Sylvia Hurtado, Ph.D. Marcela Cuellar Chelsea Guillermo-Wann Paolo Velasco
-
Upload
eliana-richmond -
Category
Documents
-
view
36 -
download
6
description
Transcript of Sylvia Hurtado, Ph.D. Marcela Cuellar Chelsea Guillermo-Wann Paolo Velasco
Empirically Defining Validation, Sense of Belonging, and Navigational Actions for
Students in Diverse Institutions: The Diverse Learning Environments Survey
Sylvia Hurtado, Ph.D.Marcela Cuellar
Chelsea Guillermo-WannPaolo Velasco
May 31, 2010Association for Institutional ResearchChicago, IL
A project funded by the Ford Foundation
Empirically examine innovative and established constructs in the Diverse Learning Environments pilot survey (DLE)◦General validation◦Validation by faculty in the Classroom◦Sense of belonging◦Navigational action
Goal: Establish constructs that can be used to empirically examine relationships with student outcomes
Purpose
Assist educators in advancing the success of diverse students
Assess undergraduate skills for work and citizenship in a pluralistic democracy
Create the conditions for realizing the benefits of diversity in the learning process
Increase retention rates and improve the assessment of retention
Research Project Purpose & Goals
Research:• Diverse Learning Environments Survey• Campus Case Studies of 8 Institutions• National Retention Study (Clearinghouse)
Practice:• Institute for the Critical Analysis of
Quantitative Data (July 13 – 15)• Diversity Research Institute (August 4 – 6)
Project Components
Review of the Literature
Sense of Belonging Validation Navigational Action &
Capital
Comprises cognitive and affective elements◦Cognitive level: information about experiences
with a group as a whole and other group members
◦Affective level: feelings that reflect the individual’s appraisal of their experiences with the group
(Bollen & Hoyle, 1990)
Original factor items◦ I feel a sense of belonging to …◦ I feel that I am a member of the … community◦ I see myself as part of the … community
Sense of Belonging
Utilized in higher education research as a psychological sense of integration◦ Illustrates the interplay between the individual
and the institution (Hurtado & Carter, 1997)
Original Bollen & Hoyle (1990) items modified to include broader concepts of cohesion
DLE uses the original construct
Sense of Belonging
Factors Influencing Sense of Belonging ◦ Perceptions of the campus climate for both white
and students of color (Hurtado et al, 2007; Locks et al, 2008)
◦ Positive interactions with diverse peers (Locks et al, 2008)
Different college predictors for different racial/ethnic groups◦Course-related faculty interaction, co-curricular
involvement, and perceptions of supportive residential environments (Inkelas et al, 2007)
Sense of Belonging Impacts Persistence (Hausmann et al, 2007)
Sense of Belonging
Validation “Validation is an enabling, confirming and
supportive process initiated by in- and out-of-class agents that foster academic and interpersonal development” (Rendón, 1994)
Differs from earlier theories on student persistence and learning (most notably Astin’s Theory of Involvement)
Validation Examples of invalidation Forms of validation◦Academic validation◦ Interpersonal validation
Occurs both in- and out-of-class Never empirically examined at a national
level DLE includes measures of both general
validation from faculty and staff and validation in the classroom
Validation Qualitative research has examined
validation Effects of validation on student experiences◦ Feel capable of learning◦Experience a feeling of self worth ◦ Feel that they, and everything that they bring to
the college experience, are accepted and recognized as valuable.
◦ Lacking validation, students feel crippled, silenced, subordinate, and/or mistrusted.
Navigation is critical for increasing academic goal attainment (AAC&U, 2002)
◦Equip students with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions about appropriate routes for their academic goals (AAC&U, 2002)
◦Actions and requisite knowledge represent navigational capital (Yosso, 2005)
Students of color must develop academic resilience that enables them to navigate social institutions (Alva, 1991, Yosso, 2005; see Solorzano, Ceja & Yosso, 2000)
Navigational Action & Capital
Family & Community Support (Delgado Bernal, 2001; Solórzano &Villapando, 1998)
Peer & Faculty Support (Solórzano, Ceja, &Yosso, 2000; Solórzano & Delgado Bernal, 2001; Solórzano & Villapando, 1998)
Identifying Career Goals & Multiple Paths to It
Having a Mentor Joining an Ethnic Organization DLE items measure navigational actions
that demonstrate navigational capital at work◦ Includes individual and community agency for
students of color (Yosso, 2005)
Variables Related to Navigational Action & Capital
Integrated assessment of climate, diversity practice, and outcomes
Inclusive of diverse social identities
Modules targeting specific topics Longitudinal when linked with other student data (e.g. other CIRP surveys, registrar data, etc.)
Nationally available CIRP survey in Spring 2011
Diverse Learning Environments Pilot Survey
Core Survey Modules◦Classroom Climate◦Transition into the Major◦ Intergroup Relations◦Community College Students’ Transfer Pathway◦Transition Experiences for Transfer Students at
four-year Institutions
DLE Pilot Survey Components
Online administration between January – May 2010
14 institutions (9 represented in this analysis)◦1 - community college (Midwest)◦3 - four-year private institutions (West, Midwest,
East)◦5 - four-year public universities (West)
Target sample: cohorts of second year and third year students◦Some institutions chose to sample additional
cohorts
Data Collection
n = 3,306 undergraduate students Racial/ethnic demographics*◦Black – 6%◦Asian American/Asian/Pacific Islander – 19%◦ Latina/o – 19%◦White – 68%◦Native American – 6%◦Arab American/Arab – 2%◦Other – 2%
Student characteristics◦11% Frosh, 31% Soph, 32% Junior, 25% Senior
33% transfer and 9% re-entry students * Students could choose multiple categories
Sample
Structural Equation Modeling to conduct Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Partial correlations
Cross-tabulations
Data Analysis
Items Factor Loadings
I see myself as part of the campus community .91
I feel that I am a member of the campus community
.95
I feel a sense of belonging to my campus .81
Sense of Belonging (α = .92)
Model-Fit Results
χ² .000
df 0
NFI 1.000
Items Factor Loadings
Faculty empower me to learn here .50
At least one staff member has taken interest in my development
.88
Faculty believe in my potential to succeed academically
.76
Staff encourage me to get involved in campus activities
.49
Staff recognize my achievements .66
At least one faculty member has taken interest in my development
.89
General Validation (α = .86)
Model-Fit Results
χ² 458.7
df 9
CFI .93
Items Factor Loadings
Instructors were able to determine my level of understanding of course material
.76
Instructors provided me with feedback that helped judge my progress
.81
I feel like my contributions were valued in class .82
Instructors encouraged me to meet with them after or outside of class
.64
Instructors encouraged me to ask questions and participate in discussions
.72
I received recognition for my work .72
Classroom Validation (α = .88)
Model-Fit Results
χ² 390.23
df 9
CFI .94
Factor Sense of Belonging
General Validation
Validation in the Classroom
Sense of Belonging
--- .57** .37**
General Validation
.57** --- .59**
Validation in the Classroom
.37** .59** ---
Correlation between Factors
p < .01
Validation
Items Sense of Belonging
General
Class
Discussed career goals .06*** .08*** .04*
Attended professor’s office hours --- .06*** ---
Participated in study groups .05** --- ---
Creating a plan to achieve career goals .05** .04* .07***
Participated in faculty/mentor program --- .05** ---
Participated in the Ethnic or Cultural Center activities
.06*** .04* ---
Partial Correlations for Navigational Action
*** p < .001** p < .01
* p < .05
Validation
Items Sense of Belonging
General
Class
Upper class peers .08*** --- ---
Peers in your same year .08*** --- ---
Academic counselors --- -.08*** ---
Faculty .08*** .29*** .23***
Staff .09*** .09*** ---
Partial Correlations for Navigational Capital
*** p < .001** p < .01
* p < .05
How often have you sought support from the following to successfully complete college? (5 pt Likert scale: never, seldom, sometimes, often, very often)
Institutional Type Low Middle High
Community College
10% 69% 21%
Four-year public 18% 66% 16%
Four-year private 9% 68% 23%
General Validation Across Institutional Types
χ² = 62.85p < .001
Institutional Type Low Middle High
Community College
15% 61% 24%
Four-year public 20% 66% 14%
Four-year private 11% 70% 19%
Validation in the Classroom Across Institutional Types
χ² = 66.28p < .001
Empirically identified useful constructs of validation to capture student experience
Useful in revised conceptual models for retention and future research
Student navigational actions are related to validation and sense of belonging, empowering students to learn
Discussion
Seeking faculty support is key to increased general validation and within the classroom
Staff are often left out of frameworks, however, preliminary research indicates they are important
Frequent use of academic counselors appear to influence a lower sense of general validation
Peer networks are central to sense of belonging
Discussion
Final validation of these and other innovative DLE constructs
Develop studies examining relationships between these constructs and key student outcomes, e.g. retention
National launch of DLE survey through CIRP◦Spring 2011
Future Directions
Higher Education Research Institute http://www.heri.ucla.edu
Diverse Learning Environments Project Website: http://heri.ucla.edu/dle
Email: [email protected]: 310-267-5930
Contact Us