Summary Video Distribution Process
-
Upload
thomas-bachet -
Category
Business
-
view
87 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Summary Video Distribution Process
Dutch Media Hub – business intelligence Report 2 – B2B video facility process
Menno Bangma, Thomas Bachet, Frits Klok
2
Presentation outline
Content distribution chain
Market analysis
Market developments
County profiles
3
Content Distribution chain
Content provider
Distributor/aggregator
Consumer
Digital Media
ServicesFacilitator
Digital Media
ServicesFacilitator
Digital Media
ServicesFacilitator
Cinema Rental
Retail (Pay) TV
VoD
Catch-Up
4
Complete overview of the digital media distribution proces
IPTV/CaTV VoD platform
cinema reel replication Booker
35mm subtitling facilities
Cinema’s
Optical Media Replication
DVD/Blu-ray rental and
retailer
Digital cinema platform (future)
Linear Broadcast Playout
Web VoD platform
IPTV/CaTVCatchUp TV platform
Mobile On Demand Platform
STBTV
STB
Web Catch-up TV platform
STB
PCMedia
extender
PC
Mobile
In House Digital Media Services
Archiving- digitization- storage
Media Asset Management- meta-data- subs, dubs- …
Enterprise encoding
Digital Media Service facilitator:
Enterprise encoding
Authoring & encoding
subtitling
dubbing
Content Providers: - Majors - Independents- Broadcasters- etc.
Media Asset Management- meta-data- subs, dubs- …
Postal Service
Digital Distr. network
Postal Service
Digital Distr.
network
Archiving- digitization- storage
Digital Distr.
network
Facilitating service in DMH scopeFacilitating service out of DMH scope
Service Provider in DMH scopeService Provider out of DMH scope
5
Service Providers (retail outlets)
Content Providers
Majors
Indies
Broadcasters
Others
Many existing cross relations for the Benelux market
KPN
Ziggo
Belgacom
UPC
Telenet
Tele2
TEG
Stervideotheek
Digital Media Services facilitator
OD Media
The Site
Videohouse
Parkpost
DMC
Sony DADC
UBF
In the Benelux the market is fragmented with respect to Digital Media Services facilitators
There are about seven large Digital Media Services faciliattors
These parties have relationships with one or more content providers and provide that
content to one or more retail outlets.
6
Presentation outline
Content distribution chain
Market analysis
Market developments
County profiles
7
United Kingdom
Almost every household has access to TV in the UK. The TV market is dominated by digital terrestrial (56%) followed by satellite (31%). The technologies that supports Video on Demand on TV, digital cable (11%) and IPTV (2%), are in the minority.
The broadband penetration in the united kingdom is above average. Almost 63% of the households has access to a broadband connection. Although it is not defined what speeds are delivered and these results vary dependent of the supplier of the connection and the subscription, it is save to say that these people probably can use their connection to make use of video of demand.
In the United Kingdom consumers clearly prefer buying physical media over renting. Based on the amount of transactions shown in the table, slightly more that 75% of the transactions are sales transactions. This means that the introduction of a Video on Demand service needs to respond on this in some way.
Potential VoD channels: Online, Digital Cable & IPTV
8
20-01-20118
United Kingdom 20-01-20118
SATELLITE Sky AnytimeCABLE FilmFlex (virgin media) Sasktel Vrigin Media Cable TV TopUpTv Sky boxIPTV BT Vision TalkTalk TV Xbox Live marketplace PlaystationWEB SeeSaw Lovefilm.com Blinkbox
VOD TYPE Unique Viewers (mln) TV 15.2 Web 15.0 Mobile 3.0Total Audience 24.4
14 pure vod service are available in the UK 06/2010 (EAO, 2011)
Suppliers
The business model that is most common in the UK is the rental download model. Download to own follows, with eight providers offering this product.
The largest video on demand provider, Lovefilm, offers physical- and digital streaming rental. The all you can eat model is popular under consumers.
Research results shows that people who watch Video on Demand are using both TV and Web. This suggest that cable, IPTV and web vod suppliers have an equal user base. But video on demand in these results includes also TV content. It is possible that users don’t mind using the pc to watch TV shows, but want to view movies on a large screen because of the experience.
Usage of Video on Demand in the UK during 1 month. (2010)
There are several video on demand suppliers. The most are pure vod service that offer vod via the web.
IPTV is relatively small
Leading Business Models
Medium usage
9
European country overview
We assessed European countries on three metrics:
Metric Indication
cable penetration high cable penetration means that there is an infrastructure available suitable for cable VoD services
broadband penetration > 2 Mbps high broadband penetration indicates a suitable infrastructure available for web VoD or IPTV VoD services
Number of DVDs rented and sold per household in 2006 (best selling year)
high DVD sales and rental figures indicates willingness to spend money for film services and a need for film distributors to migrate to the digital channel
10
VoD potential in Europe
BE
NL
NO SE
Fi
DK
CHATGR
SL
SR
HR
BGRO
HU
CZ
PL
DE
UK
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Cable TV adoption (2010)
Bro
ad
ba
nd
pe
ne
tra
tion
(>
2M
bp
s, 2
01
0)
0-7
DVD rental + sales per HH (in year 2006)
7-14
>14
N/A Low VoD potential Cable VoD potential
Web and IPTV VoD potential Full VoD potential
11
Conclusions country overview
Northern European countries have high VoD potential
Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Germany, Netherlands, Belgium all have a cable
penetration and broadband penetration (>2 Mbps) over 50%
UK is typically a Web VoD country, due to the low penetration of cable networks
Other promising countries are Finland, Hungary, Romania, Switzerland, Austria, Bulgaria
Note that Hungary and Romania have a very fragmented cable market
Austria and Switzerland have a strong presence of UPC, which uses DMC for Digital
Media Services facilities
Other countries have limited VoD potential for the near future
Poland and Czech Republic have a rather low broadband penetration and cable market
Slovenia and Croatia (HR) are small markets
Greece has almost no cable infrastructure
12
10 januari 2011M Bouman
TNO Nieuwe huisstijl
12
• Some providers offer VoD services or TV services in multiple countries
• HBO
• UPC
• Sony
• Amazon
• Apple
• Telenor
• T-home
• RDS-RCS
Large players
13
• HBO (Home Box Office), is an American premium cable television network, owned by Time Warner
• HBO offers PayTV channels in 12 Central and East European countries, Cyprus, UK and Ireland (tbdhttp://corporate.sky.com/media/press_releases/2010/sky_atlantic.htm)
• HBO on-demand is a subscription VoD services available in 8 central European countries, Cyprus and UK
• HBO Go is a transactional VoD service available in the US. In Europe it has launched in Poland at a small operator (INEA) and expected to spread across all active countries. (http://www.bizpoland.pl/news/index.php?contentid=203576)
• In the UK and Italy, HBO is available as svod on Mobile TV.
HBO
14
• UPC Broadband is a Pan-European Communications company owned by Liberty Global providing bundled cable television, internet and telephone services.
• UPC cable TV services and Internet services are available in 11 European countries.
• In Netherlands, Belgium, Austria, Switzerland, Hungary and Poland VoD services are available as well.
• UPC Direct the Satellite service is avlaiavle in Czech, Hungary, Slovenia and Romaina.
• In all countries UPC is the largest or 2nd largest cable operator. RCS&RDS is reported to acquire UPC Romania.
• DMC (chellomedia) provides the Digital Media Services management for UPC, which performs the video facility functions , similar to the ambition of the Dutch Media Hub.
UPC
15
Google - Youtube• Youtube is the no 1 video portal for user
generated videos worldwide
• Youtube adds ~35 hours of video material each minute
• In the US, YouTube does have a movie rental service in cooperation with the Sundance Film festival
• However, there are as yet no contract with major US studios for rental of Hollywood blockbusters.
• Recently, YouTube denied coming to Europe to start a premium video rental service.
16
Sony Qriocity
• Sony launched the Qriocity media service for streaming music, games, e-books and video in the US in April 2010.
• The service is available on Sony Blu-ray players, personal computers, the PlayStation 3, BRAVIA televisions and some portable music players.
• It launched in Europe end of 2010 and is now available in United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland, Italy, Germany, France, Spain, Portugal.
• The service offers films from all the major film studio’s.
17
20-01-201117
Amazon
- Amazon has experience with video on demand in the US with “Amazon Instant Video”. Amazon has its own distribution network.
- By buying Lovefilm it will target the European market. Lovefilm is available in 5 countries and provides customers with physical and online movie rentals.
- Online movie rentals can be accessed by personal computer and game consoles.
- In the UK lovefilm is the dominant online DVD rental outlet and surpasses 10 million subscribers.
18
20-01-201118
Apple- Apple has its own platform (iTunes) for
content distribution that is well integrated with the hardware they sell.
- In the US iTunes took the lion’s share of the online film market. It earned 248.3 million dollar, or 64.5% of the total consumer spending on VOD.
- In Europe iTunes movie store is available in the UK and Ireland, Germany and France. In 2011 it is expected that other countries will follow (NL).
- iTunes movie store offers both electronic sell through and movie rentals. Films of most of the major studios are available.
19
10 januari 2011M Bouman
TNO Nieuwe huisstijl
19
• Deutsche Telekom brands its TV solution under the name T-home.
• IPTV: Germany, Greece, Hungary, Slovakia and Croatia.
• SAT: Hungary, Slovakia
• Cable: Hungary
• RCS-RDS is a Romanian company offering Digi satellite service with a focus on low cost TV service without VoD.
• Sat: Hungary, Serbia, Croatia, Slovakia, Czech Republic.
• Telenor provides TV services in the Nordic region under the brand Canal Digital to a total of 2.9 subscribers:
• Satellite: Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Finland
• Cable: Norway, Sweden, Denmark
• IPTV: Sweden, Denmakr
• DTT: Finland
Multi-region Operators
20
Conclusions large players
There are some large industry players active offering Pan European
VoD services
Most players already have existing partnerships or their own
infrastructure to distribute this content throughout Europe
21
Presentation outline
Content distribution chain
Market analysis
Market developments
County profiles
22
Drivers for VoD
Generate revenues
• The film industry faces a digital challenge due to the reduction of DVD/BD sales and rental.
• TV Service Providers can make extra income by selling premium TV packages and Pay Per View content.
• Broadcasters offering premium access to TV content through pay per view items:
• tomorrow’s episode now
• missed episodes
• not broadcasted series
Competitive differentiation
• Most operators offer triple play with very similar features.
• VoD offers a promotional element to differentiate from competitors.
• Many countries have fierce competition for TV services.
• Virgin vs Freeview vs Sky
•T-home vs Premiere vs Kabel Deutschland
• Telenet vs Belgacom
•KPN vs Ziggo and UPC
•UPC vs T-home vs DigiTV
Technology push
• Broadband connections enable distribution of high quality video content
• All devices are capable of playback video: Mobiles, Tablets, PCs, STB, TVs
• VoD may be something consumers will like and won’t give up once they have it.
23
Barriers for VoD: Content licensing
The VoD distribution window for recent films lasts for three months. After that the film enters a blackout period for the PayTV and free TV window. The rest of the VoD offer is filled with older library titles. This model will only very slowly evolve.VoD films of the major studio’s are sold with minimum guarantees. This makes a mature VoD offer costly. Only large players are capable of creating a proper VoD service.There are no contracts sold yet for minimum guarantees to a wholesaler that serves many underlying (and competing) VoD service providers. The Dutch Media Hub cannot act as a central clearing point for content licensing costs.
Cinema
Rental/Sales
Pay TV
freeTV
premiere 3-4 month 14 mth 24 mth9 mth
VoD VoDblack-out period
24
Barriers for VoD: Reduced potential of web video on demand
Consumers prefer watching content on a TV screenHowever, only 7% of the people have connected their PC to their TV. Therefore, current Web VoD offers have not reached full potential yet.The adoption of Internet connected TVs serves as an opportunity for this barrier.
25
Opportunities for the DMH
The physical disc spend decline is
manifest in Europe
Therefore the opportunity for VoD
service is available in all countries
Some markets very fragmented with many cable providers
(Poland, Hungary, Romania)
Most cable providers are to small to acquire independent
interactive platform.
Most Satellite and DTT operators don’t offer VoD services yet
Local content still very popular
Localization of content required to meet local regulations.
Providing the facilitating service for VoD providers
Provide facilitating services for SAT, DTT and small cable TV service providers.
Focussing on local content for local markets
26
Threats for the DMH
Large majors may partner with few large Internet VoD providers to serve
complete European market.
Amazon Lovefilm, HBO and iTunes are large players with their own
systems and business relationships.
It is very difficult for the Dutch Media Hub to gain a position here.
Streaming video via the web is on the rise.
Content Delivery Networks become more important. Players like Akamai
and Limelight have global footprint
Platforms can be created by combining CDN providers with large scale
VoD platform provider to create global reach.
Local content is one of the opportunities for the Dutch Media Hub.
However the fragmented nature of most markets requires a good
knowledge of those markets and players in detail.
Globalisation of content of majors
Consolidation of Internet VoD formats and platforms
Limited knowledge of local markets