Superficial Atypical Melanocytic Proliferations...Differential diagnosis could include severe dermal...
Transcript of Superficial Atypical Melanocytic Proliferations...Differential diagnosis could include severe dermal...
5/21/2018
1
Disclosures
Consulting:Myriad Genetics
SciBase
Superficial Atypical Melanocytic Proliferations
SSM, LMM and (some of) their Simulants
5/21/2018
2
Melanomas and Nevi.
• Nevi are important mainly in relation to melanoma– Precursors – but risk for individual lesions is low
– Risk markers – important mainly in high risk situations
– Simulants – important in everyday clinical decision-making
• Makes sense to consider attributes of melanomas before discussing nevi
Low UV
Pathway I
Low-CSD MelanomaSupertpficial Spreading Melanoma
Banal Acquired Nevus (junctional, compound, dermal)
Low Grade Dysplasia Bap-1
Deficiency Melanocytoma
Deep penetrating
nevus (DPN)/ Melanocytoma
PigmentedEpithelioid
Melanocytoma (PEM)High Grade
Dysplasia
Superficial Spreading Melanoma
Melanoma in BPDM (rare)
Melanoma in DPN (rare)
Melanoma in PEM (rare)
BRAF V600E, NRAS
(BRAF or NRAS)+BAP1
(BRAF, MEK1, or NRAS) +(CBNN1 or APC)
(BRAF+PRKAR1A) or PRKCA
TERT, CDKN2A, TP53, PTEN
Lentiginous junctional nevus
Compound dysplastic nevus
Superficial spreading or “pagetoid” melanoma
5/21/2018
3
Criteria for Melanoma vs. NeviFeature Melanoma Dysplastic Nevus Nevus
Size larger intermediate smaller
Symmetry poor good good
Rete ridges irregular uniformly elongated uniform
Junctional Melanocytes epithelioid mixed nevoid
Poor circumscription common less common uncommon
Nested variable predominant predominant
Nests coalescent (confluent) bridging discrete
Size of Nests variable uniform uniform
Lentiginous continuous discontinuous discontinuous
Pagetoid high, extensive low, focal, minimal minimal
Nuclear atypia uniform, moderate- random, mild- minimal
severe (size > 1.5x) moderate (1-1.5x) (1x)
Mitoses - junctional about 1/3 of cases almost always absent absent
Pyknosis/necrosis common uncommon uncommon
Fibroplasia diffuse concentric minimal
Lymphocytes bandlike, lichenoid patchy, perivascular minimal
Regression frequent, extensive rare, minimal absent
Dermal Cells uniform atypia random atypia no atypia
limited maturation maturation maturation
mitoses no mitoses no mitoses
Superficial Melanoma and Mimics in Low CSD Skin
• Superficial Spreading (“Pagetoid”) Melanoma
• Junctional and superficial Compound nevi
• Dysplastic Nevi
• Recurrent and Traumatized Nevi
• Pagetoid Spitz and other pagetoid proliferatons
• Superficial Atypical Melanocytic Proliferations (SAMPUS)
5/21/2018
4
Case 1.
DEE-10253
History: M50, Lesion of BackReason for Consultation: Is this a melanoma or a severely dysplastic nevus?
• Broad, moderately to highly cellular, asymmetric.
• Cells at periphery of lesion- predominantly in nests- predominantly near the DEJ - some nests bridging between adjacent elongated rete ridges
• Pattern of melanocytic dysplasia, with severe cytologic atypia and moderate architectural disorder.
5/21/2018
5
• Adjacent component more highly cellular.
• More severe uniform atypia
• Pagetoid scatter• Diffuse fibroplasia• Bandlike
lymphocytic infiltrate
• Few clusters of immature cells in dermis
• Adjacent component more highly cellular.
• More severe uniform atypia
• Pagetoid scatter• Diffuse fibroplasia• Bandlike lymphocytic
infiltrate• Few clusters of
immature cells in dermis
• Localized clusters of mature nevoid cells (precursor/associated nevus)
Your Diagnosis?
Melanoma?
Nevus?
5/21/2018
6
Criteria for Melanoma vs. NeviFeature Melanoma Dysplastic Nevus Nevus
Size larger intermediate smaller
Symmetry poor good good
Rete ridges irregular uniformly elongated uniform
Junctional Melanocytes epithelioid mixed nevoid
Poor circumscription common less common uncommon
Distribution of Nests variable, irregular predominant predominant, regular
Pattern of Nests coalescent (confluent) bridging discrete
Size of Nests variable uniform uniform
Lentiginous (single cells) continuous discontinuous discontinuous
Pagetoid high, extensive low, focal, minimal minimal
Nuclear atypia uniform atypia, random atypia, minimal
severe (>1.5x) mild-moderate
Mitoses - junctional about 1/3 of cases almost always absent absent
Pyknosis/necrosis common uncommon uncommon
Fibroplasia diffuse concentric minimal
Lymphocytes bandlike, lichenoid patchy, perivascular minimal
Regression frequent, extensive rare, minimal absent
Dermal Cells uniform atypia random atypia no atypia
limited maturation maturation maturation
mitoses no mitoses no mitoses
Diagnosis, Case 1, M50.
• Malignant melanoma, superficial spreading type, nonulcerated, non-tumorigenic and nonmitogenic invasive radial growth phase only, Clark level II, greatest Breslow thickness 0.28 mm, see comment.
Comment– Dermal mitotic rate is zero, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are absent (with
moderate noninfiltrating lymphocytes), there is no radial growth phase regression, there is no ulcer, there are no microscopic satellites, and there is no evidence of vascular, lymphatic or neural invasion.
– Age < 56– Associated compound dysplastic nevus. – Appears to be minimally excised. – MPATH-Dx 4. – 100% 5 year survival
Case 2.
Clinical Information.Lesion of left shin with a mottled color in a 26-year-old woman.
Reason for Consultation.I am enclosing for your consultation a melanocytic lesion
present for many years from the right shin of a 27-year-old woman. Though the lesion had not changed (according to the patient), her clinician decided to remove it because he “didn’t
like the mottled color”.
5/21/2018
7
Description.
A relatively broad moderately cellular plaque-like lesion.
Comprised mainly of nested large epithelioid melanocytes with abundant cytoplasm that contains finely divided “dusty” melanin pigment.
Some bridging nests between adjacent rete - possible junctional melanocytic dysplasia of the epithelioid type.
• Nests somewhat haphazardly distributed along the interface
• Poor circumscription
• Patchy to bandlike lymphocytic infiltrate
• Diffuse fibroplasia
• Nests somewhat haphazardly distributed along the interface
• Poor circumscription
• Patchy to bandlike lymphocytic infiltrate
• Diffuse fibroplasia
5/21/2018
8
• Nests somewhat haphazardly distributed along the interface
• Tendency to confluence of nests
• Patchy to bandlike lymphocytic infiltrate
• Diffuse fibroplasia
• Nests somewhat haphazardly distributed along the interface
• Nests in dermis not larger than largest in epidermis
• Tendency to confluence of nests
• Focal pagetoid scatter
Your Diagnosis?
Melanoma?
Nevus?
5/21/2018
9
1.1.2.5. Dermal mitotic activity in atypical cells that resemble those in epidermis.
The mitosis on the right could be considered junctional; however there seems to be a wisp of collagen between the nest which is predominantly located in the dermis, and the overlying junctional nest.
Non tumorigenic mitogenic VGP:
Nests in the dermis are smaller than the largest nests in the epidermis.Count dermal mitoses in 1 sq. mm even if not fully occupied by tumor, express rate as a whole number
Criteria for Melanoma vs. NeviFeature Melanoma Dysplastic Nevus Nevus
Size larger intermediate smaller
Symmetry poor good good
Rete ridges irregular uniformly elongated uniform
Junctional Melanocytes epithelioid mixed nevoid
Poor circumscription common less common uncommon
Distribution of Nests variable, irregular predominant, regular predominant, regular
Distribution of Nests coalescent (confluent) bridging discrete
Size of Nests variable uniform uniform
Lentiginous (single cells) continuous discontinuous minimal
Pagetoid high, extensive low, focal, minimal minimal
Nuclear atypia uniform atypia, random atypia, minimal
severe (>1.5x) mild-moderate
Mitoses – junctional/dermal about 1/3 of cases almost always absent absent
Pyknosis/necrosis common uncommon none
Fibroplasia diffuse concentric minimal
Lymphocytes bandlike, lichenoid patchy, perivascular minimal
Regression frequent, extensive rare, minimal absent
Dermal Cells uniform atypia random atypia no atypia
limited maturation maturation maturation
mitoses no mitoses no mitoses
5/21/2018
10
Diagnosis, Case 2 F26
• Skin, right shin: Malignant melanoma, superficial spreading type, nonulcerated, with non-tumorigenic but mitogenic early vertical growth phase, Clark’s level II, greatest Breslow thickness 0.51 mm, see description and comment.
• Comment. Differential diagnosis could include severe dermal and epidermal melanocytic dysplasia, however, dermal (or even epidermal) mitotic activity essentially rules out this diagnosis. The lesion is not a Spitz nevus/tumor because it is not comprised of large spindle and/or epithelioid cells.
• Dermal mitotic rate: 2 per square millimeter• Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes essentially absent in the invasive component, with brisk
noninfiltrating lymphocytes nearby• Focal radial growth phase regression present• No ulcer, no microscopic satellites, and no evidence of vascular, lymphatic, or neural invasion.• Associated junctional dysplastic nevus of the epithelioid subtype• Actinic elastosis in the adjacent dermis is present and mild. • Lesion is completely excised with a closest border of approximately 1 mm.
Superficial Melanoma and Mimics in Low CSD Skin
• Superficial Spreading (“Pagetoid”) Melanoma
• Junctional and superficial Compound nevi
• Dysplastic Nevi
• Recurrent and Traumatized Nevi
• Pagetoid Spitz and other pagetoid proliferations
• Superficial Atypical Melanocytic Proliferations (SAMPUS)
Case 3.
Clinical Information.A macular slightly variegated lesion from the back of a 37-year-old
woman.Reason for Consultation.Is this a dysplastic nevus?
5/21/2018
11
• 25451• Clinical Information.• A 3 mm macular slightly variegated lesion from the back of a 37-year-old
woman.• Reason for Consultation.• Is this a dysplastic nevus?
• Small• Poorly circumscribed• Nest predominate, discrete• Patchy lymphocytes, scant fibroplasia, numerous melanophages (clinically
atypical)
5/21/2018
12
• Slight/absent cytologic atypia
• No mitoses
Your Diagnosis?
Melanoma?
Nevus?
Your Diagnosis?
Dysplastic?
Nondysplastic?
5/21/2018
13
Criteria for Melanoma vs. NeviFeature Melanoma Dysplastic Nevus Nevus
Size larger intermediate smaller
Symmetry poor good good
Rete ridges irregular uniformly elongated uniform
Junctional Melanocytes epithelioid mixed nevoid
Poor circumscription cannot assess less common uncommon
Distribution of Nests variable, irregular predominant, regular predominant, regular
Distribution of Nests coalescent (confluent) bridging discrete
Size of Nests variable uniform uniform
Lentiginous (single cells) continuous discontinuous minimal
Pagetoid high, extensive low, focal, minimal minimal
Nuclear atypia uniform, moderate- random, mild- minimal
severe (size > 1.5x) moderate (1-1.5x) (1x)
Mitoses – junctional/dermal about 1/3 of cases almost always absent absent
Pyknosis/necrosis common uncommon none
Fibroplasia diffuse concentric minimal
Lymphocytes bandlike, lichenoid patchy, perivascular minimal
Regression frequent, extensive rare, minimal absent
Dermal Cells uniform atypia random or no atypia no atypia
limited maturation maturation maturation
mitoses no mitoses no mitoses
Diagnosis, Case 2-1, F37.
• Diagnosis.• Skin, abdomen: • Lentiginous junctional nevus, with mild dysplasia, see description and comment.• OR Lentiginous junctional nevus
• Comment. • Mild dysplasia is not an independent risk factor for melanoma however if this patient should
have other clinically atypical nevi and/or a family or personal history of melanoma, or other melanoma risk factors, consideration of periodic surveillance may be appropriate.
• The lesion appears to be excised however even if this were not the case, reexcision might not be necessary if this biopsy was considered representative of the lesion and especially if the patient were to be followed.
• Since mild dysplasia is not an independent risk factor for melanoma, lesions of this type might be better given a descriptive name such as “lentiginous junctional nevus”.
• It is important to distinguish these lesions from nevoid lentigo maligna, which can also be characterized by slight degrees of cytologic atypia.
• This is an MPATH Category 1 lesion (no need for reexcision even if margins are positive).
Superficial Atypical Nevi.
• Nevi are important mainly in relation to melanoma
– Precursors – but risk for individual lesions is low (one in thousands)
– Risk markers – important mainly in high risk situations (patients with multiple atypical nevi, family history, high CSD etc.)
– Simulants – important in everyday clinical decision-making.
5/21/2018
14
Grading of atypia in nevi: correlation with melanoma risk Arumi-Uria, McNutt, Finnerty, 2003
• Grading of nevi with architectural disorder (dysplastic nevi) involves architectural and cytological features.
• Grades of atypia are related to patient history of melanoma: – personal history of melanoma present in 5.7% of 2,504 patients with mild,
8.1% of 1657 with moderate, and 19.7% of 320 patients with severe atypia.
• Odds ratio as a measure of association between NAD and history of melanoma:– 4.08 for severe versus mild, – 2.81 for severe versus moderate and – 1.45 for moderate versus mild dysplasia.
• “Melanoma risk is greater in persons whose nevi have higher grade histological atypia”
Dysplasia Grading Criteria ……. Arumi-Uria et al, Mod Pathol, 2003
Mild Moderate Severe
• The clinically most atypical macular nevus was biopsied from 80 newly incident cases of melanoma and spouse controls.
• Histological dysplasia was assigned on a subjective 0-4 point scale by a 13-member panel of dermatopathologists (International Melanoma Pathology Group)
• Subjects with panel ratings > 1 had increased relative risk of melanoma:
• Odds ratio after adjustment for confounders = 3.99, 95% CI 1.02-15.71.
• kappa statistic was 0.28 for the panel histological diagnoses, indicating poor interobserver reproducibility.– Repeating study agreed but found size to be a good surrogate/correlate for
atypia– Evidence-based criteria for histologic dysplasia as a risk marker
5/21/2018
15
Xiong, Rabkin, Piepkorn, Barnhill et al, JAAD, 2014
“Given that measuring diameter tends to be more objective than grading dysplasia, these results could provide increased consistency when assessing risk of melanoma among patients with dysplastic nevi”
Rabkin, Piepkorn, Barnhill et al JAAD
Mild Dysplasia
• Poorly reproducible diagnosis (vs. nevus)• Not associated with melanoma risk• Not a high risk precursor• Not a strong simulant of melanoma• UNCERTAINTY vs. Moderate dysplasia, No dysplasia
• Should be considered in the spectrum of banal nevi (junctional or compound nevus, e.g. lentiginous junctional nevus)
• Complete excision is not necessary even when margins are positive
• TERM “MILD DYSPLASIA” SHOULD NO LONGER BE USED
• (Lentiginous) Junctional Nevus
< 4 mm diameter
minimal cytologic atypia
5/21/2018
16
Moderate Dysplasia
• Controversial• Poorly reproducible diagnosis (vs mild, severe)• UNCERTAINTY vs. Mild dysplasia, MIS• Associated with melanoma risk• Probably not a high risk precursor• A weak simulant of melanoma (at least
histologically)
• Complete excision is a consideration; observation is an option
Severe Dysplasia
• Reasonably reproducible diagnosis
• UNCERTAINTY vs. MIS
• Associated with melanoma risk
• Probably a high risk precursor
• A strong simulant of melanoma (at least histologically)
• Should be managed by complete excision and consideration of follow-up, similar to MIS
Proposal for Grading Dysplasia
• Junctional/compound nevus
– Includes former mild dysplasia and “Clark’s nevus”
• Low Grade Dysplasia (LGD)
– Former moderate dysplasia
• High Grade Dysplasia (HGD)
– Former severe dysplasia
5/21/2018
17
Case 4.
Part 2-2. 5475Clinical Information.
Please find enclosed slides on a 36-year-old male with multiple dysplastic nevi removed. Reason for Consultation.
I have also enclosed a prior pathology report of other lesions removed. My diagnosis is compound melanocytic nevus with architectural disorder and moderate cytologic atypia. However,
I am concerned that this lesion may be severely dysplastic. Would you recommend a reexcision procedure?
• Broad• Symmetric• Moderately cellular • Poorly circumscribed
5/21/2018
18
• Broad• Symmetric• Moderately
cellular • Poorly
circumscribed• Slight low
level pagetoid scatter
• Moderate random atypia
• Nuclear size 1-1.5x
Your Diagnosis?
Melanoma?
Nevus?
Your Diagnosis?
Dysplastic?
Nondysplastic?
5/21/2018
19
Your Diagnosis?
Low Grade?
High Grade?
Criteria for Melanoma vs. NeviFeature Melanoma Dysplastic Nevus Nevus
Size larger intermediate smaller
Symmetry poor good good
Rete ridges irregular uniformly elongated uniform
Junctional Melanocytes epithelioid mixed (nevoid to epithelioid) nevoid
Poor circumscription cannot assess less common uncommon
Distribution of Nests variable, irregular predominant, regular predominant, regular
Distribution of Nests coalescent (confluent) bridging discrete
Size of Nests variable uniform uniform
Lentiginous (single cells) continuous discontinuous minimal
Pagetoid high, extensive low, focal, minimal minimal
Nuclear atypia uniform, moderate- random, mild- minimal
severe (size > 1.5x) moderate (1-1.5x) (1x)
Mitoses – junctional/dermal about 1/3 of cases almost always absent absent
Pyknosis/necrosis common uncommon none
Fibroplasia diffuse concentric minimal
Lymphocytes bandlike, lichenoid patchy, perivascular minimal
Regression frequent, extensive rare, minimal absent
Dermal Cells uniform atypia random or no atypia no atypia
limited maturation maturation maturation
mitoses no mitoses no mitoses
Diagnosis (Part 2, Case 3).
Skin, back (M36): Compound nevus with moderate dysplasia, completely excised, see description and comment.
OR Compound dysplastic nevus, low grade
Comment. • Patient presents with multiple lesions, some of which are
dysplastic nevi with moderate dysplasia. • Benign lesions with little or no potential for recurrence and no
potential for metastasis. • Periodic follow-up may be appropriate for this patient,
especially if there are other clinically atypical nevi and/or a family or personal history of melanoma.
• Although the lesion extends close to the specimen margin, there is no essential indication for reexcision, especially if the patient is to be followed.
This is an MPATH DX Category 1 or perhaps Category 2 lesion, depending on clinical correlation and preference.
5/21/2018
20
Case 5.
Part 2-3.Clinical Information:
A lesion from the back of a 54 year old manReason for consultation:
The clinician was concerned about a melanoma but I favor a dysplastic nevus.
Description:
Very broad
Moderately cellular
Reasonably symmetrical
Uniformly elongated rete
Patchy infiltrate in dermis
5/21/2018
21
5/21/2018
22
• Description:• Very broad Moderate pagetoid scatter, low
level• Moderately cellular Mild to moderate cytologic atypia• Reasonably symmetrical Mild to moderate solar elastosis• Uniformly elongated rete• Patchy infiltrate in dermis
Your Diagnosis?
Melanoma?
Nevus?
Your Diagnosis?
Dysplastic?
Nondysplastic?
5/21/2018
23
Your Diagnosis?
Low Grade?
High Grade?
Compound nevus with severe dysplasia(Severe architectural disorder, moderate cytological atypia)
Feature Melanoma Dysplastic Nevus Nevus
Size larger intermediate smaller
Cellularity high intermediate lower
Symmetry poor good good
Rete ridges irregular uniformly elongated uniform
Junctional Melanocytes epithelioid mixed (nevoid to epithelioid) nevoid
Poor circumscription common less common uncommon
Nested variable predominant predominant
Nests coalescent (confluent) bridging discrete
Size of Nests variable uniform uniform
Lentiginous continuous discontinuous discontinuous
Pagetoid high, extensive low, focal, minimal minimal
Nuclear atypia uniform atypia, random atypia, minimal,
moderate-severe mild-moderate (1-1.5X) mild
Mitoses - junctional about 1/3 of cases almost always absent absent
Pyknosis/necrosis common uncommon uncommon
Fibroplasia diffuse concentric minimal
Lymphocytes bandlike, lichenoid patchy, perivascular minimal
Regression frequent, extensive rare, minimal absent
Dermal Cells Absent uniform atypia random or no atypia no atypia
limited maturation maturation maturation
mitoses no mitoses no mitoses
Diagnosis, Case 5
• Junctional nevus with severe melanocytic dysplasia, completely excised, see note
• vs. Junctional dysplastic nevus, high grade
• vs Intraepidermal atypical melanocytic proliferation (IAMPUS), cannot r/o MIS– Diagnosis is based on “severe” architectural features
(single cell predominance, low level pagetoid scatter), with mild to moderate cytologic atypia.
– MPATH-Dx Category III (consider excision with up to 5 mm margins, if present at the margin)
5/21/2018
24
Next Case.
Part 2-5. 35728Clinical Information.
An irregular pigmented lesion on the back of a 59 year old manReason for Consultation.
Is this a nevoid melanoma?
Broad, focally highly cellular, asymmetric diffuse fibroplasia and variably sized nests in dermis
5/21/2018
25
• Only minimal pagetoid scatter
• Moderate cytologic atypia
• No mitoses• Cells in dermal
nests are small, nevoid
• No confluent sheetlike growth
HMB46 staining is “top-heavy”(stratified)
• Ki-67 proliferation is minimal in dermis
5/21/2018
26
• p16 staining is positive in a checkerboard pattern, with nuclear and cytoplasmic positivity
Helpful Markers in Nevus vs. Melanoma
• HM45 stratification– J Invest Dermatol. 1993 Mar;100(3):313S-317S. Immunophenotyping of compound and spitz nevi and vertical growth-phase
melanomas using a panel of monoclonal antibodies reactive in paraffin sections.Lazzaro B1, Elder DE, Rebers A, Power L, Herlyn M, Menrad A, Johnson B.
• Low Ki-67 proliferation rate– A zonal comparison of MIB1-Ki67 immunoreactivity in benign and malignant melanocytic lesions.
Li LX, Crotty KA, McCarthy SW, Palmer AA, Kril JJ.Am J Dermatopathol. 2000 Dec;22(6):489-95.
• Preservation of p16 protein expression– More problematical; presence in an atypical tumor at
least precludes homozygous loss of 9p21 and is therefore reassuring but does not preclude diagnosis of melanoma
9p21 Locus
• Contains p16, p14 and p15, all suppressor genes
• Presumably all lost together in cases of homozygous 9p21 loss
• Appears to have special significance in Spitzoid lesions
5/21/2018
27
Your Diagnosis?
Melanoma?
Nevus?
Your Diagnosis?
Dysplastic?
Nondysplastic?
Your Diagnosis?
High Grade?
Low Grade?
5/21/2018
28
Case 5, M59, backFeature Melanoma Dysplastic Nevus Nevus
Size larger intermediate smaller
Cellularity high intermediate lower
Symmetry poor good good
Rete ridges irregular uniformly elongated uniform
Junctional Melanocytes epithelioid mixed (nevoid to epithelioid) nevoid
Poor circumscription common less common uncommon
Nested variable predominantpredominant
Nests coalescent (confluent) bridging discrete
Size of Nests variable uniform uniform
Lentiginous continuous discontinuousdiscontinuous
Pagetoid high, extensive low, focal, minimal minimal
Nuclear atypia uniform atypia, random atypia, minimal,
moderate-severe mild-moderate (1-1.5X) mild
Mitoses - junctional about 1/3 of cases almost always absent absent
Pyknosis/necrosis common uncommon uncommon
Fibroplasia diffuse concentric minimal
Lymphocytes bandlike, lichenoid patchy, perivascular minimal
Regression frequent, extensive or focal rare, minimal absent
Dermal Cells Absent uniform atypia random atypia no atypia
limited maturation maturation maturation
mitoses no mitoses no mitoses
Diagnosis. Case 6, M59.
• Skin, right, mid back: Compound nevus with severe dermal and epidermal dysplasia and dermal fibrosis (“sclerosing atypical nevus”, “fibrosing dysplastic nevus"), extending close or to specimen base and margins, see description and final comment.
• OR - Dysplastic nevus, high grade, with a sclerosing dermal component
• Overall Comment.
• The presence of p16 staining rules out the possibility of 9P21 loss, which has been associated with aggressive behavior in a recent fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study of atypical lesions, most of which were variants of Spitz tumors.
• Despite reassuring findings from special stains (and lack of mitoses), this is objectively an atypical lesion, and complete excision would be recommended, or perhaps alternatively, careful follow-up of the lesional site (MPATH DX Category 2 or 3).
• Especially if this patient should have other clinically atypical nevi and/or a family or personal history of melanoma, consideration of periodic surveillance of his skin would also be appropriate.
19 Lesions with no recurrence (all completely excised)
5/21/2018
29
Papillomatous naevoid melanoma• Papillomatous epithelial strands; dense proliferation; lack of
maturation; atypia; mitoses
• In-transit or lymph node metastases occurred in 33% of patients
Maturing naevoid melanoma• “Change from epithelioid, pleomorphic melanocytes in the
junctional component to … smaller but still atypical cells arranged in nests surrounded by dense collagen”
• “…no disease progression was seen in those with maturing naevoid melanomas (including two with measured thicknesses of 3.0 and 3.5 mm, respectively)”
Significance of Nevi.
• Nevi are important mainly in relation to melanoma
– Precursors – but risk for individual lesions is low
– Risk markers – important mainly in high risk situations
– Simulants – important in everyday clinical decision-making
Case 7.
Clinical Information.Pigmented lesion on the back of a 40 year old
womanReason for Consultation.
Rule out melanoma?
5/21/2018
30
A Lesion of the Back in a 40 Year Old Woman
• “shave biopsy under the left arm … has caused consternation … two of us believing that we are dealing with a … melanoma… two others believing that although worrisome … not yet melanoma”
5/21/2018
31
5/21/2018
32
5/21/2018
33
Your Diagnosis?
Melanoma?
Nevus?
Your Diagnosis?
Dysplastic?
Nondysplastic?
5/21/2018
34
Your Diagnosis?
High Grade?
Low Grade?
Clark’s Dysplastic Nevus vs. Melanoma in Situ vs. Nevus
Feature Melanoma Dysplastic Nevus Nevus
Size tend to be larger intermediate smaller
Symmetry poor good good
Keratinocytes irregular uniform elongated rete uniform
Melanocytes epithelioid mixed nevoid
Nested variable predominant predominant
Nests coalescent bridging discrete
Lentiginous continuous discontinuous discontinuous
Pagetoid high, extensive low, focal, minimal minimal
Nuclear atypia uniform atypia, random atypia, minimal
severe (> 1.5x) mild-moderate
Mitoses about 1/3 of cases almost always absent absent
Fibroplasia diffuse concentric minimal
Lymphocytes bandlike, lichenoid patchy, perivascular minimal
Regression frequent, extensive rare, minimal absent
Diagnosis Rendered
• “malignant melanoma, probably lentigo maligna type, showing Clark level III invasion with early tumorigenic but nonmitogenic vertical growth phase, at a greatest Breslow thickness of 0.30 mm … associated nevus with congenital pattern features”
5/21/2018
35
New Information!
“I received a call from the primary care physician of this patient asking me to review a biopsy from June of 2004, which I had signed out as a compound congenital melanocytic nevus. She told me that the lesion had developed re-pigmentation in the previous biopsy site … ”
• “I think it is almost certain that the subsequent biopsy is a pseudomelanoma based on the fact that there was no atypia in the original shave biopsy specimen, the interval between biopsy and re-pigmentation is only three months, and the re-pigmentation is in the previous biopsy site. The lack of this additional information at the time you received the biopsy was a handicap”
5/21/2018
36
5/21/2018
37
New Report!
“superficial atypical melanocytic proliferation, c/w recurrent nevus phenomenon, extending to specimen margins” … “I would make only one reservation, and that is that this lesion should be re-excised again with a margin of normal skin around the scar and any residual lesion …”
5/21/2018
38
RECURRENT MELANOCYTIC NEVUS
Pseudomelanoma (Ackerman)
– pigmented patch at site of prior shave biopsy of a benign compound or dermal nevus
– repigmentation occurs quickly (6 weeks)
– pigment does not extend beyond scar's borders
RECURRENT MELANOCYTIC NEVUS
Histology
• variably sized and shaped sometimes confluent nests
• single cells & nests above DEJ usually not beyond mid-spinous layer
• occasional lesional cells or nests in dermis
• slight cytologic atypia (“reactive?”), rare mitoses
• proliferation does not extend beyond scar
• original nevus should be reviewed
5/21/2018
39
Lessons
• Atypia in recurrent nevi can be severe, yet is “reactive”.
– Mitoses can be present
– Dermal atypia can be present
• A superficial scar can mimic diffuse fibroplasia seen in many melanomas
• Keep a high index of suspicion
– Consider a full differential diagnosis
– Call for history if necessary
5/21/2018
40
Significance of Nevi.
• Nevi are important mainly in relation to melanoma
– Precursors – but risk for individual lesions is low
– Risk markers – important mainly in high risk situations
– Simulants – important in everyday clinical decision-making
Conclusions
• Former mild dysplasia is a benign lentiginous nevus (the commonest type of nevus)
• Low grade dysplasia (former moderate dysplasia) can be observed clinically or by patients, looking for evidence of changing lesions
• High grade dysplasia is difficult to distinguish from melanoma in situ (UNCERTAINTY), may have competence for local persistence, recurrence and progression, and should be completely excised
• All of these are “melanocytic neoplasms of low (or no) malignant potential” which have little or no competence for metastasis
Lake Wakatipu and Queenstown, New Zealand, from the Top of “The Remarkables”(Mountains of Mordor in the distance)
5/21/2018
41
Session II. High CSD Melanomas and Simulants.
Lentigo maligna melanoma
Atypical lentiginous nevi/proliferations
High CSD: Lentiginous Nevi and Lentigo Maligna
Melanoma and Simulant(s)
• Lentiginous Melanoma of Sun-Damaged Skin
– LMM in situ
– LMM invasive
– Distinction from Dysplastic Nevi (Dysplastic Nevus-like Melanoma/Nevoid Lentigo Maligna
• Lentiginous Nevi of the “Elderly” (i.e. CSD Skin)
• Solar (actinic) lentigo, pigmented AK, SK …
High UV
Pathway II Pathway III
High-CSD Melanoma (LMM)
Desmoplastic Melanoma
? IMP ? IMP
? IAMP ? IAMP
Lentigo maligna melanoma in situ
Melanoma in situ
Lentigo Maligna Melanoma
Desmoplastic Melanoma
NRAS, BRAFnon-V600E, KIT, NF1
NF1, ERBB2, MAP2K1, MAP3K1, BRAF, EGFR, MET,
TERT, CDKN2A, TP53, PTEN, RAC1
TERT, NFKBIE, NRAS PIK3CA PTPN11
5/21/2018
42
Case 1
12438
F64 Lesion of back
5/21/2018
43
5/21/2018
44
Your Diagnosis?
Dysplastic Nevus - IAMP?
Melanoma?
Criteria for Melanoma vs. NeviFeature Melanoma Dysplastic Nevus Superficial Nevus
Size larger intermediate smaller
Symmetry poor good good
Elastosis moderate-severe mild-moderate minimal- mild
Rete ridges irregular uniformly elongated uniform
Junctional Melanocytes epithelioid mixed (nevoid /epithelioid) nevoid
Poor circumscription often less common uncommon
Distribution of Nests variable, irregular predominant, regular predominant, regular
Distribution of Nests coalescent (confluent) bridging discrete
Size of Nests variable uniform uniform
Lentiginous continuous discontinuous minimal
Pagetoid high, extensive low, focal, minimal minimal
Nuclear atypia uniform atypia, random atypia, minimal
severe ( > 1.5x) mild-moderate
Mitoses – junctional about 1/3 of cases almost always absent absent
Pyknosis/necrosis common uncommon none
Fibroplasia diffuse concentric minimal
Lymphocytes bandlike, lichenoid patchy, perivascular minimal
Regression frequent, extensive rare, minimal absent
Dermal Cells uniform atypia random or no atypia no atypia
limited maturation maturation maturation
mitoses no mitoses no mitoses
Our Diagnosis
Case 1 12438
Lentigo maligna melanoma in situ
5/21/2018
45
Case 2.
Part 2-2. 7419Clinical Information.
A large pigmented lesion of the back in a 74-year-old man.Reason for Consultation.
I called this lesion a dysplastic nevus. The clinician then calls back to inform us that this is a 2.2 cm irregular pigmented lesion. Now looking at the deepers we think this
might be a “lentiginous melanoma”.
Description
• Shave biopsy of a broad lesion with a dermal component and a moderately cellular junctional component.
• Lesion is ill-defined (poorly circumscribed) at each periphery, with features overlapping with those of actinic lentigo.
• Subtle increase of melanocytes along the dermal-epidermal junction, with mild to moderate but relatively uniform cytologic atypia.
• Pagetoid scatter is minimal.
• Focally there are elongated rete ridges, overlapping with features of dysplastic nevus, however these changes are focal within the lesion rather than being symmetrically distributed at shoulders adjacent to a dermal component.
Lentiginous nevus versus lentiginous melanoma
• Poorly circumscribed at each periphery
5/21/2018
46
• JunctionaIIAMP
• Patchy lymphocytic infiltrate
• Solar elastosis
Bridging rete
5/21/2018
47
Your Diagnosis?
Melanoma?
Nevus?
Criteria for Melanoma vs. NeviFeature Melanoma Dysplastic Nevus Superficial Nevus
Size larger intermediate smaller
Symmetry poor good good
Elastosis moderate-severe mild-moderate minimal- mild
Rete ridges irregular uniformly elongated uniform
Junctional Melanocytes epithelioid mixed (nevoid /epithelioid) nevoid
Poor circumscription often less common uncommon
Distribution of Nests variable, irregular predominant, regular predominant, regular
Distribution of Nests coalescent (confluent) bridging discrete
Size of Nests variable uniform uniform
Lentiginous continuous discontinuous minimal
Pagetoid high, extensive low, focal, minimal minimal
Nuclear atypia uniform atypia, random atypia, minimal
moderate-severe mild-moderate
Mitoses – junctional about 1/3 of cases almost always absent absent
Pyknosis/necrosis common uncommon none
Fibroplasia diffuse concentric minimal
Lymphocytes bandlike, lichenoid patchy, perivascular minimal
Regression frequent, extensive rare, minimal absent
Dermal Cells uniform atypia random or no atypia no atypia
limited maturation maturation maturation
mitoses no mitoses no mitoses
Lentiginous nevus versus lentiginous melanomaDiagnosis. Case 2, M74
Skin, mid back: Superficial atypical melanocytic proliferation of uncertain significance, most consistent with melanoma in situ, lentiginous type (nevoid lentigo maligna), versus atypical lentiginous nevus of the elderly, see comment.
(i.e. “SAMPUS”)
5/21/2018
48
Diagnosis. Case 2, M74
• Overall Comment.• There are overlapping features among atypical actinic
lentigines, lentiginous junctional nevi with and without atypia, and lentiginous or “nevoid” lentigo maligna.
• Lesions in a high CSD environment must be interpreted with circumspection.
• Overdiagnosis should be avoided as even atypical lentiginous junctional nevi of the elderly seem to be biologically low grade (non-metastasizing but perhaps locally recurring potential).
• It is judicious to completely excise these lesions in order to be sure that they have been completely examined histologically and also to minimize any possibility of local persistence, recurrence or future progression.
Nevoid Lentigo Maligna/Lentiginous Melanoma(Lentiginous Nevus)
• Kossard 1997. Aust J Dermatol Nevoid lentigo malignaKing, Page, Googe & Mihm. Modern Pathology 2005 Lentiginous melanomaFerrahi, Egbert & Swetter J Cutan Pathol 2005 Dysplastic nevus-like LMM
• Clinical diagnosis may vary– e.g. lentigo maligna, atypical nevus, pigmented basal cell carcinoma, seborrheic keratosis and
lentigo.
• Biopsies may mimic junctional nevus or dysplastic nevus, at least focally– Lentiginous proliferation of melanocytes at the dermo-epidermal junction both as single cells
and as small nests with areas of confluent growth, extending to the edges of the biopsy. – Rete ridges maintained– Pagetoid spread of melanocytes was not prominent in H&E - stained sections.
• Diagnosis of melanoma more easily recognized in the complete excision specimens; similar atypical melanocytic proliferation occurring over a broad area flanking the prior biopsy sites.
• Stains for MITF and Mart-1 highlight continuous basal melanocytic proliferation as well as foci of pagetoid scatter.
Lentiginous MelanomaKing, Page, Googe, Mihm. Mod Pathol 2005
• Initial biopsies mimicked lentiginous nevus or dysplastic nevus
• Lentiginous proliferation of melanocytes at DEJ both as single cells and as small nests with areas of confluent growth, extending to the edges of the biopsy.
• Retiform epidermis was maintained and pagetoid spread of melanocytes was not prominent in H&E sections.
• Immunohistochemical stains for MITF and Mart-1 highlighted the extent of the basalar melanocytic proliferation as well as foci of pagetoid spread by melanocytes.
• UNCERTAINTY IS COMMON!• PROGNOSIS IS GOOD IF LESION IS SUPERFICIAL• IMPORTANT TO COMPLETELY EXCISE
• FOR FULL EXAMINATION AND TO MINIMIZE ANY POTENTIAL FOR LOCAL PERSISTENCE, RECURRENCE AND PROGRESSION
Mart 1
MITF
5/21/2018
49
Case 3.
Part 2-3. 14474
Clinical Information.Left posterior shoulder, F81.
Reason for Consultation.Favor a junctional Clark’s nevus (see enclosed report).
• Broad lesion, poorly circumscribed, sparse cellularity, single and nested melanocytes.• Mainly near the dermal-epidermal junction, focal pagetoid scatter• Moderate chronic CSD. • Some bridging, few nests that hang down in a droplet-like pattern. • Cytologic atypia mild but relatively uniform.
5/21/2018
50
Your Diagnosis?
Melanoma?
Nevus?
Diagnosis Case 3, F81
• “Difficult to interpret”. • Cytologic atypia is mild to moderate rather than
severe, with somewhat concerning architectural changes
• “One is somewhat more concerned about a lesion in chronically sun-damaged skin of older subjects”.
• Skin, left posterior shoulder, shave biopsy: Intraepidermal atypical melanocytic proliferation of uncertain significance (IAMPUS), most consistent with atypical lentiginous junctional nevus (of the elderly/CSD skin), cannot r/o evolving or early established melanoma in situ.
• Complete excision recommended (MPATH-Dx 2 or 3)
Case 4.
Part 2-3. 14474
Clinical Information.Left posterior shoulder, F84.
Reason for Consultation.Favor a junctional Clark’s (mildly dysplastic) melanocytic nevus (see
enclosed report). There is mild melanocytic atypia, and that the peripheral and deep margins of the specimen were negative in the
plane of sectioning.
5/21/2018
51
Your Diagnosis?
Melanoma?
Nevus?
Diagnosis Case 4, F81
• Recurrence of Case 8
• Shave biopsy of similar sun-damaged skin• Somewhat more cellular proliferation of nevoid and
nevoid to epithelioid melanocytes, focally exhibiting severe and uniform cytologic atypia.
• Some of these cells are confined to the epidermis above the scar, while others appear to extend some distance beyond the periphery of the scar.
• This latter feature raises some concern for evolving melanoma in situ extending beyond the scar.
5/21/2018
52
• Skin, left posterior shoulder, shave biopsy (recurrence): Intraepidermal atypical melanocytic proliferation of uncertain significance, extending to specimen margins, see description and comment.
– Comment: Cannot rule out an evolving more significant lesion, suggest complete excision
Case 5.
Part 2-3. 14474
Clinical Information.Biopsy from posterior shoulder of an 85 year old female.
Reason for Consultation.This specimen, in my opinion, has histologic features concerning for
melanoma because of the architectural symmetry, ill-defined borders, contiguous proliferation of atypical solitary melanocytes, and some pagetoid spread of melanocytes within the epidermis. I do not see
definitive features of a scar consistent with a prior biopsy site.
5/21/2018
53
• Broad• Moderately
cellular• Moderate to
severe CSD• Poorly
circumscribed• Few bridging
nests• Diffuse
fibroplasia• Cells in dermis
• Moderately cellular
• Moderate to severe CSD
• Nests hanging down
• Diffuse fibroplasia (not a scar)
• Moderately cellular
• Moderate to severe CSD
• Nests hanging down
• Diffuse fibroplasia (not a scar)
• Nests in dermis
• No maturation
5/21/2018
54
Melan-A Stain
• Moderately cellular
• Continuous basal proliferation
• Nests hanging down
• Low level pagetoid scatter
• Nests in dermis
• No maturation
Your Diagnosis?
Melanoma?
Nevus?
Our Diagnosis
Malignant melanoma, lentigo maligna type (“lentiginous melanoma”, Clark level II, Breslow thickness 0.85 mm
5/21/2018
55
Updated History Cases 3-5.
• Clinical Information.
• Three separate biopsies from left posterior shoulder of an 85-year-old female over a period of three years. The biopsies were performed 4 years and 1 year ago, and recently.
• The original biopsy was called a junctional Clark’s (mildly dysplastic) melanocytic nevus, might have been better interpreted as a lentiginous nevus of the elderly/sundamaged skin, with mild to moderate atypia. – The peripheral and deep margins of the specimen were said to be negative in the plane
of sectioning.
• The next biopsy at presumably the same anatomic location was signed out as an atypical melanocytic proliferation consistent with a persistent/recurrent Clark’s (dysplastic) nevus, involving the peripheral edge of the biopsy. – It was mentioned that the differential diagnosis included early melanoma in situ
evolving within a pre-existing nevus, and a reexcision was recommended.
• The most recent specimen was concerning for melanoma because of the architectural symmetry, ill-defined borders, contiguous proliferation of atypical solitary melanocytes, and some pagetoid spread of melanocytes within the epidermis.
• Additional procedure warranted to ensure that the lesion has been completely removed.`
• Broad lesion, poorly circumscribed, sparse cellularity, single and nested melanocytes.• Mainly near the dermal-epidermal junction, focal pagetoid scatter• Moderate chronic CSD. • Cytologic atypia mild but relatively uniform. • POTENTIAL PRECURSOR (low risk) VS ACTUAL PRECURSOR (hindsight bias)• Manage by excision or follow-up
• Case 5
• Second recurrence of a lesion that originally had only “mild” atypia (but moderate to severe architectural disorder)
• Diagnosis of dysplastic nevus should be made with caution in elderly/CSD skin
• Complete excision is appropriate for “atypical lentiginous nevus of elderly/sundamaged skin”.
5/21/2018
56
Last Case.
Part 2-7. 12150
Clinical Information.Lesion of right shoulder, r/o melanoma versus nevus in a 76 y.o. man
Reason for Consultation.Is this anything other than a moderately atypical neurotized compound nevus?
• A relatively broad lesion with irregular thickening and thinning of rete ridges and a sparsely cellular infiltrate in the dermis.
• Generally sparsely cellular• Moderate to severe CSD
Poorly circumscribed
5/21/2018
57
• Pigmented melanophages in the dermis
• Increased number of melanocytes in the epidermis, many of them suprabasal
• Cells in the papillary dermis are delicate spindle cells and there is a sprinkling of lymphocytes
• Cells in the papillary dermis are delicate spindle cells and there is a sprinkling of lymphocytes
5/21/2018
58
S100 stain highlights the increased cellularity in the epidermis and also labels the spindle cells in the papillary dermis
• Melan-A stain highlights the junctional component but the dermal spindle cells are negative.
Case 6
• Skin, right superior shoulder: Malignant melanoma, lentigo maligna type, nonulcerated, with pure desmoplastic vertical growth phase, Clark level IV, Breslow thickness not < 0.64 mm, extending close to the specimen base, see Comment 3.
• Comment• Changes extend close to the base and to a peripheral margin of the
specimen.• It is unusual to see a small desmoplastic melanoma at this early stage of
its evolution. S• Should be excised locally in order to prevent any possibility of persistence,
recurrence, or future progression of it. • Based on its microstaging attributes, the prognosis for this lesion should
be excellent. The prognosis for “pure” desmoplastic melanoma is if anything better than that for melanomas of similar thickness.
• This lesion could be managed with a relatively generous wide local excision – MPATH DX Category 4 (or 5).
5/21/2018
59
Take Home Messages
• Early/evolving LMM IS can be subtle
• Changes at periphery and at margins can be subtle– Confluence or continuous proliferation of uniformly
atypical cells
– Nests in epidermis overlying elastotic dermis (LeBoit)
• Focal areas in LMM IS can mimic dysplastic nevus– Diagnosis of dysplastic nevus in sun-damaged skin of
elderly is fraught with hazard
• Diagnosis is often based more on architectural disorder(including size) than on severe cytologic atypia.
High CSD Lesions
• Cautious approach – beware of nests of melanocytes in epidermis above solar elastosis
• Caution in diagnosis of dysplastic nevus in CSD skin
• Do not overcall actinic atypia in re-excision specimens (more of a risk marker than a precursor)
• Beware of subtle spindle cells in dermal component of CSD melanomas
5/21/2018
60
2 Melanocytic Tumours2-0 Introduction to melanocytic tumours
2-1A Pathway concept
2-1B Genomic landscape of melanoma
2-1 Nodular, nevoid, and metastatic melanomas
2-2A Nodular melanoma
2-2B Nevoid melanoma
2-2C Metastatic melanoma
2-2 Melanoma in Intermittently sun-exposed skin, and simulants/precursors
2-3A Superficial spreading melanoma
2-3B Simple lentigo, junctional naevus, compound naevus, dermal naevus
2-3C Speckled lentiginous naevus and naevus spilus
2-3D Dysplastic nevi
2-3E Special site nevi – breast, axilla, scalp, ear
2-3F Halo naevus
2-3G Meyerson nevus
2-3H Deep penetrating naevus
2-3I Recurrent naevus
2-3 Melanoma in chronically sun-exposed skin, and simulants/precursors
2-4A Lentigo maligna melanoma
2-4B Desmoplastic melanoma
2-4C Lentiginous naevus
2-4 Melanoma in acral skin and simulants/precursors
2-5A Acral melanoma
2-5B Acral naevus
2-5 Melanoma arising from blue naevus, and simulants/precursors
2-6A Melanoma arising from blue naevus
2-6B Blue naevus, cellular blue naevus
2-6C Pigmented epithelioid melanocytoma
2-6D Mongolian spot
2-6E Naevus of Ito and Ota
2-6F Combined naevus
2-6 Melanoma arising in congenital naevi and simulants/precursors
2-7A Melanoma arising in a giant congenital naevus
2-7B Congenital melanocytic naevus, junctional naevus, compound naevus
2-7C Proliferative nodules in congenital naevi
2-7 Spitz Tumours
2-8A Malignant Spitz tumour
2-8B Spitz naevus / tumour
2-8C Pigmented spindle cell naevus/tumour (Reed)
2-8 Genital and mucosal melanomas, and precursors/simulants
2-9A Mucosal melanoma (genital, oral, sinonasal)
2-9B Genital naevi
2-9 Ocular melanoma
2-10A Uveal melanoma
2-10B Conjunctival melanoma
2018 Proposed Classification of Melanoma, Precursors and Simulants
2 Melanocytic Tumours
2-3 Melanoma in chronically sun-exposed skin, and simulants/precursors
2-4A Lentigo maligna melanoma
2-4B Desmoplastic melanoma
2-4C Lentiginous naevus
2018 Proposed Classification of Melanoma, Precursors and Simulants
Benign
Borderline
Malignant
Site
Epithelium associated
High UV
CSDDesmopl.
melanoma
Glabrous Mucosa
Acralmelanoma
Mucosal melanoma
Low UV
Acquired nevus
Dysplastic nevus
Non-CSDmelanoma
Spitz nevus
Atypical Spitz tumor
Spitzoid melanoma
NRAS
HRAS
BRAF
KIT
Fusions
Bastian 2014