T HE H IERARCHY OF S OMATIC M UTATIONS IN F OLLICULAR L YMPHOMA Michael R. Green, Andrew Gentles,...
-
Upload
antwan-varnell -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of T HE H IERARCHY OF S OMATIC M UTATIONS IN F OLLICULAR L YMPHOMA Michael R. Green, Andrew Gentles,...
THE HIERARCHY OF SOMATIC MUTATIONS
IN FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA
Michael R. Green, Andrew Gentles, Ramesh Nair, Jonathan Irish, Ron Levy, Ash Alizadeh.
Follicular Lymphoma (FL)
B Cells(follicular structures)
T Cells(infiltrating tumor)
LymphomaB cell receptor
Ig light chain (k)
BCL2
Tumor-infiltrating T cells (CD3)
LymphomaB cell receptor
Ig light chain (k)
3X
Follicular lymphoma histologyblack stain = T Cells (CD3)
10X
CD20
FL flow cytometry
Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Clonally rearranged immunoglobulin Characterized by t(14;18)(q32;q21) translocation Incurable using conventional therapy
◦ Good candidate for molecularly-targeted therapies Frequent mutation of MLL2 histone methyltransferase Recurrent mutation of CREBBP histone acetyltransferase
DLBCLFLMZLPTCLCLL/SLLMCLPMBL
A. Adapted from WHO 2008
B. Solal-Celigny et al. Blood 2004;104:1258
Genetic “constants”
Histone Modification by MLL2 and CREBBP
K4K27
H3H4
ING
MLL
MLL2/3INACTIVATING MUTATION
HAT
CREBBP/EP300INACTIVATING MUTATION
The Theory of “Personalized Oncology”
MacConaill and Garraway J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:5219 Roychowdhury et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 2011;3:111
The Reality of “Personalized Oncology”
Mutation 1
Mutation 2
Mutation 3
Peter C. Nowell (1976)Science.194(4260):23-8.
DRUG
Mutation 1
Mutation 2
Mutation 3
Catalogue of Mutations
RELAPSE
The Reality of “Personalized Oncology”
Mutation 1
Mutation 2
Mutation 3
DRUGMutation 1
Mutation 2
Mutation 3
Catalogue of Mutations
RELAPSE
Premise, Aim and Approach
Premise: Early genetic events are likely to be clonally dominant and represent good targets for mutation-directed therapy
Aim: To identify the hierarchy of genetic events in FL
Approach: Identify clonally dominant mutations◦ Consistently represented between intratumoral subpopulations◦ Maintained from diagnosis to relapse
Experimental approach
FACS
T-cells CD20int CD20hi
DNA Extraction
Sanger Validation
t(14;18) qPCR Tumor Purity Measurement
Whole Exome Sequencing
IgHV cloning/sequencing
Genetic “Constants”
Exome Sequencing Methodology
Constructed libraries from 3ug of DNA Captured exome with with Nimblegen SeqCap (v2) Indexed with Illumina barcodes 4-plexed samples on a single HiSeq 2000 lane (2x101bp)
Mutation Calling Called somatic nucleotide variants (SNVs) with stringent implementation GATK:◦ GATK score of ≥250 in B-cells◦ GATK score of <50 in T-cells
Filtered silent mutations and those in dbSNP/1000genomes Only considered cSNVs with:◦ ≥20X coverage in both T-cells and B-cells◦ <5% variant allele frequency (VAF) in T-cells◦ ≥5% VAF in B-cells
96% validation rate
Exome Sequencing and Mutation Detection
In 10 tumors from 8 cases, identified 877 coding SNVs in 572 unique genes◦ 95% of genes mutated in only 1/8 cases
CREBBP
MUC4MLL2
CEP112
NBPF14
AUTS2
BAZ2B
BCL2
BRWD3
C4orf49
CALR
CCAR1CTS
S
DIRAS3
ENTP
D4FA
T2 GNE
KIR2DL3
MATN2
MUC16NEB
OR2M3PEX
14
POTEG
ROS1
SLC9A6
TNFR
SF14
USP6
0.0%
25.0%
50.0%
75.0%
100.0%
Assessing sub-population skew Interrogated minor allele frequencies of 232 germ-
line coding SNPs/patient (1856 total)
Some noise around VAFs of heterozygous SNPs◦ By definition, variation in germline SNPs are
false-positives*◦ Set thresholds to obtain confident calls
At 16% VAF deviation, 85 false-positives ◦ 4.58% error
At 33% VAF deviation, 18 false-positives◦ 0.97% error
*Possibility of LOH over-estimating error
Illustrative Case of Diagnosis/Relapse Comparison
CASE 128 A 40 year old woman with enlarged lymph nodes and fevers found to have advanced follicular
lymphoma Diagnosis (1996)
◦ Histology: FL grade 1◦ Stage: 4B◦ Time to first treatment = 362 days◦ First treatment = CVP (1997) achieved Complete Remission (CR)◦ Second treatment = Id-vac (1998)
Relapse (1999)◦ Histology: FL grade 1◦ Treatment: Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide, CR
Second relapse in 2003, treated Patient alive as of Feb 2013
Conclusions The majority of mutations in FL are not recurrent and are subclonal.
MLL2 and TNFRSF14◦ Skewed distribution in tumor cell subpopulations◦ Lost between diagnosis and relapse in LP-J128
CREBBP◦ Equally represented in tumor cell subpopulations◦ Maintained between diagnosis and relapse
Subclonal=
Late event
Clonally dominant=
Early event