T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

17
Bioenergy Transitions: the local and the global Francis X. Johnson, Senior Research Fellow Stockholm Environment Institute IFPRI Workshop on Biofuels and Food Security 19-20 November 2014

Transcript of T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

Page 1: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

Bioenergy Transitions: the local and the globalFrancis X. Johnson, Senior Research Fellow

Stockholm Environment InstituteIFPRI Workshop on Biofuels and Food Security

19-20 November 2014

Page 2: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

The role of agricultural energy sources (and agro-forestry) in LDCs – 3 somewhat convenient truths

1. The modernisation of biomass/energy utilisation is a key component in achieving climate-compatible development pathways in LDCs.

2. Agricultural energy sources (especially agricultural and agro-industrial residues) are often the “low-hanging fruit” in providing both socio-economic and environmental benefits.

3. Significant levels of Institutional development, Investment/Financing/Trade & Good Governance will be necessary to achieve such pathways.

Page 3: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

Focus on using available land and biomass more efficiently and effectively; for example, more than 50% of the available biomass

energy is lost when sugarcane is burned before harvesting

Page 4: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

Estimated land use for different HH-energy options

Source: von Maltitz, 2014

Page 5: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

Lifecycle CO2 emissions for different HH-energy options

Source: von Maltitz, 2014

Page 6: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

Country C

A

NOTE: time axis is relative to each country’s progression in use of biomass, i.e. t = 0 when biomass consumption is saturated (i.e. 95%). Dashed lines indicate start of investment in modern bioenergy

Time (relative to industrialization and biomass use)

Share of biomass

Country A

Country B

Country A (e.g. Sweden) started to expand modern bioenergy after phasing out biomass; Country B (e.g. Brazil) phased in modern bioenergy at earlier period in its development; Country C (e.g. Malawi) invests in modern bioenergy at even earlier stage in its development.

Use of biomass relative to start of industrialisation

Page 7: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

Symbiotic relations created when agro-industries use feedstock from small growers and produce decentralised energy that is available to rural communities

Agro-industrial company

Small growers

Community households

Decentralised energy (fuels, heat, power,

charging)

Page 8: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

Source: Mbow, C., Smith, P., Skole, D., Duguma, L., Bustamante, M. (2013). Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 6:8–14.

Agro-forestry options in combination with modernisation of bioenergy use can support adaptation and/or mitigation

strategies: positive or negative implications, depending on implementation

Page 9: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

Example-Mauritius: GHG emissions/tradeoffs across different scales

Page 10: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

Economic> appropriate scale> costs of gathering residues> biofuels market models

Social> organisation of small growers> Land rights> actors/networks along bioenergy supply chain

Environmental> use of degraded lands> lifecycle GHG emissions> land use change assessment

Key topics for investigation by primary sustainability dimension

Page 11: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

Agro-energy raises many interconnected issues in the African context

Mapart source:Pangea, 2013

• This complexity can lead to inaction that preserves the status quo; however, the status quo biomass utilisation is unacceptable and unsustainable

• Agro-energy development, particularly from residues, can relieve pressure on forest resources while promoting climate-compatible development

Page 12: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

International Trade in key bioenergy products: Africa has largely been bypassed thus far

**TRADE creates new investment opportunities that cannot be obtained through AID

Source: Hoffman et al, 2013

Page 13: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

Global

Regional

National

Sub-National

Local

Household

Socio-economic

Institutional-legal

Socio-technical

Techno-economic

Political-economic

Relation between different levels or scales and analytical dimensions or approaches to analysing bioenergy transitions

Page 14: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

An example of end-use demand structure: Ethanol options in Sierra Leone

• Transport - litres per year (million l): 127

• Blending at 10% (million l): 18

• Addax Bioenergy SL (million l): 85

• Surplus (million l): 67

• Household sector consumes annually:– 50 PJ of fuelwood

– 5 PJ of charcoal

• If replaced with ethanol:– Between 500 million and 1 billion litres!!

Page 15: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

• Long-term transformation of biomass from a local resource into a multi-purpose global commodity• Long-term: decades to centuries• Transformation: change in quality, carrier(s),

applications and/or end-uses• Biomass ≠ Bioenergy• Local: used mainly by owners of the resource• Multi-purpose: food, feed, fuel, fibre• Commodity: homogenous characteristics,

technical standards, trade-compatible• Concerned with transition process, in relation to

alternative energy-climate-development pathways

Global Bioenergy Transition

Page 16: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

Google Scholar Citations: “Bioenergy” or “Biofuels”

Page 17: T5 b ifpri-ws-nov2014-fx_johnson

www.sei-international.org

Thanks for your attention

[email protected]@kth.se

www.ecs.kth.se