Suitability of Wind Power - Texas Architecturethe analysis on the suitability of wind power for...

Suitability of Wind Power for Texas Urban Areas

Jenna Kamholz School of Architecture

University of Texas

December 13, 2008 CRP 386

Suitability of Wind Power for Texas Urban Areas CRP 386 Jenna Kamholz Fall 2008

2

Executive Summary The limitations of fossil fuel resources are being felt in rising prices as well as political conflicts. Among other things, we are going to have to begin to rely more on clean and renewable sources of energy in order to sustain our civilization. Wind power can play a large role in the solution to the current energy and environmental crisis. Its non-polluting nature, and its increasing cost effectiveness, the compatibility of wind power with other land uses, and the abundance of the wind resources and all qualify it as a powerful option for meeting future energy needs. Texas’ size and varied climate makes it the state with the most potential in terms of renewable resources. According to InfinitePower.org, the annual wind power available in Texas is approximately 250,000 MW, almost four times the amount of electricity currently produced in the state. In addition, wind farms could play a major role in developing the vast rural areas of Texas many of which are currently experiencing depopulation. With the growing necessity to switch to clean, renewable energy sources it is imperative that we identify areas of unmet potential. This project focused on determining locations in Texas suitable to produce wind power to supply the energy demands of urban areas. An examination of existing conditions and future growth predictions was be used to determine which Texas counties have the greatest possibility as future centers of renewable energy. The majority of the data used in this analysis came from the Texas General Land Office. Other sources include the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the Alternative Energy Institute at West Texas A&M University, the Berkeley/Penn Urban and Environmental Modeler’s Datakit and The GeoCommunity website. To conduct the analysis on the suitability of wind power for Texas urban areas I researched the qualities that were both positive factors and negative factors in siting wind farms. I classified factors into three categories. First, favorable conditions included adequate wind power, low sloping land, and proximity to roads and utility lines. Second, constraining factors included urban areas, forested areas, major water features, and protected landscapes. Thirdly, population factors included growing demand centers and areas in need of new industry. After individually mapping these factors, they were overlayed to reveal the locations with the greatest potential in terms of demand and need. The findings support the initial hypothesis that Texas has a lot of potential sites that are adequate for wind power facilities as well as growing power needs. However, it appears that natural and existing man made conditions should not be the main determining factor in selected sites for new wind farms. Rather, changes in future population will have the greatest effect on the location demand and industry need. Based on this study the thirteen identified counties: Hardeman, Foard, Baylor, Callahan, Motley, Dickens, Kent, Fisher, Coke, Jeff Davis, Refugio, San Patricio, Aransas are the prime locations for wind farms by the presence of favorable sites without constrains, their need for industry and their proximity to growing counties. These counties should conduct further analysis at the local level to determine land availability and local interest.


3

Introduction

The limitations of fossil fuel resources are being felt in rising prices as well as political conflicts. We are relying increasingly on foreign sources of energy as our own sources are tapped. The Energy Information Administration of the Department of Energy states that the U.S. peaked in oil production in the 1970’s and we have since exhausted 75% of all the known oil reserves in this country. Furthermore, the U.S. peaked in natural gas production in 1973, and in order to keep gas production steady in the U.S., we have had to drill thousands more wells every year. In sum, we have very little remaining oil and gas reserves. While we do have a considerable supply of coal resources, we do not have the technology to use them without putting a substantial amount of carbon into the atmosphere. With growing concerns over global warming and its far reaching environmental impact, coal is not currently a reasonable option. Furthermore, electricity generation is the largest industrial source of air pollution in the U.S. and forty percent of CO

2 comes from the electric

power sector.1 Among other things, we are going to have to begin to rely more on clean and renewable sources of energy in order to sustain our civilization. Why Wind? Mankind has put wind to work for centuries, yet its large-scale application for electricity generation has only occurred in the past two decades. Wind power can play a large role in the solution to the current energy and environmental crisis. Its non-polluting nature, and its increasing cost effectiveness, the compatibility of wind power with other land uses, and the abundance of the wind resources and all qualify it as a powerful option for meeting future energy needs. Wind power avoids many of the negative effects of traditional electricity generation including, emissions of heavy metals, emissions associated with extracting and

transporting fuels, lake and streambed acidification from acid rain or mining, water consumption associated with mining, production of toxic solid wastes, ash, or slurry, and greenhouse gas emissions. The table to the left indicates the substantial amount of CO2 emissions that could be avoided by generating 20% of our electricity from wind power by 2030.

In addition to lower emissions, wind power is becoming increasingly efficient in terms of material use. One study, conducted in Germany by Gerd Hagedorn, showed that “wind turbines produce 4 to 33 times more energy during their 20-year lifetimes than that used in their construction. Coal plants produce 64 times more energy and nuclear 108 times more than that used in their construction. Current photovoltaic

1 AWEA Facts Sheets


4

technology produces one to three times the energy represented by their materials. When fuel is included, coal and nuclear plants deliver only one-third of the total energy used in their construction and in their fuel supply because fuel consumption dwarfs the amount of energy in the plant’s materials.”2 Furthermore, wind power is now fairly cost effective. The results of three European studies showed that “medium-sized wind turbines installed in areas with commercially usable wind resources will pay for themselves within one year.”3 Moreover, wind power can be a catalyst to the development of rural areas where the best resources are often located. There are several economic development benefits associated with wind projects, including: job creation, local project spending, annual property and sales taxes, and annual landowner easement payments. According to the studies conducted by Wind Powering America in conjunction with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory 40-140 jobs are created during the construction phase for every 100 MW of installed capacity; 6 to 10 new jobs are created during the operations phase for every 100 MW of installed capacity. Additionally, $500,000-$1,000,000 in new annual property tax payments are generated for every 100 MW of installed capacity and annual landowner easement payments are typically $2,000-$5,000 per MW of installed capacity. Although wind power plants have relatively little impact on the environment compared to other conventional power plants, there is some concern over the noise, aesthetic impacts, and bird and bat mortality. Most of these problems have been resolved or greatly reduced through technological development or by properly siting wind plants.

According to the American Wind Energy Association, the total potential amount of wind generated electricity in the United States is more than twice the total amount of electricity generated in the U.S. today, about 10,777 billion kWh annually. The states with the top five wind energy potential are North Dakota, Texas, Kansas, South Dakota, and Montana.

2 Gipe, 422. 3 Gipe, 421.


5

Why Texas? Texas’ size and varied climate makes it the state with the most potential in terms of renewable resources. According to InfinitePower.org, the annual wind power available in Texas is approximately 250,000 MW, almost four times the amount of electricity currently produced in the state. A state law signed in 1999 set a goal to install 2,000 MW of new renewable energy resources by 2009. In 2005, Texas legislators increased it to 5,000 MW by 2015 and to 10,000 MW by 2025. The cost-effectiveness of wind turbines makes them a likely source of approximately 5,000 MW of the renewable goals of the state. In addition, wind farms could play a major role in developing the vast rural areas of Texas many of which are currently experiencing depopulation. As noted above, wind turbines can benefit the economy in rural areas. As the turbines use only a fraction of the land, by being built on farms or ranches the residents can continue to work the land while collecting rent payments from the wind power plant owners.


6

Problem Statement

With the growing necessity to switch to clean, renewable energy sources it is imperative that we identify areas of unmet potential. Its cost effectiveness and the appropriate geography in Texas make wind power a viable choice as a sustainable power source for a large part of the state. Unfortunately, good wind sites are typically in remote locations, far from cities where the electricity demand is high. This project will focus on determining locations in Texas suitable to produce wind power to supply the energy demands of urban areas. An examination of existing conditions and future growth predictions will be used to determine which Texas counties have the greatest possibility as future centers of renewable energy. Research Questions • What are the areas of unmet potential in terms of wind resources? • What are suitable locations for new wind power infrastructure? • What existing urban areas can take greater advantage of wind resources? • What areas may support new developments around the wind power industry?

Methodology

To conduct an analysis on the suitability of wind power for Texas urban areas I first researched the qualities that were both positive factors and negative factors in siting wind farms. The involved a thorough review of literature produced by both government and private organizations. As the basis of my analysis I used the criteria put forth in a 2001 study by Baban and Parry titled Developing and applying a GIS-assisted approach to locating wind farms in the UK. According to their criteria the Wind farm location must: 1. avoid summits of large hills 2. have slope angles less than 10% 4. have a wind speed greater than 5m/s 5. not be located within 500m of woodland 6. not be located within 2000m of large Settlements 7. not be located within 500m of single dwellings 8. not be located further than 10000m from roads 9. not be located further than 10000m of National Grid 10. not be located within 400m of water bodies 11. not be located within 1000m of areas of ecological value/special scientific interest 12. not be located on or within 1000m of historic sites 13. not be located within 1000m of National Trust property 14. avoid taking grade 1 and grade 2 agricultural land As this was a study for the UK, I converted the distances from meters to miles for my buffers. In addition due to the scale of my research area and the time constraints of the project I was unable to include all of the factors in my analysis. The factors not included in my study were numbers 1, 7, 12, 13, 14. For factor 9 I used large utility lines and for factor 11 I used state and national parks. Secondly, to determine the future energy needs in Texas I sought information on the current and future population size to determine areas of increasing demand. I acquired the population projections from the Texas State Data Center and Office of the Demogapher (TSDC). The projections are of the population all counties in the


7

State for each year from 2000 through 2040. The projections were completed using a cohort-component projection technique. Data Acquisition The majority of the data used in this analysis came from the Texas General Land Office. I large portion of the data was available to download from their website. For the purposes of my analysis I acquired the following files: city limits, counties, major water, national parks, state parks, urban areas, and vegetation. In addition to these freely available files I contacted GIS Analyst, Jon Painter for the shape file containing the locations of current Texas wind farms. For the wind power data I relied on two sources. First, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has low resolution wind data for the entire country and high resolution data for some states. Unfortunately, Texas is not one of those states. Therefore, I used the NREL data on the context map showing the continental US only. The more detailed wind energy for the state of Texas only was retrieved from the Alternative Energy Institute at West Texas A&M University through contact with Director Kenneth Starcher. For the slope of the topography I acquired two raster images from the Berkeley/Penn Urban and Environmental Modeler’s Datakit for the west and south regions that divide Texas. Lastly, I downloaded files for statewide Texas roads and utility lines from The GeoCommunity website. Data Preparation For the purposes of my analysis all files were projected to the NAD 1983 Texas Centric Mapping System Lambert. To make the population projection data usable, the excel file was modified and edited so that it only included the total population for the years 2000, 2020, and 2040 for each county. This file was then joined to the counties shape file using the county name as the common field. The raster images containing the slope information we too detailed and included an area large than my study zone. In addition the state of Texas was divided between the two files. I began by performing a raster calculation to differentiate only between slopes less than or equal to 10% and slopes greater than 10%. Then I converted the two simplified raster images to polygons. I merged the polygons and clipped the resultant shape to the Texas state border. Maps

The Case for Texas • Create a data frame named “U.S. distribution” containing national wind data symbolize by the wind power class

• Create a data frame named “Texas Distribution” • Copy the wind data layer and symbology from the U.S. distribution frame


8

Resources and Demand • Create a data frame named “Adequate Wind Supply” • Add the K2final.rst showing Texas wind classes from the Alternative Energy Institute symbolized by wind power class, remove values 1 and 2 as they are too low for commercial use

• Add current wind farm locations • Create a data frame named “2000 Demand” • Add counties layer, symbolize by 2000 total population • Add urban areas • Add current wind farm locations Suitable Sites: Favorable Conditions • Create a data frame named “adequate wind” with values 3-7 extracted from Texas wind data symbolized by wind class

• Create a data frame named “percentage slope” with topography layer symbolized by percent slope less and greater than 10%

• Create a data frame named “proximity to roads” with the roads layer • Create a buffer from roads of five miles • Create a data frame named “proximity to utility lines” with the utility lines layer • Create a buffer from utility lines of five miles Suitable Sites: Favorable Locations • Create a data frame named “favorable locations” with extracted areas with slope less than 10%

• Clip low slope layer using good wind, roads buffer, and utility lines buffer, name the resultant file favorable locations

Suitable Sites: Constraints • Create a data frame named “urban areas” with the urban_areas layer • Create a buffer from urban_areas of 1-1/4 miles- dissolve all to create one polygon

• Create a data frame named “forested area” with extract areas classified as forests from the veg layer

• Create a buffer from forests of ¼ mile- dissolve all to create one polygon • Create a data frame named “major water features” with the lakes_rivers layer • Create a buffer from lakes_rivers of 1/2 mile- dissolve all to create one polygon • Create a data frame named “protected landscapes” the state and national parks layer

• Create a buffer from the parks of 1/2 mile- dissolve all to create one polygon Suitable Sites: Constrained Locations • Create a data frame named “constrained locations” • Merge the four buffers: urban, forest, water, and parks into one layer named constrained locations

Suitable Sites: • Create a data frame named “unfavorable locations” • Erase constrained locations from favorable sites, name resultant layer suitable sites

Future Demand: Projected Population Growth • Create a data frame named “population growth 2000-2020” • Add counties data layer and edited 2006allcntymigtot.xls table


9

• Join table to the counties layer using county names • Add a new field 2020_2000 and calculate values based on population 2020- population 2000

• Symbolize population based on this new field using seven categories • Repeat for population growth 2000-2040 • Adjust the breaks of the categories in the two data frames to be consistent

Potential Impact: Areas of New Growth • Create a new data frame named New Growth • Add the suitable areas layer • Add cities layer, label features

Suitable Sites: Population Factors • Create a data frame “locating by future demand” • Add counties layer with extracted areas with a change in population from 2000-

2040 of over 100,000 • Buffer this new layer by 200 miles, and clip to the Texas state border, Clip

suitable locations using the 200 mile buffer • Create a data frame “locating by industry need” • Add counties layer with extracted areas with a change in population from 2000-

2040 less than 0 • Clip suitable locations using the to counties with negative growth, name the

resultant layer by industry need Suitable Sites: Prime Locations • Add the by demand layer and by industry need layer • Clip demand by industry need, name the resultant layer prime locations • Select the counties that include this new layer • Label selected counties

Findings

Reference: Resources and Demand Determining Suitable Sites: Favorable Conditions Favorable Locations Constraints Constrained Locations Suitable Sites

Future Demand: Areas of New Growth Projected Population Growth Determining Prime Locations: Population Factors Prime Locations


19

Analysis

Through mapping the existing resources it is evident that Texas has a large quantity of wind resources they are predominately located in the northwestern portion of the state an along the coast. Furthermore, the main centers of demand tend to be located along a band that runs north to south through the central portion of the state. The discrepancy between locations of supply and demand will make transmission a key issue in the development of wind power in Texas. While there are already a fair number of wind farms in Texas, they are not all located in the regions with the greatest wind resources and there is still plenty of potential for future growth. The analysis of favorable conditions for siting the wind farms reveals that wind resources are the largest limiting factor. In terms of landscape, the majority of Texas is well suited for wind power as the vast majority of the state has less than 10% slope. In terms of infrastructure, aging the majority of the state is within range of existing roads and utility lines. Furthermore, research revealed that the existing transmission infrastructure will not be able to handle the addition of substantial new power sources and it is likely new infrastructure will be needed no matter the location. However, these factors were still used to limit the scope of this study. The analysis of constraining conditions shows that the location of major water features may be the largest constraining factor. The majority of other factors: forested areas, urban areas, and protected landscapes had the greatest concentration in the middle, and eastern portions of the state. This is true of the water features as well, yet there seemed still be a significant amount in the northwestern portion. The population analysis of Texas revealed that it is predicted to experience depopulation in the rural areas and a densification in the cities. This will have two effects on locating potential wind farms. First, the cities will be experiencing the greatest amount of demand increase. This means that facilities located nearer to the cities will be preferable because they will experience less loss in transmission. Secondly, the rural areas are in need of new industry to maintain and increase their population levels. Counties projected to experience negative growth in the next forty years are good candidates for wind farms or wind power manufacturing facilities and their associated economic benefits. An overlay of these two factors revealed 13 counties in Texas that are both expected to decrease in population by 2040 and are within 200 miles of a county expected to grow by over 100,000 people by 2040. These findings are the result of the population projection used in this study. Updated projections using future census information or projections using a different model may yield different results. The findings support the initial hypothesis that Texas has a lot of potential sites that are adequate for wind power facilities as well as growing power needs. However, it appears that natural and existing man made conditions should not be the main determining factor in selected sites for new wind farms. Rather, changes in future population will have the greatest effect on the location demand and industry need.


20

Conclusion

The biggest challenge to implementing wind power for Texas is the discrepancy between the location of supply and demand. Developing new infrastructure for transmission will necessary to achieve the full potential of the resource. The boundary for this study was the state of Texas only. However, the new transmission technology makes long distance transmission feasible. This means that if the infrastructure can be created Texas could supply energy to surrounding states with lesser wind resources. Based on this study the thirteen identified counties: Hardeman, Foard, Baylor, Callahan, Motley, Dickens, Kent, Fisher, Coke, Jeff Davis, Refugio, San Patricio, Aransas are the prime locations for wind farms by the presence of favorable sites without constrains, their need for industry and their proximity to growing counties. These counties should conduct further analysis at the local level to determine land availability and local interest. The constraints used in this study are by no means exhaustive. Additional analysis may exclude sites shown in this study to be acceptable or favorable. Furthermore, this study was conducted at the state level to determine which counties had the highest potential. Further studies should be conducted at a finer resolution for the actual siting of wind farms. A certain distance from roads and residences should be maintained to decrease the potential problems associated with noise, shadow flicker from the sun crossing the blades and low frequency vibrations. In addition, local ecosystems and animal habitats should be taken into consideration when selecting the site.


21

References

Baban S.M.J. and Parry T. Developing and applying a GIS-assisted approach to locatingwind farms in the UK. Renewal Energy.2001. Gipe, Paul. Wind Energy Comes of Age. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1995. National Research Council. Environmental Impacts of Wind Power Projects. The National Academies Press. Pasqualetti, Martin, Paul Gipe and Robert Righter. Wind Power in View Energy Landscapes in a Crowded World. San Diego, California: Academic Press, 2002. “The Infinite Power of Texas.” InfinitePower.org. The State Energy Conservation Office <www.InfinitePower.org> “Wind and Hydro Power Technologies.” Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. U.S. Department of Energy. <http://www1.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/> “Wind Energy Facts Sheets”. American Wind Energy Association. <http://www.awea.org/pubs/factsheets.html> Wizelius, Tore. Developing Wind Power Projects. London: Earthscan Publications, 2006. 20% Wind Scenario: Wind Energy Provides 20% of U.S. Electricity Needs by 2030. Department of Energy, July 2008. <http://www1.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/pdfs/41869.pdf>

http://www.infinitepower.org/

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/

http://www.awea.org/pubs/factsheets.html


22

APPENDIX


23

Data Acquisition

Texas General Land Office (TGLO) Website: http://www.glo.state.tx.us/gisdata/gisdata.html Contact: Jon Painter, GIS Analyst: (512)463-7768 [email protected] Disclaimers for data: “Some areas may, with improved data, may turn out to be windier than indicated, while others may be worse. The data simply identifies promising regions in which to focus future assessment activities and development. True potential of a specific site can only be determined from long-term quality measurements. Wind farm locations are in the approximate location in the county. The Texas General Land Office makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information depicted on this map or the data from which it was produced. This map IS NOT suitable for navigational purposes and does not purport to depict or establish boundaries between private and public land.” Data Files: citylimits.shp, counties.shp, major_water.shp, natparks.shp, roads.shp, stateparks.shp, subblocks.shp, urban_areas.shp, veg.shp Berkeley/Penn Urban and Environmental Modeler’s Datakit (EMD) Website: http://www.dcrp.ced.berkeley.edu/research/footprint/ Data Files: DEM slope south, DEM slope west National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Website: http://www.nrel.gov/gis/data_analysis.html Data File: l48wndatlas.shp Texas State Data Center and Office of the Demogapher (TSDC) Website: http://txsdc.utsa.edu/tpepp/2006projections/ Data Files: 2006allcntymigtot.xls Alternative Energy Institute: West Texas A&M University (AEI) Website: http://www.windenergy.org/datasites/template.html Contact: Kenneth Starcher, Director: (806)651-2295 [email protected] Data Files: K2final.rst The GeoCommunity Website: http://www.geocomm.com/ Data Files: rdline.e00, utline.e00 Expanded Methodology

Re-project all layers to NAD 1983 Texas Centric Mapping System Lambert The Case for Texas • Create a data frame named “U.S. distribution” • Add the l48wndatlas.shp file containing national wind data • Symbolize with the wind power class • Add the Texas counties layer • Dissolve counties into a Texas state outline • Symbolize as hollow with white outline • Create a data frame named “Texas Distribution” • Copy the wind data layer and symbology from the U.S. distribution frame

http://www.glo.state.tx.us/gisdata/gisdata.html

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.dcrp.ced.berkeley.edu/research/footprint/

http://www.nrel.gov/gis/data_analysis.html

http://txsdc.utsa.edu/tpepp/2006projections/

http://www.windenergy.org/datasites/template.html

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.geocomm.com/


24

• Copy the Texas outline layer Clip wind layer with the Texas outline layer Add the counties layer and symbolize as hollow with white borders

Resources and Demand • Create a data frame named “Adequate Wind Supply” • Add the K2final.rst showing Texas wind classes from the Alternative Energy

Institute • Symbolize by wind power class, remove values 1 and 2 as they are too low for

commercial use • Add counties layer, symbolize as grey with white borders • Add wind farms file • Create new symbol from windmill bitmap image • Use new symbol to represent wind farm locations • Create a data frame named “2000 Demand” • Add counties layer, symbolize by 2000 total population • Add urban areas • Add current wind farm locations

Suitable Sites: Favorable Conditions • Create a data frame named “adequate wind” • Add the K2final.rst showing Texas wind classes from the AEI • Convert raster to polygon “wind class” • Select values 3-7 and extract as a separate shape file “good wind” • Symbolize by wind class • Remove raster and wind class polygon • Create a data frame named “percentage slope” • Add the topography layer • Symbolize by gridcode, percent slope less and greater than 10% • Create a data frame named “proximity to roads” • Add the roads layer • Create a buffer from roads of five miles- dissolve all to create one polygon • Create a data frame named “proximity to utility lines” • Add the utility lines layer • Create a buffer from utility lines of five miles- dissolve all to create one polygon

Suitable Sites: Favorable Locations • Create a data frame named “favorable locations” • Add topography layer • Extract areas with slope less than 10%, save as low slope • Remove topography layer • Add good wind layer • Add roads buffer layer • Add utility lines buffer layer • Clip low slope layer using good wind, roads buffer, and utility lines buffer, name

the resultant file favorable locations • Remove low slope, good wind, roads buffer, and utility lines buffer • Add counties layer, symbolize as grey with white borders

Suitable Sites: Constraints • Create a data frame named “urban areas” • Add the urban_areas layer


25

• Create a buffer from urban_areas of 1-1/4 miles- dissolve all to create one polygon

• Create a data frame named “forested area” • Add the veg layer • Extract areas classified as forests- name the new layer forests • Create a buffer from forests of ¼ mile- dissolve all to create one polygon • Create a data frame named “major water features” • Add the lakes_rivers layer • Create a buffer from lakes_rivers of 1/2 mile- dissolve all to create one polygon • Create a data frame named “protected landscapes” • Add the st_parks layer • Create a buffer from st_parks of 1/2 mile- dissolve all to create one polygon • Add the nat_parks layer • Create a buffer from nat_ parks of 1/2 mile- dissolve all to create one polygon

Suitable Sites: Constrained Locations • Create a data frame named “constrained locations” • Add urban areas buffer • Add forest buffer • Add water buffer • Add parks buffer • Merge the four buffers into one layer named constrained locations • Remove individual buffers • Add counties layer, symbolize as grey with white borders

Suitable Sites: • Create a data frame named “unfavorable locations” • Add favorable locations • Add constrained locations • Erase constrained locations from favorable sites, name resultant layer suitable

sites • Remove favorable and constrained locations

Future Demand: Projected Population Growth • Create a data frame named “population growth 2000-2020” • Add counties data layer • Open 2006allcntymigtot.xls in excel and format to show county name, population

in 2000, population in 2020, and population in 2040 in four columns • Add edited 2006allcntymigtot.xls table to data frame • Join table to the counties layer using county names • Add a new field 2020_2000 and calculate values based on population 2020-

population 2000 • Symbolize population based on this new field using seven categories • Create a data frame named “population growth 2000-2040” • Copy counties layer • Add a new field 2040_2000 and calculate values based on population 2070-

population 2000 • Symbolize population based on this new field using seven categories • Adjust the breaks of the categories in the two data frames to be consistent

Suitable Sites: Population Factors • Create a data frame “locating by future demand” • Add counties layer


26

• Extract all areas with a change in population from 2000-2040 of over 100,000 • Buffer this new layer by 200 miles • Clip the buffer to the Texas state border, name the resultant layer by demand • Add suitable locations • Clip suitable locations using the 200 mile buffer • Create a data frame “locating by industry need” • Add counties layer • Extract all areas with a change in population from 2000-2040 less than 0 • Add suitable locations • Clip suitable locations using the to counties with negative growth, name the

resultant layer by industry need Suitable Sites: Prime Locations • Add the by demand layer and by industry need layer • Clip demand by industry need, name the resultant layer prime locations • Select the counties that include this new layer • Label selected counties

Potential Impact: Areas of New Growth • Create a new data frame named New Growth • Add the suitable areas layer • Add cities layer, label features

Suitability of Wind Power - Texas Architecturethe analysis on the suitability of wind power for...

Documents

Transcript of Suitability of Wind Power - Texas Architecturethe analysis on the suitability of wind power for...