Supervisor: Eike Middell

17
Kate Husband Cambridge University, UK Development of an Online Filter for Selection of Cascade-like Events in IceCube Supervisor: Eike Middell

description

Kate Husband Cambridge University, UK Development of an Online Filter for Selection of Cascade-like Events in IceCube. Supervisor: Eike Middell. Signals. IceCube looks for high-energy astrophysical n E.g. from supernova remnants Also detects atmospheric n ’s - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Supervisor: Eike Middell

Page 1: Supervisor: Eike Middell

Kate HusbandCambridge University, UK

Development of an Online Filter for Selection of Cascade-like Events in IceCube

Supervisor: Eike Middell

Page 2: Supervisor: Eike Middell

Signals

• IceCube looks for high-energy astrophysical • E.g. from supernova remnants• Also detects atmospheric ’s

• Primary cosmic rays produce muons which is the main background to IceCube.

Page 3: Supervisor: Eike Middell

IceCube

• 1km3 high energy, telescope at S Pole

• Contains DOMs with PMT which record amp. & time of photons

• Ice contains dust particles and air bubbles so photons scatter

Page 4: Supervisor: Eike Middell

Events: Cascade-like

• interact through weak force only

• Quarks produce cascade of Cherenkov photons

• Photon intensity decays rapidly

• Muons can also knock out e- resulting in em cascade

Page 5: Supervisor: Eike Middell

Events: Track-like

• Muons move close to c • Don’t lose much energy

in producing Cherenkov light

• Only arrive from above detector as decay quickly

• Hence long straight downwards tracks

Page 6: Supervisor: Eike Middell

Multi- Vs. Single-Peak

• If triggered, DOM records continuous waveform

1. Try and fit pulses of different times and amp. into waveform = MULTI-PEAK (mp)

OR

2. Find no. of photons from total amplitude and give all photons the same time = SINGLE-PEAK (sp)

Page 7: Supervisor: Eike Middell

AIMs

• Online filter must separate multiple background events from signal within constraints.

• Constraints: limited bandwidth & CPU power

• Aim to improve efficiency by looking at possible new single-peak cut variables

Page 8: Supervisor: Eike Middell

A. ToI• Each DOM is given a

mass proportional to amount of charge it records

• Centre of gravity of distribution is used as approx. to interaction vertex

• Good cut variable as spherical ~0.3, tracks ~0.

Page 9: Supervisor: Eike Middell

B. LineFit Velocity

• Fits a straight line through triggered DOMs

• Var(time) is not a good cut variable

Page 10: Supervisor: Eike Middell

• Charge weighting doesn’t increase separation

Page 11: Supervisor: Eike Middell

C: Cumulative Charge

• Cumulative sum of charge of each DOM over time

• Take time at x% of total charge to get tx

• Single-peak

Page 12: Supervisor: Eike Middell

• ~t75 found to give largest separation

Page 13: Supervisor: Eike Middell

D: Charge Propagation

• Decay of charge-energy ratio different

• Total charge ≈energy and centre of gravity ≈ interaction vertex

• Single-peak

Page 14: Supervisor: Eike Middell

• Mean on new axis for each event weighted with distance is new variable: MCD

Page 15: Supervisor: Eike Middell

Optimization

• New filter: MCD+ToI (sp): 73% e

• Previous filter: vel+ToI (mp): 71.7% e (smaller detector)

Page 16: Supervisor: Eike Middell

Energy Efficiency

• New filter is slightly better at low energies

• Blue: vel +ToI (mp), Red: MCD+ToI (sp)

Page 17: Supervisor: Eike Middell

Summary

• LineFit velocity cannot be replaced by variance of time

• New single-peak cut variables: t75 and MCD

• New filter suggested with MCD>61.4, ToI>0.14 passing 73.0% sig. for 1% bkd.

• New filter has slightly better low energy efficiency.