Supporting Information for Walsh, Sachdeva & Silverman, J. Am ...
Transcript of Supporting Information for Walsh, Sachdeva & Silverman, J. Am ...
Supporting Information for Walsh, Sachdeva & Silverman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. page S1
DNA Catalysts with Tyrosine Kinase Activity
Shannon M. Walsh, Amit Sachdeva, and Scott K. Silverman*
Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 600 South Mathews Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
Table of Contents
Oligonucleotides, peptides, and DNA-anchored peptide conjugates ............................................. page S2 In vitro selection procedure ............................................................................................................ page S3 Selection progressions .................................................................................................................... page S6 Mass spectrometry and 8VP1 reactivity to establish phosphorylation product identities .............. page S7 Sequences of individual deoxyribozymes ...................................................................................... page S8 Single-turnover deoxyribozyme assay procedure .......................................................................... page S8 Additional data for deoxyribozyme kinetics and metal dependence .............................................. page S9 Dependence of deoxyribozyme activities on peptide and tether .................................................... page S13 Apparent Km(GTP) of 8EA101 and 16EC103 deoxyribozymes .................................................... page S15 References for Supporting Information .......................................................................................... page S16
OligonuclDNA
by solid-pylated RNtemplates with runnpreviouslyconjugatesterminal cas adapted
Figure S1.hexa(ethyle
Proce
5′-GGATAAdisulfide lDTT treatpH 7.5, anexcess DTproduct (Dacetate, pHdisulfide iby additioConjugatiand 5 µL the DNA-
Support
leotides, peptioligonucleoti
phase synthesNA (pppRNA
and T7 RNAning buffer 1×y.2 Peptides s were synth
cysteine side d from our rec
Synthesis andene glycol), or
edure for syntATACGACTCAlinker was intment. A 50 µnd 50 mM DTTT by additioDNA-HEG-p-H 7.0. Activain DMF and
on of 50 µL ofon to the pepof 20 mM peanchored pep
ting Informati
ides, and DNAides were obtsis on an ABIA) oligonucleA polymerase× TBE (89 m
were synthehesized by dischain of the pcent report.3
d structure of thHEG, tether c
thesis of DNAACTAT-HEG-pntroduced viaµL sample coTT was incubon of 50 µL o-C3-SH) was
ation as the pyincubating atf water, 10 µL
ptide was perfeptide (100 nmptide was puri
ion for Walsh
A-anchored ptained from InI 394 instrumotides were pe.1 All oligon
mM each Trisesized on thsulfide formapeptide, follo
he DNA-anchoonnecting the D
A-anchored pp-C3-SS-C3-Oa standard solontaining 5 nmbated at 37 °Cof water, 10 µdissolved in
yridyl disulfidt 37 °C for 2 L of 3 M NaCformed by admol, 20 equivified by 20%
h, Sachdeva &
peptide conjugntegrated DN
ment using reaprepared by
nucleotides w and boric ac
he solid phaation betweenowing the pro
ored CAAYAADNA oligonuc
peptide conjuOH-3′ (see filid-phase DNmol of DNA
C for 2 h. TheµL of 3 M Na35 µL of wat
de was achievh. The produ
Cl and 300 µLding 20 µL o
valents). The PAGE. A typ
Silverman, J.
gates NA Technologagents from Gin vitro tran
were purified bcid and 2 mMase as descrn a DNA HE
ocedure shown
A hexapeptide pcleotide anchor
ugate. The DNirst structure
NA synthesis anchor oligo
e reduced prodaCl, and 300 ter and 10 µL
ved by addinguct (DNA-HEL of ethanol aof 50 mM triesample was i
pical yield wa
J. Am. Chem. S
gies (CoralvilGlen Researc
nscription usiby 7 M urea
M EDTA, pHribed.3 DNAEG-tethered 3n in Figure S
phosphorylatior to the peptide
NA anchor oin Figure Sand unmask
onucleotide induct was precµL of ethano
L of 100 mM g 5 µL of 100 EG-p-C3-SSPyand dissolvedethylammoniuincubated at 3as 3.5–4.5 nm
Soc. p
lle, IA) or prech. 5′-Triphosng synthetic
a denaturing PH 8.3) as desc
A-anchored p3′-thiol and tS1 and given
on substrate. Ne.
ligonucleotidS1), where thked to a 3′-thn 100 mM HEcipitated to reol. The preciptriethylammomM 2,2′-dip
y) was precipd in 25 µL of wum acetate, pH37 °C for 12 h
mol.
age S2
epared sphor-DNA
PAGE cribed eptide the N-below
ote the
de was he 3′-
hiol by EPES, emove pitated onium
pyridyl pitated water. H 7.0, h, and
In vitro seThe se
as describ8VP1 deoFigure 2, a
Figure S2.of the 5′-trunwanted dat the α-phselections entirely; thnot base-paby Taq polprevious runphosphoGAATGAGGPAGE posversion (17rounds inclthe 5′-phosreaction paattachmentsequence tcapture olisuppressed
Support
election proceelection proc
bed previouslyoxyribozyme.and a depictio
. Nucleotide deriphosphorylatdeoxyribozymehosphorus atomfor which free
herefore, the leaired to anythilymerase and lreport for valiorylated Tyr (TGAAAGCACGAition, the lengt7 nt pppRNA, luding round 1sphorylated DNartners had dift of TyrOH to Rhat allows subigo, the 8VP1
d nonspecific cl
ting Informati
edure edure, cloniny,2a,4 but with5 An overvieon with nucle
etails of the seted RNA oligoes that catalyzem migrate diffe GTP replaceeft-hand DNA ing. In the reveleads to a size idation that 8yrOH).5 The seqAG-3′. To avoidth of the captueven-numbere). The pppRNA
NA componentfferent sequencRNA during thbstantial Watso1 binding armleavage (transe
ion for Walsh
ng, and initialh a different lew of the keyeotide details i
election and caonucleotide (3e covalent attacferently on PAd pppRNA as binding arm (ierse PCR primdifference bet
VP1 is highlyquence of the 8d emergence ofure oligo reactied rounds) andA-DNA chimet using a compces to avoid emhe capture stepon-Crick base
m was extendeesterification) o
h, Sachdeva &
analysis of iligation step3
y selection anis shown in F
apture steps of 6 nt pppRNAchment of the
AGE than doesthe phosphory
i.e., the pool smer, X is the H
tween the two y selective fo8VP1 catalyticf noncatalytic Don partner was
d a long versiora was prepare
plementary DNmergence of dp (this would pairing to the
ed several nuof the RNA nu
Silverman, J.
individual clo,5 and with a nd capture st
Figure S2.
in vitro selectA; phosphoryl
Tyr hydroxyl gs the desired cryl donor, the segment to the
HEG spacer (Gl PCR product
or reaction ofc region was 5′DNA sequences alternated in
on (54 nt pppRed by splint ligNA splint and Tdeoxyribozyme
be facilitated e constant captucleotides pastucleotides near
J. Am. Chem. S
ones were pernew capture
teps of each
tion. (A) Selecdonor) was chgroup to the RNcapture producRNA oligonuc5′-side of the
len Spacer 18)strands. (B) C
f phosphorylat-GGACACGATes that migratesuccessive rou
RNA-DNA chiation of the ppT4 DNA ligasees that catalyze
if the DNA rture oligo sequt the RNA-DNthe junction.
Soc. p
rformed essene step based oround is sho
tion step. The hosen such th
RNA via attackct of panel B. cleotide was orandom region
) that stops extCapture step. Sted Tyr (TyrP
GAGTGACTAAe aberrantly at aunds between amera, odd-num
ppRNA compone. The short ane unwanted corandom regionuence). For thNA junction,
age S3
ntially on the
own in
length
hat any of Tyr In the
omitted n) was tension See our P) over AGTG-a fixed a short
mbered nent to
nd long ovalent n had a he long
which
Supporting Information for Walsh, Sachdeva & Silverman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. page S4
Procedure for ligation step in round 1. The splint sequence was 5′-ATAGTGAGTCGTATTATCCTCCATC-AGGATCAGCTTAATACGACTCACTAT-3′, where the underlined T is included to account for the untemplated A nucleotide that is added at the 3′-end of each PCR product by Taq polymerase. This T nucleotide was omitted from the splint used for ligation of the initially random N40 pool, which was prepared by solid-phase synthesis without the untemplated A. A 35 µL sample containing 1 nmol of DNA pool, 800 pmol of DNA splint, and 500 pmol of 5′-phosphorylated DNA-anchored hexapeptide substrate was annealed in 5 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 15 mM NaCl, and 0.1 mM EDTA by heating at 95 °C for 3 min and cooling on ice for 5 min. To this solution was added 4 µL of 10× T4 DNA ligase buffer (400 mM Tris, pH 7.8, 100 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM ATP) and 1 µL of 5 U/µL T4 DNA ligase (Fermentas). The sample was incubated at 37 °C for 12 h and separated by 8% PAGE.
Procedure for ligation step in subsequent rounds. The same splint was used as in the round 1 ligation
procedure. A 17 µL sample containing the PCR-amplified DNA pool (~5–10 pmol), 25 pmol of DNA splint, and 50 pmol of 5′-phosphorylated DNA-anchored hexapeptide substrate was annealed in 5 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 15 mM NaCl, and 0.1 mM EDTA by heating at 95 °C for 3 min and cooling on ice for 5 min. To this solution was added 2 µL of 10× T4 DNA ligase buffer and 1 µL of 1 U/µL T4 DNA ligase (Fermentas). The sample was incubated at 37 °C for 12 h and separated by 8% PAGE.
Procedure for selection step in round 1. Each selection experiment was initiated with 200 pmol of the
ligated pool. A 20 µL sample containing 200 pmol of ligated pool and 300 pmol of 36 nt pppRNA phosphoryl donor was annealed in 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 15 mM NaCl, and 0.1 mM EDTA by heating at 95 °C for 3 min and cooling on ice for 5 min. The selection reaction was initiated by bringing the sample to 40 µL total volume containing 70 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 1 mM ZnCl2, 20 mM MnCl2, 40 mM MgCl2, and 150 mM NaCl. The Mn2+ was added from a 10× stock solution containing 200 mM MnCl2. The Zn2+ was added from a 10× stock solution containing 10 mM ZnCl2, 20 mM HNO3, and 200 mM HEPES at pH 7.5; this stock solution was freshly prepared from a 100× stock of 100 mM ZnCl2 in 200 mM HNO3. The metal ion stocks were added last to the final sample. For selections with GTP as the phosphoryl donor, the pppRNA was omitted and 1 mM GTP was added from a 10 mM stock solution after annealing. The sample was incubated at 37 °C for 14 h and separated by 8% PAGE.
Procedure for selection step in subsequent rounds. A 10 µL sample containing the ligated pool and 50
pmol of 36 nt pppRNA phosphoryl donor was annealed in 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 15 mM NaCl, and 0.1 mM EDTA by heating at 95 °C for 3 min and cooling on ice for 5 min. The selection reaction was initiated by bringing the sample to 20 µL total volume containing 70 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 1 mM ZnCl2, 20 mM MnCl2, 40 mM MgCl2, and 150 mM NaCl. For selections with GTP as the phosphoryl donor, the pppRNA was omitted and 1 mM GTP was added from a 10 mM stock solution after annealing. The sample was incubated at 37 °C for 14 h and separated by 8% PAGE.
Procedure for capture step in round 1. A 28 µL sample containing ligated pool, 500 pmol of 54 nt 5′-
triphosphorylated RNA-DNA chimera substrate, and 300 pmol of 8VP1 capture deoxyribozyme was annealed in 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 15 mM NaCl, and 0.1 mM EDTA by heating at 95 °C for 3 min and cooling on ice for 5 min. The capture reaction was initiated by bringing the sample to 40 µL total volume containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 20 mM MnCl2, and 150 mM NaCl. The sample was incubated at 37 °C for 14 h. Before PAGE, to the sample was added 500 pmol of a 60 nt decoy oligonucleotide complementary to the 40 nt 8VP1 catalytic region and 10 nt of binding arm on each side, to ensure complete removal of the capture deoxyribozyme from the pool. The sample was separated by 8% PAGE.
Procedure for capture step in subsequent rounds. A 14 µL sample containing ligated pool, 50 pmol of
17 nt pppRNA substrate (in even rounds) or 54 nt 5′-triphosphorylated RNA-DNA chimera substrate (in odd rounds), and 25 pmol of 8VP1 capture deoxyribozyme was annealed in 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 15 mM NaCl, and 0.1 mM EDTA by heating at 95 °C for 3 min and cooling on ice for 5 min. The capture
Supporting Information for Walsh, Sachdeva & Silverman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. page S5
reaction was initiated by bringing the sample to 20 µL total volume containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 20 mM MnCl2, and 150 mM NaCl. The sample was incubated at 37 °C for 14 h. To the sample was added 100 pmol of a 60 nt decoy oligonucleotide complementary to the 40 nt 8VP1 catalytic region and 10 nt of binding arm on each side (note that the decoy sequence is different in even-numbered and odd-numbered rounds). The product was separated by 8% PAGE.
Procedure for PCR in subsequent rounds. In each selection round, two PCR reactions were
performed, 10-cycle PCR followed by 30-cycle PCR. First, a 100 µL sample was prepared containing the PAGE-separated capture product, 200 pmol of forward primer, 50 pmol of reverse primer, 20 nmol of each dNTP, and 10 µL of 10× Taq polymerase buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, 100 mM (NH4)2SO4, 100 mM KCl, 20 mM MgSO4, and 1% Triton X-100). This sample was cycled 10 times according to the following PCR program: 94 °C for 2 min, 10× (94 °C for 30 s, 47 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s), 72 °C for 5 min. Taq polymerase was removed by phenol/chloroform extraction. Second, a 50 µL sample was prepared containing 1 µL of the 10-cycle PCR product, 100 pmol of forward primer, 25 pmol of reverse primer, 10 nmol of each dNTP, 20 µCi of α-32P-dCTP (800 Ci/mmol), and 5 µL of 10× Taq polymerase buffer. This sample was cycled 30 times according to the following PCR program: 94 °C for 2 min, 30× (94 °C for 30 s, 47 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s), 72 °C for 5 min. Samples were separated by 8% PAGE.
Selection
Figure S38VP1-catalthe yield fcloned rounrandom regCAAYOHAphosphorylactivity wa
Support
progressions
. Progressions lyzed capture r
for the 8VP1-cnds. The CF1, gion, respectiv
AA phosphoryll donor. For th
as undetectable
ting Informati
of the in vitroreaction using tcatalyzed captuCH1, and CK
vely, and pppRlation using a
he EB1 and ECe (<0.5%; 16EB
ion for Walsh
o selection expthe CAAYPAAure reaction us1 selections we
RNA as the phan N30, N40, aC1 selections, tB1 and 8EC1).
h, Sachdeva &
periments. In A substrate as ising the deoxyere for CAAYO
hosphoryl donoand N50 randothe activities a
Silverman, J.
each round, “cillustrated in Fiyribozyme pooOHAA phosphoor. The EA1, Eom region, re
are shown begi
J. Am. Chem. S
control” refersigure S2B, and
ol for that rounorylation usingEB1, and EC1
espectively, aninning with the
Soc. p
s to the yield fd “selection” rend. Arrows mag an N30, N40, a1 selections wend free GTP e last round in
age S6
for the efers to ark the and N50 ere for as the which
Mass spec
Table S1. Masses areproduct wasubstrate (annealed inice for 5 mfrom a 10 mthe sample and 150 mfourth to oPAGE-puriUltrafleXtrPAGE and the plot, esmM HEPEthat the tyindicated k
Support
ctrometry and
MALDI masse tabulated foas prepared frFigure S1), 3n 5 mM HEPE
min. For samplemM stock soluto 20 µL total
mM NaCl. The ne-half of the ified sample wreme; matrix 3subjected to 8
ssentially the sES, pH 7.5, 20 yrosine hydroxykinase deoxyrib
ting Informati
d 8VP1 reactiv
deoxyribo
6CF16CF17CH17CH18CK18CK18EA1
21EB116EC1
s spectrometryor the DNA-Hom a 10 µL s50 pmol of d
ES, pH 7.5, 15 es with GTP asution after annel volume contasample was inproduct band
was desalted by3-hydroxypicol8VP1-catalyzedsame rate and mM MnCl2, ayl group is th
bozyme.
ion for Walsh
vity to establi
ozyme
27 34 02 04 05 28 01
121 103
y and 8VP1 reHEG-CAAYPAsample contain
deoxyribozymemM NaCl, ands the phosphorealing. The DNaining 70 mM Hncubated at 37 was excised, ty Millipore C1
linic acid). Foud reaction withyield of produ
and 150 mM Nhe attachment
h, Sachdeva &
ish phosphory
[M+H]+ calcd.
[
6982.9 66982.9 66982.9 66982.9 66982.9 66982.9 66982.9 66982.9 66982.9 6
eactivity data AA product. Tning 300 pmoe, and 400 pmd 0.1 mM EDTryl donor, the p
NA-catalyzed pHEPES, pH 7.5°C for 14 h a
to suppress ext8 ZipTip and a
ur of the indivh the pppRNA cuct formation w
NaCl at 37 °C; site for the ph
Silverman, J.
ylation produ
[M+H]+
found e
(fou
6982.6 –6982.0 6981.7 6984.8 6982.7 –6981.4 6984.7 6982.2 6986.3
for individualThe DNA-anch
l of DNA-ancmol of pppRNTA by heatingpppRNA was o
phosphorylation5, 0.5 mM ZnC
and separated btraneous signaanalyzed by M
vidual phosphocapture oligonwere observedkobs ca. 0.2 h–
hosphoryl grou
J. Am. Chem. S
uct identities
error, % nd – calcd.) –0.004 –0.01 –0.02 +0.03 –0.003 –0.02 +0.03 –0.01 +0.05
l tyrosine kinahored CAAYPAchored HEG-te
NA phosphorylg at 95 °C for 3omitted and 1 n reaction was Cl2, 20 mM Mby 8% PAGE als due to unreMALDI mass sorylation produnucleotide. In ed as for the YP
1). These data up that was jo
Soc. p
ase deoxyribozAA phosphoryethered CAAYl donor, which3 min and coolmM GTP wasinitiated by brnCl2, 40 mM M(only the loweacted substratespectrometry (Bucts were isolaeach case as shoP positive contrdirectly demo
oined to YOH
age S7
zymes. ylation
YOHAA h were ling on added ringing MgCl2, er one-e). The Bruker ated by own in rol (50 nstrate by the
Sequences
Figure S4deoxyribozspecific x nAll alignmuppermost the far righalignment Alignment nt segmentthat use GT Single-tur
The polynucleMgCl2, ananchored donor wasmin and cand 2 µL DNA-catacontainingother ion mM MnC100 mM Hin 200 mMaliquots thµL stop so50 mM EPAGE anddata direcErrors in k
Support
s of individua
4. Sequences zymes were usnucleotides (x ents show onlysequence; a d
ht is shown (inof all initiallywas performe
t present at theTP as the phosp
rnover deoxyrDNA-anchorotide kinase nd 1 mM spphosphopept
s annealed in ooling on iceof 1 mM GT
alyzed phosphg 70 mM HEPconcentration
Cl2. The Zn2+ HEPES at pHM HNO3. Thehat were all inolution (80%
EDTA, 0.025d quantified wtly to first-orkobs values w
ting Informati
al deoxyriboz
of the initiased as 5′-CGA= 30, 40, or 50y the initially rash denotes a n parentheses) y obtained N30
ed using CLC Se 5′-end of the phoryl donor.
ribozyme assared hexapept(Fermentas),
permidine). Atide substrate5 mM HEPE
e for 5 min. FoTP was addedhorylation rePES, pH 7.5, ns as approprwas added fr
H 7.5; this stoe metal ion stncubated at 3formamide,
% bromophewith a Phosphrder kinetics; ere calculated
ion for Walsh
ymes
ally random AAGCGCTAGAA0) of the initialrandom regiongap. In both sethe number of, N40, and N50
Sequence Viewsequences (bo
ay proceduretide substrat using 10× b
A 10 µL same, 10 pmol ofES, pH 7.5, 15or assays withd from a 10
eaction was i0.5 mM ZnC
riate). The Mrom a 10× stock solution wtocks were ad37 °C. At app1× TBE [89
enol blue, 0.0horImager. Vai.e., yield Y =
d as the stand
h, Sachdeva &
regions of thACAT-Nx-ATAlly random reg. A dot denoteets of sequencf times that se0 deoxyribozymwer using stanoxed in grey).
te was 5′-32
buffer that lample containinf deoxyriboz5 mM NaCl, ah GTP as the mM stock sonitiated by b
Cl2, 20 mM MMn2+ was adde
ock solution cwas freshly prdded last to thpropriate timemM each Tri025% xylenealues of kobs w= Ymax•(1 – e–
dard deviation
Silverman, J.
he new tyrosAGTGAGTCGTAgion as determes conservationes, next to the
equence was fomes that use pdard paramete(B) Unaligned
2P-radiolabeleacks DTT (50ng 0.25 pmo
zyme, and 20and 0.1 mM Ephosphoryl d
olution after abringing the
MnCl2, 40 mMed from a 10×containing 5repared from he final sample points, 2 µLis and boric ae cyanol). Sawere obtained–kt), where k =n from the in
J. Am. Chem. S
sine kinase dATTA-3′, wher
mined through tn, i.e., the samee sequence lengound during clpppRNA as thers. Note the std sequences of
ed using γ-00 mM Tris,ol of 5′-32P-r0 pmol of ppEDTA by headonor, the pppannealing in sample to 20
M MgCl2, and× stock solutmM ZnCl2, 1a 200× stockle, which was
L aliquots weracid and 2 mMamples were d by fitting th= kobs and Yma
ndicated numb
Soc. p
deoxyribozymere Nx representhe selection pre nucleotide asgth in nucleotiloning. (A) Seqhe phosphoryl trongly conservf the deoxyribo
-32P-ATP an, pH 7.6, 100radiolabeled DppRNA phospating at 95 °CpRNA was om8 µL volume
0 µL total vod 150 mM Naion containin10 mM HNOk of 100 mM s divided intore quenched wM EDTA, pHseparated by
he yield versuax is the final
mber of indepe
age S8
es. All nts the rocess. s in the ides on quence donor. ved 11
ozymes
nd T4 0 mM DNA-phoryl
C for 3 mitted e. The olume
aCl (or ng 200 O3, and
ZnCl2 o 2 µL with 5
H 8.3], y 20% us time
yield. endent
determinapoints wer Additiona
Figure S5.conditions:for the six were as fol1.42. 7CH8CK101 00.10, and 8
Support
ations. When re fit to a stra
al data for deo
. Kinetic data : 70 mM HEPEdeoxyribozymllows. 6CF1 de1 deoxyribozy.20, 8CK105 0
8CK133 0.15.
ting Informati
kobs was suffiaight line, and
oxyribozyme k
for tyrosine kiES, pH 7.5, 0.5
mes of Figure 3eoxyribozymes
ymes (N40): 7C0.27, 8CK106
ion for Walsh
iciently low sd kobs was take
kinetics and m
inase deoxyrib5 mM ZnCl2, 20 are included fs (N30): 6CF10
CH102 0.12, 7C0.15, 8CK109
h, Sachdeva &
uch that an een as the slope
metal depend
ozymes that u0 mM MnCl2, for completene01 0.26, 6CF10CH104 0.16, a9 0.11, 8CK11
Silverman, J.
exponential fite of the line.
dence
use pppRNA as40 mM MgCl2
ess and to facil03 0.21, 6CF12and 7CH106 016 0.30, 8CK1
J. Am. Chem. S
t was not mea
s the phosphor2, and 150 mMlitate comparis25 019, 6CF12
0.14. 8CK1 de121 0.085, 8C
Soc. p
aningful, the
ryl donor. IncuM NaCl at 37 °C
sons. kobs value27 0.52, and 6eoxyribozymes
CK128 0.15, 8C
age S9
initial
ubation C. Data es (h–1) CF134 (N50): CK129
Figure S6.Incubation as indicatecombinatiodeoxyriboz
Support
. Metal dependconditions: 70
ed, and 150 mon Mn/Mg hazymes of Figur
ting Informati
dence data for 0 mM HEPES,mM NaCl at 3ad no activityre 3B.
ion for Walsh
tyrosine kinas, pH 7.5, comb37 °C. (A) Day in all case
h, Sachdeva &
se deoxyribozybinations of 0.5ata at t = 24 hs (<0.5%; da
Silverman, J.
ymes that use 5 mM ZnCl2, 2
h as in Figure ata not shown
J. Am. Chem. S
pppRNA as th20 mM MnCl2
3B for all dn). (B) Kinetic
Soc. pa
he phosphoryl 2, and 40 mM
deoxyribozymec plots for th
ge S10
donor. MgCl2
es. The he six
Figure S7HEPES, pHbuffer contwith GTP);different dGTP as the
Support
. Dependence H 7.5, 0–3 mMtributed a fina; the Zn2+ concata sets. (A) D
e phosphoryl do
ting Informati
of tyrosine kinM ZnCl2, 20 mM
l EDTA concecentration in thDeoxyribozymeonor.
ion for Walsh
nase deoxyriboM MnCl2, 40 mentration of 0.0he plots was unes that use ppp
h, Sachdeva &
ozymes on ZnmM MgCl2, and05 mM (for sa
ncorrected for EpRNA as the p
Silverman, J.
n2+ concentratid 150 mM NaCamples with ppEDTA chelatiophosphoryl do
J. Am. Chem. S
on. IncubationCl at 37 °C forppRNA) or 0.
on. Different syonor. (B) Deox
Soc. pa
n conditions: 7r 24 h. The ann04 mM (for saymbols correspxyribozymes th
ge S11
70 mM nealing amples pond to hat use
Figure S8HEPES at NaCl at 37of kobs on bis challengslope is bet
Support
. pH dependenthe indicated p
7 °C. Each databuffer compouning. The straigtween 1.0 and
ting Informati
nce data for thpH for the 1 Ma point is plottend identity (comght lines are fo1.5.
ion for Walsh
he 6CF134 deoM stock solution
ed as mean ± smpare MES ve
or reference and
h, Sachdeva &
oxyribozyme. n, 0.5 mM ZnCstandard deviatersus MOPS atd have slopes
Silverman, J.
Incubation conCl2, 20 mM Mtion (n = 4). Bt pH 6.5), assigof 0.5, 1.0, 1.5
J. Am. Chem. S
nditions: 70 m
MnCl2, 40 mM Because of the gning a single s5, and 2.0. The
Soc. pa
mM MOPS, MMgCl2, and 15apparent depenslope from these best estimate
ge S12
MES, or 50 mM ndence se data
e of the
Dependen
Figure S9.HEPES, pHdependencedeoxyribozsimilarly toboth positiare found strand;6 herlength depeDNA 3′-hydeoxyribozselective amodestly sselective am6CF134: 1.
Support
nce of deoxyri
. Dependence H 7.5, 0.5 mMe. The substratzymes of Figuo 6CF134; all ons flanking that the N-termire this sequencendence. The ydroxyl group zymes, which mong the threelective for themong the three.23, 2.09, 0.80,
ting Informati
ibozyme activ
of deoxyribozyM ZnCl2, 20 mM
te included theure 3 (data for
three deoxyribhe Tyr (Y) resinus of the nace serves as a substrate inclufor phosphoryare representa
ee peptide lenge longer parene peptide lengt, 0.012. 7CH10
ion for Walsh
vities on pept
yme activity oM MnCl2, 40 me indicated pepr 6CF134 and bozymes tolerasidue. The subsatural human rh
test substrate uded the indicaylation. Full kiative of the thgths and also t CAAYAA suths). kobs value02: 0.13, 0.071
h, Sachdeva &
tide and tether
on peptide sequmM MgCl2, antide on a HEG7CH102 are a
ate each of Phestrate with GPhinovirus 14 sthat has a Tyr
ated peptide oninetic plots arehree types of slightly activeubstrate over thes (h–1) were a1, 0.047, ~0. 8C
Silverman, J.
r
uence and lengnd 150 mM NaG tether (t = 24 also in Figuree (F), Glu (E),
PYSGN was evsequence, wher flanked by mn a HEG tethee shown for thbehavior illu
e with the DNhe shorter CYA
as follows, listeCK105: 0.25, 0
J. Am. Chem. S
gth. IncubationaCl at 37 °C. ( h). Data are s
e 4). 6CF127 a, or Lys (K) invaluated becauere the Tyr is many non-Ala rer, or the substhe 6CF134, 7C
ustrated in FigNA 3′-hydroxyl
A and CY subed top to botto0.20, 0.17, ~0.
Soc. pa
n conditions: 7(A) Peptide seqhown here for and 8CK105 bn place of Ala use these amino
attached to anresidues. (B) Ptrate provided CH102, and 8Cgure 4 (6CF13l substrate; 7C
bstrates; 8CK10om for each da
ge S13
70 mM quence all six
behave (A) at
o acids n RNA Peptide only a
CK105 34: not CH102: 05: not ata set.
Figure S10hexapeptidand 150 m(C) 7CH10
Support
0. Dependencede substrate. IncmM NaCl at 302 and 7CH104
ting Informati
of deoxyribozcubation condi37 °C. (A) Str4 deoxyribozym
ion for Walsh
zyme activity oitions: 70 mM ructures of themes. (D) 8CK1
h, Sachdeva &
on length of tethHEPES, pH 7.
e three substra105 and 8CK12
Silverman, J.
ther connecting.5, 0.5 mM ZnCates. (B) 6CF128 deoxyribozy
J. Am. Chem. S
g the DNA ancCl2, 20 mM M127 and 6CF1ymes.
Soc. pa
chor to the CAA
MnCl2, 40 mM M34 deoxyriboz
ge S14
AYAA MgCl2, zymes.
Apparent
Figure S11was assaye150 mM Nplots of ymean ± stankobs values left-hand pfrom initiavalue (i.e., productive coefficientsn = 1 and mn and m. (However, owe conserv16EC103. other combconservativ
Support
Km(GTP) of 8
1. Determininged under incubNaCl, and 0.1–
ield versus timndard deviatiofrom initial-ra
plot in Figure 5al-rate kinetics.
kobs at saturatiGTP binding
s for productivm = 3; the corrA) 8EA101. Fother combinatvatively estimaFitting both abinations of apvely estimate th
ting Informati
8EA101 and
g the apparent Kation condition1000 µM GTPme from 0 to
on, noting that ate kinetics are 5), but all of th. Data were fiing GTP conceg, Ki is the ive and unprodresponding fit vFitting both apptions of appareate that appareapparent K valupparent Km anhat apparent Km
ion for Walsh
16EC103 deo
Km(GTP) of thens of 70 mM HP at 37 °C, witho 2 h; n = 3 some error baslightly differ
he apparent Km
t to kobs = kcat•entration), C isinhibition conductive GTP bvalues of appaparent K valueent Km and Ki aent Km is betwues simultaneo
nd Ki also ledKm is between 2
h, Sachdeva &
oxyribozymes
e 8EA101 and HEPES, pH 7.5h kobs values dat each GTP
ars are smaller ent from those
m values were d[Cn/(Km
n+Cn)]s the GTP concnstant for unp
inding, respecarent Km and Kes simultaneoualso led to acce
ween 12–32 µMously gave Km
to acceptable6–72 µM and a
Silverman, J.
s
16EC103 deox5, 0.5 mM ZnCdetermined from
concentrationthan the sizes
e obtained by fdetermined usi•[1–Cm/(Ki
m+Ccentration, Km
roductive GTctively. Data fo
Ki did not depenusly gave Km =eptable curve f
M and apparenm = 42 ± 7 µM e curve fits, aapparent Ki is b
J. Am. Chem. S
xyribozymes. E
Cl2, 20 mM Mnm initial-rate k
n). The kobs vas of the data pfitting the full ping internally c
Cm)], where kca
is the apparenP binding, an
for each deoxynd strongly on = 20 ± 1 µM afits, as illustratnt Ki is betwee and Ki = 284 s illustrated. Fbetween 245-3
Soc. pa
Each deoxyribnCl2, 40 mM Mkinetics (linearalues are plotoints. The numprogress curveconsistent kobs
at is the apparent Km(GTP) vand n and m aryribozyme fit w
the precise vaand Ki = 240 ±ted. From thesen 200–290 µM± 17 µM. Ho
From these da330 µM.
ge S15
bozyme MgCl2, r fits to tted as merical es (e.g.,
values ent kcat
alue for re Hill well to lues of 4 µM.
se data, M. (B) wever,
ata, we
Supporting Information for Walsh, Sachdeva & Silverman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. page S16
References for Supporting Information (1) Milligan, J. F.; Groebe, D. R.; Witherell, G. W.; Uhlenbeck, O. C. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15, 8783-
8798. (2) (a) Flynn-Charlebois, A.; Wang, Y.; Prior, T. K.; Rashid, I.; Hoadley, K. A.; Coppins, R. L.; Wolf, A.
C.; Silverman, S. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2444-2454. (b) Wang, Y.; Silverman, S. K. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 15252-15263.
(3) Chandrasekar, J.; Silverman, S. K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 5315-5320. (4) Kost, D. M.; Gerdt, J. P.; Pradeepkumar, P. I.; Silverman, S. K. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 4391-
4398. (5) Sachdeva, A.; Chandra, M.; Chandrasekar, J.; Silverman, S. K. ChemBioChem 2012, 13, 654-657. (6) (a) Stanway, G.; Hughes, P. J.; Mountford, R. C.; Minor, P. D.; Almond, J. W. Nucleic Acids Res.
1984, 12, 7859-7875. (b) Werner, G.; Rosenwirth, B.; Bauer, E.; Seifert, J. M.; Werner, F. J.; Besemer, J. J. Virol. 1986, 57, 1084-1093.