IB Mathematics HL Type I Coursework – PATTERNS WITHIN SYSTEMS OF LINEAR EQUATIONS
Systems Coursework
-
Upload
kamal-shayed -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Systems Coursework
-
8/22/2019 Systems Coursework
1/13
1.Question1
AnalyticalSolution:
TheLaplaceformoftheequationcanbewrittenas:
! ! !!+ 3! + 2 =
1
!
! ! =1
2!+
1
2(! + 2)
1
! + 1
! ! =1
2+1
2!!!!
!!!
SimulinkSolution:
-
8/22/2019 Systems Coursework
2/13
2.Question2
AnalyticalSolution:
!! + !!"! + !" = ! !
! ! !!!+ !!"! + ! = ! !
SubstitutingM=10,b12=0.5andk=1
! ! =!(!)
!(!)=
0.1
!! + 0.05! + 0.1
!!= 0.1 , ! = 0.05
2 0.1
!! = 1+ exp !"
1 !!= 1.779 1.8
SimulinkSolution:
-
8/22/2019 Systems Coursework
3/13
3.Question3
(a) Theplotofpart(a)isdepictedbythebluecurve.(b) Aswecanseefromthegraphabove,fora10stepinput,aswe
decreasetheparameterJ,thetransientresponseissignificantly
changed.Theovershoot,risetimeandsettlingtimedecreasesaswe
reduceJ.Wecanconcludethatasthemomentofinertiaisdecreased,
theeffectofdamping(dampingratio)increasesandhencethe
dampedfrequencywillalsodecrease,causingtheresponsetosettle
-
8/22/2019 Systems Coursework
4/13
faster.Withthatbeingsaid,thechangeinparameterJ,hasnoeffecton
thesteady-stateresponseofthesystem.
4.Question4
(a)AnalyticalSolution:
Objectiveistofindsensitivityofsystemtoparametera.
! ! =!(!)
!(!)=
2
! ! + 2
Whena=1,foraunitstepresponse:
! ! = 21
!
1
! + 1
!! = 2 2!
!!
!!!= lim
!!
! ! = 2
! 4 = 2 2!!!= 1.9633
! 4
! 100% = 98.17% > 98%
Thereforeitcanbeverifiedthatat4secondstheresponseiswithin2%ofthe
steadystateresponse.
(b)
Whena=0.5,
!(!)
!(!)=
2
! + 1.5
Weseethatthesystemwillbehaveasafirst-ordersystemsinceithas
onlyonepole.Solvingfory(t),wehave:
! ! =4
3(1 !!!.!!)
-
8/22/2019 Systems Coursework
5/13
AsshownontheplotusingSimulink,thesystembehavesasasimplefirst-
ordersystemwithatimeconstantof1.5sandamplitudeof4/3.Thiswas
expectedsincethepolesofthetransferfunctionliesontheleftsideofthe
imaginaryaxisandhencethesystemisstable.
Whenweincreasetheparameteratoa=2,!(!)
!(!)=
2
!
! ! = 2!
Weseethatthesystemisnolongerstable.Thepoleofthetransfer
functionliesontheimaginaryaxis.Thiscanbeviewedasthecriticalpoint
ofinstability,where! < 2inorderforthesystemtobestable.Fromthe
graphitcanbeseenthattheresponseincreaseslinearlywithtimeand
doesnotconvergetoasteady-statefinitevalue.
-
8/22/2019 Systems Coursework
6/13
Whenwefurtherincreaseparameteratoa=5,!(!)
!(!)=
2
! + 1.5
! ! =2
3(1+ !!!)
Weseethattheresponsetendstoinfinityexponentially,withtime.Thisis
becausethepoleofthetransferfunctionliesontherighthandsideofthe
imaginaryaxisandhencethesystemisunstable.Therefore,wecanconcludethattheparameterahastobekeptlessthan2forthesystemto
remainstable.
5.Question5
(a)Theopen-loopresponseforaunit-stepdisturbanceis,! ! =
1
5[
5
! !! + 0.9! + 5
]
! ! =!
! (11
.
02089!!!.!"!
sin 2.
190! + 1.
3682 )
-
8/22/2019 Systems Coursework
7/13
(b)Theclosedloopresponsetoaunitstepdisturbancecanbewrittenas:! ! =
1
55[
55
! !! + 0.9! + 55
]
! ! =1
55(1 1.001846!!!.!"! sin 7.4025! + 1.51 )
-
8/22/2019 Systems Coursework
8/13
(c)
Anopen-loopsystemoperateswithoutfeedbackanddirectly
generatestheoutputinresponsetoaninputsignal.Whereasaclosed-
loopsystemusesameasurementoftheoutputsignalanda
comparisonwiththedesiredoutputtogenerateanerrorsignalthatis
usedbythecontrollertoadjusttheactuator,inthiscasethe
disturbance.Hencewecanseethattheclosedloopgreatlyimproves
thedisturbancerejection,minimisingthesteadystatedisturbance
from1/5intheopen-loopto1/55intheclosedloop.
6.Question6
(a)Usingaproportionalcontroller,withGc(s)=2,wehave
!(!)
!(!)=
20
! + 3
! ! = (120
! + 3)!(!)
!!!= lim
!!
!"(!
)=
1
3,
!"#! ! = 1
!(b)UsingaPIcontroller,withGc(s)=2+20/s,wehave
-
8/22/2019 Systems Coursework
9/13
!(!)
!(!)=
20
! + 20
! ! = (120
! + 20)!(!)
!!!= lim
!!
!"(!
)= 0
,
!"#! ! = 1
!Plottingthegraphfor(a)and(b):
(c)Thesteadystatetrackingerrorwasreducedfrom1/3,whenaproportionalcontrollerwasusedto0,whenaproportionalplus
integralcontrollerwasused.HoweverthePIcontollerisfarmore
complexthanasimpleproportionalcontroller.Designingsucha
controllerwouldincurmorecost.Thereforetheengineerwouldhave
toweighthemarginalbenefitsofreducingerrorbeforeimplementing
suchcomplexcontrollers.Furthermore,ifaPIcontrollerwaschosen
incorrectly,itmayleadtoinstabiltyofthesytem.
-
8/22/2019 Systems Coursework
10/13
7.Question7(a)
(b)
Therampresponseswereplottedforbothpart(a)and(b).Fromthegraphwe
canseehowtheactualresponsedeviationfromthedesiredrampresponse.The
errorforagiventimecanbeevaluatedfromtheverticaldisplacementawayfrom
thedesiredattitude.Foraunityfeedbackloop:
! ! = !! ! !(!)
! ! = !! !!(!)
-
8/22/2019 Systems Coursework
11/13
HoweverfromSimulink,wecanplottheerroragainsttime.Thisgivesus
abetterrepresentationoftheerrorsignalofthesystem.
(a)Attitudeerrorafter10s=0.3(Usingproportionalcontroller)
(b)Thesteadystateerrorforthesystemwhenaproportionalcontrollerwasusedwas0.3,andthesteadystateerrorforthe
systemusingaPIcontrollerwaszero.Thereforeitcanbe
concludedthattheproportionalplusintegralcontrollergreatly
reducedtheerrorofthesystemresultingintheactualresponse
tobeveryclosetothedesiredresponse.
8.Question8! ! =
!(!)
!!(!)=
10!!+ 510! + 500
(! + 0.83)(!! + 11.6! + 600.44)
Usinganalyticalformulasforsecond-ordersystem,wehave:
!!= 600.44 = 24.5, ! = 11.6
2 600.44= 0.2367
!! = 1+ exp !"
1 !!= 1.465
!!=
4
!!!
= 0.69!
!! =!
!!
1 !!= 0.132!
-
8/22/2019 Systems Coursework
12/13
UsingSimulinksolution:
Fromthegraphabove,
!! = 1.25
!!= 2.55!
!! = 0.13!
Fromtheresults,itcanbeseenthat!!and!!wasclosetothepredictedresults
ofthesecond-ordersystem,andtheactual!!wasverymuchhigherthanthatofthepredicted!
!.Thiscanbeexplainedbyobservingthepolesofthetransfer
function.Thesecond-orderpoleshavearealvalueof-5.58whereasthethird
polehasarealvalueof-0.83.Sincethethirdpoleliesclosertotheimaginary
axis,itisthemoredominantpole,sowecannotassumethesystemtobe
approximatedasasecond-ordersystem.
Furthermorewecanevaluatethetimeconstantofthethirdpole,! = !!.!"
= 1.2.
Anditrequiresthat!
! 10!!
!forathird-ordersystemtobeapproximatedby
thedominantrootsofthesecond-ordersystem.Thus,whatweobserveisthat
transientresponseinitiallyfollowsasecond-ordersystem,andafter0.7s,of
whichisthesettlingtimeofthesecond-ordersystem,theresponsefollows
-
8/22/2019 Systems Coursework
13/13
closelytothatofafirst-ordersystem.Thisexplainspredictionsfor!!and!!
wereclosetotheactualresults,whereas!!wasverydifferentfromthepredicted
result.
9.Question9
Fromthegraph,
!! = 0.9784
!"#$%!"#$%,!" = 0.4995!"#$"%&'("!"#$%!!" =!! !"
!"100% = 95.87%
!"##$%&'!"#$,!!(!"#!"2%!"!") = 19.4!