excluded due to elevation of CK-MB/ Troponin I (n=10) 48 hours before
PCI; history of CABG during last three months (n=6) and renal dysfunction (n=2).
At last, 100 patients (control=50 and intervention=50) were included in the study
and their data entered in to the final analysis (Figure 4.1).
Results | P a g e 21
Figure 4.1 consort flow diagram of the study
Assessed for eligibility (n=118)
Excluded (n=18)
Randomized
(n=100)
Allocation
Allocated to non-
intervention (n=50)
Received standard
treatment + angioplasty
Allocated to
intervention (n=50)
Received 300 mg
C0Q10 + standard
treatment + angioplasty
Follow-up
and analysis
Followed up and
analysis (n=50)
Received drug-eluted
stent (n=50)
Followed up and
analysis (n=50)
Received drug-eluted
stent (n=50)
Results | P a g e 22
More than half of the patients were men (60 % in control and 56 % in intervention
group). The mean±SD for age were 59.4 ±11.3 and 59.8±10.12 in the control and
intervention group, respectively. Demographic and clinical data of the study
groups are shown in Table 4.11.
Table 4.1 Demographic and clinical data of the study patients
Demographic/Clinical data
of patients
Intervention
(n=50)
Control
(n=50)
P value
Age (years), mean±SD 59.8±10.12 59.4±11.3 0.860
Male sex,n(%) 28(56) 30(60) 0.685
Weight (kg), mean±SD 75.9±13.4 78.7±11.3 0.263
Height (cm), mean±SD 164.8±10.5 166.2±22.8 0.711
), mean±SD2(kg/mBody Mass Index 28±5 27.4±3.5 0.470
Serum creatinine (mg/dl), mean±SD 1.1±0.2 1.2±0.22 0.005
Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dl), mean±SD 15.3±4.4 18.4±5.5 0.003
Fasting blood sugar (mg/dl), mean±SD 103.4±22.6 103.3±39.5 0.991
Hemoglobin (g/dl), mean±SD 13.3±1.5 13.3±1.1 0.947
Triglyceride (mg/dl), mean±SD 211.6±107.2 187.3±78.7 0.207
Cholesterol (mg/dl), mean±SD 186.6±46.6 177±38.5 0.264
Low Density Lipoprotein (mg/dl),
mean±SD
110.2±29.7 117.8±28.3 0.217
High Density Lipoprotein (mg/dl),
mean±SD
40±7.3 38.1±5.5 0.140
Results | P a g e 23
Figure 4.2 Patients gender in both groups
Results | P a g e 24
Results | P a g e 25
Results | P a g e 26
Results | P a g e 27
4.2 Risk Factors
The most important risk factors in patients of both groups were Hypertension and
positive family history for cardiovascular diseases.
Risk factors in patients Intervention
(n=50)
Control
(n=50)
P value
Ejection fraction (%), mean±SD 49.7±7.2 49.9±8.7 0.932
Smoking, n(%) 20(40) 27(54) 0.161
Opium, n(%) 1(2) 1(2) 1
Alcohol, n(%) 0(0) 2(4) 0.495
Diabetes mellitus, n(%) 14(28) 15(30) 1
Hypertension, n(%) 36(72) 37(74) 1
Hyperlipidemia, n(%) 16(32) 8(16) 0.061
Congestive heart failure, n(%) 3(6) 1(2) 0.618
Chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease, n(%)
1(2) 0(0) 1
Other past medical history, n(%) 8(16) 8(16) 1
Positive family history for
cardiovascular diseases, n(%)
31(62) 28(56) 0.542
Previous bypass surgery, n(%) 1(2) 0(0) 1
Previous coronary intervention, n(%) 2(4) 0(0) 0.495
Table 4.2 The incidence of risk factors of the study groups
Results | P a g e 28
4.3 Drug History
The most drugs used by patients belonged to cardiovascular agents.
Drug history of patients Intervention
(n=50)
Control
(n=50)
P value
Cardiovascular drug history, n(%) 35(70) 30(60) 0.295
Anti-diabetic drug history, n(%) 13(26) 12(24) 0.817
Anti-lipid drug history, n(%) 18(36) 10(20) 0.075
Psychiatric drug history, n(%) 1(2) 2(4) 1
Other drug history, n(%) 5(10) 2(4) 0.436
Table4.3 Drug history of patients of both groups
Results | P a g e 29
4.4 Stented Target
All participants were deployed with drug-eluted stents. The stented target vessels
of the patients were shown in Table 4.4.
The most stented vessels are LAD and RCA.
Table 4.4 Stented target vessels in the study groups
Target vessel Intervention
(N=50)
Control
(N=50)
P value
LAD, n(%) 17(34) 19(38) 0.677
LCX, n(%) 7(14) 3(6) 0.182
OM, n(%) 4(8) 4(8) 1
RCA, n(%) 8(16) 12(24) 0.317
PDA, n(%) 1(2) 1(2) 1
LAD+LCX, n(%) 1(2) 0(0) 1
LAD+OM, n(%) 4(8) 1(2) 0.362
LAD+RCA, n(%) 2(4) 4(8) 0.678
LCX+OM, n(%) 1(2) 1(2) 1
OM+RCA, n(%) 1(2) 1(2) 1
RCA+PDA, n(%) 2(4) 0(0) 0.495
RCA+LAD+LCX, n(%) 1(2) 0(0) 1
LAD+RCA+PDA, n(%) 0(0) 1(2) 1
other, n(%) 1(2) 3(6) 0.617
Results | P a g e 30
4.5 CK-MB Results
The baseline level of CK-MB (p=0.184) was not different in both control and
intervention groups. No significant differences in CK-MB levels 8 h (p=0.079)
and 24 h (p=0.242) after PCI were observed in CoQ10 group in comparison at the
control group. The delta mean for changes of CK-MB between baseline and 8 h
after PCI (p=0.760), baseline and 24 h after PCI (p=0.803) and 8 h and 24 h after
PCI (p=0.456) was not significantly different between the two groups (Table 4.5).
Table 4.5 Mean CK-MB level at baseline, 8, and 24 h after PCI in the study groups.
CK-MB levels Intervention
(n=50)
Control
(n=50)
P value
Baseline 20.5±4.1 23±8.6 0.184
At 8 h 23.6±10.9 27.6±18.9 0.079
At 24 h 24.9±13.3 26.7±13.4 0.242
Baseline—8h -3.1±10 -4±20.2 0.760
Baseline—24 h -4.4±13.5 -3.7±13.2 0.803
8–24 h -1.3±9.8 0.35±12 0.456
Results | P a g e 31
Figure 4.6 The plasma levels of CK-MB in both groups.
Results | P a g e 32
4.6 Troponin I Results
The baseline level of troponine-I in both control and intervention groups was not
statistically different (p=1.44). There was no significant differences in troponine-I
level at 8 h (p=0.062) and 24 h (p=0.826) after PCI in control group when
compared with the CoQ10 treated group. In addition, the delta means of
troponine-I changes between baseline and 8 h after PCI (p=0.881), baseline and
24 h after PCI (p=0.461), 8 h and 24 h after PCI (p=1) were not significantly
different between the two groups (Table 4.6).
Table 4.6 Mean troponin I level at baseline, 8, and 24 h after PCI in the study groups.
Troponin I levels Intervention
(n=50)
Control
(n=50)
P value
Baseline 0.12±0.06 0.2±0.46 1.44
At 8 h 0.2±0.38 0.29±0.47 0.062
At 24 h 0.38±0.6 0.38±0.6 0.826
Baseline—8h -0.08±0.38 -0.09±0.41 0.881
Baseline—24 h -0.25±0.6 -0.17±0.46 0.461
8–24 h -0.17±0.38 -0.17±0.46 1
Results | P a g e 33
Figure 4.7 The plasma levels of Troponin I in both groups.
Results | P a g e 34
4.7 hs-CRP Results
The baseline hs-CRP level in both groups was statistically different (p=0.004).
Significant difference was also observed in hs-CRP levels at 24 h after PCI in
both groups (p=0.031). In addition, the delta means for changes of hs-CRP
between baseline and 24 h after PCI (p=0.0001) were statistically different
between the two proups (Table 4.7).
Table 4.7 Mean hs-CRP level at baseline and 24 h after PCI in the study groups.
hs-CRP levels Intervention
(n=50)
Control
(n=50)
P value
Baseline 7.6±6.9 5.4±5.6 0.004
At 24 h 6.4±5.6 9.4±7.8 0.031
Baseline—24 h 1.2±3.3 -3.75±4.3 0.0001
Results | P a g e 35
Figure 4.8 The plasma levels of hs-CRP in both groups.
Results | P a g e 36
4.8 MACE reports
The incidence of MACE was recorded during four-month period. Chest pain was
reported in two patient of control group and two in intervention group. Pacemaker
implantation was reported in one patient of intervention group after 2 month.
Angiography procedure was done in one patient of intervention group two months
after PCI. One of the patients of control group died after 4 month (Table 4.8).
Table 4.8 The incidence of MACE.
Event Intervention
(n=50)
Control
(n=50)
P Value
Chest Pain, (n%) 2(4%) 2(4%) 1
Pace-Maker implantation, (n%) 1(2%) 0(0%) 1
Angiography, (n%) 1(2%) 0(0%) 1
Death, (n%) 0(0%) 1(2%) 1
Discussion
And
Conclusion
Discussion | P a g e 37
5.1 Discussion
What is new in the present study is that this randomized controlled trial was the
first investigation that evaluated the effect of CoQ10 in the prevention of PMI in
patients who undergo elective PCI. This study could not confirm the potential
benefits of CoQ10 in the prevention of PMI in the setting of elective PCI based on
the cardiac biomarkers (CK-MB and troponine-I) changes. However, the results of
hs-CRP evaluation as a marker of inflammation can support the hypothesis of
preventing the PMI in the setting of elective PCI.
According to the new definition proffered on 2007, the incidence of PCI related
MI was 14.5% [8]. The cardiac biomarkers elevation following PCI was reported
31% and 28-32.9% for CK-MB and troponines, respectively [8, 68,69]. Several
meta-analysis studies have elucidated the prognostic significance of cardiac
biomarkers elevation following PCI [8, 68-71]. For instance, in the meta-analysis
including 11 randomized controlled trials with 23,230 patients, the elevation of 1-
3, 3-5 and >5 fold of CK-MB level after PCI, predicted the increased risk of
mortality by 1.5, 1.8 and 3.1 fold, respectively [8]. Also, in some meta-analysis, it
has been clarified that there is an important relationship between the elevation of
CK-MB after PCI and 6-month mortality [70,71]. In another meta-analysis study
of 20 RCTs, including 15,581 patients, the elevation of cardiac troponins after
PCI was clearly related to the increased mortality rate (4.4 vs. 3.3%, p=0.001; OR
1.35) [69].
More than 15 prospectively conducted clinical trials have demonstrated that CRP
is related to the early and late outcomes of patient with acute and chronic ischemic
heart disease and also for those patients at risk for atherosclerosis [54].
PMI is classified into two types (proximal and distal) based on its mechanisms.
The first type or proximal happens due to side branch occlusion (SBO) during
stent replacement or balloon inflation. The second type or distal which has several
mechanisms, is responsible for 50-75% of all PMIs. The thrombotic components
during angioplasty and distal embolization of thrombotic plaque, activation of
Discussion | P a g e 38
coagulation factors which lead to platelet activation and thrombosis formation,
activation of neurohormonal system and coronary vasospasm, the oxidative stress
as a result of the increased amount of some biomarkers like isoprostane-PGF2α
and ischemic-modified albumin, and at last, inflammation which is identified by
elevation of some biomarkers like IL-6 and CRP during angioplasty, are
mechanisms involved in the development of second type [7].
According to the mechanistic basis of PMI, several investigators have studied the
advantages of some medications as a cardio-protective agent in the prevention of
PMI [72-79]. The effect of atorvastatin in the prevention of PMI in patients who
undergo elective PCI have been studied in ARMYDA and NAPLES trials [72,73].
Correspondingly, the beneficial effect of statins on reduction of PMI in the setting
of urgent PCI has been proved in ARMYDA-RECTATURE (reloading of
atorvastatin before PCI), ARMYDA-ACS (loading of atorvastatin) and Yun et al.
(loading of rosuvastatin) trials [62,63,74]. Also, in Merla et al’s meta-analysis on
9 trials, including 4751 patients, the effect of pretreatment with statin in the
prevention of PMI has been elucidated. The incidence of PMI in statin-treated
group and non-statin group was reported 9% and 17.5%, respectively [75].
Furthermore, a large number of studies illustrated the potential role of
propranolol, adenosine, omega-3 and cyclosporine in the prevention of PMI [76-
79].
According to the Piot et al. (pretreatment cyclosporine) [79], Froughinia et al.
(pretreatment omega-3) [78], and Yun et al. (loading of rosuvastatin) [74] studies,
the changes of troponins were not statistically significant which is in agreement
with our study’s results. On the other hand, in these studies CK-MB levels
increased significantly in control groups in comparison with the intervention
groups. Although in the present study, pretreatment with CoQ10 could not
meaningfully decrease CK-MB and troponin-I levels 8h and 24 h after PCI there
was a trend toward the potential benefit of CoQ10. However, in Wang et al’s
study, cosupplementation with vitamin E plus CoQ10 had anti-inflammatory
Discussion | P a g e 39
effects against vascular diseases as judged by CRP concentration (p=0.019) that is
in agreement with our study results[80].
It has been shown that ubiquinone (CoQ10) has a strong influence on at least three
mitochondrial enzymes, which are involved in the oxidative phosphorylation
pathway, and hence, is useful for ATP synthesis required for cell function [10,11].
The ability to improve ATP production, antioxidant activity and membrane
stabilizing properties are some clinical benefits of CoQ10 in prevention and
treatment of heart diseases [9-12]. The antioxidant activity of ubiquinone in
cooperation with vitamin E can be utilized in the prevention of membrane and
plasma lipid damages [13]. The antioxidant, membrane stabilizing characteristics
and free radical scavenging properties of ubiquinone provides protection to
ischemic myocardium by restraining LDL oxidation [9-11]. Protection against
atherosclerosis can be offered by activating smooth muscle cells in rich content of
CoQ10, and by preventing the formation of lipid peroxidation and LDL oxidation
[14-16]. Ubiquinone might have the ability to preserve the integrity of myocardial
calcium, sodium and potassium channels during ischemic attacks. It might
therefore improve cellular integrity during ischemia by activating potassium
channels, in the same way as nicorandil, and decreases cellular calcium due to
channel [17-19].
According to the experimental and clinical benefits of CoQ10 in the treatment of
cardiovascular diseases, with regard to the cost and safety issues, this study was
designed to investigate the CoQ10 benefits in prevention of PMI following PCI.
The result of this study can be justified by some explanations. First, regarding to
the lack of the same studies, the exact timing and dosing of CoQ10 pretreatment
in the prevention of PMI following PCI was not distinguished. Hence, it is
suggested to conduct the same investigations to identify the exact timing and
dosing of CoQ10 in the prevention of PMI following PCI. The longer period and
larger loading doses of CoQ10 pretreatment may lead to the better results.
Secondly, it was a pilot study with small sample size, which could indicate the
Discussion | P a g e 40
non-significant results of the study. Besides, it is obvious that the potential
benefits of CoQ10 would be more evident in large-scale trials. And the third
reason that could affect the result of the study was the probable disparity between
the detection limits of kits. In addition, according to cardiac biomarker’s changes
(CK-MB and troponine), this study failed to support the potential benefits of
CoQ10 in PMI prevention. But the results of hs-CRP evaluation as a marker of
inflammation confirmed the study hypothesis.
Discussion | P a g e 41
5.2 Conclusion
Concerning the diversity of CoQ10’s functions and the mechanisms involved in
the development of PMI following PCI, the study was designed to evaluate the
potential cardioprotective benefits of CoQ10 in the reduction of PMI following
elective PCI. Although the biomarkers changes were not significant in
intervention group which could not confirm our hypothesis, the trend was toward
the potential benefits of CoQ10. On the other hand, the changes of hs-CRP were
statistically significant that can relatively support the potential cardioprotective
effects of CoQ10 in the prevention of PMI following PCI. Thus, the large scale
and long-term trials are required to clarify the potential benefits of CoQ10 in the
prevention of PMI following elective PCI.
Discussion | P a g e 42
5.3 Limitations
There are some limitations to this randomized controlled trial. First, this study was
a single-blind trial. Second, our research had a relatively small sample size and
also we had time and cost restrictions. Thus, the large long-term randomized trials
are required to be conducted to confirm the study’s hypothesis.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Cardiovascular Research Center and Shahid Madani
Heart Center of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences for support of the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no any conflict of interest about this work.
Founding
None.
References
References |P a g e 43
References
1. Cook S, Walker A, Hugli O, Togni M, Meier B. (2007). Percutaneous coronary
interventions in Europe: prevalence, numerical estim ates, and projections based
on data up to 2004. Clin Res Cardiol, 96(6), 375–382.
2. Moschovitis A, Cook S, Meier B. (2010). Percutaneous coronary interventions
in Europe in 2006. Euro Intervention 6(2), 189–194.
3. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Flegal K,
& Hong Y. (2009). Heart disease and stroke statistics—2009 update a report from
the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics
Subcommittee. Circulation, 119(3), e21-e181.
4. Popma JJ, Kuntz RE, Baim DS. (2002). A decade of improvement in the
clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary
artery disease. Circulation, 106(13), 1592–1594.
5. Bhatt DL, Topol EJ, CUTLIP DE, & KUNTZ RE. (2005). Does creatinine
kinase-MB elevation after percutaneous coronary intervention predict outcomes in
2005? Authors' reply. Circulation, 112(6), 906-923.
6. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD. (2007). Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/ WHF Task
Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Universal definition of
myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 50(22), 2173–2195.
7. Babu GG, Walker JM, Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. (2011). Periprocedural
myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention: an important target
for cardioprotection. Eur Heart J, 32(1), 23–31.
8. Ioannidis JP, Karvouni E, Katritsis DG. (2003). Mortality risk conferred by
small elevations of creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme after percutaneous coronary
intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol, 42(8), 1406–1411.
References |P a g e 44
9. Singh RB, Niaz MA, Rastogi V, Rastogi SS. (1998). Coenzyme Q in
cardiovascular disease. J Assoc Physicians India, 46(3), 299-306.
10. Singh RB, Pella D, Chopra R, Cornelissen G, Halberg F. (2003). Overview
of ubiquinone, in memory of a champion. Bliznakov EG, Ed. J Nutr Environ
Med, 13(4), 211-4.
11. Frankish H. (2003). Coenzyme Q10 could slow functional decline in
Parkinsons disease. Lancet, 360(9341), 1227.
12. Overvad K, Diamant B, Holm L, Holmer G, Mortensen SA, Stender S. (1999).
Coenzyme Q10 in health and disease. Eur J Clin Nutr, 53(10), 764-70.
13. Singh RB, Kartik C, Otsuka K, Pella D, Pella J. (2002). Brain-heart
connection and the risk of heart attack. Biomed Pharmacother., 56, 257-265.
14. Stocker R, Bowry WE, Frei B. (1991). Ubiquionol - 10 protects human low
density lipoprotein more efficiently against lipid peroxidation than does alpha-
tocopherol. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 88(5), 1646-50.
15. Bliznakov EG, Wilkins DJ. (1998). Biochemical and clinical consequences
of inhibiting coenzyme Q10 biosynthesis by lipid lowering HMGCoA reductase
inhibitors(statins):a critical review. Adv Ther, 15(4), 218-26.
16. Mohr D, Bowry VW, Stocker R. (1992). Dietary supplementation with
CoQ10 results in increased levels of ubiquionol-10 within circulating lipoproteins
and increased resistance of human low density lipoprotein to the initiation of lipid
peroxidation. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1126(3) 247-54.
17. Esconde D, Cavero I. (1992). Potassiumchannel openers: moving towards
cardioprotection via strengthening of a natural mechanism. Trends Pharmacol
Sci, 13, 269-72.
18. Singh RB, Rastogi SS, Moshiri M. (1999). CoQ10 and its role in heart
disease. J Clin Biochem Nutr, 26(2) 109-18.
References |P a g e 45
19. Singh RB, Kartikey K, Charu AS, Niaz MA, Schaffer S. (2003). Effect of
taurine and coenzyme Q10 in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Adv Exp
Med Biol, 526, 41-8.
20. Fedacko J, Pella D, Fedackova P, Vargova V, De Meester F, Durcikova P,
Singh RB. (2011). Coenzyme Q10 in heart and brain diseases. Open Nutra J, 4,
69-87.
21. Wilson MF, Frishman WH, Giles T, Sethi G, Greenberg SM, Brackett DJ.
(1991). CoQ10 therapy and exercise duration in stable angina. Biomedical and
clinical aspects of coenzyme Q. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 6, 339-48.
22. Langsjoen, P. H., Vadhanavikit, S., & Folkers, K. (1984). Effective treatment
with coenzyme Q10 of patients with chronic myocardial disease. Mol Aspect
Med, 11(8), 577-579.
23. Keogh A, Fenton S, Leslie C, Aboyoun C, Macdonald P, Zhao Y. (2003).
Randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of coenzyme Q, therapy in
class II and III systolic heart failure. Heart Lung Circ, 12(3), 135-41.
24. Judy Wr, Hall JH, Toth PD, Folkers K, Yamamura Y. (1986). Double blind,
crossover study of coenzyme Q10 in heart failure. Biomedical and Clinical
Aspects of CoQ10. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 5, 315-23.
25. Ghirlanda G, Oradei A, Manto A, Lippa S, Uccioli L, Caputo S. (1993).
Evidence of plasma CoQ10 lowering effect by HMGCOA reductase inhibitors, a
double blind placebo controlled trial. J Clin Pharmacol, 33(3), 226-9.
26. Bargossi AM, Battino M, Gaddi A, Fiorella PL, Grossi G, Barozzi G. (1994).
Exogenous CoQ10 preserves plasma ubiquinone levels in patients treated with 3-
hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. Int J Clin Lab Res,
24(3), 171-6.
References |P a g e 46
27. Singh RB, Singh NK, Rastogi SS, Wander GS., Aslam M, Onouchi Z. (1997).
Antioxidant effects of lovastatin and vitamin E on experimental atherosclerosis in
rabbits. Cardiovasc Drug Ther, 11(4), 575-80.
28. Singh RB, Chopra RK, Niaz MA, Kapoor R. (1999). Serum concentration of
lipoprotein(a) decreases on treatment with hydrosoluble CoQ10 in patients with
acute coronary artery disease. Discovery of a new role. Int J Cardiol, 68(1), 23-
29.
29. Singh RB, Niaz MA, Rastogi SS, Shukla PK, Thakur AS. (1999). Effect of
hydrosoluble CoQ10 on blood pressures and insulin resistance in hypertensive
patients with coronary artery disease. J Hum Hypertens, 13(3), 203-8.
30. Rundek T, Naini A, Sacco R, Coates K, DiMauro S. (2004). Atorvastatin
decreases coenzyme Q10 level in the blood of patients at risk for cardiovascular
diseases and stroke. Arch Neurol, 61(6), 889-92.
31. Koumis T, Nathan JP, Rosenberg JM, Cicero LA. (2004). Stretegies for the
prevention and treatment of statin-induced myopathy:is there a role for
ubiquinone supplementation. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 61(5), 515-19.
32. Chiang CE, Pella D, Singh RB. (2004). Coenzyme Q10 and adverse effects
of statins. J Nutr Environ Med, 14(1), 17-28.
33. Singh RB, Neki NS, Kartikey K, Pella D, Kumar A, Niaz, M A. (2003).
Effect of coenzyme Q10 on risk of atherosclerosis in patients with recent
myocardial infarction. Mol Cell Biochem, 246(1-2), 75-82.
34. Caso G, Kelly P, McNurlan MA, Lawson WE. (2007). Effect of coenzyme
q10 on myopathic symptoms in patients treated with statins. Am J Cardiol,
99(10), 1409-12.
35. Elias B, Hanna TA, Hennebry MB. (2010). Periprocedural Myocardial
Infarction:Review and Classification. Clinical Cardiol, 33(8), 476–483.
References |P a g e 47
36. Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E , Bassand JP, Klein W, Ohman M. (2000).
Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of The Joint European
Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the
redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 36(3)959–969.
37. Herrmann J. (2005). Peri-procedural myocardial injury: 2005 update. Eur
Heart J, 26(23), 2493–2519.
38. Prasad A, Gersh BJ, Bertrand ME, et al. (2009). Prognostic significance of
periprocedural versus spontaneously occurring myocardial infarction after
percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes. An
analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage
Strategy) trial.J Am Coll Cardiol, 54(5), 477–486.
39. Topol EJ, The EPISTENT Investigators. (1998). Randomised placebo-
controlled and balloon angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary
stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade. Lancet, 352(9122),
87–92.
40. Stone GW, Mehran R, Dangas G, Lansky AJ, Kornowski R, Leon. (2001).
Differential impact on survival of electrocardiographic Q-wave versus enzymatic
myocardial infarction after percutaneous intervention: a devicespecific analysis of
7147 patients.Circulation, 104(6), 642–647.
41. Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Jacobs AK, Kern MJ, King SB, et
al. (2006(. ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline update for percutaneous coronary
intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart
Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol, 47(1), e1-
e121.
42. Mehran R, Dangas G, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Pichard AD, Satler LF, et al.
(2000). Atherosclerotic plaque burden and CK-MB enzyme elevation after
coronary interventions: intravascular ultrasound study of 2256 patients.
Circulation, 101(6), 604–610.
References |P a g e 48
43. Mallat Z, Hugel B, Ohan J, Lesèche G, Freyssinet JM, Tedgui A. (1999).
Shed membrane microparticles with procoagulant potential in human
atherosclerotic plaques: a role for apoptosis in plaque thrombogenicity.
Circulation, 99(3), 348–353.
44. Baim DS, Wahr D, George B, Leon MB., Greenberg J, Cutlip DE,et al.
(2002). Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty Free of Emboli Randomized (SAFER)
Trial Investigators. Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during
percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein aortocoronary bypass grafts.
Circulation, 105(11), 1285 –1290.
45. Hong MK, Mehran R, Dangas G, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Pichard AD, et al.
(1999). Creatine kinase-MB enzyme elevation following successful saphenous
vein graft intervention is associated with late mortality. Circulation, 100(24),
2400–2405.
46. Selvanayagam JB, Porto I, Channon K, Petersen SE, Francis JM, Neubauer S,
et al. (2005). Troponin elevation after percutaneous coronary intervention directly
represents the extent of irreversible myocardial injury: insights from
cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation, 111(8), 1027 –1032.
47. Ellis SG, Chew D, Chan A, Whitlow PL, Schneider JP, Topol EJ. (2002).
Death following creatine kinaseMB elevation after coronary intervention:
identification of an early risk period: importance of creatine kinase-MB level,
completeness of revascularization, ventricular function, and probable benefit of
statin therapy.Circulation, 106(10), 1205–1210.
48. Brenner SJ, Lytle BW, Schneider JP, Ellis SG, Topol EJ. (2002). Association
between CK-MB elevation after percutaneous or surgical revascularization and
three-year mortality.J Am Coll Cardiol, 40(11), 1961–1967.
49. Roe MT, Mahaffey KW, Kilaru R, Alexander JH, Akkerhuis KM, Simoons
ML, et al. (2004). Creatine kinase-MB elevation after percutaneous coronary
References |P a g e 49
intervention predicts adverse outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
Eur Heart J, 25(4), 313–321.
50. Feldman DN, Minutello RM, Bergman G, Moussa I, Wong SC. (2009).
Relation of troponin I levels following nonemergent percutaneous coronary
intervention to short-and long-term outcomes. Am J Cardiol, 104(9), 1210 –1215.
51. Bertinchant JP, Polge A, Ledermann B, Genet L, Fabbro-Peray P, Raczka F, et
al. (1999). Relation of minor cardiac troponin I elevation to late cardiac events
after uncomplicated elective successful percutaneous transluminal coronary
angioplasty for angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol, 84(1), 51–57.
52. Fuchs S, Kornowski R, Mehran R, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac troponin-I
levels following catheter-based coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol.
2000;85:1077–1082.
53. Cantor WJ, Newby LK, Christenson RH, Tuttle RH, Hasselblad V, Armstrong
PW, et al. (2002). Prognostic significance of elevated troponin I after
percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol, 39(11), 1738–1744.
54. Scirica BM, Morrow DA, Cannon CP, de Lemos JA, Murphy S, Sabatine
MS,et al. (2007). Clinical application of C-reactive protein across the spectrum of
acute coronary syndromes. Clin Chem, 53(10), 1800–1807.
55. Pearson T, Mensah GA, Alexander RW, Anderson JL, Cannon RO III, Criqui
M,et al. (2003). Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: application
to clinical and public health practice: a statement for healthcare professionals from
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart
Association.Circulation, 107(3), 499–511.
56. Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Brennan DM, Topol EJ. (2006). Optimal timing for
the initiation of pre-treatment with 300 mg clopidogrel before percutaneous
coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol, 47(5), 939–943.
References |P a g e 50
57. Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJ, Bertrand ME, Lewis BS, Natarajan MK, et al.
(2001). Effects of pre-treatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-
term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-
CURE Study. Lancet, 358(9281), 527– 533.
58. Patti G, Colonna G, Pasceri V, Pepe LL, Montinaro A, Di Sciascio G. (2005).
Randomized trial of high loading dose of clopidogrel for reduction of
periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing coronary intervention:
results from the ARMYDA-2 (Antiplatelet Therapy for Reduction of Myocardial
Damage During Angioplasty) study. Circulation, 111(16), 2099-2106.
59. The ESPRIT Investigators. (2000). Novel dosing regimen of eptifibatide in
planned coronary stent implantation (ESPRIT): a randomised, placebo-controlled
trial. Lancet, 356(9247), 2037– 2044.
60. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Neumann FJ, Dotzer F, ten Berg J, Bollwein H, et al.
(2006). Abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing
percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel pretreatment: the ISAR-
REACT 2 randomized trial. JAMA, 295(13), 1531 –1538.
61. Brigori C, Visconti G, Focaccio A, Golia B, Chieffo A, Castelli A, et al.
(2009). Novel Approaches for Preventing or Limiting Events (Naples) II trial:
impact of a single high loading dose of atorvastatin on periprocedural myocardial
infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 54(23), 2157–2163.
62. Patti G, Colonna G, Pasceri V, Miglionico M, Fischetti D, Sardella G, et al.
(2007). Atorvastatin pretreatment improves outcomes in patients with acute
coronary syndromes undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention: results
of the ARMYDA-ACS randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol, 49(12), 1272– 1278.
63. Di Sciascio G, Patti G, Pasceri V, Gaspardone A, Colonna G, Montinaro A.
(2009). Efficacy of atorvastatin reload in patients on chronic statin therapy
undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the
References |P a g e 51
ARMYDARECAPTURE (Atorvastatin for Reduction of Myocardial Damage
During Angioplasty) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol, 54(6), 558–565.
64. Stone GW, Webb J, Cox DA, Brodie BR, Qureshi M, Kalynych A, et al.
(2005). Distal microcirculatory protection during percutaneous coronary
intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A randomized
controlled trial (EMERALD trial). JAMA, 293(9), 1063–1072.
65. Mauri L, Cox D, Hermiller J, Massaro J, Wahr J, Tay SW, et al. (2007). The
PROXIMAL trial: proximal protection during saphenous vein graft intervention
using the Proxis Embolic Protection System: a randomized, prospective,
multicenter clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol, 50(15), 1442–1449.
66. Kharbanda RK, Mortensen UM, White PA, Kristiansen SB, Schmidt MR,
Hoschtitzky JA, et al. (2002). Transient limb ischemia induces remote ischemic
preconditioning in vivo. Circulation, 106(23), 2881 –2883.
67. Hoole SP, Heck PM, Sharples L, Khan SN, Duehmke R, Densem CG, et al.
(2009). Cardiac remote ischemic preconditioning in coronary stenting (CRISP
Stent) study. Circulation, 119(6), 820–827.
68. Testa L, Van Gaal WJ, Biondi Zoccai GG, Agostoni P, Latini RA, Bedogni F,
et al (2009). Myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: a
meta-analysis of troponin elevation applying the new universal definition. QJM,
102(1), 369–378.
69. Nienhuis MB, Ottervanger JP, Bilo HJ, Dikkeschei BD, Zijlstra F. (2008).
Prognostic value of troponin after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a
meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 71(3), 318–324.
70. Akkerhuis KM, Alexander JH, Tardiff BE, Boersma E, Harrington RA,
Lincoff AM, et al. (2002). Minor myocardial damage and prognosis: are
spontaneous and percutaneous coronary intervention-related events different?
Circulation, 105(5), 554–556.
References |P a g e 52
71. Simoons ML, van den Brand M, Lincoff M, Harrington R, van der Wieken R,
Vahanian A, et al. (1999). Minimal myocardial damage during coronary
intervention is associated with impaired outcome. Eur Heart J, 20(15), 1112–
1119.
72. Pasceri V, Patti G, Nusca A, Pristipino C, Richichi G, Di Sciascio G. (2004).
Randomized trial of atorvastatin for reduction of myocardial damage during
coronary intervention: results from the ARMYDA(Atorvastatin for Reduction of
Myocardial Damage during Angioplasty) study. Circulation, 110(6), 674–678.
73. Briguori C, Visconti G, Focaccio A, Golia B, Chieffo A, Castelli A, et al.
(2009). Novel approaches for preventing or limiting events (Naples) II: trial
impact of a single high loading dose of atorvastatin on periprocedural myocardial
infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 54(23), 2157–2163.
74. Yun KH, Jeong MH, Oh SK, Rhee SJ, Park EM, Lee EM, et al. (2009). The
beneficial effect of high loading dose of rosuvastatin before percutaneous
coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiol,
137(3) 246–251.
75. Merla R, Reddy NK, Wang FW, Uretsky BF, Barbagelata A, Birnbaum Y.
(2007). Meta-analysis of published reports on the effect of statin treatment before
percutaneous coronary intervention on periprocedural myonecrosis. Am J Cardiol,
100(5), 770–776.
76. Wang FW, Osman A, Otero J, Stouffer GA, Waxman S, Afzal A, et al. (2003).
Distal myocardial protection during percutaneous coronary intervention with an
intracoronary betablocker. Circulation, 107(23), 2914–2919.
77. Lee CH, Low A, Tai BC, Co M, Chan MY, Lim J, et al. (2007). Pretreatment
with intracoronary adenosine reduces the incidence of myonecrosis after
nonurgent percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective randomized study.
Eur Heart J, 28(1), 19–25.
References |P a g e 53
78. Foroughinia F, Salamzadeh J, Namazi MH. (2013). Protection from
procedural myocardial injury by omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs): is
related with lower levels of creatine kinase-MB (CKMB) and troponin-I?
Cardiovasc Ther, 31(5), 268–273.
79. Piot C, Croisille P, Staat P, Thibault H, Rioufol G, Mewton N, et al. (2008).
Effect of cyclosporine on reperfusion injury in acute myocardial infarction. N
Engl J Med, 359(5), 473–481.
80. Wang CL, Rainwater DL, Mahaney MC, Stocker R. (2004).
Cosupplementation with vitamin E and coenzyme Q10reduces circulating markers
of inflammation in baboons. Am J Clin Nutr, 80(3), 649 –55.
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشکده داروسازی
نامه جهت دریافت دکتری عمومی داروسازی پایان
عنوان:
در MB -و آنزیم کراتین کیناز I -بر روی سطح تروپونین قلبی 01ارزیابی اثر کوآنزیم کیو
بیماران تحت انجام آنژیوپلاستی : کارآزمایی بالینی کنترل شده تصادفی
نگارش:
فاطمه هوشمند
اساتید راهنما:
دکتر طاهر انتظاری ملکی
تر ناصر اصلان آبادیدک
اساتید مشاور:
دکتر علیرضا گرجانی
دکتر صمد غفاری
9773شماره پایان نامه: 0931اردیبهشت
خلاصه
میر بیماران وبا مرگ PCI پیروکرهای قلبی افزایش بیومارگذشته، مطالعات طبق : مقدمه
یکی از اهداف مهم در نظر گرفته PCIدارد. بنابراین حفاظت قلبی در حین مستقیم ارتباط
های ایسکمیک قلبی این مطالعه در بیماری 01کوآنزیم کیو با توجه به اثرات بالقوه می شود.
PCIدر برابر آسیب میو کاردی حین 01کوآنزیم کیو برای بررسی اثرات محافظت قلبی
طراحی شد.
MB-و آنزیم کراتین کیناز I-بر روی سطح تروپونین قلبی 01کوآنزیم کیو : ارزیابی اثر هدف
.در بیماران تحت انجام آنژیوپلاستی
صورت تصادفی به دو نفر بود که به 011عداد کل بیماران در این مطالعه : تکار و مواد روش
( تقسیم شدند گروه کنترل فقط درمان استاندارد و گروه 01( و گروه مداخله )01گروه کنترل )
دریافت کردند. برای PCIقبل 01کوآنزیم کیو mg 911مداخله علاوه بر درمان استاندارد ،
بعد از ساعت 31و 8، در وضعیت پایه cTnIو CK-MBارزیابی آسیب میوکارد سطح خونی
PCI و نیز سطح پلاسماییhs-CRP ساعت بعد 31در حالت پایه وPCI .اندازه گیری شد
بیماران تا یک ماه بعد نیز از نظر عوارض قلبی وسیع تحت پیگیری قرار گرفتند.
( =173/1Pساعت ) CK-MB ،8: تفاوت معنی داری بین دو گروه از نظر ها یافته
ساعت 31( و =163/1P) I ،8تروپونین و نیز از نظر PCI( بعد از =313/1Pساعت ) 31و
(836/1P= بعد از )PCI ه مداخله و گروه کنترل پیدا نشد. ولی دو گروه از نظر بین گروhs-
CRP ،31 ( 190/1ساعتP= ) بعد ازPCI .تفاوت قابل توجهی داشتند
های قلبی را نتوانست بیومارکر 01کوآنزیم کیو : در این مطالعهپیش درمانی باگیرینتیجه
شد. بنابراین برای تصمیم گیری hs-CRP دارکاهش دهد. از طرف دیگر باعث کاهش معنی
قطعی نیاز به اجرای مطالعات مشابه با تعداد نمونه بیشتر است.
، بیو مارکر های قلبی ، کراتین آسیب میوکارد حین جراحی ،01کوآنزیم کیو : واژگان کلیدی
.I ،hs-CRP، تروپونین MB-کیناز
أ
مقدمه:
درصد 10آسیب ایسکمیک قلبی موجب مشکلات اقتصادی و سلامتی فراوانی میشود.بیش از
مرگ و میردرکشورهای اروپای شمالی در دهه ی گذشته گزارش شده که ناشی از بیماریهای
درصد 08ایسکمی قلبی و عروقی بوده است. شرایط مشابهی در کانادا وجود دارد و بیش از
ی مربوط به ایسکمی قلبی است. قبل از اینکه بتوانیم آسیب مرگ و میرهای قلبی و عروق
IL-1و TNF-αایسیکمیک قلبی را درمان کنیم ،فاکتورهایی را باید مد نظر قرار دهیم. تجمع
دربافت ایسکمیک علاوه بر اینکه منجربه آسیب مستقیم بافتی میشود،با آزادسازی رادیکالهای
اند. آزاد اکسیژن به اندوتلیوم آسیب میرس
مروری بر متون:
Yamumura و گروهش اولین کسانی بودند که ازCoEnzyme Q10
(Ubiquinoneبرای درمان بیماری های قلبی )- 0373ستفاده کردند. در سال .0عروقی ا
Littarru از ایتالیا و گروهش کمبودCoQ10 در بیماری قلبی در بیماران با عمل
bypass .اثبات کردند
Stocker کارانش برای اولین بار نشان دادند که و همCoQ10 میتواند باعث مهار آترو
اسکلروزیس شود.
را روی عملکرد اندوتلیوم در افراد با Q10و همکارانش اثر مثبت کو آنزیم Littaruاخیراً
مشکلات شریان کرونر نشان دادند.
ب
CoQ10 خصوص سلول یک ترکیب طبیعی در رژیم غذایی است که توسط همه سلول ها به
های عضلانی سنتز میشود. این ترکیب از اسید آمینه تیروزین سنتز میشود که یک فرآیند چند
ویتامین و چندین فوتوکمیکال است. 8مرحله ای نیازمند حداقل
در سلول CoQ10می شود. کمبود CoQ10فقدان هر کدام از موارد مذکور سبب فقدان
عروقی می تواند در ریتم شبانه روزی این سلول ها اختلال ایجاد کند .-های عصبی وقلبی
Hiasa آزمایشی جهت کنترل وضعیت بیماران آنژینی انجام داد. در این آزمایش در بیمارانی
مصرف میکردند در مقایسه با پلاسبو زمان ورزش افزایش یافت. CoQ10که
بدون اینکه بر ریت قلبی تأثیر داشته باشد، می تواند CoQ10د که در نهایت نتیجه این ش
پنج آزمایش برای اثبات مطالب مذکور 0330تا 0381شود. از سال STباعث افزایش موج
.انجام شده است
از طریق برقراری فسفریلاسیون اکسیداتیو و تولید CoQ10شواهد بر این است که درمان با
ATPمقابل ایسکمی میشود. باعث محافظت قلب در
می تواند باعث مهار ترومبوز از طریق مهار بیان CoQ10مطالعات حاکی از آن است که
( داشته باشد.AMIرسپتور ویترونکتین شود و اثر مثبتی بر درمان انفارکتوس میوکارد حاد )
در ونیز اختلال CoQ10مطالعات فراوانی نشان داده است که استاتین ها سبب کاهش سطح
زنجیره انتقال انرژی در میتئکندری شده و در نهایت منجر به میوپاتی می گردد.
در نهایت برای جلوگیری از این سمیت استاتین ها می توان میزان دوز این داروها را کاهش داد
را به رژیم دارویی افزود. CoQ10و
ج
برابر حد 9(به بیشتر ازCK-MBو -Iافزایش بیومارکرهای قلبی)تروپونین ACCبر اساس تعریف
برابر آنزیم ها نکروز درنظر 0-9نرمال انفارکتوس در نظر گرفته می شود،در حالی که افزایش
گرفته می شود. مطالعات اولیه ذکر می کردند که این افزایش سطح بیومارکرهای قلبی فقط
نشان می دهد یک نشت ساده آنزیمی بدون درگیری طولانی مدت می باشد ولی مطالعات اخیر
در کوتاه مدت،میان مدت وبلند مدت با PCIکه افزایش آنزیم ها بعد از انجام آنژیوگرافی و
پیامدهای جانبی و به خصوص مرگ ومیر ارتباط معنی داری دارد.
توصیه می کند در تمامی بیماران بدون در نظر گرفتن علایم،اندازه ACC/AHAگاید لاینهای
به طور روتین برای ارزیابی افزایش آنها انجام PCIساعت بعد از 8-03گیری بیومارکرهای قلبی
شود.
با افزایش PCIدر بیماران تحت CK-MBچندین مطالعه نشان داده است که افزایش اندک
به CK-MBبرابری 0-3مرگ ومیر در آنها در ارتباط است، نشان داده شده است افزایش
بیشتر از سطح نرمال یک ریسک فاکتور غیر مستقیم برای مرگ و میر است،در حالی که
9به کمتر از CK-MBبرابری آن ریسک فاکتور مستقیم مرگ و میر است.افزایش 9افزایش
می تواند با افزایش مرگ و میر در بیماران دارای سایر ریسک فاکتورهای برابر سطح نرمال
بیماری های قلبی در ارتباط باشد.
مشخص شد که بار ultrasoundبا تصاویر داخل عروقی PCIبیمار تحت 3306در مطالعه
ز بعد ا CK-MBپلاک)میزان پلاک( می تواند به عنوان نشانه ای برای برای پیش بینی افزایش
PCI عمل کند. همچنین ارتباط خطی قوی بین افزایش بیومارکرهای قلبی وسایز آسیب غیر
د
post proceduralقابل برگشت قلبی وجود دارد ونیز رابطه خطی بین مرگ و میر و افزایش
CK-MB . وجود داردFeldman برابر سطح تروپونین 0و همکارانش نشان دادند که افزایش
I ن مرگ و میر در طولانی مدت در ارتباط است. مطالعه تصاویر با افزایش میزاmagnetic
resonance ارتباط مستقیم بین افزایش تروپونین-I قابل برگشت قلبی را نشان و آسیب غیر
. در کل افزایش بیومارکرهای قلبی منجر به گسترش وناپایداری بار آترواسکلروتیک می می دهد
.های آینده مستعد می کند ایسکمی شود که بیمار رابرای
و وقوع حوادث قلبی عروقی CRPبین افزایش سطح داریدر مطالعات فراوانی ارتباط معنی
چنین افزایش این فاکتور ارتباط مستقیمی با افزایش مرگ و میر به نشان داده شده است. هم
حاد ومزمن و نیز صورت کوتاه مدت و بلند مدت در بیمارانی که در خطر ابتلا به ایسکمی قلبی
بیمارانی که دچار آترواسکلروز هستند وجود دارد.
بر روی سطح CoEnzyme Q10اثر بر اساس مطالعات فوق هدف از این مطالعه بررسی
در بیماران ایسکمیک قلبی تحت انجام MB -و آنزیم کراتنین کیناز I -تروپونین قلبی
می باشد. آنژیوگرافی
ه
نمونه:
سال که فرم رضایت نامه 08نفرازبیماران بالای 011این مطالعه به صورت پایلوت بر روی
به مرکز تحقیقاتی و درمانی شهید مدنی تبریز، ایران PCIاخلاقی را تکمیل نموده و برای
مراجعه کرده اند ، به صورت تصادفی و با روش تصادفی سازی سیستماتیک و اعداد حاصله از
و گروه کنترل تقسیم CoEnzyme Q10نفری گروه تحت درمان با 01و گروه کامپیوتر به د
انفارکتوس حاد ،mg/dl 3کراتینین سرم بالای فاکتورهای خروج از مطالعه شامل میشوند .
سابقه نارسایی کلیوی مرحله آخریا دیالیز ، شوک کاردیوژنیک، سندرم کرونری ناپایدار ،میوکارد
عروق اصلی branchانجام آنژوپلاستی وتعبیه استنت بیمارانی که در حین و شدن
compromise .میشود
روش کار:
اطلاعات دموگرافیک، بالینی، آزمایشگاهی و درمانی اولیه بیماران از طریق بررسی پرونده
ن اطلاعات پزشکی بیماران و مصاحبه حضوری با آن ها در فرم مخصوص ثبت می گردد. ای
سابقه بیماری/ بیماریها، سابقه مصرف دارویی، داروهای مصرفی سن، جنس، وزن، قد، شامل
باشد.می کنونی )نام، شکل دارویی، دوز، مسیر و فواصل تجویز، تاریخ شروع و پایان مصرف(
همه ی بیماران همان پروتکل معمول آماده سازی برای آنژیو پلاستی را که شامل هیدراسیون
⧵ccکنند .هیدراسیون با نرمال سالینقبل و بعد جراحی میباشد دریافت می 𝑘𝑔0.0- 0 6 از
CoEnzyme Q10ساعت بعد عمل انجام میشود.در گروه تحت درمان 6ساعت قبل عمل تا
تجویز می شود ارزیابی های پاراکلینیکال در آزمایشگاه PCIقبل از mg911 با دوز
و
بیماران و پروتکل مطالعه ناآگاه بیمارستانی انجام می شود و کارکنان آزمایشگاه نسبت به
هستند.آنژیوپلاستی کرونری با استفاده ازماده کنتراست ایزو اسمولار غیر
Iopramide یا( vesipaque320- GE.healthcare.corl20Irelandیونی)
(ultravist300.scheringAG.Gerinang) نوع ماده کنتراست بوسیله کاردیولوژیست
Interventional که جراحی را انجام می دهد انتخاب شده است در همه ی بیماران سطح
-hsونیز سطح PCI از ساعت بعد 31و 8ساعت قبل و CK-MB 03وIسرمی تروپونین قلبی
CRP ساعت بعد 31در حالت پایه وPCI اندازه گیری می برای بررسی میزان آسیب قلبی
شود.
نتایج:
نفر به دلیل سطح بالای 08بیمار در مطالعه شرکت کردند که از بین آنها 011در کل
نارسایی و PCIماه قبل از 9پس قلبی ی بایسابقه، PCIساعت قبل 18بیومارکرهای قلبی
شدند و اطلاعات آنها آنالیز شد. بیمار وارد مطالعه 011کلیوی از مطاله خارج شدند. نهایتا
در گروه مداخله( که نشان دهنده شیوع %06در گروه کنترل و %61) مرد بودند اکثر بیماران
بیشتر بیماریهای قلبی و عروقی در مردان است.
های قلبی عروقی و فشارخون ریسک فاکتورهای عمده در هر دو گروه سابقه خانوادگی بیماری
ه داروهای قلبی عروقی بود. بالا بودند. بیشترین داروهای مصرفی در هر دو گروه متعلق به دست
در تمامی بیماران نوع استنت بکار رفته، دارویی بود.
ز
RCAو LADعروقی که بیشترین استنت گذاری روی آنها انجام شده در هر دو گروه به ترتیب
بودند.
CK-MB (081/1پایه در هر دو گروه ازمشابه بود=P در. )CK-MB 8 ساعت بعد از 31وPCI
ساعت بعد 8و مداخله تفاوت معنی داری نداشتند. میانگین تفاوت مقادیر پایه ودو گروه کنترل
PCI (761/1P=مقادیر پایه و ،)ساعت بعد 31PCI (819/1P= و مقادیر )ساعت بعد 31و 8
PCI (106/1P= )بین گروه کنترل و مداخله معنی دار نبود.
(. میانگین تفاوت =11/0Pدر هر دو گروه در حالت پایه بی معنی بود ) Iتغییرات تروپونین
و PCI (160/1P=)ساعت بعد 31، پایه و PCI (880/1P=)ساعت بعد 8مقادیر مقادیر پایه و
( معنی دار نبود.=0P) PCIساعت بعد 31و 8مقادیر
(. میانگین =111/1Pداری داشت )در حالت پایه برای هر دو گروه تفاوت معنی hs-CRPسطح
(.=1110/1Pمعنی دار بود ) PCIساعت بعد 31تفاوت مقادیر پایه و
: گیرینتیجه بحث و
مکانیسم های متعددی در گسترش آسیب میوکارد حین جراحی دخیل هستندکه عبارتند از:
مثل انسداد شاخه جانبی ناشی از باد کردن بالون یا جایگذاری استنت، آمبولی دیستال پلاکهای
هورمونی و استرس -آترومی، فعال سازی پلاکت و تشکیل ترومبوز، فعال سازی عصبی
استفاده PCI به همین دلیل بعضی از داروها بعنوان محافظ قلب قبل از اکسیداتیو و التهاب.
.می شوند
ح
ساعت I 8وتروپونین CK-MB نتوانست سطح 01کوآنزیم کیودر این مطالعه پیش درمانی با
به طور معنی داری کاهش دهد، elective PCIرا در بیماران تحت PCIساعت بعد از 31و
بود ولی از 01کوآنزیم کیوبه نفع اثرات سودمند PCIمارکر ها بعد از هر چند روند تغییرات بیو
توانست به 01عنی دار نرسید. از طرف دیگر پیش درمانی با کوآنزیم کیونظر آماری به سطح م
تواند تا حدودی فرضیه را در گروه مداخله کاهش دهد که می hs-CRPداری سطح طور معنی
در این مطالعه می توان به حجم نمونه کوچک و ها احتمالی یافتهمطالعه را تایید کند. از علل
01کوآنزیم کیوتوانایی تشخیصی محدود کیت ها اشاره کرد. از طرفی زمان و دوز پیش درمانی
به طور دقیق در مطالعات مشخص نشده است و شاید انجام مطالعات در مقیاس وسیع تر بتواند
ن کند و بتوان قطعی تر تصمیم گرفت.برامحدودیت های مطالعه حال حاضر را ج