Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Department of Animal Environment and Health Welfare...

30
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Department of Animal Environment and Health www.slu.se Welfare Indicators for Geese Linda Keeling Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Transcript of Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Department of Animal Environment and Health Welfare...

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se

Welfare Indicators for Geese

Linda Keeling

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se

Animal welfare is a characteristic of the individual animal

”The welfare of an individual is its state as

regards its attempts to cope with its environment” (Broom 1986)

”Welfare is all about how an animal feels” (Duncan 1993)

Indicators of animal welfare should reflect the state of the animal

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se

Welfare outcome indicators

The input based approach to welfare assessment

The outcome based approach to welfare assessment

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se

The Five Freedoms (FAWC)

Freedom from fear and distress

Freedom from hunger and thirst

Freedom from discomfort

Freedomfrom pain, injury

or disease

Freedom to express

normal behaviour

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se

The Five Freedoms

Freedom from fear and distress

Freedom from hunger and thirst

Freedom from discomfort

Freedomfrom pain, injury

or disease

Freedom to express

normal behaviour

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se

Good housing

Good

feeding

Appropriate

behaviourGood

health

Expressing social behaviour

Good human-animal relationship

Expressing other behaviour

Thirst

Thermal comfort

Comfort around resting

Ease of movement

No disease

Positive emotional state

Hunger

No injuries

No painful management procedures

Welfare

Quality

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se12 criteria of animal welfare from Welfare Quality

Good housing

Good

feeding

Appropriate

behaviourGood

health

Expressing social behaviour

Good human-animal relationship

Expressing other behaviour

Thirst

Thermal comfort

Comfort around resting

Ease of movement

No disease

No painful management procedures

No fear

No injuries

Body condition Outcome measure

Hunger

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se12 criteria of animal welfare from Welfare Quality

Good housing

Good

feeding

Appropriate

behaviourGood

health

Expressing social behaviour

Good human-animal relationship

Expressing other behaviour

Thirst

Thermal comfort

Comfort around resting

Ease of movement

No disease

No painful management procedures

No fear

Hunger

No injuries

• Hairless patches• Lesions (wounds, scabs)• Swellings• Lameness

Positiveemotional state

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se

Welfare indicators should be….

• Valid• Reliable

– Can be recorded by different people– Can be recorded by same person on different occasions– Are not affected by time of day or weather etc

• Feasible, if going to be used in commercial practice

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se

Good welfare

Poor welfare

No indicators of poor welfare

Many indicators of poor welfare

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se

Good welfare

Poor welfare

No indicators of poor welfare

Occasional indicator of poor welfare

Many indicators of poor welfare

Some indicators of poor welfare

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se

Assessing overall welfare

(on a farm)

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se

Assessing overall welfare

(on a farm)

vs

Assessing welfare in a specific situation

(feather collection)

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se

Good housing

Good

feeding

Appropriate

behaviourGood

health

Expressing social behaviour

Good human-animal relationship

Expressing other behaviour

Thirst

Thermal comfort

Comfort around resting

Ease of movement

No disease

Positive emotional state

Hunger

No injuries

No painful management procedures

Welfare

QualityX

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se

Good housing

Good

feeding

Appropriate

behaviourGood

health

Expressing social behaviour

Good human-animal relationship

Expressing other behaviour

Thirst

Thermal comfort

Comfort around resting

Ease of movement

No disease

Positive emotional state

Hunger

No injuries

No painful management procedures

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se

EFSA

• Working group identified a series of potential welfare outcome indicators for geese

• Discussed potential indicators with hearing experts

• Classified them into short, medium and long term indicators

Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDepartment of Animal Environment and Health

www.slu.se

Timing of the collection of the welfare indicators

Starting to catch

Removing feathers

Minutes after release

Day after

Week after

• Stress • Stress hormones• Heart rate• Fear defecation

Potential welfare indicators for geese

• Stress • Stress hormones• Heart rate• Fear defecation

Could be difficult in commercial practice

Potential welfare indicators for geese

Potential welfare indicators for geese

• Stress• Disorientation • Lack of balance

• Falling over• Bumping into objects

Could be difficult to score

• Stress• Disorientation• Hanging wings Inappropriate feathers

removed

Count number of birds – ideal is zero

Potential welfare indicators for geese

• Stress• Disorientation• Hanging wings• Dislocation• Broken bones• Dead animals Count number of birds

Potential welfare indicators for geese

• Stress• Disorientation• Hanging wings• Dislocation• Broken bones• Dead animals• Skin injuries

Count number of birds with wounds The number of wounds per bird Classify wounds according to size or severity

Potential welfare indicators for geese

Timing of the collection of the welfare indicators

Starting to catch

Removing feathers

Minutes after release

Day after

Week after

Hanging wingsSkin injuries

Larger skin injuries, dislocated and broken bones

Timing of the collection of the welfare indicators

Starting to catch

Removing feathers

Minutes after release

Day after

Week after

Hanging wingsSkin injuries

Larger skin injuries, dislocated and broken bones

Wrong type of feathersBlood on the feathers

Welfare Indicators for geese

• They exist

Welfare Indicators for geese

• They exist

• They can be used at the time feathers removed or for a period of time afterwards

Welfare Indicators for geese

• They exist

• They can be used at the time feathers removed or for a period of time afterwards

• Some are similar to those currently used in other farm animals (potentially as valid and reliable)

Welfare Indicators for geese

• They exist

• They can be used at the time feathers removed or for a period of time afterwards

• Some are similar to those currently used in other farm animals (potentially as valid and reliable)

• Allow quantification of the consequences of the process on the animal

Welfare Indicators for geese

• They exist

• They can be used at the time feathers removed or for a period of time afterwards

• Some are similar to those currently used in other farm animals (potentially as valid and reliable)

• Allow quantification of the consequences of the process on the animal

• It is an ethical decision of where thresholds of acceptability lie