System Performance Comparisons for Dothan City Schools

73
System Performance System Performance Comparisons for Comparisons for Dothan City Schools Dothan City Schools Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama September 28, 2009

description

System Performance Comparisons for Dothan City Schools. Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama September 28, 2009. QUESTIONS What demographic challenges does the system face? Does the system focus spending to produce results? Does the system succeed with all kinds of students? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of System Performance Comparisons for Dothan City Schools

Page 1: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

System Performance System Performance Comparisons for Comparisons for

Dothan City SchoolsDothan City Schools

Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama September 28, 2009

Page 2: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

Huntsville

Hoover

Tuscaloosa City

Dothan

Decatur

Enterprise

Phenix City

Auburn

Gadsden

Opelika

Florence

Selma

Alexander City

0

1,0

00

2,0

00

3,0

00

4,0

00

5,0

00

6,0

00

7,0

00

8,0

00

9,0

00

10

,00

0

11,0

00

12

,00

0

13

,00

0

14

,00

0

15

,00

0

16

,00

0

17

,00

0

18

,00

0

19

,00

0

20

,00

0

21

,00

0

22

,00

0

23

,00

0

24

,00

0

Average Daily Membership, 2009Selected City School Systems

Page 3: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

QUESTIONSQUESTIONS

What demographic challenges does the system face?

Does the system focus spending to produce results?

Does the system succeed with all kinds of students?

Does the system prepare students for higher education and the workforce?

Page 4: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

What demographic What demographic challenges does the challenges does the

system face?system face?

Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama

Page 5: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

Selma

Gadsden

Phenix City

Tuscaloosa

Opelika

Dothan

Decatur

Florence

Alexander City

Huntsville

Enterprise

Auburn

Hoover

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Free/Reduced Lunch Percentage, 2009Selected City School Systems

Statewide

Page 6: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

Selma

Tuscaloosa

Opelika

Phenix City

Gadsden

Dothan

Huntsville

Decatur

Florence

Alexander City

Auburn

Enterprise

Hoover

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

White Black Other

Student Diversity, 2009Selected City School Systems

Page 7: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

Auburn

Hoover

Phenix City

Enterprise

Tuscaloosa

Dothan

Huntsville

Gadsden

Decatur

Alexander City

Opelika

Florence

Selma

-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

Enrollment Growth, 2000 - 2009Selected City School Systems

Page 8: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

Does the system focus Does the system focus spending to produce spending to produce

results?results?

Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama

Page 9: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

How we define spending.How we define spending.

We include all “core” academic expenditures:

• Instruction-related:

Instruction – teachers, classroom supplies, etc.

Instructional Support – principal’s office, library, instructional technology, counselor, nurse, etc.

Facilities and Administration:

Facility Operation & Maintenance – custodial & maintenance services, utilities, security, etc.

Administration – board, central office, etc.

We exclude Food Service and Transportation

Page 10: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

Central Administration

4% Facility O & M

11%

Instructional Support19%

Instruction

66%

Typical System at $8,098 Core Spending Level(85 / 15)

Page 11: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

Central Administration

4% Facility O & M

10%

Instructional Support19%

Instruction

67%

Dothan at $8,051 Core Spending Level(86 / 14)

Page 12: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

Hoover

Florence

Huntsville

Auburn

Decatur

Opelika

Tuscaloosa

Gadsden

Alexander City

Dothan

Phenix City

Selma

Enterprise

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000

Core Expenditures Per Student, 2008

3

7

12

13

16

18

28

32

53

80

81

93

Rank

39

Statewide

Page 13: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

Hoover

Florence

Auburn

Huntsville

Decatur

Opelika

Gadsden

Tuscaloosa

Alexander City

Dothan

Enterprise

Selma

Phenix City

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000

Instruction-Related Expenditures Per Student, 2008

3

7

10

13

15

16

21

24

44

75

96

105

Rank

29

Instruction Inst. Spt.Statewide

Page 14: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

Alexander City

Gadsden

Auburn

Dothan

Opelika

Decatur

Florence

Hoover

Enterprise

Huntsville

Tuscaloosa

Selma

Phenix City

40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Instruction-Related Expenditure Percentage, 2008

37

53

57

59

60

64

72

80

104

111

114

117

Rank

85

Instruction Inst. Spt. Statewide

Page 15: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

Hoover

Huntsville

Phenix City

Florence

Selma

Decatur

Tuscaloosa

Opelika

Auburn

Gadsden

Dothan

Alexander City

Enterprise

$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000

Facility & Administration Expenditures Per Student, 2008

11

13

20

24

29

32

33

43

53

62

69

71

Rank

49

Facility O & M AdministrationStatewide

Page 16: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

Phenix City

Selma

Tuscaloosa

Huntsville

Enterprise

Hoover

Florence

Decatur

Opelika

Dothan

Auburn

Gadsden

Alexander City

0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

Facility & Administration Expenditure Percentage, 2008

15

18

21

28

47

52

60

68

73

75

79

95

Rank

72

Facility O & M AdministrationStatewide

Page 17: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

Does the system succeed Does the system succeed with all kinds of students?with all kinds of students?

Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama

Page 18: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

How we measure success.How we measure success.

Performance on the Alabama Reading and Math Test (ARMT) in Grades 3-8 and the Alabama High School Graduation Exam (AHSGE) in Grades 11-12

Measured by % of students performing at Level IVLevel I – does not meet academic standardsLevel II – partially meets academic standardsLevel III – meets academic standardsLevel IV – exceeds academic standards

Compared with the statewide average For key socioeconomic subgroups in the student body

Poverty vs. Non-Poverty students (defined by free/reduced lunch percentage)

White vs. Black students

Page 19: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

-90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Percent of Students Scoring at the Level Indicated

NAEP vs. ARMT ScoringAlabama 4th Grade Results for 2007

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

Level I Level II Level III Level IV

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

Level I Level III Level IVLevel II

MATH

READING

NAEP

NAEP

ARMT

ARMT

Page 20: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

White

Black

Non-Pov.

Pov.

Statewide W - B Gap

Statewide NP - P Gap

PERCENT OF STUDENTS SCORING AT LEVEL IV

+ 10 or More Points

ST AVG

+ 1-9 Points

- 1-9 Points

- 10 or More Points

Page 21: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

Summary of Test Results forSummary of Test Results for 13 School Systems, Spring 200913 School Systems, Spring 2009

• Percent of 2009 results above statewide Percent of 2009 results above statewide averages for the four subgroupsaverages for the four subgroups

• Comparison of 2008 and 2009 results Comparison of 2008 and 2009 results (Percent of “green” results)(Percent of “green” results)

• Percent of 2009 results showing Percent of 2009 results showing improvement over 2008improvement over 2008

Page 22: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools
Page 23: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools
Page 24: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools
Page 25: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools
Page 26: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools
Page 27: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools
Page 28: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools
Page 29: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools
Page 30: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools
Page 31: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 63.0 68.2 59.7 3 M 35.6 43.8 35.3 24.5 24.4 4 M 60.5 75.3 59.9 4 M 35.5 28.4 35.2 46.9 24.7 5 M 63.4 62.6 53.7 5 M 35.3 36.5 30.3 26.0 23.4 6 M 57.0 44.6 38.4 6 M 41.8 17.7 15.3 27.0 23.1 7 M 62.5 48.5 34.1 7 M 34.5 33.0 14.7 15.5 19.3 8 M 53.4 45.3 34.6 8 M 45.1 12.8 12.6 32.5 22.0 3 R 63.2 70.6 63.1 3 R 35.7 52.1 35.9 18.5 27.1 4 R 60.5 72.0 64.9 4 R 35.5 31.8 35.1 40.2 29.8 5 R 63.4 62.6 62.5 5 R 35.3 35.6 35.1 27.0 27.3 6 R 57.1 73.6 69.0 6 R 41.6 37.3 43.0 36.3 26.1 7 R 62.6 68.7 57.0 7 R 34.3 36.3 29.1 32.4 27.9 8 R 53.3 53.7 47.4 8 R 45.3 16.0 18.4 37.7 29.1

White Students (W)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

ALEXANDER CITY

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Black Students (B)

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 45.9 68.6 65.5 3 M 54.1 50.7 39.7 17.9 25.8 4 M 44.8 82.0 66.1 4 M 55.2 38.0 39.3 44.0 26.8 5 M 43.1 75.6 60.6 5 M 57.0 36.9 33.2 38.7 27.4 6 M 42.6 54.8 44.5 6 M 57.4 17.1 18.2 37.7 26.3 7 M 49.6 58.8 40.6 7 M 50.4 27.8 15.9 31.0 24.8 8 M 42.6 52.5 40.1 8 M 57.4 13.8 14.3 38.7 25.8 3 R 46.1 71.0 69.8 3 R 53.9 57.2 40.0 13.7 29.8 4 R 44.8 81.1 71.6 4 R 55.2 35.8 40.0 45.3 31.6 5 R 43.1 72.4 69.7 5 R 57.0 37.5 38.6 34.9 31.1 6 R 42.9 83.8 76.2 6 R 57.1 40.0 45.4 43.8 30.8 7 R 49.8 75.8 63.7 7 R 50.2 38.4 32.1 37.4 31.6 8 R 42.8 61.0 52.9 8 R 57.3 17.7 22.1 43.3 30.9

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Poverty Students (P)

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

Non-Poverty Students (NP)

System

Page 32: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 61.1 33.1 26.1 11 M 35.2 12.6 9.1 20.5 17.0

12 M 58.4 13.5 26.8 12 M 39.5 6.7 10.2 6.8 16.6

11 R 61.1 15.9 16.9 11 R 35.2 2.3 4.6 13.6 12.3

12 R 58.4 25.2 25.3 12 R 39.5 6.7 7.2 18.6 18.1

11 S 54.8 58.8 32.8 11 S 41.9 - 7.3 58.8 25.5

12 S 58.4 30.6 30.9 12 S 39.5 6.7 8.7 24.0 22.2

ALEXANDER CITY

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

White Students (W) Black Students (B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 62.4 31.2 27.6 11 M 37.7 17.2 10.5 14.0 17.1

12 M 66.8 13.4 27.1 12 M 33.2 4.8 11.7 8.6 15.4

11 R 62.4 15.6 17.6 11 R 37.7 4.3 5.5 11.3 12.1

12 R 66.8 22.8 25.0 12 R 33.2 6.4 8.9 16.5 16.0

11 S 61.3 52.6 33.1 11 S 38.7 - 11.0 52.6 22.2

12 S 66.8 26.8 30.2 12 S 33.2 7.9 11.4 18.8 18.8

Gap Between Groups (NP - P)

Non-Poverty Students (NP) Poverty Students (P)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Page 33: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 67.4 76.9 59.7 3 M 23.6 27.7 35.3 49.2 24.4 4 M 66.1 79.3 59.9 4 M 24.0 27.3 35.2 52.0 24.7 5 M 64.3 81.5 53.7 5 M 24.7 41.2 30.3 40.3 23.4 6 M 63.4 50.9 38.4 6 M 28.8 13.5 15.3 37.3 23.1 7 M 60.4 61.9 34.1 7 M 28.0 19.5 14.7 42.4 19.3 8 M 59.1 63.4 34.6 8 M 28.6 20.3 12.6 43.1 22.0 3 R 67.4 83.1 63.1 3 R 23.6 43.8 35.9 39.4 27.1 4 R 66.1 83.8 64.9 4 R 24.0 31.4 35.1 52.4 29.8 5 R 64.3 83.5 62.5 5 R 24.7 47.4 35.1 36.1 27.3 6 R 63.3 90.4 69.0 6 R 28.9 50.0 43.0 40.4 26.1 7 R 60.5 80.4 57.0 7 R 28.1 34.2 29.1 46.2 27.9 8 R 59.0 69.0 47.4 8 R 28.7 24.2 18.4 44.8 29.1

White Students (W)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

AUBURN

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Black Students (B)

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 72.0 78.4 65.5 3 M 28.0 27.1 39.7 51.3 25.8 4 M 73.6 78.2 66.1 4 M 26.4 33.1 39.3 45.1 26.8 5 M 73.6 80.9 60.6 5 M 26.4 45.1 33.2 35.8 27.4 6 M 72.1 50.2 44.5 6 M 27.9 15.5 18.2 34.7 26.3 7 M 72.9 61.9 40.6 7 M 27.1 21.9 15.9 40.0 24.8 8 M 73.7 62.5 40.1 8 M 26.3 23.9 14.3 38.6 25.8 3 R 72.0 82.8 69.8 3 R 28.0 45.1 40.0 37.6 29.8 4 R 73.6 80.6 71.6 4 R 26.4 39.1 40.0 41.5 31.6 5 R 73.6 80.3 69.7 5 R 26.4 50.8 38.6 29.5 31.1 6 R 71.9 86.2 76.2 6 R 28.1 52.3 45.4 33.9 30.8 7 R 72.8 76.8 63.7 7 R 27.2 37.0 32.1 39.8 31.6 8 R 73.6 65.7 52.9 8 R 26.4 27.2 22.1 38.5 30.9

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Poverty Students (P)

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

Non-Poverty Students (NP)

System

Page 34: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 63.6 42.4 26.1 11 M 27.5 11.1 9.1 31.3 17.0

12 M 61.1 46.4 26.8 12 M 31.2 12.4 10.2 34.0 16.6

11 R 63.7 37.4 16.9 11 R 27.4 5.1 4.6 32.3 12.3

12 R 61.1 42.2 25.3 12 R 31.2 14.1 7.2 28.1 18.1

11 S 65.0 48.4 32.8 11 S 27.5 13.2 7.3 35.2 25.5

12 S 61.1 47.3 30.9 12 S 31.2 6.6 8.7 40.7 22.2

AUBURN

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

White Students (W) Black Students (B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 76.7 43.1 27.6 11 M 23.3 10.7 10.5 32.4 17.1

12 M 78.4 44.7 27.1 12 M 21.7 14.3 11.7 30.5 15.4

11 R 76.7 33.6 17.6 11 R 23.3 4.8 5.5 28.8 12.1

12 R 78.4 39.5 25.0 12 R 21.7 11.9 8.9 27.6 16.0

11 S 78.0 46.1 33.1 11 S 22.1 11.0 11.0 35.2 22.2

12 S 78.4 41.8 30.2 12 S 21.7 10.7 11.4 31.1 18.8

Gap Between Groups (NP - P)

Non-Poverty Students (NP) Poverty Students (P)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Page 35: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 46.2 70.9 59.7 3 M 34.1 29.4 35.3 41.5 24.4 4 M 47.8 67.7 59.9 4 M 34.0 28.5 35.2 39.2 24.7 5 M 49.5 60.9 53.7 5 M 31.8 23.3 30.3 37.6 23.4 6 M 50.5 50.2 38.4 6 M 32.7 11.4 15.3 38.7 23.1 7 M 50.0 55.6 34.1 7 M 33.7 18.9 14.7 36.7 19.3 8 M 48.2 52.4 34.6 8 M 36.7 12.6 12.6 39.8 22.0 3 R 46.1 74.8 63.1 3 R 34.2 31.7 35.9 43.1 27.1 4 R 48.1 69.2 64.9 4 R 34.1 30.4 35.1 38.8 29.8 5 R 49.5 64.8 62.5 5 R 31.9 32.9 35.1 32.0 27.3 6 R 50.5 74.5 69.0 6 R 32.7 42.9 43.0 31.6 26.1 7 R 50.0 65.4 57.0 7 R 33.7 26.4 29.1 39.0 27.9 8 R 48.3 54.8 47.4 8 R 36.6 18.5 18.4 36.3 29.1

White Students (W)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

DECATUR

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Black Students (B)

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 38.6 73.7 65.5 3 M 61.4 38.9 39.7 34.7 25.8 4 M 42.4 71.7 66.1 4 M 57.6 35.3 39.3 36.4 26.8 5 M 44.4 61.7 60.6 5 M 55.6 29.7 33.2 32.0 27.4 6 M 40.9 54.4 44.5 6 M 59.1 16.3 18.2 38.1 26.3 7 M 46.0 62.1 40.6 7 M 54.0 18.8 15.9 43.3 24.8 8 M 44.2 57.8 40.1 8 M 55.8 11.9 14.3 46.0 25.8 3 R 38.6 78.5 69.8 3 R 61.4 36.3 40.0 42.1 29.8 4 R 42.7 71.8 71.6 4 R 57.3 35.1 40.0 36.7 31.6 5 R 44.1 67.1 69.7 5 R 55.9 34.5 38.6 32.6 31.1 6 R 40.9 81.8 76.2 6 R 59.1 42.9 45.4 38.9 30.8 7 R 45.9 68.5 63.7 7 R 54.1 29.3 32.1 39.2 31.6 8 R 44.3 59.4 52.9 8 R 55.7 19.3 22.1 40.0 30.9

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Poverty Students (P)

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

Non-Poverty Students (NP)

System

Page 36: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 54.1 33.7 26.1 11 M 34.4 10.5 9.1 23.2 17.0

12 M 60.9 37.5 26.8 12 M 28.2 5.8 10.2 31.7 16.6

11 R 54.1 19.1 16.9 11 R 34.4 5.3 4.6 13.8 12.3

12 R 60.9 31.2 25.3 12 R 28.2 7.8 7.2 23.4 18.1

11 S 55.2 45.6 32.8 11 S 33.3 7.3 7.3 38.3 25.5

12 S 60.9 35.7 30.9 12 S 28.2 5.8 8.7 29.9 22.2

DECATUR

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

White Students (W) Black Students (B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 58.0 32.6 27.6 11 M 42.0 9.9 10.5 22.7 17.1

12 M 70.0 34.5 27.1 12 M 30.0 9.8 11.7 24.7 15.4

11 R 58.2 18.9 17.6 11 R 41.8 3.5 5.5 15.5 12.1

12 R 70.0 28.5 25.0 12 R 30.0 6.7 8.9 21.8 16.0

11 S 59.4 40.6 33.1 11 S 40.6 11.0 11.0 29.6 22.2

12 S 70.0 32.4 30.2 12 S 30.0 5.5 11.4 26.9 18.8

Gap Between Groups (NP - P)

Non-Poverty Students (NP) Poverty Students (P)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Page 37: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 39.4 70.2 59.7 3 M 54.7 42.2 35.3 28.0 24.4 4 M 41.2 71.2 59.9 4 M 54.5 38.3 35.2 32.9 24.7 5 M 39.4 62.3 53.7 5 M 57.8 27.5 30.3 34.8 23.4 6 M 42.3 35.9 38.4 6 M 53.1 11.0 15.3 24.9 23.1 7 M 40.2 28.0 34.1 7 M 55.3 11.0 14.7 17.0 19.3 8 M 39.9 33.0 34.6 8 M 55.6 9.3 12.6 23.6 22.0 3 R 39.5 67.5 63.1 3 R 54.6 42.3 35.9 25.1 27.1 4 R 41.3 75.8 64.9 4 R 54.5 36.7 35.1 39.1 29.8 5 R 39.4 72.9 62.5 5 R 57.6 38.7 35.1 34.2 27.3 6 R 42.7 75.3 69.0 6 R 52.7 50.0 43.0 25.3 26.1 7 R 40.2 72.1 57.0 7 R 55.3 36.1 29.1 36.0 27.9 8 R 39.8 60.0 47.4 8 R 55.6 22.9 18.4 37.1 29.1

White Students (W)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

DOTHAN

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Black Students (B)

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 35.5 72.6 65.5 3 M 64.5 45.4 39.7 27.2 25.8 4 M 35.7 71.2 66.1 4 M 64.3 43.1 39.3 28.1 26.8 5 M 35.0 62.6 60.6 5 M 65.0 31.0 33.2 31.6 27.4 6 M 43.9 33.2 44.5 6 M 56.1 13.1 18.2 20.1 26.3 7 M 39.7 27.2 40.6 7 M 60.3 13.2 15.9 14.0 24.8 8 M 39.4 31.8 40.1 8 M 60.6 12.1 14.3 19.7 25.8 3 R 35.5 74.5 69.8 3 R 64.5 43.0 40.0 31.5 29.8 4 R 35.8 78.7 71.6 4 R 64.2 40.6 40.0 38.2 31.6 5 R 35.0 75.7 69.7 5 R 65.0 40.9 38.6 34.9 31.1 6 R 44.1 75.4 76.2 6 R 55.9 51.0 45.4 24.4 30.8 7 R 39.7 71.8 63.7 7 R 60.3 39.5 32.1 32.2 31.6 8 R 39.4 58.0 52.9 8 R 60.6 26.3 22.1 31.7 30.9

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Poverty Students (P)

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

Non-Poverty Students (NP)

System

Page 38: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 45.7 20.0 26.1 11 M 50.4 10.4 9.1 9.6 17.0

12 M 46.1 15.8 26.8 12 M 51.1 7.1 10.2 8.7 16.6

11 R 45.6 18.3 16.9 11 R 50.5 4.2 4.6 14.1 12.3

12 R 46.2 24.6 25.3 12 R 51.0 6.8 7.2 17.8 18.1

11 S 55.1 50.0 32.8 11 S 37.7 11.5 7.3 38.5 25.5

12 S 46.1 28.3 30.9 12 S 51.1 6.4 8.7 21.9 22.2

DOTHAN

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

White Students (W) Black Students (B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 56.8 20.9 27.6 11 M 43.2 9.0 10.5 11.9 17.1

12 M 63.0 14.0 27.1 12 M 37.0 7.8 11.7 6.3 15.4

11 R 56.7 17.8 17.6 11 R 43.3 2.2 5.5 15.6 12.1

12 R 63.1 20.4 25.0 12 R 36.9 6.8 8.9 13.7 16.0

11 S 65.2 46.7 33.1 11 S 34.8 12.5 11.0 34.2 22.2

12 S 63.0 23.2 30.2 12 S 37.0 7.8 11.4 15.4 18.8

Gap Between Groups (NP - P)

Non-Poverty Students (NP) Poverty Students (P)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Page 39: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 68.1 59.4 59.7 3 M 20.4 31.5 35.3 27.9 24.4 4 M 63.0 71.2 59.9 4 M 26.5 38.9 35.2 32.2 24.7 5 M 67.7 62.7 53.7 5 M 22.2 34.6 30.3 28.1 23.4 6 M 66.1 55.7 38.4 6 M 22.7 20.2 15.3 35.5 23.1 7 M 63.5 39.3 34.1 7 M 25.2 14.1 14.7 25.3 19.3 8 M 63.6 43.1 34.6 8 M 25.9 14.7 12.6 28.4 22.0 3 R 68.2 69.3 63.1 3 R 20.3 46.7 35.9 22.5 27.1 4 R 63.1 78.9 64.9 4 R 26.4 42.8 35.1 36.2 29.8 5 R 67.9 77.4 62.5 5 R 22.2 43.0 35.1 34.5 27.3 6 R 66.1 79.3 69.0 6 R 22.7 53.2 43.0 26.0 26.1 7 R 63.7 63.7 57.0 7 R 25.1 32.8 29.1 30.9 27.9 8 R 63.8 63.4 47.4 8 R 25.8 26.5 18.4 36.9 29.1

White Students (W)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

ENTERPRISE

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Black Students (B)

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 57.7 59.8 65.5 3 M 42.3 44.0 39.7 15.8 25.8 4 M 59.6 73.9 66.1 4 M 40.4 47.0 39.3 26.9 26.8 5 M 58.4 65.6 60.6 5 M 41.6 41.8 33.2 23.8 27.4 6 M 62.0 60.1 44.5 6 M 38.1 25.1 18.2 34.9 26.3 7 M 61.3 43.6 40.6 7 M 38.7 12.7 15.9 30.9 24.8 8 M 64.6 41.3 40.1 8 M 35.4 24.2 14.3 17.1 25.8 3 R 57.6 71.7 69.8 3 R 42.4 53.1 40.0 18.5 29.8 4 R 59.5 79.3 71.6 4 R 40.5 53.2 40.0 26.1 31.6 5 R 58.6 78.1 69.7 5 R 41.4 50.5 38.6 27.6 31.1 6 R 62.0 83.2 76.2 6 R 38.1 53.6 45.4 29.7 30.8 7 R 61.6 67.2 63.7 7 R 38.4 33.7 32.1 33.5 31.6 8 R 64.5 62.1 52.9 8 R 35.5 35.8 22.1 26.2 30.9

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Poverty Students (P)

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

Non-Poverty Students (NP)

System

Page 40: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 65.2 33.2 26.1 11 M 24.0 12.5 9.1 20.7 17.0

12 M 68.5 32.6 26.8 12 M 21.4 14.6 10.2 18.0 16.6

11 R 65.4 24.7 16.9 11 R 24.1 8.0 4.6 16.6 12.3

12 R 68.5 36.8 25.3 12 R 21.4 16.9 7.2 20.0 18.1

11 S 53.1 29.4 32.8 11 S 34.4 9.1 7.3 20.3 25.5

12 S 68.5 51.9 30.9 12 S 21.4 23.6 8.7 28.3 22.2

ENTERPRISE

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

White Students (W) Black Students (B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 74.0 31.6 27.6 11 M 26.0 16.5 10.5 15.1 17.1

12 M 78.4 34.4 27.1 12 M 21.6 13.3 11.7 21.0 15.4

11 R 74.0 23.8 17.6 11 R 26.0 9.1 5.5 14.8 12.1

12 R 78.4 37.1 25.0 12 R 21.6 13.3 8.9 23.8 16.0

11 S 65.6 33.3 33.1 11 S 34.4 - 11.0 33.3 22.2

12 S 78.4 52.5 30.2 12 S 21.6 21.1 11.4 31.3 18.8

Gap Between Groups (NP - P)

Non-Poverty Students (NP) Poverty Students (P)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Page 41: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 50.8 51.2 59.7 3 M 40.1 35.2 35.3 16.1 24.4 4 M 54.8 61.6 59.9 4 M 39.2 38.2 35.2 23.4 24.7 5 M 52.8 55.3 53.7 5 M 41.6 32.4 30.3 22.9 23.4 6 M 48.7 36.7 38.4 6 M 44.5 18.0 15.3 18.8 23.1 7 M 62.9 37.4 34.1 7 M 31.1 15.9 14.7 21.5 19.3 8 M 58.3 59.5 34.6 8 M 35.0 37.5 12.6 22.0 22.0 3 R 50.9 54.9 63.1 3 R 39.9 30.7 35.9 24.2 27.1 4 R 54.8 66.9 64.9 4 R 39.2 47.2 35.1 19.7 29.8 5 R 52.8 69.5 62.5 5 R 41.6 24.3 35.1 45.2 27.3 6 R 48.9 69.5 69.0 6 R 44.7 48.7 43.0 20.8 26.1 7 R 62.6 66.9 57.0 7 R 31.3 33.7 29.1 33.1 27.9 8 R 58.1 61.3 47.4 8 R 35.2 29.5 18.4 31.8 29.1

White Students (W)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

FLORENCE

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Black Students (B)

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 30.7 53.1 65.5 3 M 69.3 40.3 39.7 12.8 25.8 4 M 36.6 70.4 66.1 4 M 63.4 41.2 39.3 29.2 26.8 5 M 39.3 64.8 60.6 5 M 60.7 32.1 33.2 32.7 27.4 6 M 33.5 48.9 44.5 6 M 66.5 17.7 18.2 31.2 26.3 7 M 45.1 49.6 40.6 7 M 54.9 12.4 15.9 37.2 24.8 8 M 47.8 68.3 40.1 8 M 52.2 34.2 14.3 34.1 25.8 3 R 30.5 70.1 69.8 3 R 69.5 32.6 40.0 37.5 29.8 4 R 36.6 79.1 71.6 4 R 63.4 48.2 40.0 30.9 31.6 5 R 39.3 74.3 69.7 5 R 60.7 32.1 38.6 42.2 31.1 6 R 33.6 84.1 76.2 6 R 66.4 48.3 45.4 35.8 30.8 7 R 44.9 74.0 63.7 7 R 55.1 37.0 32.1 37.0 31.6 8 R 47.7 69.7 52.9 8 R 52.4 29.5 22.1 40.2 30.9

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Poverty Students (P)

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

Non-Poverty Students (NP)

System

Page 42: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 63.7 37.2 26.1 11 M 30.2 19.1 9.1 18.1 17.0

12 M 65.7 33.7 26.8 12 M 29.6 8.1 10.2 25.6 16.6

11 R 63.6 24.6 16.9 11 R 30.3 2.3 4.6 22.4 12.3

12 R 65.7 31.1 25.3 12 R 29.6 8.1 7.2 23.0 18.1

11 S 63.2 55.2 32.8 11 S 30.2 11.5 7.3 43.7 25.5

12 S 65.7 33.7 30.9 12 S 29.6 6.9 8.7 26.8 22.2

FLORENCE

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

White Students (W) Black Students (B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 64.4 40.5 27.6 11 M 35.6 15.2 10.5 25.3 17.1

12 M 61.6 34.8 27.1 12 M 38.4 10.6 11.7 24.2 15.4

11 R 64.3 24.9 17.6 11 R 35.7 4.8 5.5 20.1 12.1

12 R 61.6 29.8 25.0 12 R 38.4 11.5 8.9 18.3 16.0

11 S 64.3 51.2 33.1 11 S 35.7 21.7 11.0 29.5 22.2

12 S 61.6 36.5 30.2 12 S 38.4 8.0 11.4 28.5 18.8

Gap Between Groups (NP - P)

Non-Poverty Students (NP) Poverty Students (P)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Page 43: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 44.6 61.7 59.7 3 M 48.9 32.1 35.3 29.6 24.4 4 M 45.2 58.3 59.9 4 M 46.6 25.9 35.2 32.4 24.7 5 M 40.2 49.4 53.7 5 M 51.8 29.9 30.3 19.5 23.4 6 M 38.5 30.2 38.4 6 M 54.3 9.5 15.3 20.7 23.1 7 M 33.4 29.6 34.1 7 M 59.8 13.6 14.7 16.0 19.3 8 M 30.8 38.7 34.6 8 M 60.3 9.9 12.6 28.8 22.0 3 R 44.8 63.8 63.1 3 R 48.6 36.2 35.9 27.6 27.1 4 R 45.3 65.2 64.9 4 R 46.7 32.1 35.1 33.1 29.8 5 R 40.5 60.2 62.5 5 R 52.0 30.1 35.1 30.2 27.3 6 R 38.6 60.0 69.0 6 R 54.5 34.9 43.0 25.1 26.1 7 R 33.6 54.9 57.0 7 R 59.6 22.5 29.1 32.4 27.9 8 R 30.9 44.4 47.4 8 R 60.6 16.9 18.4 27.5 29.1

White Students (W)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

GADSDEN

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Black Students (B)

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 25.9 72.8 65.5 3 M 74.1 37.4 39.7 35.4 25.8 4 M 23.9 65.7 66.1 4 M 76.1 33.3 39.3 32.3 26.8 5 M 28.8 63.0 60.6 5 M 71.2 28.9 33.2 34.1 27.4 6 M 24.8 47.9 44.5 6 M 75.2 7.9 18.2 40.0 26.3 7 M 25.8 40.2 40.6 7 M 74.2 11.6 15.9 28.6 24.8 8 M 24.1 48.5 40.1 8 M 75.9 10.1 14.3 38.3 25.8 3 R 26.0 76.3 69.8 3 R 74.0 38.9 40.0 37.4 29.8 4 R 24.0 73.7 71.6 4 R 76.0 37.6 40.0 36.2 31.6 5 R 29.0 71.4 69.7 5 R 71.0 30.9 38.6 40.5 31.1 6 R 24.7 72.9 76.2 6 R 75.3 35.5 45.4 37.4 30.8 7 R 26.0 69.9 63.7 7 R 74.0 21.2 32.1 48.7 31.6 8 R 24.2 50.5 52.9 8 R 75.8 18.4 22.1 32.1 30.9

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Poverty Students (P)

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

Non-Poverty Students (NP)

System

Page 44: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 39.3 33.9 26.1 11 M 55.3 6.0 9.1 27.9 17.0

12 M 34.4 23.5 26.8 12 M 59.6 6.0 10.2 17.5 16.6

11 R 39.1 17.1 16.9 11 R 55.5 3.6 4.6 13.5 12.3

12 R 34.4 30.4 25.3 12 R 59.6 5.0 7.2 25.4 18.1

11 S 40.1 40.4 32.8 11 S 55.1 3.7 7.3 36.7 25.5

12 S 34.4 28.7 30.9 12 S 59.6 3.0 8.7 25.7 22.2

GADSDEN

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

White Students (W) Black Students (B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 42.0 31.0 27.6 11 M 58.0 8.1 10.5 22.9 17.1

12 M 45.5 23.0 27.1 12 M 54.5 5.0 11.7 18.1 15.4

11 R 42.1 18.3 17.6 11 R 57.9 2.9 5.5 15.4 12.1

12 R 45.5 23.7 25.0 12 R 54.5 7.1 8.9 16.5 16.0

11 S 42.5 35.2 33.1 11 S 57.5 7.0 11.0 28.2 22.2

12 S 45.5 21.7 30.2 12 S 54.5 5.0 11.4 16.8 18.8

Gap Between Groups (NP - P)

Non-Poverty Students (NP) Poverty Students (P)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Page 45: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 64.7 67.1 59.7 3 M 21.7 32.4 35.3 34.8 24.4 4 M 66.4 70.8 59.9 4 M 20.0 39.2 35.2 31.6 24.7 5 M 68.9 68.8 53.7 5 M 20.3 36.8 30.3 32.0 23.4 6 M 65.0 61.7 38.4 6 M 22.7 30.5 15.3 31.2 23.1 7 M 68.3 53.2 34.1 7 M 20.0 16.8 14.7 36.4 19.3 8 M 68.5 57.7 34.6 8 M 21.8 22.1 12.6 35.6 22.0 3 R 65.0 72.1 63.1 3 R 21.8 35.1 35.9 37.1 27.1 4 R 66.7 79.1 64.9 4 R 20.0 46.4 35.1 32.7 29.8 5 R 68.9 74.8 62.5 5 R 20.2 42.6 35.1 32.2 27.3 6 R 65.0 84.2 69.0 6 R 22.9 58.4 43.0 25.8 26.1 7 R 68.8 77.2 57.0 7 R 19.9 46.8 29.1 30.4 27.9 8 R 68.8 72.8 47.4 8 R 21.7 33.5 18.4 39.3 29.1

White Students (W)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

HOOVER

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Black Students (B)

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 80.0 64.3 65.5 3 M 20.0 28.9 39.7 35.3 25.8 4 M 80.5 67.7 66.1 4 M 19.5 33.9 39.3 33.9 26.8 5 M 83.7 67.1 60.6 5 M 16.4 31.4 33.2 35.7 27.4 6 M 83.5 59.1 44.5 6 M 16.5 28.4 18.2 30.7 26.3 7 M 84.6 50.7 40.6 7 M 15.4 15.0 15.9 35.7 24.8 8 M 85.0 53.1 40.1 8 M 15.0 21.8 14.3 31.4 25.8 3 R 80.1 68.7 69.8 3 R 19.9 35.4 40.0 33.4 29.8 4 R 80.6 76.2 71.6 4 R 19.4 34.6 40.0 41.6 31.6 5 R 83.5 71.9 69.7 5 R 16.5 32.9 38.6 39.0 31.1 6 R 83.6 80.6 76.2 6 R 16.5 60.5 45.4 20.1 30.8 7 R 85.0 73.7 63.7 7 R 15.0 43.7 32.1 30.0 31.6 8 R 85.2 67.4 52.9 8 R 14.8 32.4 22.1 35.0 30.9

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Poverty Students (P)

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

Non-Poverty Students (NP)

System

Page 46: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 69.9 40.0 26.1 11 M 19.1 9.8 9.1 30.1 17.0

12 M 74.7 44.3 26.8 12 M 17.2 23.4 10.2 20.9 16.6

11 R 69.8 26.3 16.9 11 R 19.1 8.2 4.6 18.1 12.3

12 R 74.8 40.0 25.3 12 R 17.2 16.8 7.2 23.2 18.1

11 S 75.3 58.7 32.8 11 S 13.2 17.7 7.3 41.0 25.5

12 S 74.7 47.1 30.9 12 S 17.2 20.4 8.7 26.7 22.2

HOOVER

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

White Students (W) Black Students (B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 89.0 37.3 27.6 11 M 11.0 15.2 10.5 22.0 17.1

12 M 91.1 43.4 27.1 12 M 8.93  15.5 11.7 27.9 15.4

11 R 88.9 24.4 17.6 11 R 11.1 5.7 5.5 18.8 12.1

12 R 91.1 37.1 25.0 12 R 8.92  12.7 8.9 24.4 16.0

11 S 90.3 55.6 33.1 11 S 9.73  12.0 11.0 43.6 22.2

12 S 91.1 43.4 30.2 12 S 8.93  15.5 11.4 27.9 18.8

Gap Between Groups (NP - P)

Non-Poverty Students (NP) Poverty Students (P)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Page 47: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 43.3 63.7 59.7 3 M 45.0 26.3 35.3 37.4 24.4 4 M 46.2 68.5 59.9 4 M 44.9 27.7 35.2 40.8 24.7 5 M 48.0 61.0 53.7 5 M 43.4 24.7 30.3 36.3 23.4 6 M 46.7 56.2 38.4 6 M 43.5 11.6 15.3 44.6 23.1 7 M 49.1 59.6 34.1 7 M 42.4 16.6 14.7 42.9 19.3 8 M 49.4 61.3 34.6 8 M 43.3 12.0 12.6 49.3 22.0 3 R 43.3 73.0 63.1 3 R 45.0 30.0 35.9 43.1 27.1 4 R 46.3 75.5 64.9 4 R 45.0 30.4 35.1 45.1 29.8 5 R 47.9 73.9 62.5 5 R 43.4 34.4 35.1 39.6 27.3 6 R 46.8 80.8 69.0 6 R 43.4 37.9 43.0 42.9 26.1 7 R 49.2 73.6 57.0 7 R 42.4 28.9 29.1 44.6 27.9 8 R 49.3 67.5 47.4 8 R 43.5 15.6 18.4 51.9 29.1

White Students (W)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

HUNTSVILLE

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Black Students (B)

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 47.9 61.9 65.5 3 M 52.2 27.7 39.7 34.3 25.8 4 M 49.6 68.2 66.1 4 M 50.4 29.8 39.3 38.5 26.8 5 M 50.1 61.9 60.6 5 M 49.9 24.3 33.2 37.5 27.4 6 M 54.7 53.9 44.5 6 M 45.4 12.6 18.2 41.3 26.3 7 M 55.3 58.7 40.6 7 M 44.7 16.6 15.9 42.1 24.8 8 M 56.2 56.8 40.1 8 M 43.9 14.3 14.3 42.5 25.8 3 R 47.8 70.4 69.8 3 R 52.2 30.8 40.0 39.7 29.8 4 R 49.6 73.9 71.6 4 R 50.4 32.1 40.0 41.8 31.6 5 R 50.0 75.1 69.7 5 R 50.0 33.7 38.6 41.4 31.1 6 R 54.6 78.6 76.2 6 R 45.4 38.4 45.4 40.2 30.8 7 R 55.3 72.1 63.7 7 R 44.7 29.5 32.1 42.6 31.6 8 R 56.2 63.8 52.9 8 R 43.8 17.0 22.1 46.8 30.9

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Poverty Students (P)

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

Non-Poverty Students (NP)

System

Page 48: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 54.7 47.6 26.1 11 M 38.0 9.3 9.1 38.3 17.0

12 M 56.9 42.0 26.8 12 M 36.8 7.5 10.2 34.6 16.6

11 R 54.7 31.4 16.9 11 R 38.0 7.7 4.6 23.7 12.3

12 R 56.9 36.5 25.3 12 R 36.8 8.2 7.2 28.2 18.1

11 S 58.7 51.2 32.8 11 S 34.5 9.2 7.3 42.0 25.5

12 S 57.0 46.5 30.9 12 S 36.7 7.5 8.7 39.0 22.2

HUNTSVILLE

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

White Students (W) Black Students (B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 72.1 41.8 27.6 11 M 27.9 10.0 10.5 31.8 17.1

12 M 77.3 35.5 27.1 12 M 22.7 8.7 11.7 26.9 15.4

11 R 71.9 27.7 17.6 11 R 28.1 5.9 5.5 21.8 12.1

12 R 77.3 31.5 25.0 12 R 22.7 7.7 8.9 23.8 16.0

11 S 76.9 44.1 33.1 11 S 23.1 10.2 11.0 33.9 22.2

12 S 77.3 38.7 30.2 12 S 22.7 6.5 11.4 32.1 18.8

Gap Between Groups (NP - P)

Non-Poverty Students (NP) Poverty Students (P)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Page 49: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 29.7 56.4 59.7 3 M 62.5 30.8 35.3 25.6 24.4 4 M 31.6 73.1 59.9 4 M 65.0 29.8 35.2 43.3 24.7 5 M 33.9 54.7 53.7 5 M 60.7 26.3 30.3 28.4 23.4 6 M 32.4 47.6 38.4 6 M 63.0 12.8 15.3 34.9 23.1 7 M 31.9 28.4 34.1 7 M 63.4 9.4 14.7 19.1 19.3 8 M 29.9 48.4 34.6 8 M 65.1 18.8 12.6 29.6 22.0 3 R 29.4 75.3 63.1 3 R 62.7 41.9 35.9 33.4 27.1 4 R 31.5 77.4 64.9 4 R 65.1 34.9 35.1 42.5 29.8 5 R 33.8 65.1 62.5 5 R 60.8 31.9 35.1 33.2 27.3 6 R 32.5 81.0 69.0 6 R 63.2 50.5 43.0 30.5 26.1 7 R 31.9 59.8 57.0 7 R 63.8 26.5 29.1 33.3 27.9 8 R 30.2 57.9 47.4 8 R 65.4 24.8 18.4 33.1 29.1

White Students (W)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

OPELIKA

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Black Students (B)

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 32.8 59.6 65.5 3 M 67.2 31.0 39.7 28.6 25.8 4 M 34.7 70.6 66.1 4 M 65.3 29.7 39.3 40.9 26.8 5 M 32.9 61.2 60.6 5 M 67.1 26.7 33.2 34.5 27.4 6 M 34.3 49.6 44.5 6 M 65.7 11.7 18.2 37.8 26.3 7 M 37.2 27.7 40.6 7 M 62.8 9.5 15.9 18.3 24.8 8 M 43.1 46.0 40.1 8 M 56.9 16.0 14.3 30.0 25.8 3 R 32.6 78.6 69.8 3 R 67.4 39.0 40.0 39.7 29.8 4 R 34.6 74.5 71.6 4 R 65.4 35.2 40.0 39.3 31.6 5 R 32.8 68.9 69.7 5 R 67.2 33.2 38.6 35.8 31.1 6 R 34.4 82.9 76.2 6 R 65.6 49.1 45.4 33.8 30.8 7 R 37.2 56.3 63.7 7 R 62.8 25.9 32.1 30.4 31.6 8 R 43.5 54.0 52.9 8 R 56.5 20.8 22.1 33.2 30.9

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Poverty Students (P)

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

Non-Poverty Students (NP)

System

Page 50: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 35.3 35.6 26.1 11 M 61.5 10.8 9.1 24.8 17.0

12 M 39.0 29.8 26.8 12 M 57.7 13.7 10.2 16.1 16.6

11 R 35.3 19.8 16.9 11 R 61.5 2.8 4.6 17.0 12.3

12 R 39.0 27.7 25.3 12 R 57.7 9.4 7.2 18.3 18.1

11 S 37.1 49.5 32.8 11 S 59.8 10.7 7.3 38.8 25.5

12 S 39.0 51.1 30.9 12 S 57.7 13.7 8.7 37.4 22.2

OPELIKA

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

White Students (W) Black Students (B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 50.0 30.1 27.6 11 M 50.0 10.5 10.5 19.6 17.1

12 M 57.7 28.8 27.1 12 M 42.3 7.8 11.7 20.9 15.4

11 R 50.0 14.0 17.6 11 R 50.0 3.5 5.5 10.5 12.1

12 R 57.7 26.6 25.0 12 R 42.3 3.9 8.9 22.7 16.0

11 S 52.6 38.6 33.1 11 S 47.4 12.6 11.0 26.0 22.2

12 S 57.7 43.9 30.2 12 S 42.3 8.8 1.0 35.1 29.2

Gap Between Groups (NP - P)

Non-Poverty Students (NP) Poverty Students (P)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Page 51: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 35.6 53.6 59.7 3 M 61.0 38.7 35.3 14.9 24.4 4 M 36.3 67.6 59.9 4 M 60.2 38.7 35.2 28.9 24.7 5 M 34.4 46.6 53.7 5 M 61.0 31.5 30.3 15.1 23.4 6 M 30.3 28.9 38.4 6 M 66.7 9.4 15.3 19.5 23.1 7 M 30.9 17.8 34.1 7 M 65.0 5.2 14.7 12.7 19.3 8 M 29.8 32.8 34.6 8 M 67.4 15.5 12.6 17.3 22.0 3 R 35.6 59.1 63.1 3 R 61.1 38.9 35.9 20.2 27.1 4 R 36.3 70.2 64.9 4 R 60.3 37.2 35.1 33.1 29.8 5 R 34.4 60.1 62.5 5 R 61.0 35.0 35.1 25.2 27.3 6 R 30.5 65.3 69.0 6 R 66.5 36.0 43.0 29.3 26.1 7 R 31.2 44.6 57.0 7 R 64.8 23.0 29.1 21.7 27.9 8 R 29.8 44.5 47.4 8 R 67.4 19.0 18.4 25.6 29.1

White Students (W)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

PHENIX CITY

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Black Students (B)

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 29.9 61.2 65.5 3 M 70.1 37.4 39.7 23.8 25.8 4 M 30.4 63.3 66.1 4 M 69.6 42.9 39.3 20.5 26.8 5 M 31.7 48.0 60.6 5 M 68.4 32.4 33.2 15.6 27.4 6 M 23.6 34.0 44.5 6 M 76.4 9.8 18.2 24.2 26.3 7 M 29.3 20.5 40.6 7 M 70.7 5.8 15.9 14.7 24.8 8 M 28.6 34.2 40.1 8 M 71.4 15.6 14.3 18.5 25.8 3 R 29.9 70.4 69.8 3 R 70.1 37.0 40.0 33.4 29.8 4 R 30.4 68.5 71.6 4 R 69.7 41.5 40.0 26.9 31.6 5 R 31.7 57.3 69.7 5 R 68.4 38.9 38.6 18.4 31.1 6 R 23.7 78.7 76.2 6 R 76.3 35.3 45.4 43.4 30.8 7 R 29.5 55.3 63.7 7 R 70.5 20.8 32.1 34.5 31.6 8 R 28.6 46.3 52.9 8 R 71.4 19.5 22.1 26.8 30.9

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Poverty Students (P)

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

Non-Poverty Students (NP)

System

Page 52: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 28.9 14.4 26.1 11 M 68.0 5.8 9.1 8.7 17.0

12 M 34.3 14.6 26.8 12 M 64.3 8.3 10.2 6.3 16.6

11 R 28.5 13.9 16.9 11 R 68.3 3.5 4.6 10.4 12.3

12 R 34.3 18.5 25.3 12 R 64.3 5.2 7.2 13.3 18.1

11 S 30.3 22.1 32.8 11 S 66.2 3.4 7.3 18.7 25.5

12 S 34.3 18.5 30.9 12 S 64.3 4.7 8.7 13.8 22.2

PHENIX CITY

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

White Students (W) Black Students (B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 34.9 12.7 27.6 11 M 65.1 5.6 10.5 7.1 17.1

12 M 41.3 13.7 27.1 12 M 58.7 8.0 11.7 5.8 15.4

11 R 34.3 10.0 17.6 11 R 65.7 4.4 5.5 5.6 12.1

12 R 41.3 17.7 25.0 12 R 58.7 4.6 8.9 13.2 16.0

11 S 36.3 16.7 33.1 11 S 63.7 5.5 11.0 11.2 22.2

12 S 41.3 16.1 30.2 12 S 58.7 4.6 11.4 11.6 18.8

Gap Between Groups (NP - P)

Non-Poverty Students (NP) Poverty Students (P)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Page 53: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 5.5 77.8 59.7 3 M 93.9 48.7 35.3 29.1 24.4 4 M 4.6 66.7 59.9 4 M 94.2 35.1 35.2 31.6 24.7 5 M 5.8 61.1 53.7 5 M 93.8 29.4 30.3 31.7 23.4 6 M 0.3 6 M 99.0 12.6 15.3 7 M 7 M 99.6 6.8 14.7 8 M 8 M 100.0 7.5 12.6 3 R 5.5 83.3 63.1 3 R 93.9 40.9 35.9 42.5 27.1 4 R 4.6 60.0 64.9 4 R 94.2 34.0 35.1 26.0 29.8 5 R 5.9 77.8 62.5 5 R 93.8 34.7 35.1 43.1 27.3 6 R 0.3 6 R 99.0 38.2 43.0 7 R 7 R 99.6 21.9 29.1 8 R 8 R 100.0 15.1 18.4

White Students (W)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

SELMA

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Black Students (B)

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 15.3 68.0 65.5 3 M 84.7 47.5 39.7 20.5 25.8 4 M 10.7 60.0 66.1 4 M 89.3 34.6 39.3 25.4 26.8 5 M 14.0 41.9 60.6 5 M 86.0 29.4 33.2 12.4 27.4 6 M 13.2 32.5 44.5 6 M 86.8 10.2 18.2 22.3 26.3 7 M 12.1 17.7 40.6 7 M 87.9 5.3 15.9 12.4 24.8 8 M 13.3 25.0 40.1 8 M 86.7 4.8 14.3 20.2 25.8 3 R 15.3 68.0 69.8 3 R 84.7 38.8 40.0 29.2 29.8 4 R 10.7 60.0 71.6 4 R 89.3 32.8 40.0 27.2 31.6 5 R 14.0 65.1 69.7 5 R 86.0 33.0 38.6 32.2 31.1 6 R 13.2 62.5 76.2 6 R 86.8 34.9 45.4 27.7 30.8 7 R 12.2 38.2 63.7 7 R 87.8 20.0 32.1 18.2 31.6 8 R 86.6 10.6 52.9 8 R 84.7 38.8 22.1 (28.1) 30.9

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Poverty Students (P)

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

Non-Poverty Students (NP)

System

Page 54: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 0.6 11 M 99.4 2.9 9.1

12 M 0.5 12 M 99.1 4.2 10.2

11 R 0.6 11 R 99.4 5.3 4.6

12 R 0.5 12 R 99.1 10.3 7.2

11 S - 11 S 100.0 5.3 7.3

12 S 0.5 12 S 99.1 7.0 8.7

SELMA

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

White Students (W) Black Students (B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 23.3 5.0 27.6 11 M 76.7 2.3 10.5 2.7 17.1

12 M 15.7 14.7 27.1 12 M 84.3 2.2 11.7 12.5 15.4

11 R 23.3 10.0 17.6 11 R 76.7 3.8 5.5 6.2 12.1

12 R 15.7 23.5 25.0 12 R 84.3 7.7 8.9 15.8 16.0

11 S 26.3 - 33.1 11 S 73.7 7.1 11.0 (7.1) 22.2

12 S 15.8 14.7 30.2 12 S 84.2 5.5 11.4 9.2 18.8

Gap Between Groups (NP - P)

Non-Poverty Students (NP) Poverty Students (P)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Page 55: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 22.3 72.0 59.7 3 M 73.4 25.4 35.3 46.7 24.4 4 M 23.0 76.1 59.9 4 M 72.8 24.2 35.2 51.9 24.7 5 M 20.7 66.7 53.7 5 M 74.1 30.0 30.3 36.7 23.4 6 M 19.2 61.0 38.4 6 M 77.6 8.6 15.3 52.4 23.1 7 M 21.1 53.9 34.1 7 M 76.6 11.0 14.7 42.9 19.3 8 M 18.0 51.2 34.6 8 M 79.2 5.4 12.6 45.8 22.0 3 R 22.3 85.5 63.1 3 R 73.5 27.1 35.9 58.4 27.1 4 R 23.2 82.7 64.9 4 R 73.0 26.1 35.1 56.6 29.8 5 R 20.8 84.0 62.5 5 R 74.4 34.1 35.1 49.9 27.3 6 R 19.3 80.9 69.0 6 R 78.0 37.0 43.0 43.8 26.1 7 R 21.5 75.5 57.0 7 R 76.4 29.9 29.1 45.6 27.9 8 R 18.0 68.5 47.4 8 R 79.3 17.4 18.4 51.1 29.1

White Students (W)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

TUSCALOOSA

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Black Students (B)

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

3 M 32.1 64.4 65.5 3 M 68.0 24.7 39.7 39.7 25.8 4 M 34.1 66.3 66.1 4 M 65.9 21.8 39.3 44.5 26.8 5 M 32.2 62.0 60.6 5 M 67.8 29.0 33.2 33.0 27.4 6 M 33.0 41.3 44.5 6 M 67.0 8.6 18.2 32.8 26.3 7 M 35.8 44.3 40.6 7 M 64.2 7.0 15.9 37.4 24.8 8 M 34.2 34.0 40.1 8 M 65.8 4.1 14.3 29.9 25.8 3 R 32.2 74.6 69.8 3 R 67.8 25.5 40.0 49.1 29.8 4 R 34.0 71.3 71.6 4 R 66.0 24.3 40.0 47.0 31.6 5 R 32.0 75.4 69.7 5 R 68.0 31.8 38.6 43.6 31.1 6 R 32.8 69.6 76.2 6 R 67.2 34.2 45.4 35.4 30.8 7 R 35.5 66.2 63.7 7 R 64.5 25.4 32.1 40.8 31.6 8 R 34.1 50.4 52.9 8 R 65.9 15.5 22.1 34.9 30.9

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

Poverty Students (P)

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

Non-Poverty Students (NP)

System

Page 56: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 24.0 28.6 26.1 11 M 71.6 5.5 9.1 23.1 17.0

12 M 28.3 36.6 26.8 12 M 68.2 6.8 10.2 29.9 16.6

11 R 24.0 26.5 16.9 11 R 71.6 2.3 4.6 24.3 12.3

12 R 28.3 44.8 25.3 12 R 68.2 6.3 7.2 38.5 18.1

11 S 28.5 36.4 32.8 11 S 66.8 5.2 7.3 31.2 25.5

12 S 28.4 39.5 30.9 12 S 68.1 10.4 8.7 29.1 22.2

TUSCALOOSA

Gap Between Groups (W - B)

White Students (W) Black Students (B)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

State State

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

% in Group

% at Level IV

% at Level IV

System Gap (%)

State Gap (%)

11 M 48.3 20.3 27.6 11 M 51.7 5.4 10.5 14.9 17.1

12 M 57.5 23.5 27.1 12 M 42.5 7.0 11.7 16.5 15.4

11 R 48.3 16.9 17.6 11 R 51.7 1.9 5.5 15.0 12.1

12 R 57.5 28.7 25.0 12 R 42.5 5.4 8.9 23.2 16.0

11 S 53.7 23.3 33.1 11 S 46.3 6.5 11.0 16.8 22.2

12 S 57.5 27.9 30.2 12 S 42.5 9.3 11.4 18.5 18.8

Gap Between Groups (NP - P)

Non-Poverty Students (NP) Poverty Students (P)

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Gra

de

Tes

t

System

Page 57: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

Does the system prepare Does the system prepare students for higher students for higher education and the education and the

workforce?workforce?

Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama

Page 58: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

How we measure preparation for How we measure preparation for higher education and the workforce.higher education and the workforce.

Graduation rate, dropout rate

ACT college entrance exam average score and participation

If available, Advanced Placement participation and success

Page 59: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

1st2nd

3rd4th

5th6th

7th8th

9th10th

11th12th

Completers

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000Class of 2007 Class of 2008

Enrollment History, Statewide

32%

Page 60: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

1st2nd

3rd4th

5th6th

7th8th

9th10th

11th12th

Completers

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Class of 2007 Class of 2008

Enrollment History, Dothan

24%

Page 61: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

1st2nd

3rd4th

5th6th

7th8th

9th10th

11th12th

Completers

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Class of 2007 Class of 2008

Enrollment History, Alexander City

Page 62: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

1st2nd

3rd4th

5th6th

7th8th

9th10th

11th12th

Completers

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Class of 2007 Class of 2008

Enrollment History, Auburn

Page 63: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

1st2nd

3rd4th

5th6th

7th8th

9th10th

11th12th

Completers

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Class of 2007 Class of 2008

Enrollment History, Decatur

Page 64: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

1st2nd

3rd4th

5th6th

7th8th

9th10th

11th12th

Completers

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500Class of 2007 Class of 2008

Enrollment History, Enterprise

Page 65: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

1st2nd

3rd4th

5th6th

7th8th

9th10th

11th12th

Completers

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Class of 2007 Class of 2008

Enrollment History, Florence

Page 66: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

1st2nd

3rd4th

5th6th

7th8th

9th10th

11th12th

Completers

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

Class of 2007 Class of 2008

Enrollment History, Gadsden

Page 67: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

1st2nd

3rd4th

5th6th

7th8th

9th10th

11th12th

Completers

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

Class of 2007 Class of 2008

Enrollment History, Hoover

Page 68: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

1st2nd

3rd4th

5th6th

7th8th

9th10th

11th12th

Completers

0

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

1,500

1,750

2,000

2,250

Class of 2007 Class of 2008

Enrollment History, Huntsville

Page 69: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

1st2nd

3rd4th

5th6th

7th8th

9th10th

11th12th

Completers

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Class of 2007 Class of 2008

Enrollment History, Opelika

Page 70: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

1st2nd

3rd4th

5th6th

7th8th

9th10th

11th12th

Completers

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

Class of 2007 Class of 2008

Enrollment History, Phenix City

Page 71: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

1st2nd

3rd4th

5th6th

7th8th

9th10th

11th12th

Completers

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Class of 2007 Class of 2008

Enrollment History, Selma

Page 72: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools

1st2nd

3rd4th

5th6th

7th8th

9th10th

11th12th

Completers

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

Class of 2007 Class of 2008

Enrollment History, Tuscaloosa

Page 73: System Performance  Comparisons for  Dothan City Schools