Sustainability of Cross- Border RTDI Projects and Networks -The Case of CIRCE Klaus Schuch ZSI –...
-
Upload
noah-vaughn -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
2
Transcript of Sustainability of Cross- Border RTDI Projects and Networks -The Case of CIRCE Klaus Schuch ZSI –...
Sustainability of Cross-Border RTDI Projects and Networks-The Case of CIRCE
Klaus SchuchZSI – Centre for Social Innovation
Austrian funded cross-border RTDI programme
In the first 3 calls 395 participants (mainly SMEs) involved
Partners were initially primarily from „Central Europe“; recently mostly from SEE
Seite 4
Programme Goals1. Increasing the innovation capacity of
enterprises and their capability to absorb and apply external knowledge
2. Increasing the cooperation capacity of enterprises and creation of cross-border innovation networks and cooperation structures
Both goals go together!
Seite 5
Basic Assumption
1) Innovation happens through cooperation (approximated by measuring exchange density, - intensity and patterns)
2) A balanced use for project partners and their contribution to build up capacities and knowledge depends on functioning exchange relations (approximated by inclusion/exclusion of partners; accessibility of partners etc.)
Globalisation of business R&D: the changing determinants of location
1996 to 2005
Legacy11%
Closeto HQ
7%
ProximityProduction
13%
Market &Customer
Insight19%
SkillsCapabilities
22%
Subsidiesincentives
14%
LowCost skills
9%
Up to 1979
Legacy29%
SkillsCapabilities
16%
ProximityProduction
18%
Close toHQ14%
MarketCustomer
10%
Subsidiesincentives
9%
1980 to 1995
Legacy17%
SkillsCapabilities
16%
Close toHQ10%
ProximityProduction
17%
Market &Customer
Insight19%
LowCost skills
2%
Subsidiesincentives
13%
Source: INSEAD survey
Seite 7
Measurement of Exchange Relations1. Communication about project
management 2. Communication about project content3. Non-project related communication4. Exchange of goods5. Exchange of services6. Exchange of money7. Exchange about important contacts8. Exchange about other important
information
9. And mutual trust!
Seite 8
Objective of our Study
Investigation how project networks are developing
Conclusion can be drawn on:
1) the management of project networks2) the development of science-industry relations3) development of customer-vendor relations4) development of internationalisation5) sustainability of public interventions
Seite 9
Evaluation Concept
t1
1 year after(t4)
t2
t3
Seite 10
Science-Industry Relations
Benchmark: at least 80 % of all possible relations between science and industry in terms of exchange about project content and other valuable information should be realised. Proj_cont density: science -> industry (SMEs) > 80 %
Information density: science -> industry (SMEs) > 80 %
Seite 11
Development of Science-Industry Relations
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00% proj_1
proj_2
proj_3 proj_4
proj_5
project content T1
project content T2
project content T3
Seite 12
Internationalisation
Benchmark: at least 30 % of all possible exchange relations between Austrian and foreign partners should be realised
of Exchange Austrian <-> EE/SEE partners > 30 %partners
Seite 13
Development of international exchange relations
All exchange relations – network density between Austrian and non-Austrian
Project_3 T1 46/485 = 9.48 %
All exchange relations – network density between Austrian and non-Austrian
Project_3 T2 50/405 = 12.35 %
All exchange relations – network density between Austrian and non-Austrian
Project_3 T3 175/469 = 37.31%
Seite 14
Increasing Network Density by Project (T1 vs T3)
Relative change between project start and project end (in percentage points)
-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Projekt 1
Projekt 2
Projekt 3
Projekt 4
Projekt 5
project management
project content
not project related communications
goods exchange
services exchange
contacts exchange
information exchange
trust
Seite 15
Development of Project Networks (T1 vs T3)
0
20
40
60
80
100proj_management T1
proj_content T1
non-proj-related T1
goods T1
services T1
contacts T1
information T1
trust T1
proj_1
proj_2
proj_3
proj_4
proj_5
Seite 16
Development of Project Networks (T1 vs T3)
0
20
40
60
80
100proj_management T2
proj_content T2
non-proj-related T2
goods T2
services T2
contacts T2
information T2
trust T2
proj_1
proj_2
proj_3
proj_4
proj_5
Seite 17
Development of Project Networks (T1 vs T3)
0
20
40
60
80
100proj_management T3
proj_content T3
non-proj-related T3
goods T3
services T3
contacts T3
information T3
trust T3
proj_1
proj_2
proj_3
proj_4
proj_5
So Far - So Good?
Seite 19
Entwicklung der Netzwerke (T1 vs T4)
0
20
40
60
80
100proj_management T1
proj_content T1
non-proj-related T1
goods T1
services T1
contacts T1
information T1
trust T1
proj_1
proj_2
proj_3
proj_4
proj_5
Seite 20
Entwicklung der Netzwerke (T1 vs T4)
0
20
40
60
80
100proj_management T2
proj_content T2
non-proj-related T2
goods T2
services T2
contacts T2
information T2
trust T2
proj_1
proj_2
proj_3
proj_4
proj_5
Seite 21
Entwicklung der Netzwerke (T1 vs T4)
0
20
40
60
80
100proj_management T3
proj_content T3
non-proj-related T3
goods T3
services T3
contacts T3
information T3
trust T3
proj_1
proj_2
proj_3
proj_4
proj_5
Seite 22
Entwicklung der Netzwerke (T1 vs T4)
0
20
40
60
80
100proj_management T4
proj_content T4
non-proj-related T4
goods T4
services T4
contacts T4
information T4
trust T4
proj_1
proj_2
proj_3
proj_4
proj_5
Seite 23
Zuwachs der Netzwerkdichte pro Projekt (T1 vs T4)
Relative Change Between T1 and T4 (in percentage points )
-50 -30 -10 10 30 50 70 90 110 130 150
Project 1
Project 2
Project 3
Project 4
Project 5
project management
project content
non-project-related communication
goods exchange
services exchange
contacts exchange
information exchange
trust
Seite 24
Sustainability
Not all exchange relations make sense for measuring sustainability (e.g. project management)T4 > T1
– Trust network density – project content exchange relations– Other valuable information exchange
Seite 25
Development of Trust (T1 vs T4)
Seite 26
Project and non-project related communication (T1 vs T4)
Seite 27
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
T1 T2 T3 T4
proj_cont intensity project_1
proj_cont intensity project_2
proj_cont intensity project_3
proj_cont intensity project_4
proj_cont intensity project_5
Intensity of project related communication(T1 vs T4)(low=1; very high=3)
Seite 28
Sustainability of Science-Industry relations
T4 > T1– exchange on project content continues– exchange of other valuable information
continues
Seite 29
Industry-science Relations DynamicsRegarding Project Content Exchange and Information Exchange
T1->T3 and T1->T4
-60,00 -40,00 -20,00 0,00 20,00 40,00 60,00 80,00
proj_1
proj_2
proj_3
proj_4
proj_5
percentage points
project content t1->t3
project content t1->t4
information exchange t1->t3
information exchange t1->t4
Project content exchange and exchange about other valuable information (T1 vs T4)
Seite 30
Sustainability of Customer-Vendor relations
T4 > T1– Exchange of goods– Exchange of services
Seite 31
Change of network density by category (T1 vs T4)
Durchschnittliche Dichte von Projektstart bis Nachhaltigkeitserhebung (in %)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
project start (T1)
interim report (T2)
project end (T3)
sustainability (T4)