SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority...

35
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] WEEKLY LIST No. 9 OF 2021 FROM : 16-03-2021 To 18-03-2021 COURT NO. : 5 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI REGULAR HEARING SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate 1 C.A. No. 1638/2006 XVII-A M/S. LAFARGE INDIA LIMITED RADHA SHYAM JENA Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD Connected SLP(C) No. 8909/2020 XI KESAR ENTERPRISES LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN Versus COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE NOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1] FOR FOR APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINAL VAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT ON IA 68698/2020 FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 131504/2020 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 3275/2021 Connected C.A. No. 18008/2017 III M/S. MANIKGARH CEMENT K. V. MOHAN Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE Connected C.A. No. 18007/2017 III M/S. MANIKGARH CEMENT K. V. MOHAN Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE Connected C.A. No. 3976/2007 XVII-A RAMALA SAHKARI CHINI MILLS LTD THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH Versus COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. V. BALARAM DAS, B. KRISHNA PRASAD Connected S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 1960/2017 XI M/S. D.S.M. SUGAR MANSURPUR, (A UNIT OF THE DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS LTD., DHAMPUR, DIST. BIJNOR) RAJESH KUMAR Versus COMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUT - I FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2017 Connected SLP(C) No. 621/2017 XI KESAR ENTERPRISES LIMITED` CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[P-1] Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, MEERUTII B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1] Connected SLP(C) No. 37978/2016 XI M/S D S M SUGAR ASMOLI RAJESH KUMAR Versus

Transcript of SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority...

Page 1: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 9 OF 2021 FROM : 16-03-2021 To 18-03-2021

COURT NO. : 5HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No. 1638/2006

XVII-AM/S. LAFARGE INDIA LIMITED RADHA SHYAM JENAVersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 8909/2020XI

KESAR ENTERPRISES LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR FOR APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINALVAKALATNAMA/OTHER DOCUMENT ON IA 68698/2020 FOR STAY APPLICATIONON IA 131504/2020 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 3275/2021

ConnectedC.A. No. 18008/2017III

M/S. MANIKGARH CEMENT K. V. MOHAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE

ConnectedC.A. No. 18007/2017III

M/S. MANIKGARH CEMENT K. V. MOHAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE

ConnectedC.A. No. 3976/2007XVII-A

RAMALA SAHKARI CHINI MILLS LTDTHROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH

VersusCOMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. V. BALARAM DAS, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.1960/2017XI

M/S. D.S.M. SUGAR MANSURPUR, (AUNIT OF THE DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLSLTD., DHAMPUR, DIST. BIJNOR)

RAJESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUT - IFOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2017

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 621/2017XI

KESAR ENTERPRISES LIMITED` CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX,MEERUTII

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 37978/2016XI

M/S D S M SUGAR ASMOLI RAJESH KUMAR

Versus

Page 2: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,MEERUT-II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 2358/2017XI

KESAR ENTERPRISES LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4946/2016III-A

M/S.THE KISAN SAHKARI CHINI MILLSLTD. RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUT - I

ConnectedSLP(C) No.4144-4146/2016XI

M/S D S M SUGAR ASMOLI (A UNIT OFDHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS LTD.) RAJESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,MEERUT-II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5237/2009XVII-A

THE KISAN SHAHKARI CHINI MILLSLTD. THROUGH M.D PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH

VersusCOMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 202-204/2016III-A

M/S. MONNET SUGAR LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusCOMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUT - I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 18005/2017III

M/S. MANIKGARH CEMENT K. V. MOHAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE

ConnectedC.A. No. 18006/2017III

M/S. MANIKGARH CEMENT K. V. MOHAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 9077/2020XI

KESAR ENTERPRISES LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 9053/2020XI

KESAR ENTERPRISES DISTRICTBAREILLY (UP) CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.70593/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 9040/2020XI

KESAR ENTERPRISES DISTRICTBAREILLY CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.70410/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 8918/2020XI

KESAR ENTERPRISES LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

Versus

Page 3: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2443/2007XVII-A

M/S PRISM CEMENT LTD. THROUGHSH. J.P. RATHI PRESIDENT(COMMERCIAL AND LIAISON)

RAJESH KUMAR

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE

ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA, B. KRISHNAPRASAD

FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 3/2010ConnectedC.A. No. 2444/2007XVII-A

M/S. PRISM CEMENT LTD. RAJDEEP RAJESH KUMAR

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE B. V. BALARAM DAS, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 2445/2007XVII-A

M/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIATHROUGH ITS SR. MANAGER SH. B.N.AGRAWAL

M. P. DEVANATH

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASADFOR ON IA 15977/2007

ConnectedC.A. No. 4704/2007XVII-A

THE KISAN COOPERATIVE SUGARFACTORY LTD THROUGH GENERALMANAGER

PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH

VersusCOMMISSIONER CENRAL EXCISE B. V. BALARAM DAS, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 3747/2007XVII-A

THE KISAN COOPERATIVE SUGARFACTORY LTD. THROUGH GENERALMANAGER

PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH

VersusCOMMR.CEN.EXCISE-I B. V. BALARAM DAS, B. KRISHNA PRASADFOR ON IA 2/2007

ConnectedC.A. No.5955-5956/2007XVII-A

M/S LAFAGE INDIA PVT. LTD. THROUGHITS SR. MANAGER (LOGISTICS) RADHA SHYAM JENA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedSLP(C) No.4537-4538/2008XVII-A

M/S LAFARGE INDIA LIMITEDTR.SR.MANAGER THR. ITS SR.MANAGER (LOGISTICS)

RADHA SHYAM JENA

VersusCOMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE

ConnectedC.A. No.6126-6129/2012XVI

M/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA M. P. DEVANATH[P-1]

Versus

COMMR.OF CENTRALEXCISE,JHARKHAND ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.6130-6132/2012XVI

M/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. M. P. DEVANATH[P-1]

Versus

COMMR.OF CENTRALEXCISE,JHARKHAND ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6133/2012XVI

M/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. M. P. DEVANATH[P-1]

VersusCOMMR.OF CENTRALEXCISE,JHARKHAND ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

Page 4: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No. 6135/2012XVI

M/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA M. P. DEVANATH[P-1]

VersusCOMMR.OF CENTRALEXCISE,JHARKHAND ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6125/2012XV

M/S HINDUSTAN ZINC LTD. M. P. DEVANATH[P-1]

VersusCENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONER OFCENTRAL EXCISE JAIPUR II AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6134/2012XVII-A

M/S MAIHAR CEMENT UNIT NO-2 RAJESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ANIL KATIYAR, B. KRISHNA PRASADFOR ON IA 9368/2009 FOR ON IA 39792/2009

ConnectedC.A. No. 3520/2008XVII-A

THROUGH ITS DGM (FINANCE) M. P. DEVANATH

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,RAIPUR B. KRISHNA PRASAD

FOR ON IA 1/2008ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15616/2008XVII-A

M/S LAFARGE INDIA PVT. LIMITED RADHA SHYAM JENA[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 14206/2008XVII-A

M/S. LAFARGE INDIA PVT.LTD THR. ITSSR. EXECUTIV (ACCOUNTS ANDCONTROL)

RADHA SHYAM JENA

VersusCOMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHATTISGARH B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 6411/2008XV

M/S ADITYA CEMENT LTD. VIKAS SINGH JANGRA[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEJAIPUR AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 5896/2008XVII-A

THE KISAN SHAHKARI CHINI MILLSLTD. THROUGH ITS G.M. PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH

VersusCOMMISIIONER CENRAL EXCISE

ConnectedC.A. No. 5894/2008XVII-A

THE KISAN SHAHKARI CHINI MILLSLTD PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH

VersusCOMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE

ConnectedC.A. No. 2800/2009XVII-A

M/S.CENTURY CEMENT THROUGH ITSSR. VICE PRESIDENT (FINANCE)SHRIN.M. SINGHVI

RAJESH KUMAR

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE

ConnectedC.A. No. 6136/2012XV

M/S ADITYA CEMENT LTD. VIKAS SINGH JANGRA[P-1]

VersusCENTRAL EXCISE JAIPUR II AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1877/2010XVII-A

M/S VIKRAM CEMENT CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[P-1]

VersusCOMMR.OF CEN.EXC. INDORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

Page 5: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No. 6142/2010IX

M/S LLOYDS METALS ANDENGINEERING LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADFOR ON IA 74323/2011

ConnectedC.A. No. 10824/2010XII

M/S MADRAS CEMENTS LTD. THR. ITSASSISTANT GENERALMANAGER(LEGAL)

PRABHA SWAMI

VersusCOMMR.OF CEN.EXC.MADURAI B. KRISHNA PRASADFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2010

ConnectedC.A. No.6116-6124/2012III

SINTEX INDUSTRIES LTD. A COMPANYINCORPORATED UNDER THECOMPANIES ACT 1956 THROUGHCOMPANY SECRETARYVersusCOMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISEAHMEDABAD III B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 25833/2015XI

M/S DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS LTD RAJESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXICSE,MEERUT-II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 549/2016XI

M/S KESAR ENTERPRISES LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

VersusCOMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 547/2016XI

M/S. L.H. SUGAR FACTORIES LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,MEERUT - II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 551/2016XI

M/S. L.H. SUGAR FACTORIES LTD. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,MEERUT - II B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.10943-10944/2016III-A

M/S RATHI STEEL AND POWER LTD. DHANANJAY GARG

Versus

COMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS, CENTRALEXCISE AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

LIST FOR MODIFICATION ON IA 84785/2019ConnectedSLP(C) No. 27610/2017XI

AVADH SUGAR AND ENERGY LTD PANKAJ BHAGAT

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1465/2018IV-C

COMMISSIONER CUSTOMS CENTRALEXCISE AND SERVICE TAX BILASPURRAIPUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SINGHAL ENTERPRISES PVT LTD PRAVEENA GAUTAM[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 9062/2020XI

KESAR ENTERPRISES LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

Page 6: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.70712/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 9001/2020XI

KESAR ENTERPRISES LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.69906/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 9000/2020XI

KESAR ENTERPRISES LTD. BAREILLY CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.69905/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILINGAFFIDAVIT

2 C.A. No. 8829/2010XVII

HAR NARAYAN TEWARI (D) THR. LRS.AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[P-1]

VersusCANTONMENT BOARD,RAMGARHCANTONM.. AND ORS. MADHURIMA TATIA[R-1], [R-2]

FOR ON IA 70392/2009 FOR ON IA 61341/2010

3 C.A. No.3646-3647/2017III-A

HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LIMITED T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS

VersusKRISHNA DULARI (D) THR LRS. ANDORS.

ANURAG KISHORE, GUNNAMVENKATESWARA RAO

4 C.A. No. 3548/2017XIV-A

M/S K.P.MOZIKA R. C. KAUSHIKVersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], , [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4658/2013XIV-A

MOTIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 4657/2013XIV-A

M/S ALI BROTHERS ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 3580/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S ALI BROTHERS AND ORS. AND ORS. ANIL SHRIVASTAV, SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4],[R-5], [R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 383/2013XIV-A

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED HRISHIKESH BARUAH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 9291/2012XIV-A

M/S. P.K.AGARWALA MOHAN PANDEY[P-1]

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8715/2012XIV-A

M/S. D.P AGARWAL MOHAN PANDEY, [P-1]

Versus

Page 7: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5

O.N.G.C. LTD. AND ORS.KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], B.KRISHNA PRASAD[R-4], [R-5], SHUVODEEPROY[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8714/2012XIV-A

M/S J.K JAIN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8710/2012XIV-A

M/S. R.P. KAKOTI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAMAND ORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8705/2012XIV-A

M/S DIPAK MECH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4660/2013XIV-A

MOTIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 4659/2013XIV-A

MOTILIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVEDIRECTOR EASTERN REGION ONGCNAZIRA AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 4661/2013XIV-A

MOTIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 3579/2017XIV-A

MRIDUL KUMAR ADHYAPAK RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. ANDORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3578/2017XIV-A

M/S PURANA AMULAPATTY JUBAKSOMABAI SAMITY LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3577/2017XIV-A

M/S BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEYCONSTRUCTION AND SUUPLIERSREPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRIMRIDUL KUMAR ADH

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM FINANCEDEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY THECOMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TOTHE GOVERNMEN AND ORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3575/2017XIV-A

M/S. PROSENJIT DUTTA RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. CORPORATE LAW GROUP, SHUVODEEP ROY,KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

Page 8: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No. 3576/2017XIV-A

M/S BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEY CONST.AND SUPPLIERS RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY, KAMLENDRA MISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3574/2017XIV-A

M/S. RANAJIT BHUYAN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRA MISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3573/2017XIV-A

M/S BISWAJIT DUTTA RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM FINANCEDEPARTMENT AND ORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4662/2013XIV-A

MOTLIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 8693/2012XIV-A

M/S ROBIN BORDOLOI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7954/2012XIV-A

M/S SITARAM ENERGY AND LOGISTICSLTD. R. C. KAUSHIK[P-1]

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3557/2017XIV-A

M/S ECOS ENGINEERS SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO.LTD . ANDORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3554/2017XIV-A

M/S D.C.JAIN REPRESENTED BY ITSPARTNER SHRI DHARAM CHAND JAIN JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3549/2017XIV-A

M/S. SITARAM ENERGY AND LOGISTICSLTD. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPN LTD .AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3551/2017XIV-A

M/S D.C.JAIN REPRESENTED BY ITSPARTNER SHRI DHARAM CHAND JAIN R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3552/2017XIV-A

SANJIB KAKATY R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO. LTD. ANDORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3556/2017XIV-A

M/S MOTLIB ALI SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

Page 9: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No. 3558/2017XIV-A

M/S D.P.AGARWALA R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3553/2017XIV-A

M/S PURBANCHAL TRANSPORT PROP.SHRI PURANJOY BARUAH R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3555/2017XIV-A

M/S K.C.CHHAWACHARTYA R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3559/2017XIV-A

M/S. NAGALAND TRANSPORT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO.LTD . ANDORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3565/2017XIV-A

PURBANCHAL TRANSPORT R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 3572/2017XIV-A

M/S JYOTI PRASAD BORGOHAINTHROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR. JYOTIPRASAD BORGOHAIN (DEAD) TH. LRS.AND ORS.

ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPN.LTD.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI, SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No.3566-3569/2017XIV-A

GHANA GOGOI AND ORS. R. C. KAUSHIK

Versus

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.FOR ON IA 64174/2012

ConnectedC.A. No. 3571/2017XIV-A

M/S. NAGALAND TRANSPORT CO-OPSOC.LTD. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO.LTD. ANDORS. PRERNA MEHTA, SHUVODEEP ROY[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3570/2017XIV-A

M/S. N.K.SHARMA AND ORS. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORP. LTD. ANDORS.

ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA, SHUVODEEPROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3564/2017XIV-A

M/S B.K.MOZIKA R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3563/2017XIV-A

M/S DIPAK NATH SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

Page 10: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No. 3562/2017XIV-A

M/S P.M.AGARWALLA SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3560/2017XIV-A

M/S. JAY KUMAR JAIN SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3550/2017XIV-A

DIPAK NATH R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3561/2017XIV-A

M/S. SHIV KUMAR AGARWALLA SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

5 C.A. No. 8275/2013IV-A

M/S. UNITED BREWERIES LIMITED A. RAGHUNATHVersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8277/2013IV-A

M/S. UNITED BREWERIES LIMITED A. RAGHUNATH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8276/2013IV-A

M/S. UNITED BREWERIES LIMITED A. RAGHUNATH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

6 C.A. No. 614/2013III-A

M/S PRATAP PHARMACEUTICALS AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. SECRETARYFINANCE CIVIL SECRETARIAT AND ORS. ANKIT GOEL[R-1]

7 C.A. No. 5844/2010IX

C.I.T-3.MUMBAI B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S DWARKAPRASAD ANILKUMARINV.CO.P.LD THR. MANAGER. BINU TAMTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 5352/2010IX

C.I.T-III,MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S STERLITE COPPER ROLLING MILLSP.LTD. THR. MANAGING DIRECTOR BINU TAMTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 5346/2010IX

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. STERLITE COOPER ROLLINGMILLS P. LTD BINU TAMTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8596/2010IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S PRAVIN NAVIN INVESTMENT ANDTRADING CO. (P) LTD. BINU TAMTA

Page 11: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5

8 C.A. No. 3453/2012XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI VI B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusVISHNU AND CO. PVT. LTD. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

9 C.A. No. 14013/2015XIV-A

C.I.T CENTRAL,DELHI ANIL KATIYARVersusMOHAN MEAKIN LTD. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

10 C.A. No.2029-2030/2012III-A

M/S. NARAIN AUTOMOBILES, LUCKNOW T. MAHIPAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,LUCKNOW ANIL KATIYAR

11 C.A. No. 8605/2011XI-A

M/S. SAKTHI METAL DEPOT R. N. KESWANIVersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

12 C.A. No. 4195/2011III

RAMANBHAI GOJIYA TANDEL POWEROF ATTORNEY KAVITA JHA, [P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX,VALSAD AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS, [CAVEAT], ANIL KATIYAR

13 C.A. No. 4197/2011III

VALLABHBHAI MADHAVBHAI .TANDELTHR.POA D.J.TANDEL P. V. SARAVANARAJA, [P-1], [P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX,VALSAD AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR, , B. V. BALARAM DAS[CAVEAT]

14 C.A. No. 4196/2011III

MAHESH D.THAKKAR (DEAD) THROUGHLRS. KAMALABEN MAHESHCHANDRATHAKAR

P. V. SARAVANARAJA[P-1], [P-2]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX. ANDANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[CAVEAT], ANIL KATIYAR

15 C.A. No. 2745/2012IV-A

M/S UNITED BREWERIES LIMITED A. RAGHUNATHVersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6642/2011IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BANGALORE B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusM/S UNITED BREWERIES (HOLDINGS)LTD. A. RAGHUNATH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3629/2011IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX,BANGALORE B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusM/S UNITED BREWERIES LTD. A. RAGHUNATH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.2746-2747/2012IV-A

M/S. UNITED BREWERIES LIMITED A. RAGHUNATH

Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 2744/2012IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXBANGALORE ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S UNITED BREWERIES LTD. A. RAGHUNATH[R-1], [R-1]

16 C.A. No.7758-7759/2011XIV-A

ECS LIMITED KAVITA JHA

Versus

Page 12: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS

ConnectedC.A. No.7760-7761/2011XIV-A

ECS LTD., NEW DELHI KAVITA JHA

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.7762-7763/2011XIV-A

ECS LTD NEW DELHI KAVITA JHA

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22193/2013IV-B

C.I.T.-1 AMRITSAR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BATALA COOPERATIVE SUGARMILLS LTD. BADRI PRASAD SINGH

Service is complete. List along with main matters.ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22192/2013IV-B

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. GURDASPUR COOPERATIVE SUGARMILLS LTD. PANIAR BADRI PRASAD SINGH

Service is Complete. List along with main matters.17 C.A. No. 5088/2011

XIV-AVAN OARD ACZ INDIA LTD KAVITA JHAVersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVI

ConnectedC.A. No. 5089/2011XIV-A

C.I.T,NEW DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusVAN OORD ACZ INDIA P.LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 10479/2012XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVAN OORD ACZ INDIA P.LTD KAVITA JHA

18 C.A. No. 5073/2011IV-A

KHODAY INDIA LIMITED SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[P-1]VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BANGALORE AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

19 C.A. No. 3597/2012XIV-A

KUNTI DEVIVersusDEEP KUMAR (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA[R-2], [R-3]

20 C.A. No.8075-8076/2010XII

AMBALAVANAR TRUST BOARDTR.TRUSTEE BHARGAVA V. DESAI[P-1]

VersusK.THIRUNAVUKKARASU MUDALIYARAND ORS.

KARUNAKAR MAHALIK[R-1], NARESHKUMAR[R-2], T. HARISH KUMAR[R-3]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15148/2011XII

R. PARTGIBAN AND ANR. RAKESH K. SHARMA

VersusAMBALAVANAR TRUST . AND ORS. GAUTAM NARAYAN[CAVEAT]and IA No.120464/2017-IA FOR BRINGING LRS ON RECORD ALONG WITHAFFIDAVIT and IA No.120470/2017-IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINALDEATH CERTIFICATE OF PETITIONER NO 2 and IA No.120473/2017-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. and IA No.120477/2017-IA FOR SETTING ASIDE ABATEMENTAGAINST THE DECEASED and IA No.120479/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING(Case is to be listed alongwith CA 8075-8076/2010)

Page 13: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 521 Crl.A. No. 10/2011

II-BHARJINDER SINGH SANJAY JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 371/2013II-B

MANJIT SINGH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1][AMICUSCURIAE]

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA, [R-1]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.2787-2788/2016II-B

SATWANT SINGH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 5355/2016 FOR CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN REFILING ON IA 5359/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 6126/2016

22 C.A. No. 8826/2011IV-A

GURAPPA AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusTHE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITIONOFFICER

23 C.A. No. 1958/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]VersusANU MEHRA MOHINDER JIT SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 11426/2012XIV

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI

VersusVIKAS JAIN AND ANR.

24 C.A. No.10159-10161/2010III

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.AHMEDABAD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S URMIN PRODUCTS P.LTD. . ANDORS. M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No. 5146/2015XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHANDIGARH B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S. FLAKES-N-FLAVOURZ M. P. DEVANATH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 959/2019XVII-A

C.CE S.T. ALWAR B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusTARA CHAND NARESH CHAND SIDDHANT BUXY[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and IA No.170411/2018-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.170409/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 6938-2019XVII-A

C.C.E AND S.T. JAIPUR I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S A.M PRODUCTS AJAY CHOUDHARY[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and IA No.41836/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IANo.41835/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 14581-2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX MEERUT II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SOM PAN PRODUCTS PVT. LTD M. P. VINOD[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.84500/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.84501/2019-STAY APPLICATION

ConnectedDiary No. 44912-2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODSAND SERVICE TAX EXCISE ANDCUSTOMS

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

Page 14: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5KAIPAN PAN MASALA PVT. LTD. ANDORS. KISHAN DATTA[R-1]

IA No.21656/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTand IA No.21655/2020-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.21653/2020-CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL and IA No.21654/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS

ConnectedDiary No. 2810-2020XVII-A

M/S DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENOIDAIA No.45280/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTand IA No.45283/2020-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.45278/2020-CONDONATION OFDELAY IN FILING APPEAL and IA No.45285/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS and IA No.45281/2020-PERMISSION TO FILELENGTHY LIST OF DATES

ConnectedDiary No. 3484-2020XVII-A

M/S DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and IA No.34401/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGAPPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 3487-2020XVII-A

M/S DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENOIDAIA No.45336/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.45339/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS

ConnectedDiary No. 3492-2020XVII-A

M/S DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and IA No.31773/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGAPPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 3513-2020XVII-A

M/S. DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]IA No.34599/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

ConnectedDiary No. 3536-2020XVII-A

M/S DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and IA No.36769/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGAPPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 3544-2020XVII-A

M/S DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

IA No.34554/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGConnectedDiary No. 3545-2020XVII-A

M/S DHARMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

IA No.34991/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

Page 15: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedDiary No. 3547-2020XVII-A

M/S DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENOIDA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

IA No.34342/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.34346/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 2469/2020XVII-A

M/S. DHARAMPAL PREMCHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]IA No.45315/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.45317/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS

25 C.A. No.10180-10181/2010XII-A

RAMANAVARAPU SAMPATH KUMAR G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

VersusPIDIKITI VENKATARATNAM (D) BY LRS. DUA ASSOCIATES[CAVEAT], SATYA MITRA

26 C.A. No. 6515/2012IV

M/S. KARNAL MILK FOODS LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1], PAWANSHREEAGRAWAL[INT]

IA No.67821/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION ONLY IN C.A. NO. 6515 OF 2012I.A. No.145163/2019 APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CASEI.A.NO.146033/2019 APPLICATION FOR EARLY HEARING OF WITHDRAWAL OFINTERVENTION APPLICATION

ConnectedC.A. No. 6522/2012IV

M/S. BHARAT DAIRY UDYOG AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 110381/2020 FOR WITHDRAWAL OFCASE / APPLICATION ON IA 110384/2020

ConnectedC.A. No. 6520/2012IV

M/S. DAILY FOODS (INDIA) AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA ANIMALHUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6525/2012IV

M/S. KWALITY DAIRY INDIA LTD. ANDANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6530/2012IV

M/S.G.K.DAIRY AND MILK PRODUCTSPVT. LTD AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6523/2012IV

M/S STERLING AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD. M. P. DEVANATH, R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6524/2012IV

M/S MODERN DAIRIES LTD. AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], M. P.DEVANATH[P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6528/2012IV

M/S. SMRITI PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. ANDANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

Page 16: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No. 6527/2012IV

M/S HARYANA MILK FOODS LTD. ANDANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6518/2012IV

M/S GOLDMINE MILKFOOD .LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6519/2012IV

KMG MILK FOOD LTD R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11193/2014IV

M/S MEHSANA DISTRICT COOPERATIVEMILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED CHANDRA BHUSHAN PRASAD

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 2208/2020IV

HERITAGE FOODS LIMITED GUNTUR PRAMOD KUMAR

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.33597/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

27 C.A. No. 5593/2012III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.SECRETARY AND ORS. ANUVRAT SHARMA

Versus

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. RAVINDRA KUMAR, A. VENAYAGAM BALAN,[R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5594/2012III-A

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

ANUVRAT SHARMA, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],RAVINDRA KUMAR, [R-5]

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.267/2011 In C.A. No.5593/2012I-B

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

Versus

D.AGGARWAL . AND ORS.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 10262/2016XI

AJEET SINGH AND ORS AND ORS. SHANTANU SAGAR

VersusSTATE OF U.P ANUVRAT SHARMA

28 C.A. No. 8777/2012IX

MAHADEO BALIRAM NAWALKAR(DEAD)THROUGH LRS. NITIN BHARDWAJ[P-1]

Versus

AMBADAS AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

29 C.A. No. 7238/2011XIV-A

PRITHI SINGH AND ANR. EJAZ MAQBOOL[P-1]VersusSURINDER SINGH AND ORS. ASHWANI KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

30 C.A. No. 1392/2011XI-A

MADHAVAN (DEAD)THROUGH LRS. ANDANR. KIRAN BHARDWAJ[P-1]

VersusKANAKAVALLY JOGY SCARIA[R-1]I.A.NO. 2 : APPLICATION FOR VACATING STAY

31 C.A. No. 9485/2013XI-A

VELAYUDHAN NADAR NARAYAN NADAR SUMITA HAZARIKAVersus

Page 17: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5B.K.THANKAPPAN AND ORS. M. P. VINOD

32 C.A. No. 10215/2011IV-A

SHIVSHANKARA AND ANR. NARENDRA KUMAR[P-1]VersusH.P.VEDAVYASA CHAR RITESH KUMAR CHOWDHARY[R-1]

33 C.A. No. 6667/2013XII-A

PYLA DEMUDAMMA K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURIVersusCHEEPURUPALLI CHANDRAMMA ANDORS. AND ORS.

M. A. CHINNASAMY[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

IA No.89692/2017-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION and34 C.A. No. 886-887/2016

IV-ASHARANABASAPPA LAWYER S KNIT & CO[P-1]VersusNAGENDRA . AND ORS. M. A. KRISHNA MOORTHY[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22517/2011IV-A

NAGENDRA . AND ORS. M. A. KRISHNA MOORTHY[P-1], [P-2], [P-3],[P-4], [P-5]

VersusSHARANABASAPPA . AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO[R-1]

35 C.A. No. 4290/2017XVI

BHUPAL SINGH (D) THR. LRS . ANDORS. T. MAHIPAL

Versus

GANESH AHIR . AND ORS. MANU SHANKER MISHRA, KIRAN KUMARJAIPURIAR

IA No.62636/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.59809/2017-XTRA and IA No.62630/2017-DELETION THE NAME OF RESPONDENT NO, 25 andIA No.62635/2017-IA FOR DELETION THE NAME OF RESP. NO. 73 and IANo.64835/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.64840/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.69892/2017-DISCHARGE OF ADVOCATE ON RECORD and IA No.70060/2017-PERMISSION TOFILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.70062/2017-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. and IA No.78896/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS and IA No.78898/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

36 C.A. No.12048-12049/2018IV-A

SINGAMASETTY BHAGAVATH GUPTHAAND ANR. ANNAM D. N. RAO

VersusALLAM KARIBASAPPA(D) BY LRS./ALLAMDODDABASAPPA (D) BY LRS. AND ORS.

V. N. RAGHUPATHY, ABDUL AZEEMKALEBUDDE[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11]

ConnectedC.A. No.12050-12053/2018IV-A

ALLAM KARIBASAPPA(D) BY LRS. ANDORS. .ETC .ETC ABDUL AZEEM KALEBUDDE

VersusSINGAMASETTY VENKATARAMAIAH .AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE

37 Crl.A. No. 627/2012II-C

MUTHU AND ANR. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR, M. A. CHINNASAMYVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 803/2012II-C

RAMACHANDRAN AND ORS. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR[P-1], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5], T.HARISH KUMAR[P-2], SURESHAN P.[P-6]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

38 C.A. No.8220-8221/2012IX

MARMAGOA STEEL LTD. .AND ANR. UMESH KUMAR KHAITAN

VersusTHE STATE OF GOA AND ORS. AND ORS. A. SUBHASHINI

39 Crl.A. No. 818/2014II

NARAYAN DUTT JAIL PETITION[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND STATEOF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]

Page 18: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 540 C.A. No.

7825-7828/2013XII

V.N.A.S.CHANDRAN ZOHEB HOSSAIN[P-1][PR]

Versus

MRS. S. VENILLA AND ORS. AND ORS. ARAVINDH S.[R-1], R. AYYAM PERUMAL[R-2],[R-2], P. V. YOGESWARAN[R-3]

41 Crl.A. No. 1856/2012II-C

RAJRANI ARJUN GARG[P-1]VersusSTATE OF M.P. (NOW STATE OFCHHATISGARH) VMZ CHAMBERS[R-1][GR]

42 C.A. No. 2614/2012XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMAVersusTEXMACO LIMITED . AND ORS. KHAITAN & CO.

43 C.A. No. 928/2016IV-C

RAMKALI SONI AND ORS. MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ[P-1]VersusMUKTA SONI AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-1]

44 C.A. No. 2920/2014IV

SATYA PAL SHARMA AND ANR. ROHIT KUMAR SINGHVersusASHA VERMA (D) THR. LRS. PIYUSH SHARMA

45 C.A. No.3405-3407/2012III

COMMR.OF CUS.CEN.EXC.SER.TAXRAJKOT B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusNARSIBHAI KARAMSIBHAI . AND ORS. NIKHIL JAIN[R-1]

46 C.A. No. 6173/2012XII-A

M/S H.B.CARGO SERVICES P. VINAY KUMARVersusCOMMR.OF CUSTOMS ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

47 Crl.A. No. 794/2013II-B

BHAG SINGH J. P. DHANDA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

48 C.A. No.7791-7796/2013III

KALUBHAI KHATUBHAI AND ORS. PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

49 C.A. No. 7283/2012IV-A

M/S SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LTD. KUSH CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE . AND ANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No.5066-5073/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. SHREE RENUKA SUGAR LTD. ETC.ETC.

KUSH CHATURVEDIHARISH PANDEY[INT]

50 C.A. No. 4750/2013III-A

STATE OF U.P. AND ANR. SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusTEJPAL SINGH CHAUHAN (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[R-1]

51 C.A. No.13744-13747/2015IV-A

N.ARASAPPA (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], ANKOLEKARGURUDATTA[R-4]

SET DOWN THE MATTERS FOR FINAL DISPOSAL ON TUESDAY, THE 8.12.2020-R/P DT.13.10.2020

Page 19: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No.13749-13752/2015IV-A

HANUMAIAH (DEAD) (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], ANKOLEKARGURUDATTA[R-1]

FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESON IA 2762/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 2763/2019 FORAPPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 122708/2020 FOR CONDONATION OFDELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 122709/2020 FOR APPLICATIONFOR ABATEMENT ON IA 122710/2020

ConnectedC.A. No.13759-13762/2015IV-A

KEMPAIAH (D) TR.LRS. (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], ANKOLEKARGURUDATTA[R-1]

FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESON IA 2299/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 2300/2019

ConnectedC.A. No.13754-13757/2015IV-A

CHANDRA (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], ANKOLEKARGURUDATTA[R-2], [R-4]

FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA2420/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 2422/2019 FORCLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 139383/2019 FOR REVOCATION OF COURTORDER ON IA 24503/2020

ConnectedC.A. No. 13753/2015IV-A

N.DHANANJAYA AND ANR. ABDUL AZEEM KALEBUDDE[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], ANKOLEKARGURUDATTA[R-4]

FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESON IA 142109/2018 FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 138358/2019FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 177542/2019 FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. ON IA 177555/2019 FOR REVOCATION OF COURT ORDER ONIA 24509/2020

52 C.A. No. 8903/2012XIV-A

BISHAN DEVI (D) TR. LRS. MOHIT D. RAMVersusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ANDORS.

SAHARYA & CO.[CAVEAT], SUSHMA SURI,RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8904/2012XIV-A

M/S GUPTA MACHINE TOOLS LTD. MOHIT D. RAM

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SAHARYA & CO.[CAVEAT], SUSHMA SURI,RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

ConnectedC.A. No. 5538/2017XIV-A

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ASHWANI KUMAR

VersusHARSH GUPTA . AND ORS. MOHIT D. RAM, ATUL KUMAR

53 C.A. No. 9145/2012XIV-A

NARAYAN SINGH(D) THR LRS. BANKEY BIHARIVersusSH. BHULLE AMBAR QAMARUDDIN

ConnectedSLP(C) No.28238-28243/2012XIV

PREM PRAKASH(D) TR.LRS. PAREKH & CO.

Versus

SARLA SHARMA(D) TR.LRS. AND ORS. P. V. YOGESWARAN[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], AMIT ANAND TIWARI[R-7]

Page 20: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 554 Crl.A. No. 1594/2013

IIKALAWATI AND ANR. TULIKA PRAKASH[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. (NOW STATE OFUTTARAKHAND) KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1595/2013II

MANVENDRA SINGH TULIKA PRAKASH[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND FARRUKH RASHEED[R-1][GR]UID FOR [I A FOR BAIL] ON IA 58393/2017 FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATIONON IA 104936/2018

55 Crl.A. No. 762/2015II

IRFAN S. S. NEHRA[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1][GR]IA No.108849/2017 APPLICATION FOR BAIL IA No.108852/2017-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. IA No.18562/2015 APPLN. U/S 7A OF JUVENILE JUSTICE ACTETC. IA No.18563/2015 EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

56 Crl.A. No. 1348/2014II

NITYA NAND P. K. JAIN[P-1]Versus

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1]MANJU JETLEY[IMPL]

57 Crl.A. No. 257/2013II-A

FIROZ KHAN AKBARKHAN VIPIN KUMAR JAI[P-1][SCLSC], NIDHI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

58 C.A. No. 6859/2014IV-A

PARVATHI NAIRTHI (DEAD) AND ORS. BINA GUPTAVersusLAXMI NAIRTHY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.AND ORS. MADHUSMITA BORA[R-1.3], [R-1.2]

59 C.A. No. 3312/2015XII-A

GUNDLURI GOVINDA REDDY SESHATALPA SAI BANDARUVersusMALLU VENKATARAMANA REDDY ANDORS. Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO[CAVEAT]

60 Crl.A. No. 2206/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]VersusLAXMAN AND ORS.

61 C.A. No.14053-14054/2015XII

S. SHIVAKUMAR PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI

VersusS. VALLIKANNU @ VALLIAMMAL ANDORS S. MAHENDRAN

{Fixed Date by Court for 16-03-2021 }62 Crl.A. No. 549/2015

II-BRAJINDER SINGH @ RAVINDER SINGH VANITA MEHTA[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

63 Crl.A. No. 1320/2014II-A

KISHORE SHANKAR PATIL ADITYA SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR. SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

64 Crl.A. No. 1529/2014II-A

HARJITSINGH RAJ KAMAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1539/2014II-A

RAMAKANT RAMRAO DENGALE ANDANR. AMOL NIRMALKUMAR SURYAWANSHI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Page 21: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1530/2014II-A

TUKARAM V. K. SIDHARTHAN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1541-1544/2014II-A

RAJENDRA SHIVAJIRAO THORAT ANDANR. UDAY B. DUBE[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1531/2014II-A

ABA @ DNYANDEO TULIKA PRAKASH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1545-1547/2014II-A

ABDUL HAQ FAKIR MOHAMMADKURESHI SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1534/2014II-A

HARDIK SUDHA GUPTA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1533/2014II-A

BALKISAN SUDHA GUPTA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1532/2014II-A

RUCHIN SUDHA GUPTA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS ON IA 114874/2018

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1538/2014II-A

AJAY AMOL NIRMALKUMAR SURYAWANSHI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1535/2014II-A

VASANT ASTHA SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1536/2014II-A

RAGHUNATH RAMNATH ZOLEKAR KAILAS BAJIRAO AUTADE[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1540/2014II-A

AKASH SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1548/2014II-A

CHETAN RAJEEV SHARMA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.2161-2164/2014II-A

ASHOK ARVIND S. AVHAD[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

Page 22: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedCrl.A. No.705-706/2015II-A

VILAS SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

65 C.A. No.5667-5668/2014IV-A

M LAKSHMANA RAO AND ORS. SHAILESH MADIYAL

VersusS NARAYANA RAO AND ORS. ABDUL AZEEM KALEBUDDE

66 C.A. No. 455/2015III-A

JAI PRAKASH GAUR K. S. RANAVersusBUDHA DEVI AND ORS. RABIN MAJUMDER, JAYANT KUMAR MEHTA

67 Crl.A. No. 386/2015II

UMED SINGH . AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN SANDEEP KUMAR JHA[R-1]

68 C.A. No. 35/2019XIV-A

HAROLI BLOCK INDUSTRIESASSOCIATION DHEERAJ NAIR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], MANSOORALI[R-4], ANIL KATIYAR[R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 36-38/2019XIV-A

HIMACHAL PRADESH VYAPAR MANDAL SIDDHARTH SINGLA[P-1], SANTOSHKRISHNAN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], ABHAYKUMAR[R-3], ANIL KATIYAR[R-6], MANSOORALI[R-9], [R-10]

ConnectedC.A. No. 39/2019XIV-A

SANYUKT VYAPAR MANDAL RAJAN NARAIN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], ANILKATIYAR[R-4], MANSOOR ALI[R-5]KUNDAN KUMAR MISHRA[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 40/2019XIV-A

RETAILERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA NIHARIKA AHLUWALIA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], MANSOORALI[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 43/2019XIV-A

NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATIONOF INDIA KUNAL VERMA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], MANSOORALI[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 44-46/2019XIV-A

INDIAN CONFECTIONERYMANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION DUA ASSOCIATES[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS. VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 41-42/2019XIV-A

BRANDED EDIBLE OIL MANUFACTURESASSOCIATION AND ANR. DHEERAJ NAIR[P-1]

Versus

SANJEEV KUMAR AND ORS. VINOD SHARMA[R-2], [R-3], [R-9], [R-10], ANILKATIYAR[R-7], [R-11]

69 C.A. No. 15098/2017XIV-A

M/S AGRICULTURE PRODUCE MARKETCOMMITTEE AND ANR. ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1]

VersusMAHESH UDYOG MANAGED BY M/SSHANKAR TRADING CO. LTD AND ANR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-1], [R-2]

Page 23: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 570 C.A. No.

6325-6326/2015XII-A

AKELLA LALITHA SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA

VersusKONDA HANUMANTHA RAO AND ANR.

71 Crl.A. No. 531/2017II-A

SAMABAI BHANUDAS KSHRISAGAR DR.RAJEEV SHARMA[P-1]VersusTUKARAM GANGARAM KSHIRSAGARAND ANR. GEETHA KOVILAN[R-1], SACHIN PATIL[R-3]

72 Crl.A. No. 521/2015II-A

SURESH DNYANDEO KATE ATUL BABASAHEB DAKHVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

73 C.A. No. 9253/2017III

MAHARASHTRA DISTILLERIES LTD(NOW KNOWN AS UNITED SPIRITSLIMITED)

KHAITAN & CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRATHROUGH ITS SECRETARY SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

74 C.A. No. 9725/2014IV-A

M/S. MARUTI ISPAT AND ENERGY PVTLTD. RANJAN KUMAR[P-1], [INT]

Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]ROHIT K. SINGH[INT], HITENDRA NATHRATH[INT], E. C. AGRAWALA[INT]

IA No.140166/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION and IA No.21230/2018-INTERVENTION APPLICATION

ConnectedC.A. No.10355-10357/2014IV-A

M/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT LTD R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXGUNTUR AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]RAJEEV SINGH[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10497/2014IV-A

DAVANGERE SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED MEERA MATHUR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 523/2015IV-A

HIRANYAKESHI SAHAKARI SAKKAREKARKHANE NIYAMIT M. P. DEVANATH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,MANGLORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 9271/2014IV-A

M/S ZUARI CEMENT LIMITED MEERA MATHUR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXGUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 10299/2014IV-A

DECCAN CEMENTS LTD. RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMIISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXGUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 429/2015IV-A

M/S AGARWAL COAL CORPORATION PVTLTD. PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSAND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Page 24: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No. 7/2015IV-A

TOPWORTH STEEL AND POWERPVT.LTD PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISIONER OF CUSTOMS,VISHAKAPATNAM AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 430-432/2015IV-A

M/S SWASTIK COAL CORP. PVT LTD PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 11920/2014IV-A

M/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT LTD R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3131/2015IV-A

M/S. KESORAM INDUSTRIES LTD. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX,GUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3769/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S DEVANGERE SUGAR COMPANYLTD. MEERA MATHUR

ConnectedC.A. No.5999-6000/2015III

M/S. WEST COAST PAPER MILLS LTD. GAUTAM NARAYAN

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.5722-5723/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,MANGALORE CUSETC. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSWASTIK COAL CORPORATION PVT.LTD. ETC. PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 2638/2016IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT. LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5877/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,MANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT. LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No.8916-8917/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

ZUARI CEMENT LTD AND ANR. MEERA MATHUR[R-1], CHARANYALAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3118/2016IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSVIJAYAWADA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusSHREE JAYAJOTHI CEMENTS LTD RAJESH KUMAR-I[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4976/2016IV-A

ADANI ENTERPRISES LTD. HARISH PANDEY

Versus

Page 25: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDSERVICE TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedDiary No. 12289-2019XVII-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSJAMNAGAR (PREV) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S AQUAGEL CHEMICALS PVT. LTD.IA No.73729/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTand IA No.73728/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.73727/2019-CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 9241-2019XVII-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSKANDLA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S ORIENT ABRASIVES LTD. ANEESH MITTAL[R-1]IA No.78833/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.78836/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.78835/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.78834/2019-CONDONATION OFDELAY IN REFILING

75 C.A. No. 10292/2014IV-A

VIBGYOR SCHOOL, N S PALYA AND ORS. M. RAMBABU AND CO.VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. VIPIN KUMAR JAI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 10293/2014IV-A

CHRIST SCHOOL (ICSE) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. VIPIN KUMAR JAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 10294/2014IV-A

ST. MIRAS SCHOOL PRABHA SWAMI

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. VIPIN KUMAR JAI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedSLP(C) No.21715-21717/2018III

RAJKOT KELAVANI SAMAJ (ST. MARYENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL MORBI )THROUGH PRINCIPAL DAVIS MANJALY

GAUTAM TALUKDAR

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22396/2018III

AYYAPPA EDUCATION CENTRE(SABARIVIDYALAYA) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA116654/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155917/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No.23243-23244/2018III

JAMNAGAR EDUCATIONAL ANDCHARITABLE TRUST JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA120296/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155937/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23035/2018III

STELLA MARIS TRUST JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESON IA 156008/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No.22368-22370/2018III

MAR GREGORIOS ORTHODOX SYRIANCHURCH BARODA JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]

Page 26: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA116486/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155959/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23227/2018III

GUJARAT EDUCATION BOARD OFCATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESON IA 155870/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23037/2018III

BASIL TRUST BARODA JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118805/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155895/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No.23173-23174/2018III

SACHIDANANAD VIDYALAYA TRUST JOSE ABRAHAM

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT], [R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA119734/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155908/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30083-2018III

ASHADHAMSEVA MANDAL VAPI (ST.XAVIERS SCHOOL KHILODA) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 118455/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 118459/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30108-2018III

MATRU JYOTHI EDUCATIONALTRUST(SCHOOL JAM KAMABALIYA) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 118749/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 118750/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30117-2018III

ST. ANNES HIGH SCHOOL TRUST (STANNES SCHOOL NADIAD) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 116907/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA116908/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30122-2018III

THE PROVINCIAL SOCIETY OF THECONGREGATION OF JESUS AND MARY(CONVENT OF JESUS AND MARY GIRLSSCHOOL

JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 118759/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118760/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30160-2018III

AUXILIUM SOCIETY (AUXILIUMCONVENT SCHOOL) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 118761/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118762/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155970/2018

Page 27: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedDiary No. 30164-2018III

DAKOR SALESIAN SOCIETY (DONBOSCO ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 118499/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 118500/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22983/2018III

GUJARAT EDUCATION BOARD OFCATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS AND ANR. JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118414/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30413-2018III

DIVINE CHILD SEVA KENDRA AND ORS. JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 119622/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA119627/2018

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 581/2019X

GUJARAT EDUCATION BOARD OFCATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION

76 Crl.A. No. 2555/2014II-C

ATMARAM NITIN BHARDWAJ[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]

77 C.A. No. 6282/2015XII

THE STATE INDUSTRIES PROMOTIONCORP. OF TAMIL NADU LTD SUDARSH MENON

VersusT. H. INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ANDANR. P. S. SUDHEER, GARIMA PRASHAD

78 Crl.A. No. 1265/2015II

RAM BETI C. K. RAI[P-1]VersusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH GARVESH KABRA[R-1]

79 Crl.A. No. 1962/2017II-A

M/S. KITPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED RABIN MAJUMDER[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

SACHIN PATIL[R-1], AMIT K. NAIN[R-2],ASHISH RANA[R-3]

80 C.A. No. 372/2018IV

M/S. ALPHA G. CORP. DEVELOPMENTPVT. LTD. SUPRIYA JUNEJA[P-1]

VersusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION AMRITSARAND ORS.

P. N. PURI[R-1], UTTARA BABBAR[R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

81 C.A. No.5094-5098/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, DAMAN B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. WELLKNOWN SYNTHETICS PVT.LTD. THROUGH ITS GENERALMANAGER

RAHUL GUPTA[R-2], [R-3], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 820-823/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, VAPI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S BHILOSA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. .AND ORS. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]

FOR FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 9/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 88605/2018

Page 28: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No.1111-1117/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S. BEEKALYON SYNTHERICS PVT.LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR

RAHUL GUPTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 15/2016ConnectedC.A. No.9214-9235/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,SURAT - I, (GUJRAT) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. GARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. ANDORS. PAREKH & CO.

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 45/2015

ConnectedC.A. No. 7240/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISECUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusGARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. THROUGHITS CHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR PAREKH & CO.

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2015ConnectedC.A. No.1988-1991/2020XVII-A

M/S CENTURY ENKA LTD. O. P. GAGGAR

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISERAIGAD B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and IA No.41181/2020-EX-PARTE STAY82 Crl.A. No. 1418/2015

II-ATALASHO DEVI @ TARAWATI DEVI SUBHRO SANYALVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI

83 C.A. No. 14622/2015XVI

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]VersusRAM GOPAL AGARWALA . AND ORS. DHEERAJ NAIR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 14623/2015XVI

THE STATE OF BENGAL AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]

VersusBRC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PVT.LTD. . AND ANR. APARNA SINHA[R-1]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 39165/201984 Crl.A. No. 1067/2017

IIHANSRAJ LAXMIDAS MERCHANT P. V. DINESH[P-1]VersusRAJESH RATHI AND ORS. PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-2]

85 C.A. No. 720-722/2019XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. IRSHAD AHMADVersusJ.K. TYRE AND INDUSTRIES LIMITEDFORMERLY KNOWN AS J.K. INDUSTRIESLIMITED

G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

86 C.A. No.23986-23987/2017IV

SUSHIL KUMAR AJAY KUMAR SINGH

VersusTAPTESH KAUR @ TAAPTESH KAURAND ANR. SHIV SAGAR TIWARI

87 C.A. No. 10020/2017IV

SEEMA DAHIYA AND ANR. GAUR & NEHRA LAW FIRM[P-1]Versus

COL. DHARAMPAL (RETD.) AND ANR. MUKUL KUMAR[R-1][PR], HARSH V.SURANA[R-2][PR]

Page 29: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5and IA No.128745/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.128746/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.129743/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR ON IA 1/2016 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 2/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T. ON IA 3/2017

88 Crl.A. No. 901/2016II-B

MAINUDDIN GAZI SHEKHAR KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

89 C.A. No. 8202/2016XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHENNAI IV B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSANTEL COMMUNICATION PVT LTDTHR. FINANCIAL ADVISOR

ConnectedDiary No. 9270-2017XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHENNAI-IV B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSANTEL INDUSTRIESIA No.42446/2017-STAY APPLICATION

90 C.A. No. 20903/2017XIV-A

MANOJ CHATURVEDIVersusSANGEETA CHATURVEDI SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

91 C.A. No.10624-10625/2017IV-A

SRINIVASAIAH, (D) BY LRS AND ORS. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusA C PUTTASWAMY (DEAD) BY LRS ANDORS. VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH

92 Crl.A. No. 60-63/2017II-A

HIRA MANDAL ANIL K. CHOPRA[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1], AJAY KUMARTALESARA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

93 C.A. No. 3358/2020III

SANDOZ PRIVATE LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[P-1]VersusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3360/2020XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHINDUSTAN TIN WORKS LIMITED RUPESH KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3359/2020III

LUPIN LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3705/2020IV-A

DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL OFFOREIGN TRADE AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ACER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ANDORS.

T. SUNDAR RAMANATHAN[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-4]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.103299/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.103300/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT

94 Crl.A. No. 281/2017II

KAILASH CHANDRA M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR]

95 C.A. No. 1344/2017XVI

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. NIRANJANA SINGH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusINSTAKART SERVICES PRIVATELIMITED RONY OOMMEN JOHN[R-1]

Page 30: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No. 1346/2017XVI

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. NIRANJANA SINGH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusWS RETAIL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5379/2017III

M/S AMAZON SELLER SERVICES PVT.LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 15149/2017IV-C

M/S. INSTAKART SERVICES PVT. LTD. RONY OOMMEN JOHN[P-1], [P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDANR. SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-1][GR], [R-2][GR]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

96 C.A. No. 6077/2018XIV-A

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPALCORPORATION THROUGH ITSCOMMISSIONER

VANDANA SEHGAL

VersusBHARAT BHUSHAN JAIN ADVOCATE ABHAY KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6078/2018XIV-A

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPALCORPORATION VANDANA SEHGAL

VersusBHARAT BHUSHAN JAIN ABHAY KUMAR

97 C.A. No. 3918/2017IV

ATMA RAM (DECEASED) THR LEGALREP. DHARMPAL GOYAL ASHOK PANIGRAHI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1][GR], BIRENDRAKUMAR MISHRA[R-2][GR], RAM NARESHYADAV[R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8]

98 C.A. No. 19652/2017XIV-A

PIONEER OVERSEAS CORPORATION ADITYA VERMAVersusKAVERI SEED COMPANY LIMITED ANDOTHERS RANJAN KUMAR PANDEY[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No.19653-19654/2017XIV-A

REGISTRAR OF PLANT VARIETIES ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1], [P-2]

VersusPRABHAT AGRI BIOTECH LIMITED ANDORS.

RANJAN KUMAR PANDEY[CAVEAT], ABHAYKUMAR[R-3]

IA No.53223/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.53227/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

99 C.A. No. 7269/2018XVI-A

THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR SATISH PANDEY[P-1]VersusTHE JAMMU AND KASHMIR STATEACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSION ANDORS.

SATYA MITRA[R-1], [R-2]

100 C.A. No. 3021/2019XV

BRIJ BIHARI AGARWAL (BHAGAT) ANDANR. SHOBHA GUPTA

VersusSUNIL CHAND KOTHARI B. S. BANTHIA[R-1]

101 C.A. No. 1271/2018III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX MUMBAI B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusMAN INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

Page 31: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5

ConnectedC.A. No.1259-1270/2018III

COMMISIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEMUMBAI -I [NOW PRESENTLYCOMMISSIONER OF GOODS ANDSERVICE TAX, MUMBAI

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. WELSPUN CORPORATION LTD.(PLATE AND COIL MILLS DIVISION) E. C. AGRAWALA[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10604/2018XVII-A

CGST C.C AND C.E JABALPUR B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusMAIHAR CEMENT K. V. MOHAN[R-1]IA No.139682/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.139685/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.139683/2018-EX-PARTE STAY

ConnectedC.A. No. 10749/2018XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND ST JAIPUR 1 B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10751/2018XVII-A

CCE AND S.T. JAIPUR 1 B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITEDKOTPUTLI CEMENT WORKS THROUGHDIRECTOR

PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and IA No.139135/2018-STAY APPLICATION and IANo.139134/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 10990/2018XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODSAND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSHREE JAIPUR CEMENT LIMITEDIA No.153284/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.153286/2018-STAY APPLICATION

ConnectedC.A. No. 108/2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODSAND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSHREE CEMENT LIMITED M. P. DEVANATH[R-1]IA No.182140/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.182141/2018-STAY APPLICATION

ConnectedC.A. No. 1271/2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS ANDSERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD. PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[CAVEAT]IA No.165662/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.165665/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.165664/2018-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.165663/2018-CONDONATION OFDELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 1628/2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODSAND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusTS TECH SUN RAJASTHAN PVT. TLD. KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]IA No.20260/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTand IA No.20258/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.20256/2019-CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 1780/2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODSAND SERVICE TAX,CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSHREE CEMENT LIMITED THROUGHDIRECTOR M. P. DEVANATH[R-1]

Page 32: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No. 4636/2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S RAS NEW CEMENT UNITFOR ADMISSION and IA No.67901/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IANo.67902/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.67899/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL and IA No.67900/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 28332-2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODSAND SERVICES TAX, CUSTOMS ANDEXCISE, JABALPUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]IA No.134268/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.134271/2019-STAY APPLICATION

ConnectedDiary No. 30913-2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODSAND SERVICE TAX AND CENTRALEXCISE JABALPUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S JAYPEE BELA PLANT CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and IA No.145421/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IANo.145420/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 7862/2019XVII-A

CGST C. C. AND C. E. JABALPUR B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusQUALITY WOVEN SACKS PVT. LTD. K. V. MOHAN[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and IA No.147535/2019-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.147534/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 8621/2019XVII-A

C.G.S.T.C. AND C.E. ALWAR B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusHONDA MOTORCYCLE AND SCOOTERSINDIA PVT. LTD. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]

IA No.166301/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.166305/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.166303/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS

ConnectedC.A. No.8615-8617/2019XVII-A

C.G.ST C AND C.E. ALWAR B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

HONDA MOTORCYCLE AND SCOOTERSINDIA PVT. LTD. PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.52247/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.52248/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.52249/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 2840/2020XVII-A

M/S HALDIA PETROCHEMICALSLIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX HALDIAFOR ADMISSION and IA No.71124/2020-EX-PARTE STAY

102 Crl.A. No. 859/2018II-B

KISHAN KHUBCHAND KORANI ANDANR. NIKHIL GOEL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.975-976/2018II-B

UMESHBHAI SURABHAI BHARWAD NIKHIL GOEL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-1], [R-2]

Page 33: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5FOR [APPLN. FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING THE PLAIN COPY OF I/JUDGMENTAND TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT] ON IA 102875/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 104564/2018 FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. ON IA 104565/2018

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 999/2019II-B

MORLI NARANBHAI SINDHI @ MURLI BHARTI TYAGI

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. DEEPANWITA PRIYANKAPRAYER FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES ON IA 91118/2019FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA91121/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING TRIAL COURT ORDER ON IA91123/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 91124/2019 FORAPPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 96503/2020

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 582/2019II-B

PREMCHAND @ TIWARI CONDUCTORAND ANR. GOPAL JHA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-1]PRAYER FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ONIA 47773/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 47774/2019 FORPERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA154927/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 154928/2019

ConnectedDiary No. 46572-2018II-B

NARESH @ NARIYO ANISH KUMAR GUPTA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-1]FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 42331/2019 FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS ON IA42332/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTON IA 42334/2019 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES ON IA42336/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTON IA 42339/2019 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 143361/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. ON IA 143365/2019

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1573/2018II-B

PRAKASH SURESHBHAI RATHOD(CHHARA) BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-1]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 7680/2019 FOR PERMISSION TOFILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 31170/2019 FORPERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA97989/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 97990/2019 FORPERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA136612/2019 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 156453/2019

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 131/2019II-B

BABUBHAI @ BABU BAJRANGI ARCHANA PATHAK DAVE[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-1], [R-2]APARNA BHAT[INT]

FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 133429/2018 FOR PERMISSIONTO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 133434/2018 FORPERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA178675/2018 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 17785/2019 FORPERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA25980/2019

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 130/2019II-B

HARSHAD @ MUNGDA JILA GOVINDCHHARA PARMAR NACHIKETA JOSHI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-1]FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA138328/2018

Page 34: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedCrl.A. No.1275-1276/2018II-B

PADMENDRASINH JASWANTSINHRAJPUT RASHMI SINGHANIA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-1], APARNABHAT[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

IA No.142442/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.142443/2018-GRANT OF BAIL and IA No.142446/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.142444/2018-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1214-1215/2018II-B

RAJKUMAR@RAJU SHARMILA UPADHYAY[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-1], [R-2], APARNABHAT[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8]

FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA101173/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 101174/2018

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1289/2019II-B

HARESH@ HARIYO ANISH KUMAR GUPTA

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT DEEPANWITA PRIYANKAPRAYER FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ONIA 124133/2019 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES ON IA124134/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING TRIAL COURT ORDER ON IA124136/2019 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 143302/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. ON IA 143308/2019

103 Crl.A. No. 878/2019II-A

AJAY KUMAR GUPTA VIVEK SINGHVersusUNION OF INDIA B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 1573/2019II-A

JASVINDER SINGH @KOOKI DHANANJAY GARG

VersusUNION OF INDIA B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA96734/2020

104 Crl.A. No. 660/2019II-A

ARUN KUMAR VERMA AND ANR. SAMEER SHRIVASTAVA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR. SACHIN PATIL[R-1], LIZ MATHEW[R-2]

105 C.A. No. 10329/2018III

INDUS TOWER LTD. NEERAJ SHEKHAR[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-1][GR], [R-3][GR],[R-4][GR], B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2][GR],[R-5][GR]

106 C.A. No. 2374/2019III

M/S FEDERAL BANK PALLAVI PRATAPVersus

JYOTI H. MEHTA AND ORS.S. R. SETIA[CAVEAT], ANURADHAMUTATKAR[R-4], ARVIND KUMARTEWARI[R-6], K J JOHN AND CO[R-7]

[ RELEASED FROM PART- HEARD ] [ TO RETAIN ITS POSITION ]ConnectedC.A. No. 3291/2019III

KISHORE J JANANI ANURADHA MUTATKAR[P-1]

VersusJYOTI H. MEHTA AND ORS. S. R. SETIA[R-1], ARVIND KUMAR TEWARI[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6078/2019III

JYOTI H MEHTA AND ORS. S. R. SETIA[P-1]

Versus

Page 35: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE … · 2021. 3. 12. · m/s steel authority of india through its sr. manager sh. b.n. agrawal m. p. devanath versus commissioner

COURT NO. : 5

KISHORE J. JANANI AND ORS.ANURADHA MUTATKAR[R-1], PALLAVIPRATAP[R-2], ARVIND KUMAR TEWARI[R-4], KJ JOHN AND CO[R-5]

107 C.A. No. 9643/2013XII

B. RAJAM AMMAL (D) BY LRS. K. K. MANI[P-1]VersusLAND COMMISSIONER, CHEPAUK ANDORS. AND ORS. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR[R-2][GR]

NEW DELHI12-03-2021 14:01:06

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR