Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements vs... · Surface vs. Immersion Temperature...
Transcript of Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements vs... · Surface vs. Immersion Temperature...
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Bill Bergquist, Sr. Applications EngineerJeff Wigen, National Sales Manager
Jeff Bill
Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements© Burns Engineering
Selecting an RTD or thermocouplePlacement
• Surface mount• Immersion
Protection• Hazardous atmosphere• Ambient temperature• Water• Corrosive/erosive• Sunlight
Performance• Accuracy• Durability• Long term stability
PriceService life
Today’s Discussion
There are five main areas to look at when selecting an RTD for a particular application. We’ll go through each of them and add features to address each area.
3
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Two optionsSurface mountImmersion
Placement
For a pipe there are two options, surface mounted or immersion. The two parts on the left are just two of a wide variety of surface mount sensors available and the two on the right are examples of the two most common styles of immersion sensors.
4
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Placement
Surface mount
Installation of a surface mount sensor can be accomplished with a hose clamp, tape, or adhesive.
5
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Placement
6
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Placement
7
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Some types of surface mount sensors are flush mounted to the ID of a tank or pipe. Fluid touches the sensor sensing face. Not a true surface mount or immersion style.
Placement
A third category of sensor style is a flush mount. The sensor replaces part of the tank or pipe wall to achieve a more intimate contact between the sensing element and the process fluid. Features are faster time response and less conduction error.
8
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Surface mount sensor assembly that includes the insulation and environmental protection
Placement
The non-intrusive style sensor incorporates an insulated enclosure to shield the surface mounted sensing element from ambient conditions. The assembly is completely waterproof and can be fitted with cable or a connection head.
9
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Thin film sensing element• Small size and low mass works well for many surface mount
applications
Placement
0.17”
Magnified view of a thin film sensing element shows the platinum film trace and the protective blue glass layer. Very small, low mass makes an excellent sensing element for surface measurements.
10
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Accuracy is highly dependent on the installation method and conditions to which the sensor will be exposed. Here are a few installation tips to help insure accuracy.
Use a thermally conductive paste to reduce the measurement error by up to 50%. Also helps to minimize conduction errorsInsulating over the sensor after it is installed will prevent heat loss around the sensor and help isolate the sensor from the ambient conditions. Test data shows that the presence of insulation over the surface sensor can reduce the measurement error by up to 70%.Combining both the conductive paste at the interface and insulation over the top of the sensor can reduce the measurement error by up to 90%.Some designs need protection from liquid waterSelect a location where there is no sunlight, other heat radiation, and minimal air movement. All can affect the measurement accuracy.
Based on test data using 50°C water flowing through a 0.5 inch SST tube at 3 feet per second. Ambient conditions varied between still air and forced airflow over the installation location.
Installation Tips
Installation method can have a large effect on the measurement accuracy. Use of thermally conductive paste, epoxy, silicone rubber or similar material will help speed up the response time and minimize conduction errors.
11
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Surface mount - positivesEasy installationNo flow obstructionLow cost
Placement
12
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Surface mount - negativesRequires insulation for best accuracyMinimal protection from ambient conditionsDifficult to calibrateMeasures pipe surface
Placement
13
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Some typical surface mount applications• Bearing temperature• Small diameter lines• Tube skin in heat exchangers• Small aircraft engine temperature• Exhaust temperature• Corrosive or erosive fluids• Viscous or sticky fluids
Placement
tube
thermocoupleweld pad
14
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Two types of immersion sensors • Direct• Indirect – incorporates a
separable thermowell• Wake frequency and strength
requirements need to be considered
Placement
An immersion sensor overcomes the negatives of the surface mount and in most cases dramatically improves the measurement accuracy. Introducing a sensor into the process does add some additional factors to consider, the most important being immersion length.
15
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Features of direct immersionFast response
• Around 4 second time constant vs. 26 seconds for a surface mount
Low costShort immersionMore accurate than surface mount
LimitationsDurabilityMaintenanceStrength
Placement
Direct immersion of a small diameter sensor gives an accurate measurement at low cost. It is not always possible or desirable though because of maintenance or durability considerations.
16
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Radiation and conduction errors can be controlled by immersion depth
Stem Conduction - Immersion
200°C (High Potential)
25°C Ambient
(low potential)
Large delta T
Flow
Sheath/T-Well acts as conductor
Sensing Element
Of all the error sources, stem conduction seems to cause the most problems especially in tight locations. A thermowell and RTD assembly requires at least 4.5” of immersion to minimize the error. A direct immersion RTD requires at least 10x the probe diameter plus the sensitive length. Most RTDs have a sensitive length of 1”. So for a ¼” diameter RTD, the minimum immersion is 3.5”. Insufficient immersion will allow the ambient conditions to have either a heating or cooling effect on the sensing element. Error magnitude increases as the difference in the ambient temperature and the process temperature increase.
17
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Radiation and conduction errors can be larger• Controlled by adding insulation • Sun shield
Stem Conduction - Surface
200°C (High Potential)
Housing acts as conductor
Sensing Element
Flow
25°C Ambient
(low potential)
Large delta T
insulation
Surface mount sensors are heavily influenced by the ambient conditions. An insulating covering is required to get the best accuracy.
18
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Immersion Error for 200L05ANN135TT302
-5.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Im m ersion Depth (Inches)
Indi
cate
d Er
ror (
% D
elta
T)
Ice Bath
100°C Oil Bath
200°C Oil Bath
Placement
A thermowell and RTD assembly was immersed in a bath to determine the stem conduction at various depths. At 4.5 inches most of the error has disappeared. As you can see the error is mostly independent of the bath temperature used. Our example has a 2.5” immersion so estimating from the graph gives us an error of about 0.45°C which is our second largest error source behind interchangeability.
19
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Placement
Tee mounting
To gain additional immersion depth a tee fitting makes an excellent choice. Flow should be directly at the tip of the sensor to minimize vibration and drag effects.
20
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
ThermowellDurableMaintenanceSensor protectionStrength
LimitationsSlower responseImmersion length
Protection
Adding a thermowell provides protection for the sensor and reduces maintenance. Flow induced vibration is resolved with a thermowell in our sample application.
21
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Thermowell
Protection
This graph shows that our ¼” diameter direct immersion sensor will vibrate due to the 100 fps flow rate. Adding the ¾” NPT thermowell allows a comfortable margin of safety with well over 250 fps capability for the 2.5” immersion length selected.
22
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
OptionsConnection headExtensionAgency approvals
Protection
We’ve protected the internal part of the sensor and now we need to look at the outside.
23
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Connection headsAttach extension wiresProtect sensor from ambient conditions
Protection
A connection head is the best method and provides a convenient place to attach lead wires or to house a local transmitter.
24
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Protection
Numerous styles and materials, from plastic to aluminum, are available. Some carry ratings for use in hazardous atmospheres.
25
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Transmitters
Protection
Heads provide protection for transmitters and local indicators.
26
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Hazardous atmosphere
Protection
Hazardous atmospheres require an RTD and connection head assembly that carry an appropriate rating.
27
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Hazardous atmosphere• One method for surface mount – FM approved immersion sensor
strapped to a pipe with hose clamps. Add insulation to shield from ambient conditions.
Protection
Hazardous atmospheres require an RTD and connection head assembly that carry an appropriate rating. Not many surface mount RTDs are rated for hazardous atmospheres. Fortunately ¼” diameter or smaller RTD or thermocouple that carries a hazardous area rating can be used as a surface mount sensor. A couple of hose clamps and insulation are all that is required for installation.
28
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
OptionsNippleNipple - couplingUnion
• Calibration• Replacement
Protection
A connection head is attached to the thermowell and sensor typically with a pipe nipple. The most versatile is the union connection.
29
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Union• Calibration• Replacement• Orientation• Head temperature
Protection
In addition to making sensor removal easier, the union allows the conduit port to be rotated to line up with the facility wiring. Approximately 3” is a good minimum length for an extension. This insures that the temperature in the head does not overheat from the process. Transmitters and the moisture seal on the sensor can be adversely affected by temperatures over 85°C.
30
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Error BudgetSensor accuracy
– Interchangeability– Matching to transmitter– Thin film or wire wound– Repeatable and stable
Measurement accuracy– Installation– Time response– Control system– Repeatable if ambient conditions are constant
Immersion sensors are more accurate than surface mount
Performance
Accuracy of the sensor and accuracy of the measurement are most times quite different. Sensor accuracy is determined mostly by the manufacturing interchangeability and the style of sensing element. The wire wound style has the widest temperature range and lowest drift. Measurement accuracy includes the sensor accuracy and the installation effects. In addition, time response can be a large factor in the measurement accuracy.
31
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Stability – same for surface or immersion sensors
Definition: The state of being resistant to change or deterioration.
Performance
Change from
Initial ( °C)
0 200 400 600 800 1000
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
500 °C
400°Co
200°C
Long Term Stability (Drift)
Hours at temperature
Stability or long term drift is an important consideration in selecting an RTD for best accuracy. As you can see from the graph, as temperature goes up the drift becomes much more significant. This graph shows some worst case drift estimates for RTDs. Thermocouples may drift faster depending on the conditions it is exposed to.
32
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Cost of inaccuracy
Performance
• Process Fluid: Water• Flow Rate: 50 GPM• Control Temperature: 100 °F• Energy Cost: 2.9¢ / KW-hour
Annual Cost of Energy Per °F Error
$1846 / year
High accuracy insures product quality and efficient use of your energy dollar.
33
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Time Response
This graph shows the relative time response difference of the various types of sensors and installation methods. The direct immersion has the fastest response and the slowest is an RTD and thermowell assembly with a sloppy fit of the RTD into the well. Time response can be a large error if the RTD does not keep up to a rapidly changing process temperature.
34
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Time constant is used as a comparison.• Immersion sensors:
• Tested by measuring time required for a sensor to indicate 63.2% of a step change in temperature when placed in water moving at 3 ft/sec.
• Surface mount:• Tested by attaching sensor to SS pipe (.065” wall), insulated
with 1” of fiberglass, and running water through at 3 ft/secTypical numbers
• Immersion is 2.5 to 8 seconds• Surface mount is 10 to 70 seconds – highly dependent on
sensor style, mounting, and use of heat transfer paste
Performance
35
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Transmitters• Lead wire > 250 feet
(+0.16°F/100 ft)• Accuracy
• Matching• Lead wire
• Robust signal• RFI/EMI
Performance
Adding a transmitter can improve accuracy when a long run of lead wire is required. They also provide a more robust signal that is less susceptible to interference from electro-magnetic or radio frequency interference.
36
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Life cycle cost• Initial cost • Operating efficiency• Product quality• Maintenance costs• Energy• Down time• Troubleshooting• Product loss• Overhead and inventory
Price
The goal is to minimize the total life cycle cost of the measurement point while maximizing performance. Numerous costs need to be considered from the sensor cost to the cost of carrying a spare in inventory.
37
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Careful consideration of the installation method whether a surface mount or immersion will insure a long service life.
Choose the sensor construction style best suited to the measurement
Calibrate at regular intervals to verify accuracy
Service Life
There are many RTDs that have been in service for 20+ years and are still performing within original specifications. To achieve this kind of lifetime and the lowest life cycle cost, careful consideration needs to be given to all the selection factors.
38
© Burns Engineering Surface vs. Immersion Temperature Measurements
Surface mountLow costEasy installationProtection required for ambient conditions
ImmersionBest accuracyConsider wake frequency and strength when selectingRequires sufficient immersion to overcome stem conduction
Summary