TABLE OF CONTENTS - Gujaratgswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Junagadh/Jun_IWMP_6.pdfDetailed...

WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT TEAM-JUNAGADH

Detailed Project Report – I.W.M.P.-6, JUNAGADH

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter -1 Project Background ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................11

1.1Project Background ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................12

Table no.1 : Basic project information .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................12

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme .......................................................................................................................................................................................................13

Table no. 2: Weight age of the project ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................13

Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weight age for selection of watershed ...........................................................................................................................................................................14-15

Table no.3: Watershed information .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................16

1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the all village .............................................................................................................................................................16

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area.................................................................................................... ...........................16

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area ..........................................................................................................................................................................17

Chapter - 2 Project Implementing Agency................................................................................................................................ ....18

Table no. 6: PIA: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................19

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................19

2.1. Project Implementing Agency ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................20

2.2 About District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Junagadh..................................................................................................................................................................20



2.2.1 The organization and its objectives:...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................20-21

2.2.2 Programmes/project running in the district ................................................................................................................................................................................................................22

2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU:...................................................................................................................................................................................................23

Chapter - 3 Basic Information of the Project Area.......................................................................... ...........................................24

3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................25

3.1.1 Land use pattern: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................27

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .............27

3.1.2 Soil and topography: ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....... .......28

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:.................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................28

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:..................................................................................................................................................................................................................29

Table no. 11: Soil Erosion...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29

Table no. 11.1: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress).........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................29

Table no. 12: Last six years annual rainfall, maximum & minimum temperature of Junagadh .......................................................... ..................................30

3. 2 Slope............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................30

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............ 30

3.2.1 Land and Agriculture: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .....................31

Table no. 14: Land ownership details......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................31



Table no. 15: Agriculture.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................31

Table no. 16: Crop details: ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................32.

3. 2. 2 Irrigation...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32

Table no. 17: Irrigation .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................33

Table no. 18: Livestock............................................................................................................................. ..........................................................................33

3. 2. 3 Drinking Water...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................33

Table no. 19 : Drinking water...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................34

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources..........................................................................................................................................................................................34

3.3 Socio-Economic Profile...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................35

Table no. 21: Demographic information .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................35

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................35

3.3.1 Migration Pattern:.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................35

Table no. 23: Migration details ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 36

Table no. 24: Poverty ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36

3.3.2 Infrastructure facilities:............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................36

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 37

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 37



3. 4. Livelihood pattern:........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 38

Table no. 27: Yearly Income ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 38

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................38

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)..............................................................................................................................................................................39

Chapter - 4 Watershed Activities ..............................................................................................................................................................................40

4.1 Watershed act ivies ...............................................................................................................................................................................................41

4.1.1 Scientific Planning:.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................41-47

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP-6 projects .................................................................................................................................................... 48 - 49

4.2. Institution Building .................................................................................................................................. .......................................................................................................................49

4. 2. 1 Watershed Committee Details......................................................................................................................................................................................................................49

Table no.31.1 - Watershed Committee Details (Patapur)...........................................................................................................................................................................50

Table no. -31.2 -Watershed Committee Details (Khadiya)............................................................................................................................................................................51

Table no. -31.3 - Watershed Committee Details (Dungarpur)....................................................................................................................................................................52

Table no. -31.4 -Watershed Committee Details (Ivnagar)...........................................................................................................................................................................53

Table no. -31.5 - Watershed Committee Details (Palaswa) ...54

Table no. -31.6 - Watershed Committee Details (Vijapur)...55



4.2.2 Self Help Group .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................56

Table no. 32: SHG details..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................56

4.2.3 User Group:.................................................................................................................. .............................................................................................57

Table no.33 : Name of UG & Major Tasks..............................................................................................................................................................................................................57

Table no. 33.1 : UG details.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................58

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP-6 Junagadh............................................................................................................................................................58

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................58

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)..........................................................................................................................59-61

4.3.2.Watershed Development Works: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................61

Drainage Line Treatment Plan: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 61

Technical Specification of Check Dam.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................62-70

Technical Details of Percolation Well ............................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................70-71

Table no. 35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (all financial figures in lakh) .........................................................................................................72

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface Water Resources in the Project Areas (all financial figures in lakh)......................................................................73-76

Table no. 37: Activities Related to Recharging Ground Water Resources in Project Areas (all financial figures in lakh)...........................................................................................77

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the Project Areas ...................................................................................................78-80



Table no. 38.1: Details of allied / other. Activities in Project Areas...................................................................................................................................................................81-91

Table no.39: Details of engineering structures in watershed works........................................................................................................................................................92-99

Table No. 40: Technical Details /Estimates of Farm Bund.......................................................................................................................................99

Drainage Line Treatment and Water Harvesting: 100

Table No. 40.1: Technical details of Percolation Tank............................................................................................................................. ...................100

Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works........................................................................................101-106

Table No. 41.6: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works-proposed target ...........................................................107

Table No. 42: Technical Details of Afforestation Activities.......................................................................................................................................108

Table No. 42.1: Cost Estimation for afforestation activity.................................................................... .....................................................................108

Micro Enterprise Activities for IWMP-6 Junagadh Watershed Project .

Microenterprise: - 1Paper Dish Bowl Making Unit...................................................................................................................................................................................109-110

Microenterprise :- 2Vermi Composting Unit …………...............................................................................................................................................................................111-112

Microenterprise :- 3 BeckaryUnit ………….................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................113

Production System for IWMP-6 Junagadh Watershed Project

Production System-:1 Papad Making Unit ............................................................................................................ ..........................................................................................114-117

Production System-:2 Detergent Powder Unit................................................................................................................. ..................................................................................118

Production System-:3 Incense Sticks Unit............................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................119



Production System-:4 Masala Unit............................................................................................................................. ..........................................................................................120

Table No. 43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas ..................................................................................................................122-124

Agriculture Improvement Programme.................................................................................................................................................................125

Training and Exposure visits...........................................................................................................................................................................123

Livelihood Intervention...................................................................................................................................................................................123

Advantages of Agro-Based Activities...........................................................................................................................................................124

Support Needed for Promotion of Micro-Enterprises....................................................................................................................................125

Floriculture......................................................................................................................................................................................................126

4.4. Capacity Building and Institutional collaboration.............................................................................................. .....................................................126

Table no. 44: Institutes Identified for Capacity Building .............................................................................................................................................................................128

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan for IWMP-6. (Village wise)............................................................................................................................. ..................................129-131

Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities: .................................................................................................................................................132

Chapter - 5 Budgeting.....................................................................................................................................................133

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 134

Table no. 48: Village component wise budget available under IWMP ..................................................................................................................................................135

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement.....................................................................................................................................................................................135



Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes.................................................................................................................................. .................136-137

Chapter - 6 Expected Outcome.............................................................................................................. ..................................138

6.1 Expected Outcomes ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................139

6.1.1 Employment ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................139

Table no. 51: Employment in Project area ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................139

6.1.2.Migration.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................140

Table no. 52: Details of seasonal migration from project area...........................................................................................................................................................................141

Table no. 53: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas: (in mtr) ................................................................................................................142

6.1.3 Drinking water ... ..................................................................................................................................................................................................142

Table no. 54: status of drinking water ........................................................................................................................................... ......................143

6.1.4 Crops............................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................143

Table no. 55: Details of crop area and yield in the project area...........................................................................................................................................................................144

6.1.5 Horticulture .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................144

Table no. 56 : Area under horticulture............................................................................................................................................................................................................................114

6.1.6 Vegetative cover ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................144

Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................145



6.1.7 Livestock............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................145

Table no. 58: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.). …............145

6.1.8 Linkages ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................146

Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkage...........................................................................................................................................................................................,...........................146

6.2 Logical Framework Analysis......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................147-151

Chapter- 7 Quality and Sustainability Issue..........................................................................................................................152

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation............................................................................................................. ......................................153

7.1.1 Vigilance and Monitoring Committees.............................................................................................................................................................154

7.1.2 Research support in watershed management....................................................................................................................................................154

7.1.3 Farmer organization and empowerment...........................................................................................................................................................154

7.1.4 Use of traditional institutions and indigenous knowledge...............................................................................................................................155

7.2 Plans for Project management: ............................................................................................ ...................................................................................................156

7.3 Watershed Development Fund: ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................156

Table no. 60 Details of Watershed Development Fund (WDF)............................................................................................................................................156

7.4 User Charges:.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................157



CHAPTER - 1

PROJECT BACKGROUND



1.1 Project Background

The project IWMP-6 is being implemented in Junagadh taluka of Junagadh district with six villages forming the cluster. The villages are Khadiya,

Dungarpur, Patapur, Ivnagar, Palaswa and Vijapur. The cumulative area proposed to be treated under the project is 4916.10 hectares. Khadiya is the largest

village in the cluster with a proposed area of 1774.50 hectares followed by Palaswa (1055.70), Vijapur (641.60), Ivnagar (504.30), Dungarpur (499.00) and

Patapur (441.00).

The nearest town is Junagadh which is about 10 kms from the nearest village in the project cluster. All the villages are connected by pucca road with

the highway. The major communities residing in the cluster are Ahirs, Patels & Kadiyas. The people mainly depend on agriculture as their main source of

livelihood with 80% of the people engaged in it. Groundnut is the major crop. The current generation of youngsters in the villages generally migrates to

nearby cities like Rajkot, Morbi, Jamnagar and Porbandar for working in the bandhni industries, tile factories, cement factories, and diamond polishing

centers. The land is generally plain and forest area is virtually non-existent in the cluster – IWMP -6.

Water is available for 10-11 months during the year. In our project cluster, drinking water is well available in five villages by virtue of supply from

bore well and well.

Table no. 1: Basic project information

S.R.

No.

Name of

the

project

Villages Gram

Panchayats

Taluka District Area of

the

project

Area

proposed to

be treated

Total

project cost

(Rs. in lakh)

PIA

Name C2K code

1

IWMP-6

Khadiya 120030081830000 Khadiya Junagadh

Junagadh 1774.50 1774.50 212.94 DCF

Junagadh 2 Vijapur 120030081780000 Vijapur 641.60 641.60 76.99

3 Dungarpur 120030081770000 Dungarpur 499.00 499.00 59.88

4 Patapur 120030081810000 Patapur 441.00 441.00 52.92

5 Ivnagar 120030081650000 Ivnagar 504.30 504.30 60.52

6 Palasva 120030081660000 Palasva 1055.70 1055.70 126.68



1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme

Watershed Development Programme is selected on the basis of thirteen parameter namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual wages,

Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rain fed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area,

Percentage of degraded land, Productivity potential of land, Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated, Cluster Approach for hilly

terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking has been given to the watershed project as given in Table 2.1.

The total number of families under BPL is 1251, which is more than 30 per cent but less than 40 per cent of total households of the village.

Hence a score of 5 is allotted. The percentage of schedule castes in the village is 20 to 30 per cent to the total population; hence a score of 5 is allotted. Rain

fed agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village. More than 60 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages

earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages hence a composite rank of 3, 5 and 10 are allotted respectively.

Table no. 2: Weightage of the Project

Project

name

Project

type

Weightage

I

ii

iii

iv

V

vi

vii

viii

ix

X

xi

xii

xiii

IWMP-6

5 5 5 5 3 15 5 5 5 10 0 15 10



Table No.2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed

S.

No Criteria

Maxi

mum

score

Ranges & scores

I Poverty index (% of poor

to population)

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20

% (2.5)

ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are

significantly lower than

minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are

equal to or higher

than minimum wages

(0)

iv % of small and marginal

farmers

10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)

vi Moisture index/

DPAP/ DDP Block

15 -66.7 & below (15)

DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6 (10)

DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0)

Non DPAP/ DDP Block

vii Area under rain-fed

agriculture

15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70

%

(Reject)

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village

(7.5)

Partially covered (5) Fully

covered

(0)

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 %

(10)

Low- less than 10 % of TGA

(5)



x Productivity potential of

the land

15 Lands with low production

& where productivity can be

significantly enhanced with

reasonable efforts (15)

Lands with moderate

production & where

productivity can be

enhanced with


Lands with high production &

where productivity can be

marginally enhanced with


xi Contiguity to another

watershed that has already

been developed/ treated

10 Contiguous to previously

treated watershed &

contiguity within the micro

watersheds in the project

(10)

Contiguity within the

micro watersheds in

the project but non

contiguous to

previously treated

watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to

previously treated watershed

nor contiguity within the

micro watersheds in the

project (0)

xii Cluster approach in the

plains (more than one

contiguous micro-

watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro-watersheds

in cluster (15)

4 to 6 micro

watersheds in cluster

(10)

2 to 4 micro watersheds in

cluster (5)

xiii Cluster approach in the

hills (more than one

contiguous micro-

watersheds in the project)

15 Above 5 micro-watersheds

in cluster (15)

3 to 5 micro

watersheds in cluster

(10)

2 to 3 micro watersheds in

cluster (5)

Total 150 150 90 41 2.5



Table no. 3: Watershed information

Name of the project No. of watersheds to be

treated

Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order

IWMP-6 16 5G1C4c1g,5G1C4c1f,5G1C4c2b,5G1C4c2a,

5G1C4c3a,5G1C4c3b,5G1C4c2c,5G1C4c2d,

5G1C4c3d,5G1C4c1c,5G1C3b1h,5G1C4c1h,

5G1C4c1j,5G1C4c1g,5G1C4c1d,5G1C3b1e

Milli watershed

1.3 other developmental projects/schemes running in the all village

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area:

SI no

Name of the programme/scheme

Sponsoring agency

Objectives of the programme/scheme

Year of

commencement

Villages covered

Estimated number of

beneficiaries 1 Sakhi Mandal Govt of Gujarat Savings and Employment

2004 6 1685

2 Indira Awas Yojana

CRD

Housing

2005

5

272

3 Sardar Patel Awas Yojana Govt of Gujarat Housing 2005 6 482

4 WASMO

Govt of Gujarat

Drinking water pipeline

2006

3

7300

5 Total Sanitation Campaign Govt of Gujarat Sanitation 2006 6 740

6 NREGS CRD

Employment 2009 6 3020



Table no. 5:

Previous Watershed programmes in the project area



CHAPTER - 2

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY



2.1 Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency (GSWMA),

State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIAs are responsible for implementation of

watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State/ Central Governments, Government Institutes/

Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs). The PIA for IWMP-6 is Deputy Conservator of Forest, Junagadh.

2.2 About District Watershed Development Unit, (DWDU) Junagadh.

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives:

The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Junagadh is a district level nodal agency and was established on 12th June 2008 under

constitution of Para 30 of new guideline, to oversee for the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer

(DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The DWDU has a Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) comprising of both experienced and fresh graduates various

backgrounds like engineering, surveying, community mobilization, accounts, and agriculture and data entry operations. The DWDU is headed by the Project

Manager (deputation from Gujarat Forest Department) assisted by a Technical Expert (on contract basis) and MDT's. The remaining staff i.e. MIS

coordinator, System Analyst, Livestock specialist will be recruited very soon. The DWDU Junagadh has its own office in the Training Complex of the

DRDA, located at Sardar Baug.



The functions of DWDU:

a) Take up the over all responsibility of facilitating preparation of strategic and annual action plans for watershed development

projects in the Taluka.

b) Providing professional and technical support to Project Implementing Agencies (PIAs) in planning and execution of watershed

development projects.

c) Develop action plans for capacity building with close involvement of resource organizations to execute the capacity building

action plans.

d) Carry out regular monitoring, evaluation and learning.

e) Ensure smooth flow of funds to watershed development projects.

f) Ensure timely submission of required documents to SLNA/Nodal Agency of the Department at central level.

g) Facilitate and co-ordination with relevant programmes of agriculture, horticulture, rural development, animal husbandry, etc

with watershed development and convergence plans for enhancement of productivity and livelihoods interventions for asset less

persons.

h) Integrate and co-ordinate watershed development projects/plans into district plans of the district planning committees.

I) Establish and maintain the District Level Date Cell and link it to the State Level and National Level Data Centre.



2.2.2 Programmes/projects running in the district

Junagadh district was assigned 428 projects, covering a total of 2, 10,123 hectares, under the Haryali/ Pre- Haryali Watershed Projects.

Completed projects

There were 59 projects under DPAP Batch 1, 2 & 4 covering 29488 hectares. The total grant was 1239.27 lakhs against which a cumulative

expenditure of 1169.22 lakhs was incurred thus resulting in 95% achievement.

There were 44 projects under EAS covering 16202 hectares. The total grant was 834.72lakhs against which a cumulative expenditure of 802.01 lakhs

was incurred thus resulting in 96.08% achievement.

There were 47 projects under State Watershed covering 23500 hectares. The total grant was 275.07 lakhs against which a cumulative expenditure of

275.07 lakhs was incurred thus resulting in100% achievement.

There were 24 projects under IWDP-1 covering 12000 hectares. The total grant was 482.02 lakhs against which a cumulative expenditure of 480.69

lakhs was incurred thus resulting in 99.72% achievement.

Status of Continuing Projects

There are 160 projects under DPAP- 5 to DPAP-12 covering 79043 hectares. The total grant was 1804.89 lakhs against which a cumulative

expenditure of 1556.97 lakhs was incurred thus resulting in 86.26% achievement.

There are 94 projects under IWDP-2 to IWDP-8 covering 49890 hectares. The total grant was 1245.58 lakhs against which a cumulative expenditure

of 1021.94 lakhs was incurred thus resulting in 82.05% achievement.



Total: There are a total of 254 projects under DPAP and IWDP covering 128933 hectares. The total grant was 3050.47 lakhs against which a

cumulative expenditure of 2578.91 lakhs was incurred thus resulting in 84.54% achievement.

Among the ongoing DPAP projects are DPAP – 5 to DPAP – 12 covering 160 projects. The total grant allocation for the ongoing DPAP projects is

Rs 4530 lakhs against which Rs 1786.52 lakhs has been released till date jointly by the Centre and State. The achievement rate is 84.07% against the

total grant released. The Centre and state shared the total cost in 75:25 proportions. The balance fund available as on March 31, 2010 stands at Rs 287.67

lakhs.

2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU

Strength:

(1) Dedicated and experience staffs and MDT team

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency.

(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, Saurashtra University, KVK and NGOs for capacity building and

Technical guidance

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar

(5) District level monitoring, coordination Committee

(6) Well establishment of PRIs for social audits for transparency and accountability.



Weakness:

(1) Insufficient funds to complete watershed projects per hectare.

(2) Permanent staff is less in numbers.

(3) No permanent office building.

Opportunities:

(1) Sustainable livelihood generation for landless and asset less persons.

(2) Improvement of socio-economic status of poor.

(3) Awareness generation among the beneficiaries through information, education and communication activities.

(4) Reduction in migration rate.

(5) Usage of new technologies of watershed modeling and GPS for monitoring of watershed activities.

Threats:

(1) Lack of sustainable agricultural development package.

(2) Lack of voluntary contribution and cooperation from local peoples.

(3) Party politics in village leading to multi-interest groups



Table no. 6: PIA:

SR. No.

Name of project

Details of PIA

1

IWMP-6

Type of organization

Forest Department

Name of Organisation

[ii) Name of organization

IWMP-6 Junagadh

Designation and Address

(iii) Designation & Address

DCF, Sardar baug Junagadh

Telephone

(ivj Telephone

0285-2631182 Fax

(v) Fax

0285-2635582 E-mail

(vi) E-mail

[email protected]

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:

SR no

Name

Age

Sex

Designation

Qualification

Experience

Job assigned

Monthly remuneration

1

Mrs. ANITA KARN

37 F DCF, Junagadh IFS 15 years

Project Management

45000

2

Mr. D. J. PANDYA

46 M

Nodal Officer

GFS

23 years

Implementation

&mm M

35000

3

Mr. N. D. Hirani 21 M WDT (Engg.)

Diploma(Civil)

16 months Engineering works

8000

4 Mr. P.G. Hinsu 22 M WDT(Agri.) B.R.S. Agri. 22 months Agriculture 8000

5 Ms. H. J. Rabadiya 23 F WDT( CME) M.Sc (Home Sc) 8 months Community 8000

6 Ms. T. S.Vaja 24 F WDT(Accountant) M.Com. 8 months Accounts 7000

7 Mr. K.A.Dodiya 21 M WDT(Surveyor) Surveyor 3.6 years

Surveying 6000

8 Mr. M. M. Vaghela 26 M WDT(DEO) B.Com.(D.C.S.) 5 year Data Entry 5000



CHAPTER - 3

BASIC INFORMATION OF PROJECT AREA



3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology

3.1.1 Land use pattern:

The net geographical area of the six cluster villages is 4916.10 hectares there is no forest area. About 3076.61 ha of land is under agriculture which is

mostly rain fed. Both Kharif and Rabi crops are taken in the cluster. Of the total available waste land 781.50 ha is cultivable and 1085.88 ha is non-

cultivable. The watershed consists Neem, Pipal, Banyan and Gunda which was mainly broadcasted to stop the spread of desert.

Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

S. No.

Names of villages

Geographical Area of the village

(5+8+9)

Forest Area

(ha) Census book

(as on 1999)

Land under agricultural use

Rainfed area (ha)

Permanent Pastures

Wasteland

Cultivable

Cultivable

Non-cultivable

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1

Dungarpur 499.00 0.00 4.72 3.52 0.00 100.00 394.28

2 Ivnagar 504.30 0.00 332.28 188.08 0.00 87.00 89.00

3 Khadiya 1774.50 0.00 1104.10 743.54 0.00 410.00 285.00

4 Palasva 1055.70 0.00 763.04 518.76 0.00 112.00 180.00

5 Patapur 441.00 0.00 306.55 216.48 0.00 50.00 84.45

6 Vijapur 641.60 0.00 565.92 363.68 0.00 22.50 53.15

Total 6 4916.10 0.00 3076.61 2034.06 781.50 1085.88



3.1.2 Soil and topography

Nearly 92 % of the geographical are is comprised of shallow to medium black soil having depth upto 60-95 cm top soil and 8% is red soil. The soil is

slightly reddish to very brown in surface colour. By large soils are well drained with moderate water holding capacity. From sustainable development

perspectives, what is alarming is the steady decline in the soil quality due to sheet erosion. There has a considerable reduction in the application of farm yard

manure resulting in reduced in moisture retention capacity and porosity in the soils. Generally the organic carbon content is too low. Lack of water

conservation measures at the field and at the community level has led to the acceleration of environmental degradation. The farmers generally depend on

internal resources (seeds etc) as inputs for the next season. The topography of the area is moderate ranging from 0-10 % slope.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography

S. No. Name of the Agro-climatic zone covers project area

Area in ha Name of village Major soil types

Topography

Type

1

Saurashtra

499.00 Dungarpur

(field to field Survey )

BLACK SOIL & RED SOIL

FLAT 2 504.30 Ivnagar

3 3 1774.50 Khadiya

4 1055.70 Palasva

5 441.00 Patapur

6 641.60 Vijapur



Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition

SI no

Village

Flood (Incidence)

Drought (Incidence)

1

Dungarpur Nil

Nil

2 Ivnagar Nil 3 Khadiya Nil 4 Palasva Nil 5 Patapur Nil 6 Vijapur Nil

Table no. 11: Soil Erosion

Cause

Type of erosion

Area affected (ha)

Run off (mm/ year]

Average soil loss (Tones/ ha/ year) Water erosion

a

Sheet

1626.83 77866.63 b

Rill

378 3714.67 c

Gully

1152.54 44580.37 d

Ravenous

- -

Sub-Total

3157.37 126161.67

Wind erosion

Total

3157.37

126161.67

Table no. 11.1: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity

(Inherent/Ingress)

Dungarpur

6 to 7.5

In Herent

Ivnagar In Herent

Khadiya In Herent

Palasva In Herent

Patapur In Herent

Vijapur In Herent



Table: 12. Last six years annual rainfall, maximum and minimum temperature of Junagadh taluka

SR. No.

Year

Rainfall (in mm)

Temperature (°C)

Max.

Max.

Min.

1

2004

1025 34.2 21.0 2

2005

1134 33.4 20.3

3

2006

1092 34.6 20.6 4

2007

1417 33.7 21.2

5

2008

1236 33.2 20.8

6

2009

825 34.6 21.2

3.2 Slope

The slope of the watershed was calculated based on topographic elevation (contours and spot height) from satellite maps and provided by BISAG,

Gandhinagar. These maps will help in recommendation/implementation of suitable land management practices in association of other thematic information.

Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief Project name

Elevation

Slope range (%)

Major streams

Dungarpur 4-6 meters 5-6% -

Ivnagar 5-7 meters 6.5-8% -

Khadiya 3-5 meters 5-6% Local river

Palasva 4.5-6.6 meters 6.5-8% -

Patapur

5-7.5 meters 7-8% Gudajali river

Vijapur 5-6 meters 5-6% -



3.2.1 Land and Agriculture

The main crops under agriculture are cotton, groundnut, wheat, sorghum, maize and jawar. The land conservation measures such as earthen bunds

and farm bunds in the area will help them to take up a Rabi crop of wheat in the residual moisture.

Table no. 14: Land ownership details

Sr

no Village

Total owned land

Gen OBC SC ST

1 Dungarpur 0 1 0 0

2 Ivnagar 73 27 0 0

3 Khadiya 42 266 0 2

4 Palasva 105 12 0 1

5 Patapur 32 46 0 0

6 Vijapur 36 151 1 2

Table no. 15: Agriculture

S.R. No. Village Net sown area (ha)

One time Two times Three times

1 Dungarpur 10.00 5.00 0.00

2 Ivnagar 208.39 133 0.00

3 Khadiya 4050.80 415.18 0.00

4 Palasva 462.64 50.00 0.00

5 Patapur 306.55 100.55 0.00

6 Vijapur 565.92 280.00 0.00

Total 5604.30 983.73 0.00



Table no. 16: Crop details

S.R.

No. Village

Kharif (Monsoon) Rabi (Winter)

Crop 1 Groundnut Kg/Ha Crop 1 Wheat kg/ha

Area(Ha) Production(kg) Productivity Area Production(kg) Productivity

1 Dungarpur 3.52 8500 2414 1.2 8500 7083

2 Ivnagar 188.08 298430 1586 134.00 138080 1030

3 Khadiya 613.48 1369875 1914 333.20 483200 1450

4 Palasva 265.76 496680 1868 185.52 249850 1346

5 Patapur 171.48 409900 2390 135.07 287300 2127

6 Vijapur 313.04 612350 1954 252.24 186400 738

Total 1555.36 31,95,735.00 2054.65 1,041.23 13,53,330.00 1299.74

3.2.2 Irrigation

The irrigated area is 818.82 ha, which is 16.67 % of the total area of the cluster villages. Main source of irrigation is from well, bore well and check

dam. Agriculture is mainly rain fed and water for irrigation during the rest part of the year is available from limited sources in Dungarpur, Khadia, Plasawa,

Patapur, Ivnagar and Vijapur.



Table no. 17: Irrigation

S.R. No.

Village

Source 1 : Canal

Source 2 : Pond/Earthen dam

Source 3 : Check dam

Availability months

Availability months

Net area

Gross area

Availability months

Net area

Gross area

Availability months

Net area

Gross area

1

2 Dungarpur - - - - - - - - -

2

Ivnagar - - -

3 Khadiya - - - - - - 4 30 ha -

4 Palasva - - - - - - 4 9 ha -

5 Patapur - - - - - - 4 18 ha

6 Vijapur - - - - - - - - -

Table no. 18: Livestock

S.R. No.

Village

Buffalo

Cow

Total Milk (Buffalo Cow)

Goat

Sheep

Bullock

Hen

Others

No

Milk

No

Milk

No

Milk

1

Dungarpur 23 81289 19 67151 148440 2 0 0 2 0 17

2 Ivnagar 99 127762 15 19358 147120 2 0 0 53 0 48

3 Khadiya 398 463889 128 149191 613080 75 0 0 278 0 208

4 Palasva 184 277484 54 81436 358920 40 0 0 85 0 86

5 Patapur 94 47667 61 30933 78600 160 0 0 97 0 44

6 Vijapur 306 382360 130 162440 544800 125 0 0 148 0 70

Total 1104 1380451 407 510509 1890960 404 0 0 663 0 473

3.2.2 Drinking water Drinking water is available in all the villages through household pipe connections which are linked through the bore well and well with power

operated machines. The quality of water is also good which has led to a reduction in the number of water borne diseases occurring in the village.



Table no. 19: Drinking water S.R.

No.

Village

Ground water table (mt)

Source of drinking water

Availability in months

Quality

1

2

Dungarpur 12 Water tank

12

Good

2

Ivnagar 9 Pipe connection

12

Good

3 Khadiya 8 Pipe connection

12

Good

4 Palasva 10 Pipe connection

12

Good

5 Patapur 10 Pipe connection

12

Good

6 Vijapur 10 Pipe connection

12

Good

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

S.R.

No.

Names of

project

CPR

Particulars

Total Area (ha)

Area owned/ In possession of Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt. persons

Govt.

(Specify

deptt.)

PRI

Any other

(Pl.

Specify)

Pvt.

persons

Govt.

(Specify

deptt.)

PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

1 IWMP-6

Wasteland/ degraded land 517 212.24 365.00 - 223 - 65 -

Pastures - - 60.00 - - - 27 -

Orchards 22.56 - - - - - - -

Forest - 0.00 - - - - - -

Village Ponds - 15.00 5.00 - - 4 10 -

Check dams (area treated) - 27.00 - - - 8 38 -

Community Buildings - - 32 - - - 2 -

Weekly Markets - - - - - - - -

Permanent markets - - - - - - - -

Temples/ Places of worship - - - 16 - - - -



3.3 Socio-Economic Profile

Table no. 21: Demographic information

S.R. No. Village

Population

SC

ST

Total

Male

Female

Total

Male

Female

%

Total

Male

Female

%

1

Dungarpur 3536 1883 1653 1362 720 642 38.52 139 76 63 3.93

2 Ivnagar 2156 1149 1007 969 516 453 44.94 40 19 21 1.85

3 Khadiya 4248 2266 1982 507 267 240 11.93 106 52 54 2.49

4 Palasva 2587 1361 1226 330 179 151 12.75 11 7 4 0.43

5 Patapur 1149 618 531 277 148 129 24.11 24 10 14 2.09

6 Vijapur 2435 1278 1157 140 72 68 5.75 50 26 24 2.05

Table no. 22: Literacy rate

S.R.

No.

Village Literacy

Literacy % above age 14

Literacy % below age 14

Total

Total

%

Male

%

Female

%

1

Dungarpur 1826 51.64 1105 31.25 721 20.39 34.45 17.19

2 Ivnagar 1295 60.06 772 35.80 523 24.25 44.20 15.86

3 Khadiya 2808 66.10 1642 38.65 1166 27.44 49.48 16.62

4 Palasva 1801 69.62 1038 40.12 763 29.50 53.00 16.62

5 Patapur 758 65.97 446 38.82 312 27.15 51.26 34.03

6 Vijapur

1640 67.35 954 39.18 686 28.72 51.25 16.10

3.3.1 Migration Pattern: Migration is moderate in the cluster villages. The main reason of migration is availability of alternatives to agriculture like

diamond polishing, tile making, cement making and wage labour. The youth in the villages generally prefer to work in these occupations because they want

to enjoy the town-life. This is equally evident for those young people who have patriarchal agricultural land. Agriculture seems to lose its sheen to other

non-farm occupations for the youngsters in the villages.



Table no. 23: Migration details

S.R.

No.

Village

Total population

Migration

Migration by months

Main reason for migration

Income during migration /

month

Total

Total

Male

Female

Up to 3 months

3-6 months

More than 6 months

1 Dungarpur 3536 34 21 13 19 5 10

Better

employment

prospects

Rs5000-6000

2

Ivnagar 2156 132 93 39 60 20 52

3 Khadiya 4248 85 59 26 51 13 21

4 Palasva 2587 69 45 24 38 15 16

5 Patapur 1149 44 31 13 26 6 14

6 Vijapur 2435 62 37 25 43 9 10

Table no. 24: Poverty

S.R. No. Village

Total Household

BPL % o f B P L H H

Total Land less

HH

% of land less HH

0-16

0-16

16-20

Total

1

2

Dungarpur 719 176 371 547 76.07 718 99.86

2 Ivnagar 425 150 66 216 50.82 110 25.88

3 Khadiya 932 124 76 200 21.45 400 42.91

4 Palasva 538 43 70 113 21.00 420 78.06

5 Patapur 214 16 80 96 44.85 136 63.55

6 Vijapur 509 55 24 79 15.52 319 62.67

3.3.2 Infrastructure facilities

All the watershed villages are well connected with Junagadh taluka through pucca roads. Each village has electricity connectivity. Nearly 96 per cent

of households in the villages have their personal electric meters. All villages have primary and Secondary school with some facilities like drinking water and

libraries but there is lack of advance & technological facilities like personal computers and R.O. systems for drinking water.



Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

S.R. No.

Village

Pucca road to

the village (Y/N)

Schools

Colleges (Num.)

Post Office (Distance in kms)

Banks (Num.)

Distance from

nearest market

yard

Milk collection

centre (Number)

Milk cooperative (Number)

Other cooperative

s /CBIs (Number)

Any other institution

LP

UP

HS

1

2 Dungarpur Y Y Y Y N 8 1 15 0 1 N N

2

Ivnagar Y Y Y Y N 3 0 10 1 1 N N

3 Khadiya Y Y Y Y N 12 0 12 1 1 N N

4 Palasva Y Y Y Y N 7 0 10 1 1 N N

5 Patapur Y Y Y N N 12 0 12 1 + 2 1 N N

6 Vijapur Y Y Y Y N 12 0 8 1 1 N N

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets

S.R. No.

Village

HHs with electricity

HHs with safety

latrines

HHs with phones

HHs with vehicle

HHs with TV set

HHs with cooking

gas

HHs with Drinking

water

HHs with

fridge

Landline

Land line

Mobile

2 -wheeler

4- wheeler

1

2 Dungarpur 671 60 17 531 24 2 474 375 56 12

2

Ivnagar 417 375 20 305 112 2 316 150 385 65

3 Khadiya 918 810 245 844 163 12 780 200 895 89

4 Palasva 537 425 130 503 180 17 480 200 513 82

5 Patapur 213 160 60 198 45 5 185 90 213 17

6 Vijapur 506 400 150 391 137 9 394 394 509 44



3.4 Livelihood pattern:

The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry, agriculture and wage labour. Another major occupation of the people is business, service

and diamond polishing industries in Junagadh.

Table no. 27: Yearly Income

S.R. No. Village

Agriculture (in Rs.)

Animal husbandry

(in Rs.)

Casual labour

(in Rs.)

Others

(Services&

Business,

Pensioner)

(In Rs.)

Total (in Rs.)

1 Dungarpur 45000 17000 11660600 357600 12076600

2 Ivnagar 3004000 150000 5368100 2696600 11218700

3 Khadiya 10452500 100000 11221000 3905300 126667800

4 Palasva 3458000 246000 7601500 2258200 13563700

5 Patapur 3075000 83000 2278000 248000 5742000

6 Vijapur 4863000 202000 5718000 1747800 12530800

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR (Not Applicable)

S.R. No. Village Benefit type 1 Benefit type 2 Benefit type 2 Total

income % sells Income % sells Income % sells Income

1 Dungarpur NA

2 Ivnagar NA

3 Khadiya NA

4 Palasva NA

5 Patapur NA

6 Vijapur NA



Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

S.R.

No. Village

Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal

husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture

+ AH

Agriculture/

Casual

labour

Services Handicraft/

Business Others(Pensioner)

1 Dungarpur 719 7 1 3 694 4 15 4

2 Ivnagar 433 100 5 8 248 14 52 6

3 Khadiya 959 310 4 27 532 16 58 12

4 Palasva 557 119 9 19 358 11 36 5

5 Patapur 231 78 4 13 118 2 16 0

6 Vijapur 533 190 7 24 261 12 32 7



CHAPTER - 4

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES



4.1 Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy has been adapted by Government of India especially in the rain fed regions of semi-arid tropics. These regions

are characterized by low and undepependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of migration. The

inheritant low fertility of crops results in lower productivity of crops which have a very low biological efficiency.

Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The common

guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.

4.1.1 Scientific Planning:

I) Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The project consists of sixteen

micro-watersheds namely 5G1C4c1g, 5G1C4c1f, 5G1C4c2b, 5G1C4c2a, 5G1C4c3a, 5G1C4c3b, 5G1C4c2c, 5G1C4c2d, 5G1C4c3d, 5G1C4c1c,

5G1C3b1h, 5G1C4c1h, 5G1C4c1j, 5G1C4c1g, 5G1C4c1d, 5G1C3b1e as their respective codes.

ii) Base line Survey

(a) Door to Door Survey

The primary data was generated through questionnaire surveys in all the villages. The questionnaire was structured so as to derive the information related

to the objectives set forth. Mostly talked to

• Head of the families

• Mostly females (between 60% and 70%)

• Mostly younger adults (Age group : 25 – 44)



• High School education

• Sarpanch and Talati of respective Gram Panchayats.

• Farmers, Agricultural labours, Diamond polishing workers, ceramic factory workers etc.

• Cattle Breeders

• Landless labour

The questionnaire was divided into eleven modules through which information is extracted pertaining to

1. Village details

2. Population details

3. Water supply details

4. Water source details within and outside the village

5. Questions about community engagement

6. Questions about Livelihood

7. Awareness about Specific programme: Watershed

8. Desire to do more activities related to occupation

9. Productivity of farms

10. Education details

11. Questions about Land



The secondary data was obtained through Census reports (2001). Data pertaining to social profile is also collected through Census reports. Secondary

data related to different kinds of capital assets were collected from different departments of Government agencies such as Revenue Office, Primary Health

Center, Regional Marketing Center, Regional Forest Center (Van Sanrakshan Samiti), District Rural development Agency initiative-SGSY Programme

office, working on poverty alleviation, Village Panchyat, other NGOs and development societies etc.

b) Field to field Survey:

Field to field survey was also carried out in the farms, community land, pasture land and land under Gram Panchayat. It also includes the soil

profiles, no of wells in the area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field. The details of agriculture

as well as pasture land of the village, where the existing structures and structures to be proposed were note down. Almost all the farmers of the village were

there to support the survey team. The purpose of the survey was also to understand water availability, patterns of water use and peoples’ understanding &

perceptions about both surface and groundwater resources in this area. Village agreements will be done on the basis of such detailed work. This also survey

looked at the pattern of surface and groundwater use and the basic understanding of farmers regarding groundwater recharge and discharge. This

understanding was expected to help in improved planning for any watershed programme and to develop longer-term protocols of groundwater management

in respective areas.

iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

In order to understand the social, economical and political aspect of all selected villages of Junagadh taluka, we conducted Participatory Rural

Appraisal (PRA) exercise with the help of the villagers on 08th

July 2010 and +respectively. It was really a useful tool to appreciate the village in its totality.

We had the opportunity to interact with more than 150 numbers of people in Patapur and 320 in Dungarpur village and vice versa. To reach a concrete

conclusion we requested to few villagers for focused discussion and it was entertained. In majority of the discussion, we listened to them carefully and tried

to appreciate the discussion. Output generated through these exercise is placed below.



(a) Resource Map: - Through resource map we came to know about all the residential pattern of village, community pasture land, farm areas, about the

river etc. It also gave us a fair idea about the pasture land, other land distribution pattern and different resources of the village.

(b) Social Map: - After this exercise we came to know the approximate location of different institution of the village. During this exercise we also had

informal discussions with the participants about the importance of these institutions. Important location pointed out during this exercise was Community

Centre, Panchayat Bhavan, temple, Primary School etc. We cross checked all the location.

(c) Seasonal Diagram: - With this exercise we came to know about the major engagements of villagers across the twelve months of the year. We found

that rain fed agriculture and animal husbandry keep them busy at least for seven to eight months of the year. About drinking water they informed that,

situation in the month of April to June is really difficult.

(d) Crop Pattern: - Agriculture is the primary source of livelihood for more than 75% household. After this exercise we came to know that there are

two major cropping pattern Kharif and partially in Rabi. Under Kharif groundnut and Under Rabi major crops grown are wheat and vegetables.

(e) Income-Expenditure Pot: - Under this exercise we came to know about the different sources of income of villagers and how the money earned by

the villagers is being spent under different heads. It was found that major source of earning among villagers are farming, animal husbandry, different kinds

of business, service etc. Major expenditure component were food, fuel, education of children, medicines, clothes, festivals etc.

One focused group discussion was organized to understand the status of different Self Help Groups operating in the village. This discussion concentrated

around the activities of SHG, terms and conditions of membership, working pattern of different SHG and their role in the development of society and

villages.

Another curiosity in our mind was about the political institution of the village. Apart from different institution’s discussion was concentrated about

gram panchayat issue. Here the major point of discussion was participation of women and deprived section of the society in the decision making process,

their representation in the panchayat. In what manner the panchayat facilitates the process of development and poverty alleviation. In this process its relation

with different institutions of village like Dispensary, Aanganwari, Primary School and High school was also discussed.



The whole purpose was to identify the employment opportunities available during the different seasons in a year, income, expenditure, crisis

management, daily activities and time allotted to each activity, the leisure time of men and women, and market network for agricultural produce etc. In the

gender analysis, an attempt was made to find out the gendered division of labour, the status of women in relation to the right to use, to own and sell different

household properties, the means of production of the household and the role and participation of women in decision-making at intra household and

community levels.

To identify different problems faced by villagers a separate focused discussion was carried out. The villagers were grouped in to different types as

shown below to know all the details of the village in a stipulated time.

Business men and women

Small and marginal farmers

Large farmers

Landless farmers

Women

Gram Panchayat members

Cattle grazing population



(f) Problem Identification

After analysis the information collected during PRA exercise, the main problems identified are as under:

Poor fertility of farm land

Improper Crop soil and productivity low agricultural

Soil Erosion from Rotation

Almost negligible cultivation of arid fruits

Less use of bio-fertilizers

Less cultivation of vegetables

Low milk production and rearing of non descript breeds

No use of vermin compost

Lack of value addition practices

Lack of purification of Drinking Water

No near by Market

Migration

Sanitation Problems

Less Nutritional Level

Malnutrition in few families



iv) Use of GIS and remote sensing for planning

Remote sensing and GIS plays an important role in the study of natural resources and helps in planning water resources development. One of the

greatest advantages of using remote sensing data for hydrological investigations and monitoring is its ability to generate information in spatial and temporal

domain, which is very crucial for successful analysis, prediction and validation. Use of various high-tech tools has been promoted & implemented at various

stages of watershed development

a) Prioritization

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL

Population, SC/ST population, Ground Water Status, Drinking water situation and Slope percent. These were all given proper weightage according to the

DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.

b) Planning

An action plan matrix was been formulated by State Level Nodal Agency(SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil depth, soil

texture, soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land.

Global positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This will be used to create

a map. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various location specific for soil and water conservation

structures.

c) Hydrological modelling

Hydrology modelling technique has been used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink-flow accumulation. This model overlaid over

cadastral map held to calculate the catchment area of each structure like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error which generally

occurring while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.



Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific

criteria was used

(A) Planning

Cluster approach Yes

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute

Baseline survey Yes

Hydro-geological survey Yes

Contour mapping Yes

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover Yes

Ridge to Valley treatment Yes

Online IT connectivity between

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes

Availability of GIS layers

1. Cadastral map Yes

2. Village boundaries Yes

3. Drainage Yes

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status)

5. Land use Yes

6. Ground water status Yes

7. Watershed boundaries Yes

8. Activity Yes

Crop simulation models#

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil

nutrient analysis



Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)#

Weather Station

(B) Inputs

1. Bio-pesticides

2. Organic manures Yes

3. Vermincompost Yes

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes

5. Water saving devices

6. Mechanized tools/ implements

7. Bio-fencing Yes

8. Nutrient budgeting

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers

Any other (please specify)

4.2. Institution Building

I) Watershed Committee (WC)

This is the general body of the residents constituted by Gram sabha of the watershed as well as farmers who own land within the

watershed area registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha meetings were held in first week of July, where the

watershed committees were formed taking in to account all caste, women representation and Gram panchayat members. Both President and

Secretary of WC were selected after the first Watershed Committee meeting was held. The secretary will be a paid functionary of the

watershed committee. The Watershed Committee with the help of the Watershed Development Team (WDT) shall facilitate resource-use

agreements among the user groups based on the principle of equity and sustainability. Capacity building training to the watershed committee will

be provided by WDT member. The watershed committee has a pivotal during various processes like the PRA and overall planning of various points.



4.2.1 Watershed Committee Details.

Table no. 31.1 : Watershed Committee details (Patapur)

Names of

WC

Date of

Registration

as a Society

(dd/mm/

yyyy)

Name

Designatio

n M/F SC

S

T SF MF LF

Land-

less UG

SH

G GP

Educatio

nal

qualificat

ion

Function/s

assigned#

Watershed

committee

Patapur

Under

progress

Lakhubhai H. Dhandhukia President M - - Y Y SSC B,E

Chandubhai M. Dholariya Secretary M - - SSC C,D,I

Kalubhai P. Bhadarka Member M - - Y primary B

Shobhanaben A. Parmar Member F Y - Y primary H

Motiben R. Bhadarka Member F - - Y primary B

Pareshbhai G. Kikani Member M - - Y - H

Govindbhai B. Satani Member M - - Y primary G

B. K. Chocha Forester M - - B.A. D ,E,G,

Lakhmanbhai B. Dhandhukia Member M - - Y primary C,F

Bhagubhai J. Dhandhukia Member F - - Y Y - E,D

Chandrakantbhai V. Vaja Member M - - Y primary I,G

Raniben R. Pampaniya Member F - - Y primary I,G

Polabhai B. Mewala Member M - - primary H

Anjanaben J. Kikani Member F - - Y primary A

Dineshbhai B. Solanki Member M - - Y primary A



Table no. 31.2: Watershed Committee details (Khadiya)

Names of

WCs

Date of

Registrati

on as a

Society

(dd/mm/

yyyy)

Name

Designatio

n M/F

S

C

S

F MF LF

Land

-less UG

SH

G GP

Any

other

Educatio

nal

qualificat

ion

Function/

s

assigned

#

Water shed

committee

Khadiya

Under

progress

Kalabhai H. Bhadarka President M Y Y T.Y B,E

Rambhai A. Bhadarka Secretary M SSC C,D,I

Zanziben A. Dhola Member F Y Y Primary B

Vinaben J. Chudasama Member F Y Y Primary H

Asuben D. Makrani Member F Y Primary A

Mamtaben R. Chandiya Member F Y Y Y Primary H

Samjubhai D. Dobariya Member M Y Primary G

V. S. Kher Forester M Old SSC D ,E,G,

Dineshbhai G. Karangiya Member M Y Primary C,F

Bhikhabhai M. Chauhan Member M Y Primary E,D

Rajeshbhai A. Dangar Member M Y Primary I,G

Maldebhai K. Ravaliya Member M Y Primary I,G

Mansukhbhai L. Varu Member M Y Primary H

Manojbhia H. Ravaliya Member M Y Primary A

Karabhai K. Dhul Member M Y Primary A



Table no. 31.3: Watershed Committee details (Dungarpur)

Names of

WCs

Date of

Registration

as a Society

(dd/mm/

yyyy)

Name

Designatio

n M/F

S

C

S

F MF LF

Land

-less

U

G

SH

G GP

Any

other

Educational

qualificatio

n

Function/

s

assigned#

Water shed

committee

Dungarpur

Under

progress

Haribhai P. Parmar President M Y Y HSC B,E

Babubhai K.Gohel Secretary M

Y Y

High

school C,F.

Lalitaben H. Parmar Member M Y Y Y SSC A

Jebunben M. Bloch Member F Primary A

Natubhai R. Kaba Member M Y Primary B,H

Lilaben M. Vanar Member F Y Primary A

Bhanubhai T. Jhala Member M Y Y Primary G

B. K. Chocha Forester F B.A. D,E,G,

Rahimhai H. Bloch Member M Y SSC C,D,I

Vasrambhai R. Virsodiya

Member M Y Y Y Y

High

school E,D



Table no. 31.4 Watershed Committee details (Ivnagar)

Names of

WCs

Date of

Registrati

on as a

Society

(dd/mm/

yyyy)

Name

Designatio

n M/F SC SF MF LF

Land-

less UG

SH

G GP

Any

other

Educationa

l

qualificatio

n

Function

/s

assigned

#

Watershed

committee

Ivnagar

Under

progress

Vrijlalbhai J. Bhut President M Y HSC B,E

Bharatbhai K. Chavda Secretary M Y SSC C,D,I

Prabhudasbhai T. Makwana Member M Y SSC A

Dhirubhai R. Tank Member M Y Y Primary A

Hansaben H. Parmar Member F Y Y Primary B,H

Jinabhai P. Khoda Member M Y Y Primary A

Kantilal B. Makwana Member M Y Y Primary G

P. T. Kaneriya Forester M B.A. D,E,G,

Rameshbhai V. Parmar Member M Y Y

High

school C,F

Amritlal D. Faldu Member M Y

High

school E,D

Shantaben R. Tilava Member F Y Y primary I,G



Table no. 31.5: Watershed Committee details (Plasawa)

Names of

WCs

Date of

Registrati

on as a

Society

(dd/mm/

yyyy)

Name

Designatio

n M/F

S

C

S

F MF LF

Land

-less

U

G

SH

G GP

Any

other

Education

al

qualificati

on

Function/s

assigned#

Water shed

committee

Plasawa

Under

progress

Bhikhabhai S. Savaliya President M Y Y HSC B,E

Nikunjbhai V. Gami Secretary M SSC C,D,I

Swatiben M. Maru Member F Y Y Y SSC A

Harsukhbhai H. Dobariya Member M Y Y Primary A

Ramnikbhai P. Maru Member M Y Y Primary B,H

Chetanaben D. Purohit Member F Primary A

Manishaben V. Ajakiya Member F Y Y Primary G

P. T. Kaneriya Forester M B.A. D,E,G,

Mansukhbhai V. Dobariya Member M Y

High

school C,F

Jayentbhai M. Mevada Member M Y Y

High

school E,D



Table no. 31.6: Watershed Committee details (Vijapur)

Names of

WCs

Date of

Registrati

on as a

Society

(dd/mm/

yyyy)

Name

Designatio

n M/F

S

C

S

F MF LF

Land

-less

U

G

SH

G GP

Any

other

Education

al

qualificati

on

Function

/s

assigned

#

Water shed

committee

Vijapur

Under

progress

Mohanbhai H. Yadav President M Y Y HSC B,E

Rekhaben B. Solanki Secretary F Y SSC C,D,I

Hasrajbhai K.Barvadiya Member M Y Y SSC A

Vijayprakashbhai J.

Sondarva Member M Y Y Primary A

Narmadaben L. Tank Member F Y Primary B,H

Bababhai R. Sindhav Member M Y Y Primary A

Madhuben B. Agravat Member F Y Primary G

B. K. Chocha Forester M B.A. D,E,G,

Samatbhai V. Kalathiya

Member M Y High

school C,F

Parbatbhai A. Rathod

Member M Y High

school E,D

# Functions Assigned, as below

A. PNP and PRA B. Planning

C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments

E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation

G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed

I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).



4.2.2 : Self Help Group

We believe that the full potential of our watershed work can only be raised if it is supplemented by a microfinance programme.

This is essential if we are to ensure long-term livelihood security to the poor. We are also convinced that no microfinance programme

can be successful until it is tied up with livelihood programmes such as agriculture, dairying, marketing and enterprise development etc.

Thus microfinance and livelihood programmes are complementary to each other and their simultaneous implementation is the key to

poverty alleviation. Incomes rose through livelihood initiatives need to be saved. Of these women are the best custodians. Self Help

Group is motivated, small homogenous group organized together through highly successful of credit and thrift activities. These savings must be

reinvested in livelihood options that in turn raise incomes, setting up various cycles. Generally self help group includes landless and marginal

sized farm women, BPL household, SC/ST women.

Before formation of the Self Help Group’s discussions were held with the women of the village during Participatory Rural Appraisal activities and Focus

Group Discussion. The participants came out with their problems very well.

Table no. 32: SHG detail

S.R. No.

Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category

No. of BPL in each

category

With

only

Men

With only

Women

With

both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

Total 7 12 13 32

(I) Landless 115 164 279 0 12 12 27 22 49

(ii) SF 20 14 34

(iii) MF 8 2 10

(iv) LF 7 0 7

Total 150 180 330 0 12 12 27 22 49



4.2.3 : User Group:

These are homogeneous groups of persons having landholding within the watershed area. They are normally formed to manage an activity or asset

on a long term basis. The user group collects user charges from their members. Some of the points which were considered while forming a user group

were:

1) In case of a check dam all the beneficiaries of the individual check dam were involved as user group members.

2) Groundnut grading user groups

3) Paper dish making user groups

4) Vermin composting user groups

5) Animal Husbandry user groups

Focused group discussion was conducted to between the user groups to discuss the above conditions and to select potential members. It was advocated

that each group to formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.

Table No. 33: The following types of groups were planned to be formed

S.R. No.

Name of User Group

Major Task

1

Animal Husbandry Group

Bringing of new AH technology

Management of New Cattle and their improvement

2 Farm pond/Percolation tank user Group

Equitable sharing of resources

3 Farm bund and Check Dam Group Equitable sharing of resources

4 Nursery Group

Maintenance of nursery plot

Ensure Timely supply of seedling for afforestation.

5 Micro-enterprise developing group Ensuring livelihood opportunities, reducing distress migration



Table no. 33.1: UG detail

S. R. No.

Total no. of UGs

No. of members

No. of SC/ST in each category

No. of BPL in each category

Men

Women

Both

Total

Categories

M

F

Total

M

F

Total

M

F

Total

1

12

0

7 19

[I] Landless

20

45

52

23

1

24

5

2

7

(ii) SF 48

10

18

(iii) MF 45

1

15

18

(iv) LF 7

1

0

17

120

70

105

23

1

24

5

2

7

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP-6

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA)

EPA activities are certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community. This helps in establishment of credibility of watershed

Development Team (WDT). It also acts as a rapport building activity of the village community. A group Discussion was conducted with watershed

Development Committee regarding the EPA activity; it was conveyed to the amount of Rs. 23.93 lakh in SIX cluster village of Junagadh cluster was

allotted for Entry Point Activity, which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but

after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can taken, which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into

priority that there should be an instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.



Table No. 34: Some of the major activities proposed in Palasava are:

Name of

Villages

Details of activity Amount earmarked for EPA Estimated Cost ( In

lakhs)

Palasava

R.O. Plant in high school

5.06 Lakhs

0.30

Renovation in Gaushala 0.75

Water Tank repairing(1 no) 0.20

Fencing in Smashan Gruh 1.00

Water pipeline 1.90

Plantation 0.45

Solar light 0.45

Total 5.05

Table No. 34.1: Some of the major activities proposed in Vijapur are:

Name of Villages

Details of activity

Amount earmarked for

EPA

Estimated Cost ( In lakhs)

Vijapur

Plantation along road with tree guard (No110) 3.07Lakhs

1.10

Water pipeline(300 rmt) 1.82

Aveda Renovation 0.15

Total 3.07



Table No. 34.2: Some of the major activities proposed in Patapur are:

Name of Villages Details of activity Amount earmarked for EPA Estimated Cost ( In lakhs)

Patapur

Fencing in Smashangruh

2.11 Lakhs

0.35

Bath place for Smashangruh 1.35

Solar light 0.25

Plantation 0.15

Total 2.10

Table No. 34.3: Some of the major activities proposed in Khadiya are:


Khadiya

Water pipeline

8.51 Lakhs

2.05

Aveda Renovation 0.35

Protection wall of Smashangruh 1.90

Water tank (30,000 later) (No.-2) 4.20

Total 8.50

Table No. 34.4: Some of the major activities proposed in Dungarpur are:


Dungarpur Bath place for Smashangruh

2.39 Lakhs

1.35

R.O.Plant in primary school (nos.3) 1.00

Total 2.35



Table No. 34.5: Some of the major activities proposed in Ivnagar are:


Ivnagar Repairing of Drinking water pipe line 800rm

2.42 Lakhs 2.42

Total 2.42

4.3.2. Watershed Development Works:

Watershed development works is to be done during implementation phase of watershed. Treatments begin from the highest point of the watershed and move

progressively downwards (ridge to valley), starting with the smallest stream and culminating in the main river of the watershed. Work is location-specific, varying

according to slope and geology as also the size of the stream being treated. The aim is to weave interventions into the contours of nature, not to seek mastery over it.

A net budget of 50 percent is allotted for this work.

Drainage line Treatment Plans

It is very important to treat the undulating part of the land in watershed area to conserve water and soil from erosion. This involves mainly agriculture and pasture

land of that region in the watershed. Various water harvesting and managing structures should build to arrest the erosion and degradation of soil .

1. Check dam

2. Check dam cum cause-way

3. Pakka plug

4. Village pond

5. Protection wall



CONSTRUCTION OF CHECK DAM

1.0 INTRODUCTION :-

The IWMP scheme consists of a new check dam across river stream local near village PLASAWA of junagadh clusters in JUNAGADH District.

2.0 HISTORY OF THIS SCHEME:-

The preliminary site investigation were carried out in the month of JUNE-2010 and the survey work for the proposed site was carried out in the month july-

2010.During investigation it was found that the flow in river being in-adequate for carrying the water by canal system it was not possible to construct a weir

or storage scheme and check dam is proposed.

3.0 LOCATION AND SELECTION OF SITE :-

The proposed site situated near village Patapur. At the proposed site the river is having20.00 meters horizontal and2.50 meters vertical banks. The site is

suitable for check dam as it is having sufficient No. of wells to be benefited if the check dam is constructed the stream bed comprises of Hard murram is met

at the depth of 1.00 meters from lowest bed level and the banks comprises of soil, S.R. & H.R. Strata. It is assumed that the wells coming within periphery of

half mile from check dam site will be benefited the high flood water not reaming within the banks before construction hence there is over flanking of water

but not damaging any surrounding, If, check dam is constructed across the stream and the flood water over flow but will no damage, surrounding and hence

provision for land acquisition is not made in the detailed estimate, and A.H.F.L. (GPS POINT – N-2127.445,E-7027.479)

4.0 HYDROLOGICAL DATA :-

The catchments area at the proposed site is1.25 Sq.Km. as shown in the index plan. The monsoon flow remaining up to December Month every year during

normal monsoon. The maximum flood discharge is 343.600calculated it comes to success by S.P.F. formula.



SALIENT FEATURES

1. Name of River Local River

2. Catchment area 1.25 Sq.Km.

3. Discharge 343.60 cusecs.

4. Length of check dam 20.00 meters

5. F.S.L. R.L. 99.08 meters

6. Bed Level R.L. 98.08 meters

7. Foundation of body R.L. 96.78 meters

8. Top width of body : 1.00 meters

9. Bottom width of body 2.00 meters

10. Apron width 2.00 meters

11. Top apron R.L. 97.83 meters

12. Foundation of apron R.L. 97.55 meters



13. L/s. key wall 2.00 meters

14. R/s. key wall 2.00 meters

15. Benefits Rising of water table of area

Coming ½ mile radis. coming ½ mile radis.

16. Irrigation 43 Hect.

17. Estimated quantity Estimated quantity :



DISCHARGE CALCULATION+

(Stand Project Flood)

Discharge as per S.P.F. = Q = 29.402 (C.A.)0.9232

Where C.A. = Catchment area = 1.25 Km2

Q = 29.0402 (1.25) 0.9232

= 343.6cumecs.

Discharge as per managing formula H Let as assume.F.L. at site is equal to bank level R.L. Meters.

CH. AGL. HFL. F. MD. DIST. AREA

00 99.08 99.08 0.00 0.00 - -

4 98.43 99.08 0.65 0.325 4 0.325

8 97.25 99.08 1.83 0.915 4 0.915

12 97.55 99.08 1.53 0.765 4 0.765

16 99.98 99.08 0.9 0.45 4 0.45

20 99.96 99.08 0.88 0.44 4 0.44

TOTAL 20.0M. 2.895M2



Area = 2.895 M2 = 31.145 Ft2

Perimeter = 12 M.

Hydraulic mean depth R = A = 2.895 = 0.24 M

P 12

Velocity according to Mannigs formula V = 1 R2/3

S½

N

Where N = co-eff. of Rughecity

= 0.03

R = Hydraulic Mean Depth

= 0.24

S = Bed Slop

I = 0.06

V = 1.35 M/sec.

Discharge Q = A x V

= 2.895 x 1.35

= 3.9Cum / Sec.

= 3.9 x 35.31

= 137.6cusecs.


Detailed Project Report – I.W.M.P.-6, JUNAGADH PAGE 65

Calculated and provide check dam with following features.

Due to over flanking of river banks the H.F.L., A.H.F.L. can’t determine and hence calculation regarding A.H.F.L. scour depth, Hydraulic jump, apron,

stability at A.H.F.L. are not

1. Length : 20.00 M.

2. F.S.L. : R.L.99.08 M.

3. Foundation of body : R.L.95.63

4. Apron : 4.00 M

5. Apron top : R.L.97.83 M

6. Apron flood : R.L.98.25

CALCULATION FOR SCOUR DEPTH

Maximum flood discharge = 137.6 cusecs.

Length of check dam = 20.00 M

Discharge per feet run = D = Q = 137.6 = 2.09feet

L 20(3.28)

Scour depth R = 0.9 (d) = 0.9 (2.09)

= 1.88 feet

= 0.56 M.



CALCULATION FOR HYDRAULIC JUMP AND APRON

Flood discharge = 137.6 cusecs.

Length of check dam = 20.00 M

Discharge per feet run = D = Q = 137.6 = 4.195

L 32.8

Difference of head = A.H.F.L. - Bed level

= 100.83 - 98.08

= 2.75m

= 9.02 feet

Now Velocity = V1 = 0.90 2 gh

= 0.90 2 x 32.20 x 9.02

= 21.69 feet / sec

Now d1 = h1 = 9.02 = 0.415 feet

v1 21.69

& d2 = (d1)2 + 4(d1)

2 (v1)

2

2 2 gd1

d2 = (0.415)2 + 4(0.415)

2 (21.69)

2

2 2 x 32.20 x 0.415



d2 = 3.30 feet.

Now Found Number f = V1 21.69

gd1 32.20 x 0.415

= 1.27 > 1 O.K.

Which is grater thane one.

Hence hydraulic jump will occur.

Now thickness of apron = t = d2 - d1 x w

2 w2-w1

Where w1 = wt. of water = 1.00 t1m3

w2= wt. of masonary = 2.40 t1m3

t = 3.30– 0.415 x 1.00

2

= 1.44feet

LENGTH OF APRON

L = 5 (d2 - d1)

L = 5 (3.30 – 0.415)

= 14.42 feet = 4.39 M



As site condition provided 4.00 M apron width.

1.NAME OF RIVER /VOKALA :- LOCAL VOKALA

2.LENGTH OF CHECKDAM :- 20.00 MT.

3.CREST LEVEL R.L. :- 99.00 MT.

4.H.F.L. :- 99.08 MT.

5.HEIGHT ABOVE G. L. :- 2.20 MT.

6.TOP WIDTH :- 1.0 MT.

7.BOTTAM WIDTH :- 2.0 MT.

8.SLOPE 1:20

9.CATCHMENT AREA 1.25.00 SQ.KM

1. Percolation well:

It is the structure made in water way of river, vokala or in small stream for harvest the surface run-off water and increase ground water

table and its technical details are under:

1 Increase ground water table

2 Reduce soil erosion

3 Creating a hydraulic head locally which enhances infiltration of surface runoff into the groundwater system.



ITEM NO.:- 1

PERCOLATION WELL EXACAVATION & DEWATERING

Excavation for Well including removing And spreading the excavated stuffs directed with

Lead up to 90m.

(1) in all soils including hard murrum

(2) in soft rock

(3) in hard rock with blasting and chiseling or by shiseling only for finishing.

S.O.R. Page. 102

NO. SOIL ITEM QTY RATE PER AMOUNT

1 MURRUM 0.0M to 1.5M DEPTH 14.42 46.00 CUM. 663.32

2 H.ROCK 1.5M to 3.0M DEPTH 14.42 272.00 CUM. 3922.24









TOTAL Rs 50873.76

ADD 2% CONTI. Rs 1017.47

TOTAL Rs 51891.23

SAY Rs 52000.00



Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S.

No.

Name of

villages

Initiation of

village level

institution

Capacity

building IEC activities

Baseline

survey

Hydro-geological

survey

Identifying

technical support

agencies

Printing DPR

and Mapping

Estimated Cost

(Rs. in lakh)

1 Dungarpur 0.40 2.99 0.75 0.35 0.35 0.40 0.56 5.80

2 Ivnagar 0.45 3.02 0.75 0.33 0.40 0.50 0.60 6.05

3 Khadiya 1.60 10.64 3.15 0.90 0.90 1.89 2.12 21.20

4 Palasva 1.25 6.33 1.30 0.65 0.90 0.91 1.26 12.60

5 Patapur 0.50 2.64 0.40 0.29 0.40 0.50 0.52 5.25

6 Vijapur 0.70 3.84 0.90 0.45 0.50 0.50 0.76 7.65



Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in Dungarpur (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S.

No.

Type of

structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing

structures

Construction of new structures Total target Expected month

& year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

No. Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

(Cumec)

Estimated

cost

(Lakhs)

No. Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

(Cumec)

Estimated

cost

Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

Estimated

cost

1 Pakka plug 0 0 0 0 15 10 10000 7.50 10 10000 7.50

2 check dam 0 0 0 0 1 4 4000 2.00 4 4000 2.00

3

Causeway

cum check

dam

0 0 0 0 1 5 4000 9.50 5 4000 9.50

Total 0 0 0 0 17 19 18000 19.00 19 18000 19.00



Table no.36.1: Activities related to Surface water resources in Ivnagar (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Type of

structures

Proposed target


structures

Construction of new structures Total target Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

No. Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

(Cumec)

Estimated

cost

(Lakhs)

No. Area to

be

irrigate

d (ha)

Storage

capacity

(Cumec)

Estimated

cost

Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storag

e

capacit

y

Estimated

cost

1

Percolation

well 0 0 0 0 1 4 1400 0.52 4 1400 0.52

2

Causeway &

excavation of

streamlet

0 0 0 0 1 5 2000 2.00 5 2000 2.00

3

Causeway

cum check

dam

0 0 0 0 1 6 4500 4.50 6 4500 4.50

Total 0 0 0 0 3 15 7900 7.02 15 7900 7.02



Table no.36.2: Activities related to Surface water resources in Khadiya (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Type of

structures

Proposed target


structures


month & year

of completion

(mm/yyyy)

No. Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

(Cumec)

Estimated

cost

(Lakhs)

No. Area to

be

irrigate

d (ha)

Storage

capacity

(Cumec)

Estimated

cost

Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

Estimated

cost

1 Check dam 1 8 3300 2.00 2 10 6000 10.50 18 9300 12.50

2

Causeway

cum check

dam

0 0 0 0 1 5 3000 10.00 5 3000 10.00

3 Causeway 0 0 0 0 4 15 8000 15.00 15 8000 15.00

4 Support wall

in cause way 0 0 0 0 1 1 1000 0.50 1 1000 0.50

Total 1 8 3300 2.00 8 31 18000 36 39 21300 38.00



Table no.36.3: Activities related to Surface water resources in Palasawa (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Type of

structures

Proposed target


structures


month & year

of completion

(mm/yyyy)

No. Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

(Cumec)

Estimated

cost

(Lakhs)

No. Area to

be

irrigate

d (ha)

Storage

capacity

(Cumec)

Estimated

cost

Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

Estimated

cost

1 Causeway 0 0 0 0 1 3 1500 0.50 3 1500 0.50

2

Causeway

cum check

dam

0 0 0 0 3 15 16000 9.48 15 16000 9.48

3 Check dam 0 0 0 0 3 14 9000 7.00 14 9000 7.00

4 Village Pond 3 10 30000 9.75 0 0 0 0 10 30000 9.75

Total 3 10 30000 9.75 7 32 26500 16.98 42 56500 26.73



Table no.36.4: Activities related to Surface water resources in Patapur (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Type of

structures

Proposed target


structures


month & year

of completion

(mm/yyyy)

No. Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

(Cumec)

Estimated

cost

(Lakhs)

No. Area to

be

irrigate

d (ha)

Storage

capacity

(Cumec)

Estimated

cost

Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

Estimated

cost

1 Check dam 1 4 3500 2.50 1 5 4500 4.00 9 8000 6.50

2 Causeway 1 3 3200 1.50 1 5 5300 6.00 8 8500 7.50

3 Percolation

Tank 0 0 0 0 1 8 8950 1.25 8 8950 1.25

Total 2 7 6700 4.00 3 18 18750 11.25 25 25450 15.25

Table no.36.5: Activities related to Surface water resources in Vijapur (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No. Type of

structures

Proposed target


structures


month & year

of completion

(mm/yyyy)

No. Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

(Cumec)

Estimated

cost

(Lakhs)

No. Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

(Cumec)

Estimat

ed cost

Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Storage

capacity

Estimated

cost

1 Check dam 0 0 0 0 1 7 4500 2.80 7 4500 2.80

2 Causeway 1 3 3000 1.50 1 5 4000 2.50 8 7000 4.00

Total 1 3 3000 1.50 2 12 8500 5.30 15 11.50 6.80



Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

SR.

No.

Name of

Villages

Type of

structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of

existing recharging structures

Construction of new recharging

structures

Total target

No. Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Estimated

cost

No. Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Estimated

cost (lakhs)

Area to

be

irrigated

(ha)

Estimated

cost (lakhs)

1 Dungarpur Open wells 0 0 0 3 24 0.75 24 0.75

2 Ivnagar Open wells 0 0 0 16 79 4.00 79 4.00

3 Khadia Open wells 0 0 0 55 123 13.75 123 13.75

4 Plasawa Open wells 0 0 0 4 17 1.00 17 1.00

5 Patapur Open wells 0 0 0 28 87 7.00 87 7.00

6 Vijapur Open wells 0 0 0 23 53 5.75 53 5.75

Total for the Project 0 0 0 129

383 32.25 383 32.25



Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

S. No. Names of

Villages

Major activities of the SHGs & UGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from activity

per SHG (In Rs. Approx)

1 Dungarpur

Mandap Service 1 75000

Horticulture 1 60000

Soda maker unit 1 200000

Detergent Powder 1 75000

Incense Sticks Unit 1 40000

Dairy & Milk processing products 1 250000

2 Ivnagar

Neem Product unit 1 50000

Papad making unit 1 110000

Mandap Service 1 300000

Tutti frutti unit 1 75000


3 Khadiya

Buffalo farming 1 160000

Tutti fruit unit 1 100000

Carpenter unit 1 100000

Candle making unit 1 80000



Potato product 1 90000

Paper dish bowl making 1 70000

Groundnut processing & packaging 2 80000


Mineral water unit 1 70000

Bookstore 1 70000

Soda maker unit 1 70000

Handy craft unit 1 85000

4 Plasava


Paper dish making 1 70000


papad makimg unit 1 80000

Gul kandh making unit 1 50000

Aloevera processing 1 90000

Book binding unit 1 75000

5 Patapur


Paper dish making 1 70000

Pickle making unit 1 80000





6 Vijapur

Detergent powder 1 60000

Book banding unit 1 60000

Pickle makimg unit 1 80000

Potato making unit 1 70000



Table 38.1: Details of allied /other activities - PATAPUR

S.

No.

Name of

village Name of activity

Type of land

Executing

agency Target

(I)

Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG

Estimated

cost Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

(ii)SHG

(Rs. in

lakh)

(iii) WC

Livelihood Intervention

1 PATAPUR

Kitchen garden Kits Private Community UG/SHG 1.20

Dairy & milk processing products Community SHG 1.25

Paper Dish and Bowl Making Unit Community SHG 1.10

Pickle making unit Community SHG 0.85

Incense Sticks Unit Community SHG 0.90

Total 5.30



Production System and Microenterprise Development

PATAPUR

Papad making unit Community UG/SHG 1.00

Sprinkler System demo Private UG 1.65

Drip Irrigation Demostration Private UG 1.55

Vermin Composting Private UG 1.20

Veterinary Camp Community UG/SHG 1.45

Total 6.85



Table 38.2: Details of allied /other activities - KHADIYA

S.

No.

Name of

village

Name of activity Type of land Executing

agency

Target

(I)

Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG Estimated cost Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

(ii)SHG (Rs. in lakh)

(iii) WC


2 KHADIYA

Kitchen garden Kits Community UG/SHG 4.20

Papad making unit Community SHG 2.60

Handicraft unit Community SHG 2.25

Bookstore unit Community SHG 1.85

Carpenter unit Community SHG 1.55

Groundnut Grading Unit Community SHG 4.25

Paper dish-bowl making unit Community SHG 1.60

Sari & Cloth unit Community SHG 1.10

Mineral Water unit Community SHG 1.85

Total 21.25




KHADIYA

Auto rickshaw Unit Community UG/SHG 2.00

Book Binding Unit Community SHG 1.00

Buffalo Farming Unit Community SHG 4.50

Potato Product Unit Community SHG 1.00

Soda maker Unit Community SHG 1.75

Veterinary Camp Community 3.20

Vermin Composting Private UG 2.80

Drip Irrigation Demostration Private UG 3.25

Floriculture Private UG 2.25

Horticulture Private UG 3.95

Plant Distribution Community SHG/UG/WC 1.75

Total 27.45



Table 38.3: Details of allied /other activities – VIJAPUR

S.

No.

Name of

village


agency

Target

(I)

Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG Estimated

cost

Expected month

& year of

completion

(mm/yyyy) (ii)SHG

(Rs. in

lakh)

(iii) WC


3 VIJAPUR

Potato product unit Community SHG 1.30

Detergent powder unit Community SHG 1.35

Pickle making unit Community SHG 1.30

Book binding unit Community SHG 0.60

Masala unit Community SHG 1.50

Kitchen garden Kits Private Community UG/SHG/WC 1.60

Total 7.65


VIJAPUR

Sari & Cloth unit Community UG/SHG 3.00

Veterinary Camp Community UG/WC 2.25

Veterinary kits Community SHG/UG/WC 3.10


Total 9.95



Table 38.4: Details of allied /other activities – PALASVA

S. No. Name of

village


agency

Target

(I)

Private

(ii) Community (iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG Estimated cost Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

(ii)SHG (Rs. in lakh)

(iii) WC


4 PALASVA

Kitchen garden Kits Community UG/SHG/WC 2.40

Allover processing unit Community SHG 6.00

Paper dish Bowl Making Community SHG 1.60

Book binding unit Community SHG 1.10

Gulkand Making Unit Community SHG 1.25

Total 12.35



PALASVA

Dairy and Milk Process

Product Community UG/SHG 1.95

Rose Farming Community UG 1.45

Vermin Composting unit Private UG/SHG 2.10


Veterinary camp Community 1.50

Drip kits Private UG 2.90

Nursery Private UG/SHG 1.60


Total 16.45



Table 38.5 : Details of allied /other activities – IVNAGAR

S.

No.

Name of

village

Name of activity

Type of land

Executing

agency Target

(I) Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG

Estimated

cost Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

(ii)SHG

(Rs. in

lakh)

(iii) WC


5 IVNAGAR

Dairy and Milk Process Product Community UG/SHG 1.10

Kitchen Garden Kits Community UG/SHG/WC 1.40

Tutti Futti Unit Community UG 0.85

Mandap service unit Community SHG 1.80

Neem Product unit Community SHG 0.90

Total 6.05


IVNAGAR

Papad Making Unit Community SHG 0.95


Veterinary Camp Private UG/SHG 1.70


Lemon Plantation Private UG 0.75

Drip Irrigation demo kits Private UG 1.00

Total 7.85



Table 38.6 : Details of allied /other activities – DUNGARPUR

S.

No. Name of village Name of activity

Type of land

Executing

agency Target

(I) Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG

Estimated

cost Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

(ii)SHG

(Rs. in

lakh)

(iii) WC


6 DUNGARPUR

Incense Sticks Unit Community SHG 0.90

Detergent powder Unit Community SHG 0.90

Mandap Service Unit Community UG/SHG 2.75

Kitchen garden kits Community SHG/WC 1.40

Total 5.95




DUNGARPUR

Dairy and Milk Processing Product Community SHG 1.55

Soda maker unit Community SHG 1.10

Chikoo Plantation unit Community UG 0.80

Veterinary camp Private UG 1.60


Drip Irrigation demo Private UG 1.10


Total 7.80



Table no. 39: Details of engineering structures in watershed works: Dungarpur

SR.

No.

Name of

structure

Type of

treatment

Type of land Executing

agency

Target

I) Ridge

area (R)

(ii)

Drainage

line (D)

(iii)

Land

dev

(L)

(I)

Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG

(ii) SHG

(iii) WC

No. of

units

(No./

cu.m./

rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in

lakh)

Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

M W O T

1 Farm

bunding L P UG/WC 152.4

0.75

2 land

levelling L P UG/WC 11 0.33

3 farm fencing

L P UG/WC 2500 3.12

Total 4.20



Table no. 39.1: Details of engineering structures in watershed works: Ivnagar

SR.

No.

Name of

structure

Type of

treatment


agency

Target

I) Ridge

area (R)

(ii)

Drainage

line (D)

(iii)

Land

dev

(L)

(I)

Privat

e

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG

(ii) SHG

(iii) WC

No. of

units

(No./

cu.m./

rmt)


lakh)

Expected

month &

year of

completi

on

(mm/yyy

y)

M W O T

1 Farm bunding L P UG/WC 2700 1.35

2 land levelling L P UG/WC 80 2.43

3 farm fencing L P UG/WC 5200 6.50

5 .

Total 10.28



Table no. 39.2: Details of engineering structures in watershed works: Khadiya

SR.

No.

Name of

structure

Type of

treatm

ent


agency

Target

I)

Ridge

area

(R)

(ii)

Drainage

line (D)

(iii)

Land

dev

(L)

(I)

Privat

e

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG

(ii) SHG

(iii) WC

No. of

units

(No./

cu.m./

rmt) Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)

Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

M W O T

1 Waste weir D L P UG/WC 5 6.84



4 farm fencing L P UG/WC

20800

26.00

Total 41309 58.34



Table no. 39.3: Details of engineering structures in watershed works: Palasawa

SR.

No.

Name of

structure

Type of

treatm

ent


agency

Target

I)

Ridge

area

(R)

(ii)

Drainag

e line

(D)

(iii)

Land

dev

(L)

(I)

Privat

e

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG

(ii) SHG

(iii) WC

No. of

units

(No./

cu.m./

rmt)


lakh)

Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

M W O T

1 Waste weir D L P UG/WC 15 2.28




Total 28144 34.76



Table no. 39.4: Details of engineering structures in watershed works: Patapur

SR.

No.

Name of

structure

Type of

treatme

nt


agency

Target

I) Ridge

area (R)

(ii)

Drainage

line (D)

(iii)

Land

dev

(L)

(I)

Privat

e

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG

(ii) SHG

(iii) WC

No. of

units

(No./

cu.m./

rmt)


lakh)

Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

M W O T

1 Waste weir R D L P UG/WC 14 2.10




Total 3775 6.59



Table no. 39.5: Details of engineering structures in watershed works: Vijapur

SR.

No.

Name of

structure

Type of

treatm

ent


agency

Target

I)

Ridge

area

(R)

(ii)

Drainage

line (D)

(iii)

Land

dev

(L)

(I)

Privat

e

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG

(ii) SHG

(iii) WC

No. of

units

(No./

cu.m./

rmt)


lakh)

Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

M W O T




4

Total 11.28



Table no. 39.6: Details of engineering structures in watershed works (All Village) :

S.

No.

Name of

structures

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency

Target

(I)

Ridge

area

(R)

(ii)

Drainage

line

(iii) (I) (ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG No. of

units

(No./

cu.m./

rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs.

in lakh)

Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/yyyy)

(D)

Land

dev

(L)

Private (ii)SHG

(iii) WC M W O T

1 Waste weir L P UG/WC 74 11.22

2 Farm bunding D L P UG/WC 41301 21.64

3 Land levelling L P UG/WC 1152 35.02

4 Farm fencing L P 86000 107.49

Total: 175.37



Plains or Flat level:

Farm bunds are constructed on agricultural land with the aim of arresting soil erosion and improving the soil moisture profile. Ideally, bunds on

farms should be made on the contour line. But this creates several problems for farmers. Contour bunds divide the field into irregular sections. In such

a situation, it becomes inconvenient to maneuver bullocks for operations such as plugging and line-sowing. Due to these difficulties, what is normally

practiced in the name of farm bunding is bunding along the field boundaries.

Table No 40: Technical Details/Estimates of Farm Bund

Estimate of cost : Farm Bunding

Particulars Value Unit

Top width 2.00 Mt

U/S Slope 1: 1:1.5

D/S Slope 1: 1:1.5

Max. height 2.00 Mt

Bottom Width 8.00 Mt.

Area of cross section of Farm Bund 10.02 Sq mt

Qty. of earthwork of Farm bund /Meter 10.02 Cumec

Rate /cumec 50.00 Rs.

Total cost of Farm bund per mt. 41.41 RS

Total Length of farm bunding Mt

Cost of Farm bunding Rs



Drainage line Treatment and water harvesting:

The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally agricultural land or waste lands. These are generally water conservation or surface

water storage structures. These being highly labour intensive will involve more of manual labour so schemes like National Rural Employment Guarantee

Scheme (NREGS) can be taken. Following structures has been proposed in the project villages.

1. Percolation tank/ Pond

2. Waste Weir

3. Afforestation

B). Percolation Tank: Percolation dams are constructed for recharging groundwater. Such structures are usually made on the upper part of the catchment

area. Water stored here percolates to wells and tube wells located in the lower part of the catchment. Such dams can also be made in the immediate

upstream portion of wells and tube wells. Depending on the capacity of the dam and duration of water storage, the dam can have secondary benefits (such

as pisciculture) that are vital for the livelihood security of marginal farmers and landless labourers.

Table no 40.1. : Technical details of Percolation Tank or village pond

Particulars

Value

Structure Length

900.00

Mt.

Structure Height

2.00

Mt.

Upstream Slope

1:1.5

:1

Downstream Slope

1:1.5

:1

Bund Top Width

2.00

Mt.

Structure Base Width

8.00

Mt.

Structure Cross Section

10.00

SqMt.



Table no.41. : Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Dungarpur

SR.

No.

Name of

village

Name of

structure/

work


agency

Target

(I)

Ridge

area

(R)

(ii)

Drainage

line

(iii)

Land

dev.

(L)

(I)

Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG Area

(ha)

No. of

plants

Estimated

cost

Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/ yyyy)

1

Dungarpur

Afforestation L C 2 2184 3.00

2 Agro-forestry

Tree guard L p C 1 8000 1.50

Total 4.50



Table no.41.1: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Ivnagar

SR.

No.

Name of

village

Name of

structure/

work


agency

Target

(I)

Ridge

area

(R)

(ii)

Drainage

line

(iii)

Land

dev.

(L)

(I)

Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG Area

(ha)

No. of

plants

Estimated

cost

Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/ yyyy)

1

Ivnagar

Afforestation L C 3.5 1872 4.06

2 Crop. Demo. L C 1 180 1.15

3 Agro forestry

+ tree Guard L P 1 1.60

Total 6.81



Table no.41.2: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Khadiya

SR.

No.

Name of

village

Name of

structure/

work


agency

Target

(I)

Ridge

area

(R)

(ii)

Drainage

line

(iii)

Land

dev.

(L)

(I)

Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG Area

(ha)

No. of

plants

Estimated

cost

Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/ yyyy)

1

Khadiya


2 Agro forestry

+ tree guard L p 1

1.50

Total 5.50



Table no.41.3: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Plasava

SR.

No.

Name of

village

Name of

structure/

work


agency

Target

(I)

Ridge

area

(R)

(ii)

Drainage

line

(iii)

Land

dev.

(L)

(I)

Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG Area

(ha)

No. of

plants

Estimated

cost

Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/ yyyy)

1

Palasva


2 Crop. Demo. L C 1 180 1.35

3 Agro forestry

+ tree Guard L p 1

1.20

Total 6.55



Table no.41.4: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Patapur

SR.

No.

Name of

village

Name of

structure/

work


agency

Target

(I)

Ridge

area

(R)

(ii)

Drainage

line

(iii)

Land

dev.

(L)

(I)

Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG Area

(ha)

No. of

plants

Estimated

cost

Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/ yyyy)

1 Patapur Plantation L C 1.5 180 2.00

Total 2.00



Table no.41.5: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works: Vijapur

SR.

No.

Name of

village

Name of

structure/

work


agency

Target

(I)

Ridge

area

(R)

(ii)

Drainage

line

(iii)

Land

dev.

(L)

(I)

Private

(ii)

Community

(iii)

Others

(pl.

specify)

(I) UG Area

(ha)

No. of

plants

Estimated

cost

Expected

month &

year of

completion

(mm/ yyyy)

1

Vijapur

Plantation L C 0.4 185 1.50

2 Agro-Forestry

+ tree Guard L P 2 2.50

Total 4.00



Table no. 42. : Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works – Proposed target

S.

No.

Name of

village Afforestation

Agro

forestry

Crop. Demo

(Plantation)

Total

ha lakh Ha lakh ha lakh ha lakh

1 Dungarpur 2 3.00 1 1.5 3 4.5

2 Ivnagar 3.5 4.06 1.5 1.60 1 1.15 6.15 6.81

3 Khadiya 2.5 4.00 1 1.5 3.5 5.5

4 Palasva 1.5 4.00 1 1.2 1 1.35 3.5 6.55

5 Patapur 1.5 2.00 1.5 2.00

6 Vijapur 2 2.50 0.4 1.5 2.43 4.00

29.36

Table no. 43. Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas.

Table no. 43.1 Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas.

Sr. No. Name (s) of the

Villages

CPR particulars Activity Proposed Target

Target area under

the activity (ha.)

Estimated

expenditure (Rs.)

Expected no. of

beneficiaries

1 Dungarpur Afforestation 2184 2 3.00 Community

Agro forestry +Tree

guard

8000 1 1.5 Community





Villages


Target area under

the activity (ha.)

Estimated

expenditure (Rs.)

Expected no. of

beneficiaries

1

Ivnagar Crop. Demo 180 0.45 1.15 Community

Afforestation 1872 3.5 4.06 Community



Villages


Target area under

the activity (ha.)

Estimated

expenditure (Rs.)

Expected no. of

beneficiaries

1 Khadiya Community

Vermin Composting-2

unit

2 0.50 2.00 UG/SHG






Villages


Target area under

the activity (ha.)

Estimated

expenditure (Rs.)

Expected no. of

beneficiaries

1

Palasva Crop Demo. 180 1 1.35 Community




Villages


Target area under

the activity (ha.)

Estimated

expenditure (Rs.)

Expected no. of

beneficiaries

1 Patapur Crop Demo. 180 1.5 2.00 Community



Villages


Target area under

the activity (ha.)

Estimated

expenditure (Rs.)

Expected no. of

beneficiaries

1 Vijapur Plantation 0.4 1.5

Afforestation 4368 2 2.5 Community

Horticulture 2000 1.2 1.60 UG/SHG/WC



Table 44: Technical Details of Afforestation Activities

Particulars Value Unit

Crop Name

Pelt forum spc.

Plant To Plant Spacing 8.00

mt

Row to Row Spacing

8.00

mt

Pit Length

1.00

mt

Pit Width

1.00

mt

Pit Depth

1.00

mt

No. of Plants

156

Nos.

Plantation Area

1.00

Ha.

No. of Plants for (1 ha )

156

Nos.

Gap Filling

20

%

Table 44.1: Cost Estimation for afforestation activity

S. No.

Description

No.

Lengt h(m.)

Width (m.)

Depth (m.)

Unit

Quantity

Rate

Amount

1

Digging of pits for plants in Ordinary murum

156

1

1

1

Cum

156.00

50

7800

2

Plants saplings for plantation in Govt. pasture area, sapling not less than 30 cm. height

156

Nos.

156.00

10

1560

3

Transportation of plants from nursery to camp site upto 5Km

156

Nos.

156.00

1

156

4

Loading and unloading of plants

156

Nos.

156.00

1

156

5

Rehandling of plants from camp site to actual planting site upto

20Omt.

156

Nos.

156.00

1

156

6

Cost of fertilizer & insecticides incl. application

156

Nos.

156.00

10

1560

7

Weeding and Hoeing two times (Twice in year]

156

Nos.

156.00

2

312

Total

11700



MICRO ENTERPRISE – 1

PAPER DISH-BOWL MAKING UNIT

Introduction

Paper dish making unit is a low investment activity that has a good market potential in the nearby villages of our cluster. The unit requires very low

amount of capital investment and unskilled workers can easily handle the SHGs &UGs groups. The raw material is laminated paper which is available in

bulk from the nearby market. There is a good level of demand for the product but only a few units are present in Junagadh for manufacturing paper dish

bowls.

Project Cost:

Sr.

No.

Particular Price (Rs.)

A) Machinery and Equipments

1 Machine 30000.00

2 Furniture 15000.00

3 Other instruments 10000.00

TOTAL 55000.00

B) Postage, telephone, stationery, transportation etc 3100.00

Grand Total :- 58100.00

Production Cost (Monthly)

1 Raw Material 2000.00

2 Power fuel charge 500.00

3 Packing 120.00

4 Repairs and maintenance 250.00

5 Unskilled workers 400.00

6 House Rent 500.00

7 Others 200.00

Total : - 3970.00



Total Production (Monthly)

Sales price of 1 paper bowl dish – Rs 2.00

Paper bowl dish sheaths (5000) 10000.00

Cost Benefit Ratio (Monthly)

Monthly Selling income 10000.00

Production Cost 3970.00

------------

Total monthly income will be Rs. 6030 6030.00

Benefits:

No training is required to undertake this activity and unskilled workers can easily take up the machine work.

The time taken to roll out paper dish is very less and the quantity churned out per day is high. The machine is

available at cheap prices



MICRO ENTERPRISE -2

VERMI COMPOSTING

Vermin composting is an eco-friendly technology. Application of vermin-culture technology in the recycling of Seri cultural waste and other

wastes has a tremendous potential. It is estimated that, by recycling (3) times in a year the farmer may get approximately 15 tones of vermin compost

manure.

Vermin composing is a technology of using earthworms as versatile natural bio-reactor for rapid conversion of any organic wastes under value

added manure. The earthworms feed on the wastes of organics origin, which is rich in NPK, micro nutrients, enzymes and vitamins suitable for crop

growth besides number of useful micro organisms.

S. No

Particulars

Quantity

Rate (Rs.)

Amount (Rs.)

1 Super Structure construction with truss with fencing 128750

2 Shade net for covering the roof

750 sqrt mt.

25

18750

3 Binding wire for tying

200 Kg

50

10000

4 Labour charges for erection of sheds

100

100

10000

5 Shovels, spades, crowbars, iron baskets etc

15000

6 Weighing scale (100 kg capacity)

1

2500

2500

7 Cow dung @ 80kg/m3

96 qtl

250

24000

8 Worms

200 kg

70

14000

9 Formation of vermin bed with agro-waste, cow dung and worms

50000

10 Miscellaneous

-

-

3000

11 Training 5000

Total cost

-

-

Rs. 281000



Returns from vermicomposting (BENEFITS)

1. Sale of vermin compost of 120 tones @ Rs.3000/- per ton

120 X 3000 = 360,000 Rs

2. Sale of worms @ 5 kg per ton of compost and Rs. 50 per kg

600 X 50 = 30,000 Rs

3.Total

3,90,000 Rs/-

Net benefit

1,09,000 Rs/-

Technical Support/Assistance:

To ensure proper technical support for Vermicomposting and smooth functioning of activities the required technical assistance may be taken from

Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK's), Dept. of Agriculture, Junagadh.

Advantages:

The importance of a vermicomposting can be well understood. The vermicomposting will provide much needed relief and self-reliance to poor in

the village especially on agriculture depended farmers. Specifically, the advantages are:-

> It will reduce migration during summer season.

> Farmers can purchase and sale of vermincompost at village level, thus doing away with costs incurred by them to carry out these transactions at the

city market.

> It can reduce in overall market prices of fertilizers during the lean season.

> Reduced distress of soil due to chemical fertilizers.

> Improves the physical and chemical health of the soil.

> Improves fertility of soil and thereby increases the crop production.

> Higher incomes per capita.

> Increase employment opportunities at the village level associated with the sale and purchase vermin compost.



MICRO ENTERPRISE - 3 BAKERY UNIT

Introduction

Bakery food items have gained popularity with the youngsters and are now a part of daily snacks in all parts of the country.

The rural pockets have also been influenced by it and bakery products are available in villages through multiple channels. The

demand for these products is rising in the rural areas and in almost all parts of Gujarat, bakery products are consumed on a large

scale.

Freshness, taste and quality are the three important parameters for bakery products. The business is lucrative in our project

cluster due to the availability of raw materials in the villages. We are taking up this activity in Khadiya after repeated discussions

with the villagers through FGD's and PRA's.

Training and exposure visits will be provided to the entrepreneurs at renowned bakeries like Monogynies & Agriculture

university of Gujarat Motibaug -Junagadh.



PRODUCTION SYSTEM - 1

PAPAD MAKING UNIT

For women to become a successful entrepreneur, she needs access to capital, technical and managerial know-how and market. The

essence to empower rural women lies in catalyzing appropriate economic activities at the grass root level and creating new opportunities for

them to earn higher income in order ton improve their standard of living. This objective could be accomplished by establishing that are

based on the locally available resources and preferably indigenous knowledge. SHG, each with 10-15 members, will be motivated and

training will be provided for each micro enterprise activity which will improve the quality of their own lives as well as the lives of those

around them.

Introduction

Papad is delicious & tasteful Snack. It is consumed at hotels, malls, restaurants, homes, shops etc. Papad is a traditional item consumed

in all functions. Traditionally this activity this activity was confined to household papad making but in view of increasing demand and

availability of machinery it has now been development in cottage and small scale sector.

Manufacturing Process

Generally weighed quantity of floor is taken in a mixer. Ingredients required for Papad making are Black gram, oil, sodium carbonate,

flour of Arhar dal. A solution of common salt and carbonates is added in requisite quantity of water and the contents are kneaded at maximum

speed to get a homogenous lump of the dough. After resting the dough for 30 minutes, it is divided into balls. These are pressed into circular

discs. Corn starch can be used as dusting material to prevent stickiness. The papads are usually dried. After drying, it is packed in various size

packing. Lot of 25 or 50 papads is then packed in polythene bags. Papad can be manufactured from different varieties of pulses or there could

be a combination of pulses as well.



Market

Field survey findings indicated that papad industry has good potential in cities like Junagadh, Bhavnagar and Rajkot. There is a good demand for

papads because it is a food product and commonly consumed commodity in all households and hotels. Women entrepreneurs can gainfully take up this

papad unit in their houses but proper packing and distribution network is necessary to sell in bulk quantities.

Production Capacity

Monthly approximately 300 kg papad can be produced.

Static Capital Investments:

A) Land/Infrastructure :

A person can start his activity in his own/ rented house by using Approx. 150 Sq. Ft. carpet area.

Sr. No. Particular Price (Rs.)

B) Machinery and Equipments

1 Mixing and rolling machine 24000.00

2 Weighing machine 3000.00

3 Packing machine 2000.00

4 Set for papad making 1000.00

5 Furniture 5000.00

6 Other instruments 1000.00

TOTAL 36000.00

C) Postage, telephone, stationery, transportation

etc

3000.00

Grand Total :- 39000.00



D) Production Cost (Monthly)

1 Raw Material 16000.00

2 Power fuel charge 600.00

3 Packing 150.00

4 Repairs and maintenance 250.00

5 Unskilled workers 2100.00

6 House Rent 500.00

7 Others 300.00

Total : - 19900.00

Total Production (Monthly)

1. Papad 300 Kg X Rs. 137/Kg 41100.00

Cost Benefit Ratio (Monthly)

Monthly Selling income 41100.00

Production Cost 19900.00

------------

Total monthly income will be Rs. 21200.00 21200.00

The unit can be taken up by landless, small farmer and land with limited farm labour, thus making it most suitable to the project

villages, and the scheme will be taken up in such a manner that there should be no marketing problem, as they will be consumed

directly by the near by villages or cities. Training will be provided to the beneficiaries and the content is shown below.



Training Content

A. Theoretical

• Introduction to different types of papads.

• Tools and Equipments used in papad making

• The processes involved in papads making.

• Dough making - variations in shapes, size, and flavor.

• The hygiene aspects associated with food products..

• Addresses of the suppliers of raw materials, & packaging materials.

• Development of Market.

B. Practical

• Introduction to the machinery and equipments used.

• Raw materials for papad making – the quality and variety.

• Dough making and the value addition in the form of flavors.

• Bringing about variations in shapes and sizes.

• Papad & Chips making – Practical

• Drying and Preservation

• Cost considerations and waste reduction.

• Deciding Pricing

• Packaging



PRODUCTION SYSTEM – 2

DETERGENT POWDER UNIT

Introduction:

Washing powder has a special formula of enzymes and achieves oxygen to give outs tending clean clothes while maintaining their texture and color.

Washing & Detergent powder has a perfect formulation that not only gives great clean but also is gentle to both hand & cloth. Its special low leather

formulation works well in top and front landing machines without damaging it and its regular. Usage. Washing powder also helps the user to wash more

number of garments than the traditional washing detergents it tackles tough stains like tea, curry, oil, grease etc. with extreme ease.

Packing Sizes = 100gm , 200gm, 250gm, 500gm, 1kg, 2kg, 5kg. More

Formula: 1) Active Matter

2) Sodium Tri Phosphates (STPP)

3) Other Phosphate

4) Sodium Chloride

5) Perfume

6) Color Brand Name: Detergent

35%w/w Minimum

Lemon /Sky Blue/White & More....

Market :

PRA and FGD indicated that Washing Powder unit has good potential in all cities & villages. There is a big demand for washing powder in

every house. So it is easily sold at both Retailer and Whole seller shops near our cluster. Thus this washing powder unit gets good profit.




INCENSE STICKS UNIT

Introduction:

The term Agarbatti originates from the “Agar” or Aloes wood, the original incense which became synonymous with the word and “bathi” meaning

stick. We offer a wide range of incense sticks packets that are available in a pleasing fragrances.

.

Manufacturing system:

The manufacture of Incense is both a science and an art. Varieties of Incense are composed of diverse leaves, flowers, roots, barks, woods, resins,

gums and oils. We employ people from industry who have the best know-how in the field of manufacturing Ince4nse products. These experts are

Equipped with a production setup consisting of latest machines to manufacture, test and pack the finished goods.

We have made arrangements so that extreme winters and monsoons do not affect our production of incense stick our team of perfumers does not

just create a new perfume; they aim to create a sensation. With a large palette of raw materials that allow more. There is no need to higher educated people.

Market:

Focus Group Discussion & Participatory Rural Appraisal & Field Survey finding indicated that Agarbatti unit has good potential in each and

every villages & cities. There is a big demand for Agarbattis because it is commonly used in all temples, households, shops , offices , hotels etc. It has

Get easily market not only in wholesale but also in retail. By analysis we know that this unit gets more profit by less hard work and in lower time.




MASALA UNIT

INTRODUCTION:

We are taking up the Masala unit in Vijapur village after discussion with villagers (men & women) through PRA’s and FGD’s. The demand of

this unit is rising in the rural areas and almost in all over district and state. Thus we offer a wide range of Masala Products. Today, we see the wide uses of

different kinds of Masala products in each and every households, restaurants, hotels, wedding party, different kinds of catering service unit etc. It is

available in all types of packing size like 25 gm, 50 gm, 100 gm, 200gm, 400gm, 500gm and more. There is a good demand for Masala unit in every

villages and cities. It is sold at whole sale and retail shops. So the production of Masala unit gets good market and better profit.

PRODUCTION LIST OF DIFFERENT KINDS OF MASALA:

1. Sambhar Masala 9. Amchur Masala

2. Vada Masala 10. Dal Masala

3. Pakoda Masala 11. Pani Puri Masala

4. Phudina Masala 12. Curry Masala

5. Tea Masala 13. Garam Masala

6. Pav bhaji Masala 14. Jal –Jeera Masala

7. Chana Masala 15. Kitchen King Masala

8. .Chat Masala 16. Biriyani Pulav Masala



AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMME

Our understanding is that without addressing the crucial area of end-use regulation, no amount of rainwater harvesting is going to work. For this the

most important requirement is the working out of a sustainable package of practices for dry land agriculture. This is moreover an alternative to the Green

Revolution, which largely bypassed the dry lands or is completely inappropriate for them. It is believed that the economy must be viewed as a sub-system

of the larger eco-system, which comprises not merely human beings but also natural resources and non-human species.

The watershed village area has seen penetration of Green Revolution (GR) inputs in agriculture, which is the main occupation of the people.

Groundnut that was the main crop of the area is becoming completely unviable because of high pesticide costs. Despite excessive use of pesticides,

pestilence remains an intractable problem. The inputs available to them are often sub-quality. For example, local dealers dispose of expired pesticides to

illiterate farmers. Farmers are in general suffering because of high input costs. However, their problem is that they perceive no alternative to the GR

package. What is worse, the catchment areas have suffered severe denudation of forest cover in recent years. This has raised the rate of soil erosion and

surface runoff. Biodiversity has also been adversely affected. There is a fodder and fuel crisis in the area. Within this context, our attempt (see Figure

below) is to forge several new links within the elements of the natural resource base of the area (climate, rain fed agriculture, wastelands, forests, and crop

residues, animal and human wastes and decentralized energy sources). With soil and water conservation technologies, surface runoff is minimized which

improves the level of soil moisture. Loss of essential soil nutrients is also reduced and harvested runoff is recycled to agricultural land through water

harvesting structures. The utilization of soil moisture through vegetative systems strengthens the flows of fodder, firewood. Non-woody biomass from the

regenerated forests and commons, as well as part of the crop residues, is returned to the soil through microbial decomposition. Re vegetation of the

commons also provides material for direct incorporation into soil as green manure.



These are the major components in the agricultural programme to be carried out in the Programme:

Seed distribution

Seed multiplication

Trials and Demonstrations

Screening of new varieties

Popularization of a package of agricultural practices

Floriculture

Horticultural plantation

Non Pesticide Management

Vermicomposting

Phoenix/date palm plantation along the stream banks on farm bunds

Jatropha plantation along fencing and on wastelands

Afforestation



Our effort has been to introduce a complete alternative to hybrid seeds and the Green Revolution package and practices as listed above. As a trial of the

recommended practice of intercropping of different crops, farmers of the project area were chosen for Front Line Demonstrations (FLDs). These

demonstrations attempt to make certain type of crop varieties popular again by showing the possibility of intercropping with a cash crop. The model, thus,

attempts to show the households the possibility of getting some extra cash income while ensuring food security. In collaboration with ICRISAT,

Hyderabad, Junagarh Agricultural University, KVK-Kodinar, Junagadh, we will carry out trials of composite varieties of different crops as trail or

demonstration plot. Seeds of varieties identified as suitable to the area will be disseminated to more than 100 farmers in watershed villages. Then attempt is

to a comparative assessment of some of these varieties based on a detailed feedback obtained from the farmers of the area. This feedback will be then

provided to scientists who devised these seeds.

Training and Exposure visits

A large group of people, consisting mainly of women dairy farmers who will take loans for purchase of cattle, will visit the successful dairy

cooperatives under the Amul Dairy, Dudhsagar dairy and Banas dairy. These cooperatives were chosen mainly for the reason that many of the successful

dairy farmers in these areas are small farmers belonging to various communities. These dairies had also built up their business on the hard work of women

farmers who had taken loans from the SHGs run by the cooperative union to buy cattle. The interaction will be helpful as dairy co-operative members in

other district will make them to understand how those women, with a similar background, had been able to build up a good livelihood option revolving

around the dairy.

Training addressing the issue of infertility in animals will be provided to beneficiary group. Three day training cum exposure visit will be organized

for the team and some farmers to the BAIF organization. The visit will provide a first hand view of the options open to dry land farmers to ensure the

availability of good quality fodder. The farmers who had adopted such practices demonstrated how it could help in cutting down the cost of feed

concentrates.



One day training on azolla cultivation, as a means of providing high protein feed to livestock, will be organized by KVK. Scientist from the KVK

will demonstrate the simple method by which azolla could be grown in the backyard of farmers. Demonstration pits are expected to set up in the

demonstration plot of farmers.

Livelihood Intervention Promotion of micro-enterprises and various income generation activities is an important aspect of empowerment. Although it is extremely difficult

to find remunerative self employment, there are enormous untapped opportunities in the rural sector. These include both on-farm and off-farm

opportunities. Typically families living below poverty line, SC, ST and landless in a cluster of villages are motivated to take part in holistic development

through livelihood opportunities through multidisciplinary interventions.

Advantages of Agro-Based Activities:

While promoting various income generation activities, agro-based activities have advantages because of the following reasons:

1. Target groups are acquainted with most of the basic skills.

2. Easy access to inputs.

3. No problems of marketing, as most of the outputs are locally consumed as food.

4. As over 50-60 % of the rural families own land and livestock, income generation activities can be initiated immediately without heavy capital

investment.

5. Risk of failure due to improper technology, poor quality, low demand and poor price recovery are very low. Hence, the chances of success are high.

6. Infrastructure required for promotion of on-farm activities has been very well established. Hence, the entrepreneurs can progress even in backward

regions,



Which are deprived of regular power supply and electronic information connectivity. It is therefore advantageous to tap all the opportunities to promote

various on-farm activities. The experience has confirmed that the best strategy to promote income generation activities through SHGs is to analyze the on-

going agro-based activities undertaken by the members and introduce suitable interventions to enhance the production. There are also excellent

opportunities to improve post production management of the produce through grading, storage, processing and marketing.

Various micro-enterprises activities through UG and Self Help Groups will be promoted. The list of micro-enterprises taken up by various SHGs is

presented below. Among these activities, agriculture followed by animal husbandry, Khadi making units and food processing. However, over a period of

time, agriculture, animal husbandry and food processing supersede the trade as many individuals participate in enhancing their production at the family

level and try to organize themselves to market them collectively. Other activities such as production of utility items, construction related activities,

handicrafts and Moti work find it difficult to sustain due to poor marketing infrastructure, lack market and competition from other sources.

Support Needed for Promotion of Micro-enterprises

Following support is needed to promote micro-enterprises through women SHGs.

1. Motivation of the target communities, particularly women and landless farmers

2. Formation of Self Help Groups and their Federations

3. Gender sensitization

4. Training and capacity building

5. Micro-finance. Provision of credit facilities and linkage with banks

6. Development of infrastructure, particularly through the SHG Federations to provide necessary support services and marketing

7. Trade networking and establishment of market outlets

8. Village level Information Centre: The multi-disciplinary team interacted with the SHGs and User groups to explore the potentials for development of

various enterprises and extend necessary support for dissemination of technologies, procurement of inputs, and training of members and establishment of

linkage with the market. There should be some agency to provide guidance to the entrepreneurs as and when needed.



The selected production activities for the watershed villages follow the above-mentioned process, and are selected in such a way that they should be:

economically viable

environmentally sustainable

socially equitable

energy efficient

employment generation

For any policy or resolution to be passed

Enhanced control due to

Floriculture

Floriculture industry a lucrative business comprising traditional flowers , cut flowers, pot plants, dry floral crafts and planting materials, besides

value-added products like bouquets, garlands, floral baskets, floral concretes, pot-pourii and oils. It has proved to be a highly profitable agro-business

generating maximum returns per unit area. Flowers like Rose, Marigold, and ------ can be profitably cultivated. Rose and marigold fetch very high prices in

the local market and many farmers in their homestead gardens. This can be a good alternative and economic crop for the small stakeholders. The per unit

returns from marigold and rose is expected to be very high.

4.4 Capacity building and Institutional collaboration

Watershed management and development requires the collaboration of a wide range of farmers’ organizations as well as extension and research

institutions at various levels. This gives implementers access a wider technical resource base, creates better information flows and encourages mutual

learning. Watersheds serve as a confluence between lands and communities, providing ample opportunities for members to share complementary expertise.

A watershed contains producers (farmers), possibly actors that add value to produce, traders and consumers information, and education institutions to test

their joint efforts to make a difference. Watersheds can be also a good ground for learning and demonstration of expertise.



Scope of capacity building at Project Villages

Income Generation Activities

o Stitching

o Food Processing

o Post Harvest management practices Fodder development and Management

o Gram Vatika

Crop Information

Meteorological Information

Alternative Land Use Plan

Improved and Scientific agriculture practices

Scientific planning of Soil and Moisture conservation

Information dissemination on Audio/Video

Dairy Development and Management



Table no. 44: Institutes Identified for Capacity Building

S.No

Organisation

Training Modules

1

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Junagadh Better farming practices

2

Junagadh Agricultural University soil conservation

3 SPIPA Implementation and Monitoring of watershed projects

4 IRMA Sustainable Livelihoods Governance, Natural Resource Management

5 AKRSP Participatory methods in planning and implementation of watershed projects

6 Anarde Foundation Community Based Activities,

7 BISAG, Gandhinagar GIS in planning

8 BAIF Microenterprise Planning

Early and ongoing stakeholder collaboration and communication in capacity building is also important from the point

viewpoint of “leveling the playing field” in anticipation of disputes that may arise. Filling strategic skills/capacity gaps supports

Integrated Water resources Management, facilitates dispute resolution, and builds practical understanding of the scope of sustainable

natural resource development challenges and opportunities



Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan

S. No. Village Project Stakeholders Total no. of

persons

No. of persons to be

trained

No. of training

programmes Estimated cost(lakh)

1 Dungarpur

PIA 2 2 1 0.12

WDTs 6 6 4 0.50

UGs 10 7 1 0.70

SHGs 50 40 1 1.05

WCs 10 10 1 0.50

GPs 5 5 1 0.12

Total 2.99

Table no. 45.1: Capacity Building plan


persons


trained

No. of training


1 Ivnagar

PIA 2 2 1 0.12

WDTs 6 6 4 0.50

UGs 30 21 1 0.75

SHGs 24 16 1 1.05

WCs 13 13 1 0.50

GPs 4 4 1 0.10

Total 3.02





persons


trained

No. of training


1 Khadiya

PIA 2 2 1 0.12

WDTs 6 6 4 0.80

UGs 85 65 2 3.15

SHGs 125 105 2 4.72

WCs 14 14 2 1.65

GPs 5 5 1 0.20

Total 10.64



persons


trained

No. of training


1 Palasva

PIA 2 2 1 0.12

WDTs 6 6 4 0.80

UGs 34 22 2 1.86

SHGs 85 65 2 2.85

WCs 10 10 1 0.50

GPs 5 5 1 0.20

Total 6.33





persons


trained

No. of training

programmes

Estimated

cost(lakh)

1 Patapur

PIA 2 2 1 0.12

WDTs 6 6 4 0.40

UGs 12 6 1 0.70

SHGs 55 35 1 0.92

WCs 15 15 1 0.40

GPs 4 4 1 0.10

Total 2.64



persons


trained

No. of training

programmes

Estimated

cost(lakh)

1 Vijapur

PIA 2 2 1 0.12

WDTs 6 6 4 0.50

UGs 45 20 1 1.10

SHGs 55 35 1 1.52

WCs 10 10 1 0.40

GPs 3 3 1 0.20

Total 3.84



Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure

(Rs.) Outcome

1 Street plays Local artists 1.40

Awareness generation and making

beneficiaries accountable for

sustainable development

2 Video shows IWMP-6 Junagadh 1.80

3 Wall paintings/ Focussed

Group discussion

IWMP-6 Junagadh 1.45

4 Pamphlets and posters IWMP-6 Junagadh 1.32

5 Banners and hoardings IWMP-6 Junagadh 1.28

Total: 7.25



CHAPTER - 5

BUDGETING



Budgeting

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance

Budget Component

% of the Budget

Rs in Lacs

Net Project Cost

100

589.92

-Administrative Costs

10

58.99

-Monitoring

1

5.89

-Evaluation

1

5.89

Preparatory phase:

-Entry point activities

4

23.59

-Institution and capacity building

5

29.49

-Detailed Project Report (DPR)

1

5.89

Watershed Works Phase:

-Watershed Development works,

50

294.96

-Livelihood activities for the asset less persons,

10

58.99

-Production system and micro enterprises

13

76.68

Consolidation Phase

5

29.49

Total

100

589.92



Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP

Sr.no Village Activity

EPA Institution

and CB

DPR Watershed

development

Work

Livelihood

for asset less

Production system

and

Microenterprises

Consolidation Total

1 Dungarpur 2.39 2.99 0.59 29.94 5.98 7.78 2.99 52.66

2 Ivnagar 2.42 3.02 0.60 30.26 6.05 7.86 3.02 53.23

3 Khadiya 8.51 10.64 2.12 106.47 21.29 27.68 10.64 187.35

4 Palasva 5.06 6.33 1.26 63.34 12.66 16.46 6.33 111.44

5 Patapur 2.11 2.64 0.52 26.46 5.29 6.87 2.64 46.53

6 Vijapur 3.07 3.84 0.76 38.49 7.69 10.00 3.84 67.69

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement

Sr.no Village Total cost requirement Total funds available

under IWMP

Gap in funds

requirement

1 Dungarpur 59.06 59.88 -0.82

2 Ivnagar 58.27 60.52 -2.25

3 Khadiya 221.73 212.94 8.79

4 Palasva 131.90 126.68 5.22

5 Patapur 57.23 52.92 4.31

6 Vijapur 66.50 76.99 -10.49



Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

S. No. Village Activity to be carried out

Fund made available to

IWMP due to

convergence (Rs. in lakh)

Reference no. of

activity/ task/ structure

in DPR

Level at which decision

for convergence was

taken

1 Khadiya Farm Fencing 2.79 N.R.E.G.A. Dist level

Land Leveling 6.00 N.R.E.G.A. Dist Level

Total 8.79

2 Palaswa Farm Fencing 1.72 N.R.E.G.A. Dist level

Land leveling 3.50 N.R.E.G.A. Dist level

Total 5.22

3 Patapur Farm Fencing 1.75 N.R.E.G.A. Dist level

Land Leveling 2.56 N.R.E.G.A. Dist Level

Total 4.31 N.R.E.G.A. Dist Level



CHAPTER - 6

EXPECTED OUTCOMES



6.1 Expected Outcomes

6.1.1 Employment

This programme also aims simultaneously to improve the living conditions of the abutting user communities. Employment opportunities will be

created to the people living in the watershed through different soil and water conservation activities and livelihood activities. Self employment

would be created by providing the people with cash support in the form of direct livelihood activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and

enterprise development.

Table no. 51: Employment in Project area

1 2 3 4

S.

No.

Names of

the

villages

Wage employment Self employment

No. of man days No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Wome

n

Total SC ST Other

s

Wome

n

Total

1

2

3

4

5

6

Dungarpur

Ivnagar

Khadiya

Palasava

Patapur

Vijapur

2500

1320

5650

2530

815

1460

1200

2000

1362

1160

210

365

100000

89600

216000

185000

70000

118000

48600

52600

88000

82500

42550

64800

152300

210000

311012

271190

113575

184625

160

141

510

428

212

300

59

65

73

85

90

49

960

550

1200

820

425

690

563

460

630

400

205

367

1742

1216

2413

1733

932

1406

80

95

225

180

120

168

30

42

50

40

35

48

325

410

500

455

236

385

210

180

400

245

156

195

618

727

1175

920

547

769



6.1.2 Migration

WSD can open up new opportunities for households to both intensify and extensity production, for example through:

• Increasing the frequency of cultivation – new water harvesting structures often permits cultivation of a second crop, or ‘life-saving’

irrigation of a main crop.

• Adopting new technologies, such as improved varieties of staple crops, higher levels of input use and higher yields; shifts to the cultivation

of higher value crops in the project areas expected.

• Expansion of cultivated areas – soil and water conservation interventions can bring new land into production.

All of the above tend to generate increased demands for labour. These may be provided initially from farm family sources and subsequently

by hired labour.

Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal migration from the area.



Table no. 52: Details of seasonal migration from Project area:

Sr.

No.

Name of the village No. of persons migrating No. of days per

year of migration

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project

1 Dungarpur 34 20 >150 Up to 3 month

2 Ivnagar 132 82 >150 Up to 3 month

3 Khadiya 85 42 >150 Up to 3 month

4 Palaswa 69 32 >150 Up to 3 month

5 Patapur 44 21 >150 Up to 3 month

6 Vijapur 62 25 >150 Up to 3 month



Table no. 53: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters):

6.1.3: Drinking water

Drinking water is available in all the villages through household pipeline connection which are linked through the bore well and open well with power

operated machines. WASMO has constructed a water tank to provide water facility in three villages of IWMP-6.As a result of the watershed activities, it is expected

that the quality and quantity of drinking water would improve and will be available to villagers from well constructed downstream of check dams.

Sr.

No.

Name of the

village Sources Pre-Project

level Expected Increase/Decrease

(post project)

1 Dungarpur Well

&

Bore well

12 3 mtrs increase

2 Ivnagar 09 3 mtrs increase

3 Khadiya 08 2 mtrs increase

4 Palaswa 10 3 mtrs increase

5 Patapur 10 3 mtrs increase

6 Vijapur 10 3 mtrs increase



Table no. 54: Status of Drinking water:

Village Name

Availability of drinking water

(no. of months in a year)

Quality of drinking

water Comments

Pre-Project Expected Post

Project

Pre-Project Expected

Post

Project

Dungarpur

Ivnagar

Khadiya

Palasava

Patapur

Vijapur

Drinking water

supply from

open well, bore

well, pipe

connection &

WASMO

Water available

from Check

dams and wells

above it.

Potable Potable

6.1.4: Crops:

Agriculture primarily depends upon water. The surface water is scanty due to low rainfall and lower level of which is not suitable for crop

production. All this can change with the integrated land and water management during the watershed development project. The planned farm bunds

would help in increases of groundwater level and preserve some moisture in the soil. This will help in additional are coming under cultivation and

increasing productivity too. The farmers can take more than one season of crops. Different varieties of crops can be taken.



Table no. 55: Details of crop area and yield in the project areas

Name of village

Dungarpur

Ivnagar

Khadiya

Palasava

Patapur

Vijapur

Name of crops

Kharif

Pre-project

Expected Post-project

Area (ha)

Average Yield (Qtl) per ha.

Area (ha)

Average Yield per

ha

(Qtl)

Groundnut

1555.36

20.54 2000 25.50

Rabi

Wheat

1041.23 12.99 1500 18.00

6.1.5 Horticulture

Table no. 56: Area under horticulture

S.No.

Name of Village

Existing area under horticulture (Ha)

Area under horticulture proposed to be covered through IWMP(Ha) 1

Dungarpur 0

0

2 Ivnagar 4 5

3 Khadiya 5 12

4 Palasava 4 10

5 Patapur 10 5

6 Vijapur 5 4

6.1.6 Vegetative cover

There is negligible area under tree cover. The cluster consists of only Juliflora Prosopis, Neem, Nilgiri and other forest trees. Trees like Neem and Gunda are

seen on few farm boundaries. It is planned that 25 ha land to be covered under new plantation in both villages.



Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover

S.No.

Name of Village

Existing area under tree cover (ha)

Area under tree cover proposed

1

Dungarpur 3 10

2 Ivnagar 3 4

3 Khadiya 10 29

4 Palasava 5 8

5 Patapur 2 2

6 Vijapur 6 8

6.1.7 Livestock

The village has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, and sheep. The interventions like provision of

good quality cows and buffaloes. The establishment of Dairy & Milk products in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a

substantial increase in livestock population and yield from them.

Table no. 58: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in liters, solids in kg and income in Rs.)

S.No.

Name of Village

Type of Animal

Pre-Project

Expected Post-project

Remarks

No.

Yield

Income

No.

Yield

Income

1

2

3

4

5

6

Dungarpur

Ivnagar

Khadiya

Palasava

Patapur

Vijapur

Milch-animals

Cow (per animal/day)

Cowfper animal/day)

407 6.50 150 450 9 250

Buffalo(per animal/day)

(Buffalo per animal/day)

1104 10 300 1400 14 500

Goat(Meat:Rs/kg)

Draught Purpose animals

404 450 700 500 650 1000

Sheep(Meat:Rs/kg)

Camel

0 0 0 0 0 0



6.1.8: Linkages

The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the desired results. These

linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc.

Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkages

Project

Type of Marketing Facility

Pre-project

(no.)

During the project (no.)

Post-project (no.)

Dungarpur

Ivnagar

Khadiya

Palasava

Patapur

Vijapur

Backward linkages

Seed certification

Seed supply system

1

1

Fertilizer supply system

Pesticide supply system

l_ Credit institutions

-

Bank-1

Bank-1

Water supply

SSNL

Well

Well

Extension services

KVK

KVK

Nurseries

Tools/machinery suppliers

-

Price Support system

Labour


Forward linkages

Harvesting/threshing machinery

Storage (including cold storage)

Transport facilities

Markets / Mandis

Collective marketing system

Collective marketing system Agro and other Industries

Papad processing/packaging-5

5

Milk and other collection centers

9

Milk collection centre-9

11

Labour


Vermin-compost unit-1

6



6.2 Logical Framework Analysis

Narrative Summary Indicators Source of verification Assumptions

Goal:

Sustainable Development and conservation

of natural resources with the help of Peoples

Participation

Increased Agricultural Production and

overall development

Increase in contribution of agricultural

income to the household income

Objective 1

Increase soil moisture content

1.1 Less Uncertainty in Agricultural

Production

1.2 Farmers take two

crops in a year

1.1 Discussion with

Villagers/Farmers

1.2 Soil testing

1.3 Physical verification

Repair and Maintenance and

taking care of conservation

structures

Output

Soil moisture content will increase

1.1 Clear growth of vegetation cover

1.2 Certainty in Khariff ,Rabi crop

Discussion with

Villagers/Farmers

Time to time take care of

structures

Activities

1.1 Farm bunding

1-2 Crop rotation

1-3 Mulching

1.1 550 Ha

1.2 225 Ha

1.3 315


1.2 Records in asset register

1.3 Interferences from GIS

maps at different times

1.4 Measurement Book

1.1 Money spent on right

time

1.2 Proper scientific methods

used

1-3 Workers are ready

1.4 Fields are free from crops



Objective 2

Increase irrigation potential

2.1 Increased irrigated area

2.2 Increase in Land value

2.3 More uncultivable lands to be

brought under agriculture and new

plantations

2.1 Revenue records

2.2 Patwari map

2.3 Maps from GIS

2.1 Judicious use of water

2.2 Accessibility to common

and forest lands increased

with removal of

encroachments and resolution

of conflicts.

Output

Increased irrigation water

2.1 Increased water table in wells

2.2 Increase in flow period of streams





2.4 Promotion of better

Irrigation practices like drip

irrigation

2.2 Structures full to its

capacity

2.3 Good amount of rainfall

received

Activities

2.1 Earthen dams

2.2 Percolation tank

2.3 Village ponds

2.4 Check dams

2-1 Nos.

2-2 No

2-3 No





2.1 Good amount of rainfall

2.1 Size according to

catchment and storage volume

calculation

2.3 No seepage from structure



Objective 3

To improve Soil Quality

3.1 Agriculture based livelihood income

generation activities

3.2 Promotion of organic farming

practices


3.1 Availability of

waste/mulching material

Output

Quality of Soil improved

3.1 Agriculture production will Increase

3.2 Plantation of fruits and forest

species


3.2 Market Survey

3.3 Soil testing

3.1 Composting material used

and refilled according to farm

requirement

3.2 Use it in right time

Activities

3.1 Composting

3.2 Application of Farm yard manure

3.3 Use of FYM enriched with Route

Phosphate and Bio-Fertilizers

3.1 Nos.

3.2

3.3

Physical verification

3.1 People ready for voluntary

contribution for Biogas

Structure

3.2 Available of cow dung at

right time

3.3 Proper maintenance of

structures



Objective 4

To increase fodder availability

4.1 Increase in the proportion of

households having more security of

fodder

4.2 Reduction in drudgery of fodder

collection especially women

4.1 Survey(Pre and

Post)

4.1 Quality of management of

common property resources

4.2 Proper distribution of

seedling and take care.

Out put

Increased fodder availability

4.1 Health of live stock improved

4.2 Expected increase in cattle

population

4.3 promotion of dairy development

among communities

4.1 Expenditure on

seedling from register

4.2 List of beneficiaries

from the register

4.1 Proper seedling

4.2 Proper care and

maintenance

Activities

4.1 Pasture land and grassland will be

developed.

4.2 On farm bunds selected local species

and fodder crops

4.1 Rs. Spent on fodder

4.2 Verification on farm bunds

4.1 WC's Reports

4.2 Expenditure Register

4.3 Resolution in WC's


4.1 Peoples participating

4.2 Proper variety Selection

4.3 Social fencing

Objective 5

5.1 People's participation/women's socio-

political and economic empowerment in

watershed for income generation activities

5.1 Women participation enhanced in

decision-making of GVCs.

Project to be implemented and

managed in a democratic and

participatory way ensuring

equity.



Output

5.1 Community Mobilized

5.2 Community Trained

5.3 Better standard of living

5.1 Maintenance of assets and

records by the villagers themselves.

5.1 Frequent meetings

5.2 Training register

5.3 Increased

participation

5.1 Proper training provided

5.2 No biasness in villages

Activities

5.1 Formation and strengthening of village

institutions like women's SHG

groups/WC/UGs and WCs through

awareness programmes

5.2 Formation of fodder banks to increase

fodder security and promote dung

development

5.3 Capacity building of SHG leaders and

accounts members /farmers/UGs/WCs

through workshop/meetings

5.4 Income generation activities.

5.5 Awareness campaign

5.1 Increased awareness amongst

women about village resources.

5.2 Women participation enhanced in

decision-making of GVCs.

5.3 Farmers adopt organic farming

practices

5.4 Increased household income

5.5 Improved access to credit to

livelihood purposes.

5.6 Gender sensitization of UGs and

WCs to increase inclusiveness of group

decision making.

5.1 Farmable socio-cultural

conditions at the village

5.2 Checking registers of

SHGs

5.3 Checking passbook of

groups

5.4 Physical verification of

income generation activities

5.5 Posters/banners/meeting

register

5.1 No influence of any

external agency

5.2 Smooth flow of funds

5.3 Access to appropriate

technology

5.4 People's Participation and

positive perception towards

the programme



CHAPTER - 7

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES



Quality and Sustainability Issues

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases.

The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the

entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular

project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number

wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used

for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will

help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment

etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception

stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective

measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the

project.

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias

WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in charge of the

project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The

WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then

transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment area is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the

WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent

periods of time.



7.1.1Vigilance and Monitoring Committees

1. For every work sanctioned under the Scheme, there should be a local vigilance and monitoring committee, composed of members of the locality or

village where the work is undertaken, to monitor the progress and quality of work while it is in progress. The Gram Sabha will elect the members of this

committee and ensure that SC/STs and women are represented on it.

2. The Implementing Agency should apprise this committee of estimates regarding the work, time frame and quality parameters. The final report of the

committee should be attached along with the Completion Certificate of the work, and should also be placed at the next meeting of the Gram Sabha in the

Panchayat where work has been executed.

3. Local beneficiary committees may also be constituted for effective articulation of their entitlements and their access to them. The PIA members will be

responsible for ensuring that local monitoring committees/beneficiary committees are constituted.

7.1.2 Research support in watershed management

Watershed management requires the support of research. Watershed projects will be used as on-farm sites for research designed and implemented with

significant involvement of farmers and extension workers to produce site-specific technological solutions. This leads to problems in adoption and up-

scaling of research findings within specific watersheds. There is also the question of up-scaling technologies and approaches beyond a designated

watershed. At the same time, researchers will be able to relate research activities to the real problems facing farmers or to capture the locally developed or

modified technologies. Yet there is a need to give technologies appropriate technical and scientific definition and to disseminate them widely.

7.1.3 Farmer organization and empowerment

The management of natural resources requires strong and effective farmer organizations. Such organizations empower farmers and create a good

foundation for the transfer, adoption and use of information on new technologies. They also help in negotiating for inputs at favorable prices.

Strong farmers’ organizations can be a conduct for services that meet felt needs. These needs include information to improve production and

marketing, credit, and demand driven approaches that ensure ownership and sustainability of interventions.



Farmers’ organization allows the use of participatory approaches that recognize local capacity and indigenous knowledge. It incorporates the

aspirations and perceptions that influence decision-making, while giving farmers an important role in planning and implementation of watershed

management activities. Such participation is important for the success, continuity and sustainability of the resource management programmes.

Often a successful watershed knits together many aspects of the people’s lives apart from purely technical issues. Many conservation and basic

group production initiatives have widened into a social movement dealing with matters such as weddings, funerals, care for the elderly and the

disadvantaged, and other issues in the community.

The initial natural resources focus also widens into a set of integrated activities such as the improvement of houses, provision of water and

electricity, acquisition of improved tools, seeds and livestock, all in the name of watershed management.

Empowerment of farmers therefore allows farmers to demand services and to ensure the continued role of the state in supporting watershed

development.

7.1.4 Use of traditional institutions and indigenous knowledge

Experience has shown that to effectively reach the farmers and to create viable watershed management options, it is important to respect indigenous

knowledge and combine it with the formal modern science and technology. Local traditional institutions should be part and parcel of the process. For

instance, there is a lot of under-used indigenous knowledge about climate, soils, biodiversity and other production conditions that confront farmers. A lot of

research findings are abstract to extension providers and farmers alike. Such findings need to be married with indigenous knowledge and disseminated in a

language that farmers and members of traditional institutions can understand.



7.2 Plans for Project management:

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organization and the village level

institutes. In all villages, watershed committee and various self help & user groups have been formulated for post project operation and maintenance of

assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after implementation stage. A proper

link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organization. They will act as a major kingpin during post

implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.

7.3 Watershed Development Fund:

Such contributions will promote feeling of “ownership” of the programme among stakeholders. This will contribute to sustainable outcomes in the long-

term. The voluntary contributions are saved in the Watershed Development Fund (WDF) that is to be used for repair, maintenance and use of assets created

on common land. The contribution of it will comes mainly fund the following:

Table No. 60. Details of Watershed Development Fund (WDF)

Sl. No

Financial Details

Percent Contribution

1

Natural Resource Management

For General

10%

For SC/ST

5%

2

For Intensive Agriculture, Horticulture and animal Husbandry

For General

40%

For SC/ST

20%

It is planned that for SC/ST, BPL population the contribution will be taken in form of voluntary labour and the fund for labour will be diverted to the WDF.



7.4 User Charges:

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during the

formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of watershed committee (WC) will

maintain the records of all activities.



CHAPTER – 8

MAPS

TABLE OF CONTENTS - Gujaratgswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Junagadh/Jun_IWMP_6.pdfDetailed...

Documents

Transcript of TABLE OF CONTENTS - Gujaratgswma.gujarat.gov.in/pfile/DPR/2009-10/Junagadh/Jun_IWMP_6.pdfDetailed...