Summary of the Fairtrade Foundation Discussion Paper › ~ › media › fairtradeuk... · Why...

2
Its not The air milestha t ma tter! As popular understanding of climate change grows, so people understandably seek ways in which they can take action to reduce the negative impact of their behaviour on the environment. Many ethical consumers have faced the dilemma of whether to buy Fairtrade or local. People worry that products imported from developing countries have a heavier impact on the environment due to the distance they travel. But the reality is not that simple. An increasing body of evidence shows that it is simply wrong to assume that products from developing countries automatically have a worse impact on the climate and the environment than products grown in the UK or Europe. Some key facts: • The vast majority of Fairtrade products are transported into the UK by ship. Of all Africa’s export of fruit and vegetables, 90% travels by ship, which has the lowest per tonne impact of any transport mode. Air freight accounts for only 0.3% of total UK greenhouse gas emissions against the 8% associated with meat and dairy production. • The distance a product has travelled is often not significant in terms of a product’s total life-cycle emissions. It is far more relevant to consider the total carbon footprint of a product. For instance, an analysis of the lifecycle emissions for a cup of tea, carried out for Cafédirect, found that 93% of the carbon emissions from a daily cup of Teadirect comes from boiling the kettle. • Under the right conditions, agricultural exports can help reduce poverty. Research has shown that export agriculture is critical in reducing rural poverty in Uganda and Vietnam. Far from displacing food production, export success in both countries has gone hand in hand with an increase in output of basic food staples. What reall y ma tters? Our response to the climate crisis, from the individual to the global level, should not only be environmentally effective, but should also have justice and equity at its heart. If we really want to make a substantial reduction in food-related carbon emissions, there are many other choices we can make as individual consumers that can have a significant impact on carbon emissions, without compromising opportunities for producers in developing countries. Send us your feedback Read our full discussion paper at www.fairtrade.org.uk/climatereport We welcome your feedback, especially any additional information, case studies or suggestions for how the Fairtrade movement as a whole can respond to the challenge of climate change. Please email [email protected] Using public transport is one way to reduce our carbon footprint Summary of the Fairtrade Foundation Discussion Paper October 2009

Transcript of Summary of the Fairtrade Foundation Discussion Paper › ~ › media › fairtradeuk... · Why...

It’s not The ‘air miles’ that matter!

As popular understanding of climate change grows, so people understandably seek ways in which they can take action to reduce the negative impact of their behaviour on the environment. Many ethical consumers have faced the dilemma of whether to buy Fairtrade or local. People worry that products imported from developing countries have a heavier impact on the environment due to the distance they travel.

But the reality is not that simple. An increasing body of evidence shows that it is simply wrong to assume that products from developing countries automatically have a worse impact on the climate and the environment than products grown in the UK or Europe.

Some key facts: • The vast majority of Fairtrade products are transported into

the UK by ship. Of all Africa’s export of fruit and vegetables, 90% travels by ship, which has the lowest per tonne impact of any transport mode. Air freight accounts for only 0.3% of total UK greenhouse gas emissions against the 8% associated with meat and dairy production.

• The distance a product has travelled is often not significant in terms of a product’s total life-cycle emissions. It is far more relevant to consider the total carbon footprint of a product. For instance, an analysis of the lifecycle emissions for a cup of tea, carried out for Cafédirect, found that 93% of the carbon emissions from a daily cup of Teadirect comes from boiling the kettle.

• Under the right conditions, agricultural exports can help reduce poverty. Research has shown that export agriculture is critical in reducing rural poverty in Uganda and Vietnam. Far from displacing food production, export success in both countries has gone hand in hand with an increase in output of basic food staples.

What really matters?Our response to the climate crisis, from the individual to the global level, should not only be environmentally effective, but should also have justice and equity at its heart. If we really want to make a substantial reduction in food-related carbon emissions, there are many other choices we can make as individual consumers that can have a significant impact on carbon emissions, without compromising opportunities for producers in developing countries.

Send us your feedbackRead our full discussion paper at www.fairtrade.org.uk/climatereportWe welcome your feedback, especially any additional information, case studies or suggestions for how the Fairtrade movement as a whole can respond to the challenge of climate change. Please email [email protected]

Using public transport is one way to reduce our carbon footprint

Summary of the Fairtrade Foundation Discussion Paper October 2009

Why climate change is an issue for the Fairtrade movement

challenges for poor producers in adapting to climate change

How Fairtrade can support PRODUCERS in adapting to climate change

Poor farmers are renowned for their adaptability and resilience in the face of adverse weather and other challenging conditions. However, as climate change creates ever more erratic and less predictable weather patterns, farmers will find their accumulated experience a less reliable guide to the future than it has been in the past. In response to this unpredictability, poor farmers will often be pushed into lower risk and therefore less profitable activities. Without the right support they could sink ever deeper into a ‘poverty trap’, forced to concentrate on survival rather than following their aspirations and improving their lives.

There are a number of reasons why poorer farming communities in developing countries are at a particular disadvantage to be able to react to climate change. These include: • Poor rural areas often lack insurance and credit services

• There is always a cost associated with a switch to different farming practices and poor farmers often do not have the knowledge and money to support a switch

• Switching away from what you know is inherently risky and poorer farmers are less able to accept risk than the relatively better off and will tend to diversify towards lower risk, and therefore less profitable activities

In Uganda, Florence Madamu, from Bulirehe village in Bundibugyo district says:

‘We’ve stopped even adopting seasonal planting, because it’s so useless. Now we just try all the time. We used to plant in March and that’d be it. Now we plant and plant again. We waste a lot of seeds that way, and our time and energy. We regret it so often, why we planted. Then we have to plan to acquire other seeds, and the seeds here are very costly. Sometimes you feel like crying. Sometimes you’ve hired labour and you end up losing all that money for preparing your land’1.

At the simplest level, climate change is not fair. The science tells us that climate change is already happening and will continue to happen with increasingly severe impacts.

Those at the heart of the Fairtrade movement, poor farmers and workers in developing countries (who have done least to cause the mess), are at the very frontline of the climate crisis. These communities are reporting that climate change is already having a significant impact on their livelihoods and their wellbeing.

Baluku Yofesi, the Executive Director of the Karughe Farmers Partnership in Kasese district of Western Uganda:

‘We used to have much more rainfall than we are having now, that’s one big change, and to me this area is hotter than 20 years ago. Because of the shortened rains you have to go for early maturing varieties and now people are trying to select these. That’s why some local varieties of pumpkins and cassava that need a lot of rain, even varieties of beans, have disappeared.’

Willington Wamayeye, Managing Director of Gumutindo Coffee Co-operative (a supplier to Fairtrade company, Cafédirect):

‘Rains now fall heavily for a short period and our dry season is much longer. The coffee plants are badly affected – flowering is stopping. Last year alone we lost about 40% of our production.’

The Fairtrade movement has always fought to support small farmers in their quest to find solutions to the challenges they face. As the climate crisis looms we will continue to do so. Our experience and networks mean that we are uniquely placed to play a specific role in the global response to climate change.

Fairtrade is one way we in the richer world can help support poor producers as climate change kicks in.

The payment of an agreed minimum price and the additional Fairtrade premium in the Fairtrade system has already allowed producers to invest in diversifying and strengthening their business. In some cases, Fairtrade has begun to help alleviate the problem of limited credit availability through the option of setting up micro finance schemes using the Fairtrade premium. There are also many examples where producer groups have used their Fairtrade premium in ways that reduce carbon emissions and make them less vulnerable to future energy price rises.

However, given the potential scale and impact of climate change it is clearly important for the Fairtrade movement to consider what else it could be doing. Ideas already in discussion include:

• Building the capacity of Fairtrade co-operatives and networks to co-ordinate with other parts of civil society to share information, plan and act on climate change

• Developing public/private partnerships, like Cafédirect’s innovative AdapCC programme, to help channel funds directly and effectively to vulnerable communities: www.adapcc.org

• Developing new credit and financing mechanisms within the Fairtrade system, building on models already in place, eg the technical assistance fund established by the Fairtrade Foundation to support African producers

• Developing a debate putting Fairtrade, and more broadly, equity and fairness, at the heart of the concept of sustainability, and raising awareness within the citizens’ movement for Fairtrade of how to reduce your carbon footprint and increase your social footprint – buy less, but buy better

Willington Wamayeye, Uganda

School built using Fairtrade premium funds, Mali

Mamouna Keita, Mali

1 Oxfam (2008), Turning up the Heat: Climate change and poverty in Uganda (Oxfam GB).