Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN
Transcript of Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN
![Page 1: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
© 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
Precise time. Synchronized.
Kishan Shenoi
CTO, Qulsar, Inc
Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RANITSF 2017
Warsaw, Nov. 2017
![Page 2: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
PAGE 2 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
Outline of Presentation
◀ The underlying premise
◀ Evolution of a Base-Station
– Integrated to Distributed
– Considerations (time/frequency related)
◀ Evolution to a C-RAN architecture
◀ C-RAN and Small Cell deployments
(synchronization perspective)
◀ Concluding Remarks
![Page 3: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
PAGE 3 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
◀ There will be a large number of “wireless points of presence”, namely cellular antennas.– Traditionally, each antenna was associated with a complete base-station
– The DAS (Distributed Antenna System) has a base-band unit with multiple antennas
◀ These antennas (“base-stations”) will be deployed in clusters with coordinated actions mainly involving antennas of the same cluster.
◀ The antennas (“RRH”) of a cluster can all home into a common base-band unit (BBU)
◀ From a timing perspective:– The synchronization between antennas of a cluster must be stringent
– The synchronization between antennas of different clusters can be “relaxed”
The Premise
![Page 4: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
PAGE 4 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
◀ BBU-RRH “fronthaul” likely to be over Ethernet
◀ Base-station (BBU or MacroBS) derives timing using PTP (+SyncE) (could be APTSC) from a close-in GM (EGM)
◀ “X” likely to be less than ~500ns, closer to ~200ns
Cluster Synchronization
Antenna “cluster”
Xμs inter-cell
sync
Xμs~3 μs
~1.5 μs
RRH
BBU
EGM
BBU
Macro
Base-station
x1
x1
x2
x2
x2
x2
RRH
X2 < (X/2)
(X1 + X2) < 1.5ms
![Page 5: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
PAGE 5 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
Timing Requirements
Standard Frequency Phase Remarks
3G UMTS 50 ppb Not required
CDMA 50 ppb 10 μs Different standard
LTE-FDD 50 ppb None
LTE-TDD 50 ppb ±5 μs
+ MBMS ±10 μsOn top of either LTE- TDD /
LTE-FDD
+ eICIC ±5 μsTighter sync results in
better performance
+ CoMP ±1.5 ─ ±0.5 μsTighter sync results
results in better
performance
Tighter sync performance results in higher spectral
efficiencies greater traffic carrying capacity
These requirements apply at the antenna (air interface)
Many diverse opinions
![Page 6: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
PAGE 6 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
Evolution of a Base-Station
Control
Timing
Tra
nsport
Base-B
and
RF
Backhaul
(Ethernet)
S1/X2
RF (Coax) (analog)
Antenna
Assembly
Integrated Base-
Station
Control
Timing
Tra
nsport
Base-B
and
RRH
Backhaul
(Ethernet)
S1/X2
Antenna
Assembly
Q
I
BB Samples
(Fiber)
(Digital)
MU
X
BBU
Timing
Distributed
Base-Station
One BBU may
support
multiple RRH
![Page 7: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
PAGE 7 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
◀ Integrated Base-Station:– RF signal generated in the integrated unit and fed
over coax to antenna unit
– Cable loss, time-delay, and frequency shaping are all
a function of cable length (distance between
electronics and antenna)
– Good control of D/A conversion and modulation
operation because of “single” clock in device
Important Considerations ─ 1
![Page 8: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
PAGE 8 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
◀ Distributed Base-Station:
– Base-Band Unit (BBU) generates the baseband version of transmit signal (In-phase and Quadrature signals) in digital format (typically 30.72MHz sampling rate, 15-bits/sample, per signal);
– RF Signal attenuation and frequency shaping are not a function of cable distance between BBU and Remote Radio Head (RRH)
– Need to transfer timing information from BBU to RRH
– Time and frequency effects are still an important issue• Cable length introduces delay due to propagation
• Clock regeneration adds wander/jitter
Important Considerations ─ 2
![Page 9: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
PAGE 9 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
◀ Base-Band Signal: 𝑥 𝑛𝑇𝑠 = 𝑥𝐼 𝑛𝑇𝑠 + 𝑗𝑥𝑄 𝑛𝑇𝑠
◀ RF Signal:𝑤 𝑡 = ො𝑥𝐼 𝑡 − 𝛿 ∙ 𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝜔𝐶𝑡 + 𝜑𝐼 𝑡 + ො𝑥𝑄(𝑡 − 𝛿) ∙ 𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝜔𝐶𝑡 + 𝜑𝑄(𝑡)
◀ Deleterious impact of delay (d) (uncertainty):
– In TDD mode this delay uncertainty necessitates greater inter-
burst gap and therefore reduces bandwidth utilization
– Some LTE features have reduced performance with increasing
time error including: eICIC, CoMP, MBMS, etc.
◀ Deleterious impact of jitter and wander (j): not well
documented but known to have negative impact on
carrier as well as D/A conversion (affects SNR, BER,
etc.)
Important Considerations ─ 3
![Page 10: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
PAGE 10 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
◀ Antenna system (RRH) can be disjoint from the BBU
◀ Given that the BBU-to-RRH link is suitably implemented, there is no stringent geographic linkage between BBU and RRH
◀ It is possible to co-locate multiple BBUs independently of the deployment of the (RF) antenna assembly
◀ C-RAN: antennas (RRH) located where the mobiles are; BBUs are located where building space (power, ground, air-conditioning, etc.) is available
Evolution to a C-RAN Architecture
Distributed Base-Station
Control
Timing
Tra
nsport
Base-B
and
RRH
Backhaul
(Ethernet)
S1/X2
Antenna
Assembly
Q
I
BB Samples
(Fiber)
(Digital)M
UX
BBU
Timing
Provided that the timing constraints
(time/frequency) are satisfied
![Page 11: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
PAGE 11 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
◀ Base-Band units (BBUs) are co-located and each BBU has a link to an RRH carrying the base-band signal samples
◀ RRH units are deployed according to cellular traffic needs
◀ BBU and RRH have to be (mutually) synchronized
◀ Functional split between BBU and RRH is a design choice
– Latency and sync requirements depend on the functional split
C-RAN Architecture
BBUBBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBURRH
BBURRH
BBURRH
![Page 12: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
PAGE 12 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
C-RAN Synchronization
= Switch
RRHs
Edge Grand
Master
BBU
0.5 μs intra-RRH sync
…
SlaveRRH
Backhaul (GM)…
SlaveRRHRRHs(slaves)
BBUs
Expanded logical picture:
RRH “fronthaul” likely to be
over Ethernet
RRH derives timing using PTP (+Phy_Layer) from BBU
![Page 13: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
PAGE 13 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
C-RAN (Small Cell) Synchronization
◀ Similar issues for synchronization in Small Cell and C-RAN deployment scenarios
◀ Boundary clocks in every BBU; Limited number of hops between master-slave
◀ Hold-over oscillators deployed in BBU / Edge Grand Master
– End-points need to be inexpensive
◀ Synchronization requirement is stringent between RRHs in cluster; “regular” LTE requirements between clusters
◀ Recommend BBU to RRH link switches support at least Phy_layer sync & T-BC/T-TC if practical
![Page 14: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
PAGE 14 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
◀ Network between BBU and RRH emulated as 10-switch network (based on G.8261) with TC12 traffic loading (80%)
◀ Case 1 (blue) : using a TCXO with physical layer assist (SyncE)
◀ Case 2 (red) : using an OCXO without physical layer assist
◀ Both cases: 32 packets/sec (sync and delay_request)
◀ Asymmetry “added” to offset graphs
Supporting Test Results
Time Error
![Page 15: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
PAGE 15 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
◀ Network between BBU and RRH emulated as 10-switch network
(based on G.8261) with TC12 traffic loading (80%)
◀ Case 1 (blue) : using a TCXO with physical layer assist (SyncE)
– Peak-to-Peak time error (limiting MTIE): ~35ns
◀ Case 2 (red) : using an OCXO without physical layer assist
– Peak-to-Peak time error (limiting MTIE): ~45ns
Supporting Test Results
MTIE
![Page 16: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
PAGE 16 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
Concluding Remarks
C-RAN architecture is a logical extension of a
distributed base-station
In a C-RAN situation there is likely to be a
switched Ethernet Fronthaul network
Timing distribution architectures for C-RAN must
support tight (of the order of 100ns or less)
between BBU and RRH
These tight synchronization requirements can be
achieved (cost-effectively) by ensuring the
Fronthaul supports physical layer timing; Full-on-
path support is helpful.
![Page 17: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
PAGE 17 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
1798 Technology Dr.Suite 139San Jose, CAUSA
Torshamnsgatan 35SE-164 40 Kista
Sweden
![Page 18: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
PAGE 18 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
Back-up Slides
![Page 19: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
PAGE 19 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
Use case architectures: BBU – RRH split
services
SON
OAM
Apps
PDCP RLC
MAC
upper lower
PHY
upper lower
PDCP-RLC
RLC-MAC
Split - Mac
MAC-
PHY
(FAPI)
Split - PHY
Small Cell Forum: Small cell
virtualization and functional splits
![Page 20: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
PAGE 20 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
Application Environment
DHCP/DNS NTP/PTP
Platform Services
NTS OAM
Virtual Switch
Hardware Resources
Compute I/O I/O ComputeI/O
Hypervisor
User Traffic
(to/from Core
Network)
User Traffic(to/from Remote
Small Cell)
Virtualized services on the BBU
Timing is a platform service
Source: Small Cell Forum
![Page 21: Synchronization for Wireless Fronthaul and C-RAN](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022012021/6168a341d394e9041f716457/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
PAGE 21 © 2015 QULSAR, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Proprietary and Confidential
C-RAN survey results
Cost savings are major motivation for C-RAN adoptionBut yet difficult to assess cost savings in the long term
Courtesy: CRAN Webinar Sept 9’2015 Senza Fili Consulting LLC 2015
C-RAN and small cells strengthen each other value proposition
Fiber availability is still perceived as the major obstacle to C-RAN adoption