Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April...
Transcript of Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April...
![Page 1: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Supervising Doctoral Students’ WritingBI Oslo, April 2016
Professor Rowena MurrayUniversity of the West of [email protected]
![Page 2: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Introduction
1. A framework of approaches to supervising students’ writing (Lee & Murray, 2015).
2. Exemplars of writing activities and supervisor feedback.
3. Areas for supervisors to explore.
![Page 7: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
5 inter-dependent, non-linear approaches to supervision (Lee, 2008)
Functional: Supervisors manage students’ projects. Enculturation: Supervisors enable students to become
members of the disciplinary community. Critical thinking: Supervisors enable students to question
and analyse their work. Emancipation: Supervisors enable students to question
and develop themselves. Relationship development: Supervisors enthuse, inspire
and care for students.
![Page 8: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Framework for supervisor’s activities & knowledge
Functional: rational progression through tasks, directing, project management.
Enculturation: gatekeeping, introducing exemplars of high quality work, diagnosing deficiencies.
Critical thinking: evaluation, challenge, argument, analysis, synthesis.
Emancipation: mentoring and supporting constructivism, reframing.
Relationship development: emotional intelligence, managing conflict, developing research team.
![Page 9: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Applying the framework to writingFunctional
Goal-setting and monitoring Theory and practice of academic writing Design experiences, tasks & events Range of skills & strategies Understand stages in academic writing Attend academic writing workshop
![Page 10: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Exemplar writing tasks
Create writing plan Define long, medium & short term goals Report on progress Generic structures Outlining Deadlines
![Page 11: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Define ‘writing’
Getting something down on paper/screen Sketching an idea for a chapter/paper Drafting a chapter/paper Outlining a chapter/paper Revising a draft chapter/paper Talking about writing Getting/processing feedback on writing Just getting started
![Page 12: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Setting writing goals
Define audience – what are their expectations? Define purpose of the writing task. Choose a verb to define purpose. Define scale and scope of the writing. Decide number of words to write. Decide how long you take to do this. Create sub-tasks for this task. Use numbers to make sub-goals specific.
![Page 13: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Non-specific writing goals
• Start doing 5 minutes’ writing practice daily.Too big a change. Purpose of writing task and text not defined.
• Write/revise the introduction.No scale and scope. Writing task not defined.
• Get more feedback on writing.Type of feedback needed not defined. Recipe for misunderstanding and/or frustration and delay.
![Page 14: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Specific writing goals
Do 5 minutes’ freewriting today at 9.45am. Define the chapter topic in 500 words. For 60 minutes do a
rough draft between 11am and 12. Verb: e.g. Summarise … Supervisor-student discussion: is this chapter focused? Is
the main point clear? Does it fit with the rest of the thesis? Agree date for feedback and level of detail for feedback: e.g. brief comment, detailed explanation or what?
Define ‘level’ of quality appropriate for this writing task.
![Page 15: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
‘Snack writing’
Writing for shorter periods: 90 minutes. Using a writing warm-up to get started. Setting a specific writing goal for each writing
slot. Monitoring the extent to which that writing goal
was achieved. Re-setting writing goals. Defining new writing goal [verb] at the end of
each writing session.
![Page 16: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Generic outline
3 levels of outlining Align outline with abstract Align outline with the target journal Get peer & supervisor feedback on outline Write the outline as series of prompts Make these into writing goals & sub-goals
![Page 18: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Feedback on functional writing tasks Achievement of agreed goals Monitoring goals over period of time Using features of academic writing Ongoing skills development Understanding stages in academic writing Integrating knowledge from writing
workshop
![Page 19: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Applying the framework to writingEnculturation
Feedback & assessment Creating dialogue & groupings Exploring discourses & practices Diagnosing strengths & weaknesses Deciding which scholars & debates to
highlight
![Page 20: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Exemplar writing tasks
Revising Report on acting on feedback Structured discussion of writing-in-progress
with other researchers Explicit framework for feedback Peer feedback
![Page 21: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
‘Writing’ – it’s not just about text
Using the criteria for the doctorate and publication. Managing a high-stakes, long-term writing project. Writing clarity, coherence and confidence. Developing productive writing behaviours. Developing self-efficacy and resilience for writing. Developing effective revision strategies. Knowledge of different writing strategies. Learning through writing. Constructing new knowledge in writing. Developing a repertoire of writing strategies.
![Page 22: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Assessment criteriaExaminers’ report form(i) The thesis makes a distinct contribution to knowledge.(ii) The candidate possesses a good general knowledge of
the field.(iii) The thesis is a record of original research.(iv) The literary style and presentation of the thesis are
satisfactory.(v) The thesis is in part/in whole worthy of publication.(vi) The oral examination was satisfactory.
![Page 23: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Writing prompts to make a thesis‘contribution’ explicit
• This research shows/reveals/confirms …
• This is a contribution in the sense that …
• This is a contribution to the extent that …
• Define order and proportion of your research to other research -- in relation to specific researchers’ work.
• Define similarities and/or differences between your work and theirs.
![Page 24: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Assessment: using the concept of levels of quality to plan, monitor and evaluate writing
Content Coherence or continuity Clarity Structure Grammar and language Depth Meeting the deadline Originality (and other academic criteria) Aligned with rationale provided in the text
![Page 25: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Creating dialogue and groupings
Writer’s group: can be inter-disciplinary, twice a month for 90 minutes, someone as timekeeper, define 90-minute goal, monitor extent to which goal achieved, micro-groups of 2 or 3 people.
Writing retreat: off-campus, residential, all working in same room, non-surveillance, without email/internet, with peer discussions of work-in-progress, 2 days, 10½ hours.
![Page 26: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Social writing
![Page 27: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Structured writing retreat
Fixed programme Regular discussions Talking about writing-
in-progress Developing peer
relations round writing Writing experiences See rowenamurray.org
![Page 28: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Fixed programme - 10½ hours of writing
Day 1 (1 hour)5.30-6.30
Day 2 (5½ hours)9.30-1111.30-12.302-3.304-5.30
Day 3 (4 hours)9.30-1111.30-12.302-3.30
![Page 29: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Supervisors can enable structure @ writing retreats‘The structured, focused nature means youcan’t just bow out’.‘I achieved more in that one weekend than Ihad for the months prior to that’.The facilitator ‘kept order’ and ‘ensured you remained focused’.‘We would not have achieved the outputswithout the facilitator’.
![Page 30: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Writing retreat outputs
1. Revised paper for submission to journal + wrote 5,000 words of book chapter
2. Completed conference paper and journal article + half of second chapter of thesis
3. Revised article (following reviewers’ comments) + completed 80% of dissertation by pulling documents together
4. Drafted book chapter, received feedback from group and revised + wrote 2 conference posters + results section of a journal article
5. Completed journal article + 1st draft of another paper + conference poster + 80% of another poster + outline for next journal article + 750-word assignment
6. Wrote first draft of methodology chapter of thesis (10,000 words)See rowenamurray.org where students talk about retreat experiences.
![Page 31: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Supervisor- and student-led groups
![Page 32: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Exploring discoursesAnalysing published writing
‘ … there have been a number of attempts to address … Considerable effort has been devoted to estimating … However, none of these approaches attempted to assess the impact of …’.
(Young et al, 2002)
![Page 33: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Analysing published writing
‘Physical activity in childhood and adolescence has shown significant declines in recent decades…. By understanding … child and youth care workers may be better able to diagnose individual needs … A theoretical model is offered in support of these objectives’.
(Gavin & Lister, 2001: 325)
![Page 34: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Analysing published writing
‘This is both a review of the professional literature in the area of professional holding as well as an attempt to place the issue in a practical and reasonable context’.
(Ziegler, 2001: 33)
![Page 35: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Analysing types of contribution
• ‘The future development of these, and other, areas of writing on academic careers, is considered’(Blaxter et al, 1998).
• ‘… suggests an alternative to traditional … programs …’ (Boice, 1987).
• ‘These findings suggest that short writing courses can be of benefit … but that such courses should focus directly on … (Torrance et al, 1993).
![Page 36: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Matching defined research gap and an article’s contribution
‘Recent research has been concerned with whether speech accommodation is an automatic process or determined by social factors … This paper investigates … These biases are, crucially, simultaneously automatic and social’ (Babel, Language in Society, 2010).
![Page 37: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Feedback on enculturation writing tasks Agreed revisions Articulating revision actions Understanding of writing-in-progress Relating writing to criteria Relating writing to components of quality Experience of peer feedback Assessing writing development needs
![Page 38: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Supervisor feedback examples
Discuss and define ‘precision’ in writing. Review examples of relative levels of precision in
student’s writing. Some of your assertions of contribution go beyond
the evidence you provided. Introductions to chapters and sections do not yet
say what they will do. Let’s list ways to make your writing more precise
in the next revision.
![Page 39: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Applying the framework to writingCritical thinking
Introducing rhetorical strategies & writing practices
Discussing criteria for doctoral writing & publication
Encouraging conceptual mapping Constructing & deconstructing arguments,
identifying gaps [Includes critical thinking about writing]
![Page 40: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Exemplar writing tasks
Define needs of academic audiences Highlight rhetorical moves in own writing Use range of writing strategies Draw concept maps Analyse and discuss published writing and
completed theses Summarise thesis argument at different stages in
the research
![Page 41: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Highlighting rhetorical moves
Description Narration Process Comparison &
contrast Analysis Classification Definition
Categorical proposition
Evaluation Causal analysis Refutation Proposal
(See Murray 2014)
![Page 42: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Active verbs for discussing ideas
Informs, reviews, argues, states, claims, synthesises, answers, explains, reconsiders, provides, maintains, outlines, supports, compares, lists, acknowledges, confirms, analyses, disputes, concludes, reveals, implies, reminds, suggests, considers, highlights, refutes, assembles, shows, adds, clarifies, identifies (Ballenger, 2014)
![Page 43: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Using a range of writing practices
‘Snack writing’ Writing to prompts Freewriting Generative writing Social writing Planning and outlining Defining audience expectations/criteria Developing productive writing behaviors Rhetorical strategies (and rhetorical analysis) Goal-setting and monitoring for academic writing
![Page 44: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Constructing academic arguments:Writing a ‘page-98 paper’(Page 98 of 1st edition of How to Write a Thesis)
My research question is … (50 words) Researchers who have looked at this subject are
… (50 words) They argue that … (25 words) Debate centres on the issue of … (25 words) There is work to be done on … (25 words) My research is closest to that of X in that … (50
words) My contribution will be … (50 words)
![Page 45: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Why write a ‘page 98 paper’? And when?
Early: to establish direction/focus Link to and distinguish from the literature Build on research question/hypothesis Focus reading/thinking Manageable writing task: 275 words To develop thinking and/or for thesis? Late: to focus thinking/intro conclusions
![Page 46: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Constructing arguments for publications: Brown’s 8 questions(Brown 1994/95 )
1. Who are intended readers? (3-5 names)2. What did you do? (50 words)3. Why did you do it? (50 words)4. What happened? (50 words)5. What do results mean in theory? (50 words)6. What do results mean in practice? (50 words)7. What is the key benefit for readers (25 words)8. What remains unresolved? (no word limit)
![Page 47: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Purposes of Brown’s 8 questions
To draft an abstract Not just for experimental work Set word limits Using generic structure Generating text to work on later Write abstract first, not last Construct/see the whole argument
![Page 48: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Summary of thesisOr synthesis of body of work
750 words, 3 pages, double-spaced. Use verbs to define purposes of chapters:
Chapter 1 [verb] … Chapter 2 [verb] …. Shows coherence of the whole argument. Makes links between chapters and papers. Makes links between aim(s) and claim(s). Insert at end of thesis/report Introduction.
![Page 49: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Feedback on critical thinking writing tasks Definitions of audience needs: conferences,
examiners, journals Rhetorical moves: choice, use, proportions Writing strategies used Analysis of published writing Thesis summary completed Revisions: e.g. generic to specific?
![Page 50: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Examples of supervisor feedback
Use the same words in your abstract, summary and chapter introductions.
Link your study’s achievements explicitly to your study’s aims.
How productive do you feel your writing is at this stage?
Your goals for your next revision should be to …
![Page 51: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Feedback on draft thesis summary
Some of these paragraphs are longer than others –why is that?
You defined generic contents of some chapters, e.g. ‘the literature is reviewed’ – specify the literature you reviewed and why, and not, and why not.
Match aims (at start) and claims (at end). To what extent did you achieve your writing goal
in the time we allocated?
![Page 52: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Applying the framework to writingEmancipation
Encouraging students to read widely and engage with interdisciplinary issues
Anticipating problems with writing Using motivational approaches Keeping the destination open Encouraging self-monitoring
![Page 53: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Exemplar writing tasks
Freewriting Generative writing Writing to prompts Creating prompts for their writing Students and supervisor discuss and agree
length and scope of writing tasks
![Page 54: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Freewriting
Write for 5 minutes In sentences Without stopping Private writing – no one will read it What to write about? The subject of your next chapter
or paper, your target journal or its requirements Brainstorm in sentences Structure and coherence not required Explore many angles, do ‘open’ writing
![Page 55: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Generative writing
Same routine as freewriting But more focused, more ‘closed’ Write about the verbs for your chapter/paper
and/or for sections of your chapter/paper Or use your freewriting as your focus To be read by one person in the group
![Page 56: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Freewriting & generative for thesis writing and publications To get started To explore possibilities To silence the ‘internal editor’ temporarily To develop confidence To develop fluency To work out a complex argument To do rough drafting Freewriting to work out what you want to say; generative
writing to work out how to say it.
![Page 57: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Pros & cons
‘Freewheelers’ like it; ‘structurers’ don’t. It’s useful to use both types of strategy. Try it for a period of time to see whether
there is benefit for your writing process. It may be important to ‘write about your
writing’ for some of the time.
![Page 58: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
References
FreewritingElbow, P. (1998) Writing without teachers, 2nd
edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Generative writingBoice, R. (1990) Professors as writers: A self-help
guide to productive writing. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
![Page 59: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
The warm up prompt
What writing for your thesis/writing for publication have you done, and what would you like to do [in the long, medium and short term]?
5 minutes’ writing In sentences Private writing – no one will read it To be discussed in pairs/groups
![Page 60: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Prompts to match research aim(s) and claim(s)
The aims of this study were …
The research questions were …
The research objectives are were …
This study showed …
![Page 61: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Using prompts to generate text
Warm up prompts, e.g. 5 minutes taking stock and goal-setting.
Generic prompts, e.g. ‘The purpose of this paper is to … This suggests that …’
Journal prompts, e.g. …? [in your target journal] Questions, e.g. ‘What do I want to write?’ In outlines, i.e. as well as headings. Revision prompts, e.g. ‘Define other approaches’.
![Page 62: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Self-monitoring
‘I think now what I would do is, I would put aside time every week, and then I would try and use the structure to work on bits of it, so that you are working your way through it, snacking on it…. Just write freely and then review it after’.
‘The sort of breaking it down to plan in order that the snacking then became useful because you were actually doing a piece’.
![Page 63: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Self-monitoring
‘The things that stick in my mind are this idea of snacking. You don’t have to sit for 48 hours writing something up. Do it in half-an-hour and plan the time. Commit yourself to a timetable … that very simple technique of breaking it right down was useful’.
![Page 64: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Using verbs as promptsto show purposes of chapters and sections
This chapter analyses … explores … questions … challenges …
It argues that … It illustrates … The findings suggest … This paper concludes by suggesting …• It begins with … then … and finally …
![Page 65: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Self-monitoring task
WRITTENList writing done so far. Include all draft chapters/papers. Add up the number of words/pages written. List papers/chapters written partly or in full.
• TO WRITEList chapters/parts of chapter/papers still to write.
![Page 66: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Feedback on emancipation writing tasks Evidence of reading Inclusion of interdisciplinary issues Identifying writing problems Problem solving Self-motivation Route map to destination Self-monitoring Combining different writing strategies
![Page 67: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Combining different strategies
Use both structuring and ‘freewheeling’. Recognise your/student’s preferences. Use different strategies for different
purposes – define purpose. Look for a detailed outline (with prompts)
to plan increments for writing. Discuss links and disconnects between
feedback and defined writing tasks.
![Page 68: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Applying the framework to writingRelationship development
Discussing writing processes Describing own and others’ writing practices Co-authoring Simultaneous writing Rhetorical intelligence Managing conflict about purpose & nature of
writing tasks
![Page 69: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Exemplar writing tasks
Discussing, sharing and comparing writing practices with other researchers
Evaluating others’ research Discussing writing goals and achievements Face-to-face feedback Comparing own critiques of research with others’ Using this framework to assess progress and
define development needs
![Page 70: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Defining 3 types of purpose for writing
1. The purpose of the textThe purpose of this chapter is to …
2. The purpose of the researchThe purpose of the research was to …
3. The purpose of each writing task – decide what the writing will do (e.g. will it develop an idea, document a step in the research, argue for an interpretation, refute others, construct a contribution argument etc.?)
![Page 71: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Defining writing for/with doctoral students
Define scale and scope of writing project, chapter, section, paper, report etc.
Choose mode and structure of text. Allocate deadline, writing time and words
to be written - in numbers. Set writing goals and review/re-set them
![Page 72: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Feedback on relationship development writing tasks Regular attendance at writing group Attending writing retreat Rehearsing conference presentation at research
group Engaging in face-to-face or email discussion with
other researchers Discussing different ways to use this framework
![Page 73: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Summary: Defining feedback
Appropriate to the task as set. Encouraging self-assessment, in relation to task. Applying academic criteria (and ‘quality’). Asking questions (Lee & Murray 2015: 566). Prompting peer review. Linking to overall structure of project and
thesis/paper. Directing towards next task/revision.
![Page 74: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
The demands of writing
‘[Writing] requires me to bring all my attention and energy to bear on the tasks that it involves (thinking, formulating, experimenting, drafting, reflecting, reading, synthesising, generating ideas, pulling together a lot of information, drawing out key themes, articulating complex ideas, adopting positions, generating explanations, reaching conclusions etc.)’.
![Page 75: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Supervisors can explore furtherFor example
Freewriting: are students using it, when, how, to develop their ideas, to focus on their ideas away from others’, early in the doctorate to find ideas or later to begin thinking about contribution?
3-Minute Thesis International, a UWS initiative to internationalise the doctoral experience, create research links and open up potentially generative dialogue and stimulate collaboration.
![Page 76: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Conclusion
A range of writing strategies for many demands of academic writing. As different as freewriting and structured writing, ‘snack’ and ‘binge’,
solitary and social. Also being able to define sub-routines of academic writing. And supervisors can explore where these strategies and sub-routines fit
in the doctoral writing process.
![Page 77: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
References
Aitchison, C. and Guerin, C. (Eds.) (2014) Writing Groups for Doctoral Education and Beyond: Innovations in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Ballenger, B. (2014) The Curious Researcher: A Guide to Writing Research Papers, 8th edition. New York: Pearson Longman.
Brown, R. (1994/95) Write right first time, Literati Newsline: 1-8.
Carter, S. and Laurs, D. (Eds.) (2017) Giving Feedback on Research Writing: A Handbook for Supervisors and Advisors. London: Routledge.
![Page 78: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
References
Clughen, L. and Hardy, C. (Eds.) (2012) Writing in the Disciplines: Building Supportive Cultures for Student Writing. Bingley: Emerald.
Lee, A. (2008) How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral supervision, Studies in Higher Education, 33: 267-281.
Lee, A. and Murray, R. (2015) Supervising writing: helping postgraduate students develop as researchers, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(5): 558-570.
Murray, R. (2013) Writing for Academic Journals, 3rd edition. Maidenhead: Open University Press-McGraw-Hill.
![Page 79: Supervising Doctoral Students’ Writing BI Oslo, April 2016norsi.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/R-Murray-Supervisor-Seminar-B… · BI Oslo, April 2016 Professor Rowena Murray University](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022043003/5f83ad2846f3781ac135bda9/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
References
Murray, R. (2014) ‘Snack’ and ‘binge’ writing, Journal of Academic Development and Education, 2: 5-8.
Murray, R. (2015) Writing in Social Spaces: A Social Practices Approach to Academic Writing. London: Routledge-Society for Research into Higher Education.
Murray, R. (2016) How to Write a Thesis, 4th edition. Maidenhead: Open University Press-McGraw-Hill.
Thow, M. (2015) How to be Healthy at Work: For People doing PhDs and Other Higher Degrees, Academics, Teachers and Office Workers who Sit a Lot. Amazon: Ebook.