Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

download Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

of 81

Transcript of Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    1/81

    1003-9/010 7734-G/2009

    56712/2010

    Amicus Curiae

    NEPRA

    1

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    2/81

    PEPCO/GENCO's WAPDA & M/o W&P

    PEPCO SML PPIB

    NPCCG.M CE WPPO

    GM WPPO

    CRRO, WAPDA Khi

    DD, CRRO CFO

    DM, LPGCL FD, LPGCL CEO, LPGCL

    CEO, GENCO-III

    2

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    3/81

    &

    Young Gen Power

    1-4, 14-17 & 21-24 26-28 & 31

    2011 12-14

    2 8-9-2009

    3

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    4/81

    26-09-2009

    GENCOs

    16/08/2006 ECC 135/9/2006 (ECC)

    3

    21-10-2010 3100/2010

    (PPIB) 1994 4

    16-12-1997

    1997

    (xi) (vi) 1997 2 1997

    1984 1998 (xxvi) PEPCO

    4

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    5/81

    (DISCOs) (NTDC)

    5 () ( )

    ( ) ( ) 1984 /

    ( )

    6

    1997 1997 31

    ( )

    ) 3 1997 7

    7 1997

    (1)

    (4) (2)

    a b

    5

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    6/81

    c d

    e f g

    (1) (2) 3

    (a (b

    (c

    (d

    e f 4

    5

    6

    20 15,16 1997

    1997 2005

    IPPs

    6

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    7/81

    RRP .8

    "Solicitation For Fast Track IPP and Rental Power Projects through

    International Competitive Bidding"

    14-05-2008 59/08/2008 19478MW

    2009 PEPCO

    2009 18110MW 14686 17102MW 12074MW

    ADB 2010-2013

    2009 9 ADBP

    ADBP 7.5%2013 8.1 2009

    2010 21838

    2011 23476

    2012 25185

    2013 26978

    2008-2009

    RPPs 2010 ADBP

    ADBP 2009

    7

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    8/81

    14.05.2008 Presentations

    1973 2006 RPPs

    10

    24

    11

    2004 2002

    (5) (13) 34 48 2007

    355018641100 2962 (6) (10)

    2007

    2005

    LOIs

    9476 MW

    (2590 MW 13591231 (7) (7)

    12066MW (9476+2590) LOIs

    12

    8

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    9/81

    IPPs GENCOs

    06.10.2010

    :

    " 2009

    "

    "

    " www.pepco.gov.pk

    16-03-2012 1 2 3

    9

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    10/81

    4 5

    6

    10

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    11/81

    1994 2012 2010

    3

    11

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    12/81

    1 1994 2012 2010

    3 2

    12

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    13/81

    2

    320072003 1

    1 2

    3

    4

    2008003 5

    6 20082002

    2002 7

    500 8

    1

    13

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    14/81

    2010 2 19-05-2011 3

    CPPA WPPO 42011 2010 2011

    5

    ADB

    GENCO

    20122008 PEPCO

    2009

    20122008

    PEPCO

    14

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    15/81

    13

    ADB 2008

    PEPCO IPPsGENCO PEPCO RPPs IPPS 16.03.2012

    IPPS 2009-2010

    PEPCO2009

    1519MW PEPCO

    RPPs

    15

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    16/81

    RPPs WAPDAGENCO'SPEPCO 14 RPPs

    RPPs 16 .08 .2006

    ECC-135/9/2006 " "

    ECC

    6

    16

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    17/81

    NPGCL (i)

    5 / (ii)

    (iii)

    NPGCL/ 6 8

    16 (F)

    ECC

    ECC

    10-09-2008

    RPPs IPPs a. Proposals for rental power plants would be based on dual fuel (Gas

    and RFO)/single fuel RFO and would be implemented in shortest

    possible time.

    b. Rental Power Plants would be arranged for a period of 3+1 years.

    c. Efforts would be made that the tariff of rental power plants is lower

    than the tariff allowed to IPPs based on similar technology for their first

    ten years.

    d. Mandatory storage of oil for rental power plants would be for ten

    days.

    e. PEPCO would revaluate the sites for the rental power plants on the

    17

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    18/81

    basis of space for oil storage, transportation of oil to the site,

    environmental aspects and power evacuation etc.

    f. PEPCO would prepare a mid term revised forecast for demand and

    supply of power and PPIB would provide necessary input/data to

    PEPCO in respect of prospective IPPs.

    g. Secretaries of Finance and Water & Power along with Managing

    Director, PPRA would review the mechanism of procurement to ensure

    that future delay is avoided and Public Procurement Rules, 2004 areobserved in letter and spirit.

    ECC RPPs PEPRA

    Public Procurement

    Rules, 2004

    2A 29 15

    14 9 (PLD 2010 SC 1109)

    (Constitution Petition No. 50/2011)

    18

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    19/81

    (PLD 2010 SC 759 (PLD 2011 SC SMC NO. 13/2009

    (PLD 1994 SC 693) 619) 16

    27-03-2008 2009 2200MW Fast Track Power Generation Projects

    Balco Employees Union (Regd) Union of India (Air 2002 SC 350)

    (PLD 2006 Sc 697)

    57

    Messrs Elahi Cotton Mills Ibid Balco

    Employees Ibid

    19

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    20/81

    Trail & Error Trail & Error

    Elahi Cotton Ibid Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd 58

    Loard

    Somerrell

    Nottinghamshire County Council v. Secretary of State for the

    Environment [(1986)

    1947

    Statute

    20

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    21/81

    Wednesbury Sense

    Lord Diplock's speech in Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for

    the Civil Service [1984] 3 All ER 935, [1985] AC 374."

    Peter Cau's "An Introduction to Administrative Law"

    PSMC

    Iqbal Haider v. Capital Development Authority (PLD 2006 SC 394),

    Pakistan Steels (PLD 2010 SC 759), HRC No. 4688/06 (PLD 2001 SC

    21

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    22/81

    619), Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of

    India [(1979) 3 SCC 489]; Tata Cellular v. Union of India [(1994) 6 SCC

    651] = (AIR 1996 SC 11); Raunaq International Ltd. v. I.V.R.

    Construction Ltd. (AIR 2004 SC 4299) = [(1999) 1 SCC 492]; Air India

    Ltd. v. Cochin International Airport Ltd. [(2000) 2 SCC 617]; Reliance

    Energy Ltd. v. Maharashtra State Road Development Corp. Ltd.

    [(2007) 8 SCC 1] and judgment dated 24.08.2009 of the Andhra

    Pradesh High Court in Nokia Siemens Networks Pvt. Ltd. v. Union ofIndia.

    .17

    TOOL COMPAY VS. NORRIS [69 U.S.(2 Wall)

    45 (1864)]

    Airport R.D. Shetty v. International Nagar Nigam, Authority of India (AIR 1979 SC 1628).

    22

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    23/81

    Meerut v. Al Faheem Meat Exports (Pvt.) Ltd. [(2007)1 Supreme 704]

    /

    14

    Raman Dayaram Shetty vs. The international Airport Authority of India (AIR 1979 SC 1628)

    Ram & Shyam Co. v. State of Haryana (AIR 1985 SC 1147),

    /

    Haji T.M. Hasan vs. Kerala Financial Corpn. (AIR 1988 SC 157)

    ALSTOM AT / BHAKKI

    23

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    24/81

    14.05.2008

    200/300 B

    MW

    14% 7%

    .18

    2002 19

    24

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    25/81

    Public Procurement Rules 2004 PEPRA

    RPPs

    McManus v. Fortescue [(1907) 2 KB 1]

    PPIB

    RFP

    200MW

    Solicited Unsolicited RPPS

    RPPS

    25

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    26/81

    Status

    COD

    RPP

    26

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    27/81

    27

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    28/81

    RPPsNTDC/CPPA 20 NTDC/CPPANEPRA

    NEPRA/R/PAR-11/CPPA-2006/6213-15 2 7 - 0 7 - 2 0 0 6

    09-10-2006 NEPRA/R/PAR-11/CPPA-2006/6920-22 NPGCL RPPsCPPA

    28

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    29/81

    NEPRA's App l i ca t i on NPGCL i Modification Regulations 1999

    CPPAPPA NPGCL ii NPGCL iii

    NEPRANPGCL RPPS, RSCs

    GENCOs PEPCO 21 2006 M/s General Ekut Power 136M/S Afstom

    M/S Afstom 150 17-1-2007

    "BHIKKI POWER PROJECT

    Place: Bhikki, District Sheikhupura

    Capacity: 136MW (gas based)

    Rental term: 36 months

    Contract amount: USD 103,015,476

    Mobilization Advance: USD 7,211,083

    Agreement date: 18 September, 2006

    Rental revenue received: USD 68,024,477

    Rental revenue loss: USD 34,990990

    Date of Assignment 17 January, 2007

    Effective Date 23 February 2007

    COD Scheduled 23 June 2007

    29

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    30/81

    AchievedUnit III 19 December, 2007

    Unit II 22 January 2008

    [Unit I 02 April 2008]

    Expiry of Agreement: 22 June 2010"

    ECC16-08-2006 22 150ECC-135/9/2006 dated 16-08-2006

    ECC

    Case No.ECC-135/9/2006Dated: 16.08.2006

    150 MW POWER PLANT ATPIRANGHAIB MULTAN ON

    RENTAL BASIS

    150 2006 12

    Proposal

    vide letter 26-08-2006 No.PL-9(3)/2006.

    NGPCL 23 130 150

    15-12-2006NEPRA NEPRA/TRF-63/NPGCL-2006/7951-53

    Decision of the Authority w.r.t. Tariff Petition filed by "Subject:

    Northern Power Generation Company Ltd. (NPGCL) for Determination

    of Tariff for Power Plants on Rental Basis from GE Energy/Alstom

    Power (Case No.NEPRA/TRF-63/NPGCL-2006)- Intimation of Decision

    of Tariff pursuant to Section 31(4) of the Regulation of Generation,

    Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act (XL of 1997)

    Dear Sir,

    30

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    31/81

    Please find enclosed the decision of the Authority (4 pages) in Case

    No.NEPRA/TRF-63/NPGCL-2006.

    2. The determination is being intimated to the Federal Government

    for the purpose of notification of Generation, Transmission and

    Distribution of Electric Power Act (XL of 1997) and Rule 16(11) of the

    National Electric Power Regulatory Authority Tariff (Standards and

    Procedure) Rules, 1998.

    3. Please note that only Order of the Authority at para 9 of thedetermination relating to the Reference Tariff and allowed adjustments

    & indexation needs to be notified in the official gazette. The Order is

    reproduced for the purpose of clarity and is attached herewith.

    DA/AS above.

    Sd/- 15.12.2006

    (Mahjoob Ahmad Mirza)"

    2005 1.10 1.9 Charges

    ECC07-02-2008 IPPs Tarrif RPPs

    IPPs RPPs 1.9 a

    b1.9 bidding 1.10 NTDC PPIB

    Levelized PPIB

    31

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    32/81

    24 2.7194/KWH

    (18.63 billion) 2.161 NPGCL(GENCO- I I I ) II I 2009 2007-2008

    25

    32

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    33/81

    NPGCL ALASTOM BIKKI 150MW GE 92% 26% 39% 816MKWH 1515

    C C P CCP-FOM Charge (Rs/KW/Month) (Rs/KW/Month)

    RPPs NGPCL

    Public Exechequer RPPs

    17/08/2009 ECC 26

    RPPs

    33

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    34/81

    ECC 4 Sovereign GuaranteeGOP IPP (i)

    14%

    5 Unsolicitated Project473MW (ii)

    20/04-2010 CPGCL II-

    RPP 6/4/2010 14%

    II-

    II-

    27

    72.48 7% 14% 10.15

    12/03/2009 7% 17/03/2008 MS Welfare Power International6/04/2010 14%

    GENCOs 14%

    GENCOs: 8/12/2010

    (PPR) 7/12/2010 (i)

    8/12/2010

    34

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    35/81

    GENCO (ii)

    GENCO

    28Karkay-II ADB's

    CODNEPRA 222 MW RSC LOA

    RPP II LOA GENCO

    Karkay-II

    Walter Power International Naudero-I 29 51 MW 2009 16 11.26 US $ 14 80.42US $US $ GENCO (CPGCL) COD

    255,000 PPRA RPPS 30

    2006 WAPDA

    RPPS

    Sr.ASC 31

    35

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    36/81

    ECC Naudero-I

    ICB

    1997 7 NEPRA Cost-plus Sr.ASC

    32 CPGCL PPR WPI

    WPIs Naudaro-II COD WPI Naudero-II 10.03.2011 GENCOS (CPGCL) NEPRA

    Naudero-II WPI

    COD

    CPGCL

    Austria GEP WPI

    PEPRA Naudero-I ICB 42(C)

    RPPs ASC 33

    42(3) RPPs Naudero-I 7 NEPRA

    ICB PPR

    COD CPGCL

    CPGCL/NEPRA

    RPPS

    36

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    37/81

    34 PPRA PPRA ECC

    ECC

    ECC PEPRA PEPRA 17.03.2009 ECC

    PEPRA

    : 42 (C PPRA (Procurement)

    "42. Alternative methods of procurements.- A procuring agency may

    utilize the following alternative methods of procurement of goods,

    services and works, namely:-

    (c) direct contracting.- A procuring agency shall only engage in direct

    contracting if the following conditions exist, namely:-

    (i) the procurement concerns the acquisition of spare parts or

    supplementary services from original manufacturer or supplier:

    Provided that the same are not available from alternative sources;

    (ii) only one manufacturer or supplier exists for the required

    procurement:

    Provided that the procuring agencies shall specify the appropriate fora,

    which may authorize procurement of proprietary object after due

    37

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    38/81

    diligence; and

    (iii) where a change of supplier would oblige the procuring agency to

    acquire material having different technical specifications or

    characteristics and would result in incompatibility or disproportionate

    technical difficulties in operation and maintenance:

    Provided that the contract or contracts do not exceed three years in

    duration;

    (iv) repeat orders not exceeding fifteen per cent of the originalprocurement;

    (v) in case of an emergency:

    Provided that the procuring agencies shall specify appropriate fora

    vested with necessary authority to declare an emergency;

    (vi) when the price of goods, services or works is fixed by the

    government or any other authority, agency or body duly authorized by

    the Government, on its behalf, and

    (vii) for purchase of motor vehicle from local original manufacturers or

    their authorized agents at manufacturer's price."

    35 RPPs

    RPPs

    GENCOs PEPCO

    38

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    39/81

    NEPRA NEPRA 36

    1997 7 2006

    RPPs NEPRA 37 NEPRA reference tariff

    IPPs

    1.10 1.9 371997

    (a)(3)7 1997

    1997 (6)7

    1997 (17)2 31 1997

    (6) 17 (2)

    RPPs RPPs

    I-

    39

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    40/81

    1997

    9 38 RPPs

    II- I-

    COD RPPs II-

    (201 MW 51 MWI- (62 MW)(231.8 MW) COD

    7%

    COD

    39Pakistan Power Resources, Guddu; Pakistan Power Resources,

    Piranghaib, Multan; Techno, Sammundri Road, Faisalabad; Techno

    40

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    41/81

    Project, Sahuwal, Sialkot; Young Gen, Faisalabad; Gulf Rental Power,

    Gujranwala; Independent Power Limited; Kamoki Energy Limited;

    Karkey Karadeniz, Karachi (Karakey-I); Premier Energy; Reshma

    Power Generation, Manga-Raiwind Road; Ruba Power Generation,

    Manga-Raiwind Road; Sialkot Rental Power, Eminabad; Walter Power

    International, Karachi; Abbas Steel; Karkey Karadeniz, Karachi (Karkey

    II); Techno-E-Power (Pvt.) Limited, Sammundri Road, Faisalabad-II;

    Walter Power International, Naudero-I; and Walters PowerInternational, Naudero-II

    40

    ECC 2009-2010

    Unsolicted

    121/15/2009

    41THIRD PARTY EVALUATION BY ADB

    ADB

    RPPs ADB

    6 RPPs (1257mw) RPPs 8

    41

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    42/81

    5 RPPs 9 19 ADB 27.01.2010

    ECC

    RPP

    ECC

    42

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    43/81

    RPPs SOLICITED RPPs

    DISCUSSION OF EFFECTIVE RPPs

    GUDDU (1)

    07.07.2007 110 mwM/s Pakistan US 30

    Power Resources (PPR) and M/s Progas Pakistan Ltd. (PPL) 30 0 3 . 1 1 . 2 0 0 7

    11.11.2007(1) Capacity of 100 MW was changed to 100-125 MW with minimum

    efficiency of 33%.

    (2) Period 2 years was changed to 2, 3 or more.

    (3) Eligibility condition of having similar experience for minimum of 3

    locations was removed.

    (4) Condition of depositing Security of Rs. 10 M or $ 0.17 M, was

    deleted.

    (5) Condition of Penalties for non-availability, delay in installation &

    commissioning or variation in heat rate, was deleted.

    (6) Condition of providing Operational Guarantee worth 10% of Base

    Load Operation Cost for 2 years by the bidder was deleted.

    (7) Process of price evaluation was changed.

    (8) Bidder's responsibility to the extent of Operation and Maintenance

    of equipment and Trouble free base load supply of electricity was

    eliminated.

    43

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    44/81

    (9) Bidder's responsibility to the extent of Transportation of equipment

    to and from the site was eliminated.

    (10) Guarantee for providing 92% of gas fuel was provided.

    11.11.2007 0.17 10

    01.12.2007 30.11.2007

    12 10.12.2007

    M/s Progas Pakistan Ltd., (a)M/s Pakistan Power Resources, and (b)

    M/s Pak Oman Investment Company Karachi. (c)

    01.01.2010 "On the basis of evaluation criteria, the bid offered by M/s Progas

    Pakistan Ltd. as Option-I (125 MV) is lowest in tariff, on the basis of

    Lump sum Contract Price, Rental Charges and Fuel Cost Component.

    "Only M/s Pak Oman Investment Company qualifies the minimum US$

    30 million Net Worth, while others do not.

    "M/s Progas has offered 125 MW at reduced load operation, with other

    option of 135 MW at full load offering an incentive in Rental Rates.

    "Rental Service Contract may be awarded to M/s Progas Pakistan Ltd.

    for installation of 135 MW net capacity on three rental years against

    their guaranteed availability at 92% on gas fuel at proposed site of

    TPS Guddu at 132 KV level.

    In this connection, it is proposed to relax minimum criteria of US$ "

    30 million Net Worth.

    03.02.2008 M/s Pakistan Powe Resources

    44

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    45/81

    "Based on rental charges & guaranteed heat rates offered by the

    bidders, the overall cost (US Cents 7.640 per kWh) offered by M/s

    Pakistan Power Resources is lower as compared to the offer (US

    Cents 7.974 per kWh) of the next higher bidder.

    "The rental value offered by M/s Pakistan Power Resources, at (US

    2.717 per kWh) was 13%, which was lower than that of the rental (US

    Cents 3.133 per kWh) for units of GE at Sheikhupura and PPR at

    Bhikki, already in operation."A penalty clause be included in the contract agreement to penalize

    PPR for failing to achieve the specified/required COD.

    "It was unanimously agreed that offer by M/s Pakistan Power

    Resources was the best offer and was accordingly approved. LOA may

    be issued and the matter submitted to PEPCO, BOD for ratification.

    150MWM/s PPR 06.08.2008 M/s PPR 11.03.2008 Payment Pakistan 23.02.2008

    Power Resources, LLC and Central Power Generation Company Ltd.

    11.12.2008 (CPGCL)

    "Changes were made in the mode of payment through LC.

    "The CPGCL have no right to cancel the contract within initial 8

    months.

    "In case of termination of the agreement by CPGCL, the buyer shall be

    entitled to outstanding rent of 36 months.

    "Maximum drawdown on SBLC during any one calendar month will not

    45

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    46/81

    exceed a sum of US$ 1,872,466.

    05.03.2009

    "Requirement of confirmation of SBLC by a Financial Institution in UK

    or USA in terms of clause 4.5(d) was waived.

    "The seller waived the right to call the SBLC on account of defaults of

    the Buyer, which had occurred prior to issuance of SBLC.

    "Amount of SBLC as mentioned in section 4.5 was reduced from 93%

    (US$ 67,408,766) to 86% (US$ 62,334,988) of the contract price."Down payment was increased from 7% to 14 %.

    "Some amendments were made in the capacity/operation of Units.

    2

    11-10-07

    RPP

    250-300

    43

    24-10-07

    29-10-07 22-11-07 7-11-07

    RFO

    RFO 192MW (net)

    S50MC-C7MN B & W

    RFO GE 11-12-07 Evaluetion Committee

    (1) 04-01-08

    46

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    47/81

    17-03-08

    150MW RPP 192 MW

    Award 24-03-08RPP

    14-09-10 RSCs

    CMA 3992/11

    4 5(vi) 201014 1 CPGCL

    1001, 771/- PPR 2

    (b)

    451,746

    (a)

    (d) 77143/- (c) 5328/- 200,000 (e) 267,494

    NGPCL 44

    2(g) Contract Act, 1872

    "Contract"

    ICB "Unsolicited"

    ICB PPR, 2004 Contract

    47

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    48/81

    12 2004 1 i

    PEPCO ii RPP, 250-300MV 2

    NPGCL 4.S(a) 311-06-09

    4.5(a) 4

    36 Letter of Credit 4.5 (C) 5

    24-11-09 Rental Services fee payments SBLC

    COD LOA 6

    PPR 11,550,000 14,584,990

    "Letter of Credit"

    PPRs 1997 7

    Capcity Cahrges

    48

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    49/81

    Capcity NEPRA13-04-09 Charges

    45.

    NPGCL PEPCO

    / (3)

    (NPGCL)

    50

    46.

    11.10.2007 30

    RFO 88% 15.05.2008

    " 24.10.2007 / 47. 11.10.2007 "

    07.11.2007 / 29.10.2007 04.11.2007 03.11.2007

    (Supply of 20 21.11.2007 SSA sample)

    -

    49

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    50/81

    - 01.01.2008

    RFO Option -I (MAN B&W)

    Fuel cost component PEPCO

    RFO 60%

    30

    15.05.2008

    1.93

    150 MW 132 KV Rental Services Contract

    (LOA) 22.01.2008

    Advance 22.01.2008 LOA

    Sample rent Agreement 14.02.2008 14.02.2008

    Sample rent agreement 14.02.2008

    50

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    51/81

    ADB

    KARKEY KARADENIZ ELEKTRIK (4)

    PPIB 200 MW 48 17.05.2008 ICB

    Walters Power International Karkey Karadeniz Elektrik Uretim A.S RSC 21.10.2008 (Tariff) RFP

    12.05.2009 US$ 79.05 Million 05.12.2008 07.04.2010 08.12.2009 14.08.2009 COD RSC

    23.04.2010 RSC PPIB 49

    Fuel cost Component

    Karkey Karadeniz 20.05.2010

    "Venture into Secure, Profitable & Promising Power Sector of Pakistan

    INVITATION FOR BIDS

    1200 MW Fast Track Private Power Projects

    "Package B:

    Rental Power Project(s) of 200 MW cumulative capacity

    near Karachi.

    Capacity:

    Rental power project(s) including barge-mounted plants of 200 MW

    cumulative power generation capacity can be offered by the bidder(s).

    One or more project proposals/bids will be considered, until the limit of

    200 MW is attained.

    51

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    52/81

    Fuel/Type:

    The bidders may offer projects of any multiple fuel (Residual Fuel

    Oil/Gas/Liquified Natural Gas/Liquified Petroleum Gas), technology

    and type.

    Near Karachi Site:

    Project commissioning:

    Project(s) are required to be operational within six (06) months from

    issuance of Letter of Award (LOA).Term of Project(s):

    The term of the project(s) would be 3-5 years.

    Project Agreement:

    The project agreement/contract for these projects would be in

    accordance with those earlier executed by PEPCO for Rental Projects.

    Evaluation Criteria:

    For evaluation of bids and award under this package, similar approach

    as that for Package-A would be followed, until cumulative capacity of

    200 MW is reached.

    Bidding Process Roadmap:

    "The interested party/parties will be registered with PPIB after paying

    US$ 100 (or Pak Rs. 7000) for each Package and purchase Request

    for Proposal (RFP) after making a non-refundable payment of US$

    2,000 (Pak Rs.140,000) for each Project. The registration process and

    sale of RFP will be completed from 20th May to 19th June 2008.

    "The interested party/parties will submit complete bid in accordance

    with the RFP along with a refundable Bid Bond @ US$ 1,000 per

    megawatt (MW) of proposed Gross (ISO) Capacity of the Project and

    52

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    53/81

    non-refundable bid evaluation fee of US$ 20,000.

    "Payments to be made through Demand Draft/Pay Order drawn in

    favour of PPIB, payable at a bank branch in Islamabad Pakistan or

    through wire transfer.

    "PPIB reserves the right to reject any or all bids without assigning any

    reason thereof."

    Fuel cost component

    XII & XIII M/s Karkey XII/XIII- "ANNEX - B

    Attachment 12 to the Bid Letter

    Proforma XII

    Bidder's Offered Reference Tariff Table

    Rental Power Project

    Reference Tariff Table for Ranking Purpose

    Fuel Year

    Rental Rate ( per kWh) x 1.2

    Total ( per kWh)

    ( per kWh)

    18,6288 6,3500 10,2323 x 1.2 1.

    18,6288 6,3500 10,2323 x 1.2 2.

    18,6288 6,3500 10,2323 x 1.2 3.

    18,6288 6,3500 10,2323 x 1.2 4.

    18,6288 6,3500 10,2323 x 1.2 5.

    Note:

    1.The calculation of Fuel Cost Component and Rental Rate will be

    53

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    54/81

    made according to the Proforma XIII

    2.For conversion of Fuel Cost Component from Pak Rs. To US Cents,

    the conversion rate of 1 US$ = 62 Pak Rs. Shall be used."

    "Attachment 13 to the Bid Letter

    Proforma XIII

    Pricing - Lump Sum Rental Charges, Rental Rate and Reference Fuel

    Cost Component

    a)Pricing - Lump Sum Rental Charges for 60 Months Rental Term.

    Year Fuel (per kWh) x

    1.2

    Rental Rate ( per KWh) Total (per kWh)

    1. 10,2323 x 1.2 6,3500 18,6288

    2. 10,2323 x 1.2 6,3500 18,6288

    3. 10,2323 x 1.2 6,3500 18,6288

    4. 10,2323 x 1.2 6,3500 18,6288

    5. 10,2323 x 1.2 6,3500 18,6288

    XIII Rental Rate Fuel Cost Component 1

    62 Fuel Cost Compoenent 2

    "Attachment 13 to the Bid Letter

    Proforma XIII

    Reference Fuel Cost Component - - 54

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    55/81

    60 (a)

    b) Rental Rate

    The Rental Rate 6,3500 US Cents/kWh based on the Lump Sum

    Rental Charges given in the Table above is calculated using the

    following formula:

    Rental Rate (Cents/kWh) =

    Lump Sum Rental Charges in US Dollars x 100

    Net Capacity in MW x 1000 x Rental Term in years x number of hours

    in year x Guaranteed Availability

    Where:

    Net Capacity of Rental Plant: 231.8 MW (net) at Mean Site Conditions

    Guaranteed Available of Equipment: 93%

    No. of Hours in a year: 8760"

    value

    Per kwh

    50

    55

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    56/81

    13/04/2009 NEPRA 60,000 10

    Independent Power (pvt.) LTD Eminabad 5 PPIB 50 MW RPP100 MW IPP 51

    26/09/2008

    (a) Alstom Power Rentals for 200 MW project near 220 KV

    Ludewala - Sargodha Grid Station

    (b) Gulf Rental Power for 80.5 MW project adjacent to 132 Kv

    Eminabad - Gujranwala Grid Station

    (c) Independent Power Pvt. Ltd. for 220.97 MW project near 132 KV

    Gojra - Faisalabad Grid Station

    Letters of Award (LOA) 20-12-2008 PPIB 13/04/2009 NEPRA

    Commercial Operat ion Date 19/09/2009 29-04-2010 31-12-2009 (COD)

    ICB 24-01-2009 52

    Fast Track Rental Power Project 18-02-2009

    PPIB IPPs (iii) NEPRA

    56

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    57/81

    (a)analysis of life-cycle investment

    the projects

    ICBIPPs RFP (b)

    NEPRA (c)

    ICB RPPs 24-01-2009 PPIB 53 NEPRA

    NEPRA20-02-2009

    Fast Track Projects (i)

    PPIB IPPs (ii)

    Rental Tarrif GOP (iii)

    13-04-2009 NEPRA Section NEPRA

    NEPRA 31(2)(a),(c)&(d) of the NEPRA Act

    57

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    58/81

    Consumers

    Electric Power Industry

    13-04-2009 NEPRA

    (i)

    NEPRARFP ICB (ii)

    NEPRA (iii) 60,000 10 (iv)

    27-01-2010 IPL, RSC GENCO

    54

    / (i) /

    86 3 PRPCO (ii)

    3 30 7% (iii)

    7% (a)4.5 (iv)

    30 30 7%

    58

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    59/81

    7% 30

    36 (C) 4.5 (v)

    24-11-2009 2 SBLC

    11.9 7% 13-04-2009 (vi) COD 19-02-2009 COD 31-12-2009 (vii)

    COD 29-04-2009 NEPRA RFO (viii)

    / NEPRA (ix)

    6

    PEPCO 50 MW 55 I C B P P I B

    8 10 23-12-2008 /

    14-04-2009 / 55.27 06-09-2009 RSC 29-05-2009

    31-12-2009 COD 03-10-2009 NEPRA COD

    59

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    60/81

    / RPPs / NEPRA 56

    NEPRA 10 Sr. ASC

    3 40 60 25

    / Unit Cost PE KWH

    Gas HSFO (Residual Fuel Oil)RFO RPPs 57 RFO

    Rs. 26,000

    PFO

    Rs. 26,000

    RFO

    RPPs KWH

    I-

    60

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    61/81

    61

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    62/81

    62

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    63/81

    63

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    64/81

    64

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    65/81

    RPPs kWh / NTDC RPPs

    58

    PEPCO

    59231 14.57 48.33 201

    7 1997 NEPRA 60

    IPPS

    RECOVERY FROM SAHUWAL, SIALKOT/SUMMUNDRI ROAD,

    65

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    66/81

    FAISLABAD

    RPPs RPPS 61

    Techno-E COD Power Shauwal, SialkotTechno E Power Sahuwal, Sialkot-RPP, 150MW ICB

    11.55 165 RPP 250-300MW

    letter No. CEO/MZG/Rental/13481-84 dated 24.12.2010 7 GENCO RSC NEPRA NPGCL ICB RPP RSC

    Techno E PowerPEPCO 7 18.9 14 135

    30-10-2009 Tarrif

    01-04-09

    26-02-2008

    COD 30-10-2009 LOA 135 COD 11-06-2010 60MW 30-07-2009 COD

    M/s Techno COD NEPRA Power) Shomal Sialkot

    RPPs Techno Sahuwal FIA

    2011

    14-01-2011 62 Techno E Power Showal 17-01-2011

    66

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    67/81

    18-01-2011 300892500/-1701839 781357,500/-171838

    GENCO

    4781/11 5002/11 63

    "Under the circumstances it is most respectfully prayed that this August

    Court may graciously be pleased to pass appropriate orders based on

    facts mentioned in the body/grounds of instant petition and Site Statusof the plant/machinery submitted by NPGCL and may pass direction to

    NPGCL/WAPDA to refund the Advance money with markup received

    7% Additional amount as per facts beside payment of remained 7%

    Additional amount as per RSC/Amendment and also to comply with

    notice of default and to fulfill all terms and conditions of the contract in

    order to enable that petitioner company to generate and smooth

    functioning of the plant to produce and supply electricity in Public

    interest.

    Further prayed to Declare that the submitting of false statement

    contrary to the facts regarding import of machinery and plant in the

    name of NPGCL and storage at WAPDA warehouse at site, is a case

    of abuse of official powers and exercise of authority arbitrarily and with

    ulterior motives and the concerned responsible of NEPRA succeeded

    in obtaining favorable order from this August Court on 13.01.2011

    which caused heavy injury and loses to the Petitioner Company and

    resulted in heavy Miscarriage of justice and have been prima-facie

    guilty of abusing of the process of this Court and are liable to be

    67

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    68/81

    prosecuted."

    RPPs 64

    TECHNO E Power GENCOS

    Techno E Power 65

    RECOVERY FROM M/S YOUNG GEN

    Ms.

    Naudero-II

    GUDDU

    66

    COD 1.26 Young Gen

    2006 67

    2002 1994

    IPPS

    68

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    69/81

    2006 16ECC

    150 ECC-135/9/06 192

    2008 27

    68 1067 PEPCO 2257

    1257 ADB

    69

    PEPCO

    70

    2.3 Request of Proposal Letter of Award

    4.5(a)

    36 Standby Letter of Credit

    60

    69

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    70/81

    71

    PEPRA ENAA, ICE, FIDIC

    72 6036 (GENCOs)

    Standby Letter of Credit (SBLC) 35% SBLC

    2008

    11

    RSC

    SBLC

    SBLC

    (COD)

    26

    73

    6036 14

    70

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    71/81

    Withholding Tax Witholding Tax GENCOs

    20=6+14

    RSCs PPIB (LOAs) (RFP) 74 Bidder/Sponsor (2.3) GENCO's

    LOA (PPIB) RSC 5.4 5.3

    "4.5 Payment Terms and establishment of Letter of Credit-

    a. the SELLER is eligible to obtain in advance a Down Payment

    amounting to US$ [_______] i.e. 7% of Lump Sum Contract Price

    for the Term of the Rental Services Contract (the "Down

    Payment"), on submission of a bank guarantee valid until 30 days

    after the Target Commercial Operations Date, in a form "A". the

    aforesaid Down Payment amount of US$[________]shall be

    deducted, in [36-60] equal installments of US$ [_______] each,

    from the monthly rent payable to the SELLER by the Buyer. Buyer

    shall release 7% Down Payment to be paid within ten (10) Days

    after submission of Advance Payment Bank Guarantee by the

    SELLER within five (5) days from the date of signing of this

    71

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    72/81

    Contract.

    b. The Lump Sum Contract Price as defined in Section 4.1 less

    the 7% Down Payment will be divided into [thirty six -sixty] (36-60)

    equal installments (the "Monthly Rental Services Fees") . From

    and after the occurrence of Commercial Operation Date, the

    SELLER shall submit an invoice to BUYER for Monthly Rental

    Service Fee payment, on the 15th Day of each Rental Month. Uponconfirmation by BUYER of the amount payable against such

    invoice net of any disputed amount, if any, to the operating bank

    issuing the 'Letter of Credit' the SELLER shall draw on the 'Letter

    of Credit', for such confirmed amount as anytime on 30th Day or

    next business Day thereafter, following the Day the invoice is

    delivered to BUYER."

    6036 7% 75 (PPR)

    (LOA) (PPIB) (GENCOS) 7%

    7%GENCOS GENCOs GENCOs

    (GENCO)(RFP) GENCOs(LOA)

    GENCOs (GENCO)

    72

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    73/81

    76 Financial Bill, 2008

    49 5-6-2006 SRO No. 567(1)/2006

    : Sammundri Rental Power Project (RPP). (1)Reshma Rental Power Project (RPP). (2)

    Gulf Rental Power Project (RPP). (3)

    Guddu Rental Power Project (RPP). (4)

    Naudero-I Rental Power Project (RPP). (5)

    Sahuwal Rental Power Project (RPP) (6)

    Karkay Rental Power Project (RPP). (7)

    Sheikhupura Rental Power Project (RPP) (Re-exported). (8)

    Bhikki Rental Power Project (RPP) (Re-exported.) (9)

    CED/FED / Rs. 410,169,668/-

    Stand By Moblization 7% Letter of Credit

    Advance

    77 73

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    74/81

    Stand by Letter of Credit Stand by Letter of Credit 7%

    SBLC

    5 35%

    7% SBLC II I 13 RFP

    7%+7%=14%

    78

    RPPs ADB

    14%7% ADB Invitation

    ensure

    14% 9RFPs

    (reference value) 14% 79

    74

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    75/81

    RPPs 80

    6% Dawn Payment 7%-14%

    [Karkey: Rs.35/- to Rs.50/-; Gulf:Rs.18/- to kWh 24 mw120 RPPs Rs.19/- and Naudero-I: Rs.12/- to Rs.19/-, ]NEPRA 7 1997

    Consumer NEPRA NEPRA

    NTDC

    75

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    76/81

    2008 2006 81 RPPs

    76

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    77/81

    PEPCO,JENCO, 1999

    RPPs NEPRA

    Rs.8,698.46 811.605mkWh Bhikki RPP 82 13,941.82 1520.420mkWhSharaqpur RPP

    RPP 6 9 2008 RPPs

    Techno Sahuwal, Guddu, Reshma, YoungGen

    Karkey,Gulf and Naudero-II and Techno Sammundri ,

    down payment Nadero-I 48.33mwKarkey

    51MW 9.16MW 1 231MW 62MW 50.08MW

    14.58 PIRANGHAB MULTAN Reshma

    201.3MW 15MW

    Karkery RPPS Noudero-1 18.19% 35.50%

    RPPs 10.9.08 Ecc 12.18% 10 IPPs

    120MW RPPs Ecc

    KARKEY

    RPPs Karkeh

    77

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    78/81

    Sharagpn BhakkiNedro-11 Nedro-1Reshma

    6878 Rs.8,689,224000/- 83Rs.445,496,000/- RPPs 224

    84 GENCOs RPPs I

    IPPs IPPs

    IPPs GENCOs II

    78

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    79/81

    RPPs II- I- III

    PPRA/ (open competition)

    RPPs (void ab initio)

    RPPs 9 19 ABD IV COD RPPs 6 9

    GULF I- Karki RPPs GULF

    PPR COD

    RSCs RPPs V CODRPPs

    RPPs

    7 GENCOs VI

    RPPs 14 COD RPPs

    RPPs VII

    7 1997 61 51 81 31 GULF Karki Rs.18-19 Rs.35-52 1

    79

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    80/81

    NTDC fuel cost component 2011

    overhead

    Regulation of Generation, Transmission and 24 9 Distribution of Power Act, 1997,

    VIII 1997

    RPPs 2008 2006 IXDown Payment

    1997 249 14% 7% 7

    1999

    RPPs PPIB GENCOs X

    sub-paragraph No.III, IX, X XI

    Amicus Curiae 85

    MNA 24 9

    80

  • 7/29/2019 Supreme Court of Pakistan's verdict on Rental Power Project Corruption [UrduTranslation]

    81/81