Survey Results & analysis for
description
Transcript of Survey Results & analysis for
![Page 1: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Survey Results & analysis for
NCMA Board of Directors Assessment Checklist (November
4, 2012)
![Page 2: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Executive SummaryThis report contains a detailed statistical analysis of the results to the survey titled NCMA Board of Directors Assessment Checklist (November 4, 2012) . The results analysis includes answers from all respondents who took the survey in the 14 day period from Monday, November 12, 2012 to Sunday, November 25, 2012. 18 completed responses were received to the survey during this time.
![Page 3: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Survey Results & AnalysisSurvey: NCMA Board of Directors Assessment Checklist (November 4, 2012)
Author: Karen Secker
Filter:
Responses Received: 18
![Page 4: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
1) 1). Was there a quality agenda?
![Page 5: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Comments:
Meetings are always well run and very efficient!
I was disappointed that all committe reports were not shared with other committees. How else can we judge or benchmark how out committee is doing. Yes you can take something off of the consent agenda, but board interaction on each committee can yield benifits for all of us. not much substance was discussed.
The agenda was meaty and the timing was very good.
![Page 6: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
3) 2). Did the agenda have the right mix of strategic and tactical topics/issues?
![Page 7: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Comments:
This was my second meeting as a member of the BOD. I felt that the mix was very good.
Too much discussion on the CMLDP program. The Board should get a recommendation on the way ahead, not fix the program.
![Page 8: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
5) 3). Was Board member read-ahead material distributed in sufficient time before the meeting to allow the participants to prepare for the meeting?
![Page 9: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Comments:
There were a lot of committee reports. I quickly reviewed them, but it might help to briefly summarize the activities vice discussion by exception.
Slight impact by uncontrollable weather conditions.
![Page 10: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
7) 4). For actions where votes were required of the Board, was sufficient, fact-based material presented to allow the Board member to make an informed decision?
![Page 11: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Comments:
NOT MAN VOTES
![Page 12: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
9) 5). Did Board members arrive at the meeting prepared to address the topics listed in the agenda to enable constructive and meaningful discussions with facts and supporting information?
![Page 13: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
11) 6). Was the meeting held in a location and atmosphere that was free of distractions and discomfort so that participants could concentrate on the meeting?
![Page 14: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Comments:
The meeting location was excellent.
![Page 15: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
13) 7). Were meeting support items available for use and operable (computers, projector, screen, soft copy presentations, white board, good markers, erasers, easel, paper, etc.) and did at least one person know how to work them?
![Page 16: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Comments:
Not many used them,
![Page 17: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
15) 8). Were the right people and resources available at the meeting to adequately address the items listed in the agenda?
![Page 18: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Comments:
Great to have the NCMA staff there, particularly Sam for this meeting.
![Page 19: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
17) 9). Were action items from the last meeting reviewed and the results of the actions reported?
![Page 20: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Comments:
The big discussion last BOD was on the Tysons Corner chapter, no detailed what happend to who, or when it will happen. Criminal charges not filed, why? What detailed finding came of it?
I was surprised one action was not closed from the closed session, but hopefully it will be resolved next meeting.
![Page 21: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
19) 10) Was the meeting controlled such that:
![Page 22: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
19.1) 10a) It started and ended on time(10) Was the meeting controlled such that:)
![Page 23: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
19.2) 10b) Sufficient time was spent on each topic(10) Was the meeting controlled such that:)
![Page 24: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
19.3) 10c) Inputs from everyone were solicited(10) Was the meeting controlled such that:)
![Page 25: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
19.4) 10d) People learned, understood positions presented, cooperated, and the Board was able to obtain consensus (for the most part)(10) Was the meeting controlled such that:)
![Page 26: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
19.5) 10e) Everyone was respected and treated professionally(10) Was the meeting controlled such that:)
![Page 27: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Comments:
10c) There was one issue where we missed an opportunity to engage the CMLDP candidates. The issue was why did young professionals not support an activity we sponsored?
I was not certain the staff was prepared for the CMLDP discussion. This is an important program for NCMA and we need an unbiased assessment of the status and potential need for changes.
![Page 28: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
21) 11). If the meeting was prolonged, did the topic of discussion merit extending the meeting beyond the scheduled time for adjournment?
![Page 29: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
23) 12). Was there a "comfort" break provided and refreshments supplied or allowed to be brought in?
![Page 30: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Comments:
Need to provide what is stated on agenda.
Probably should have scheduled a break, after a few people left one was called.
![Page 31: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
25) 13). Were accurate action items recorded and read at the end of the meeting for concurrence by the Board members?
![Page 32: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Comments:
I think it would be better if the action items were prepared in a slide format and then shown at the end of the meeting to the BoD to get agreement on the wording of the Action Items and the owners
![Page 33: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
27) Do you believe the Board of Directors would lose significant engagement with NCMA members if the Board of Directors meeting was separated from ADC?
![Page 34: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Comment Responses:
this is the only time we can interact
However, we do have other opportunities
I like the meetings held concurrently
ADC not our largest conference.
BoD members should be attending both.
![Page 35: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
28) Do you believe the Board of Directors meeting would lose significant engagement of board members if it was separated from ADC?
![Page 36: Survey Results & analysis for](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062810/56815c3c550346895dca3399/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Comment Responses:
I will not attend any event with no BOD
ADC not our largest conference.
no reason to separate?
The networking is good w/members