Support of BMO for Cheviot Hills CF 14-0656,16-460,16-470 · 3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail -...

3/1/2017 City of Cos Angeles Mail - Support of BMO for Cheviot Hills CF 14-0656, 16-460, 16-470

LA Sharon Dickinson <[email protected]>

Support of BMO for Cheviot Hills CF 14-0656,16-460,16-4701 message

Kerrin Clark <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 8:41 PMTo: Sharon Dickinson <[email protected]>, Sharon Gin <[email protected]>, Zina Cheng <[email protected]>, [email protected]

Re: Support of BMO for Cheviot Hills

Dear Ms. Dickinson, Ms. Gin, Ms. Cheng.

Please see attached document with 5 hand collected signatures of Cheviot residents supporting the new BMO (CF 140656) for Cheviot Hills and opposing R1VNew/2. Signatures on these documents are certified true and correct to the best of my knowledge as I personally contacted each of the signatories at their home addresses listed.

Please enter this document, along with all those provided by Colleen Mason Heller, into the Council File supporting of the BMO (CF 14-0656) for Cheviot Hills, and opposing R1VNew/2 Variation Zones Code Amendment Council File 161470 for Cheviot Hills.

The necessity to take action prior to the expiration of the ICOs, along with the inadequate education, outreach and explanation of the R1 Variation zones and the lack of any independent survey or canvas of the Cheviot Hills neighborhood to receive a comprehensive understanding of community preference, requires any action on R1V designations be postponed until such time as these minimal basic efforts have been made.

Sincerely,Kerrin Clark

BMO Petition signatures.jpeg875K

https://mail.googSG.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim}%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search:=sec... 1/1

mailto:[email protected]






https://mail.googSG.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim%7d%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search:=sec

Stop Mansionization In Cheviot Hills!WE SUPPORT THE BASELINE MAINTENANCE ORDINANCE (“BMP"! FOR CHEVIOT HILLS. The updated BMO is a rational, respectful zoning plan that both removes incentives for developers to target homes in Cheviot Hills for demolition and over-building, and also provides residents with the flexibility to build out. The updated 8MO supports renovation, rebuilding, and additions, while preserving the light, space and privacy between neighboring properties. The updated BMO has been approved citywide as the fairest and most balanced compromise, and we want the same protection from out-of-scale development for Cheviot Hills.

DATE . SIGNATURE NAME AND ADDRESS EMAIL

/nte ' 5 t v'"*■«(.

' " 'j A;7**y * ^

z / a-7 YaA * *1

'' V*i40/j-4

'■’gt A

LIm&U A * A . ^(50

U A'U, LA ifouv

!

1L

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - Not OK!!

Sharon Dickinson <[email protected]>

Not OK!!1 message

Walter Afanasieff <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:53 PMTo: [email protected]

Dear Councilmember,

STRIKE OUT PHRASE OF SECTION 13 NEEDED

There is new proposed language in the BMO/BHO you will voting on this Wednesday (TOMORROW) that would allow 12.24F to be used to evade standards in a way not currently allowed, and not as was originally proposed.

It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. . . . " the BMO/BHO regulations apply.

This is not okay and makes it seem like City Council is trying to sneak last minute changes through to give Conditional Use Permit (CUP) institutions special treatment. Exempting conditionally permitted uses from the BHO/BMO would not be a clarification but rather a significant change from the municipal code.

Please stand up for your constituents and make sure the BMO/BHO actually protects Single-Family Zone Hillside Area Development Standards!!! The City should go back to the original language - strike out section 13 of the current proposal - or go back to the originally proposed section 19 as it was proposed in September 2016.

Your Constituent,

Walter Afanasieff 12985 Galewood St.Studio City CA 91604

https ://mai!.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view-pt&q=(in%3Ainbo>;%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim)%2Dis%3Aurir6acl&name=Unread&search=sec... 1/1




3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - Coldwater canyon parking lot project

Fi LAiMgsGEECS


Coldwater canyon parking lot project1 message

Jonathan Weiss <jondebiweiss@sbcgloba!.net> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:52 PMTo: [email protected]

Dear CounciSmember,STRIKE OUT PHRASE OF SECTION 13 NEEDEDThere is new proposed language in the BMO/BHO you will voting on this Wednesday (TOMORROW) that would allow 12.24F to be used to evade standards in a way not currently allowed, and not as was originally proposed.It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. ..." the BMO/BHO regulations apply.This is not okay and makes it seem like City Council is trying to sneak last minute changes through to give Conditional Use Permit (CUP) institutions special treatment. Exempting conditionally permitted uses from the BHO/BMO would not be a clarification but rather a significant change from the municipal code.Please stand up for your constituents and make sure the BMO/BHO actually protects Single-Family Zone Hillside Area Development Standards!!! The City should go back to the original language - strike out section 13 of the current proposal - or go back to the originally proposed section 19 as it was proposed in September 2016.Your Constituent,Jonathan Weiss 5316 good land Ave Valley village CA 91607

Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Droid

https://mait.goQgle.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&vi©w-pt&q=:(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20iabel%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=;sec... 1/1



https://mait.goQgle.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&vi%c2%a9w-pt&q=:(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20iabel%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=;sec

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - Mansionization amendment

Sharon Dickinson <sharon.dickinson@!acity.org>

Mansionization amendment1 message

Laura Giass <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:06 PMTo: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

I implore the City Council to add an amendment to the BMO and BHO ordinance so that the entire square footage of front-facing garages is calculated as part of the total square footage allowed.

Mansionization has ruined neighborhoods and must be stopped!!

Thank you,

Laura Glass 4307 Babcock Ave.Studio City 91604

https://mail.google.com/mail/iyi/?ui=2&!k=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Amtox%20OR%2Gtabel%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Amread&name=Unread&$earch=sec , 1/1







https://mail.google.com/mail/iyi/?ui=2&!k=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Amtox%20OR%252Gtabel%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Amread&name=Unread&$earch=sec

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - BMO BHO ORDINANCE

Sharon Dickinson <sharon.dickinson@lacity,org>

BMO BHO ORDINANCE1 message

Donna Mann <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:58 PMTo: [email protected]

Dear Counci I member,



It now says: "Except as allowed bv Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code, . . . " the BMO/BHO regulations apply.



Your Constituent,Donna Mann 3970 Van Noord Ave.Studio City, Ca 91604

Sent from my iPad

http$://mail, google, com/maii/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20labei%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec,. , 1/1



3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - Wednesdays vote


Wednesdays vote1 message

Anna Maguire <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:00 PMTo: [email protected]

Dear Sharon Dickinson


There is new proposed language in the BMO/BHO you will voting on this Wednesday (TOMORROW) that would allow 12.24F to be used to evade standards in a way not

currently allowed, and not as was originally proposed.

It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. . . ." the BMO/BHO regulations apply.

This is not okay and makes it seem like City Council is trying to sneak last minute changes through to give Conditional Use Permit (CUP) institutions special treatment.

Exempting conditionally permitted uses from the BHO/BMO would not be a clarification but rather a significant change from the municipal code.

Please stand up for your constituents and make sure the BMO/BHO actually protects Single-Family Zone Hillside Area Development Standards!!! The City should go back to the original language - strike out section 13 of the current proposal - or ao

back to the originally proposed section 19 as it was proposed in September 2016.

Your Constituent,Anna M Maguire

3635 Potosi Ave., Studio City, CA 91604

https7/mail.9Coglecorn/inail/u,1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt4q=(in%3AinbQ):%20OR%20(abet%3A%5eiim)%2CNs%3Amfea(J&rwfri«=UnreaclSiSearch=sec . 1/1




3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - BMO/BHO Ordinance

^Jj. LAe£cs Sharon Dickinson <[email protected]>

BMO/BHO Ordinance1 message

Sue Culhane <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:02 PMReply-To: Sue Culhane <sueculhane@sbcg!obai.net>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <councilmember.ryu@!acity.org>, "[email protected]” <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>

Dear Councilmember,


There is new proposed language in the BMO/BHO you will voting on this Wednesday (TOMORROW) that would allow 12.24F to be used to evade standards in a way not currently

allowed, and not as was originally proposed.

It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code.... ” the BMO/BHO regulations apply.


Please stand up for your constituents and make sure the BMO/BHO actually protects Single-Family Zone Hillside Area Development Standards!!! The City should go

back to the original language - strike out section 13 of the current proposal - or go back to the originally proposed section 19 as it was proposed in September 2016.

Your Constituent,Sue Culhane Studio City

https://maii.goog!e.com/mai!/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Aintox%20OR%20!abel%3A%5Efim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec.., 1/1









https://maii.goog!e.com/mai!/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Aintox%20OR%20!abel%3A%5Efim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec

2/28/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - RE: BHO/BMO vote TOMORROW Wednesday

^GfcECS Sharon Dickinson <[email protected]>V'

RE: BHO/BMO vote TOMORROW Wednesday1 message

Sarah Boyd <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:26 PMRepiy-To: Sarah Boyd <[email protected]>To: ‘'[email protected]" <[email protected]>Cc: "[email protected]" <councilmember.wesson@iacity,org>, Sharon Dickinson <[email protected]>

Dear Councilmember Krekorian,STRIKE OUT OF SECTION 13 PHRASE NEEDED FROM BMO/BHO

There is new proposed language in the BMO/BHO you will voting on TOMORROW that would allow 12.24F to be used to evade standards in a way not currently allowed, and not as was originally proposed.

You should know that it really makes it seem like City Council is trying to sneak last minute

changes through to give CUP institutions SPECIAL TREATMENT.

There are many eyes on this issue -- since it effects all of Los Angeles's hillsides -- however in regards to YOUR VOTE, it effects your council district in particular, in light of the

Harvard-Westtake parking project. As you know this is a project which is out-of-scale for a

hillside environment, seeks numerous zoning exceptions and hillside building exceptions

(grading and excavation greatly in excess of what is allowable) and it is a prime example of a CUP institution looking for SPECIAL TREATMENT from City Council and PLUM.

Please stand up for your constituents and make sure the BMO/BHO actually

protects Single-Family Zone Hillside Area Development Standards!!! The City should go

back to the original language - strike out section 13 of the current proposal - or go back to

the originally proposed section 19 as it was proposed in September 2016.

Your Constituent,Sarah BoydStudio City resident and homeowner

http$://m ail.google.com/mai!/u/1/?ui=2&i k=e0c49b70e2&view= pt&search=inbox&th= 15a87624a305c33f&siml=15a87624a305c33f 1/2








2/28/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - RE: BHO/BMO vote TOMORROW Wednesday -

>jt ;f: ^ ^ 5(« ^ >f< ^ ^ ^

Sarah [email protected](818) 687-6286 c.^ ^ ^ n|^ sjy v|^ J«|y v|/ vj,^

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15a87624a305c33f&siml-15a87624a305c33f 2/2


https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15a87624a305c33f&siml-15a87624a305c33f

2/28/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - BMO/BHO

If LAGEECS


BMO/BHO1 message

Jeffrey Jacobs <jjacobs9@ao!.com> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 ai 5:00 PMTo: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Cc: [email protected]

Dear Councilmember,

STRIKE OUT OF SECTION 13 PHRASE NEEDED FROM BMO/BHO



It now says: "Except as allowed bv Section 12,24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. ... 11 theBMO/BHO regulations apply.

This is not okay and makes it seem like City Council is trying to sneak last minute changes through to give Conditional Use Permit (CUP) institutions special treatment. Exempting conditionally permitted uses from the BHO/BMO would not be a clarification but rather a

significant change from the way the code is now.



Cordially,

Jeffrey District 2

S■ facolU

Attorney at Law

Phone: 818-S85-3399

https ://mail.goog!e.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15a87623ca676d3d&$imM5a87623ca676ci3d 1/2








2/28/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - 8MO/BHO

Fax: 818-995-3399

Email: [email protected]

avast This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&$earch-inbox8tth=15a87623ca676d3d&siml=:15a87623ca676d3d 2/2


http://www.avast.com

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&$earch-inbox8tth=15a87623ca676d3d&siml=:15a87623ca676d3d

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mai! - BMO/BHO Ordinance

LAgig, GEECS


BMO/BHO Ordinance1 message

Jeff Stuart <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:47 PMRepiy-To: Jeff Stuart <[email protected]>To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Some new language that would allow folks to evade the standards you have carefully drafted for the BMO/BHO Ordinance has crept into the picture, and we need to get it out of there.

It seems like there are always people who think laws that apply to everyone should make exceptions for them, and those exceptions can seep into proposals like this one, and now, more than ever, we need to be FAIR. So:

The new proposed language in the BMO/BHO you will vote on this tomorrow would allow 12.24F to be used to evade standards in a way not currently allowed, and not as was originally proposed.

It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code..."the BMO/BHO regulations apply.

This is not okay, and makes it seem like someone or some agency is trying to sneak last minute changes through to give Conditional Use Permit (CUP) institutions special treatment. (This is what I mean. Someone wants the rules you make for EVERYONE to not apply to them.)

Exempting conditionally permitted uses from the BHO/BMO would not be a clarification, but rather a significant change from the municipal code.

Please stand up for your constituents and make sure the BMO/BHO actually protects Single-Family Zone Hillside Area Development Standards.

The City should go back to the original language - strike out section 13 of the current proposal - or go back to the originally proposed section 19 as it was proposed in September 2016.

Thanks for your time, and fairness.

Jeff Stuart4106 Alcove AvenueStudio City

Howdy folks,

https://mail.googSe.com/maii/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&v!6w=pt&q-(in%3A!nbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim}%20is%3Aunread&name=Unreaci&search=sec... 1/1









https://mail.googSe.com/maii/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&v!6w=pt&q-(in%3A!nbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim%7d%20is%3Aunread&name=Unreaci&search=sec



BMO/BHO1 message

Maria Elena Laas <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:05 PMTo: [email protected]

Dear Councilmember Dickinson,



It now says: "Except as allowed bv Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. . . . " the BMO/BHO regulations apply.


Please stand up for your constituents and make sure the BMO/BHO actually protects Single-Family Zone Hillside Area Development Standards! The City should go back to the original language - strike out section 13 of the current proposal - or go back to the originally proposed section 19 as it was proposed in September 2016.

Your Constituent,Maria McQuhae-Laas 3928 Fairway Ave Studio City, 91604

Sent from the future

tiaps://ma!l.google,com/mai!/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20labei%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3AunreadSlname=Unread&search=sec... 1/1




3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - RE: BMO/BHO City Council Vote on March 1

K-m. LA ^ Sharon Dickinson <[email protected]>

RE: BMO/BHO City Council Vote on March 11 message

Andrew Ferrell <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:14 PMBcc: [email protected]

Dear Coimcilmember,


There is new proposed language in the BMO/BHO you will voting on this Wednesday (TOMORROW) that would allow 12.24F to be used to evade standards in a way

not currently allowed, and not as was originally proposed.

It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code... . " theBMO/BHO regulations apply.


significant change from the municipal code.



Your Constituent, Andrew Ferrell

10619 Landale St. Apt. 205 North Hollywood, CA 91602

https://mai!.goog!e.com/mail/u/1/?uj=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q={in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5E!im)%20is%3Aunread&namG=Unr6ad&seafch=sec... 1/1




https://mai!.goog!e.com/mail/u/1/?uj=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=%7bin%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5E!im)%20is%3Aunread&namG=Unr6ad&seafch=sec

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - BMO/BHO Ordinance From No Litter Zone and Angry Constituent

GEECSSharon Dickinson <[email protected]>

BMO/BHO Ordinance From No Litter Zone and Angry Constitutent1 message

Jackie Hunsicker <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:34 PMTo: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], ,'amoldtheprinterdslextreme.com,, <[email protected]>, [email protected]

Dear CouncilMembers:




it now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code,. .. " theBMO/BHO regulations apply.


significant change from the municipal code. IT IS OUTRAGEOUS.



Your Constituent,Jackie Hunsicker

3251 Coldwater Canyon Avenue, Studio City, CA 91604

Have been serving the Cotdwater/Mulholland/ Laurel Canyon Community unpaid for eight years with No Litter Zone. Recently we received a grant from Clean Street Initiative. Thank

you so much for sticking up for us.

fittps://mail,google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q={in%3Ainbox%20OR%20iabel%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec... 1/1








3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mai! - BHO/BHO ordinance language change—meeting tomorrow

If''LA§oGEECS


BHO/BHO ordinance language change-meeting tomorrow1 message

[email protected] <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:34 PMTo: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Dear Councilmember,



It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code.. . . " theBMO/BHO regulations apply.



Your Constituent,Thomas Perry3730 Mound View AvenueStudio City, CA91604

https://mai!.goog!e.com/nnail/u/1/?ui-2&ik-e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20labe!%3A%5Eiim}%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&s6arch=sec... 1/1









https://mai!.goog!e.com/nnail/u/1/?ui-2&ik-e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20labe!%3A%5Eiim%7d%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&s6arch=sec

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - STRIKE OUT PHRASE OF SECTION 13 NEEDED


STRIKE OUT PHRASE OF SECTION 13 NEEDED1 message

Jack Bornoff <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:33 PMReply-To: Jack Bornoff <[email protected]>To: [email protected]

Dear Councilmember,



It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. ..." the BMO/BHO regulations apply.



Your Constituent,Jack Bornoff 4217 Ethel Ave.Studio City, 91604

https://maiLgoogle.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Airibox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiiin)%20is%3AunrGad&name=Unread&search=sec... 1/1





https://maiLgoogle.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Airibox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiiin)%20is%3AunrGad&name=Unread&search=sec

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - BHO/BMO ordinance language change

Sharon Dickinson <sharon,dickinson@!acity.org>

BHO/BMO ordinance language change1 message

Jo Perry <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:26 PMTo: Council Member Krekorian <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], "[email protected] <[email protected]>, cc: [email protected]” <[email protected]>, [email protected]

Dear Counci!member,

STRIKE OUT PHRASE OF SECTION 13, PLEASE!


It now says; 11 Except as allowed bv Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. . . . ' the BMO/BHO regulations apply.

This is not okay and makes it seem like City Council is trying to sneak last minute changes through to give Conditional Use Permit (CUP) institutions special treatment Exempting conditionally permitted uses from the BHO/BMO would not be a clarification but rather a significant change from the municipal code.


Sincerely,

Dr. Jo Perry Studio City

htk>s://mail,goog!e.com/mai]/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e26tview=pt&q-(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20!abel%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec... 1/1









3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - FW: Save Coldwater Canyon

0GEECSSharon Dickinson <[email protected]>

FW: Save Coldwater Canyon1 message

Sandra Lucchest <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:23 PMTo: ''[email protected]" <[email protected]>

Dear Sharon Dickinson

/ hope that you will hear my voice in saving Coldwater Canyon.

Los Angeles has been deemed the #f traffic capital of the US. Coldwater Canyon is an extremely important artery for so many working commuters. As it stands, it takes me a

good 50 minutes to travel from Ventura Blvd to Beverly Blvd and back. If Harvard-Westlake gets their way, they will be impeding my travel time astronomically. This feels like a very selfish and arrogant step by the school who want more parking spaces for their students

who should be learning the important values of maintaining ecological balance and learning to be thoughtful about the neighborhood that their school exists in. It’s hard for

me to understand why this is even a consideration.




ft now says: "Except as allowed bv Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. . . . “ theBMO/BHO regulations apply.




fittps://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?u!=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(pn%3Ainbox%20OR%20!at)el%3A%5Eiim}%20i$%3Aunread&name-Unread&search-sec... 1/2





3/1/2017

back to the original language - strike out section 13 of the current proposal - or go back to the originally proposed section 19 as it was proposed In September 2016.

City of Los Angeles Mail - FW: Save Coldwater Canyon

! hope you listen to your hard working constituents.

Your Constituent,

Sandra Lucchesi

13435 Cheltenham Dr.

Sherman Oaks

GershSANDRA LUCCHES! j Senior Vice President

[email protected]

9465 Wilshire Blvd, 6th Floor, Beverly Hills, CA 90212

tel: 310-205-5872

https://mail.google.com/maii/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3A!nbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name-Unread&search=sec... 2/2


https://mail.google.com/maii/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3A!nbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name-Unread&search=sec

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - BMO/BHO Ordiance

Sharon Dickinson <sharon,[email protected]>

BMO/BHO Ordiance1 message

Susan Jacobs <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:57 PMTo: [email protected], Council Member Krekorian <Councilmember.Krekorian@lacity,org>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Dear Councilmember,



It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. ... " the BMO/BHO regulations apply.



Your Constituent,Susan Jacobs, Studio City

Susan Jacobs susanj719@ic!oud. com

https://mail.goog!e.com/mal/u/1/?ui=2&!k=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20labei%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec... 1/1







https://mail.goog!e.com/mal/u/1/?ui=2&!k=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20labei%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec


^^J*GEECS Sharon Dickinson <[email protected]>


William Nix <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:53 PMTo: [email protected]

Dear Councilmember Dickinson,


There is new proposed language in the BMO/BHO you wilt voting on this Wednesday (TOMORROW) that would allow 12.24F to be used to evade standards in a way not currently


It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code.. .. " theBMO/BHO regulations apply.





Your Constituent,

William Nix

3957 Goodland Place

Studio City, CA 91604

818.763.0374 (Tel)

Mlps/Anail.google.com/mail/u/1/7ui=2&ik=eOc49b70e2&view=pl&q=(in%3Aintx»%200R%20latel%3A%SEiiin)%20is%3Aunread&namesUniea(1&search=sec... 1/2





818.788.7406 (Fax)

Please consider the environment and whether you need to print this email.

https://mail,googte.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&k=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20!at»l%3A%5Eiim}%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec... 2/2

https://mail,googte.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&k=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20!at%c2%bbl%3A%5Eiim%7d%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec


LAGEECS


BMO/BHO1 message

Sarah Whistler <[email protected]> To: [email protected]

Tue, Feb 28. 2017 at 8:50 PM

Dear Councilmember,


There is new proposed language in the BMO/BHO you will voting on this Wednesday (TOMORROW) that would allow 12.24F to be used to evade

standards in a way not currently allowed, and not as was originallyproposed.

It now says: "Except as allowed bv Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code___ w the BMO/BHO regulations apply.

This is not okay and makes it seem like City Council is trying to sneak last minute changes through to give Conditional Use Permit (CUP)

institutions special treatment. Exempting conditionally permitted uses from the BHO/BMO would not be a clarification but rather a significant

change from the municipal code.

Please stand up for your constituents and make sure the BMO/BHO actually protects Single-Family Zone Hillside Area Development

Standards!!! The City should go back to the original language ■ strike out section 13 of the current proposal - or ao back to the originally proposed

section 19 as it was proposed in September 2016.

Your Constituent, Sarah Whistler

4422 Kraft Avenue Studio City, CA 91602

htlps7/mail.google.coni/mal/iV1/?ij=28jk=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&qF(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20labe1%3A%5Eiim)%20<s%3Aurifea(J&name=Unre3ct&S6afch=sec .. 1/1





Sharon Dickinson <sharon.dickinson@iacity,org>


Andrew Lasken <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:36 PMTo: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Dear Councilmember,




It now says: "Except as allowed bv Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code.. . . " theBMO/BHO regulations apply.





Your Constituent, Andrew Lasken

3696 Dixie Canyon Ave. Sherman Oaks, CA 91423

https://mai!.goog!e.com/mai]/u/1/?ui=28fk=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim}%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec.., 1/1







https://mai!.goog!e.com/mai%5d/u/1/?ui=28fk=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim%7d%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeies Maif - Harvard Westlake / Coidwater Canyon


Harvard Westlake / Coidwater Canyon1 message

Deborah Ambrosino <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28. 2017 at 7:19 PMTo: [email protected]

Dear Councilmember,



It now says: "Except as allowed bv Section 12.24 F and 14,00 A of this Code. . . . " the BMO/BHO regulations apply.



Your Constituent,

Deborah Ambrosino 4016 Alta Mesa Dr Studio City CA 91604

https://mai!.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik-e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20!abel%3A%5Eiim}%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec... 1/1




https://mai!.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik-e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20!abel%3A%5Eiim%7d%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec

Dear Councilmember,


There is new proposed language in the BMO/BHO you

will voting on this Wednesday (TOMORROW) that

would allow 12.24F to be used to evade standards in a

way not currently allowed, and not as was originally

proposed.

It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F

and 14.00 A of this Code. . . . "the BMO/BHO

regulations apply.

This is not okay and makes it seem like City Council is

trying to sneak last minute changes through to give

Conditional Use Permit (CUP) institutions special

treatment Exempting conditionally permitted uses

from the BHO/BMO would not be a clarification but

rather a significant change from the municipal code.

Please stand up for your constituents and make sure

the BMO/BHO actually protects Single-Family Zone

Hillside Area Development Standards!!! The Cityshould go back to the original language - strike out

section 13 of the current proposal - or go back to the originally proposed section 19 as it was proposed in

September 2016.

Your Constituent,

Anne Mosell

4033 van noord ave

studio city 91604


LA Sharon Dickinson <[email protected]>


Atwater, Julie <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:17 PMTo: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>

Dear Councilmember,






Your Constituent,Julie Atwater 3944 Van Noord Ave studio city CA 91604

Sent from my iPhone

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20iabei%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec.., 1/1













https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20iabei%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - Don't sneak last minute changes into BMO/BHO

1' LA " GEECS


Don't sneak last minute changes into BMO/BHO1 message

Karen Brooks <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 8:21 PMTo: [email protected]




it now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. . . . " theBMO/BHO regulations apply.





Your Constituent,Karen Brooks

11521 Canton Drive, Studio City 91604

karenxb rooks@g mail.com iandiine 818,760.3356 mobile 818.517.4357

htfps://ma!l.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view-pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&seafch=sec... 1/1




3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - Tomorrow's vote


Tomorrow's vote1 message

Jon Boorstin <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 8:32 PMTo: [email protected]

Dear Councilmember,




It now says: ”Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code.. . . " theBMO/BHO regulations apply.





Your constituent.

Jon Boorstin 4007 Avenida del Sol

Studio City 91604

http$://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=eOc49b70e2&view=p(&q=(in%3Ainbox%200R%20label%3A%SEiim)%20is%3Aunreac1&n3me=Unreacl&search=sec... 1/1




3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - City Council Vote on March 1, 2017 re: BMO/BHO Ordinance


City Council Vote on March 1, 2017 re: BMO/BHO Ordinance1 message

Laurie Cohn <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 8:41 PMTo: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]

Dear Councilmember Krekorian:



it now says: "Except as allowed bv Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code.., . " the BMO/BHO regulations apply.



Thank you.

Your constituent,

LouArLe; Coh-w

422 7 'dellcu/.'-eyAvey

StudAo- C Cty, CA 916 OA

818-985-7788

hftps://mail.google.com/maii/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q-(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20iabel%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=:Unread&search=sec.., 1/2





3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - City Council Vote on March 1, 2017 re: BMO/BHO Ordinance

Ef avast This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

https://mail.goog!e.corn/mai!/u/1/?u!=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ambox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim}%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec... 2/2


https://mail.goog!e.corn/mai!/u/1/?u!=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ambox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim%7d%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - BMO/BHO vote March 1, 2017


BMO/BHO vote March 1, 20172 messages

Laurie Cohn <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 8:43 PMTo: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]

Dear Councilmember Wesson:



it now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. ,,, " the BMO/BHO regulations apply.


Please stand up for your constituents and make sure the BMO/BHO actually protects Single-Family Zone Hillside Area Development Standards!!! The City should go back to the original language - strike out section 13 of the current proposal - or go back to the originally proposed section 19 as it was proposed in September 2016,

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Lcuwie/ Cohn/

422 7 ‘BeJloUre'Aves

Studio-City, CA 91604-

SI 8-985-2865

https://mail.goog!e.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20Sabel%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec... 1/3




https://mail.goog!e.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20Sabel%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec


JjJ avast This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.www.avast.com

Laurie Cohn <imarbe@sbcg!obal.net> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 8:45 PMTo: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]

Dear Councilmember Ryu:



it now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. .. . " the BMO/BHO regulations apply.



Thank you.

Sincerely,

https://matl.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2SL!k=eOc49b70e2&view=:pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%200R%20label%3A%5Eiim}%20is%3Aunreaci&name=Unread&searc!i=sec..- 2/3




https://matl.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2SL!k=eOc49b70e2&view=:pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%200R%20label%3A%5Eiim%7d%20is%3Aunreaci&name=Unread&searc!i=sec..-


Icumrie/ Cohn/

422 7 'BeXLcuA/e^Ave/

Studio-City, CA 91601

818-985-2865


https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c4@b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20iabei%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec... 3/3


https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c4@b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20iabei%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec



BMO/BHO vote March 1, 20171 message

Laurie Cohn <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 8:45 PMTo: [email protected]: [email protected]

Dear Councilmember Koretz:



it now says: "Except as allowed bv Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. ... " the BMO/BHO regulations apply.


Please stand up for your constituents and make sure the BMO/BHO actually protects Single-Family Zone Hillside Area Development Standards!!! The City should go back to the original language - strike out section 13 of the current proposal - or go back to the originally proposed section IS as it was proposed in September 2016.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

LoA^rie/ CohiA/

^227

StudAxrCoty, CA 9160^

818-985-2865

https://inaiLgoogle.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view-pi&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20labe!%3A%5Eiirn)%20is%3Aunread&name=:Unread&search=sec... 1/2





https://inaiLgoogle.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view-pi&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20labe!%3A%5Eiirn)%20is%3Aunread&name=:Unread&search=sec

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - BMO/BHO vote March 1,2017


https://maiLgoogle.com/mail/a/1/7ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3A!nbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunreacf&name=Unfead&search=sec... 2/2


https://maiLgoogle.com/mail/a/1/7ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3A!nbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunreacf&name=Unfead&search=sec

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - BMO/BHO - Strikeout phrase of section 13 needed!


BMO/BHO - Strike out phrase of section 13 needed!1 message

555lrb <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 8:57 PMTo: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Dear Councilmember,

There is new proposed language in the BMO/BHO you will be voting on this Wednesday, 3/1/17, that would allow 12.24F to be used to evade standards in a way not currently allowed, and not as was originally proposed.

It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24F and 14.Q0A of this Code..." the BMO/BHO regulations apply.

This is not okay, and makes it seem like City Council is trying to sneak last minute changes through to give Conditional Use Permit (CUP) institutions special treatment. Exempting conditionally permitted uses from the BHO/BMO would not be a clarification, but rather a significant change from the municipal code.

Please stand up for your constituents and make sure the BMO/BHO actually protects Single-Family Zone Hillside Area Development Standards! The City should go back to the original language -- strike out section 13 of the current proposal - or go back to the originally proposed Section 19 as it was proposed in September 2016.

Thank you,Lawrence Broch and Susan Dickes 3961 Alcove Ave.Studio City, CA 91604

tittps://mail.google.conn/mail/u/1/?ui-2&ik:=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5E)im)%20is%3Aunr6ad&name;:Unrea(J&search=sec... 1/1







3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - BHO VOTE -STRIKE OUT 11th hour SECTION 13 LANGUAGE

bG£ECSSharon Dickinson <[email protected]>

BHO VOTE -STRIKE OUT 11th hour SECTION 13 LANGUAGE1 message

Jennifer Rothman <j [email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:10 PMTo: [email protected]: [email protected], [email protected]

Dear Councilmember Krekorian,

Please STRIKE OUT the unlawfully added language to SECTION 13, subsection 12.24F of BMO/BEIO to be voted on tomorrow (Wednesday, March 1st). The new proposed language exempts CUP institutions and affords them special treatment. This last-minute change to 12.24 allows these institutions to evade standards in a way not currently allowed, and was not what was originally proposed nor what the public was given NOTICE for in advance of the vote.

It is bad policy and dangerous to exempt these institutions. Granting exemptions from the BMO and BHO to CUP uses would be a dramatic change. The language in the original ordinances clearly states that the code is intended for ALL residential lots. Conditional uses in residential areas are not allowed and should NOT be granted special exemptions from BMO/BHO restrictions as they locate or expand in such a zone. Exempting conditionally permitted uses from the BHO/BMO would not be a clarification but a significant and radical alteration from the current Los Angeles Municipal Code.

In addition, the last minute change WITHOUT NOTICE is unlawful and unethical. It also suggests inappropriate back-room dealing and suspicious favorable treatment given to these institutions.

This affects your council district in particular, in light of the proposed Harvard-Westlake parking project for which you have still not taken any position. As you know this is a project which is out-of-scale for a hillside environment, seeks numerous zoning exceptions and hillside building exceptions (grading and excavation greatly in excess of what is allowable) and it is a prime example of a CUP institution looking for SPECIAL TREATMENT from City Council and PLUM.

This 11 th hour language, that CUP institutions likely tried to sneak in, is an unacceptable backdoor effort to get this and similar projects through that are currently expressly disallowed. An without an appropriate comment period and time for disucssion.

https://maiLgoogle.com/mai!/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q={in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim}%20is%3Amread&name=Unread&search=sec... 1/2






https://maiLgoogle.com/mai!/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=%7bin%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim%7d%20is%3Amread&name=Unread&search=sec

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - BHO VOTE -STRIKE OUT 11th hour SECTION 13 LANGUAGE

Your constituents are counting on you to step up and do the right thing-protect the hillsides and residential communities from destructive overdevelopment.

It is your duty to make sure the BMO/BHO protects Single-Family Zone Hillside Area Development Standards. The City should put back the original language - strike out section 13 of the current proposal - or go back to the originally proposed section 19 as it was proposed in September 2016.

Jennifer Rothman, Esq.

Studio City resident and homeowner, 91604

hftps://mail.goog!e.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c4Sb70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20labei%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&seafch=sec..,

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - Tomorrow's vote

GEECSSharon Dickinson <sharon,[email protected]>

Tomorrow's vote1 message

Snow Mercy <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:50 PMTo: [email protected]

Dear Councilmember,



It now says: '*Except as allowed bv Section 12,24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. . . . " the BMO/BHO regulations apply.


Please stand up for your constituents and make sure the BMO/BHO actually protects Single-Family Zone Hillside Area Development Standards!!! The City should ao back to the original language - strike out section 13 of the current proposal - or go back to the originally proposed section 19 as it was proposed in September 2016.

Your Constituent,Dr. Sarah Villa3454 Coidwater Canyon AveStudio City, CA 91604

https://ma!l.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pl&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5E!im)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec.,. 1/1




https://ma!l.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pl&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5E!im)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec


HI .LA »3«ecs

Sharon Dickinson <sharon,[email protected]>


Mike Kichaven <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 8:11 PMTo: [email protected], Paul Krekorian <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Dear Councilmember,



It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. . . . " the BMO/BHO regulations apply.



Mike Kichaven 4129 Greenbush Av. Sherman Oaks, Ca. 91423 [email protected]

https://mail.9oogfs.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&$earch=sec.,. 1/1









https://mail.9oogfs.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&$earch=sec

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeies Mail - Re: Strike out Phrase of §13


Re: Strike out Phrase of §131 message

John Schouweiier <john.schouweiler@gmaiLcom> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:31 PMTo: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Dear Council member,

There is new proposed language in the BMO/BHO you will voting on tomorrow that would allow 12.24F to be used to evade standards in a way not currently allowed, and not as was originally proposed. It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code...." the BMO/BHO regulations apply.

This is not okay and makes it seem like City Council is trying to sneak last minute changes through to give Conditional Use Permit (CUP) institutions special treatment. Exempting conditionally permitted uses from the BHO/BMO would not be a clarificationbut rather a significant change from the municipal code.

Please stand up for your constituents and make sure the BMO/BHO actually protects Single-Family Zone Hillside Area Development Standards. The City should go hack to the original language - strike out §13 of the current proposal - or go back to the originally proposed section 19 as it was proposed in September 2016.

Your Constituent,John Schouweiier 3944 Vantage Avenue Studio City, CA 91604 818.679.3550 (mobile)

THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE AND ITS CONTENTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS PRIVACY ACT, 18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 2510-2521 AND ARE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION THAT IS INTENDED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, COPYING OR OTHER USE OF THIS MESSAGE AND ITS CONTENTS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY SENDER IMMEDIATELY BY REPLY E-MAIL AT [email protected] AND DELETE THE MESSAGE. THANK YOU.

htlps://mail,google.com/mail/u/1/?u=2&!k=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Aintiox%20OR%20labei%3A%5Eiim}%20is%3Aunread&name=UnrGad&search=sec... 1/1








3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - PLEASE; Strike out Phrase of Section 13

R E LA Sharon Dickinson <[email protected]>GEECS

PLEASE: Strike out Phrase of Section 131 message

Susan Goldberg <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:45 PMTo: [email protected]

Dear Co unci I mem bee


allowed, and not as was originally proposed. It now says:

"Except as allowed bv Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code.... 11 the BMO/BHOregulations apply.

This is not okay and makes it seem like City Council is trying to sneak last minute changes through to give Conditional Use Permit (CUP) institutions special treatment. Exempting

conditionally permitted uses from the BHO/BMO would not be a clarification but rather a significantchange from the municipal code.

Please stand up for your constituents and make sure the BMO/BHO actually protects SingleFamily Zone Hillside Area Development Standards! II The City should go back to the original

language - strike out section 13 of the current proposal- or go back to the originally proposedsection 19 as it was proposed in 2016.

Sincerely,

Susan Goldberg, 4001 Avenida del Sol


Virus-free, www.avast.com

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3/^nbox%20OR%20!abel%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unr6ad&search-sec... 1/2





https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%253/%5enbox%20OR%20!abel%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unr6ad&search-sec

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - PLEASE: Strike out Phrase of Section 13

https ://mail.googie.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(tn%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec...


Iq geecsSharon Dickinson <[email protected]>

STRIKE OUT PHRASE OF SECTION 13 NEEDED5 messages

Sari & Arden Rynew <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:10 PMTo: [email protected]

Dear Council Pres. Wesson,




It now says: "Except as allowed bv Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. . . . theBMO/BHO regulations apply.



Please stand up for your constituents and make sure the BMO/BHO actually protects Single-Family Zone Hillside Area Development Standards!!! The City should ao


Your Constituent, Arden & Sari Rynew

Sari & Arden Rynew 13027 Galewood Street Studio City, Ca. 91604-4048

818 501-7906 [email protected]

Sari & Arden Rynew <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:10 PMTo: Councilmember Paul Krekorian <[email protected]>

Dear Councilmember Krekorian,


haps://mail.googl6.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%201abel%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec.., 1/4










It now says: "Except as allowed bv Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. . . . " theBMO/BHO regulations apply.









Dear Councilmember Ryu,




It now says: “Except as allowed bv Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code.. . . " theBMO/BHO regulations apply.




hltpSj'/mail.9O0gl6.com/mail/iV1/?ui=2&it(=e0c49b70e2&view=pl&q=<ifl%3Airibcw%20OR%20<abel%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunreact&name=UfV9ac1SLSearch»sec... 2/4




3/1/2017


City of Los Angeles Mail - STRIKE OUT PHRASE OF SECTION 13 NEEOEO


Sari & Arden Rynew 13027 Galewood Street Studio City, Ca. 91604*4048



Dear Councilmember Korctz,




It now says: **Except as allowed bv Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. . . . " theBMO/BHO regulations apply.








Sari & Arden Rynew <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28. 2017 at 10:11 PMTo: [email protected]

h«ps://matl.9Oogie.corn/iria<l/(Vir?ui=2&ik=e0c49j70e2&view=pt&q=<jn%3Ainbox%20OR%20tabel%3A%5Eiirift)%20is%3AunreadSjiame=Unreed&soarch=sec... 3/4






3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mai - STRIKE OUT PHRASE OF SECTION 13 NEEDED

Sharon Dickinson,




It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. . . . " theBMO/BHO regulations apply.








ht1ps7/mail.9oog1e.conn/mail/iV1/?ui=2&ik=eOc49b7O62&view=pt&q=(jn%3Ajnbc>x%2OOR%2O<abet%3A%5Eiim)%2O<s%3Aunr0a(ianam«=UnfeaJ&search=sec. .. 4/4


3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - BMO/BHO - DELETE SECTION 13


BMO/BHO ~ DELETE SECTION 131 message

Suellen Wagner <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 5:16 PMTo: [email protected]

Dear Ms. Dickinson,

BMO/BHO - STRIKE OUT OF SECTION 13 PHRASE NEEDED

There is new proposed language in the BMO/BHO to be voted on this Wednesday (TOMORROW) that would allow 12.24F to be used to evade standards in a way not currently


It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code,... " theBMO/BHO regulations apply.

This is inappropriate and makes it seem like City Council is trying to sneak last minute changes through to give Conditional Use Permit (CUP) institutions special treatment.

Exempting conditionally permitted uses from the BHO/BMO would not be a clarification but rather a significant change from the way the code is written now.



CD2 Constituent Suellen Wagner

12184 Laurel Terrace Dr. Studio City, CA 91604

htfps://mail.goog!e.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=:e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20iabel%i3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Ajjnread&name=Unread&searcli=s6c... 1/1




I f~j&"P /^~/f who ||ves 3t;/#</*? ’TVLUCA X/9Me. /h/e. 7DumLA**nnCfffa&T—

Address City Zip Code

Support. Councilman. David Ryu's motion to designate 2 acres of the Bob Hope Estate located at 10350 W. Moorpark St, Totuca Lake. CA 91602 as a "Historic Cultural Monument" under the procedures of Section 22.17.10 of the Administrative Code. See Below:

VI (I I Ml N | i,

Shi-wU ■'< r ifru tîitti- -i “rdrjif ninf>Mih1 iunl.r rfimi‘J-ri(.i f-Mim- "-r-rri rfr ""i 'j • i.............J~rr~rif~'~

r m rYY~ rl*rtir~i T"în~i^*~-~ ' " * —*‘~ripiT~i**it C rmal drtigwiirn. In A* Ifpm **

OMMd

OttNikk—k wwi UtoRyt«WM4 m . TuhMltto.CA.WMft W* o*»r *n™*n«dy‘•—*irin î------ • - ---- - n“^rTtif>ili(iir'ifchrilikiiiinntJ‘irjf‘Tr1—tr~ ! ‘ i'rMl—Mwllwaek Ilf mi «a*Hl^y*rw< tee* l» !>*«»*»*«*.*■. 1—oMw

"*r 'Mk*in‘...................... — - —ri*i ' v~MlkphMK TUW»a »wtk »«•*»** >M lug* t*****t* **< aMTOW fr**tmAiynûi> 11* Brtf *°<> ^>*4 lanfe

I* i nygp Âklt si c Ijm i 7*0 frr fid*fdUfiytCtWatnUnA»i*k k**w Vwj-JwMflIRMtt*IIl»efa* »****■»»«f* >Pi*«r< eiwmf&urn lumm m Ou «T> hJ—gy. IW JrtO A<*1i«pi MtôtlLiwM at •.«*», »*i».

■•■Aartf IgaftkwIMt•mlmpMnM hriblMiHWi-nafa ■*». knu*<* T«Imi late*

rwr»fcarii< m l» tWrtjjA.

I nmfeKlIkE MOVtiteildafkiuf^M TO. «l[iiaii »dh ryfîTi1* rf*i*>~r*'iinr?i.,*j*« *i iwl*e^ll— illp I!>•»<■»**ffc«fc*ni iMu hlmwww rf «r Cl* (totf ■****» * *t panN ■» nr** ta wa*r««n| nh^

I IUUMUI M(M *» *f Owl «*■**■*-* ** ** *Uf* tm*. yrnm* #i*wwnM»itemT<wWi CA»mtncitiihii»f*iiiii*prt u|eh»|Mi4«Mfladil>tt.l1l i|W^*Mmw*nC4.»MwnidlMftâ| H||U ■ iMfrcrr a* tlMim<Vwtf IV#MWW*ifT*>ua»>fwmwwMlleplMM *r*« Ufertl HrtlMcC < MMM

limittt.MC*'* e»ur«iivHW«tti(fiKU>«vaiOiMNaita^riffTtfcain*nih^t“ Ytm r-*-1----- ------------- ,~t~'*-|'*---‘- ■hifi fiwltl<C«ftfe<i.i:H*nst'd*wl)k'miw

noi-nfl.d. OskP. /. \. . -.* fiWfcmu -

V-’ t'tMhM*. P lt««M

.ir mmmd

jt ^

L/Mq ________Signature v J ,

b(&(0^ St_________ /fcpdScJ/n@yjLlv*f^/iEmail /Phone Number

Email to Councilman David Ryu: sharon dirkinson iflHa ciiv.ory CC: a1lcn.rfUhiaiacitv r.ry Or FAX: 211'978*104D


$«KSSharon Dickinson <[email protected]>

BMO/BHO1 message

Ruth Wald <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:14 PMTo: [email protected]

Dear Councilmember,




It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code... . " theBMO/BHO regulations apply.




back to the original language - strike out section 13 of the current proposal - or qo back to the originally proposed section 19 as it was proposed in September 2016.

Your Constituent, Ruth Wald

2221 Sunset Crest Drive Los Angeles, CA 90046

Add a Link

Ruth Wald [email protected]

https7/mail-9Oogle.com/mail/u/1/?ii=28jk=eOc49b7Oe2&vi0w=pr&q=(in%3Ajnbox%2OOR%2Olabel%3A%5EiifT>)%2Ois%3Aunr6a6&name=Unreaclfii»earch=sec... 1/1






k LA GEECS



Peter Juzwiak <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:09 PMTo: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Dear Coundlmembers,

There is new proposed language in the BMO/BHO you will be voting on this Wednesday (TOMORROW) that would allow 12.24F to be used to evade standards in a way not currently allowed, and not as was originally proposed.

It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code... . " the BMO/BHO regulations apply.

This is not okay and makes it seem like the City Council is trying to sneak last minute changes through to give Conditional Use Permit (CUP) institutions special treatment. Exempting conditionally permitted uses from the BHO/BMO would not be a clarification but rather a significant change from the municipal code.

Please stand up for your constituents and make sure the BMO/BHO actually protects Single-Family Zone Hillside Area Development Standards. The City should go back to the original language - strike out section 13 of the current proposal - or go back to the originally proposed section 19 as it was proposed in September 2016.

Sincerely,

Peter Juzwiak and Don DeRose

4109 Shadyglade Avenue


https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=28tik=e0c49b70e2&view-pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20labet%3A%5Eiim}%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec... 1/1








https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=28tik=e0c49b70e2&view-pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20labet%3A%5Eiim%7d%20is%3Aunread&name=Unread&search=sec

3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail - BMO/BHO - STRIKE OUT PHRASE OF SECTION 13 NEEDED


BMO/BHO - STRIKE OUT PHRASE OF SECTION 13 NEEDED1 message

Sabrina Parke <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:02 PMBcc: [email protected]

Dear Councilmember,



This is not okay and makes it seem tike City Council is trying to sneak last minute changes through to give Conditional Use Permit (CUP) institutions special treatment. Exempting conditionally permitted uses from the BHO/BMO would not be a clarification but rather a significant change from the municipal code.


Your Constituent,Sabrina Parke Toluca Lake, CA 91602

https://maii.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=:Unreaci&search=sec... 1/1




https://maii.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&name=:Unreaci&search=sec




Babbie Green <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:21 PMTo: [email protected]

Dear Council Member Dickinson:


It now says: "Except as allowed by Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code. . . , " the BMO/BHO regulations apply.



Your Constituent,Babbie Green 4548 Sunnyslope Ave.Sherman Oaks, CA. 91423

Sent from my iPhone

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=;e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim}%20is%3Aunread&name-Unread&s6arch=s®c... 1/1




https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=;e0c49b70e2&view=pt&q=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim%7d%20is%3Aunread&name-Unread&s6arch=s%c2%aec


^GEECS Sharon Dickinson <[email protected]>


Joseph Bishara <[email protected]> Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:19 PMTo: [email protected]

Dear Councilmember,




It now says: '*Except as allowed bv Section 12.24 F and 14.00 A of this Code.. . . " theBMO/BHO regulations apply.





Your Constituent,

Joseph Bishara Kebbe3454 Coldwater Canyon Ave. Studio City, CA 91604

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2S<view=pt8tq=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&narTie=Unread&search=sec... 1/1




https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/?ui=2&ik=e0c49b70e2S%3cview=pt8tq=(in%3Ainbox%20OR%20label%3A%5Eiim)%20is%3Aunread&narTie=Unread&search=sec

Support of BMO for Cheviot Hills CF 14-0656,16-460,16-470 · 3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail -...

Documents

Transcript of Support of BMO for Cheviot Hills CF 14-0656,16-460,16-470 · 3/1/2017 City of Los Angeles Mail -...