Systemic risk in micro level: the case of “ cheques-as-collateral ” network
description
Transcript of Systemic risk in micro level: the case of “ cheques-as-collateral ” network
Systemic risk in micro level: the case of “cheques-as-collateral”
network
Michalis Vafopoulos, vafopoulos.org
joint work with D. Soumpekas and V. Angelis21/10/2011
Aristotle University, Mathematics Department Master in Web Science
supported by Municipality of Veria
outline① Financial crisis: a network explanation② Why networks? ③ Systemic risk and financial contagion④ The “cheques-as-collateral” network⑤ Data and model⑥ Results ⑦ Further extensions
2
Financial crisis: a network explanation
• 2007: Started from US sub-prime and disseminated rapidly to the global real economy
A reality: Regulation based on binary relations – Government & bank– Bank & customer
and a dogma: “too big to fail”
• Research on correlation and market risk (VaR-like metrics)
3
We cannot do…
Current risk systems cannot:• Predict failure cascades. • Account for linkages. • Determine counterparty losses.
4
Financial crisis: a network explanation
But the financial system (+info) is:A global networked system
So, + “too interconnected to fail”
How to model it?Networks!
5
Why networks? • Easy to model and visualize relations• Easy to calculate major statistics • The study of the Web network help us to
conclude that most of real networks are:– Self-similar (Scale-free)– Small worlds
6
NETWORK THEORY
Financial Network Analysis
Biological Network Analysis
Graph & Matrix Theory
Web Science
Social Network Analysis
Computer Science
Network theory and related fields
how? • Define:1. Node (e.g. person, business)2. Link [directed or not] (e.g. friendship, commerce)
And if necessary:3. Evaluation of node (e.g. score, potential)4. Evaluation of link (weight) (e.g. trust)
8
4 50.54
Federal fundsBech, M.L. and Atalay, E. (2008), “The Topology of the Federal Funds Market”. ECB Working Paper No. 986. Iori G, G de Masi, O Precup, G Gabbi and G Caldarelli (2008): “A
network analysis of the Italian overnight money market”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 32(1), pages 259-278
Italian money market
Financial networksFocused on banks, financial institutions etc.
Financial Systemic risk from grass-roots
What about trying model systemic risk directly from bank customers?
Financial systemic risk (definitions)• The risk of disruption to a financial entity
with spillovers to the real economy.• The risk that critical nodes of a financial
network fail disrupting linkages.• Financial contracts with externalities.
10
The “cheques-as-collateral” network
• Nodes: cheque issuers & recipients • Link ij : customer i issues cheque to customer
j• Weight of link: the fraction of the value of
cheques that customer i have issued to customer j, to the total value of cheques in euros received by the bank
Cheque recipients use their incoming cheques as collateral to working capital credit.
11
Data
The model-1(based on Martínez-Jaramillo et al., 2010). Step 01. Assume a set of criteria for the
failure of every customer (c). Here it is assumed that c=50% of the total amount of the unpaid cheques that drives every customer to failure. 2. For a given “cheques-as-collateral” network, calculate the weighted adjacency matrix (W).
The model-2Step 03. Calculate the failure threshold for every customer j:
It is assumed that this threshold remains constant in every stage k.
4. Assume a set of customers that initially fail to pay their cheques (Dk=0).
This set can be chosen by some relevant criterion. In our case, five customers with the highest weighted out-degree have been selected to collapse at stage k=0.
The model-3Step 11. Calculate the sum of the defaulted
exposures of failed customer i to j:
The model-4Step 12. Compare the calculated defaulted exposure failure threshold of customer j.
3. Update Dk with the failed customers.
The model-5Step 2• Repeat Step 1 until Dk=Dk+1.
Results-1
18
Stage 0 Number of failed nodes: 5Decrease in total value: 17%
Results-2
19
Stage 1Number of failed nodes: 4Decrease in total value: 27%
Results-3
20
Stage 2Number of failed nodes: 3Decrease in total value: 38%
Results-4
21
Stage 3Number of failed nodes: 2Decrease in total value: 41%
Results-5
22
After the shock
Number of failed nodes: 14Decrease in total value: 41%
23
Evaluating the systemic risk of a bank customer
• Assume that only a customer fails• Ceteris paribus• Calculate financial contagion• Compare to others• Weight factors like stage, sector etc• So, variety of hypothesis for the
stage-by-stage loss function
24
Evaluating the systemic risk of a bank customer
1. decreasing stage-by-stage loss2. composite loss (e.g. weight) 3. systemic risk assessment (e.g. cheque
issuer)
25
Further extensions• More data and metrics• Model the initial shock• Reverse logic: business development
“multiplier” for banks• and other sectors…
Thank you.More at www.vafopoulos.org
Questions?26
Our model is based on the idea of the Systemic Risk Network Model that accounts for bank failures in the financial system (Martínez-Jaramillo et al., 2010).
Decreasing stage-by-stage loss
29
the total adjusted loss is calculated by weighting stage 0 loss with 0.5, stage 1 loss with 0.25 and stage 2 loss with 0.125.
composite loss (e.g. weight)
30
taking into account her weight in the network.
systemic risk assessment
31