Survey Findings: Public Attitudes on Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac & Housing Reform

download Survey Findings: Public Attitudes on Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac & Housing Reform

of 3

Transcript of Survey Findings: Public Attitudes on Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac & Housing Reform

  • 7/28/2019 Survey Findings: Public Attitudes on Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac & Housing Reform

    1/3

    MEMORANDUM

    TO: American Action Forum

    FROM: Wes Anderson

    DATE: 7/15/13

    RE: Survey of Public Viewpoints on Policy Toward Fannie/Freddie

    Methodology

    The following survey was conducted by OnMessage Inc. within 18 congressional districts. Telephone

    interviews were conducted June 17-20, 2013. This survey consists of 1,200 likely voters. Interviews were

    stratified by previous election results to reflect historic voter trends. The margin of error for this survey is

    +/- 2.82%.

    We recently came out of the field with a survey for American Action Forum of 18 congressional districts

    across the United States, investigating various regulatory reform measures for the financial services

    industry currently being discussed in Congress. These districts were broken into three groups to gain an

    understanding of the views of different parts of the population. The groupings were as follows:

    conservative districts, districts where Romney garnered less than 47% (R in D seats), and pure swing

    districts.

    Overarching Findings:

    The Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac surprise.o We were surprised that a large majority of the voters have a hard ID of Fannie and

    Freddie. They are viewed favorably by only 20% and unfavorably by 52%. This is a

    net negative -32, with even a net negative -12 among Democrats. Coming out of the

    financial crisis of 2008, Fannie and Freddie took on the role of central villains and

    have not recovered. The public image of these two entities is nearly toxic!

    Greatest concern with Wall Street & the banking industry.o 52% of the voters said that their greatest concern is either no accountability of banks

    and Wall Street or that Wall Street banks are so big that if they fail the taxpayers will

    have to bail them out again. Somewhat surprisingly, the biggest issue the voters have

    with Wall Street is not directly related to consumer products or services, but ratherthe sway Wall Street has over our economy. That finding is echoed throughout the

    survey and helps explain why the fear of further, massive bailouts of Wall Street

    firms is both pervasive and persuasive.

  • 7/28/2019 Survey Findings: Public Attitudes on Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac & Housing Reform

    2/3

    Bailout and Response:

    Bailout Policyo By a small margin (+11) voters are still unfavorable toward the bank bailouts of

    TARP. However, voters within the R in D seats are fairly evenly split.

    Effectiveness of banking regulations.o Voters are split on the effectiveness of recent banking regulations (38% more harm

    than good / 41% been helpful). More importantly, neither supporters nor opponents

    of these new regulations reach 50%. The real finding here is that the voters know

    very little of this subject and therefore have not formed an opinion on the matter.

    Fannie/Freddie Policy

    Fannie & Freddie phase out.o A majority favor (52%) phasing out both Fannie and Freddie with even a plurality of

    voters in R in D seats supporting phase out. At the start of this debate Fannie and

    Freddie have few friends among the voters.

    Fannie / Freddie informed favorability.o When informed that Fannie and Freddie played an instrumental role in the housing

    bubble and received nearly $200 billion dollars in a bailout, voters opposition to

    Fannie and Freddie moves to 59%, including even 51% of Democrats. These

    arguments are particularly potent in shaping public opinion on Fannie and Freddie.

    Additionally, the notion that Fannie and Freddie could require more public money in

    future bailouts is unacceptable to a sizable majority of the voters.

    Arguments for Fannie / Freddie phase out.o The following two arguments were the most prominent in support of phase out.

    Message OverallConservative

    Districts

    Rep inDemSeats

    SwingDistricts

    While the taxpayers were bailing them out, Fannie Mae andFreddie Mac were committing accounting fraud while their

    executives were receiving millions of dollars in bonuses57/24 58/22 57/26 56/26

    Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have required massive taxpayerbailouts and should be phased out because homeowners who

    are struggling topay their own mortgage shouldnt be forced topay for their neighbors mortgage too.

    56/23 57/21 56/26 55/24

  • 7/28/2019 Survey Findings: Public Attitudes on Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac & Housing Reform

    3/3

    Summary

    The debate over the future of Fannie and Freddie starts with both organizations at near toxic levels of

    negativity among the voters. Even a majority of Democrat voters are negative toward both entities. Voter

    opinions about Fannie and Freddie and their future all but collapse when reminded about the massive

    nature of taxpayer bailouts they received.

    Wes Anderson is a leading national pollster with 20 years of experience in opinion research. As a founding partner Wes now leads the polling

    divisions of OnMessage Inc. and OnMessage Sports, providing political and corporate clients with a full spectrum of quantitative and qualitative

    opinion research products. You can read more about Wes Anderson at onmessageinc.com.