Superviser: A/Prof. Bas Heijman Promotor: Prof. Luuk Rietveld

9
10-01-2014 Challenge the future Delft University of Technology Superviser: A/Prof. Bas Heijman Promotor: Prof. Luuk Rietveld Ran Shang Application of Tight Ceramic Ultrafiltration (TCUF) and Ceramic Nanofiltration (CNF) for water reuse

description

Application of Tight Ceramic Ultrafiltration (TCUF) and Ceramic Nanofiltration (CNF) for water reuse. Ran Shang . Superviser: A/Prof. Bas Heijman Promotor: Prof. Luuk Rietveld. Ceramic membranes. Ceramic membranes. Defect in a ceramic membrane. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Superviser: A/Prof. Bas Heijman Promotor: Prof. Luuk Rietveld

Page 1: Superviser:   A/Prof. Bas Heijman Promotor:     Prof. Luuk Rietveld

10-01-2014 Challenge the future

DelftUniversity ofTechnology

Superviser: A/Prof. Bas Heijman

Promotor: Prof. Luuk Rietveld

Ran Shang

Application of Tight Ceramic Ultrafiltration (TCUF) and Ceramic Nanofiltration (CNF)

for water reuse

Page 2: Superviser:   A/Prof. Bas Heijman Promotor:     Prof. Luuk Rietveld

2

Ceramic membranes

Page 3: Superviser:   A/Prof. Bas Heijman Promotor:     Prof. Luuk Rietveld

3

Ceramic membranes

- Homogeneously distributed membrane pores- Long service life- High chemical and thermo- stability Excellence

- High cost (5~10 times) - Fragile Drawback

Defect in a ceramic membrane

Page 4: Superviser:   A/Prof. Bas Heijman Promotor:     Prof. Luuk Rietveld

4

Tight Ceramic UF (CTUF) & Ceramic NF (CNF)

Polymeric membranesCeramic membranes

Relative size of common materials

Page 5: Superviser:   A/Prof. Bas Heijman Promotor:     Prof. Luuk Rietveld

5

Multivalent anion rejection using negatively charged CTUF or CNF

A membrane pore with negative surface

charge

Electrostatic repulsionDouble layer

overlap

Cations >> anions

Take-home message:• 40%~87% of Ortho-P rejection by a 3 kDa TCUF, dependent on

operational conditions (flux, cross-flow velocity, pH).• Higher solution pH leads to higher rejection, due to enhanced

negative surface charge.(Shang et al. Wat. Res. V. 48 P. 498-507)

Page 6: Superviser:   A/Prof. Bas Heijman Promotor:     Prof. Luuk Rietveld

6

Secondary effluent water filtration using 3kDa TCUF

  Rejections, %

Organic matter 45±3 in DOC 61±2 in UV254

Phosphate 62±7

Sulphate 16±1Nitrate 1.0±0.5

Conductivity 4.1±0.1Take-home message:• Phosphate has negative charge and low diffusion: thus easy

removal.• Membrane fouling by effluent organic matter can enhance

phosphate rejection.• About 50% or higher organic removal.

Page 7: Superviser:   A/Prof. Bas Heijman Promotor:     Prof. Luuk Rietveld

7

Implication(1) for effluent water reuse

PS

Municipal wastewater

AS SS

MMF UF RO Demiwaterfor reuse

Digester

Biofouling in RO

Coag. TCUF/CNF

RO Demiwaterfor reuse

>95% P removal~40% OC removal ~60% P removal

~50% OC removal~0,3 µg P L-1

~3 mg L-1 TOC

P limitation!!Low organic carbon!!

Poor removal of OC, P

Biofouling

Page 8: Superviser:   A/Prof. Bas Heijman Promotor:     Prof. Luuk Rietveld

8

Implication(2) for sewer mining

PS

Municipal wastewater

AS SS

MMF UF RO Demiwaterfor reuse

Digester

CNF RO Demiwaterfor reuse

Digester

Energy

Energy

Energy

Struvite

P limitationAnaerobic RO

Biofouling???

Municipal wastewater

PS

Efficiency in concentrating OC and P ???

Page 9: Superviser:   A/Prof. Bas Heijman Promotor:     Prof. Luuk Rietveld

9

Thank you for your attention!