Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic...
-
Upload
ashlee-townsend -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic...
![Page 1: Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic situations and different operating conditions” Date Nov.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051216/5697bf721a28abf838c7e622/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Study
“Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian
in different traffic situations and different operating conditions”
Date Nov. 2014
![Page 2: Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic situations and different operating conditions” Date Nov.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051216/5697bf721a28abf838c7e622/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Vehicle exterior noise different traffic situations /operating conditions
Based on the performance measurement of ICEV- noise, possible perception deficits of EV-/ HEV-noise should be shown
1. Pre Coming vehicleVehicles:
14 ICEV (8 Petrol/6 Diesel)4 EV2 HEV1 EV Synthetic Sound
at 3 traffic-situations:
![Page 3: Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic situations and different operating conditions” Date Nov.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051216/5697bf721a28abf838c7e622/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Vehicle exterior noise different traffic situations
2. Approaching vehicle parking lot
3. Slowing vehicle Cross-walk
49 dB(A)
Very Quiet Quiet
52 dB(A)
62 dB(A)
Very NoisyNoisy
60 dB(A)
/ operating conditions
![Page 4: Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic situations and different operating conditions” Date Nov.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051216/5697bf721a28abf838c7e622/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Starting Speed: 0 km/hICEVEVHEVSynthetic
Vehicle recognized
Position Dummy- Head Microphon
Backround Noise:Very Quiet / Quiet / Loud / Very Loud
Recognition time
1. Pre Coming vehicle
![Page 5: Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic situations and different operating conditions” Date Nov.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051216/5697bf721a28abf838c7e622/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Reco
gniti
on ti
me
(s)
• Backround Noise: Very Quiet (49 dB(A))
EV / HEV Speed at micro 30 km/hICEV Speed at micro 50 km/h EV Sound
1. Pre Coming vehicle
![Page 6: Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic situations and different operating conditions” Date Nov.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051216/5697bf721a28abf838c7e622/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Backround Noise: Noisy (60 dB(A))
EV / HEV Speed at micro 30 km/h
Reco
gniti
on ti
me
(s)
EV SoundICEV Speed at micro 50 km/h
1. Pre Coming vehicle
![Page 7: Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic situations and different operating conditions” Date Nov.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051216/5697bf721a28abf838c7e622/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Backround : Quiet and Noisy
Reco
gniti
on ti
me
(s)
Biggest differences of Recognition-time
between Quiet (52 dB(A) and Noisy (60 dB(A)) !
Only this 2 cases will shown
No Corelation between Recognition time and
Recognition SPL !
Examples … Reco
gniti
on ti
me
(s)
Recognition SPL
1. Pre Coming vehicle
![Page 8: Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic situations and different operating conditions” Date Nov.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051216/5697bf721a28abf838c7e622/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Audi Q5 (HEV no AVAS) 30 km/h at microRecognition time: 4,1 sec.Backround overall SPL: 57 dB(A)Vehicle overall SPL: 52,4 dB(A)1/3 Oct.: No level higher than Backround !
Mits. IMev (EV no AVAS) 30 km/h at microRecognition time: 4,2 sec.Backround overall SPL: 57 dB(A)Vehicle overall SPL: 61,5 dB(A)1/3 Oct.: above 200 Hz each level higher than Backround Noise !
Recognition time: 1,4 sec.Backround overall SPL: 57 dB(A)Vehicle overall SPL: 52,7 dB(A)1/3 Oct.: Between 100 & 500 Hz levels higher than Backround Noise!
Matiz (EV with AVAS) 30 km/h at micro
1. Pre Coming vehicle
![Page 9: Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic situations and different operating conditions” Date Nov.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051216/5697bf721a28abf838c7e622/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
2. Approaching vehicle
1. ICEV starting from idle (Diesel) „V-LL“2. ICEV after engine start (Diesel) „V-MS“3. EV without Sound „E-FZ“
5 different sounds:
4. EV Synth. Starting- & Idling-Sound „Syn-LL“
5. EV Synth. Starting- & NO Iddling-Sound „Syn“
„Idling“
Sound 4 „Syn LL“ Sound 5 „Syn“
![Page 10: Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic situations and different operating conditions” Date Nov.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051216/5697bf721a28abf838c7e622/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Vehicle exterior noise …Re
cogn
ition
tim
e (s
)
Overall AverageWithout distraction (backraound quiet)Without distraction (backraound noisy)With distraction (backraound quiet)With distraction (backraound noisy)
NoiseIdling Diesel
Starting Diesel
Reco
gniti
on ti
me
(s)
Overall AverageNot Visually impairedVisually impaired
Results: TimeOnly Small difference between ICE (0,82 s / 1,02 s) and Syn/Syn-LL (1,3 s)
Results : Distance
ICEV
EV (no Sound)
Conclusion: - Synthetic sound is needed- Stationary sound is not needed (with Syn-LL localisation not so easy)
Syn = Syn-LL1,3s
Standard deviation ICE smaller than Syn / Syn-LL
Nearly no difference between Syn-LL (1,24 s) and / Syn (1,31 s)
![Page 11: Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic situations and different operating conditions” Date Nov.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051216/5697bf721a28abf838c7e622/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Vehicle exterior noise …3. Slowing vehicle Cross-walk
1. ICEV stopped with idle (Diesel) „V-LL“2. ICEV stopped without idle (Start/Stop Diesel) „V-MS“3. EV stopped without Sound „E-FZ“
5 different sounds:
4. EV Synth. stopped with idle-Sound „Syn-LL“
5. EV Synth. stopped without idle-Sound „Syn“Synthetic with idle-sound
Synthetic with-out idle-sound
EV without deccelaration-sound causes risks (big deviation)
Nearly no difference between Diesel with/without Start/Stop
Conclusion: Stationary sound gives no advantage in recognition of EV/HEV
Results:
Not heard anymoreWaiting for change
Nearly no difference between Syn-LL (+0,6 s) & Syn (+0,55 s)
![Page 12: Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic situations and different operating conditions” Date Nov.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051216/5697bf721a28abf838c7e622/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Vehicle brakes?Vehicle accelerates?
Vehicle exterior noise …Operation Status: acceleration – braking?
Best recognition with fewest failures ?
Sound sweeps (2 s) with Frequency alteration rateof 10%, 20%, 40%, 80%, 160% and 320% with and without backround noise of 55 dB(A)
without backround noise brakingwith backround noise braking
without backround noise accelerationwith backround noise acceleration
Frequency between 250 Hz and 400 Hz = 80% freqeuncy alteration
![Page 13: Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic situations and different operating conditions” Date Nov.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051216/5697bf721a28abf838c7e622/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Vehicle exterior noise …Study Conclusions:
Additional Sound is needed for detection of pre comming / approching EVs/HEVs
Only a few individual bands of 1/3-octave have to be higher than backround noise bands
Frequencies should be simular to deep-frequent ICE signals
There is no correlation between recognition time and sound level
Approaching (parking lot) & slowing (cross-walk) of EV/HEV without sound can‘t be recognised (early enough)
Stationary Sound isn‘t necessary for Approaching (parking lot) & slowing (cross-walk) of EV/HEV
Facceleration and braking should be shown by freqeuncy alteration between 250 - 400 Hz
![Page 14: Study “Perception and evaluation of Vehicle exterior noise by pedestrian in different traffic situations and different operating conditions” Date Nov.](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051216/5697bf721a28abf838c7e622/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Thank you
Vehicle exterior noise different traffic situations /operating conditions