Symptomatic Management of Nephrotic Syndrome in Children
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
cristina-fernandez-valencia -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Symptomatic Management of Nephrotic Syndrome in Children
![Page 1: Symptomatic Management of Nephrotic Syndrome in Children](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100514/5695cf6f1a28ab9b028e1231/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
7/23/2019 Symptomatic Management of Nephrotic Syndrome in Children
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/symptomatic-management-of-nephrotic-syndrome-in-children 1/6
14/10/2015 Symptomatic management of nephrotic syndrome in children
http://www.uptodate.com/contents/symptomatic-m anagement-of-nephrotic-syndrome-in-chil dren?topicKey=PEDS%2F6113&elapsedTimeMs=13&source=sea…
Offi cial reprint from UpToDatewww.uptodate.com ©2015 UpToDate
Author Patrick Niaudet, MD
Section Editor Tej K Mattoo, MD, DCH, FRCP
Deputy Editor Melanie S Kim, MD
Symptomatic management of nephrotic syndrome in children
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: Sep 2015. | This topic last updated: Feb 28, 2014.
INTRODUCTION — The nephrotic syndrome (NS) is caused by renal diseases that increase the permeability
across the glomerular filtration barrier. It is classically characterized by four clinical fe atures, but the first two are
used diagnostically because the last two may not be seen in all patients:
Idiopathic NS is the most common form of NS in children, representing more than 90 percent of cases before 10
years of age and 50 percent after 10 years of age. The majority of children with NS will respond to steroid therapy.However, symptomatic treatment is important in the early course of therapy, as response to steroid therapy may
take several weeks. Symptomatic treatment also becomes the mainstay of therapy in children who fail to respond
to steroids, especially in those with genetic mutations that cause their NS.
The symptomatic management of nephrotic syndrome in children will be reviewed here. Specific treatment of
nephrotic syndrome in children is discussed separately. (See "Treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in
children".)
EDEMA
Salt restriction — Edema is treated by salt restriction because renal retention of sodium is one of two principal
mechanisms that lead to edema in the nephrotic syndrome (NS). In an already edematous patient, salt restriction
alone will not significantly improve edema, but can reduce further accumulation of fluid. (See "Pathophysiology and
treatment of edema in patients with the nephrotic syndrome", section on 'Evidence supporting primary renal
sodium retention'.)
Diuretics — Although diuretics are commonly used in adults with NS, their role in often severely hypoalbuminemic
children is less clear. Affected children may be intravascularly volume depleted and aggressive diuresis may lead
to further volume depletion, thereby possibly precipitating acute renal failur e and increasing the risk of thrombosis
in this already susceptible group of patients [1,2]. Rarely, diuretics can contribute to severe volume depletion that
results in hypovolemic shock [3]. (See "Complications of nephrotic syndrome in children", section on
'Hypovolemia'.)
Diuretics should only be given in cases of severe edema and only if there is not significant intravascular volume
depletion. In a study of 30 children with NS and severe edema, the use of fractional excretion of sodium (FeNa)
distinguished patients with volume expansion (FeNa >2 percent) from those with volume contraction (FeNa <2
percent) [4]. Diuretic therapy alone was used successfully in 10 of 11 patients with FeNa greater than 2 percent.
In one patient with an elevated FeNa, albumin was added to diuretic therapy because of a rise in serum creatinine
and the development of hyponatremia. The volume contracted group (ie, FeNa <2 percent) also had higher serum
renin, aldosterone, and antidiuretic hormone. (See "Fractional excretion of sodium, urea, and other molecules in
acute kidney injury (acute renal failure)".)
Furosemide may be given intravenously or orally without albumin. Although it is somewhat less effective, it can be
®
®
Nephrotic range proteinuria − Urine protein excretion greater than 50 mg/kg per day
Hypoalbuminemia − Serum albumin <3 g/dL (30 g/L)
Edema
Hyperlipidemia
![Page 2: Symptomatic Management of Nephrotic Syndrome in Children](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100514/5695cf6f1a28ab9b028e1231/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
7/23/2019 Symptomatic Management of Nephrotic Syndrome in Children
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/symptomatic-management-of-nephrotic-syndrome-in-children 2/6
14/10/2015 Symptomatic management of nephrotic syndrome in children
http://www.uptodate.com/contents/symptomatic-m anagement-of-nephrotic-syndrome-in-chil dren?topicKey=PEDS%2F6113&elapsedTimeMs=13&source=sea…
useful when given alone. Ongoing oral use of furosemide can still cause hypovolemia and hypokalemia, and close
monitoring of the patient is required.
Other diuretics used in childhood NS include:
Because of the potential for serious complications, diuretic management should be supervised by a nephrologist
who has expertise in treating children with NS.
Furosemide and albumin — Patients with anasarca (generalized and massive edema) may be treated with
furosemide (1 to 2 mg/kg per dose) in combination with salt-poor albumin (0.5 to 1 g/kg infused over four hours).
(See "Complications of nephrotic syndrome in children", section on 'Anasarca' .)
Albumin raises the intravascular oncotic pressure and thereby protects the intravascular compartment againstvolume contraction. Albumin infusion also increases protein-binding of furosemide, which improves the rate of
delivery to the kidney resulting in increased renal salt excretion. (See "Pathophysiology and treatment of edema in
patients with the nephrotic syndrome", section on 'Treatment'.)
In a retrospective study, albumin and furosemide therapy in children with NS effectively removed fluid with a mean
loss of 0.4 kg (1.2 percent of body weight) per infusion [8]. However, the effect is transient and can be associated
with complications resulting from increased vascular volume, including hypertension and respiratory distress. As a
result, aggressive diuresis with albumin and furosemide therapy should be reserved for patients with anasarca who
have respiratory compromise due to ascites and/or pleural effusions, severe scrotal edema sufficient to threaten
perforation, peritonitis, or severe tissue breakdown [1,9]. Other measures, such as salt and fluid restriction, are
needed to prevent reaccumulation of fluid. (See "Etiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of nephrotic
syndrome in children", section on 'Clinical manifestations'.)
Fluid restriction — Although there is debate on the role of fluid restriction, initial restriction of fluid intake to an
equivalent volume of the patient's insensible losses plus his/her urine output will result in stabilizing the patient's
weight without further accumulation of edema. In patients with hyponatremia with a serum sodium of less than 135
mEq/L, fluid restriction is required as fluid accumulation is a result of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion,
secondary to intravascular volume depletion. (See "Maintenance fluid therapy in children", section on 'Sensible and
insensible water loss'.)
HYPERCOAGULABILITY — Nephrotic patients with severe hypoalbuminemia are at risk for thromboembolic
complications. Preventative measures include regular ambulation, avoidance of hemoconcentration resulting from
hypovolemia, avoidance of central venous catheter if possible, and early treatment of sepsis or volume depletion[10]. (See "Complications of nephrotic syndrome in children", section on 'Thromboembolism' and "Renal vein
thrombosis and hypercoagulable state in nephrotic syndrome", section on 'Pathogenesis'.)
Most clinicians do not give prophylactic anticoagulation initially. This is due in large part to the lack of randomized
trials to determine the efficacy and safety of such an approach [11]. In some centers, prophylactic warfarin therapy
is given to high-risk patients including adolescents (>12 years of age), or those with a serum albumin
concentration of less than 2 g/dL (20 g/L), a fibrinogen level of more than 6 g/L, or an antithrombin III level less
than 70 percent of normal, although there is no evidence that it is beneficial [ 10]. Alternatively, high-risk patients
can be treated with low-dose aspirin or dipyridamole, although there are no controlled trials that demonstrate their
efficacy in thrombus prevention in children with nephrotic syndrome (NS).
Thiazide diuretic − Thiazide diuretics, such as metolazone (2 mg/kg per dose), in combination with
furosemide, appear to enhance the natriuretic and diuretic effects of furosemide alone [5]. However, this
combination of diuretics is associated with hypokalemia.
Amiloride − Amiloride is a potassium-sparing diuretic that decreases sodium channel activity of the cortical
collecting tubule. The rationale for its use is that renal sodium retention is at least in part related to an
activation of the epithelial sodium channel, which is abolished by amiloride [6,7]. It can be used in
combination with furosemide to decrease the risk of hypokalemia.
![Page 3: Symptomatic Management of Nephrotic Syndrome in Children](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100514/5695cf6f1a28ab9b028e1231/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
7/23/2019 Symptomatic Management of Nephrotic Syndrome in Children
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/symptomatic-management-of-nephrotic-syndrome-in-children 3/6
14/10/2015 Symptomatic management of nephrotic syndrome in children
http://www.uptodate.com/contents/symptomatic-m anagement-of-nephrotic-syndrome-in-chil dren?topicKey=PEDS%2F6113&elapsedTimeMs=13&source=sea…
Treatment of venous thromboembolism — Anticoagulation is most often initiated with low molecular weight
heparin, such as enoxaparin, at a starting dose of 1 mg/kg given every 12 hours. It can be given subcutaneously
(avoiding the need for central venous catheterization), and its pharmacokinetic profile is more predictable than
unfractionated heparin. Antifactor Xa assay is used for therapeutic drug monitoring. In situations where short half-
life and reversible anticoagulation is necessary, unfractionated heparin is utilized. The heparin dose necessary to
obtain a therapeutic effect is often greater than normal due to decreased antithrombin III level. Thrombolysis is
reserved only for severe cases. In patients with previous thromboembolic complications, we will start treatment
anticoagulation therapy if the patient remains nephrotic, which places them at continued risk for thrombosis. (See
"Renal vein thrombosis and hypercoagulable state in nephrotic syndrome", section on 'Anticoagulation for athromboembolic event'.)
INFECTION
Bacterial — Nephrotic children are at increased risk of developing infection (eg, peritonitis, pneumonia, and
sepsis) due to encapsulated bacteria, in part due to reduced serum concentrations of immunoglobulin, decreased
cellular immunity, and the administration of immunosuppressive therapy. The most common agent is
streptococcus pneumoniae followed by Escherichia coli. (See "Complications of nephrotic syndrome in children",
section on 'Bacterial infection'.)
Prophylactic antimicrobials are not recommended, but infections that do occur should be promptly treated.
Although antibody response can be blunted, all children with nephrotic syndrome (NS) should receive 23-valentpolysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) pneumococcal vaccine (if not already immunized). Although immunization is
ideally administered when the child is in remission and off of daily corticosteroid therapy, children who received
immunization at the onset of their NS while on high-dose daily prednisone responded with a 10-fold increase in
antibody levels to PPSV23 [12]. As a result, in children with idiopathic NS and who are steroid dependent resulting
in a high risk for pneumococcal disease, administration of PPSV23 should be considered. (See "Pneumococcal
(Streptococcus pneumoniae) polysaccharide vaccines in children", section on 'Indications'.)
Varicella — Children with NS who require immunosuppressive therapy are at increased risk for developing
varicella. Varicella vaccination has been shown to be effective in children with NS, and should be given to all
patients with negative varicella titers [13]. It is ideally administered as a two-dose regimen when the child is in
remission and on low-dose alternative days or off of corticosteroid therapy.
In cases of exposure of patients who are receiving immunosuppressive therapy and do not have immunity to
varicella, VariZIG, a varicella zoster immune globulin product, can be administered. VariZIG should be
administered within 96 hours of the exposure at a recommended dose of 125 units/10 kg body weight, up to a
maximum of 625 units (five vials); the minimum dose is 125 units. Patients should be monitored for varicella for 28
days after exposure, since VariZIG may prolong the incubation period. Any patient who receives VariZIG should
receive varicella vaccine. Vaccine should be given five months after administration of VariZIG.
Acyclovir , a synthetic nucleoside analog that inhibits replication of human herpes viruses, is effective therapy for
primary varicella infection. It should be instituted promptly in any patient who is receiving immunosuppressive
therapy and exhibits any sign of varicella infection. Acyclovir has also been used prophylactically in children
exposed to varicella while receiving immunosuppressive therapy [14]. (See "Vaccination for the prevention of
varicella-zoster virus infection: Chickenpox".)
OTHER DIETARY MEASURES
Caloric intake — Increased caloric consumption as a result of appetite stimulation of corticosteroid therapy can
lead to excessive weight gain. Dietary measures that limit excessive caloric consumption, including a low-fat diet,
will help children avoid large weight gains.
Calcium and vitamin D — Abnormalities in bone histology can be seen in patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS),
primarily due to two processes:
![Page 4: Symptomatic Management of Nephrotic Syndrome in Children](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100514/5695cf6f1a28ab9b028e1231/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
7/23/2019 Symptomatic Management of Nephrotic Syndrome in Children
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/symptomatic-management-of-nephrotic-syndrome-in-children 4/6
14/10/2015 Symptomatic management of nephrotic syndrome in children
http://www.uptodate.com/contents/symptomatic-m anagement-of-nephrotic-syndrome-in-chil dren?topicKey=PEDS%2F6113&elapsedTimeMs=13&source=sea…
Based on the above, calcium (500 mg/day) and vitamin D (2000 to 4000 units) supplements often are prescribed
especially when there are documented low calcium and/or vitamin D concentrations; however, there are currentlyno data that have shown this intervention to be effective.
HYPERLIPIDEMIA — Persistent hyperlipidemia is a risk factor for atherosclerosis and may play a role in the
progression of chronic renal failure. The lipid abnormalities induced by the nephrotic syndrome (NS) reverse with
remission.
The optimal treatment of hyperlipidemia in children with persistent NS is unknown. In children with NS, statin
therapy based on limited short-term observational data is effective and safe in reducing total and LDL cholesterol,
and triglyceride levels [19]. Nevertheless, statins should be used with caution until controlled studies are
performed [19].
Data from adults with persistent proteinuria demonstrate the following:
Based on the above evidence as well as data on the benefit of statin therapy in children with familial
hypercholesterolemia, we treat children who remain persistently nephrotic and have hyperlipidemia with statin
therapy. (See "Inherited disorders of LDL-cholesterol metabolism", section on 'Familial hypercholesterolemia' and
"Dyslipidemia in children: Management" and "Dyslipidemia in children: Management", section on 'Rationale andcriteria for pharmacologic therapy'.)
LDL apheresis with steroid therapy has been proposed in patients with hyperlipidemia and refractory nephrotic
syndrome. In one study involving 11 children, this treatment resulted in complete remission in five and partial
remission in two patients [22].
A more complete discussion on the treatment of hyperlipidemia in adults with NS is found separately. (See "Lipid
abnormalities in nephrotic syndrome", section on 'Treatment' .)
HYPERTENSION AND ACE INHIBITORS — Children with nephrotic syndrome (NS) and persistent
hypertension are more likely to have chronic kidney disease with poor outcome. As a result, in patients with
hypertension, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are the
preferred anti-hypertensive agents because of their potential additive antiproteinuric benefit and ability to slow
progression of renal impairment. The maximal antiproteinuric effect is observed after four weeks [23]; the
antiproteinuric effect can be increased by low salt diet and/or diuretics [ 24]. ACE inhibitors and ARBs should be
terminated if hyperkalemia cannot be controlled or the plasma creatinine concentration increases more than 30
percent above the baseline value. (See "Antihypertensive therapy and progression of nondiabetic chronic kidney
disease in adults".)
Other antihypertensive agents that have been used in children with NS include beta-blockers and calcium channel
blockers. (See "Treatment of hypertension in children and adolescents", section on 'Pharmacologic therapy'.)
Loss of vitamin D binding protein − In children with NS, urinary loss of vitamin D binding protein may result
in low ionized calcium and 25-OH Vitamin D3 (25-hydroxycholecalciferol) concentrations [15].
Prolonged corticosteroid therapy may lead to abnormalities in bone histology [16] and, subsequently,
osteoporosis [17]. However, one study using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry did not find any difference in
spinal or whole body mineral content of glucocorticoid-treated children with NS compared with control
patients [18]. (See "Prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis".)
Dietary modification has been shown to have little benefit.
The most successful hypolipidemic agents with persistent NS are the statins [ 20,21]. These agents generally
produce few side effects and can lower the plasma total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol
concentrations by 20 to 45 percent. There is a smaller reduction in triglyceride levels. (See "Lipid
abnormalities in nephrotic syndrome", section on 'Statins'.)
![Page 5: Symptomatic Management of Nephrotic Syndrome in Children](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100514/5695cf6f1a28ab9b028e1231/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
7/23/2019 Symptomatic Management of Nephrotic Syndrome in Children
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/symptomatic-management-of-nephrotic-syndrome-in-children 5/6
14/10/2015 Symptomatic management of nephrotic syndrome in children
http://www.uptodate.com/contents/symptomatic-m anagement-of-nephrotic-syndrome-in-chil dren?topicKey=PEDS%2F6113&elapsedTimeMs=13&source=sea…
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS — The majority of children with nephrotic syndrome (NS) will respond
to steroid therapy. However, symptomatic management is important in the early course of therapy, as response to
steroid therapy may take several weeks, and it is the mainstay of therapy in children who fail to respond to
steroids. (See "Treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children".)
Symptomatic management includes the following:
Use of UpToDate is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement.
REFERENCES
1. Hogg RJ, Portman RJ, Milliner D, et al. Evaluation and management of proteinuria and nephrotic syndromein children: recommendations from a pediatric nephrology panel established at the National KidneyFoundation conference on proteinuria, albuminuria, risk, assessment, detection, and elimination (PARADE).Pediatrics 2000; 105:1242.
2. Sullivan MJ 3rd, Hough DR, Agodoa LC. Peripheral arterial thrombosis due to the nephrotic syndrome: theclinical spectrum. South Med J 1983; 76:1011.
3. Yamauchi H, Hopper J Jr. Hypovolemic shock and hypotension as a complication in the nephroticsyndrome. Report of ten cases. Ann Intern Med 1964; 60:242.
4. Kapur G, Valentini RP, Imam AA, Mattoo TK. Treatment of severe edema in children with nephroticsyndrome with diuretics alone--a prospective study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4:907.
5. Garin EH. A comparison of combinations of diuretics in nephrotic edema. Am J Dis Child 1987; 141:769.
6. Deschênes G, Wittner M, Stefano A, et al. Collecting duct is a site of sodium retention in PAN nephrosis: arationale for amiloride therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12:598.
7. Doucet A, Favre G, Deschênes G. Molecular mechanism of edema formation in nephrotic syndrome:therapeutic implications. Pediatr Nephrol 2007; 22:1983.
8. Haws RM, Baum M. Efficacy of albumin and diuretic therapy in children with nephrotic syndrome. Pediatrics1993; 91:1142.
In patients with persistent proteinuria, salt and fluid restriction, and diuretics (alone or in combination with
salt-pore albumin) are used to control edema. (See 'Edema' above.)
Preventive measures to avoid thromboembolic complication include mobilization, avoidance of
hemoconcentration resulting from hypovolemia, and early treatment of sepsis or volume depletion. We
suggest not using routine prophylactic anticoagulation therapy in children with NS (Grade 2C). (See
'Hypercoagulability' above and "Renal vein thrombosis and hypercoagulable state in nephrotic syndrome",
section on 'Prophylactic anticoagulation'.)
Children with NS are at increased risk for both bacterial and viral infections. We recommend that these
children receive 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) pneumococcal, and varicella vaccines (Grade
1B). (See 'Infection' above.)
The optimal treatment of hyperlipidemia in children with persistent NS is unknown. Based upon data from
adults with NS and hyperlipidemia, we suggest administering statin therapy to children who remainpersistently nephrotic and have hyperlipidemia (Grade 2B). (See 'Hyperlipidemia' above and "Lipid
abnormalities in nephrotic syndrome", section on 'Treatment'.)
Children with NS and persistent hypertension are more likely to have chronic kidney disease with poor
outcome. In these patients, we suggest angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II
receptor blockers (ARBs) be used to treat their hypertension because of their potential additive antiproteinuric
benefit and ability to slow progression of renal impairment (Grade 2B). (See 'Hypertension and ACE
inhibitors' above and "Antihypertensive therapy and progression of nondiabetic chronic kidney disease in
adults".)
![Page 6: Symptomatic Management of Nephrotic Syndrome in Children](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100514/5695cf6f1a28ab9b028e1231/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
7/23/2019 Symptomatic Management of Nephrotic Syndrome in Children
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/symptomatic-management-of-nephrotic-syndrome-in-children 6/6
14/10/2015 Symptomatic management of nephrotic syndrome in children
http://www.uptodate.com/contents/symptomatic-m anagement-of-nephrotic-syndrome-in-chil dren?topicKey=PEDS%2F6113&elapsedTimeMs=13&source=sea…
Disclosures: Patrick Niaudet, MD Nothing to disclose. Tej K Mattoo, MD, DCH, FRCP Nothing to disclose. Melanie S Kim, MD
Nothing to disclose.
Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are addressed by vetting through a
multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referencedcontent is required of all authors and must conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.
Conflict of interest policy
9. Welch TR, Gianis J, Sheldon CA. Perforation of the scrotum complicating nephrotic syndrome. J Pediatr 1988; 113:336.
10. Kerlin BA, Haworth K, Smoyer WE. Venous thromboembolism in pediatric nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol 2014; 29:989.
11. Kerlin BA, Ayoob R, Smoyer WE. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of nephrotic syndrome-associatedthromboembolic disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 7:513.
12. Ulinski T, Leroy S, Dubrel M, et al. High serological response to pneumococcal vaccine in nephrotic childrenat disease onset on high-dose prednisone. Pediatr Nephrol 2008; 23:1107.
13. Furth SL, Arbus GS, Hogg R, et al. Varicella vaccination in children with nephrotic syndrome: a report of theSouthwest Pediatric Nephrology Study Group. J Pediatr 2003; 142:145.
14. Goldstein SL, Somers MJ, Lande MB, et al. Acyclovir prophylaxis of varicella in children with renal diseasereceiving steroids. Pediatr Nephrol 2000; 14:305.
15. Weng FL, Shults J, Herskovitz RM, et al. Vitamin D insufficiency in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome inremission. Pediatr Nephrol 2005; 20:56.
16. Freundlich M, Jofe M, Goodman WG, Salusky IB. Bone histology in steroid-treated children with non-azotemic nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol 2004; 19:400.
17. Gulati S, Godbole M, Singh U, et al. Are children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome at risk for metabolicbone disease? Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 41:1163.
18. Leonard MB, Feldman HI, Shults J, et al. Long-term, high-dose glucocorticoids and bone mineral content in
childhood glucocorticoid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:868.
19. Prescott WA Jr, Streetman DA, Streetman DS. The potential role of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors inpediatric nephrotic syndrome. Ann Pharmacother 2004; 38:2105.
20. Coleman JE, Watson AR. Hyperlipidaemia, diet and simvastatin therapy in steroid-resistant nephroticsyndrome of childhood. Pediatr Nephrol 1996; 10:171.
21. Sanjad SA, al-Abbad A, al-Shorafa S. Management of hyperlipidemia in children with refractory nephroticsyndrome: the effect of statin therapy. J Pediatr 1997; 130:470.
22. Hattori M, Chikamoto H, Akioka Y, et al. A combined low-density lipoprotein apheresis and prednisonetherapy for steroid-resistant primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in children. Am J Kidney Dis 2003;42:1121.
23. Gansevoort RT, de Zeeuw D, de Jong PE. Dissociation between the course of the hemodynamic andantiproteinuric effects of angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibition. Kidney Int 1993; 44:579.
24. Heeg JE, de Jong PE, van der Hem GK, de Zeeuw D. Efficacy and variability of the antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibition by lisinopril. Kidney Int 1989; 36:272.
Topic 6113 Version 12.0
Disclosures