SWITZERLAND - European Food Safety Authority€¦ · Switzerland 2005 Report on trends and sources...

SWITZERLAND

The Report referred to in Article 9 of Directive 2003/99/EC

TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES ANDZOONOTIC AGENTS IN HUMANS, FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS ANDFEEDINGSTUFFS

including information on foodborne outbreaks andantimicrobial resistance in zoonotic agents

IN 2005

INFORMATION ON THE REPORTING AND MONITORING SYSTEM

Country: Switzerland

Reporting Year: 2005

Institutions and laboratories involved in reporting and monitoring:

Laboratoryname

Description Contribution

SFVO Swiss federal veterinary Office Swiss Zoonoses Report

Switzerland 2005 Report on trends and sources of zoonoses

Switzerland 2005

PREFACE

This report is submitted to the European Commission in accordance with Article 9 of CouncilDirective 2003/99/EC1. The information has also been forwarded to the European Food SafetyAuthority (EFSA).

The report contains information on trends and sources of zoonoses and zoonotic agents inSwitzerland during the year 2005. The information covers the occurrence of these diseases andagents in humans, animals, foodstuffs and in some cases also in feedingstuffs. In addition thereport includes data on antimicrobial resistance in some zoonotic agents and commensal bacteriaas well as information on epidemiological investigations of foodborne outbreaks. Complementarydata on susceptible animal populations in the country is also given.

The information given covers both zoonoses that are important for the public health in the wholeEuropean Community as well as zoonoses, which are relevant on the basis of the nationalepidemiological situation.

The report describes the monitoring systems in place and the prevention and control strategiesapplied in the country. For some zoonoses this monitoring is based on legal requirements laiddown by the Community Legislation, while for the other zoonoses national approaches areapplied.

The report presents the results of the examinations carried out in the reporting year. A nationalevaluation of the epidemiological situation, with special reference to trends and sources ofzoonotic infections, is given. Whenever possible, the relevance of findings in foodstuffs andanimals to zoonoses cases in humans is evaluated.

The information covered by this report is used in the annual Community Summary Report onzoonoses that is published each year by EFSA.

-1 Directive 2003/99/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2003 on the monitoring ofzoonoses and zoonotic agents, amending Decision 90/424/EEC and repealing Council Directive 92/117/EEC, OJ L325, 17.11.2003, p. 31


Switzerland 2005

LIST OF CONTENTS

1. ANIMAL POPULATIONS 12. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS 32.1. SALMONELLOSIS 42.1.1. General evaluation of the national situation 42.1.2. Salmonella in foodstuffs 52.1.3. Salmonella in animals 102.1.4. Salmonella in feedingstuffs 162.1.5. Salmonella serovars and phagetype distribution 162.1.6. Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella isolates 17

2.2. CAMPYLOBACTERIOSIS 192.2.1. General evaluation of the national situation 192.2.2. Campylobacter, thermophilic in foodstuffs 202.2.3. Campylobacter, thermophilic in animals 232.2.4. Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter, thermophilic isolates 25

2.3. LISTERIOSIS 272.3.1. General evaluation of the national situation 272.3.2. Listeria in foodstuffs 282.3.3. Listeria in animals 28

2.4. E. COLI INFECTIONS 302.4.1. General evaluation of the national situation 302.4.2. Escherichia coli, pathogenic in foodstuffs 302.4.3. Escherichia coli, pathogenic in animals 30

2.5. TUBERCULOSIS, MYCOBACTERIAL DISEASES 312.5.1. General evaluation of the national situation 312.5.2. Mycobacterium in animals 32

2.6. BRUCELLOSIS 342.6.1. General evaluation of the national situation 342.6.2. Brucella in foodstuffs 352.6.3. Brucella in animals 35

2.7. YERSINIOSIS 422.7.1. General evaluation of the national situation 422.7.2. Yersinia in foodstuffs 432.7.3. Yersinia in animals 43

2.8. TRICHINELLOSIS 452.8.1. General evaluation of the national situation 452.8.2. Trichinella in animals 46

2.9. ECHINOCOCCOSIS 492.9.1. General evaluation of the national situation 492.9.2. Echinococcus in animals 50

2.10. TOXOPLASMOSIS 522.10.1. General evaluation of the national situation 522.10.2. Toxoplasma in animals 53

2.11. RABIES 552.11.1. General evaluation of the national situation 55


Switzerland 2005

2.11.2. Lyssavirus (rabies) in animals 563. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC INDICATORS OF ANTIMICROBIALRESISTANCE

57

3.1. ESCHERICHIA COLI, NON-PATHOGENIC 583.1.1. General evaluation of the national situation 583.1.2. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic isolates 58

4. FOODBORNE OUTBREAKS 59


Switzerland 2005

1. ANIMAL POPULATIONS

The relevance of the findings on zoonoses and zoonotic agents has to be related to the size andnature of the animal population in the country.

A. Information on susceptible animal population

Sources of information:

Living animals and herds: Coordinated census of agriculture. Swiss federal office of agricultureand Swiss federal office of statistics.Slaughtered animals: Official meat inspection statistics (SFVO) and monthly agriculturalstatistics (Swiss Farmer's Federation)

Dates the figures relate to and the content of the figures:

Number of animals hold in farms in Switzerland at 5th of May 2005. Number of animals slaughtered in the year 2005.

Definitions used for different types of animals, herds, flocks and holdings as well asthe types covered by the information:

Herd and flock are used as equivalent. The indicated number of herds is identical to the numberof farms holding respective species. Agriculture census counts the number of farms. Farms withmore than one herd or more than one holding of a species are very rare in Switzerland.

National evaluation of the numbers of susceptible population and trends in thesefigures:

In the timeframe of the last ten years a declining amount of farms are holding cattle (-2% peryear), pigs or laying hens (-4% per year each) and broilers (-2,5% per year). In the same timecattle population declined by 1,5% per year whereas the population of pigs (+1,5% per year)and boilers (+2.8% per year) increased.

Geographical distribution and size distribution of the herds, flocks and holdings

Average size of the farms in 2005: 34 cattle (16 dairy cows). 125 pigs, 29 sheep, 11 goats, 181laying hens, 4200 broilers.


Switzerland 2005 1

Table Susceptible animal populations

* Only if different than current reporting yearAnimal species Category of animals Number of

herds orflocks

Number ofholdings

Livestocknumbers(liveanimals)

Number ofslaughteredanimals

Year* Year* Year* Year*Cattle (bovine animals) in total 45433 1552703 644309

Gallus gallus (fowl) breeding flocks, unspecified - in total 2358 126023

laying hens 15661 2829272broilers 1189 5028122 42047000

Goats in total 6736 73498 33201

Pigs in total 12537 1566298 2712779

Sheep in total 11204 441024 273084

Solipeds, domestic horses - in total 12769 66139 3836

Turkeys in total 336 132380


Switzerland 2005 2

2. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTICAGENTS

Zoonoses are diseases or infections, which are naturally transmissible directly or indirectlybetween animals and humans. Foodstuffs serve often as vehicles of zoonotic infections. Zoonoticagents cover viruses, bacteria, fungi, parasites or other biological entities that are likely to causezoonoses.


Switzerland 2005 3

2.1. SALMONELLOSIS

2.1.1. General evaluation of the national situation

A. General evaluation

History of the disease and/or infection in the country

The Swiss ordinance of epizootics covers salmonellosis in cows, goats and milk sheep (TSV,Article 222-227) and in particular Salmonella enteritidis infection in poultry (TSV, Article255-261). Both diseases fall into the category of animal diseases to be controlled and arenotifiable diseases.

National evaluation of the recent situation, the trends and sources of infection

The incidence of Salmonella Enteritidis infection in poultry (Breeding flocks and laying hensflocks) decreased in the period 1994 to 2005 from 38 to 8 infected flocks per year.

Recent actions taken to control the zoonoses

Baseline study on the prevalence of Salmonella in laying flocks of Gallus gallus referring to theregulation of the European Commission (EC) No. 2160/2003.


Switzerland 2005 4

2.1.2. Salmonella in foodstuffs

A. Salmonella spp. in broiler meat and products thereof

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

At slaughterhouse and cutting plant

The industry takes responsibility for the monitoring of fattening poultry andpoultry meat production in a system of self-auditing. Results of the Salmonellamonitoring of the largest poultry producers and abattoirs are available coveringmore than 90% of the production. The number of animals tested is substantiallyhigher than the number of samples shown in the table, because collectivesamples were often tested (pooling).

Frequency of the sampling


Sampling distributed evenly throughout the year

Type of specimen taken


Fresh meat

Methods of sampling (description of sampling techniques)


Part of broilers or part of parts of broilers (leg, breast, wing)

Definition of positive finding


Growth in microbiological culture and identification of Salmonella

Diagnostic/analytical methods used


Bacteriological method: Bacteriological culture according to the descriptions ofthe Swiss Food Manual 2005 (Chapter 56).

Control program/mechanisms

The control program/strategies in place

Imported poultry (2005: 37,198 tons of poultry) is monitored by the border veterinarian


Switzerland 2005 5

service and randomly tested for Campylobacter and Salmonella. To test for Salmonella,83 samples were taken in the year 2005.

Measures in case of the positive findings or single cases

No measures are taken

Notification system in place

Notifiable disease in animals according to Swiss ordinance of epizootics (TSV, Art. 5)

Results of the investigation

Of the samples tested, 37% came from France, 28% from Brazil, 16% from Italy, 12% fromHungary and 7% from Germany. Six consignments from Hungary and one each from France,Brazil and Italy tested positive for Salmonella spp., of which the serovars isolated were S.infantis (3), S. typhimurium (3), S. enteritidis (2) and S. newport (1).


After a steady decline in Salmonella prevalence in imported poultry over the past three years(2002: 16% in 83 tested samples; 2003: 11% in 111 tested samples; 2004: 5% in 173 testedsamples), Salmonella spp. were detected more than twice as frequently in 2005 compared withthe previous year.Prevalence of Salmonella in poultry meat from Swiss production is constantly low, as the rasultsof monitoring of the industry shows: 2003: 0.6% positive samples, 2004 1.4% positive samples,2005 0.5%positive samples.

Additional information

Swiss zoonoses report 2005. Swiss Federal Veterinary Office Magazine 3/06(http://www.bvet.admin.ch/news/magazin/index.html?lang=en)

B. Salmonella spp. in turkey meat and products thereof

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

At retail

A study was carried out to investigate Salmonella prevalence in turkey meat atretail trade. This study was done in collaboration with the Centre for Zoonoses,Bacterial Animal Diseases and Antibiotic Resistance (ZOBA) of the Universityof Berne and the cantonal laboratories of Aargau, Baselland, Geneva, Jura, St.Gallen, Ticino and Thurgau.


At retail

Other: twice a year


Switzerland 2005 6


At retail

Fresh meat


At retail

Raw turkey meat from 172 retail businesses were sampled. Refrigerateddomestic products (26%), refrigerated import products (46%) and frozen importproducts (28%) were sampled according to their market share. Sampling wascarried out among food distributors in 57 different communities in all regions ofSwitzerland, not more than one sample of the same product category being takenin each branch.


At retail



At retail

Other: Bacteriological culture according to the descriptions of the Swiss FoodManual 2005 (Chapter 56).


Switzerland 2005 7

Tab

le S

alm

on

ella

in p

ou

ltry

mea

t an

d p

rod

uct

s th

ereo

f

--

Source of information

Sampling unit

Sample weight

Units tested

Total units positive for Salmonella

S. Infantis

S. Enteritidis

S. Typhimurium

Salmonella spp., unspecified

S. Saintpaul

S. Agona

S. Newport

S. Blockley

S. Indiana

Mea

t fr

om

bro

ilers

(G

allu

sg

allu

s)

---

fres

h -S

urve

illan

ce

of Sal

mon

ella

in th

epo

ultr

yin

dust

ry(s

eeS

wis

sZ

oono

ses

Rep

ort

2005

;S

wis

sF

eder

alV

eter

inar

yO

ffice

Mag

azin

e3/

06)

Bat

ch25

g55

03

12

Mea

t fr

om

tu

rkey

--

-


Switzerland 2005 8

fres

h -S

wis

szo

onos

esre

port

2005

,B

VE

RM

agaz

in3,

200

6

sing

le25

g17

210

11

21

22

1


Switzerland 2005 9

2.1.3. Salmonella in animals

A. Salmonella spp. in Gallus gallus - breeding flocks for egg production andflocks of laying hens

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

Laying hens flocks

Baseline study on the prevalence of Salmonella in laying flocks of Gallus gallusreferring to the regulation of the European Commission (EC) No. 2160/2003.Laying hens are sampled at the end of their production period, within 9 weeksbefore depopulation; only one flock per holding with at least 1000 hens; in total260 holdings.Start of the study 1. of June 2005, during one year. Results will be available after completion of the study at 31. of May 2006.


Laying hens: Before slaughter at farm

9 weeks prior to slaughter



Socks/ boot swabs



7 pooled samples are taken in any holding: 5 pairs of boot swabs (1 pair = 1pool) and 2 dust samples, both from egg belts and from different places of thehouse (additional faecal samples instead of dust samples).

Case definition


A flock is considered positive, if the presence of Salmonella spp. is detected in atleast one of the samples.

Eggs at packing centre (flock based approach)

Vaccination is prohibited



Switzerland 2005 10


Bacteriological method: Detection method referring to the following literature: ALaboratory Manual for the Isolation and Identification of Avian Pathogens. 4thEdition 1998, American Association of Avian Pathologists, Chapter 2:Salmonellosis. Guidelines on Detection and Monitoring of Salmonella InfectedPoultry Flocks with Particular Reference to Salmonella Enteritidis. World HealthOrganization, Graz, Austria, 1994. Swiss Food Manual (SLMB) Anhang 3,Kapitel 56. OIE Manual of Standards 1992, Anhang 4: Salmonellosis: S.Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis.

Vaccination policy

Breeding flocks (separate elite, grand parent and parent flocks whennecessary)


Laying hens flocks





The Swiss ordinance of epizootics covers Salmonella enteritidis infection inpoultry (TSV, Article 255-261) as notifiable animal diseases to be controlled.Breeding poultry and laying hens in flocks comprising more than 50 birds aresubject to active surveillance and have to be tested for S. enteritidis. Procedureand intensity of control is equivalent to directive 92/117/EEC. During the raisingand laying periods, samples are taken at regular intervals. In breeding flocks (production of hatching eggs) three samples are taken duringthe raising phase and further samples then taken at periodic intervals during thelaying phase. During the raising phase, bacteriological tests are carried out onfaeces and dead birds.In a suspected case, bacteriological tests are carried out on additional samples. Inthe event of a definitive positive finding, a simple first-degree quarantine isimposed on the flock (Article 69 TSV): To prevent the disease from spreading,animal movements are prohibited. All direct contact between birds that aresubject to the quarantine and birds from other flocks is forbidden. Thequarantined flocks must not be changed either by moving animals to other flocksor by introducing animals from other flocks. The diseased flocks must beslaughtered or culled.Imported one-day chicks and hatching eggs are monitored for Salmonellaenteritidis. In 2005 about 2.4 million one-day chicks, about 100,000 young hensand about 9 million hatching eggs were imported. The one-day chicks were


Switzerland 2005 11

mostly fattening chicks (87%). The rest were layers (3%) and parent birds of thefattening type (6%) and laying type (4%). The largest proportion of importedanimals and also most hatching eggs (>90%) came from France. All tests for S.enteritidis in imported poultry were negative.

Laying hens flocks

The Swiss ordinance of epizootics covers Salmonella enteritidis infection inpoultry (TSV, Article 255-261) as notifiable animal disease to be controlled.Breeding poultry and laying hens in flocks comprising more than 50 birds aresubject to active surveillance and have to be tested for S. enteritidis. Procedureand intensity of control is equivalent to directive 92/117/EEC. During the raisingand laying periods, samples are taken at regular intervals. Measures in case ofthe positive findings or single cases. Samples from laying hens (production ofeggs for consumption) are taken every six months. During the laying phase,blood or eggs undergo regular serological testing for antibodies.In a suspected case, bacteriological tests are carried out on additional samples. Inthe event of a definitive positive finding, a simple first-degree quarantine isimposed on the flock (Article 69 TSV): To prevent the disease from spreading,animal movements are prohibited. All direct contact between birds that aresubject to the quarantine and birds from other flocks is forbidden. Thequarantined flocks must not be changed either by moving animals to other flocksor by introducing animals from other flocks. The diseased flocks must beslaughtered or culled.



In the event of a definitive positive finding, a simple first-degree quarantine is imposedon the flock (Article 69 TSV): To prevent the disease from spreading, animal movementsare prohibited. All direct contact between birds that are subject to the quarantine andbirds from other flocks is forbidden. The quarantined flocks must not be changed eitherby moving animals to other flocks or by introducing animals from other flocks. Thediseased flocks must be slaughtered or culled.

Laying hens flocks

In the event of a definitive positive finding, a simple first-degree quarantine is imposedon the flock (Article 69 TSV): To prevent the disease from spreading, animal movementsare prohibited. All direct contact between birds that are subject to the quarantine andbirds from other flocks is forbidden. The quarantined flocks must not be changed eitherby moving animals to other flocks or by introducing animals from other flocks. Thediseased flocks must be slaughtered or culled.


The Swiss ordinance of epizootics covers Salmonella enteritidis infection in poultry (TSV,Article 255-261) as notifiable animal disease.


Switzerland 2005 12


In 8 poultry flocks, the Salmonella Enteritidis infection was detected and the flocks were culled.


The incidence of Salmonella Enteritidis infection in poultry (Breeding flocks and laying hensflocks) decreased in the period 1994 to 2005 from 38 to 8 infected flocks per year.

B. Salmonella spp. in Gallus gallus - breeding flocks for meat productionand broiler flocks

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

Broiler flocks

The industry takes responsibility for the monitoring of fattening poultry andpoultry meat production in a system of self-auditing. Results of the Salmonellamonitoring of the largest poultry producers and abattoirs are available coveringmore than 90% of the production. The number of animals tested is substantiallyhigher than the number of samples shown in the table, because collectivesamples were often tested (pooling).


Broiler flocks: Before slaughter at farm


Broiler flocks: At slaughter (flock based approach)




Socks/ boot swabs


Other: neck skin / appenix



Pooling



Switzerland 2005 13

Pooling

Case definition







Other: Culture according to the descriptions of the Swiss Food Manual 2005(Chapter 56).


Other: Culture according to the descriptions of the Swiss Food Manual 2005(Chapter 56).

Vaccination policy

Broiler flocks



Percentage of positive samples is low (0.2% at farm level, 1.0% at slaughter). There is no needfor extended control measures.


Switzerland 2005 14

Table Salmonella in other poultry

- -

So

urc

e o

f in

form

atio

n

Sam

plin

g u

nit

Un

its

test

ed

To

tal u

nit

s p

osi

tive

fo

r S

alm

on

ella

S. I

nfa

nti

s

S. E

nte

riti

dis

S. T

yph

imu

riu

m

Sal

mo

nel

la s

pp

., u

nsp

ecif

ied

S. A

go

na

S. I

nd

ian

a

Gallus gallus (fowl) - - -

laying hens -

during production period - SwissZoonosesreport,BVETMagazin3, 2006.

flocks 1631 8 8

broilers - SwissZoonosesReport2005

FlocksandSlaughterBatches

1188 9 2 0 1 3 2 1

Footnote

Swiss Zoonoses Report 2005: Swiss Federal Veterinary Office Magazine 3/06.


Switzerland 2005 15

2.1.4. Salmonella in feedingstuffs


Switzerland 2005 16

2.1.5. Salmonella serovars and phagetype distribution


Switzerland 2005 17

2.1.6. Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella isolates

The methods of collecting, isolating and testing of the Salmonella isolates are described in thechapters above respectively for each animal species, foodstuffs and humans. The serotype andphagetype distributions can be used to investigate the sources of the Salmonella infections inhumans. Findings of same serovars and phagetypes in human cases and in foodstuffs or animalsmay indicate that the food category or animal species in question serves as a source of humaninfections. However as information is not available from all potential sources of infections,conclusions have to be drawn with caution.


Switzerland 2005 18

2.2. CAMPYLOBACTERIOSIS


A. Thermophilic Campylobacter General evaluation


Campylobacter infection in humans is today the main food-associated infection in Switzerlandand throughout the world. Campylobacter spp. are predominantly transmitted to humans via thealimentary tract, water and poultry being the primary sources. An important approach tocontrolling the rate of infection in humans is therefore to prevent the colonisation of broilerpoultry by Campylobacter, so that the pathogen does not even enter the abattoir and thus thefood chain.


Human as well as animal cases are notifiable.In 2005, 5259 cases of campylobacteriosis were reported in humans. At 70.9 reports per100,000 inhabitants, campylobacteriosis was reported more than two-and-a-half times moreoften than salmonellosis (25.3 reports per 100,000 inhabitants). Of the 5259 human isolatestested, 57% were C. jejuni, 4% were C. coli and 32% were C. jejuni or C. coli that were notfurther differentiated. Other Campylobacter species (7%) were of minor importance.As part of a research project on resistance to antibiotics, the SFVO studied the prevalence ofCampylobacter in 100 flocks of broiler poultry in 2002 to 2005 (cloacal swabs samples at theend of the slaughter line). The prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in poultry production thusremained unchanged in 2005 compared with previous years (2004: 26%; 2003: 25%), but wassignificantly lower than in 2002 (42%). At 36%, the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. among imported poultry in 2005 was within therange of previous years (2004: 22%, 2003: 40%).


Notifiable disease in animals according to Swiss ordinance of epizootics (TSV Art. 5)




Switzerland 2005 19

2.2.2. Campylobacter, thermophilic in foodstuffs

A. Thermophilic Campylobacter in Broiler meat and products thereof

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy


A study was carried out to investigate Campylobacter prevalence in turkey meatat retail trade. This study was in collaboration with the Centre for Zoonoses,Bacterial Animal Diseases and Antibiotic Resistance (ZOBA) of the Universityof Berne and the cantonal laboratories of Aargau, Baselland, Geneva, Jura, St.Gallen, Ticino and Thurgau.


At retail

2 times a year


At retail

Fresh meat


At retail

Raw turkey meat from 172 retail businesses were sampled. Refrigerateddomestic products (26%), refrigerated import products (46%) and frozen importproducts (28%) were sampled according to their market share. Sampling wascarried out among food distributors in 57 different communities in all regions ofSwitzerland, not more than one sample of the same product category being takenin each branch.


At retail

Bacterial growth and identification by interpretation of gram staining,oxidase-katalyse-tests and hippurat- and indoxylacetate-hydrolysis


At retail

Other: According to the descriptions of the Swiss Food Manual 2005 (Chapter56; Method E.22).


Switzerland 2005 20

Preventive measures in place

none



Imported poultry (2005: 37,198 tons of poultry) is controlled by the border veterinarianservice and randomly sampled for Campylobacter and Salmonella. To test forCampylobacter spp., 83 samples were taken in the year 2005.


No measures are taken.


Salmonellosis is a notifiable disease in animals according to Swiss ordinance of epizootics(TSV Art. 5)


Of the samples tested, 37% came from France, 28% from Brazil, 16% from Italy, 12% fromHungary and 7% from Germany. Thirty samples (36%) tested positive for Campylobacter spp.,half of the samples tested being identified as C. jejuni and almost a quarter (23%) as C. coli. Thepositive samples came from France (60%), Italy (23%), Hungary (10%) and Germany (7%). At36%, the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. among imported poultry in 2005 was within therange of previous years (2004: 22%, 2003: 40%).


At 36%, the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. among imported poultry in 2005 was within therange of previous years (2004: 22%, 2003: 40%).




Switzerland 2005 21

Table Campylobacter in poultry meat

- -

So

urc

e o

f in

form

atio

n

Sam

plin

g u

nit

Sam

ple

wei

gh

t

Un

its

test

ed

To

tal u

nit

s p

osi

tive

fo

r th

erm

op

hili

c C

amp

ylo

bac

ter

spp

.

C. c

oli

C. l

ari

C. j

eju

ni

C. u

psa

lien

sis

ther

mo

ph

ilic

Cam

pyl

ob

acte

r sp

p.,

un

spec

ifie

d

Meat from turkey -

fresh - Swisszoonosesreport2005.SwissFederalVeterinary

OfficeMagazine

3/06*

* (http://www.bvet.admin.ch/news/magazin/index.html?lang=en)

single 25 g 172 65 16 1 48

Switzerla Switzerland 2005 Report on trends and sources of zoonoses

Switzerla Switzerland 2005 22

2.2.3. Campylobacter, thermophilic in animals

A. Thermophilic Campylobacter in Gallus gallus

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

The analysis of Campylobacter prevalence in poultry is part of a national monitoringprogram for antimicrobial resistance in Swiss food-producing animals. The programfollows the EU Directive on the monitoring of zoonoses and zoonotic agents(2003/99/EC). In accordance with the proposal of the EU, a sample size was set toestimate the prevalence of resistante Isolates with a confidence of 10%, assuming thatabout 50% of the isolates show resistancy.These samples were used at the same time to estimate the herd prevance ofCampylobacter in broilers in 2005.


At slaughter

Once a year


At slaughter

Other: cloacal swabs


At slaughter

160 herds of broiler were randomly selected. From each herd, 2 specimens weresampled by collecting from each specimen 2 cloacal swabs (Bioswab Cary BlairMedium). The swabs were analysed at one single Lab for the presence ofCampylobacter spp..

Case definition

At slaughter

bacterial growth and identification by interpretation of gram staining,oxidase-katalyse-tests and hippurat- and Indoxylacetate-hydrolysis


At slaughter

Bacteriological method: Enrichment of bacteria during 24h at 43°C withCampylobacter Enrichment Broth (Biolife) and cultivation on Campylosel agarplates (bioMérieux, France)


Switzerland 2005 23

Vaccination policy

no vaccination available

Other preventive measures than vaccination in place

no immunoprophylactic methods allowed



Imported poultry (2005: 37,198 tons of poultry) is monitored by the border veterinarianservice and randomly tested for Campylobacter and Salmonella. To test forCampylobacter spp., 83 samples were taken.


mandatory notification; no measures are taken


Notifiable disease in animals according to Swiss Regulation of epizootics (TSV Art. 5)


Of the samples tested, 37% came from France, 28% from Brazil, 16% from Italy, 12% fromHungary and 7% from Germany. Thirty samples (36%) tested positive for Campylobacter spp.,half of the samples tested being identified as C. jejuni and almost a quarter (23%) as C. coli. Thepositive samples came from France (60%), Italy (23%), Hungary (10%) and Germany (7%). At36%, the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. among imported poultry in 2005 was within therange of previous years (2004: 22%, 2003: 40%).


At 36%, the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. among imported poultry in 2005 was within therange of previous years (2004: 22%, 2003: 40%).




Switzerland 2005 24

Table Campylobacter in animals

- -

So

urc

e o

f in

form

atio

n

Sam

plin

g u

nit

Un

its

test

ed

To

tal u

nit

s p

osi

tive

fo

r C

amp

ylo

bac

ter,

th

erm

op

hili

c

C. j

eju

ni

C. c

oli

C. l

ari

C. u

psa

lien

sis

ther

mo

ph

ilic

Cam

pyl

ob

acte

r sp

p.,

un

spec

ifie

d

Gallus gallus (fowl) - - -broilers - - -

- at slaughterhouse (1) - Monitoring

programm

for

antimicrobail

resistance

in broilers

single 596 137 82 46 9

(1) : cloacal swaps


Switzerland 2005 25

2.2.4. Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter, thermophilic isolates


Switzerland 2005 26

2.3. LISTERIOSIS


A. Listeriosis general evaluation


In comparison with Salmonella and Campylobacter, Listeria represent the highest risk for ahospitalization and the second highest risk for death due to a intoxication by food. A majorsource of infection are milk products and cheese. Approximately 30% of the diseased peopledie, whereof aborted foetus have a major part. The biggest epidemic outbreak in Switzerland was in the 80ies due to contaminated cheese of aparticular variety. The first cases of this outbreak were diagnosed in 1983. However, theepidemic pattern and the cause of the infection was a long time not identified because thedisease was not notifiable to that time. No more than in 1986 the contaminated cheese wasidentified as a source of infection. To that time 122 people diseased and 33 died.


Human as well as animal cases are notifiable.A total of 70 cases of Listeria monocytogenes were registered with the Federal Office of PublicHealth and the Centre National de Référence des Listerias (CNRL). This figure is higher than inthe last few years (30-40 human cases) and is due in part to an outbreak in Canton Neuchatel,where cheese contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes (serotyp 1/2a) was sold. Eight peoplewere hospitalized and thereof 3 people died.Cantonal veterinarians reported 20 cases of listeriosis in animals (10 in sheep, 5 in cattle, 5 ingoats), which is within the mean range over many years. The approved Swiss Veterinary Laboratories reported 98 diagnostic testings in dogs, cattle,sheep, goats and solipeds (see table)


Notifiable disease in animals according to Swiss ordinance of epizootics (TSV Art. 5)The cheese production plant contaminated with Listeria (see above) was closed, and the batch ofinfected cheese was retracted and disposed.




Switzerland 2005 27

2.3.2. Listeria in foodstuffs

2.3.3. Listeria in animals

Table Listeria spp. in animals

- -

So

urc

e o

f in

form

atio

n

Sam

plin

g u

nit

Un

its

test

ed

To

tal u

nit

s p

osi

tive

fo

r L

iste

ria

L. m

on

ocy

tog

enes

Lis

teri

a sp

p.,

un

spec

ifie

d

Cattle (bovine animals) (1) - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimal Healthin Switzerland(ITS)

animal 81 8 8

Sheep (2) - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimal Healthin Switzerland(ITS)

animal 10 7 7

Goats (3) - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimal Healthin Switzerland(ITS)

animal 4 3 3

Pigs (4) - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimal Healthin Switzerland(ITS)

animal 0

Solipeds, domestic - - -

horses (5) - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimal Healthin Switzerland(ITS)

animal 2 0 0

Dogs - - -

pet animals (6) - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimal Healthin Switzerland(ITS)

animal 1 0 0

(1) : antigen detection (Immunohistochemistry, histology or culture)(2) : antigen detection (Immunohistochemistry, histology or culture)(3) : antigen detection (Immunohistochemistry, histology or culture)(4) : antigen detection (Immunohistochemistry, histology or culture)(5) : antigen detection (Immunohistochemistry, histology or culture)(6) : antigen detection (Immunohistochemistry, histology or culture)


Switzerland 2005 28

Footnote

testing for agents.


Switzerland 2005 29

2.4. E. COLI INFECTIONS


2.4.2. Escherichia coli, pathogenic in foodstuffs

2.4.3. Escherichia coli, pathogenic in animals


Switzerland 2005 30

2.5. TUBERCULOSIS, MYCOBACTERIAL DISEASES


A. Tuberculosis General evaluation


Switzerland is officially acknowledged as free from bovine tuberculosis since 1959. Freedom from disease has been proven in 1997 conducting a survey in a randomized sample of4874 farms. 111'394 cattle (whole holdings older than 6 months) were tuberculin tested. In 72farms tests had to be repeated. All farms were negative.Vaccination is prohibited. Requirements of section 3.2.3.10 of the OIE International AnimalHealth Code are fulfilled since 1959. Free status is recognised by EU (Bilateral Agreement onAgriculture, Veterinary Annex).


There are no observations that would challenge the freedom of Swiss cattle from tuberculosis.


Switzerland 2005 31

2.5.2. Mycobacterium in animals

A. Mycobacterium bovis in Bovine Animals

Status as officially free of bovine tuberculosis during the reporting year

The entire country free

Switzerland is officially acknowledged as free from bovine tuberculosis since 1959.Freedom from disease has been proven in 1997 conducting a survey in a randomizedsample of 4874 farms. 111'394 cattle (whole holdings older than 6 months) weretuberculin tested. In 72 farms tests had to be repeated. All farms were negative.



Bovine tuberculosis is regulated as a zoonoses to be eradicated (Swiss ordinance ofepizootics, TSV Art. 158 - Art. 165). Notification of suspicious cases is mandatory.Actions to be taken in suspicious farms are ban of all animal traffic, investigation of thewhole herd. Official meat inspection is investigating each carcass, its organs and lymphatic tissue onthe prevalence of abnormal alterations. Carcasses showing clinical signs of tuberculosishave to be destroyed.


In confirmed cases (herds) all diseased or suspicious cattle has to be slaughtered and the milk ofthem is disposed. The barn has to be disinfected.


Bovine tuberculosis is notifiable since 1950.


There are no observations that would challenge the freedom of Swiss cattle population fromtuberculosis.


Switzerland 2005 32

Tab

le B

ovi

ne

tub

ercu

losi

s in

co

un

trie

s an

d r

egio

ns

that

do

no

t re

ceiv

e C

om

mu

nit

y co

-fin

anci

ng

fo

r er

adic

atio

np

rog

ram

me

Reg

ion

T

ota

l nu

mb

er o

fex

isti

ng

bo

vin

e O

ffic

ially

fre

eh

erd

s In

fect

ed h

erd

s R

ou

tin

e tu

ber

culin

test

ing

N

um

ber

of

tub

ercu

lin t

ests

carr

ied

ou

t b

efo

reth

e in

tro

du

ctio

n

Nu

mb

er o

f an

imal

sw

ith

su

spic

iou

sle

sio

ns

of

tub

ercu

losi

s

Nu

mb

er o

f an

imal

sd

etec

ted

po

siti

vein

bac

teri

olo

gic

alex

amin

atio

n

Her

ds

An

imal

s N

um

ber

of

her

ds

%

Nu

mb

ero

f h

erd

s %

In

terv

alb

etw

een

rou

tin

etu

ber

culin

test

s

Nu

mb

ero

fan

imal

ste

sted

into

th

e h

erd

s(A

nn

ex A

(I)(

2)(c

)th

ird

ind

ent

(1)

of

Dir

ecti

ve64

/432

/EE

C)

exam

ined

an

dsu

bm

itte

d t

oh

isto

pat

ho

log

ical

and

bac

teri

olo

gic

alex

amin

atio

ns

Sch

wei

z/S

uiss

e/S

vizz

era

4543

3 15

5270

3 45

433

100

0 0

1113

94

2 0

Tot

al45

433

1552

703

4543

3 10

0 0

0 0

1113

94

0 2

0

Foo

tnot

e

The

fir

st a

nd u

ntil

now

late

st s

urve

y to

ok p

lace

in 1

997.

All

anim

als

test

ed w

ere

Tub

ercu

losi

s ne

gativ

.T

he n

umbe

r of

ani

mal

s w

ith s

uspi

ciou

s le

sion

s (n

=2)

are

dat

e fr

om th

e ye

ar 2

005.

Non

e of

thos

e sp

ecim

ens

wer

e te

stes

bac

teri

olog

ical

ly p

ositi

ve f

or T

B.


Switzerland 2005 33

2.6. BRUCELLOSIS


A. Brucellosis General evaluation


Switzerland is officially acknowledged as free from bovine brucellosis since 1959. Bovinebrucellosis is notifiable since 1956. Vaccination is prohibited since 1961. Requirements ofsection 3.2.1.5 of the OIE International Animal Health Code are fulfilled since 1963. Free statusis recognised by EU (Bilateral Agreement on Agriculture, Veterinary Annex). National Surveyin 1997.Switzerland's sheep and goat population is officially acknowledged as brucellosis free. Freestatus is recognized by EU (Bilateral Agreement on Agriculture, Veterinary Annex). NationalSurveys are carried out since 1998.


There are no observations that would challenge the freedom of Swiss cattle population frombrucellosis. There are no observations that would challenge the freedom of Swiss sheep and goatpopulation from brucellosis.


National surveys on a yearly basis are carried out to document freedom from brucellosis insheep and goat since 1998.


Switzerland 2005 34

2.6.2. Brucella in foodstuffs

2.6.3. Brucella in animals

A. Brucella abortus in Bovine Animals

Status as officially free of bovine brucellosis during the reporting year


Switzerland is officially acknowledged as free from bovine brucellosis since 1959.Bovine brucellosis is notifiable since 1956. Vaccination is prohibited since 1961.Requirements of section 3.2.1.5 of the OIE International Animal Health Code are fulfilledsince 1963. Free status is recognised by EU (Bilateral Agreement on Agriculture,Veterinary Annex). Freedom from disease has been proved in 1997 conducting a survey in a randomizedsample of 4874 farms. 31'042 blood samples and 18'952 milk samples from a total of49'994 cows (in general older than 24 months) were tested using serological test. Therewere no positive findings in these samples.



Brucellosis in bovine animals is regulated as zoonoses to be eradicated (Swiss ordinanceof epizootics, TSV Art. 150 - Art. 157). Notification of suspicious cases is mandatory.Actions to be taken in suspicious farms are ban of all animal traffic, investigation of thewhole herd and of the placenta of calving cows.Official meat inspection is investigating each carcass, its organs and lymphatic tissue onthe prevalence of abnormal alterations. Carcasses showing clinical signs of brucellosishave to be destroyed.


In confirmed cases (herds) all diseased cattle has to be killed. All placentas, abortion materialand the milk of diseased and suspicious cows has to be disposed. The barn has to be disinfected.


Notification of suspicious cases and outbreaks is mandatory since 1956.


There are no observations that would challenge the freedom of Swiss cattle population frombrucellosis.

B. Brucella melitensis in Sheep

Status as officially free of ovine brucellosis during the reporting year


Switzerland 2005 35


Freedom from disease has been proved every year since 1998 conducting a survey in arandomized sample of farms. Free status is recognized by EU (Bilateral Agreement onAgriculture, Veterinary Annex).



Brucellosis in sheep and goats is regulated as zoonoses to be eradicated (Swiss ordinanceof epizootics, TSV Art. 190 - Art. 195). Notification of suspicious cases is mandatory.Actions to be taken in suspicious farms are ban of all animal traffic and the investigationof the whole herd.Official meat inspection is investigating each carcass, its organs and lymphatic tissue onthe prevalence of abnormal alterations. Carcasses showing clinical signs of brucellosishave to be destroyed and farms of origin are investigated.Freedom from disease has been documented every year since 1998 conducting a surveyin a randomized sample of farms. In 2005 673 farms with sheep and 592 farms with goatswere included in the survey. 9'488 samples from sheep and 4'299 samples from goatswere tested using serological test. There were no positive findings in these samples. EUregulation 91/68/EEC that defines populations of sheep and goat as one epidemiologicalunit is the basis of the survey. Scientific basis is published by Hadorn et al. 2002:Risk-based design of repeated surveys for the documentation of freedom from non-highlycontagious diseases. Preventive Veterinary Medicine (2002) 56: 179-192.


In confirmed cases (herds) the whole herd has to be killed immediately. All placentas, abortionmaterial and the milk of diseased and suspicious animals have to be disposed. The barn has tobe disinfected.




There are no observations that would challenge the freedom of Swiss goat population frombrucellosis.

C. Brucella melitensis in Goat

Status as officially free of caprine brucellosis during the reporting year


Freedom from disease has been proved every year since 1998 conducting a survey in arandomized sample of farms. Free status is recognized by EU (Bilateral Agreement onAgriculture, Veterinary Annex).


Switzerland 2005 36



Brucellosis in sheep and goats is regulated as zoonoses to be eradicated (Swiss ordinanceof epizootics, TSV Art. 190 - Art. 195). Notification of suspicious cases is mandatory.Actions to be taken in suspicious farms are ban of all animal traffic and the investigationof the whole herd.Official meat inspection is investigating each carcass, its organs and lymphatic tissue onthe prevalence of abnormal alterations. Carcasses showing clinical signs of brucellosishave to be destroyed and farms of origin are investigated.Freedom from disease has been documented every year since 1998 conducting a surveyin a randomized sample of farms. In 2005 a randomized sample of 673 farms with sheepand 592 farms with goats were included in the survey. 9'488 samples from sheep and4'299 samples from goats were tested using serological test. There were no positivefindings in these samples. EU regulation 91/68/EEC that defines populations of sheep andgoat as one epidemiological unit is the basis of the survey. Scientific basis is published byHadorn et al. 2002: Risk-based design of repeated surveys for the documentation offreedom from non-highly contagious diseases. Preventive Veterinary Medicine (2002) 56:179-192.


In confirmed cases (herds) the whole herd has to be killed immediately. All placentas, abortionmaterial and the milk of diseased and suspicious animals have to be disposed. The barn has tobe disinfected.




There are no observations that would challenge the freedom of Swiss goat population frombrucellosis.


Switzerland 2005 37

Table Brucellosis in other animals

- -

So

urc

e o

f in

form

atio

n

Sam

plin

g u

nit

Un

its

test

ed

To

tal u

nit

s p

osi

tive

fo

r B

ruce

lla

B. m

elit

ensi

s

B. a

bo

rtu

s

B. s

uis

Bru

cella

sp

p.,

un

spec

ifie

d

Pigs (1) - Databaseoflaboratoryresultsfrom theSwissapprovedCeterinarydiagnosticLaboratories(ITS)

Animals 48 0 0

mixed herds - - -unspecified (3) - Database

oflaboratoryresultsfrom theSwissapprovedCeterinarydiagnosticLaboratories(ITS)

Animals 532 3 3

Wild boars (4) - Databaseoflaboratoryresultsfrom theSwissapprovedCeterinarydiagnosticLaboratories(ITS)

Animals 6 0 0

wild (2) - atabase oflaboratoryresultsfrom theSwissapprovedCeterinarydiagnosticLaboratories(ITS)

Animals 3 0 0

(1) : Diagnostic analyses by cultural methods(2) : Diagnostic analyses by cultural methods(3) : Serological Data(4) : Serological Data

Footnote


Switzerland 2005 38

Diagnostic analyses startified by cultural methods or serological data. Please note the comments of each line


Switzerland 2005 39

Tab

le B

ovi

ne

bru

cello

sis

in c

ou

ntr

ies

and

reg

ion

s th

at d

o n

ot

rece

ive

Co

mm

un

ity

co-f

inan

cin

g f

or

erad

icat

ion

pro

gra

mm

e

Reg

ion

T

ota

ln

um

ber

of

Off

icia

llyfr

ee h

erd

s In

fect

edh

erd

s S

urv

eilla

nce

In

vest

igat

ion

s o

f su

spec

t ca

ses

exis

tin

gb

ovi

ne

Ser

olo

gic

al t

ests

E

xam

inat

ion

of

bu

lk m

ilk s

amp

les

Info

rmat

ion

ab

ou

tab

ort

ion

s E

pid

emio

log

ical

inve

stig

atio

n

Her

ds

An

imal

s N

um

ber

of

her

ds

%

Nu

mb

er o

fh

erd

s %

N

um

ber

of

bo

vin

e N

um

ber

of

anim

als

Nu

mb

er o

fin

fect

ed

Nu

mb

er o

fb

ovi

ne

Nu

mb

er o

fan

imal

s N

um

ber

of

infe

cted

N

um

ber

of

no

tifi

ed

Nu

mb

er o

fis

ola

tio

ns

Nu

mb

er o

fab

ort

ion

s N

um

ber

of

anim

als

Nu

mb

er o

fsu

spen

ded

Nu

mb

er o

f p

osi

tive

anim

als

Nu

mb

er o

fan

imal

s N

um

ber

of

anim

als

her

ds

test

edte

sted

her

ds

test

edh

erd

ste

sted

or

po

ols

test

edh

erd

sab

ort

ion

sw

hat

ever

cau

se

of

Bru

cella

infe

ctio

nd

ue

toB

ruce

llaab

ort

us

test

ed w

ith

sero

log

ical

blo

od

tes

ts

her

ds

Ser

olo

gic

ally

BS

T

exam

ined

mic

rob

iolo

gic

ally

po

siti

vem

icro

bio

log

ical

ly

Who

le c

ount

ry

4543

3 15

5270

3 45

433

100

0 0

4874

31

042

0 48

74

0 18

952

Tot

al45

433

1552

703

4543

3 10

0 0

0 48

74

3104

2 0

4874

0

0 0

0 0

1895

2 0

0 0

0 0

Foo

tnot

e

Las

t sur

veill

ance

: 199

7


Switzerland 2005 40

Ovi

ne

or

Cap

rin

e B

ruce

llosi

s in

co

un

trie

s an

d r

egio

ns

that

do

no

t re

ceiv

e C

om

mu

nit

y co

-fin

anci

ng

fo

r er

adic

atio

np

rog

ram

me

Reg

ion

T

ota

l nu

mb

er o

fex

isti

ng

ovi

ne

/ca

pri

ne

Off

icia

lly f

ree

her

ds

Infe

cted

her

ds

Su

rvei

llan

ce

Inve

stig

atio

ns

of

susp

ect

case

s

Her

ds

An

imal

s N

um

ber

of

her

ds

%

Nu

mb

er o

fan

imal

s %

N

um

ber

of

her

ds

test

ed

Nu

mb

er o

fan

imal

s te

sted

N

um

ber

of

infe

cted

her

ds

Nu

mb

er o

fan

imal

s te

sted

wit

h s

ero

log

ical

blo

od

tes

ts

Nu

mb

er o

fan

imal

s p

osi

tive

sero

log

ical

ly

Nu

mb

er o

fan

imal

sex

amin

edm

icro

bio

log

ical

ly

Nu

mb

er o

fan

imal

s p

osi

tive

mic

rob

iolo

gic

ally

Nu

mb

er o

fsu

spen

ded

her

ds

Who

le c

ount

ry

1794

0 51

4522

17

940

100

0 0

1266

13

787

0

Tot

al17

940

5145

22

1794

0 10

0 0

0 12

66

1378

7 0

0 0

0 0

0

Foo

tnot

e

deta

ils o

f th

e su

rvei

llanc

e ar

e de

scri

bed

in a

rep

ort a

nd c

an b

e do

wnl

oade

d:ht

tp://

ww

w.b

vet.a

dmin

.ch/

tierg

esun

dhei

t/001

92/in

dex.

thm

l?la

ng=

de&

dow

nloa

d=04

237_

de.p

df


Switzerland 2005 41

2.7. YERSINIOSIS


A. Yersinia enterocolitica general evaluation


Yersiniosis (Y. enterocolitica, Y. pseudotuberculosis) in animal is notifiable, but not in humans. Cases of Yersinia in animals are reported in a database by the cantonal chief veterinarians.Approved Swiss veterinary Laboratories are linked with a laboratory database of the SwissFederal Veterinary Office. In 2005, three cases of yersiniosis were reported by cantonalveterinarians, one being in a monkey, one in a sheep and one in a mouse. In the diagnosticlaboratories, 254 samples were tested for yersiniosis, and four of these proved positive.






Switzerland 2005 42

2.7.2. Yersinia in foodstuffs

2.7.3. Yersinia in animals

Table Yersinia spp. in animals

- -

So

urc

e o

f in

form

atio

n

Sam

plin

g u

nit

Un

its

test

ed

To

tal u

nit

s p

osi

tive

fo

r Y

ersi

nia

Y. e

nte

roco

litic

a

Yer

sin

ia u

nsp

ecif

ied

Y. e

nte

roco

litic

a -

Y. e

nte

roco

litic

a O

:9

Y. e

nte

roco

litic

a -

Y. e

nte

roco

litic

a O

:3

Cattle (bovine animals) - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

single 5 0

Sheep - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

single 2 2

Goats - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

single 2 0

Pigs - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

single 81 0

Solipeds, domestic - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

single 3 0

Poultry, unspecified - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

single 2 0


Switzerland 2005 43

Dogs - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

single 88 0

Cats - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

single 37 0

Rabbits - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

single 2 0

Other animals - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

single 43 3

Footnote

method used: culture


Switzerland 2005 44

2.8. TRICHINELLOSIS


A. Trichinellosis General evaluation


Trichinella infections have not been detected in domestic pigs in Switzerland for many decades.A full study of all slaughtered pigs, as required by European Commission (EC) Regulation2075/2005, has not been carried out to date. From 2001 to 2004, between 400,000 and 490,000pigs (15 to 19% of all slaughtered pigs) were tested every year without any positive findingsbeing obtained. In 2005, a total of 916,791 pigs in three abattoirs were tested, whichcorresponded to 34% of the pigs slaughtered in Switzerland. All results were negative. Also in2005, 14 foals tested negative on slaughter.Trichinellosis and suspicion of trichinelllosis are notifiable since 1966.Investigation of wild boar, bear and nutria is mandatory (Swiss ordinance of meat hygiene,FHyV Art. 35). Meat hygiene tests on 2655 wild boars showed no positive results.However, the fox and lynx are known to harbour Trichinella britovi in Switzerland. Seveninfected foxes were identified in a study in 1992 / 1993 (Jakob et al., Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilk.136: 298-308,1994), and in 2005 the case of a positive lynx was reported for the tenth time since1999. Trichinella infections acquired in Switzerland have probably not occurred in humans foryears in this country. But since human trichinellosis is not a notifiable disease, this cannot bestated with certainty.


There are no observations that would challenge the freedom of Swiss pigs, solipeds and wildboars from trichinellosis. Game animals : fox and lynx harbour Trichinella britovi.


Switzerland 2005 45

2.8.2. Trichinella in animals

A. Trichinella in pigs

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

General

There is no mandatory sampling in pigs. However slaughterhouses that exportmeat or meat products to the EU have to fulfill Council Directive 77/96/EEC of21 December 1976 on the examination for trichinae (trichinella spiralis) uponimportation from third countries of fresh meat derived from domestic swine. In2005, a total of 916,791 pigs in three abattoirs were tested according Regulation77/96/EEC, which corresponded to 34% of the pigs slaughtered in Switzerland.All results were negative. The method used was artificial digestion method.


General

In slaughterhouses that are admitted to export in the EU all pigs are examined. Inslaughterhouses of the national market no pigs are examined. Examined fractionof slaughtered pigs is 34%.


General

Piece of pillar of the diaphragm.


General

Piece of pillar of the diaphragm taken at slaughter.

Case definition

General

Detection of causative organism.


General

Artificial digestion method according regulation 77/96/EEC.


Trichinellosis is a notifiable disease in animals. In humans Trichinellosis is not notifiable.


Switzerland 2005 46


There are no observations that would challenge the freedom of Swiss pigs from trichinellosis.

B. Trichinella in horses

Monitoring system

Sampling strategy

There is no sampling in horses. Few samples are taken sporadically.


14 samples were taken in 2005

Case definition

Detection of causative organism.


Artificial digestion method

Results of the investigation including the origin of the positive animals

Negative results in all samples.


Trichinellosis is a notifiable disease in animals. In humans Trichinellosis is not notifiable.


Switzerland 2005 47

Table Trichinella in animals

- -

So

urc

e o

f in

form

atio

n

Sam

plin

g u

nit

Un

its

test

ed

To

tal a

nim

als

po

siti

ve f

or

Tri

chin

ella

T. s

pir

alis

Tri

chin

ella

sp

p.,

un

spec

ifie

d

Pigs - Swisszoonosesreport 2005

animals 961791 0 0 0

Solipeds, domestic - Swisszoonosesreport 2005

animals 14 0 0 0

Wild boars - - -

wild - Swisszoonosesreport 2005

animals 2655 0 0 0

Footnote

Swiss Zoonoses Report 2005: Swiss Federal Veterinary Office Magazine 3/06(http://www.bvet.admin.ch/archiv/magazin/index.html?lang=en)


Switzerland 2005 48

2.9. ECHINOCOCCOSIS


A. Echinococcus spp general evaluation


Echinococcosis in animals is notifiable, but not in humans. The burden of infection from E. multilocularis has increased because 1) the increasing of the foxpopulation after having eradicated fox rabies, and 2) foxes have extended their habitat to urbanareas. This may mean that the human population is exposed to a higher risk. However, in thelast 35 years there has been no indication of a rise in incidences of alveolar hydatid disease inhumans (seven to ten new cases per year). An increase in case numbers would probably benoticed only after a delay of between 5 and 15 years, as symptoms often occur years afterinfection.






Switzerland 2005 49

2.9.2. Echinococcus in animals

Table Echinococcus spp. in animals

- -

So

urc

e o

f in

form

atio

n

Sam

plin

g u

nit

Un

its

test

ed

To

tal u

nit

s p

osi

tive

fo

r E

chin

oco

ccu

s sp

p.

E. g

ran

ulo

sus

E. m

ult

ilocu

lari

s

Ech

ino

cocc

us

spp

., u

nsp

ecif

ied

Cattle (bovine animals) (1) - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

animal 3 0 0

Sheep (2) - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

animal 1 0 0

Goats (3) - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

animal 0

Pigs (4) - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

animal 4 1 1

Dogs (5) - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

animal 77 14 14

pet animals (8) - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

animal 30 7 7


Switzerland 2005 50

Cats (6) - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

animal 2 0 0

pet animals (9) - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

animal 1 0 0

Foxes (7) - DatabaseInformationCenter forAnimalHealth inSwitzerland(ITS)

animal 33 13 13

(1) : Detection of the agent (PCR and/or AG-ELISA)(2) : Detection of the agent (PCR and/or AG-ELISA)(3) : Detection of the agent (PCR and/or AG-ELISA)(4) : Detection of the agent (PCR and/or AG-ELISA)(5) : Detection of the agent (PCR and/or AG-ELISA)(6) : Detection of the agent (PCR and/or AG-ELISA)(7) : Detection of the agent (PCR and/or AG-ELISA)(8) : Serological Data(9) : Serological Data

Footnote

The data of the table represent the detection either of the agent Echinococcus spp.(methods used: PCR and/orAG-ELISA) or serological data (ELISA). Please note the comments of each line.


Switzerland 2005 51

2.10. TOXOPLASMOSIS


A. Toxoplasmosis general evaluation


There are some sporadic cases of toxoplasmosis in humans and animals. However, due to a lackof surveillance data, the knowledge about the prevalence of the infection in humans and animalsis scarce.


Toxoplasma in animals is notifiable, but not in humans. Sixteen cases in animals were reported since 1997: Sheep (6); Goat (4); Cat (2); Cattle (2);Monky (1); other mamalia (1)


Notifiable disease in animals according to Swiss Regulation of epizootics (TSV Art. 5)




Switzerland 2005 52

2.10.2. Toxoplasma in animals

Table Toxoplasma in animals

- -

So

urc

e o

f in

form

atio

n

Sam

plin

g u

nit

Un

its

test

ed

To

tal u

nit

s p

osi

tive

fo

r T

oxo

pla

sma

Cattle (bovine animals) (1) - Database InformationCenter for AnimalHealth in Switzerland(ITS)

animal 1 0

unspecified (8) - Database InformationCenter for AnimalHealth in Switzerland(ITS)

animal 11 1

Sheep (2) - Database InformationCenter for AnimalHealth in Switzerland(ITS)

animal 2 2

Goats (3) - Database InformationCenter for AnimalHealth in Switzerland(ITS)

animal 1 0

Pigs (4) - Database InformationCenter for AnimalHealth in Switzerland(ITS)

animal 0 -

Solipeds, domestic (5) - Database InformationCenter for AnimalHealth in Switzerland(ITS)

animal 0 -

Dogs (6) - Database InformationCenter for AnimalHealth in Switzerland(ITS)

animal 3 0

pet animals (9) - Database InformationCenter for AnimalHealth in Switzerland(ITS)

animal 137 21

Cats (7) - Database InformationCenter for AnimalHealth in Switzerland(ITS)

animal 261 5

pet animals (10) - Database InformationCenter for AnimalHealth in Switzerland(ITS)

animal 44 11

(1) : Detection of the agent (Methods used: Microscopical analysis of faeces, immunofluorescence and PCR)(2) : Detection of the agent (Methods used: Microscopical analysis of faeces, immunofluorescence and PCR)(3) : Detection of the agent (Methods used: Microscopical analysis of faeces, immunofluorescence and PCR)(4) : Detection of the agent (Methods used: Microscopical analysis of faeces, immunofluorescence and PCR)(5) : Detection of the agent (Methods used: Microscopical analysis of faeces, immunofluorescence and PCR)(6) : Detection of the agent (Methods used: Microscopical analysis of faeces, immunofluorescence and PCR)(7) : Detection of the agent (Methods used: Microscopical analysis of faeces, immunofluorescence and PCR)


Switzerland 2005 53

(8) : Serological Data(9) : Serological Data(10) : Serological Data

Footnote

The numbers in the table stand either for the detection of the agent Toxoplasma gondii (Methods used:Microscopical analysis of faeces, immunofluorescence and PCR) or for serological results. Please note in thiscontext the comments of each line.


Switzerland 2005 54

2.11. RABIES


A. Rabies General evaluation


The European fox rabies epizootic starting in 1939 at the eastern border of Poland reachedSwitzerland on March 3, 1967. Rabies spread over large parts of the country until 1977, the yearit caused three human deaths. In 1978 the first field trial world-wide for the oral immunizationof foxes against rabies was conducted in Switzerland. Initially, the expansion of the vaccinationarea led to a rapid reduction in rabies cases. However, the 1990s were characterized by arecrudescence of rabies in spite of regular oral immunization of foxes. The last endemic case ofrabies was diagnosed in 1996 after an adaptation of the vaccination strategy.A total of 17'109 rabies cases, of which 73% in foxes and 14% in domestic animals werediagnosed, leading to an estimated number of some 25 000 postexposure treatments in humans.To eliminate rabies, a total of 2.8 million baits containing a modified live virus were distributed- mostly by hand - in the field.According to the definitions of the OIE and WHO (no cases for at least two years) Switzerlandhas been officially recognized as free of rabies since 1998. A suspected case of rabies in a dog(urban rabies) was confirmed in 2003, but since the dog was a foundling picked up close to theFrench border, it is highly unlikely that this indicates a focus of rabies infection in Switzerland.Bat rabies has been diagnosed in three cases in the past fifteen years (1992, 1993, 2002).


Switzerland is free from European fox rabies. However, fox rabies is present in the neighbourcountry Germany. There is a risk for the swiss fox population to be re-infected be immigratinginfected foxes.


Vaccination of the Swiss dog population; Rabies testing on animals with suspect symptoms; Apermit from the Swiss Federal Veterinary Office is mandatory for the import and re-import fromcountries which are not free from urban rabies. The animals are checked by the borderveterinarian at entry. The import conditions are: vaccination against rabies; blood test at least 30days after vaccination and subsequent waiting period of 3 months; identification with microchip/ tatoo; veterinary border check.


Swiss rabies center: http://www.cx.unibe.ch/ivv/Swiss_Rabies_Center/swiss_rabies_center.html


Switzerland 2005 55

2.11.2. Lyssavirus (rabies) in animals

Table Rabies in animals

- -

So

urc

e o

f in

form

atio

n

Sam

plin

g u

nit

Un

its

test

ed

To

tal u

nit

s p

osi

tive

fo

r L

yssa

viru

s (r

abie

s)

un

spec

ifie

d ly

ssav

iru

s

Cattle (bovine animals) - National SwissRabies Center

animal 2 0

Solipeds, domestic - National SwissRabies Center

animal 1 0

Dogs - National SwissRabies Center

animal 27 0

Cats - National SwissRabies Center

animal 24 0

Bats - -

-

wild - National SwissRabies Center

animal 11 0

Foxes - -

-


animal 56 0

Badgers - -

-


animal 5 0

Marten - -

-


animal 7 0

Polecats - National SwissRabies Center

animal 1 0

Ferrets - National SwissRabies Center

animal 2 0

Alpine chamois - National SwissRabies Center

animal 1 0

Rats - National SwissRabies Center

animal 1 0

Squirrels - -

-


animal 1 0

Chipmunk - National SwissRabies Center

animal 1 0

Footnote

Swiss Rabies Center: http://www.cx.unibe.ch/ivv/Swiss_Rabies_Center/swiss_rabies_center.html


Switzerland 2005 56

3. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC INDICATORS OF ANTIMICROBIALRESISTANCE


Switzerland 2005 57

3.1. ESCHERICHIA COLI, NON-PATHOGENIC


3.1.2. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli, non-pathogenic isolates


Switzerland 2005 58

4. FOODBORNE OUTBREAKS

Foodborne outbreaks are incidences of two or more human cases of the same disease or infectionwhere the cases are linked or are probably linked to the same food source. Situation, in which theobserved human cases exceed the expected number of cases and where a same food source issuspected, is also indicative of a foodborne outbreak.


Switzerland 2005 59

SWITZERLAND - European Food Safety Authority€¦ · Switzerland 2005 Report on trends and sources...

Documents

Transcript of SWITZERLAND - European Food Safety Authority€¦ · Switzerland 2005 Report on trends and sources...