Sukuk & Islamic Banking - World Bankpubdocs.worldbank.org/en/45691448479781452/pdf/... · LT Sukuk...
Transcript of Sukuk & Islamic Banking - World Bankpubdocs.worldbank.org/en/45691448479781452/pdf/... · LT Sukuk...
Sukuk & Islamic BankingTapping a Growing Pool of Islamic Liquidity
November 2015, IstanbulKHALID FERDOUS HOWLADAR, GLOBAL HEAD – ISLAMIC FINANCE
This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history.
2Dynamics of Demand for Islamic Finance to fund Long-Term Investments
Agenda
1 - Islamic Banks
A Growing Pool of Islamic Liquidity
2 - Sukuk Market
Growing and Diversifying
3Dynamics of Demand for Islamic Finance to fund Long-Term Investments
Islamic Banks
A Fast Growing Pool of Islamic Liquidity1
4Dynamics of Demand for Islamic Finance to fund Long-Term Investments
Islamic BanksAssets of Islamic finance institutions continue to grow at a faster rate than conventional banks assets
Sources:
Central Banks data - Qatar, Bahrain, Malaysia and Turkey banking systems.
Annual reports and Moody's BFM data for rated banks - UAE, KSA and Kuwait.
Annual reports for non rated banks in UAE and KSA.
Islamic windows assumptions for UAE, KSA and Bahrain.
Data as of December 2008 and December 2013 for all banking systems.
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
UAE
KSA
Kuwait
Qatar
Bahrain
Malaysia
Turkey
Financing of Islamic banks CAGR (2008-13)
Financing of conventional banks CAGR (2008-13), excluding Islamic windows for UAE, KSA & Bahraincountries
5Dynamics of Demand for Islamic Finance to fund Long-Term Investments
Islamic BanksIslamic finance enjoys strong penetration in many markets but still has room to grow
Sources:
* Total Assets data used for Oman banking system.
Central Bank data - UAE, KSA, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, Malaysia and Turkey.
Annual reports and Moody's BFM data for rated banks- UAE, KSA, Kuwait/ Annual reports for non rated banks – UAE and KSA
Islamic windows assumptions included in Islamic financing for UAE, KSA and Bahrain.
** Oman data from Thomson Reuters study, dated June 2014/ Data as of YE2013 for all banking systems except Oman
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Oman ** UAE KSA Kuwait Qatar Bahrain Malaysia Turkey
US
D b
illio
nTotal Islamic Financing Market share of Islamic financing
6Dynamics of Demand for Islamic Finance to fund Long-Term Investments
Sukuk Markets
Growing, Extending & Diversifying2
7Dynamics of Demand for Islamic Finance to fund Long-Term Investments
Global Short-Term & Long-Term Sukuk IssuancesVolumes falling in line with fixed income trends in the GCC & Emerging Markets
2012 was an outlier year due to strong EM inflows and 2014 saw Malaysian issuance reductions offset by new volumes from entrants such as UK, Luxembourg, South Africa, and Hong Kong.
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Jun-15
$ B
illio
n
Sovereign Government-related entity Other Corporate Financial Institution < 1 Year Sukuk Paper
Sources: Islamic Finance Information Service, Moody’s estimates
8Dynamics of Demand for Islamic Finance to fund Long-Term Investments
Sukuk Issuance TrendsMaturities are extending with five and ten year buckets the most common
9Dynamics of Demand for Islamic Finance to fund Long-Term Investments
Sukuk Issuance TrendsLonger Maturities are becoming more common
1 - 5 yrs 30%
5 - 10 yrs 43%
10 - 20 yrs 20%
> 20 yrs 7%
LT Sukuk Paper Outstanding (H1 2015) - By
1 - 5 yrs48%
5 - 10 yrs 34%
10 - 20yrs 13%
> 20 yrs 5%
LT Sukuk Paper Issued by Tenor 2001- 2014
10Dynamics of Demand for Islamic Finance to fund Long-Term Investments
Infrastructure Financing Drives Longer MaturitiesInfrastructure Sukuk concentrated in Malaysia
10
Infrastructure Sukuk Outstanding by Obligor’s Country
Huge infrastructure needs in the GCC, Asia and Africa will boost infrastructure Sukukissuance going forward
Source: IFIS, Moody’s estimates
Malaysia69%
Saudi Arabia19%
U.A.E8%
Others4%
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Malaysia Saudi Arabia United Arab Emirates Others
Infrastructure Sukuk Issuance per Year / Obligor’s Country ($ million)
11Dynamics of Demand for Islamic Finance to fund Long-Term Investments
MYR54%USD 25%
SAR 7%
IDR 3%
QAR 3%
AED 2%
LT Sukuk Issuance by Currency 2001-2014
- 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000
United Arab Emirates
Saudi Arabia
Qatar
Turkey
Malaysia
Indonesia
Hong Kong
Bahrain
Kuwait
Pakistan
Others
International Sukuk Issuance by Country
Issued in 2014
Total Outstanding
International Sukuk Issuances are IncreasingGCC states’ US dollar issuances are driving sukuk globalisation
MYR42%
USD 34%
SAR 8%
QAR 7%
IDR 6%Others 3%
LT Sukuk Issuance by Currency in 2014
12Dynamics of Demand for Islamic Finance to fund Long-Term Investments
Sukuk Market: Drivers of Growth
The drivers of this continued growth include
– global investors’ increasing familiarity with sukuk instruments
– increasing ‘Islamic’ investment liquidity looking for sukuk
– increasing retail & corporate demand for Islamic financial services
– increasing standardisation of unsecured sukuk structures
– increased policy support from governments of Muslim and now non-Muslim countries
2015/2016 Sukuk issuance trends & drivers
– Major reductions in 2015 Malaysian Sukuk paper market on the back of lower short term issuance from Bank Negara and some fiscal consolidation
– Uncertainty regarding US rate rise and difficult conditions in the GCC have hit regional issuance for 2015
– Declining liquidity in the GCC (due to low oil prices) coupled with modest/strong growth is forcing GCC banks to tap longer term funding
– Sovereign deficits compounded by high social spending and investment needs are pushing GCC governments to issue bonds/sukuk
–
Drivers are strong and market is globalizing
13Dynamics of Demand for Islamic Finance to fund Long-Term Investments
Quick Note - Asset Backed Sukuk
Shari’ah strongly encourages asset-backed finance. Principles of Tangibility, Asset ownership, risk/profit sharing are inherent in such structures
However the failures of conventional securitisation (e.g. sub-prime) in the global crisis and regional preferences for name-lending has meant little appetite for asset-backed instruments despite the fact that (rated) asset-backed sukuk performed much better than their asset-based (unsecured) counterparts
Islamic securitisation is well suited for longer-term assets and project finance. Assets and liabilities are perfectly match funded with genuine risk transfer. It provides lower funding costs plus a market-based valuation for securitised assets.
However Islamic banks not keen to support longer term projects given their own heavy short-term funding bias and regional institutional investor base is weak.
Better suited for long term financing
15Dynamics of Demand for Islamic Finance to fund Long-Term Investments
BANKING
Khalid HowladarGlobal [email protected]
Olivier PanisNorth Africa & [email protected]
Nitish Bhojnagarwala Middle [email protected]
Mik Kabeya Sub-Saharan Africa [email protected]
BANKING
Arif Bekiroglu [email protected]
Simon Chen Asia [email protected]
Eugene Tarzimov Asia [email protected]
David Fanger North [email protected]
INSURANCE
Antonello AquinoEurope, Middle East and [email protected]
Mohammed Ali Riyazuddin Londe Europe, Middle East & North [email protected]
Graeme KnowdAsia [email protected]
Sally YimAsia [email protected]
CORPORATE
Rehan AkbarMiddle East & North [email protected]
Nidhi DhruvAsia Pacific+ [email protected]
Vincent TordoAsia [email protected]
Maisam HasnainAsia [email protected]
SOVEREIGN
Gabriel [email protected]
Aurelien MaliAfrica [email protected]
Mathias AngoninMiddle East & North [email protected]
Christian de GuzmanAsia [email protected]
Islamic Finance Group Contacts
16Dynamics of Demand for Islamic Finance to fund Long-Term Investments
© 2015 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.
CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (“MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.
MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO CONSIDER MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS IN MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s Publications.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.
To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.
NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”
For Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail clients. It would be dangerous for “retail clients” to make any investment decision based on MOODY’S credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.
For Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.
MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.
MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.