Sustainable Design and Manufacturing Bert Bras Sustainable Design & Manufacturing George W. Woodruff...

29
Sustainable Design and Manufacturing Bert Bras Sustainable Design & Manufacturing George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332-0405 www.sdm.gatech.edu

Transcript of Sustainable Design and Manufacturing Bert Bras Sustainable Design & Manufacturing George W. Woodruff...

Sustainable Design and Manufacturing

Bert BrasSustainable Design & Manufacturing

George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical EngineeringGeorgia Institute of Technology

Atlanta, GA 30332-0405www.sdm.gatech.edu

Sustainability: Common Definition

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009

“development that meets the needs of the present generation without compromising the needs of future generations.”

United Nations’ World Commission on Environment and Development in their report “Our Common Future”, 1987

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009

Sustainability: Working within the Physical Limits

Earth

Ecosystems Urban Regions

Industry

Sourcing

Material

Production

Distribution

Use

Waste (land, water, air emissions

Product Re-X

Extraction

Power Sources(Sun, Moon, Earth)

SocietyNature

Bottom-line: The extractive capability of humanity (and its industrial system) must be balanced with the regenerative capacity of the Earth.

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009

Sustainability’s “Triple Bottom Line”

Sustainability is defined in three dimensions:

• Environmental

– Destroying our resources will hurt us long term

– Some materials already getting scarce

• Financial

– Being bankrupt helps nobody

• Social

– Quality of Life should go up

– Workforce education and retention

Goal is to have win-win-win technologies and solutions

“Green Economy”

“People-Planet-Profit”

Some Business Drivers• Legislation:

– Clean Air Act has limited use of a number of materials.– (European) take-back legislation is driving Design for Recycling efforts.

• Risk & Liability– Using hazardous materials can be risky and create many liabilities

• Customers: – Awareness of environmental issues is increasing among customers. In Europe, some customers

will already pay more for a product if it is green.– Industrial customers (e.g., Original Equipment Manufacturers) do not want (future)

environmental liability for your product.

• Image: – Being “green” is good.

• ISO 14000:– ISO 14000 (environmental management standards) certification has become an important element

in doing business, like ISO 9000 (quality management standards).

• In addition, many have noted that DFE makes good business sense and has many other positive effects.

– Reduction of waste, driver for new creative solutions, etc.

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

Image is Everything

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

Sustainability Challenges Overseas• China, India, etc., are all facing severe environmental,

health, and quality of life problems as a result of their industrial growth

• As a US designer and firm, you are contributing to their problems

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2008

Life Cycle Assessment (ISO 14040)

• LCA is one means to try to investigate some of the issues for these systems

• LCA examines the environmental burdens and impact of a product over its entire life-cycle (see ISO 14040)

Disposal

MiningMaterial

processingProduct

manufactureDistribution

Product take-back

Material de-manufacture

Energy recovery with incineration

Use +

Service

Product demanufacture

Environment: air, sea, land 1234

Clean fuel production via pyrolysis

2 = Remanufacture of reusable components

3 = Reprocessing of recycled material

4 = Monomer / raw material regeneration

1 = Direct recycling / reuse

Manufacture

Demanufacture

Bras, B. (1997). "Incorporating Environmental Issues in Product Realization." United Nations Industry and Environment 20(1-2): 7-13.

Schematic of Product Life-Cycle

Takes a lot of work

Materials

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

Materials Issues

• Many materials are subject to legislations/regulations, e.g.:

US:

• EPA “list of lists”– The “Title III List of Lists” is the key to EPCRA and is available from:

• http://www.epa.gov/ceppo/pubs/title3.pdf

EU:

• Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS)

• REACH

Industry:

• GADSL (Global Automotive Declarable Substance List)• http://www.americanchemistry.com/s_plastics/doc.asp?CID=1106&DID=9293

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

RoHS

• RoHS is often referred to as the lead-free directive, but it restricts the use of the following six substances:– Lead (Pb)

– Mercury (Hg)

– Cadmium (Cd)

– Hexavalent chromium (Cr6+)

– Polybrominated biphenyls (PBB)

– Polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE)

• PBB and PBDE are flame retardants used in several plastics.

• Lots of companies want suppliers to certify that they are “RoHS compliant”

• If one part is not compliant, the whole product is not eitherCopyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

EPA and Toxic Release Inventory (TRI)

• You have to fill in a TRI (like a tax report) if you use certain hazardous chemicals in manufacturing and it is posted online:– www.epa.gov/triexplorer/

• In the US, look at the EPA “list of lists” to see when you should worry about permits and special rules– www.epa.gov/ceppo/pubs/title3.pdf

• Best thing is not to use any of these chemicals or let somebody else (your supplier) deal with it

• Biggest air polluters: coal fired power plants• Biggest land polluters: mines

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)

• Check MSDS of materials if you want to be safe w.r.t. any health risks from a material you want to use in your design– Also think about worker safety (OSHA)

• MSDS can be obtained from material providers– Should be available upon request or onlinE

• GREAT list of online MSDS and related databases is at:– http://www.ilpi.com/msds/

• Quick and easy online (free) MSDS database:– http://hazard.com/msds/

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

Energy & GHG

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

Example - Two Automotive Parts

• Simple question: What is better? – Virgin manufacturing & disposal

– Recycling

– Remanufacturing

Aluminum transfer case

Steel pinion gear

… and by how much?

NSF Grant # 0522116 Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

Al Process Energy Consumption (kWh/ton)E

NE

RG

Y C

ON

SU

MP

TIO

Nk

Wh

/ton

SA

LA

BL

E A

LU

MIN

UM

ALUMINUM TRANSFER CASE PRODUCTION PROCESSES

ELECTROLYSIS ALUMINAPRODUCTION

SORTING MELTING CASTING

15 000

14 000

5000

1000

MACHININGRecy/dispo

15 000

14 000

5 000

1400450 20

4

MACHININGRemanufacturing

38

CLEANING

14

Ore extracting

Refining processes have the highest energy consumption

Machining processes energy consumption is low

NSF Grant # 0522116

De-Materialization should be higher priority from an energy point of view → product design

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

Steel Processing Energy ConsumptionE

NE

RG

Y C

ON

SU

MP

TIO

Nk

Wh

/ton

SA

LA

BL

E S

TE

EL

STEEL PRODUCTION PROCESSES

SinterMAKING

Iron Pig MAKING

MELTINGSORTINGCASTING CLEANINGMACHININGRemanufacturing

MACHININGRecy/dispo

4850

1680

730 700

Steel MAKING

350

4000

135

4000

8000

30

Ore extracting

Refining processes have the highest energy consumption

Machining processes energy consumption is low

NSF Grant # 0522116

De-Materialization again will result in higher gains from an energy point of view

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

Energy Consumption in Manufacturing SectorsMECS Survey Years

NAICS Subsector and Industry 1998 2002311 Food 1,044 1,123

312 Beverage and Tobacco Products 108 105

313 Textile Mills 256 207 314 Textile Product Mills 50 60 315 Apparel 48 30 316 Leather and Allied Products 8 7 321 Wood Products 509 377 322 Paper 2,747 2,363 323 Printing and Related Support 98 98 324 Petroleum and Coal Products 7,320 6,799 325 Chemicals 6,064 6,465 326 Plastics and Rubber Products 328 351 327 Nonmetallic Mineral Products 979 1,059 331 Primary Metals 2,560 2,120 332 Fabricated Metal Products 445 388 333 Machinery 217 177

334 Computer and Electronic Products 205 201

335Electrical Equip., Appliances, and Components

143 172

336 Transportation Equipment 492 429 337 Furniture and Related Products 88 64 339 Miscellaneous 89 71

Manufacturing 23,796 22,666

• Manufacturing process energy savings are small when majority is embodied in upfront material production/refining

• Relocating a manufacturing facility to a locality with renewable power often has a larger carbon footprint effect than any process efficiency improvement

GA Power Plant Bowen (Cartersville):

– CO2 emission: 0.9 kg/kWh

– H2O evaporation: 0.4 gallons/kWh

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009

Consumption of Energy (Site Energy) for All Purposes (First Use) for Selected Industries, 1998 and 2002 (Trillion Btu)

Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-846, Manufacturing Energy Consumption Surveys, 1998 and 2002, http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/efficiency/mecs_trend_9802/mecs9802_table1a.html

DoE Energy information Agency

• One of the best sites to find all kind of info on energy:– http://www.eia.doe.gov/

• For checking how much greenhouse gas emissions are created by burning gasoline, coal, methane, etc, see:– http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/coefficients.html

– http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/emission_factors.html

– Example: gasoline => 19.564 lbs CO2/gallon

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

Regional Variation in CO2 Emissions

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

• http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/emission_factors.html

Region Carbon Dioxide (Metric tons/ MWh)

(1) New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine 0.466(2) New Jersey, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Maryland, West Virginia, Ohio, Indiana and Michigan 0.782(3) Illinois and Wisconsin 0.638(4) Missouri, Kentucky, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Georgia 0.69(5) Florida 0.678(6) Texas 0.73(7) Oklahoma and Kansas 0.867(8) North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Minnesota and Iowa 0.875(9) Colorado, Utah, Nevada, Wyoming and Montana 0.909(10) New Mexico and Arizona 0.658(11) Oregon, Washington and Idaho 0.147(12) California 0.35(13) Hawaii 0.858(14) Alaska 0.749(15) U.S. Territories 0.858U.S. Average 0.676

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2008

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

Metal refining Melting Aqueous cleaning Machining (Water)

Wat

er w

aste

[L/to

n m

etal

]

Aluminum Steel

Refining metal requires large amount of water specially for cooling and rinsing

systems

High water consumption related to the geometry of

the transfer case part and the material

Processes Water waste[kg/ton

Water waste[kg/ton steel]

Metal refining 10,000 15,000Casting 105 105Melting 320 4,000Cleaning 4,150 320

Machining 1,830 190TOTAL 16,405 19,615

This does not include water use from electricity generation (about 0.4-0.7 gallons/kWh for thermo-electric plants)

Water

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

Use Phase

• Typically, any energy consuming product has the largest environmental in its use phase– Exceptions always exist

• Conservation is good!– Every kWh or Joule saved by the product saves another 2-3 upstream

• Beware of “rebound effect”– You created a more efficient product, but it is going to be used more

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

End Of Life

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

Linear Production: “Take, make, waste” (our current system)

MaterialProcessing

ProductManufacture Distribution

DisposalUse

Materials Extracted from Biosphere

Materials Mined from Lithosphere

MaterialProcessing

ProductManufacture DistributionMaterial

ProcessingProduct

Manufacture Distribution

DisposalUse DisposalUse

Materials Extracted from Biosphere

Materials Mined from Lithosphere

aaa

MaterialProcessing

ProductManufacture Distribution

ProductTake-Back

ProductDemanufacture

MaterialDemanufacture

Disposal

Manufacture

Demanufacture

Energy recoverywith incineration

Clean fuelproduction viapyrolysis

1= Direct reuse2= Remanufacture of reusable components3= Reprocessing of recycled material4= Monomer/raw material generation

1234 Use

Materials ExtractedFrom Biosphere

Materials MinedFrom Lithosphere

Closed Loop Production (future system)

WEEE Directive

• The Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (WEEE Directive) is the European Community directive 2002/96/EC on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) which sets collection, recycling and recovery targets for all types of electrical goods.

• Original Equipment Manufacturers are responsible for appropriate collection and treatment.

• Each country can have different implementation

• Think about how you will ensure that your (electronic) product will not end up on a landfill and can be recycled

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

Design for Environment Guidelines & Scoring

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

1 Selection of low-impact materials Non-hazardous materials Non-exhaustable materials Low energy content materials Recycled materials Recyclable materials

0 New Concept Development Dematerialisation Shared use of the product Integration of functions

Functional optimization of product (components)

2 Reduction of material Reduction in weight Reduction in (transport) volume

3 Optimization of production techniques Alternative production techniques Fewer production processes Low/clean energy consumption Low generation of waste Few/clean production consumables

4 Efficient distribution system Less/clean packaging Efficient transport mode Efficient logistics

5 Reduction of the environmental impact in the user stage Low energy consumption Clean energy source Few consumables needed during use Clean consumables during use No energy/auxiliary material use

6 Optimization of initial life-time Reliability and durability Easy maintenance and repair Modular product structure Classic design User taking care of product

7 Optimization of end-of-life system Reuse of product Remanufacturing/refurbishing Recycling of materials Clean incineration

Brezet, J. C. and al., e., 1994, PROMISE Handleiding voor Milieugerichte Produkt Ontwikkeling (PROMISE Manual for Environmentally Focused Product Development), SDU Uitgeverij, The Hague, The Netherlands.

Opportunities

• Think “holistically” about your product.

• Your product is part of a bigger system

• Thinking bigger may actually reduce cost– Can you reuse parts?

– Can you lease instead of sell/buy?

– Is the product really the end, or is it just a provider of a function?

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

Plus Digital

ADVANTiX Switchable

MAX Water & Sport

MAX Flash

MAX HQ

Black & White

FUN SAVER 35 Flash

MAX Outdoor

Disposal

MiningMaterial

processingProduct

manufactureDistribution

Product take-back

Material de-manufacture

Energy recovery with incineration

Use +

Service

Product demanufacture

Environment: air, sea, land 1234

Clean fuel production via pyrolysis

2 = Remanufacture of reusable components

3 = Reprocessing of recycled material

4 = Monomer / raw material regeneration

1 = Direct recycling / reuse

Manufacture

Demanufacture

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2008

Importance of Sound Engineering

• Many systems are over-engineered

• Appropriate technology and sound engineering can go a long way towards sustainability

• Switching from Class 8 High Duty Diesel trucks to Ford F750 can provide significant savings.

• Ideas were triggered by quest for fuel savings.

Human Rights: Think about the social consequences of your products - Image is Everything

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010

In Closing

• In your project, you can – Calculate energy consumption and corresponding CO2 emissions– Check for RoHS compliance– Check and include MSDS sheets for potential problem materials– Increase recyclability by reducing number of different materials– Use recycled materials and/or reused parts– Etc.

• Achieving sustainability problems is a very complex, multi-scale problem requiring multi-disciplinary teams and approaches

• Think about the social and environmental consequences of your products

• But don’t forget the basics – good engineering & decision making is good for people-planet-profit!

Copyright Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009