Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

20
Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex

Transcript of Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Page 1: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES

John Ermisch

University of Essex

Page 2: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

The Women and Employment Survey

WES provided the first comprehensive birth and marriage histories for a nationally representative sample of women.

Can be used in conjunction with subsequent data to examine how family dynamics have changed across cohorts.

Example: dynamics of non-marital childbearing.

Page 3: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

The WES history data

Retrospective histories from 1980 X-section Start and end dates for marriages Dates of birth No cohabiting union dates Employment history data:

– Dates of full-time, part-time and non-employment spells.

Page 4: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Post-1980 nationally representative data

British Household Panel Study (BHPS) retrospective histories

Cohabiting unions, marriages and births Updated with information during the panel,

1993-2003 Also employment and job histories

Page 5: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Example: Dynamics of Non-marital Childbearing

Aggregate characterisation: Proportion of births outside marriage

stability 1845-1965 (4-7%) followed by explosion, particularly after 1980 42% in 2004.

Birth rates vs. Size of non-married population Rise in age-specific rates 1975-90 Rise in proportion not married 1970-2004

Page 6: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Births Outside Marriage per 1000 births

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

1845 1855 1865 1875 1885 1895 1905 1915 1925 1935 1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995

Year

Page 7: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Birth rate Outside Marriage, per 1000 unmarried women

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02

Year

Aged 15-19

Aged 20-24

Aged 25-29

Aged 30-34

Page 8: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Proportion of women not married

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02

Year

Aged 15-19

Aged 20-24

Aged 25-29

Aged 30-34

Page 9: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Social Interaction Theory

An individual’s behaviour may depend on what others in society are perceived to be doing—’social influence’.

E.g. there may be social stigma associated with non-marital births when they are rare.

Gives rise to ‘multiplier effects’ or ‘multiple equilibria’.

Page 10: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Who has a birth before marriage?

Costs of non-marital birth in terms of labour and marriage market opportunities lost are smaller for women with ‘poorer prospects’ in these markets

E.g. women with less education. Expect women with ‘poorer prospects’ to be

more likely to have a birth before marriage.

Page 11: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Social interaction and differentials

If reference group for ‘social influence’ is people of a ‘similar background’, then differences in birth rates by education levels would be larger when non-marital childbearing is more common.

If reference group for ‘social influence’ is wider population, then educational differentials would be smaller when non-marital births are more common.

Page 12: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Equilibrium Proportions becoming a Single Mother

Expected Proportion

Actual Proportion

Page 13: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Birth Cohort comparison

1944-60, from WES (N=2,555 women)– ‘Stability cohorts’

1960-83, from BHPS (N=5,821 women)– ‘Post-explosion cohorts’

Event history analysis of non-marital first birth: censored at first marriage or at time of last survey.

Page 14: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Age Pattern of Non-marital First Birth Rate

1944-60: Peaks at age 20 and then declines. Level at peak: about 1% per year.

1960-83: Initial peak at age 20 and remains relatively high

until age 30, after which it declines. Level at peak: about 3% per year.

Page 15: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Association with Educational Attainment

Non-marital birth rate relative to rate for women staying in full-time education longer:

1944-60 cohort, left school before 16 (39%): Relative Risk (RR) =1.9

1960-83 cohort: left school before or at 16 (54%): RR=4.2

Supports ‘local social influence’.

Page 16: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Relative risk of non-marital birth for women leaving education ‘early’, by birth cohort

00.5

11.5

2

2.53

3.54

4.5

1944-60 1960-83

Page 17: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

First Births outside partnerships

1960-83 cohort Age pattern

Initial peak at age 20 and remains relatively high until age 25, after which it declines.

Level at peak: about 2.5% per year. Non-partnership birth rate relative to rate for

women staying in full-time education longer:

Left school before or at 16: RR=4.3

Page 18: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

First Births within cohabiting unions

1960-83 cohort Union duration pattern

Peaks in first year and declines. Level at peak: about 10% per year.

Cohabiting union birth rate relative to staying in full-time education longer:

Left school before or at 16: RR=2.8

Page 19: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Dynamics of First Marriage

1944-60: First marriage rate peaks at age 23 and then

declines. Median age at marriage about 22.5 (ONS: 22-23).

1960-83: First marriage rate peaks at 29. Median age at marriage about 32 (ONS: 24, 1962

Cohort; 29, 1971 Cohort). Age distribution has wider spread.

Page 20: Studying the History of Family Dynamics: the role of the WES John Ermisch University of Essex.

Conclusions

WES provides historical information on the dynamics of marriage and births

Allows us to study how dynamics and ‘group differences’ have changed over time

May provide some insight into the presence of ‘social interaction’ effects

Illustrated with example of non-marital childbearing, which has exploded in recent years