System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

download System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

of 38

Transcript of System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    1/38

    www.danfoss.com

    Hernan Hidalgo, Danfoss Inc.System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    2/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 2Danfoss Automatic Controls

    Content

    Most Common Refrigeration Systems

    Considerations for CO2 use Brine Principle. Volatile vs. Glycol

    Pressure Rating Considerations

    Energy Consumption Analysis

    Control in CO2 High Temp Rooms

    Defrost Strategies

    Moisture in CO2 systems

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    3/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 3Danfoss Automatic Controls

    NH3 systems. Low,Medium,High Temp

    NH3/Glycol Systems. Medium Temp

    NH3/CO2 Cascade systems. Medium/Low Temp NH3/CO2 Brine systems. Medium / Low Temp

    Systems overview

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    4/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 4Danfoss Automatic Controls

    Indirect Cooling - Considerations

    NH3chargereduction

    Largenumberofstaffinprocessareas

    InsurancePremiums Riskassessment

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    5/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 5Danfoss Automatic Controls

    NH3/Glycol Layout

    NH3 NH3

    Cold Glycol

    Warm Glycol

    Supply Pump

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    6/38System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 6Danfoss Automatic Controls

    Large Footprint

    Typically two large expansion tanks required for

    pump units Larger Pipe Sizes / More Insulation

    Higher Pumping kW

    Glycol Mixture Monitoring

    Glycol Systems

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    7/38System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 7Danfoss Automatic Controls

    CO2 Overview

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    8/38System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 8Danfoss Automatic Controls

    NH3 Compresor(s)

    Cascade

    Heat

    Exchanger

    Evaporator

    ICM Motorized valve

    CO2 pump

    NH3 CO2pumped

    CO2 separator

    Low temperature CO2 High Side - NH3

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    9/38System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 9Danfoss Automatic Controls

    NH3CO2on PH

    -15 oC (23 bar)

    Enthalpy

    CO2+5 oF (333 psi)

    Enthalpy

    R717

    +30 oC (12 bar)

    +86o

    F (171 psi)

    -20 oC (1,9 bar)-4 oF (28 psi)

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    10/38System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 10Danfoss Automatic Controls

    CO2highdensityprovides

    considerableadvantages

    inwetordrysuctionlines

    Pressuredrop

    equivalentto

    loweringevaporating

    temperature1.8F

    CO2 Wet Suction Pressure drop

    Evap Temp. NH3 CO2

    32F 2.3 psig 14.5 psig

    -4F 1.2 psig 9 psig

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    11/38System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 11Danfoss Automatic Controls

    HighPressureCascadeHeatExchanger

    RefrigerationloadinCO2asbrinesystembalances

    automatically

    Oilfreeoperation

    LowerPumpingkW

    Lowerenergyconsumptioncomparedtoglycol

    counterparts

    CO2 Pump Systems

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    12/38System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 12Danfoss Automatic Controls

    CO2 Pump System PH Overview

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    13/38System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 13Danfoss Automatic Controls

    High Heat Transfer Coefficient

    Higher efficiency is noticeable at the cascade

    heat exchanger TD between NH3/CO2 is considerably lower than

    NH3/glycol

    Higher suction temp of cascade fluid

    Line sizes are significantly reduced

    Lower Pump Power

    EnergyEfficiencyCO2asBrineSystems

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    14/38System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 14Danfoss Automatic Controls

    PipeLineSizeComparison

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    15/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 15Danfoss Automatic Controls

    Low Recirculation rates than ammonia systems

    Recirculation varies between 1.1 to 1.5

    Volatile brine vs. Glycol sensible heat gain

    CO2 pumps consume on average 90% less

    energy required compared to water basedbrines

    Energy Consumption

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    16/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 16Danfoss Automatic Controls

    A system operating at 14F (-10 C)

    Mglycol = Q / (C T )

    MCO2 = Q / H Latent heat CO2 at 14F (-10C): 112BTU/lb

    (260kJ/kg)

    Cglycol = 0.72 BTU/lb-F (3.42) ; T = 7.2F (4K)typical

    Mass flow required to reject 247BTU/s (260kW)

    cooling load

    MCO2: ~ 2.2 lbs/s (1 kg/s) vs. ME. Glycol: 45.4 lbs/s(20 kg / s)

    CO2 vs. Glycol Mass Flow Comparison

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    17/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 17Danfoss Automatic Controls

    Calculation Example

    Capacity: 142TR (500kW)

    CO2 recirc. rate : 1.5 to 1

    Differential Head: 82 ft (25m)

    T glycol inlet/outlet: 7.2F (4K)

    CO2 = 75%

    CO2 vs. Glycol Pump Power Comparison

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    18/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 18Danfoss Automatic Controls

    CO2 vs. Glycol Relative PumpingPower

    FluidPower kW

    14 F (-10C) .-4 F(-20C)

    CO2 0.97 0.85

    CaCl2 13.34 14.22Hycool 16.02 16.15

    Ethylene Glycol 15.87 18.8

    Propylene Glycol 14.03 16.68

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    19/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 19Danfoss Automatic Controls

    SimplifiedAssessment.(Nodefrostandothervariablesconsidered)

    Prequired=Pcompr+Ppumps

    Pcompr= Qoadjusted/COP

    COP:Calculationpurposes1.9for4F airand3.8

    for32

    F

    UsingPackCalculationIIandCO2brinecalculator

    v.3.91:fora215TR(750kW)plantandroomair

    temperatureof39F(5 C)

    Total Energy Consumption

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    20/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 20Danfoss Automatic Controls

    Total Energy Consumption

    CO2

    Ethylene

    Glycol Units

    Air temperature, tair 39 39 F

    Cooling power, Qo 215 215 TR

    Circulation rate, n 1.5 -Temp. dif. in evap., dtevap 9 13 F

    Temp. dif. in PHE, dtPHE 7.2 9 F

    Brine temp. dif., tout - tin 0 7.2 F

    Evaporating temp., to 25 19.5 F

    Additional heat gains, kq 5% 7% %

    Additional heat gains, Qadd 37.5 50.6 kW

    Pump head pressure, Hpump 37 37 psig

    Pump power cons., Ppump 1.6 16.6 kW

    Adjusted cooling power,

    Qo,ad 789.1 815.6 kW

    Compr. power cons., Pcomp 170.8 196.2 kW

    Total install energy cons. 172.4 212.8 kW

    Total daily energy cons. 3,112.9 3,930.3 kW*h

    Energy savings 21% %

    Table 2. Energy Consumption Comparison

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    21/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 21Danfoss Automatic Controls

    CO2offersfasterreactiontime.However:

    Savingsalsodependon

    LoadPatterns

    DefrostType

    ControlStrategy

    Useof

    VFD

    Results

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    22/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 22Danfoss Automatic Controls

    Inanattempttovalidatetheoreticalcalculations,datafromtwodistributioncentersforfruitslocated

    intwo

    different

    climates

    has

    been

    analyzed

    Anadjustmenthasbeenmadetooffsetclimate

    influence

    Two Sites Comparison

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    23/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 23Danfoss Automatic Controls

    Two Sites ComparisonConditions / Location North Italy The Netherlands

    Storage type Fruit Fruit

    Air temperature Avera 34F Aver 32F

    Suction temperature 8.6 F 13 F

    Brine Type Glycol CO2

    Media temperature (for glycol in/out) F .=17.6 / 25 18.5

    Temperature difference in cascade heat exchanger difference,

    F 9 to 12 5.5 to 7.2

    Cooler temperature difference, F 8 to 12 8

    Lighting, estimated from the total load 10% 5%

    Total fans installed, kW 74.145.3 (fans are running only

    20% of the time)

    Total consumed, kW h (measured figure) 1.300.000 2.700.000

    Total compressors and pumps, kW h (calculated, excluding

    lights and excluding fans) 576607 1245025

    Region corrected consumption, kW h, by PackCalculation II

    software, according to the assumptions above, everythingadjusted to the Netherlands climate 518000 1245025

    Average consumption, kW (calculated by PackCalculation II

    software to fit the corrected consumption) 188 660

    Per unit of cooling consumption kW h/kW cooling (corrected

    consumption / average consumption) 2.75 1.88

    Difference in Energy Consumption 32% HigherTable 3. Actual Energy Consumption site comparison

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    24/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 24Danfoss Automatic Controls

    Measuredvalue:kW/kWh

    Thougha32%differenceissubstantial,large

    deviationsoccur

    due

    to

    other

    variables

    Site Results

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    25/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 25Danfoss Automatic Controls

    NH3 Systems Medium, High Temp

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    26/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 26Danfoss Automatic Controls

    PWM in high temp CO2

    PWM

    Raising 15F by means of a pressureregulator requires a 106 psi increase in

    CO2 pump pressure making it impractical

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    27/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 27Danfoss Automatic Controls

    PWM Control Principle

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    28/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 28Danfoss Automatic Controls

    CO2 Brine System Control

    ICF valve stations feeding penthouse units

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    29/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 29Danfoss Automatic Controls

    CO2 Brine Pump Package

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    30/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 30Danfoss Automatic Controls

    CO2 receiver

    AuxiliaryRefrigeration

    system(Condensing)

    Dedicatedgenerator

    PS

    Auxiliary cooling system - in case of power failure

    Capacity dependent of system design and ambient temperature(~ 4kW / 1000 kW)

    St a n d s t i l l t e m p e r a t u r e co n t r o l

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    31/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 31Danfoss Automatic Controls

    Common defrost strategy for CO2 brine systems:

    Electrical (similar to standard brines)

    Brine defrost (additional system)

    Water defrost (drain required)

    Hot gas defrost. The availability of components rated at 754 psig (52 bar) hasmade possible to use one of the most efficient defrost strategies

    (requires additional vessel and HE heated by HP stage) There is a system

    available patented by Star Refrigeration - UK

    D e f r o s t

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    32/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 32Danfoss Automatic Controls

    H o t Ga s D e f r o s t Co n t r o l

    PWM technology

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    33/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 33Danfoss Automatic Controls

    El e c t r i c D e f r o s t

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    34/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 34Danfoss Automatic Controls

    Moisture in CO2 Systems

    W t S l bilit i h

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    35/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 35Danfoss Automatic Controls

    Water Solubility in vapor phase

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    36/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 36Danfoss Automatic Controls

    R134a

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    37/38

    System Design for CO2 | Hernan Hidalgo April 2012 | 37Danfoss Automatic Controls

    Moisture in CO2 vapor phase

    RH = 0% RH = 100% RH >> 100%

    Relative Humidity

    Tem

    perature[C

    ]

    0

    -40

    Safe

    Perform

    ance

    Other

    Problems!

    Chemical

    Rection

    Sensitive:

    Solenoid

    valves

    Pistonequipment

    Functionality ProblemsOtherequipment:

    Strainers

    Compressor

    Free

    Water

    Ice

    7ppm

    50

    ppm

    90ppm

    20

  • 8/9/2019 System Design for CO2 Secondary Coolant Based System

    38/38

    Service

    Infiltration

    CO2 supplier

    Start-upvacuum

    Filter driers continuous process

    Deep vacuum, extra careon commissioning and start-up

    Where Moisture comes from ?

    WatercontentinaCO2

    system

    Note: 1 gram of water in 1000 kg of CO2 1 ppm