STUDY on The PRoVISIon of InTeRnATIonAL ASSISTAnCe AnD...
Transcript of STUDY on The PRoVISIon of InTeRnATIonAL ASSISTAnCe AnD...
Civil Protection and Disaster Management
STUDY on The PRoVISIon of InTeRnATIonAL ASSISTAnCe AnD hoST nATIon SUPPoRT
EU funded Programme
Developed by EU-funded Programme for the Prevention, Preparedness and Responseto Man-made and Natural Disasters in the ENPI East Region (PPRD East)
EEU-funded pr
rogramme fo
STINTE
or the Preven
TUDYERNAT
HOST
ntion, PreparENPI Ea
Y on thTIONAT NAT
redness andast Region (P
he PRAL ASTION
Response toPPRD East)
ROVISSSISTASUPP
o natural and
SION oANCEPORT
d man-made
of E and
e disasters in
the
Developed by EU-funded Programme for the Prevention, Preparedness and Response to Man-made and Natural Disasters in the ENPI East Region (PPRD East
1 PREFACE
The Study on the Provision of International Assistance and Host Nation Support (hereinafter the Study) presented hereby was undertaken within the scope of the Programme on Prevention, Preparedness and Response to man-made and natural Disasters in the ENPI East Region (PPRD East), running as part of the Eastern Partnership Flagship Initiatives between 2010 and 2014 and financed by the European Union.
The overall objective of the Programme is to contribute to the peace, stability, security and prosperity of the Eastern Partner Countries1 and to protect the environment, the population, the cultural heritage, the resources and the infrastructure of the region by strengthening the Partner Countries’ resilience, prevention, preparedness and response to natural and man-made disasters.
This Study is considered as an analysis of the existing status of the legislation and structures of the Partner Countries relevant to the provision of international assistance and host nation support, as well as an input for the eventual development of regional guidelines on cross-border movement of disaster relief assistance including expert teams, equipment and in-kind assistance.
The terminology used, the interpretations, findings and conclusions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission.
The Study has the following structure, including annexes:
Chapter 1: Preface Chapter 2: Abbreviations and acronyms Chapter 3: Glossary of terms Chapter 4: Executive summary Chapter 5 Methodology Chapter 6: HNS in the Partner Countries Chapter 7: General conclusions
Annex I: Online questionnaire summary Annex II: HNS guidelines per Beneficiary country Annex III: Acknowledgements
This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the PPRD East Team and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
1 Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine
TABLE O
1 PRE
2 ABB
3 GLO
4 EXE
5 MET
5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4
6 HNS
6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6
7 GEN
8 ANN
9 ANN
10 ANN
Develo
OF CONTE
EFACE .........
BREVIATION
OSSARY OF T
CUTIVE SUM
THODOLOG
UNDERLYINGLIMITATIONSWHAT GUIDTHE RESEAR
S IN THE PA
ARMENIA ...AZERBAIJANBELARUS ....GEORGIA ...MOLDOVA .UKRAINE ....
NERAL CONC
NEX I – QUE
NEX II – HNS
NEX III – AC
oped by EU-fundean
ENT
..................
NS AND ACR
TERMS ......
MMARY ....
GY ..............
G ASSUMPTIOS ................
DELINES? .......CH ..............
ARTNER COU
..................N .................
..................
..................
..................
..................
CLUSIONS .
ESTIONNAIR
S GUIDELIN
CKNOWLEDG
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
..................
RONYMS ...
..................
..................
..................
NS ....................................................................
UNTRIES ....
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
RE SUMMA
NES PER PAR
GEMENTS ..
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
...................
...................
...................
...................
..................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
..................
ARY ............
RTNER COU
..................
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
...................
...................
...................
...................
..................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
..................
..................
UNTRY ........
..................
Response to Manast)
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
...................
...................
...................
...................
..................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
..................
..................
..................
..................
n-made
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
..................
..................
..................
..................
.................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
..................
.................
.................
.................
.................
3
............ 2
............ 4
............ 5
............ 6
............ 8
............. 8
............. 9
........... 10
........... 13
.......... 15
........... 15
........... 22
........... 22
........... 26
........... 33
........... 41
.......... 48
.......... 50
.......... 56
.......... 58
4
2 AB
BSEC
CIS
CPM
EADRCC
ECHO
EMD
ERCC
EU
ENPI
GUUAM
HNS
HQ
IDRL
ICT
IFRC
INSARAG
MCDA
MIRA
MoU
NATO
NGO
OCHA
OSOCC
POC
PS(s)
SCPES
SOP(s)
TOR
USAR
Develo
BBREVIATI
Black See
Commonw
Union Civi
Euro-Atlan
European
Emergenc
Emergenc
European
European
The GUUA
Host Natio
Headquart
Internatio
Informatio
Internatio
Internatio
Military an
Multi-Clus
Memoran
North Atla
Non-gover
(United Na
On-site Op
Point of co
Participati
Service of
Standard O
Terms of R
Urban Sea
oped by EU-fundean
IONS AND
Economic Co
wealth of Ind
l Protection
ntic Disaster
Commission
y Manageme
y Response C
Union
Neighbourh
AM Group, in
on Support
ters
nal Disaster
on and Comm
nal Federatio
nal Search a
nd civil defen
ster/Sector In
dum of Unde
antic Treaty O
rnmental org
ations) Office
perations Co
ontact
ing State(s) o
Civil Protect
Operating Pr
Reference
arch and Resc
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
D ACRONY
ooperation
dependent St
Mechanism
Response an
n (Directorate
ent Departm
Coordination
ood and Par
ncluding Geo
Response La
munication T
on of the Re
nd Rescue A
nce assets
nitial Rapid A
erstanding
Organization
ganization
e for the Coo
ordination C
of the Europe
tion and Eme
rocedure(s)
cue
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
YMS
tates
nd Coordinat
e General) H
ment, Ministr
n Centre of t
rtnership Inst
orgia, Ukraine
aw (within IF
Technology
d Cross and
Advisory Grou
Assessment c
n
ordination of
Centre
ean Civil Pro
ergency Situa
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
tion Centre
Humanitarian
ry of Interior
he European
trument
e, Uzbekistan
FRC)
Red Crescen
up
concept in A
f Humanitari
tection Mec
ations, Minis
Response to Manast)
n Aid and Civ
of Georgia
n Commissio
n, Azerbaijan
nt Societies
rmenia
ian Affairs
hanism
stry of Interio
n-made
vil Protection
on
n and Moldo
or, Moldova
n
ova
3 GL
Differenton the coand actodifferent
So as to defined iacceptedwork.
Assisting s
Civil prote
Civil prote
Common awarenes
Damage a
Donor cou
Eligible in
Gap analy
Host natio
Host natio
Develo
LOSSARY O
t HNS-relateontext they ors have dift terms for t
avoid confin the follo
d interpreta
state
ection assista
ection actors
situational ss
assessment
untries / age
ternational a
ysis
on
on support
oped by EU-fundean
OF TERMS
ed guidelinare produc
fferent meathe same m
fusion or mowing table.ation of the
A ki
ance Emasgoasit
s En
A emin
Evto
encies Cth
actors Inasby
Evid
Thfow
Pre
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
S
es and recoced in or whaning of th
meaning.
misundersta. Since thes
ese terms, t
state offeriind assistanc
mergency assets, but overnment ssistance andhas been of
ntities and in
complete anmergency by
nformation m
valuation of o properties,
ountries / aghe conseque
nternational ssistance, why the host na
valuation ofdentified
he state thatoreign interv
with the cons
rovision of femove as m
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
ommendatiho their usee same ter
anding, the se definitiothey shall so
ing and provce, expert tea
aid, includinno direct
to another d irrespectivffered / deliv
ntervention t
nd unanimouy all respons
management
the disaster, facilities an
gencies that nces of the d
(i.e. not oho are considation or tran
f resources
t receives invention teamequences of
facilities renduch as poss
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
ions use dife is intendedrm, based o
terminologns might nolely be un
viding civil pams and serv
g interventfinancial aone, based
ve of the coovered.
teams provid
us understansible actors (t)
r situation, sd infrastruct
give financiadisaster
of the hostdered eligibl
nsit country
generally av
ternational dms and in-kif a disaster
dered by theible any fore
Response to Manast)
fferent termd for. Also, don their sco
gy used in ot correspoderstood in
rotection asvices
ion teams, assistance,
d on a requordination str
ding civil pro
nding of all ei.e. proper a
pecifically asture
al aid / direc
t nation) ace to receive
vailable agai
disaster relieind assistanc
e host nationeseeable obs
n-made
minology, ddifferent inope of wor
this Study ond to the n the conte
ssistance, inc
services anprovided f
uest for intructure thro
otection assis
effects of theassessment a
s regards the
ct funding to
ctors providthe facilities
inst the all-
ef assistancece / materia
n or transit cstacle to int
5
epending stitutions
rk, or use
is clearly generally
ext of this
cluding in-
nd in-kind from one ternational ugh which
stance
e disaster / and proper
e damages
o eliminate
ding relief s rendered
-time risks
, including al to cope
country to ternational
6
HNS Team
Humanita
Humanita
In-kind as
Mechanis
Needs ass
Participat
Partner C
Risk asses
Transit co
4 EX
When a cthe affecprovide aemergen
Lessons lcan be e
Develo
m / Cell
arian actors
arian aid
ssistance
sm
sessment
ting States
ountries / Pa
ssment
ountry
XECUTIVE S
call goes oucted populaassistance.
ncy assistan
learned froenhanced n
oped by EU-fundean
do
A beasad
N
Dphfr
Dd
U
Evpo
StMYu
artners CA
Thhadfrvu
A re
SUMMAR
ut for help ation and oNot many cce can be to
m past emenot only by
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
isaster relieperations pr
team, estabetween thessistance tedequate pro
on-profit en
isaster relierovided direumanitarian rom donor co
onations thairect funding
nion Civil Pro
valuation of opulation aff
tates participMember Stat
ugoslav Repu
ountries, wzerbaijan, Be
he process oarmful conseisrupted ecorom interactulnerable co
state througelief assistan
RY
after a disaon the effoconsider, hoo the overa
ergencies hy strengthe
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
ef assistanceroceed smoo
blished by the host natioeams / consvision of hos
tities provid
ef assistancectly to the actors, in tountries and
at are done g
otection Me
the situatiofected
pating in thetes, plus Iceublic of Mac
who benefit elarus, Georg
of determiniequences – c
onomic activitions betwenditions.
gh whose tence
aster, the atorts the intowever, holl success o
ave shown ening the r
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
e so as toothly
he host natioon and thesignments, st nation sup
ing humanit
e, includinge (services he majority
d donor agen
in goods an
echanism
n after the d
e European Celand, Lichteedonia)
from this gia, Moldova
ng the naturcasualties, dity and damaeen natural
rritory an as
ttention is ernational w critical thf the opera
that the efresponse ca
Response to Manast)
ensure th
on, that is toincoming f
with the ppport during
arian aid
g materials of) the affof cases witcies
nd services r
disaster to g
Civil Protectioenstein, Nor
ENPI Progra and Ukrain
re and extenamaged pro
age to the enor human-
sisting state
rightly focurelief comm
he preparattion.
ffectivenessapabilities,
n-made
hat disaster
o serve as a foreign disaurpose of fthe operatio
and suppofected poputh the help
rather than
gauge the ne
on Mechanisrway and th
ramme, i.e. e
nt of the prooperty, lost linvironment, -induced ha
transports i
used on themunity is mtions to rec
s of relief obut also b
response
direct link ster relief facilitating ons
ort teams, ulation by of funding
money or
eds of the
sm (i.e. EU he former
Armenia,
obability of ivelihoods, - resulting zards and
ts disaster
needs of making to ceive such
perations by getting
preparedestablishGuidelinehelp govto hinder
The moswhilst bufacilitatioimprove and recenon-bind
Thereforthe Progplanning and strusupport preparedopportunbasis of t
To map within thdecided tquestionapplicablsource, thave fouwas therthe possenhance countriescountriesnot a scrimprove as possibevaluatio
The findi
Asu
Develo
d for receivhed in the mes have beeernments cr smooth re
st recent inuilt on exison of assistsolidarity aive assistan
ding guidelin
re, HNS hasramme, byof the exer
ctures of tand thus co
dness to intnity and seethis work.
the actual he Partner to gather innaire as wle, other cthe questiound it difficrefore decidsibility to i
the unders. In additios and maderutiny exertheir system
ble and it wons.
ngs of the S
All Partner coupport, whi
oped by EU-fundean
ving foreignmilitary, hasen elaborat
consider andelief operati
itiative, thesting interntance operamongst thnce in case ones into acc
s taken promy being intercises. This he Partner ontributes tternational e the poten
situation ocountries
nformation well as froompilationsnnaire, how
cult to answded to condndividualizerstanding oon, we beliee them bettcise, but toms. To this would draw
Study can b
ountries haich serves a
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
n assistanc only recented in seved eventuallyions on thei
e EU Host Nnational recrations unde Participatof need undcount.
minent pargrated as aStudy, aimiCountries,
to the overoperations
ntial for the
of implemenseveral resfrom the anm openly s, if relevawever, provwer the numduct in-coue the quesof the reseeve, this couter understo provide tend, it was
w only gene
e summariz
ve rules ans a good ba
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
e. Host nantly been ga
ral differeny remove air territories
Nation Supcommendatder the Uniting States.der this fram
rt of the civa key subjecing to depic raises awarall objectivs. It is also e eventual
ntation of search technswer Partnavailable
nt, under ved to be inmerous quentry intervi
stions in a earchers abuld also givand that th
them with s also decideral conclus
zed as follow
d practices asis for any
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
tion suppoaining grounnt fora to aall foreseeabs.
port Guidetions and pion Civil Pr Third counmework are
vil protectioct also in thct the existiareness of ve of strenghoped thatimproveme
HNS or HNhniques havner countrieresources, this Progra
nsufficient aestions reqiews in the
more persbout the exve ground tohe major aimpotential ined that this
sions, witho
ws:
in place thafurther pro
Response to Manast)
ort, the connd in the disddress the ble obstacle
lines adoptpractices sprotection Mntries that ae also encou
on capacity he training ng status othe import
gthening tht the Partneent of their
S-related pve been uses provided
such as pamme, for as Partner cuesting deshope that
sonal set-uxisting systeo trust fromm of complnsight of hos Study shouout individu
at pertain toogress in this
n-made
ncept alreasaster relieissue, whic
es with the
ted in Janupecifically tMechanism
are likely touraged to t
building pacurricula a
of relevant ltance of hoe Partner Cers will emr HNS syste
provisions ised. Initiall
d to a comppieces of l
example. Tcountries sescriptive anthey would
up and thuems of the
m the side oleting the Sow they cauld be as d
ual (i.e. per
o host natios field
7
ady firmly f context. ch aim to potential
ary 2012, arget the and thus o request ake these
ackage of nd in the egislation
ost nation Countries’ brace the m on the
n general ly, it was rehensive egislation The main eemed to nswers. It d provide
us further e Partner of Partner Study was an further escriptive r country)
on
8
Tcoco
Ninanco
Itas
Top
Rbar
5 ME
5.1 Un
GovernmdevelopmDuring thwere reiprotect pconsequein most seen as c
On the oPartner Cthe Soviecivil proacknowlecertain dfocused p
Develo
he inter-insooperation oordination
No specific enterventionny eventuaomplex disa
t is of outmossistance in
o successfuersonnel
egional cooe further derrangement
ETHODOL
nderlying a
ments of thement of thehe last decnforced an
people, propences of thPartners th
competent a
ther hand, Countries caet Union thtection actedge the redegree of gprimarily on
oped by EU-fundean
stitutional cstructures
n challenges
experiencess. It is there
al weaknessaster scenar
ost importanto the natio
ully establish
operation ineveloped; bts than poli
LOGY
assumptio
e Partner Ceir respectivcade the dind moderniperty and this process h
he civil protand reliable
the civil proan be consi
hat the focutivities; a fecent procegeneralization emergenc
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
oordinationhas the pots once host
in relation efore quests of their prio.
ance to cononal coordin
h and run a
n the field obased on extical consid
ons
Countries pve countriesaster manzed in ordhe environmhas been thtection aute.
otection / ddered relat
us shifted ffact also csses at globon it can bcy response
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
n structurestential to renation sup
to host nattionable howresent, sec
sider the mnation struc
a HNS syste
of mutual axisting connderations.
pay significaes’ resiliencnagement ser to answment from he increase thorities ha
disaster pretively youngfrom the hiconfirmed bal level anbe stated the.
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
s at nationaeduce cross-port is cons
tion supporw mindful t
ctor-specific
modalities ofctures.
m Partner c
assistance aections, bu
ant politicale to the nasystems in
wer their mhazards of dof public trve a rather
paredness ag, because ighly militarby legislatid the needhat their ci
Response to Manast)
l level, as a-sector and sidered as a
t have beenthe Partnerc arrangeme
f how to int
countries ne
and host nat with more
and financatural and mmost of th
main purposdifferent tyrust to the r positive im
and managit was only rized civil don. Also, t for disastevil protecti
n-made
lready exist inter-instit
a wider conc
n acquired fr countries aents in rela
tegrate inte
eed proper
ation suppoe focus on f
cial attentioman-made he Partner se, i.e. to epe. One of emergencymage and
ement systafter the co
defence methough all
er preventioion system
ting tutional cept.
from past are about ation to a
ernational
ly trained
ort should functional
on to the disasters. Countries efficiently the social
y services; are often
ems in all ollapse of asures to Partners
on, with a s are still
All Partnhoweverthere is a
In this fiethe regiocoordinathat the transportdevelopmhoweveraffected
It is impodoes notrecommethe Studydata theymaking tMechaniacknowle
5.2 Lim
Given thereceiving
Similarly,and shadevelopm
Though responsibpurpose transit co
Media hapreparatRelation not featu
2 Refer to f
Develo
ner Countrir, still to bea need for in
eld, at the on, with altion mecharecomment, together ment of HNr, the possthe Partner
ortant to ut intend to endations iy has been y provided the findingsm, howevedged and r
mitations
e overall sug civil protec
, the Studyll not tou
ment-relate
the diffebilities of aof the Stu
ountries.
andling andion for inteto third par
ure in this p
further details
oped by EU-fundean
ies have dee examinednternationa
moment Nl Partners anisms of adations of with all its
NS-related pibilities thar countries’
underline agassess whenternationavoluntary. and also a
gs open to ver, some respected2.
ubject of thction assista
y concentrach early w
ed assistanc
erent intessisting stady is to de
d other puberventions rties, mainlyroject.
s under the in
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
eveloped ind and verifial disaster re
NATO may bbeing part
and operatiothe NATO Ms templates
proceduresat all othe HNS arrang
gain that thether the Paally availablIn a declarny eventuaother Partreservatio
is whole Prance is give
tes on the warning, rise.
ernational tes and org
escribe the
blic communincluding asy engaged i
ndividual coun
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
nternationaed how thelief assista
be considerof NATO/E
onal links tMemorandus, have beewithin the r compilatigements.
his work shartner counle. Thereforation, eachl finding, wtner countons from
ogramme iten primary a
phase of psk reductio
guidelinesganisations
capacities
nication forssistance oin humanita
ntry reports in
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
al cooperate relevant
ance.
red an impoEAPC and tto NATO/EAum of Undeen taken inPartner Co
ions of rel
hall not impntries compre, the cont
h participatiwith the Eur
ries and / certain Pa
t has been attention in
preparedneon, preven
and recas well, it of the Ben
rms are notf military narian aid, su
n Chapter 6.
Response to Manast)
tion to a clinks functi
ortant coopthus possibADRCC. It iserstanding oto primary
ountries. Thevant guid
ply any scruply with anytribution ofng country
ropean Comor Particip
artner cou
decided tha this Study.
ess and firsttion, long-
commendatwas under
neficiaries a
t covered innature is nouch as NGOs
n-made
certain exteion in prac
peration strbly benefitins therefore on vital cro
y account dhis does notdelines have
utiny procey of the HNf the Benefi
agreed to mmission. Apating Statentries hav
at HNS in re.
t response -term reco
tions inclrstood that as host nat
n this Studyot consideres and volun
9
ent, it is, ctice once
ructure in ng of the assumed
oss-border uring the t exclude, e equally
edure and NS-related iciaries to share the
As regards es of the
ve to be
elation to
activities very and
ude the the main
tions and
y. Equally, ed either. nteers will
10
The Studnor doesthat it wconsider
5.3 Wh
As variouhad to bfor this relevant relevant organizatcountries
E
IFre
N
IN
O
Some seTampereConventi
Having enone of “guidelinsubstant
- Tararstye
- Tcira
Develo
dy does nots it aim to owill offer fo
any eventu
hat guide
us compilate decided fStudy. Maiand / or afor civil p
tions that s, etc. There
U Host Nati
FRC Guidelielief and ini
NATO Memo
NSARAG Gu
Oslo Guidelin
ector-specife Conventioion on custo
xamined ththe “gene
nes” were iated by the
he EU Hostre relativelyre all potetructures ofet to this co
he IDRL guiivil protectiather only f
oped by EU-fundean
t intend to offer recomood for thoual need for
lines?
tions of HNfirst which sinly those applicable fprotection the Partne
efore the fo
ion Support
nes for thetial recover
orandum of
idelines (Se
nes (Art. 51
fic recommon, the Istaoms proced
hese documeral” ones elaborated e following
t Nation Suy new set oential benef the Mechaooperation
delines addon assistan
from a legal
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
evaluate thmendation
ought and tr improvem
NS-related gset of themmajor comfor this woassistance
ers are parollowings ha
t Guidelines
e domestic ry assistanc
f Understan
ector D2, “A
1-57)
mendations nbul conve
dures.
ents also incould be for the p
considerati
upport Guidof recommeeficiaries ofanism, the so that thes
dress a mucce interven than pract
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
he prepares to them ithe opportent in their
guidelines am should bempilations work, such as
interventirty to, or tave been co
s
facilitatione (IDRL Gui
ding on vita
Affected cou
relevant tention on t
n light of theused aloneurposes ofions:
delines withendations. Af the assisPartner couse guideline
ch wider spentions coverical point o
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
dness of thndividuallyunity to thr systems.
and recomme taken intowere resears for e.g. tons, or arthose alreaonsidered:
n and regudelines)
al cross-bor
untry respo
to HNS weemporary a
e scope of oe as baselif the Study
hin the UniAdditionallystance provuntries cannes are fully
ectrum of inr. Also, theyf view.
Response to Manast)
he individua. On the ote Partner c
mendations considerat
rched that hose covere “product
ady in prac
lation of in
rder transpo
nsibilities”)
ere also stadmission a
our work, itne data, by. This con
on Civil Proy, though thvided undenot be consrelevant to
nternationay tend to ap
n-made
al Partner cher hand itcountries t
s are in exition as basehave been
ring subjectts” of intectice in the
nternationa
ort
tudied, sucand the 20
t was conclubut a specinsideration
otection Mhe Partner er the coosidered clostheir opera
al disaster rpproach the
countries, t is hoped to further
stence, it eline data n deemed t matters
ernational e Partner
l disaster
h as the 006 Kyoto
uded that ial set of was also
echanism countries
ordination se enough ations.
elief than e question
- Tacas
- Tin
The folloaccount partially,
1 EM
1.1 Legass
1.2 Insto
1.3 Deiderel
1.4 Neass
1.5 Infinfma
1.6 Eninc
1.7 Preinc
1.8 Allris
2 EM
2.1 Enass
2.2 Us
2.3 Coint
2.4 HNint
3 LO
3.1 Ide
3.2 Waan
Develo
he INSARAcknowledgessistance in
he Oslo guinvolvement
owing tablefor this Stu in the sam
MERGENCY P
gal framewosistance stitutional andeal with inc
ecision makinentified resplation to incoeeds assessmsess situatioformation mformation wiaintenance osure relevan
coming interepare countrcoming inter-sector risk aks v. resourc
MERGENCY M
sure accuratsessment e template f
oordination sternational aNS Team / ceternational te
OGISTICS AND
entify border
aive visa reqd transit
oped by EU-fundean
AG guidelined, that th
nterventions
idelines addt of such ass
e summarizudy, also dee or similar
PLANNING
ork in place to
nd administrcoming assisng system in onsibilities ooming assista
ment methodn and needs anagement sith internatio
of a national nt training ofnational assiry profile to national teaassessment ices) analysis MANAGEMEN
te and timely
for request f
structure in passistance ell in place toeams D TRANSPOR
r crossing / e
uirements o
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
nes target hese guides, too).
dress the usets is highl
es the seleetailing in wr meaning.
o deal with i
ative framewstance place with c
of key authorance
dology in plac
system in plaonal actors (iPOC)
f personnel distance be handed oms in place, incl
NT
y situation an
or internatio
place to deal
o assist incom
RT
entry points
r grant visas
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
operationelines could
se of MCDAighted in th
ected HNS-which othe
ncoming
work in place
clearly rities, also in
ce to quickly
ace to share incl.
dealing with
over to
. a gap (i.e.
nd needs
onal assistan
with incomi
ming
in advance
s for entry, ex
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
ns of USAd easily be
A in disastehese guideli
related issuer existing g
The
Stu
dy
X
e X
n X
y X
X
X
ce X
ing X
xit X
Response to Manast)
AR teams e adapted
er relief; thenes
ues that haguidelines t
EU H
NS
Guid
elin
es
IDRL
G
idli
X X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X X
n-made
only (thouto civil p
e particular
ave been tathey appea
Gui
delin
es
INSA
RAG
Guid
elin
es
NAT
O
X
X
X
X
X
11
ugh it is protection
rity of the
aken into r, fully or
NAT
O
Chec
klis
t
Osl
o Gu
idel
ines
X X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
12
3.3 Wagotea
3.4 Wado
3.5 Prewatra
3.6 Reuse
3.7 Reuse
3.8 Reuse
3.9 Reuseop
3.10 Pedo
3.11 Enintrel
3.12 Pla
3.13 Prope
3.14 Prolod
3.15 Pro
4 LEG
4.1 Reof
4.2 Reint
4.3 Gr
4.4 Corel
4.5 Refunint
4.6 Coof
4.7 Grop
Develo
aive customsods and equams aive or reduc
ocumentationepare arrangaive tariffs, taansport duce barriere of ICT equiduce barriere of medicatduce barriere of search dduce barriere of hazardo
perations rmit re-expo
ogs, vehicles)sure approp
ternational rlief consignman for a Base
ovide adminrsonnel, tranovide subsistdging, electriovide medica
GAL AND FIN
cognize profinternationacognize the
ternational aant work pe
onsider issueslief personneduce barriernds and currternational ronsider proce
the incominant VAT-free
perations
oped by EU-fundean
s duties, taxeuipment (incl
ce inspectionn requiremegements for axes, tolls an
rs to the impipment rs to the imption and medrs to the impdogs rs to the impous material
ortation of eq and unusedriate securitelief personn
ments e of Operatio
istrative supnslation, equtence commicity, etc.) al support
NANCIAL ISS
fessional quaal relief persolegal status
actors rmits where
s of liability fel rs to the impencies neceselief actors edures to facg assistance
e / duty free
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
es, tariffs for. vehicles) of
n and adminnts in-country tr
nd other fees
port / export,
port / export,dical equipmport / export,
port / export,necessary fo
quipment (ind goods, eveny and safetynel, their equ
ons
pport (office, uipment, etcodities (food
SUES
alifications aonnel of personne
necessary
for damage c
port / export ssary for the
cilitate the refor in case ostatus for di
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
r donated f incoming
istrative /
ransport , incs in relation
, transit and
, transit and ment
, transit and
, transit and or relief
ncl. search n if donated
y of uipment and
admin. .) d, water,
nd certificat
l of assisting
caused by
and transit o operations
eimbursemeof need isaster relief
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
The
Stu
dy
X
X
cl. to
X
X
X
X
d X
X
X
X
es X
g X
X
of of
nt
Response to Manast)
EU H
NS
Guid
elin
es
IDRL
G
idli
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
n-made
Gui
delin
es
INSA
RAG
Guid
elin
es
NAT
O
X
X
X
X
X
X
NAT
O
Chec
klis
t
Osl
o Gu
idel
ines
X X
X X
X
X X
X
X X
X X
X
X X
X
X
5.4 Th
Due to thinformatsubseque
The quesvarious rquestionphase all
In additioanalysis implemerelevant.
At this preflected
Wqwsy
Inois
Fow
It was ththis worpreparedthe Partnthe overa
Interviewmany of clarify thbeen rec
Develo
e researc
he very limion was prent request
stionnaire cresponse onaire was gowed for co
on, with speof legislat
entation of .
point of thed fully the ac
With some euestionnair
without offeystems duri
n addition, spenly availa
ssue, too.
rom the mther institu
was consulte
herefore dek, by cond
d on the baner countriall results e
ws could finthe outstan
he intent ofeived.
oped by EU-fundean
h
ited availabrimarily collts for clarific
contained boptions as wgeneralizedountry-spec
ecial attenttion of ththe Program
e research ctual situat
exceptions, re. In som
ering any exing the clari
supporting able. In this
missing answution than ted even on
ecided to aducting indivsis of availaes. Unfortuxpected.
nally be connding questf the origin
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
bility of reslected in thcations.
both simplewell as que, i.e. the sacific investig
ion to the dhe Partnermme activi
it was, howion in the P
Partner coue cases oplanatory aification req
documentss respect, la
wers we alhose respoquestions f
dd a more vidual interable inform
unately, how
ducted onlytions duringal question
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
ources withhe form of
e questionsestions req
ame for all Pgation.
data collecter countriesties, was a
wever, acknPartner coun
untries did nly the m
answer or thquest phase
s, i.e. relevaanguage an
so assumedonsible for cfalling unde
personal torviews in th
mation, withwever, this
y in Armeng the discus
nnaire, to w
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
hin the Proga very com
where thequesting dePartner cou
ed during ths, all inforlso assesse
nowledged, ntries, beca
not show eultiple-choihey did not e.
ant legislatid translatio
d, that, witcivil protectr the main
ouch to thehe Partner
h introducinphase of t
ia and Azerssions, in A
which, in th
Response to Manast)
gramme fomprehensive
e responderscriptive an
untries, the
he fact findrmation gad and inclu
that the duse
enthusiasm ice questioprovide fur
on was scaon resource
th very limtion / emerresponsibili
e research acountries.
ng country-she research
rbaijan. Whzerbaijan the end, no o
n-made
r this task, e questionn
r could chonswers. Thclarificatio
ing missionathered duuded in this
draft might
to contribuons were arther detail
rcely madees proved to
mited exceprgency manity of other
and conseqAll intervie
specific queh has not y
hile Armeniahe expert cofficial resp
13
originally naire and
oose from ough the n request
ns and the uring the s Study, if
not have
ute to the answered s on their
or found o be a big
ptions, no agement, sectors.
quently to ews were estions to yielded to
a clarified could only ponse has
14
In Belarusignalledposition or provid
Moldovainterviewcomplemunrest aconduct
Develo
us, it was n that due tto give furt
ded during t
had alreadw, which cmented the
nd politicalinterviews
oped by EU-fundean
not possiblto current pher answerthe request
dy providedcould not existing kn
l situation iin Kiev.
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
e to organprocesses tors and expla for clarifica
d significantbe organi
owledge ofin Ukraine
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
ize any into change alanation to tation proce
t amount ofized in thf researcheduring Ma
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
terview in tll relevant lhose alreadss.
f answers dhe given trs with furtrch and Ap
Response to Manast)
the given tegislation t
dy included
during the pime framether detailspril 2014 ma
n-made
time framethey were nin the ques
previous phe, could o. And lastlyade it impo
. Georgia not in the stionnaire
hases; the nly have
y, the civil ossible to
6 HN
The follocountriesdirectly dProgram
It must bcountriesshall be research
6.1 Ar
Armenia country legislatio
Overall f
From theprovisionthe otheexisting internati
Though operatioto receivsubstantinsufficie
In Armenconcept further iauthoritiemphasispersonne
Develo
NS IN THE
owing chaps currently during the rme as well
be noted ths civil protetherefore c.
menia
answered interview o
on.
findings
e data recens governiner hand, a
rules, regonal exercis
Armenia dns, in the s
ve internatioiated this
ent training
nia the civil of host natiinformationes is that ts being on el from diffe
oped by EU-fundean
PARTNER
ters contaiin place. Th
research foras openly a
hat the autection / disaconsidered
the questiorganized in
eived, Armg certain Hcomplete Hulations anse, organize
did not reself assessmonal assistamark withof involved
protection ion supportn has beenhe followinHNS. They eerent agenc
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
R COUNTR
n informathese are sor this Studyvailable.
hor did notaster manaas percept
onnaire ann April 201
enian authNS areas se
HNS systemnd practiceed in partne
port to hament exercisance an ave issues ari
d personnel,
/ disaster mt in generaln received. ng ENPI Proexpect an incies.
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
RIES
ion on HNSlely based o
y and found
t have any agement arrtion from a
nd numerou14 as well
orities haveem to be i
m has not bes could bership with
ave experise of the qerage 3.5 oising from , and some
managemen. In addition Thereforegrammes sncreased nu
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
S or HNS-reon the data in other do
preliminaryrangementsall informat
us questionas after ha
e a good gin place undbeen institube verified NATO EADR
enced anyuestionnairut of 5.0. Wnot sufficiproblems r
nt sector is n, other sec
e one of thhould keepumber of co
Response to Manast)
elated arraa provided bocuments e
y knowledgs; all the betion made
s were claraving consu
grasp of thder the resutionalized.
during thRCC.
y major prre they rateWithout anyient legislarelated to lo
reported toctors may ahe requirem
p the focus ourses in or
n-made
ngement oby Partner
elaborated u
ge about thelow presenavailable d
rified durinulted some
he HNS conponsible se. The functhe “Armen
roblem due their prepy further dtive covera
ogistics.
o be familiarlso be awarments of Aon training
rder to invo
15
of Partner countries under the
e Partner nted data uring the
ng the in-e relevant
ncept and ectors. On tioning of nia 2010”
ring past paredness etail they age, with
r with the re, but no Armenian gs, special olve more
16
Findings
The followere ide
EMERGENCY
Legal framewincoming int
Develo
by HNS top
owing table ntified duri
Y PLANNING
work applicaternational a
oped by EU-fundean
pics
summarizeng the rese
G
able for assistance
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
es all measuearch.
Bilateral aMontenegUkraine.
Armenia hinternatioTampere procedure
Other rele
- Agreethe Rorganon enmann
- AgreeCoopeemergman-
- Agreeconsetechn
Major piethough, a
- Em
- Gas
- Gpo
Applicabledecree is force a ra
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
ures ensuri
agreementsgro, Poland,
has signed uonal agreemConvention,es and the N
evant intern
ement betweRepublic of Anizing importntry of personer during di
ement amoneration (BSE
rgency assist-made disast
ement on coequences of nological nat
eces of applicat this stage,
Emergency A
Government as humanitar
Government opulation pr
e legislation being plann
ange of emer
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
ng host nat
s are in forceRussia, Swit
p to / pledgements / guide
, the 2006 KyNATO MoU o
ational agree
een the Unitrmenia was t, export andnnel of humsasters and e
ng the GoverEC) Participatance and emters, signed o
ooperation inemergency sture of the C
cable nationait is unclear
ction Plan of
Decree No. 6rian aid.
Decree No. 9rotection pla
is under theed to be adorgency powe
Response to Manast)
tion suppor
with Belarutzerland, Swe
ed to / aligneelines affectiyoto Convenn vital cross-
ements:
ted Nations aconcluded in
d transit of huanitarian assemergency s
rnments of thting States o
mergency reson 15 April 1
n preventionsituations of
CIS countries
al legislationwhich HNS p
f governmen
66-N of 2003
919 of 10 Junan in case of
e process of ropted beforers that may
n-made
rt in Armen
s, China, Geoeden, Turkm
ed with the fing host natition on cust-border tran
and the Govn January 20umanitariansistance in a situations.
the Black Seaon collaborasponse to na1998
n and liquidaf natural andsigned on 2
n include theprovisions ar
ntal organiza
3 on the goo
ne 2011 on tf a strong ea
review and ae 2015. It wilbe enacted a
nia, which
orgia, menistan, and
following on support: oms sport.
vernment of 014 on goods and simplified
a Economic ation in atural and
ation of d
22 Jan 1993
followings, re included:
ations
ods provided
the arthquake
a new l bring into as a result of
d
d
f
Institutionaladministratimanagemento incomingassistance
Risk assessm(risks v. avai
Develo
l, decision mive and infornt structuresg internationa
ment and gapilable resour
oped by EU-fundean
making, rmation s in relation al
p analysis rces)
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
or during revealed a
The data have resp
Ministry manages
Ministry medical amedical p
Ministry oimport pr
Ministry o
Ministry coordinat
Police- en
Ministry ocommunic
Civil aviaairports) -services a
During thfollowing Ministry oand Custoand Commreiteratedtime all thopportunemergencassistancean excellebest pract
This HNS
In the la
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
disaster. At about this de
available revponsibilities c
of Emergenall the rescu
of Health-assistance a
personnel;
of Finance (rocedures of
of Agricultur
of Foreigntion of reque
nsure securit
of communiication servic
ation genera- comprehen
at the airport
e in-countryinstitutions
of Agriculturoms Commitmunication, d how imporhe above insity to underscy situationse is needed. ent basis for tices as well
area was int
ast years, J
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
this point, hecree.
vealed the foconcerning in
ncy Situatioue activities;
carries ouand regulat
(State Revenall the rescu
re- food , and
n Affairs –est for interna
y and safety;
ication and tces;
al departmensive assistant level;
y interview towere also ree, Police (Mitee (MinistryMinistry of H
rtant a step htitutions to dstand their r reaching theThe achievefuture coopas shortcom
troduced onl
JICA suppor
Response to Manast)
owever, no s
ollowing instincoming inte
ons- coordin
ut drug/medtes the prob
ue Committee equipment
d rescue dog
– simplifiedational assis
;
transport- pr
nt (Zvartnotnce and prov
o clarify outsepresented: inistry of Intey of Finance)Health. Afterhad been takdiscuss HNS oles and rese level whenments of thieration and t
mings.
y for the inte
rted Armen
n-made
specific data
itutions of Aernational as
nate the wh
dicine contrblems of th
ee)- simplifiet and goods;
g control;
d visa procstance proces
rovision of tr
ts/ Gyumri ivision of all th
standing queMinistry of Ferior), State ), Ministry ofr the meetingken to involvissues. It gaponsibilities
n internationis meeting cothe identific
erviews.
nian authori
17
a could be
Armenia that ssistance:
hole process,
rol, provideshe incoming
ed customs&;
cedures andss;
ransport and
internationahe necessary
estions the Finance, Revenues f Transport g it was
ve the first ve them thefor
nal ould provideation of
ities to run
,
s g
&
d
d
l y
e
e
n
18
Standardizemethodologsituation anpopulation
EMERGENCY
Accurate anneeds assess
Use of existiinternationa
Coordinatiodeal with incassistance
Develo
d needs assegy to assess td needs of t
Y MANAGEM
d timely situsment
ing templateal assistance
n structure icoming inter
oped by EU-fundean
essment the he
MENT
uation and
e to request
n place to rnational
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
earthquakmanagemprocess wrespond a
Multi-Clusimplemen
In additioprocedurephysical ethis are stCommittedamage tinsurance
ResponsibForeign A
Outstandi
Since the needed ondivision ofas on howdecision minternatioYes, mostINSARAG internatio
Accordingmake thebased on decision ias the con
Once the it’s local e
For the mnational capplies.
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
ke assessmment of conwas identifieand eliminat
ster/sector Inted in coop
on, the Govere for the ass
entities as a rtipulated in tee for assessto property ine purposes, s
bility of the MAffairs, Minist
ding question
legislation isn the proces
of roles and rw the data comaking chainonal assistant probably owguidelines. I
onal actors.
g to Governme final decisio
the advice os then implentact point f
internationaemergency m
moment, intecoordination
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
ent and tonsequencesed that addie the conseq
nitial Rapid Aeration with
rnment decressment of dresult of emethe standardsment of damn principle, tstill to be con
Ministry of Etry of Econo
ns
s in developms, on the cooesponsibilitieollected on nn, especially nce. wn templateIt is used for
ment Decreeon on any reqof the Ministemented by tor internatio
al teams arrimanagement
rnational assn structures o
Response to Manast)
gether withprocess wastional resou
quences of e
Assessment UNDP.
ee 1582 of 2damage sustergency situa
d operating pmage. As thesthe main objnfirmed.
mergency Simy, in line w
ment stage, fordination mes of the mineeds and daas regards th
e developed acommunica
919 of 1985quest for intery of Emergethe Ministry onal partners
ve and start t staff respon
sistance is inon ad-hoc ba
n-made
h experts fs analyzed.
urces may bearthquakes
(MIRA) conc
2011 sets up tained by legations. Furth
procedures fose provisionective is rec
ituations. Mwith MIRA.
further explamechanism annistries involvamages is fedhe request fo
according totion with all
5 the Prime Mernational aency Situatioof Foreign A
s.
operate in tnsibility to su
ntegrated witasis; no stand
from RussiaDuring this
e needed toin Armenia
cept was
the gal and her details ofor the s consider koned to be
inistry of
anation is nd the ved, as well d into the or
o the
Minister is tossistance,
ons. This Affairs, acting
he country upport them
thin the dard rule
, s o
f
o
g
LOGISTICS A
Waive visa rvisas for ent
Waive custofor donated (incl. vehicle
Inspection adocumentatreduced / w
Barriers to ttransit and uare reduced
Barriers to ttransit and umedical equ
Develo
AND TRANSP
requirementstry, exit and t
oms duties, tgoods and e
es) of incomi
and administtion requirem
waived
he import / euse of ICT eq
he import / euse of medicuipment are r
oped by EU-fundean
PORT
s or grant transit
axes, tariffs equipment ng teams
rative / ments are
export, quipment
export, cation and reduced
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
Yes.
CIS and Erequestedexperienctype of reagency), athis decre
Yes
Yes. Stateresponse to complecircumsta
Special focrossing /
Most pro
GovernmoperationemergencTransportcommunicare of coemergencapproveddecree doequipmen
In accordaof importArmenia. medical p
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
U Member Sd for internace limitationesponding acas specified iee still to be s
e Revenues Cto a disaster
ex entry requances.
orms are curr/ customs pr
bably in acco
ment decree 1n and managcy situationst and Commication plansommunicatiocy situations
d radio frequoes not, hownt by interna
ance with Goting and expWithin 20 d
products for
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
States will hational assistas subject to t
ctor (i.e. govein Governmespecified).
Committee rer by the inteuirements th
rently being ocedures
ordance with
1442 of 2012gement of eles. According tunications is
s, including foon lines to sts and in line wencies to inc
wever, specifiational teams
overnment Dporting medic
ays before ththe purpose
Response to Manast)
ave visa requance. Other the nature oernmental / ent Decree 2
eports that grnational com
hat may appl
developed t
h the Tampe
2 sets the proectronic comto its provisis responsibleor emergencate entities dwith this rulecoming teamically discusss.
Decree No. 5cine and druhe planned ds of humanit
n-made
uirements wainternationa
of the requesnon governm
229/2008 (wi
goods and semmunity arely under norm
o facilitate b
re Conventio
ocedure for tmmunication
ons, the Mine for developcy situations.during the pe it will also p
ms, if so reques the use of I
581 of 2000 oug substancedelivery of dtarian assista
19
aived if al actors mayst and the mental ith subject of
ervices in e not liable mal
border
on.
the networks in
nistry of ping . It also takeseriod of provide ested. This CT
on the rules es into rugs and / oance the
y
f
s
r
20
Reduce barrexport, trandogs
Re-exportatsearch dogs,goods, even
Ensuring appsafety of intpersonnel, trelief consig
Provision of logistic supppersonnel, ttransport, et
Provision of commoditieelectricity, e
Develo
riers to the imsit and use o
ion of equip, vehicles) an if donated i
propriate secernational reheir equipm
gnments
administratport (office, aranslation, etc.)
subsistences (food, wat
etc.)
oped by EU-fundean
mport / of search
ment (incl. nd unused s permitted
curity and elief ent and
ive and admin. equipment,
er, lodging,
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
following import pename, doand quanunder WHof registrathe produalso requcertificatethen be islaborator
In additioprovided medicatiocorresponprovisions
Yes.
Documenoffer. All vborder cravailabilitmicrochip
Yes
Security isrelief team
Administrtechnical available
Armenia edays, espeINSARAG be require
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
documentatermit applicaosage, drug fo
tity) plus anyHO’s internatation in the cuced companired to subme to import dssued by thery tests basis
on, Governmas humanita
ons. It wouldnding rules, es of the abov
nts of SAR doveterinary inossing pointty of pet pasps, no furthe
s assumed bms shall ensu
rative / office/ ICT supporfree of charg
expects disaecially in terguidelines. Ied from an e
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
tion shall beation (incl. trorm, producy of the follotional systemcountry of ony. If the dru
mit standard drugs and / o Ministry of .
ent Decree Narian aid als
d be of benefiespecially as ve mentioned
ogs shall be pnspections ars, by the Minsport or offic
er entry requ
oth by the hure safety on
er support, irt as well as ge.
ster relief tems of lodginIt is acknowlearlier onset
Response to Manast)
submitted tademark namer, country o
owing certificm of quality crigin, or qua
ug is not regisdocuments f
or medical prHealth on do
No. 66 of 200o regulates t
fit to receive fregards how
d decree.
provided upore then arrannistry of Agricial veterinarirements sha
ost and sendn site of ope
nterpretatioinland transp
ams to be seg and food sedged, howe.
n-made
to the Ministme of drug, of origin, expcates: a certicertification,lity certificatstered in Armfor quality coroducts to Aocumentary
03 on the gothe import ofurther infor
w they corres
on acceptancnged to be ciculture. In cry certificateall be compl
ding nation. rations.
on and eventport and fue
elf-sufficientsupplies, in liever, water s
try of Healthgeneric
piration dateificate issued, certificate te issued by menia, it is ontrol. The rmenia will and / or
oods of rmation on spond to the
ce of the arried out at
case of e and ied with.
Incoming
ually l are
for 7-10 ine with the supplies may
:
e d
t
y
Provision of
LEGAL AND
Recognize pqualificationinternationa
Recognize thpersonnel ofactors
Consider issdamage cau
Develo
medical sup
FINANCIAL I
rofessional ns and certifial relief perso
he legal statuf assisting in
ues of liabilitsed by relief
oped by EU-fundean
pport
ISSUES
cates of onnel
us of ternational
ty for f personnel
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
On the abDistributiSituation,
Yes, no in
Yes, with
On the ot“classifiedfirst is conprocessesother hanto prevenNGOs andmay be ree.g. in casstated by scrutiny p
Mostly bi
Other asp
The compof circuminternatiomalpractithe criminbrought awith on ca
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
bove basis alon channels , local manag
nformation w
no certificat
ther hand it md” (INSARAGnsidered pers in place andnd, as Armennt unwanted d other interequired addise of medica the Ministry
process is arr
lateral agree
pects may be
plexity of thisstances that
onal laws maice are national one, so itagainst internase-by-case
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
l commoditiare arrange
gement auth
whether free
tion procedu
must be noteG, EU moduler se as compd therefore a
nia has curreinternationa
rnational actotional proof l interventioy of Health. Aranged.)
ements settle
e covered by
s issue is nott could be apay be applicanally heard it is unlikely tnational persbasis.
Response to Manast)
es are providd by the Min
horities and p
of charge or
re
ed there is des) and “non-lying with vaadditional scntly no contral assistanceors who has of certificati
on or adminisAt this stage
e this issue
Government
t much consipplied. In cas
ble. In princn the civil cohat criminal sonnel. How
n-made
ded free of cnistry of Emeprivate comp
r against pay
distinction be-classified” t
arious qualitycrutiny is unlrol mechanis
e entering theresponded u
ion / qualificstration of d
e it is unclear
t Decree 229
idered, due tse of medicaliple, cases o
ourt system r charges wo
wever, cases a
21
charge. ergency panies.
yment
etween eams. The y assurance ikely. On thesm in place e country, unilaterally cation (for rugs, as
r how this
9/2008.
to the range l negligence,f medical rather than uld be are dealt
e
22
6.2 AzIn o
governmdiscuss tprotectioApproxim1. Minist2. Minist3. Police/4. Custom5. Minist6. Minist7. Minist
Ashowed athe conce For Azerrelevant ProgramAzerbaijanext twocooperat
6.3 Be
Though Bprovidedthe Belarthe answrelevant
In additioConseque
Overall f
From thebut certain place aprovidedinternati
Belarus rthe ques
Develo
erbaijan order to int
mental depathe HNS quon experts omately fortytry of Emergtry of Foreig/Border Polms/Ministrytry of Transptry of Healthtry of Telecoll participana real interept. rbaijan autlegislation,me will be
ani Urban So years. Thtion betwee
elarus
Belarus ansd no clarificarus authoritwers to the
information
on, Belarus ently, all inf
findings
e data studiain existing and practic
d assistanceonal exercis
rates their pstionnaire.
oped by EU-fundean
troduce the artments asuestionnaireof the Consoy representagency Situatgn Affairs ice/Ministry
y of Financeportation h ommunicatints were ve
rest in prom
thorities, ta it seems thimplement
Search and his may be en sectors.
swered the ation to theties in the g
questionnan already ac
did not speformation in
ed we assuprovisions es could be
e to Belaruses in 2009
preparedneThey repo
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
concept of ssociated we with relevortium attenatives from tions
y of Interiore
ion, attendeery interest
moting a po
aking into chat one of ttation of th
Rescue teathe cataly
questionnae requestediven time fraire, most ocquired dur
cify whethen this count
me that nomight pert
e verified wus, followin.
ss to receivort to have
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
f Host Natiowith the Mvant deleganded the Nathe followin
r
ed this meeted about tholicy or legis
consideratiothe area of e HNS concam will be yst to devel
aire, until td items. Alsrame. Thereof which anring the Prog
er it agrees try chapter
o host natiotain to the s
were in Marcng a break
ve internatioe certain l
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
on Support (Ministry of
ates, on 11ational Adving departm
ting chairedhe HNS conslation that
on the currf interest in cept. One fuseeking INSlop HNS an
the work wso, no interefore the benswers coulgramme.
to share theshall be tre
n support ssame effectch 2007, wh
of gasolin
onal assistaegislation
Response to Manast)
(HNS) to theEmergency
1th of April isory Group
ments:
d by PPRD Encept and tht could be d
rent procesthe 2nd Phaurther poinSARAG clas
nd create th
as submitterviews couldelow summald not be ve
e findings wated with c
system is est. The last ohen Latvia te line, as
nce an averin place, b
n-made
e various Azy Situations
one of thep meeting.
EAST team lhe level of developed t
sses of chaase of the Pnt of note isssification whe coordina
ed for first d be conduary is solely
verified and
with any stacaution.
stablished inoccasions wtogether wwell as du
rage 3.0 oubut they m
zerbaijani s, and to e EU civil
eader. questions to further
anging all PPRD East s that the within the ation and
review it cted with based on on other
akeholder.
n Belarus, when laws ith Russia
uring two
t of 5.0 in may have
experienin the in-
In principwith the relevant
Findings
The followere ide
EMERGENCY
Legal framewincoming int
Develo
ced proble-country coo
ple, Belarus concept oprovisions
by HNS top
owing tablentified duri
Y PLANNING
work applicaternational a
oped by EU-fundean
ms during pordination s
s reports thf host natioof bilateral
pics
summarizeng the rese
G
able for assistance
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
past operatstructures a
hat the civilon supportagreement
es all measearch.
No direct legal and identifiedsupport:
- Law Nagainoveraprote
- Law oinstitudetailcovermana
- Law nlegal of emreferethis lacivil u
AdditionaKyrgyzstaUzbekista
The Statethe coordprovisionsand its co
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
tion as regaand into the
l protectiont in generalts on mutua
sures ensur
informationinstitutional
d the followin
No. 141/98 onst Natural aall organizatiection of the
on Emergencutional framling the obligrs the responagement.
no. 117/2002and instituti
mergency, as ence is madeaw seems tounrest.
ally, bilateraln, Latvia, Lit
an.
e Emergencydination systes relating to
ontent are un
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
ards the inte emergenc
n / disaster l; this may al disaster re
ing host na
n received onl analysis comng legal acts
on the Proteand Man-maonal and legpopulation.
cy Authoritieework of emgations of thnse and reco
2 on the Staonal framewspecial temp
e towards narather orien
l agreementhuania, Mol
y Prevention em of disasteHNS. At this
nclear.
Response to Manast)
egration of cy operation
managemederive from
elief.
ation suppo
n applicable nmpleted withthat may ha
ction of Popade Emergenal standards
es and Entitimergency ma
e different every phases
te of Emergework for the dporary legal atural and / ont to war-like
ts are in forcedova, Russia
and Eliminaer response, stage the le
n-made
f internationns.
ent sector im the appl
ort in Belar
national legihin the Prograve effect on
pulation and ncies, regulats for respons
ies, setting oanagement, wentities. This
of disaster
ency, stipuladeclaration oregime applor man-madee situations o
e with Azerba, Tajikistan,
ation System, might also hegal status of
23
nal actors
s familiar ication of
us, which
slation. The ramme host nation
Territories ting the e and
ut the with law mainly
ating the of the state icable. No e disasters; or internal
baijan, Ukraine and
m, describing have f this system
m
24
Institutionaladministratimanagemento incomingassistance
Risk assessm(risks v. avai
Standardizemethodologsituation anpopulation
EMERGENCY
Accurate anneeds assess
Use of existiinternationa
Develo
l, decision mive and infornt structuresg internationa
ment and gapilable resour
d needs assegy to assess td needs of t
Y MANAGEM
d timely situsment
ing templateal assistance
oped by EU-fundean
making, rmation s in relation al
p analysis rces)
essment the he
MENT
uation and
e to request
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
The answBelarus thinternatio
CommissiMinistersresponse
Ministry foperative
Republica
Ministry fcountries assistance
This HNS interview open:
Has Belarchecked a
Not in pla
Responsib
Outstandi
How is disinto the cwith specassistance
No
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
wers to questhat may haveonal assistan
ion for Emer, being respoactivities
for Emergene agency
an Emergenc
for Foreign A and organize
area was intwas organiz
rus done risk against ident
ace
bility of the M
ding issues:
saster assesscoordination cial attentione.
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
ionnaire reve responsibilce:
rgency Situaonsible for st
ncy Situation
cy Managem
Affairs to actzations for th
troduced onlzed in Belaru
assessmenttified risks? If
Ministry of E
sment organstructures a
n to the decis
Response to Manast)
ealed the folities concern
tions, subordtrategic coor
ns, being the
ment and Res
t as first counhe provision o
y for the inteus, the follow
? Have all-timf yes, details
mergency Si
ized? How isnd the decisi
sion on any re
n-made
llowing institning incomin
dinate to therdination of
primary resp
sponse Cent
nterpart witof internatio
erviews. Givewing question
me resources on methodo
ituations
s the collecteion making p
request for in
tutions of ng
e Council of emergency
ponsible
re
h foreign onal
en that no ns remain
s been ever ology.
ed data fed processes, nternational
Coordinatiodeal with incassistance
LOGISTICS A
Waive visa rvisas for ent
Waive custofor donated (incl. vehicle
Inspection adocumentatreduced / w
Barriers to ttransit and uare reduced
Barriers to ttransit and umedical equ
Reduce barrexport, trandogs
Re-exportatsearch dogs,goods, even
Ensuring appsafety of intpersonnel, trelief consig
Provision of logistic supppersonnel, ttransport, et
Provision of commoditieelectricity, e
Develo
n structure icoming inter
AND TRANSP
requirementstry, exit and t
oms duties, tgoods and e
es) of incomi
and administtion requirem
waived
he import / euse of ICT eq
he import / euse of medicuipment are r
riers to the imsit and use o
ion of equip, vehicles) an if donated i
propriate secernational reheir equipm
gnments
administratport (office, aranslation, etc.)
subsistences (food, wat
etc.)
oped by EU-fundean
n place to rnational
PORT
s or grant transit
axes, tariffs equipment ng teams
rative / ments are
export, quipment
export, cation and reduced
mport / of search
ment (incl. nd unused s permitted
curity and elief ent and
ive and admin. equipment,
er, lodging,
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
No inform
Yes.
Yes.
No inform
No speciaprocedure
No inform
Bilateral timport / e
No; quara
Yes
Security is
Translatio
Belarus d
Lodging, wcharge.
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
mation
mation
al forms are ues
mation
treaties waivexport of equ
antine requir
s assumed b
on services a
oes not expe
water, food,
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
used to facili
ve prohibitiouipment of i
rements are
y the host na
nd inland tra
ect disaster r
fuel and ele
Response to Manast)
itate border
ns and restrincoming tea
applied.
ation.
ansport are a
relief teams t
ctricity can b
n-made
crossing / cu
ictions conceams.
available fre
to be self-su
be provided
25
ustoms
erning the
e of charge.
ufficient.
free of
26
Provision of
LEGAL AND
Recognize pqualificationinternationa
Recognize thpersonnel ofactors
Consider issdamage cau
6.4 Ge
Georgia relevant that due to discuscould be
In principcountries
Overall f
Georgia’sdespite tstructure
The existarmed cointernatiassistancorganizedprocedur
Develo
medical sup
FINANCIAL I
rofessional ns and certifial relief perso
he legal statuf assisting in
ues of liabilitsed by relief
eorgia
has answelegislation to the curr
ss HNS in morganized a
ple, Georgis, the Europ
findings
s host natiothe system es provide f
ting systemonflict in 20onal exerc
ce was recd togetherres are also
oped by EU-fundean
pport
ISSUES
cates of onnel
us of ternational
ty for f personnel
ered the qufor further
rent processmore depth and thus so
ia agrees topean Comm
on support fnot being
or various H
m could be 008 and thecise organizeived. In a
r with US tested
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
Distributiarranged
Yes, free o
Yes, with
Most pro
Belarus dinternatio
No inform
uestionnairer review. In s of legislatthan the inme questio
o share theission and t
framework conceptua
HNS areas t
tested dure earthquazed in paraddition, n
bodies, w
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
on channels on a case-by
of charge.
no certificat
bably not co
oes not distional actor
mation receiv
e, clarified the time o
tion changenformation ons still rema
e findings ithe Particip
is defined lized. Fundo certain ex
ring some eke in 2009 rtnership wational lev
where, thou
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
of all the aby-case basis,
tion procedu
onsidered.
inct the offer
ved, the resp
related queof the interve in this field
already proain open.
included inating States
by various amental lextent.
emergencieas well as
with NATOel table-tough not as
Response to Manast)
bove servicesas appropria
re
rs on the bas
ponder was u
estions andviews, howd, they werovided. The
this Studys of the Mec
legal measugal provisio
es, such as,the “Georg
O/EADRCC, p exercisess core obj
n-made
s and commoate.
sis of the nat
unaware of t
d provided wever, they re not in theerefore no
y with othechanism.
ures alreadons and ins
, most recegia 2012” la
when intes are also jective, HN
odities are
ture of
the issue
pieces of signalled, e position interview
er Partner
y in place stitutional
ently, the arge-scale ernational
regularly NS-related
While Geproblemsas the inpreparedwould stiwhat woof legisla
Additionawith the establishabout hothey also
Findings
The followere ide
EMERGENCY
Legal framewincoming int
Develo
eorgia repos during pa
ntegration odness to recill be intere
ould need imation change
ally, Georgiconcept of
hed on the ost nation so ratified the
by HNS top
owing table ntified duri
Y PLANNING
work applicaternational a
oped by EU-fundean
orted, withoast operatioof internatioceive internesting to unmprovemene consider a
ia reports tf host nationbasis of theupport. Gee Istanbul C
pics
summarizeng the rese
G
able for assistance
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
out any furtons as regaronal assistanational assderstand wt in their exand therefo
hat the civin support ine National Rorgia repor
Convention
es all measearch.
LegislatioNumerouwithin the
1. Law oand M
promotinand respo
2. Natio26 Au
describingauthoritiethem. Ondiplomati
3. MinisFacili
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
ther clarificrds internalance into thsistance an
what they thxisting systere will rectif
il protectionn general. AResponse Prts to followon tempora
ures ensuri
n specificallyus aspects of e following p
on ProtectinManmade Em
g a unified sonse.
onal Responugust 2008
g 17 functiones responsibe function isic protocol a
stry of Finanitation of cus
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
ation or del decision m
he emergenaverage 4 o
hink functioem, as well ify the ident
n / disasterAlso, the coPlan enablesw NATO andary admissi
ing host na
y targeting Hhost nation
pieces of legi
g the Populamergency Sit
ystem for pr
nse Plan on m
ns of emergele in each ans specifically nd internatio
nce order nr. stom declara
Response to Manast)
tail, to havmaking and ncy operatioout of 5 in tned and / oas whether
tified shortc
r managemeoperation as other sectd UN guidelon.
tion suppo
HNS does notsupport, howslation:
ation and Tetuations, of
revention, m
man-made a
ency managend the coope
dedicated toonal humani
106 as of 18ations and a
n-made
ve experienccooperatio
ons, they rathe questioor functionsr the currencomings, if a
ent sector iacross sectotors to havlines in prin
ort in Georg
t exist for thewever, are c
erritory from2007
mitigation, pre
and natural d
ement, includeration links o the provisiitarian aid.
8 February 2approval of in
27
ced some on as well ated their onnaire. It s well and nt process any.
is familiar ors that is ve an idea nciple and
gia, which
e moment. overed
m Natural
eparedness
disasters of
ding the between on of
010 on the nstructions””
28
Institutional
Develo
l, decision m
oped by EU-fundean
making,
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
introducin
4. Memthe fanotes
setting up
5. BilateIsraelUkrai
6. InternpledgINSAR
Though itsigned the
- AgreeCoopeemergman-
- Additnetwo
- AgreeParticand e
In additioPartner coProgrammEmergencapparentleven gap response
Equally, thon free mregions ofcase how being sen
The Crisis
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
ng templates
morandum ofacilitation ofs, it is not leg
p a framewo
eral disasterl, Jordan, Kazine.
national agrged to are: IsRAG Guidelin
t was not spee following a
ement amoneration (BSE
rgency assist-made disast
tional Protocork of liaison
ement on cocipating Statelimination o
on, accordingountries devme, the Regucy Situationsly addressesanalysis. It hand thus ind
he Law on thmovement ma
f Abkhazia athese restric
nt to the abov
s Manageme
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
s for custom
f Understandf vital cross-bgally binding
rk for host n
r relief agreezakhstan, Ru
reements / gstanbul Convnes,
ecifically repoagreements:
ng the GoverEC) Participatance and emters, signed o
col to the abn officers, sig
ooperation ates in the fieof their effec
g to the geneveloped withulation on ths may also haresponse ca
has also refedirectly to HN
he Occupieday affect incond South Osctions are cove regions.
ent Governm
Response to Manast)
s clearance o
ding betweenborder trans)
ation suppo
ements with ussian Federa
guidelines Gevention on te
orted, Georg
rnments of thting States o
mergency reson 15 April 1
bove agreemgned on 20 O
mong the Goeld of prevencts, signed on
eral analysis oin the frame
he Rules for Cave an affect
apacities, andrence to crosNS.
d Territories, oming assistsetia. The qunsidered in c
mental Comm
n-made
of incoming
n Georgia ansport (thoug
rt for NATO
Azerbaijan, ation, Turkm
eorgia has siemporary ad
gia seems to
the Black Seaon collaborasponse to na1998
ment on estabOctober 200
overnmentsntion of emen 4 July 2003
of legislationework of the Classificationt on HNS as d therefore, ss-border em
envisaging rtance in the buestion remacase of intern
mission is the
assistance.
nd NATO onh, Georgia
operations
Armenia, menistan and
gned up / dmission, UN
have also
a Economic ation in atural and
blishing a 05
of GUUAM rgencies 3
n in the
n of the it maybe,
mergencies /
restrictions breakaway ains in this national aid
e political /
N
/
administratimanagemento incomingassistance
Risk assessm(risks v. avai
Develo
ive and infornt structuresg internationa
ment and gapilable resour
oped by EU-fundean
rmation s in relation al
p analysis rces)
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
strategic drelevant minternatioManagem
The role oassistancerelation to
The Emerof Internadirect reliUN/OCHA
Once the Interagenwhich comappropriainformatireceipt andivided inlogistics a
The Field for direct liaison grothe field, decision m
Other autincoming Response
- Treas
- TEc
- Tin
-
This HNS questions
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
decision makministers. It onal assistanment Interage
of the Natione, incoming fo the Govern
rgency Manaal Affairs is thief operationA, NATO/EAD
National Resncy Operativmprises of reate on ad-hoon, coordinand distributionto four sectand finance.
Operations managemen
oup to ensurand an infor
makers and t
thorities thatinternationa
e Plan, are:
he Ministry egards the ressistance.
he Communconomic Dev
he Ministry ncoming hum
area was ints have not ye
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
king body in is responsiblce, based onency Operat
nal Security Cforeign aid &nmental Com
agement Dephe primary rns. It is also tDRCC and EU
sponse Planve Centre is sepresentativc basis. This
ates the inteon of internaors: operatio
Centre functnt of the intere communicrmation grouthe public.
t may have ral assistance
of Foreign Aequest for in
nications andvelopment, a
of Finance, emanitarian as
troduced onlet been answ
Response to Manast)
case of a dise also to dec
n the proposive Centre (s
Council as re& distributionmmission is st
partment (Eesponsible bhe designate
U/ERC.
is activated,set up at the es of other sCentre analyrvention andational assistons, informat
tions as the oervention. It cation in betwup to process
responsibiliti, as implied
Affairs, impleternational h
d IT Departmadvising on t
ensuring cusssistance
y for the intewered by Geo
n-made
saster, compcide on any r
sal of the Crissee further b
egards the ren of responsitill to be clar
MD) within tbody at natioed contact p
, the Crisis M headquarte
sectors inviteyzes and prod is responsibtance. Its acttion manage
on-site commhas, amongs
tween the res field inform
es in connecby the by th
ementing all humanitaria
ment of the Mthe use of ICT
stoms clearan
erviews and orgia.
29
prising of request for sis below).
equest for ibilities in rified.
the Ministry onal level to oint for
Managementers of EMD, ed as ocesses ble for the tivities are ement,
mand centrest others, a sponders on
mation to the
ction with e National
decisions asn
Ministry of T
nce for
therefore
t
e
n e
30
Standardizemethodologsituation anpopulation
EMERGENCY
Accurate anneeds assess
Use of existiinternationa
Coordinatiodeal with incassistance
Develo
d needs assegy to assess td needs of t
Y MANAGEM
d timely situsment
ing templateal assistance
n structure icoming inter
oped by EU-fundean
essment the he
MENT
uation and
e to request
n place to rnational
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
Outstandi
Has Georgchecked a
Not consi
Needs ass
Responsiband the F
Outstandi
As there iswould be How are tand event
DependinUN/OCHA
Based on Centre, threquestinMinistry ohumanitaand EU/E
Outstandi
At this staof Foreignresponsibdistributeassistance
In princip
As regard
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
ding question
gia done riskagainst ident
dered
sessment is t
bility of EMDield Operatio
ding question
is no standarinteresting t
the assessmetually in the
ng on the addA forms are u
the advice ohe Crisis Manng internatioof Foreign Afarian aid, whRC.
ding question
age it is unclen Affairs. It isbilities of EMed in relatione.
al, Georgia h
ds the integra
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
ns:
k assessmenttified risks? If
the responsi
D, supposedlyons Centres.
n:
rd needs asseto understanent results ferequest for i
dressee of thused in princ
of the Crisis Mnagement Gonal assistancffairs to activile the EMD
n:
ear which chs also to be cD and the M
n to requestin
has expresse
ation of inter
Response to Manast)
t? Have all-tif yes, details
bility of EMD
y through th
essment metnd how assesed into the deinternational
he request; Nciple.
Managemenovernmentalce. It is then tvate the chancontacts UN
hannels are aclarified how
Ministry of Forng and coord
d preference
rnational ass
n-made
ime resources on methodo
D; done on a
he local branc
thodology is ssment is comecision makil assistance?
NATO/EADRC
nt Interagencl Commissionthe responsnnels to rece
N/OCHA, NAT
activated by w the roles an
reign Affairsdinating inte
e for bilatera
sistance with
es been ever ology.
d-hoc basis.
ches of EMD
in place, it mpleted. ing chain ?
CC,
cy Operative n decides onibility of the eive TO/EADRCC
the Ministrynd are rnational
al assistance
h the
D
y
.
LOGISTICS A
Waive visa rvisas for ent
Waive custofor donated (incl. vehicle
Inspection adocumentatreduced / w
Barriers to ttransit and uare reduced
Barriers to ttransit and umedical equ
Develo
AND TRANSP
requirementstry, exit and t
oms duties, tgoods and e
es) of incomi
and administtion requirem
waived
he import / euse of ICT eq
he import / euse of medicuipment are r
oped by EU-fundean
PORT
s or grant transit
axes, tariffs equipment ng teams
rative / ments are
export, quipment
export, cation and reduced
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
national coperatingManagemthe operalarge scalcoordinatan OSOCC
On the otwhich, in internatioare formeregulated
Yes, accor
Yes, accor
Based onchanges tspecial foteams.
Outstandi
It would bis and hoincoming
Yes.
Presumab
Reported
It is uncleapplicable
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
coordinationg proceduresment Interageative coordine disaster, Gtion providedC or any OSO
ther hand, thprinciple, co
onal relief teed, whether td and if the m
rding to MoU
rding to MoU
n the MoU to custom r
orms in place
ding question
be interestinow they redteams?
bly according
ly yes.
ear how this ie for aid in th
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
n structures, s seems to beency Operat
nation of incoGeorgia would by the inte
OCC-like struc
he Field Operould also servams. It remathe roles and
members hav
U with NATO
U with NATO
with NATOregulations. e to facilitate
n:
g to understduce admini
g to MoU wit
is regulated.he form of m
Response to Manast)
no legal frame in place. Idive Centre poming internd, however,
ernational cocture.
ration Centreve for the coains a questiod responsibilive received a
O
O
O, the MiniThe Ministr
e the border
tand what thistrative req
th NATO
What are thmedication / m
n-made
mework or adeally, the Crprovides the national aid.
rather rely oommunity in
es have liaisoommunicatioon, how theslities are cleaany task-spec
stry of Ecory of Econocrossing of
he content ofquirements /
he special promedical equ
31
ny standard risis platform for In case of a on the the form of
on groups, on with the se groups arly cific training.
onomy mademy also hasinternationa
f these forms/ burden on
ovisions ipment vis-
.
e s
al
s n
32
Reduce barrexport, trandogs
Re-exportatsearch dogs,goods, even
Ensuring appsafety of intpersonnel, trelief consig
Provision of logistic supppersonnel, ttransport, et
Provision of commoditieelectricity, e
Provision of
LEGAL AND
Recognize pqualificationinternationa
Recognize thpersonnel of
Develo
riers to the imsit and use o
ion of equip, vehicles) an if donated i
propriate secernational reheir equipm
gnments
administratport (office, aranslation, etc.)
subsistences (food, wat
etc.)
medical sup
FINANCIAL I
rofessional ns and certifial relief perso
he legal statuf assisting in
oped by EU-fundean
mport / of search
ment (incl. nd unused s permitted
curity and elief ent and
ive and admin. equipment,
er, lodging,
pport
ISSUES
cates of onnel
us of ternational
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
à-vis “nor
Yes, thougwithout fu
Outstandi
The naturclarified.
Yes
Security is
Administrinland trasupport.
In principfor 1-3 daare specifto providewhether f
The EMD,responsib
No inform
Qualificatrepresent
Outstandi
What are
Reported
Georgia r
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
rmal” import
gh quarantinurther inform
ding question
re of the app
s assumed b
rative and ofansport woul
le, Georgia eays. It is also fied before Ge lodging, wafree of charg
, in close cooble for arrang
mation receiv
tions of foreitatives of the
ding question
e the applicab
ly yes, no inf
eports to ha
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
t of the same
ne requirememation.
n:
plicable quara
y the host na
ffice supportld also be av
expects disasexpected th
Georgia givesater and fue
ge or against
operation wiging all items
ved
ign doctors ae Ministry of
n:
ble criteria fo
formation on
ve establishe
Response to Manast)
e substances
ents are repo
antine requir
ation.
t as well as trailable, but n
ster relief teaat the needs
s clearance. Yl; it is, howevpayment.
th the Minists needed by
are checked af Health.
or medical st
n details.
ed a list of el
n-made
s?
ortedly resp
rements is st
ranslation seno technical
ams to be ses of internatiYet, it may sver, not spec
stry of Financthe internat
at entry by t
taff, if any?
ligible assist
ected,
till to be
ervices and or ITC
elf-sufficient ional teams till be able cified
ce is tional teams
the
ing actors
.
actors
Consider issdamage cau
6.5 Mo
Understaanswerinrelevant could be open.
In principcountries
Overall f
While it support-been conplace.
The syste2008 as requesteconsequehost nati
While Mthey ratequestionframewo
Develo
ues of liabilitsed by relief
oldova
anding the ng the ques
legislation conducted
ple, Moldovs, the Europ
findings
cannot be related pro
nsidered an
em could bwell as in
ed and recence managon support
oldova did ed their prenaire. With
ork for bord
oped by EU-fundean
ty for f personnel
benefits, Mstionnaire a
for furtherwith the M
va agrees tpean Comm
said that hovisions do
d fundame
be tested du2010 and tceived. In gement fiel related pro
not report paredness
hout any fuder crossing
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
and this lion the listhand, Geointernatiolist is in wexists onl
Foreign dmiscondu
Moldova coand the reqr study. Du
Moldavian au
to share thission and t
host nationexist in natntal legal p
uring somethe 2009 ga
addition, ld exercise, ocedures w
to have expto receive irther detaig and stora
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
ist is considet all offers arorgia reportsonal actors (Q
written formay in practice
octors are guct, but supp
ooperated quest for clue to time uthorities, t
he findingsthe Particip
n support istional legislarovisions as
relatively as explosionMoldova organized
ere also ver
perienced anternational, they reas
age capacity
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
ered eliminatre denied (Qs to accept aQuestionnairat available f.
ranted immuposedly they
throughouarificationsconstraints
therefore so
included inating States
s conceptuaation and ps well as ins
recent emen, when inthosted thein partnersrified.
any major pal assistancsoned this y for incom
Response to Manast)
tory in the seQuestionnaire
ssistance frore 5.1). It is afor all author
unity in case retain privat
t the procas well as
s, however, ome minor q
n this Studys of the Mec
alized in Mpractices. Mstitutional s
ergencies, sternational e “Codrii 2hip with NA
problem dure an averagmark by iss
ming assista
n-made
ense that froe 5.2). On thom most typalso unclear rities involve
of professiote liability.
cess of reses providing no direct
questions st
y with othechanism.
Moldova, hoMany HNS a
structures a
such as the assistance
2011” inteATO/EADRC
ring past opge 3.5 out osues about
ance availab
33
om those note other es of whether this
ed in HNS or
onal
earch, by pieces of interview
till remain
er Partner
ost nation reas have
are also in
floods in was also
ernational CC, where
perations, of 5 in the
the legal ble in the
t
s
34
affected 2011” ccooperat
Additionawith therelevant of the gtransport
Findings
The followere ide
EMERGENCY
Legal framewincoming int
Develo
area. On thcould provition proced
ally, Moldoe concept o
provisions guidelines wt. In additio
by HNS top
owing table ntified duri
Y PLANNING
work applicaternational a
oped by EU-fundean
he other haide an exures.
va reports tof host natof bilateral
within the on, Moldova
pics
summarizeng the rese
G
able for assistance
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
and, the prcellent ins
that the civtion suppor agreementNATO Me
a is party to
es all measuearch.
Numeroufollowing
1. AgreeMoldimporto graSepte
being primcrossing a
2. BR
3. Laof
covering passistance
4. GR
stipulatinaid under
5. GIn
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
reparation fsight into
vil protectiort in generts on mutumorandum
o the Istanb
ures ensuri
us aspects of pieces of leg
ement betwedova and the
rt, expert anant aid in disember 1999,
marily applicand customs
Bilateral agreRomania, Rus
aw nr. 1491 ffered to Mo
provisions foe, including a
Government Regulation on
g the implemr point 3 abo
Government nterdepartm
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
for and thehost natio
on / disasterral, which al disaster of Undersul Conventi
ng host nat
host nation gislation:
een the Gove United Natind transit of saster and e
cable for UN procedures
eements witssia and Ukra
of 28 Novemoldova,
or the entry aassistance pr
Decision nr. n humanitar
menting meaove.
Decision nr. mental Comm
Response to Manast)
conductionon support
r managemalso entailsrelief and tstanding onon on temp
tion suppor
support are
ernment of tions on meahumanitariamergency si
operations a.
h Austria, Beaine
mber 2002 on
and distributrovided in co
663 of 03 Jurian aid offer
asures of the
653 of 02 Jumission for H
n-made
n of exercist and inte
ent sector is the applithe acknown vital croporary adm
rt in Moldo
covered wit
the Republicasures to spean personneituations, sig
and covering
elarus, Bulga
n humanitar
tion of humaonnection wi
une 2003 appred to Moldo
e law on hum
une 2003 on Humanitarian
se “Codrii ernational
is familiar cation of ledgment ss-border ission.
va, which
thin the
c of eed up the el and assetsgned on 17
g border
ria,
rian aid
anitarian ith disasters.
proving the ova
manitarian
the n Aid
s
.
Develooped by EU-fundeaned Programme fornd Natural Disaste
setting upensure thinformatithat are passistance
6. Gmh
regulatingbodies of assessme
7. Gemp
establishidefining ewell as seemergenc
Issues stil
Though thby the Monational lassistance
- La
- Lasi
It is still tolaws may
In additio
- AoSt
- Acote19
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
p the Interdehe effective don channel i
prohibited toe is also anne
Government model regula
umanitarian
g the roles athe Commis
ent and the d
Government mergency siresenting inf
ng a uniformemergency aetting informcies.
ll to be clarif
he followingoldavian autegislation the, such as:
aw no. 212 o
aw no 93 of ituations ser
o be investigy be relevant
on, Moldova
Agreement other emergetates, signed
Agreement oonsequencesechnological993
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
epartmental distribution on between d
o be transporexed to this
decision nr. ation of the tn aid,
nd responsibssion for Humdistribution o
decision nr. ituation classformation in
m methodoloareas and ear
ation manag
fied:
s were not shorities, the
hat may have
of 2004 on th
2007 on thervice
gated to howto HNS.
has also sign
n mutual assencies of thed on 30 May
n cooperatios of emergenl nature of th
Response to Manast)
Commissionof humanitardonors and rrted in Molddecision.
1148 of 22 Sterritorial co
bilities of themanitarian Aof aid.
1076 of 16 Nsification ann case of em
ogy to assessrly warning ogement struc
pecifically mre seem to b
e affect on in
he state of e
e civil protect
much exten
ned the
sistance in ce Member Stay 2002.
on in prevenncy situationhe CIS count
n-made
n for Humanirian aid and trecipients. A ova as huma
September 2ommissions f
e territorial (Aid in terms o
November 20nd on collect
mergency situ
s emergency of the populactures for th
mentioned anbe two morencoming inte
emergency
tion and em
nt any provisi
case of accidtates of Indep
ntion and liquns of naturaltries signed o
35
itarian Aid tothe list of goods
anitarian
2003 on for
regional) of needs
010 on ting and uations
situations, ations as e events of
nd provided pieces of rnational
mergency
ion of these
dents and pendent
uidation of l and on 22 Jan
o
s
36
Institutionaladministratimanagemento incomingassistance
Risk assessm(risks v. avai
Develo
l, decision mive and infornt structuresg internationa
ment and gapilable resour
oped by EU-fundean
making, rmation s in relation al
p analysis rces)
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
- Athina
In relationunderstan
? w
? ifaa
The Servicwithin theand submthe imminand / or e
The Commbody to dcontact wreceived. situation
Other bodcoordinat
- Ta as
- Tadd
- Em
This HNS questions
Outstandi
Has Moldchecked a
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
Agreement ahe Black Sean emergency
and man-mad
n to the abovnd
which HNS ar
f any regionagreements (ctivated for
ice of Civil Pre Ministry of
mit informationent threat teliminate the
mission for Hdecide on thewith internati
Its territoriaon site and d
dies that mation of intern
he Ministry role in the cssistance an
he Specializedvising on thevices
Emergency Si
area was ints have not ye
ding question
dova done risagainst ident
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
mong the Goa Economic Cy assistance de disasters,
ve agreemen
reas are cove
al operation hi.e. has any oany emergen
rotection andf the Interioron to the Gothereof as we consequen
Humanitariae acceptanceional donorsal commissiodistributing a
y have an efnational assis
of Labour, Scoordinationd in needs as
ed Commissihe import of
ituations Com
troduced onlet been answ
ns:
sk assessmentified risks? If
Response to Manast)
overnments Cooperation and emerge, signed on 1
nts, it would
ered in this ag
has ever beeof these agrency?)
d Emergencyr is responsibovernment abell as for all ces of disast
an Aid is the e of internati and to distr
ons have a graid locally.
fect on the mstance are
ocial Protectand distribu
ssessment
ion of the Mmedicines, m
mmission
y for the intewered by Mol
nt? Have all-tf yes, details
n-made
of member (BSEC) on co
ency respons15 April 1998
still be intere
greement, if
en based on teements eve
y Situations ble to collectbout any emmeasures to
ters.
primarily resional aid, to ribute the goreat role in a
managemen
ction and Famution of inter
Ministry of Hemedical supp
erviews and ldova.
time resourcs on methodo
countries ofollaborationse to natural8.
esting to
f any.
these r been
(SCPES) t, compile
mergency or o prevent
sponsible maintain
oods assessing the
t and
mily, having rnational
ealth, plies and
therefore
ces been everology.
f
l
e
r
Standardizemethodologsituation anpopulation
EMERGENCY
Accurate anneeds assess
Develo
d needs assegy to assess td needs of t
Y MANAGEM
d timely situsment
oped by EU-fundean
essment the he
MENT
uation and
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
The Goveclassificatemergencemergencthe basis and by tyassess thenot exist,
Situation Moldova,affected rinformatiService ofcollectingof the em
By law, inwithin matimes per
The assesprinciple, not sufficshall be re
Outstandi
The analythat the edata on lodivision of
Is there anresponsibthe decisi
The role odisaster a
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
ernment decition and on cy situationscy situationsof the numbpe / cause. Oe needs of efas reported
and needs a, with the terregion havinon on humaf Civil Protec
g and processmergency and
nformation oax. 30 minutr day.
ssment of av i.e. once it iient, the higequested for
ding issues:
ysis of legislaestimation ofosses is direc
of the Service
ny coordinatble for disasteion making c
of the Ministassessment p
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
ision nr. 107collecting ans establishes. It classifies
ber of effecteOn the otherffected indiv.
assessment isrritorial humg the primarnitarian nee
ction and Emsing informad related ope
n any emerges and progr
ailable resous clear that ther level comr further assi
ation complef damages frctly managede of Civil Prot
tion mechaner assessmen
chain?
ry of Labour,phase is still t
Response to Manast)
76 on emergend presentina uniform mthe emerge
ed populatior hand, methviduals and /
s reportedly manitarian aidry responsibids of the popergency Sitution as regar
erations.
ging disaster ress reports s
urces seems the resourcemmission foristance.
ted under throm the disasd at central ltection and E
ism in place nt? How is th
, Social proteto be clarifie
n-made
ency situationg informatiomethodologyencies by magon and territohodology on
or commun
a multi-agend commissioility to collecpulation, wh
uations concerds the over
shall be proshall follow
to follow thees at the lowr emergency
his Programmster and the level by a dedEmergency Si
between all he collected
ection and Faed.
37
on on in case of
y to assess gnitude on orial reach how to ities does
ncy task in n of the
ct hile the entrates on all situation
cessed at least 2
e “cascade” er level are
y situation
me states collection of
dicated ituations.
services data fed into
amily in the
f
f
o
38
Use of existiinternationa
Coordinatiodeal with incassistance
LOGISTICS A
Waive visa rvisas for ent
Waive custofor donated (incl. vehicle
Inspection adocumentatreduced / w
Develo
ing templateal assistance
n structure icoming inter
AND TRANSP
requirementstry, exit and t
oms duties, tgoods and e
es) of incomi
and administtion requirem
waived
oped by EU-fundean
e to request
n place to rnational
PORT
s or grant transit
axes, tariffs equipment ng teams
rative / ments are
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
No
The Goveassistancemechanisaddition, accept intresponsibcases proone respostandard services t
The overaEmergenclevels and
As regardnational coperatingpractice tteams acc
Outstandi
Does Molofficer? Ware their r
Yes
Yes
SimplifiedAgreemenNations tpersonnecovers UNfollow thiapplied fo
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
ernment decie, but Moldosm in place reno single auternational able body on aoved it, this aonsible for dcoordinationo cover for t
all coordinatcy Situationsd having its m
ds the integracoordinationg procedure to appoint a cording to th
ding question
ldova have aWhat are the roles? Do the
d border crosnt between
to speed up tel and assetsN operationsis practice. Itor third-coun
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
ides on any eova reports tegarding howthority is de
assistance, ba case-by-casappointed auirecting the dn mechanismthe possible
ion of disasts Commissionmembers fro
ation of intern structures, is in place. Oliaison office
he INSARAG G
n:
a pool of expeconditions t
ey receive an
ssing procedthe Republicthe import, e in disaster a
s. Most probt is unclear, hntry consignm
Response to Manast)
eventual reqo have no esw this decisiosignated to sut the Goverse basis. In pthority may disaster relie
ms are in placgap in inform
er managemn, organized
om different
rnational assno legal fram
On the other er for the incGuidelines.
erts to take uto be appointny specific tra
ures are appc of Moldovaexport and trand emergenably the bilahowever, if tments. While
n-made
quest for intestablished coon is reachesubmit the rrnment appo
principle, as pnot be the s
ef operationsce in betweemation mana
ment is ensur on differentpublic autho
sistance withmework or ahand, it is a
coming inter
up the role ofted liaison ofaining to this
plied accordia and the Untransit of humncy situationteral agreem
the same proe Moldova h
ernational oordination d. In equest and oints the previous same as the s and no
en any two agement.
red by the t territorial orities.
h the ny standard functioning national
of liaison fficer? Whats end?
ng to the nited manitarian ns, which
ments also ovision is as reported
t
Barriers to ttransit and uare reduced
Barriers to ttransit and umedical equ
Reduce barrexport, trandogs
Re-exportatsearch dogs,goods, even
Ensuring appsafety of int
Develo
he import / euse of ICT eq
he import / euse of medicuipment are r
riers to the imsit and use o
ion of equip, vehicles) an if donated i
propriate secernational re
oped by EU-fundean
export, quipment
export, cation and reduced
mport / of search
ment (incl. nd unused s permitted
curity and elief
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
a general on humancustom cospecified)
Standardcrossing /outgoing further st
Adequateand SAR d
The AgreeMoldova with ICT eoperation
Medicinemonths cafrom whicand Sociaas human
Outstandi
It is uncleemergencinterventi
SAR dogs assistanceprovided concerninwith veteexaminatcommon
Yes
Security is
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
application nitarian assiontrols are p), providing c
forms are re/ immigratiorelief teams
tudy.)
e certificatesdogs.
ement betwand the Uni
equipment an as listed in
s and medican in principch rule derog
al Security. Thnitarian aid is
ding question
ear, however,cy medicatioion teams.
are reportede” as specifieto Moldova
ng expeditiouerinary certifi
ions cannot practice.
s assumed b
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
of this rule iistance provperformed inclearance for
eportedly estn and custom / consignme
are request
ween the Govited Nationss equipmentthe Agreem
al supplies wple be importgation can bhe law also ss subject to q
n:
, whether thon as part of
dly fall undeed in Law nr.
a and therefous entry appicates and inbe excluded
y the host na
Response to Manast)
n the questioided to Mold accordance
r humanitari
tablished to ms procedurents. (No for
ed in case of
vernment of grants free
t of the disasent.
with expiratioted with adee given by thstipulates thaquality contr
e above rulethe equipme
r the term “h. 1491 on hu
ore the abovely. They have case of nee before entr
ation, while
n-made
onnaire, Lawdova stipula
e with existinan aid as pri
facilitate bores for incomrms were pro
f imported m
the Republicand expeditster relief tea
on date withequate certifhe Ministry oat medicinesrol before dis
e would also ent of foreign
humanitariaumanitarian e mentionede to be acco
ed, additionary, though th
incoming fo
39
w nr. 1491 tes that
ng laws (not ority.
rder ming / ovided for
medication
c of ious entry ams in a UN
in 12 icates only, of Health s imported stribution.
apply to n
n assistance
d provisions mpanied l
his is not
reign teams
40
personnel, trelief consig
Provision of logistic supppersonnel, ttransport, et
Provision of commoditieelectricity, e
Provision of
LEGAL AND
Recognize pqualificationinternationa
Recognize thpersonnel ofactors
Develo
heir equipmgnments
administratport (office, aranslation, etc.)
subsistences (food, wat
etc.)
medical sup
FINANCIAL I
rofessional ns and certifial relief perso
he legal statuf assisting in
oped by EU-fundean
ent and
ive and admin. equipment,
er, lodging,
pport
ISSUES
cates of onnel
us of ternational
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
are expec
Administrinland trasupport.
In principfor 3-7 dafood, elec
Most of tarranged Emergencand bank
Yes, again
No inform
The AgreeMoldova following
- re
- U
- P
- In
- M
- Fo
- U
This Agrecrossing aother mesuccess oof bank ac
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
cted to ensur
rative and ofansport are a
le, Moldova ays. Yet, it cactricity and f
he above serfor through
cy Situationscards are th
nst payment
mation receiv
ement betwand the Uni categories o
epresentativ
UN experts on
ersonnel ass
nternational
Medical team
oreign milita
UN assessme
ement stipuand custom casures relatef disaster reccounts, ent
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
re own safet
ffice supportavailable free
expects disaan provide louel against p
rvices and coprivate com
s Service. In che accepted p
.
ved; the resp
ween the Govited Nationsof assisting p
ves of the UN
n mission
sisting refuge
SAR teams
ms
ary, civil defe
nt and coord
lates some pclearance pred to personlief missionstering into co
Response to Manast)
y measure fo
t as well as tre of charge, b
aster relief tedging and w
payment.
ommodities apanies by th
case of contrpayment me
onder was u
vernment of mentioned
personnel in a
N
ees and disp
ence and civi
dination team
provisions onocedures, bual status, wh(such as for
ontract witho
n-made
or their oper
ranslation sebut no techn
eams to be swater free of
are providedhe Civil Proteracts for valuethods.
unaware of th
the Republicabove recoga UN operat
laced people
il protection
m
n expeditiousut does not phich may affer e.g. VAT staout address,
rations.
ervices and nical or ITC
self-sufficientcharge,
d or ection and ue, the cash
his issue.
c of gnizes the ion:
e
teams
s border provide for ect the
atus, opening etc.). The
t
g
Consider issdamage cau
6.6 Uk
The infoprovidedcertain eit impossopen at t
In principcountries
Overall f
Though Ulaws seeassistancfunctioniassistancJune 200Europeanalso addr
In the serelated pexact exp
Develo
ues of liabilitsed by relief
kraine
rmation red in responsextent. In adsible to orgathis point.
ple, Ukrains, the Europ
findings
Ukraine doeem to covece. On the ing of the ce in the for08 for then Civil Proteressed the i
lf-assessmepreparedneplanation. I
oped by EU-fundean
ty for f personnel
eceived fromse to the reddition, the anize interv
e agrees topean Comm
es not haveer the mos
other handexisting p
rm of in-kin floods affection Mecissues of inc
ent exercisess an averan addition,
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
Agreemenjurisdictiopersonne
In additioRepublic oof humanentities thapplicableexcept fo
No inform
m Ukraine equest for c
civil unrestviews in Kiev
o share theission and t
a specific ht importand, in recen
provisions bnd assets anfecting six hanism orgcoming fore
e included inge 4 pointsUkraine do
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
nt also expreon or any priel on the basi
on, Law nr. 1of Moldova,
nitarian aid”,hat provide he. But still, wr the border
mation receiv
in the queclarificationt and the pov. Therefore
e findings ithe Particip
host nation nt aspects ant years nobe verified nd teams w
regions, wganized by teign aid.
n the onlines out of 5, woes not repo
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
esses explicitvilege is granis of this Agr
491 on hum, in its gener these being
humanitarianwithout provir crossing and
ved; the resp
estionnaire n cleared tholitical situa
e, a significa
included in ating States
support syaffecting in
ot many ocunder rea
ith special ewhile the Ithe PPRD Ea
e-questionnwhich ratingort any majo
Response to Manast)
tly that no imnted to the aeement.
anitarian asal provisions
g all foreign in assistance,sions affectid customs-re
onder was u
was limitehe outstandation duringant amount
this Studys of the Mec
stem estabncoming focasions hav
al circumstaequipment nteragencyast Program
naire Ukraing has been or problem
n-made
mmunity fromabove menti
ssistance pros, specifies thndividuals o, for which thing their legaelated provis
unaware of th
ed and theding issues g spring 20t of question
y with othechanism.
blished, its roreign disasve allowedances. Intewas last pr
y Workshopmme in Janu
ne has ratedsubstantiat encounter
41
m oned
ovided to thehe “donors r legal his law is al status, sions.
his issue.
e answers only to a
014, made ns remain
er Partner
respective ster relief
that the ernational rovided in p on the uary 2012
d its HNS-ted by no ed during
e
42
the functrelativelywhich HNexisting s
In princiconcept internatiUnderstaappropri
Findings
The followere ide
EMERGENCY
Legal framewincoming int
Develo
tioning of ty limited reNS area, Uksystem.
ple, Ukrainof host naonal reco
anding on vate and on
by HNS top
owing tablentified duri
Y PLANNING
work applicaternational a
oped by EU-fundean
the existingal experien
kraine consi
ne’s civil pation suppommendatioital cross-boa case-by-c
pics
summarizeng the rese
G
able for assistance
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
g provisionsce. At this ders functio
rotection /ort, but it ons specifiorder trans
case basis.
es all measearch.
Numeroufollowing
7. Law n
being theand distri
8. CabintechnFebru
Establishicoordinat
9. BilateGeorgRussi
In additiodevelopedthat werephase. Th
- Lap
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
s, though itpoint, it wooning well a
/ disaster has not p
ically, excesport, which
ures ensuri
us aspects of pieces of leg
no. 1192-XIV
e primary soubution of hu
net of Ministnogenic and uary 1998
ng the permtion of activit
eral agreemgia, Hungarya, Slovakia, U
on, the analysd by the Pro
e not reportehese are the
aw on Emergrovisions on
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
t must be aould be benand what w
managemeledged to ept for t
h it consider
ing host na
host nation gislation:
V on Humani
urce of proviumanitarian a
ters Decree oecological s
manent centraties in conne
ents with Ary, KazakhstanUzbekistan
sis of legislatgramme, rev
ed in the que
gency Servic internationa
Response to Manast)
acknowledgneficial to uwould need
nt sector ithe applica
the NATO rs as a reco
tion suppo
support are
itarian Aid,
sions on the aid.
on the State afety an em
al level bodyection with e
menia, Azern, Lithuania,
tion in the Pavealed someestionnaire o
ces, which apal cooperatio
n-made
ged this is understand
improveme
is familiar ation of an
Memoranommendatio
ort in Ukrain
covered wit
of 22 Octob
reception, p
Commissionmergencies, o
y responsibleemergency si
baijan, BelarMoldova, Po
artner counte pieces of leor during the
pparently covon
based on what, i.e. ent in the
with the ny of the ndum of on, where
ne, which
thin the
er 1999,
processing,
n on of 16
e for the ituations.
rus, Estonia, oland,
tries gislation clarification
vers
n
Institutionaladministratimanagemento incomingassistance
Risk assessm(risks v. avai
Develo
l, decision mive and infornt structuresg internationa
ment and gapilable resour
oped by EU-fundean
making, rmation s in relation al
p analysis rces)
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
- a
It is still tointernatio
The Statebody that(as declarit is not clin relation
The Minisexecutive2013. It isduring emreceived. Emergenc
The Permsafety anin responthe territoquestion wcoordinatassistance
Other bodcoordinat
- Tin
- Tromcl
The Law owere not
Under devProtectionCommissi
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
nd the Code
o clarify howonal assistan
e Emergencyt implementsred in the anlear what then to host nat
stry of Sociae agency resps an outstandmergency ope
The coordinacy Service an
manent Statend emergenc
se to emergeorial units ofwhat the restion of activite?
dies that mation of intern
he Ministry nternational
he Ukrainianoles and resp
managementlarified.
on Emergencreported abo
velopment bn. Request foion at the en
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
of Civil Prot
w much thesence and host
y Service alsos the state pswers to thee more speciftion support.
l Policy is theponsible for ding questionerations andation mecha
nd Ministry of
e Commissioncies is responencies. It is af the civil prosponsibilitiesties and how
y have an efnational assis
of Foreign Aassistance
n Emergencyponsibilities at coordinatio
cy Services anout may clar
by the Scientor expert ass
nd of April 20
Response to Manast)
tection
e latter wouldnation suppo
o serves as tholicy in the f
e clarificationific responsib
e primary rehumanitarian how this re
d in case foreanism, if regu
f Social Polic
n on technognsible for cooalso the platfotection syst
of this bodyw it relates to
fect on the mstance are
Affairs, to iss
y Managemeas well as itsn / comman
nd the Civil Prify the above
tific and Resesistance was014.
n-made
d affect incoort.
he central exfield of socian request). Abilities of this
esponsible cen aid as of Fesponsibility eign assistanculated, betwecy is still to b
genic and ecordinating thform for inteem. It is an o
y entail in relo incoming in
managemen
ue request f
ent Centre, os place in thed structures
Protection Coe outstandin
earch Institus sent to the
43
ming
xecutive l protection
At this point s service are
entral ebruary manifests ce is een State e clarified.
cological he activities eraction of outstanding ation to
nternational
t and
for
of which e emergency
is still to be
ode, which ng questions.
te of Civil European
.
44
Standardizemethodologsituation anpopulation
EMERGENCY
Accurate anneeds assess
Use of existiinternationa
Coordinatiodeal with incassistance
Develo
d needs assegy to assess td needs of t
Y MANAGEM
d timely situsment
ing templateal assistance
n structure icoming inter
oped by EU-fundean
essment the he
MENT
uation and
e to request
n place to rnational
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
No specif
Situation Economiclocal exec
Outstandi
How is asresults arethe coordDevelopmauthoritie
Yes, NATO
The AdmiMinistersPermanenassistanceState Emeinternatiofor the divresponsib
The overaactivities members
As regardnational coperatingexpects thOSOCC wguidelinesManagemhowever,
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
ic informatio
and needs acal Developmcutive autho
ding question
ssessment dore fed into thdination mechment and Comes.
O/EADRCC fo
inistration ofs decide, on tnt State Come. In principlergency Servonal partnersvision of this
ble in which s
all strategic lis ensured b
s from differe
ds the integracoordinationg procedure shat in case o
will be establis. The OSOC
ment Centre. their exact r
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
on received.
assessment isment and Comrities (to be
ns:
one? It is alsoe decision mhanism betwmmerce and
orms to requ
f President othe basis of t
mmission, one, both the M
vice may be ds. It is an outs task? It is tosituation, if t
evel coordinby the Permaent public au
ation of intern structures, seems to be
of a larger scashed and funC shall then In addition, role remains
Response to Manast)
Most probab
s the responmmerce as wspecified).
o to specify hmaking chain,ween the Min
the emergen
uest internat
of Ukraine anthe recommethe request
Ministry of Fdesignated ttstanding quo clarify whichere is any d
nation of disanent State C
uthorities.
rnational assno legal framin place. On
ale internationction accordreport to theliaison office unclear and
n-made
bly not in pla
sibility of thewell as other
how the asse, especially anistry of Econncy managem
ional assista
nd the Cabinendation frot for internatForeign Affairo submit the
uestion what ch authority difference.
aster manageCommission,
sistance withmework or an the other honal relief opding to the Ie Emergencyers may also
d most proba
ace.
e Ministry of central and
essment as regards nomical ment
nce
et of om the tional rs and the e request forthe basis is is
ement having its
h the ny standard and, Ukraineperation an NSARAG y o be used; ably they do
f
r
e
LOGISTICS A
Waive visa rvisas for ent
Waive custofor donated (incl. vehicle
Inspection adocumentatreduced / w
Barriers to ttransit and uare reduced
Barriers to ttransit and umedical equ
Develo
AND TRANSP
requirementstry, exit and t
oms duties, tgoods and e
es) of incomi
and administtion requirem
waived
he import / euse of ICT eq
he import / euse of medicuipment are r
oped by EU-fundean
PORT
s or grant transit
axes, tariffs equipment ng teams
rative / ments are
export, quipment
export, cation and reduced
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
not under
Yes.
EU citizenUkraine. FassistanceGuard Ser
Yes. No fu
In principborder croutgoing
Accordinghumanitaradiologicsimplified
The StateMinistry oinformaticurrent le
In case ofInformatiinternatio
No specifconsidere
The Minisapprovinghow mucforms par
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
rgo any spec
ns and citizenFor team mee was approvrvice on dire
urther detail
le, no standaossing / immrelief teams
g to the Law arian aid are cal and envird customs cle
e Committee of Infrastructon and comm
egislation res
f need, the Son Protectio
onal relief te
fic informatioed.
stry of Healthg any offer ch time the drt of an incom
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
cific training
ns of PPRD Eembers of anved, visa wil
ect decree of
s (legal base
ard forms armigration / cu
/ consignme
on Humanitsubject to sa
ronmental chearance proc
for televisioture are respmunication tstricts the us
tate Service on can issue eams, if nece
on received,
hcare may bontaining emecision wouming disaste
Response to Manast)
before under
ast countriesny other counl be issued bthe Governm
, explanation
e introducedustoms proceents.
arian Aid, asanitary, veteheck-ups, frecedures are c
on and radio ponsible for ttechnology. Ie of foreign
of Special Coextra radio fssary.
most probab
e involved inmergency meld take, esper relief team
n-made
rtaking this r
s travel withntry, from w
by the Nationment.
n, etc.) recei
d so far to faedures for in
ssets importeerinary, phytoee of charge,completed.
broadcastingthe public usIt is unclear,ICT technolo
ommunicatiofrequencies f
bly the issue
n the processedication. It ecially if the
m.
45
role.
hout visa to which offerednal Border
ved.
cilitate ncoming /
ed as o-sanitary, before
g and the se of whether
ogy.
on and for
e is not
s of is unclear medication
d
46
Reduce barrexport, trandogs
Re-exportatsearch dogs,goods, even
Ensuring appsafety of intpersonnel, trelief consig
Provision of logistic supppersonnel, ttransport, et
Provision of commoditieelectricity, e
Provision of
LEGAL AND
Recognize pqualificationinternationa
Recognize thpersonnel ofactors
Consider issdamage cau
Develo
riers to the imsit and use o
ion of equip, vehicles) an if donated i
propriate secernational reheir equipm
gnments
administratport (office, aranslation, etc.)
subsistences (food, wat
etc.)
medical sup
FINANCIAL I
rofessional ns and certifial relief perso
he legal statuf assisting in
ues of liabilitsed by relief
oped by EU-fundean
mport / of search
ment (incl. nd unused s permitted
curity and elief ent and
ive and admin. equipment,
er, lodging,
pport
ISSUES
cates of onnel
us of ternational
ty for f personnel
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
All foreigncertificateentering acrossing. which, upcrossing p
Yes
Security isare expecduration o
Administrtranslatio
In principfor 3-7 daelectricitycommodi
Yes, but mwhether tcan be se
Yes, with
Is this an
The issue
Bilateral a
The host professioexcept fo
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
n SAR dogs se. Special quare only subj In addition,
pon exiting thpersonnel.
s assumed bcted to have of their oper
rative and ofon services an
le, Ukraine eays. Yet, it cay and fuel. Mities / service
medical insurthe cost of trttled also at
no additiona
established p
is most prob
agreements
nation undenal conduct r acts of gros
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
shall be equiparantine reqject to quickspecial form
he countries
y the host namedical insu
ration in Ukr
ffice supportnd inland tra
expects disasan provide lo
Modalities fores are still to
rance coverareatments haa later stage
al certificatio
practice or c
bably not co
usually cove
rtakes to covor misconduss negligence
Response to Manast)
pped with inquirements a
veterinary cms have to be
shall be sub
ation, while urance coveraine
t, including ICansport are a
ster relief teadging, food,
r the provisiobe clarified,
age is requesas yet to be ae.
on procedure
covered by le
nsidered.
r the issues
ver for the duct of the fore or for dam
n-made
nternational vare not appliechecks at boe filled for ea
bmitted to bo
incoming forage for the
CT support, aavailable free
ams to be se water as we
on of all thes if available.
sted. It is uncadvanced or
e.
egislation?
of liability.
amage causereign relief p
mage caused
veterinary ed, the dogsrder ach dog, order
reign teams entire
as well as e of charge.
elf-sufficient ell as e
clear medical bills
ed by personnel, deliberately.
s
.
Develooped by EU-fundeaned Programme fornd Natural Disaste
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
Response to Manast)
n-made
47
48
7 GE
The reseissues of of emergtheir abil
The follofurther im
In the na
Researchplans do comprehclearly damongst countries
Yet, all Pwhich sethe interdisastersonce the
The Partnthe follow
Leam
Itas
TPloAn
Develo
ENERAL CO
arch and thhost nation
gency operality to receiv
owing conclmprovemen
ational cont
h of previouexist in mo
hensive. In defined and various orgs is not obv
Partner couerves as a gr-institutions must have issues of h
ner countriwing areas:
essons learre sufficien
managemen
t is of outmssistance in
he value oroperly trai
ocal authoAdditionally,
ational HNS
oped by EU-fundean
ONCLUSIO
he foregoinn support. Iations incluve and hand
usions aimnt in the cur
text
us Programmost of the Pamany cased mandateganizationsious within
ntry have rood basis fal coordinae already eost nation s
es may, how
nt activitiesntly coveri
nt needs.
ost importanto the natio
of trained pined liaisonrities can , all trainingS trainers sh
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
ONS
ng analysis ht is hoped t
uding interndle such ass
to highlighrrent system
me activitieartner Couns roles and
es may ove within thethe current
rules and prfor any furtation structuestablished support are
wever, wish
s should focng the spe
ance to cononal coordi
personnel in officers tosort out
g opportunihould be co
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
have had ththat the Parnational asssistance.
ht all the pms.
es has showntries. On td responsiberlap. Equa countries otly existing
ractices in her progresures that arcooperatio
e to be cons
h to reflect
cus on whetecificities o
sider the mnation struc
n the field o act as link
many opities that pr
onsidered as
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
he potentiartner countsistance on
oints that m
wn that disahe other ha
bilities of inally, the fror for exterlegal and st
place that ss in this fiere to set-up
on links, whsidered as a
more and e
ther the indof a comp
modalities ofctures.
of host na between t
perationalrovide HNSs priority.
Response to Manast)
al to raise aries now agtheir territ
may need t
aster / emerand, they apndividual orramework frnal supportructural ar
pertain to held. Equallyp for the mahich may p
wider conc
eventually t
dividual, i.e. plex disaste
f how to int
ation suppohe internatproblems -related ed
n-made
awareness agree that thtory depen
to be consi
rgency manppear not trganizationfor mutua
rt from neigrrangement
host nationy, in many ianagementrove usefu
cept.
to further d
sector-speer scenario
tegrate inte
ort is indistional teambefore thucation to
about the he success d also on
dered for
nagement to be very s are not l support ghbouring s.
n support, nstances,
t of major l practice
develop in
cific rules o and its
ernational
pensable. s and the ey arise. would-be
In the reg
Despite tmanagemneighbouof civil pon paperthe disassystemat
It must potentialPartner can operavaluable develope
- ASt
- Asi
- ACna
- Ao
- Agof
In additionation su
Develo
gional cont
the cross-bment woulduring countrotection br and they mster has alrtic, with no
be acknowl to replacecountries mative than a
starting ped, if deems
greement ontates of Inde
greement ontuations of n
greement amooperation (atural and m
dditional Pron 20 Octobe
greement onf prevention
on, the orgaupport may
oped by EU-fundean
text
order natud require eries; there
between themay be actready occufocus on jo
wledged th insufficient
may wish to a political point. The vs necessary
n mutual assependent Sta
n cooperationatural and t
mong the Go(BSEC) on co
man-made dis
otocol to ther 2005
n cooperatio of emergen
anization ofprove to be
ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste
re of manyefficiently fuseem to bee Partner Civated only rred. Inform
oint prepara
at internatt national lerenew the
point of vieviability of , in view of
sistance in caates, signed o
on in preventtechnologica
overnments ollaboration isasters, sign
e above agre
on among thecies and elim
f regional ee of absolut
r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas
y prevailing unctioning e only a fewCountries. Iny in case of mation shaation.
tional arranegislation a existing co
ew. The foltheir prova more fun
ase of accideon 30 May 2
tion and liqual nature of t
of member cn emergencyed on 15 Ap
ement on es
e Governmemination of t
exercises ante added-va
Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea
disaster tyregional co
w establishen addition, an imminenring tends
ngements ind practice
onnections lowing agreisions shou
nctional regi
ents and othe002.
idation of cohe CIS count
countries of ty assistance ril 1998.
stablishing a
nts of GUUAtheir effects,
nd joint traialue.
Response to Manast)
ypes and thooperation, ed cooperatthese exist nt emergento be more
in the fields. In this resand consideeements muld be verifional coope
er emergenc
onsequencestries signed o
the Black Seaand emerge
network of l
AM Participatsigned on 4
nings targe
n-made
hat effective especially tion links int predominancy situatioe spontane
d of HNS spect, thereer them rat
may prove tofied and b
eration.
cies of the M
s of emergenon 22 Jan 19
a Economic ency respons
liaison office
ting States in July 2003
eting specifi
49
e disaster between
n the field antly only n or once
eous than
have the efore, the ther from o be of a e further
ember
ncy 93
e to
ers, signed
n the field
cally host
508 Thi
ela
con
cor
Leg
2 2 2 2
ANN
EX I
–
is ta
ble
sum
ma
abor
atio
n of
the
ntai
ns o
nly
the
rres
pond
s to
the
gend
for t
he b
elow
s
1 =
noY
= ye
0=
noB
= bi
CP =
yHN
=
€ =
ye
2.
Prio
r exp
e2.
1 H
as y
our c
inte
rnat
ion
2.3
Have
you
o(H
NS)
– re
2.5
Base
d on
pin
tern
atio
n•
Le
QU
ESTI
ON
NA
arize
s th
e an
swe
e St
udy,
the
refo
e m
ultip
le-c
hoic
e nu
mbe
rs c
onta
sum
mar
y ta
ble:
ot a
t all
/ poo
r es o
answ
er
ilate
ral
yes,
with
add
ition
aho
st n
atio
n es
, aga
inst
pay
men
erie
nce
in re
ques
tco
untr
y be
en a
ffena
l disa
ster
ass
istor
gani
zed
rece
ntl
late
d pr
oced
ures
pa
st e
xper
ienc
e(s
nal a
ssist
ance
? eg
al
AIRE
SU
MM
AR
ers
the
Part
ner
ore
this
tabl
e sh
ce q
uest
ions
; th
aine
d in
the
orig
2 =
not r
eally
/ N
= n
oP
= pa
rtia
llyM
= m
ultil
ater
al c
ertif
icat
ion
proc
eAN
= st
ate
send
t
ting
and
rece
ivin
gec
ted
by a
nat
ural
tanc
e w
as re
ques
ty
and
natio
nal /
iw
ere
also
test
ed),
how
do
you
ratRY
r co
untr
ies
gave
hall
alw
ays
be r
hose
req
uirin
g gi
nal q
uest
ionn
a
insu
ffici
ent
al edur
e in
pla
cedi
ng a
ssist
ance
g in
tern
atio
nal a
sl /
tech
nolo
gica
l dte
d an
d pr
ovid
ednt
erna
tiona
l exe
r /
verif
ied?
te
the
… p
repa
red
Civi
l Pro
tect
ion
Coop
er
e in
the
que
stio
read
tog
ethe
r w
desc
riptiv
e an
sire
.
3 =
enou
gh /
suffi
cN
K =
Do n
ot k
now
NA
= no
t app
licab
lN
P =
no p
refe
renc
0P =
no
prov
ision
iH&
A =
both
the
ho1/
3 =
1-3
days
ssis
tanc
e di
sast
er in
the
last
? rcise
whe
re h
ost n
dnes
s of y
our c
ounra
tion
for t
he C
andi
date
onna
ire.
Som
e d
with
the
cou
ntry
swer
s ar
e on
ly
cien
t 4
= w
ell /
U =
unc
ee e in
pla
ce
ost n
atio
n an
d th
e a
3/7
= 3-
7
t 10
year
s whe
re
natio
n su
ppor
t
ntry
to re
ceiv
e
e Co
untr
ies a
nd P
oten
tia
data
pre
sent
ed
y re
port
s in
Ch
incl
uded
in
th
/ goo
d5
= p
rtai
nN
C =
IV =
assis
ting
natio
n7
days
>7 =
Armenia
Azerbaijan
N
0
Y 0
3 0al
Can
dida
tes –
Ana
lytic
a
wer
e cl
arifi
ed
apte
r 6.
Ple
ase
he c
ount
ry r
epo
perf
ectly
/ ex
celle
n=
not c
onsid
ered
inva
luab
le a
nsw
er
= m
ore
than
7 d
ays
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Georgia
Y Y
Y N
3 4al
Stu
dy o
n Ho
st N
atio
n
/ re
vise
d du
rinno
te t
hat
this
orts
. Th
e nu
mb
t Georgia
Moldova
Y Y
N
Y
4 3
Supp
ort
g th
e ta
ble
berin
g
Ukraine Y Y 4
2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
• Ad
• O
p•
Lo2.
7 Du
ring
pas
• in
t•
co•
co•
th•
th•
th•
th eq•
th re3.
Kn
owle
dg3.
1 Is
you
r org
3.2
Is th
ere
an3.
3
Does
you
r 3.
4 If
you
have
B.
Is
D.
Ha3.
5 If
you
have
pert
aini
ng3.
6 Ha
s you
r cgu
idel
ines
A.
IDdm
inist
rativ
e pe
ratio
nal
ogist
ical
st
ope
ratio
ns (i
.e.
tern
al d
ecisi
on m
oope
ratio
n ac
ross
om
mon
situ
atio
nae
inte
grat
ion
of in
e in
tegr
atio
n of
ine
qual
ity o
f inc
ome
inte
rope
rabi
lity
quip
men
t, la
ngua
ge
prov
ision
of s
uplie
f tea
ms?
e
abou
t the
HN
S ga
niza
tion
fam
ilia
ny o
ther
sect
or in
co
untr
y ha
ve a
he
answ
ered
“YE
S”it
lega
lly b
indi
ng?
ave
you
test
ed it
se
answ
ered
“N
O”
to th
e sa
me
effe
coun
try
signe
d up
/ rec
omm
enda
ti oRL
Gui
delin
es
real
scen
ario
s or
akin
g?
sect
ors?
al
aw
aren
ess?
nt
erna
tiona
l act
ont
erna
tiona
l act
om
ing
assis
tanc
e?y
of in
tern
atio
nal
ges,
etc
.)?
ppor
t (lo
gist
ic, a
d
conc
ept a
nd p
rac
r with
the
HNS
coyo
ur c
ount
ry th
atos
t nat
ion
supp
o”
to th
e qu
estio
n u
? since
its e
stab
lish
to th
e qu
estio
n u
ct, i
.e. H
NS?
to
/ pl
edge
d to
/on
s?
exe
rcise
s) d
id y
o
rs in
the
in-c
ount
rs in
to th
e em
erg
disa
ster
relie
f tea
min
istra
tive,
etc
.)
ctic
es a
lread
y in
pon
cept
in g
ener
al?
t is f
amili
ar w
ith t
rt fr
amew
ork
in p
unde
r poi
nt 3
.3
men
t?
unde
r 3.3
, are
the
/ alig
ned
with
any
Civi
l Pro
tect
ion
Coop
er
u ex
perie
nce
pro
ry c
oord
inat
ion
sten
cy o
pera
tions
?
ams w
ith lo
cal t
ea
) to
inco
min
g in
te
plac
e ? th
e HN
S co
ncep
t?pl
ace?
ere
natio
nal p
rovi
s
of t
he fo
llow
ing
aratio
n fo
r the
Can
dida
te
blem
s rel
ated
to
truc
ture
s?
? ms (
proc
edur
es,
erna
tiona
l disa
ste
? sions
in p
lace
agre
emen
ts /
e Co
untr
ies a
nd P
oten
tia
Armenia
Azerbaijan
4 0
4 0
3 0
N
0N
0
N
0N
0
N
0U
0
N
0
r N
0
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0
P 0
N
0Y
0
Y 0al
Can
dida
tes –
Ana
lytic
a
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Georgia
3 4
3 4
3 4
N
YN
Y
N
YU
Y
U
YU
U
N
Y
N
Y
Y Y
NK
YN
K N
NA
NN
A N
NK
N
U
Nal S
tudy
on
Host
Nat
ion
Georgia
Moldova
4 3
4 4
4 4
Y N
Y
N
Y N
Y
N
Y N
U
N
Y
N
Y N
Y Y
Y N
N
N
N
N
N
N
A N
A N
A N
A Y
N
N
U
Supp
ort
51
Ukraine 4 4 4 N
N
N 0 Y U
N
N Y N
K N
K
NK
NK
NK N
52
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5
B.
UN
C.
EUD.
Ta
E.
Ist
F.
ThG.
N
AH.
An
4.
Requ
est f
o4.
1 Do
you
hav
4.3
Is th
ere
anev
entu
al r
4.6
If th
e au
thin
tern
atio
nop
erat
ions
serv
ices
?4.
8 Do
you
hav
4.10
If
“YES
” to
inte
rnat
ion
4.11
Do
you
hav
4.12
Do
you
hav
mul
tilat
era
5.
Inco
min
g a
5.1
Whi
ch o
f tdi
sast
er re
A.
EUB.
An
N IN
SARA
G Gu
ide
U H
ost N
atio
n Su
pm
pere
Con
vent
iota
nbul
Con
vent
ion
he re
vise
d Ky
oto
CAT
O M
oU o
n vi
tal
ny re
gion
al a
gree
mor
ass
ista
nce
ve a
stan
dard
ized
n es
tabl
ished
coo
req
uest
for i
nter
naho
rity
men
tione
d na
l ass
istan
ce) i
s s i
n yo
ur c
ount
ry,
ve a
ny st
anda
rdiz
o po
int 4
.8, i
s it a
na
l act
ors y
ou a
ddve
bila
tera
l agr
eeve
any
pre
fere
nce
al c
hann
els (
i.e. t
has
sist
ance
th
e fo
llow
ing
inte
elie
f ass
istan
ce to
U
Civ
il Pr
otec
tion
ny o
f the
Par
ticip
aelin
es –
Affe
cted
cpp
ort G
uide
lines
on
n
on te
mpo
rary
ad
Conv
entio
n (2
006
cros
s-bo
rder
tran
men
t cov
erin
g as
p
d ne
eds a
sses
sme
rdin
atio
n m
echa
nat
iona
l ass
istan
ceun
der p
oint
4.5
(ino
t the
sam
e as
t is
ther
e a
coor
din
zed
form
in p
lace
ge
nera
l for
m in
thdr
ess y
our r
eque
sem
ents
in p
lace
ad
e fo
r bila
tera
l ass
hrou
gh re
gion
al /
rnat
iona
l act
ors d
your
cou
ntry
? M
echa
nism
at
ing
Stat
es o
f theco
untr
y re
spon
sib
dmiss
ion
) on
cust
oms p
roc
nspo
rt
pect
s of H
NS
nt m
etho
dolo
gy i
nism
in p
lace
in y
oe
in c
ase
of n
eed?
i.e. t
he o
ne e
ntitl
eth
e on
e re
spon
sibna
tion
mec
hani
sm
for r
eque
stin
g as
he se
nse
that
you
st to
? dd
ress
ing
mut
ual
istan
ce o
r for
any
inte
rnat
iona
l org
do y
ou c
onsid
er e
e EU
Civ
il Pr
otec
ti
Civi
l Pro
tect
ion
Coop
er
bilit
ies
cedu
res
n pl
ace?
ou
r cou
ntry
that
c? ed
to re
ques
t and
ble
for d
irect
ing
thm
in p
lace
bet
wee
sista
nce?
u
use
it fo
r com
mu
disa
ster
relie
f ass
y as
sista
nce
rece
ivga
niza
tions
?)
ligib
le t
o pr
ovid
e
on M
echa
nism
ratio
n fo
r the
Can
dida
te
an le
ad to
an
d ac
cept
he
disa
ster
relie
f en
the
two
unic
atio
n w
ith a
ll
sista
nce?
ve
d th
roug
h
e in
tern
atio
nal
e Co
untr
ies a
nd P
oten
tia
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Y 0
N
0Y
0N
0
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0
NP
0
Y 0
Y 0al
Can
dida
tes –
Ana
lytic
a
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Georgia
U
YU
N
U
NY
YY
NN
Y
U
N
N
NY
Y
NA
Y
N
YN
A 0
Y Y
NK
B
Y Y
Y Yal
Stu
dy o
n Ho
st N
atio
n
Georgia
Moldova
Y N
N
N
N
N
Y
U
N
U
Y Y
N
Y
N
N
NY
N
Y N
Y N
0
NA
Y Y
B N
P N
Y Y
Y Y
Supp
ort
Ukraine
N
N
N
N
N Y N
NK Y N Y Y Y N
P Y Y
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
C.
UN
D.
NA
E.
Ot
F.
ThG.
In
tH.
Fo
I. Pr
5.2
Have
you
ato
pro
vide
5.4
If “Y
ES”
to
the
list w
il5.
6 Do
you
hav
your
cou
nt5.
8 Do
you
wa
entr
y of
pe
5.9
If “N
O”
to
5.10
Do
you
hav
inco
min
g r
5.12
Do
you
rec
pers
onne
l 5.
13
Rega
rdin
g ex
empt
th5.
15
Do y
ou h
avpr
oced
ure
5.17
Do
you
pe
5.19
Co
ncer
nin
have
nat
i oN a
genc
ies
ATO
EAP
C co
untr
ith
er b
ilate
ral p
art
hird
cou
ntrie
s te
rnat
iona
l NGO
sor
eign
nat
iona
l NG
ivat
e co
mpa
nies
al
read
y es
tabl
ishe
e yo
u in
tern
atio
na p
oint
5.2
, is t
his
l be
auto
mat
ical
lyve
any
con
trol
me
try
aive
visa
(ent
ry /
eer
sonn
el o
f app
ropo
int 5
.8, c
an is
sve
law
s or e
stab
lire
lief t
eam
s / a
ppco
gnize
pro
fess
io(e
.g. m
edic
al p
e rre
ques
ted
disa
stem
from
all
cust
ove
est
ablis
hed
for
es o
f inc
omin
g / o
rmit
re-e
xpor
tatio
g an
y as
sista
nce
ion
al la
ws /
pra
cticie
s tn
ers
s GOs
ed a
list
of i
nter
naal
disa
ster
relie
f as
list c
onsid
ered
eli
y de
nied
?
echa
nism
in p
lace
exit)
requ
irem
ents
oved
inte
rnat
iona
ued
tem
pora
ry v
ish
ed p
ract
ices
in
prov
ed in
tern
atio
nna
l qua
lific
atio
ns
rson
nel,
engi
neer
ser
relie
f goo
ds a
nom
s dut
ies,
taxe
s rm
s in
plac
e to
faut
goin
g re
lief t
eaon
of e
quip
men
t nc
ludi
ng in
form
ace
s in
plac
e w
aivi
natio
nal a
ctor
s who
ssist
ance
? im
inat
ory
in th
e s
e to
stop
unw
ante
s or a
pply
sim
plifi
l act
ors?
sa
s be
rene
wed
ipl
ace
rega
rdin
g t
nal a
ctor
s (e.
g. li
a/ l
icen
ces /
cer
tifs,
driv
ing
licen
ces
nd e
quip
men
t of i
or a
ny si
mila
r fe e
cilit
ate
bord
er c
rom
s / c
onsig
nmen
or u
nuse
d go
ods?
tion
and
com
mun
ng re
gula
tory
bar
rCivi
l Pro
tect
ion
Coop
er
o yo
u co
nsid
er a
p
sens
e th
at o
ffers
f
ed in
tern
atio
nal a
ied
visa
pro
cedu
r
n co
untr
y?
the
lega
l sta
tus o
fbi
lity,
ent
erin
g in
ficat
es o
f for
eign
ds,
etc
.)?
ncom
ing
relie
f tea
es?
ossin
g / i
mm
igra
tts
? ? ni
catio
n te
chno
lorie
rs, s
uch
as li
cenra
tion
for t
he C
andi
date
ppro
ved
/ elig
ible
from
thos
e no
t on
ssist
ance
to e
nter
es to
faci
litat
e th
e
f per
sonn
el o
f to
con
trac
t, et
c.)?
disa
ster
relie
f
ams,
do
you
ion
/ cus
tom
s
gy (I
CT),
do y
ou
nsin
g
e Co
untr
ies a
nd P
oten
tia
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0
n N
0
r N
0
e Y
0
NA
0
? Y
0
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0
Y 0al
Can
dida
tes –
Ana
lytic
a
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Georgia
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
NK
Y
NA
Y
NK
Y
Y Y
NA
N0
Y
Y C
Y Y
N
Y
Y Y
NK
Yal S
tudy
on
Host
Nat
ion
Georgia
Moldova
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y N
Y N
A N
Y Y
Y Y
N
A N
A Y
Y N
CP
NK
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
NSupp
ort
53
Ukraine Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N
NA N
NK 0 NK Y Y Y Y NK
54
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
requ
irem
elim
itatio
nspo
sses
s?
5.20
Do
you
hav
dogs
bei
ng5.
22
If “N
O”
to
dogs
bei
n g5.
25
Do y
ou h
ava
requ
este
5.27
If
“NO
” to
as
par
t of t
5.30
Do
you
hav
emer
genc
y5.
32
If “N
O”
to
you
requ
e5.
35
Wou
ld th
eco
untr
y be
stru
ck b
y a
6 O
pera
tion
6.1
Do y
ou h
avin
tegr
ated
6.2
If “Y
ES”
to
6.3
If “N
O”
to
6.4
Has a
ny m
coor
dina
ti6.
6 Th
e sa
fety
6.8
Do y
ou e
xpents
to u
se a
lloca
ts o
n th
e m
ovem
en
ve p
rovi
sions
in p
g pa
rt o
f a re
ques
poin
t 5.2
0, d
o yo
g pa
rt o
f a re
ques
ve p
rovi
sions
in p
ed fo
reig
n di
sast
epo
int 5
.25,
do
yoth
e eq
uipm
ent o
fve
pro
visio
ns in
py
relie
f med
icat
iopo
int 5
.30,
do
yost
ed?
e re
leva
nt p
rovi
sioei
ng a
tran
sit c
oun
a di
sast
er?
ns ve le
gal f
ram
ewo
d w
ith th
e na
tiona
poi
nt 6
.1, i
s it a
gpo
int 6
.1, a
re th
eea
sure
(e.g
. lia
isoon
with
inte
rnat
ioy
and
secu
rity
of t
pect
disa
ster
reliete
d fr
eque
ncie
s, r
nt o
f hum
anita
ria
plac
e re
gard
ing
thte
d fo
reig
n di
sast
ou w
aive
vet
erin
arte
d in
tern
atio
nal
plac
e re
gard
ing
thr r
elie
f tea
m?
ou w
aive
any
impo
f a re
ques
ted
inte
plac
e re
gard
ing
thon
you
requ
este
d?ou
wai
ve a
ny im
po
ons i
n pl
ace
for h
ont
ry fo
r disa
ster
r
rk /
any
proc
edur
al c
oord
inat
ion
str
gene
ral f
ram
ewor
ere
esta
blish
ed fu
on o
ffice
rs, t
echn
ion
al a
ctor
s bei
ng
he in
tern
atio
nal d
ef te
ams t
o be
selre
stric
tions
on
the
an te
ams b
ecau
se
e ex
pedi
tious
ent
ter r
elie
f tea
m?
ry q
uara
ntin
e re
qdi
sast
er re
lief t
e ae
impo
rt o
f med
ic
ort r
estr
ictio
n co
ner
natio
nal d
isast
ee
entr
y of
a re
lief
?
ort r
estr
ictio
n co
n
ost n
atio
n su
ppor
elie
f ite
ms /
team
re in
pla
ce st
ipul
aru
ctur
es?
rk (G
) or d
esig
ned
nctio
ning
pra
ctic
eic
al e
quip
men
t, et
invo
lved
in th
e d
disa
ster
relie
f tea
f-suf
ficie
nt?
Civi
l Pro
tect
ion
Coop
er
e im
port
of I
CT e
q o
f the
ICT
equi
pm
try
of fo
reig
n se
ar
uire
men
ts fo
r sea
am?
catio
n as
par
t of t
ncer
ning
the
impo
r rel
ief t
eam
? f c
onsig
nmen
t con
ncer
ning
the
impo
rt a
lso b
e ap
plic
abm
s sen
t to
assis
t a
ting
how
inte
rnat
d ca
se-b
y-ca
se (C
Ces
tow
ards
this
entc
.) be
en p
ut in
pisa
ster
? m
s is t
he re
spon
sratio
n fo
r the
Can
dida
te
quip
men
t, m
ent t
hey
rch
and
resc
ue
arch
and
resc
ue
the
equi
pmen
t of
ort o
f med
icat
ion
ntai
ning
ort o
f med
icat
ion
ble
in c
ase
of y
our
noth
er c
ount
ry
tiona
l ass
istan
ce i
C)?
nd?
lace
to fa
cilit
ate
ibili
ty o
f…
e Co
untr
ies a
nd P
oten
tia
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Y 0
NA
0
fY
0
NA
0
Y 0
NA
0
r Y
0
s Y
0
CC
0N
A 0
Y
0
H&A
0Y
0al C
andi
date
s – A
naly
tica
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Georgia
N
Y
NC
N
Y Y
NA
Y
Y Y
NA
Y
Y Y
NK
Y
NA
GN
A N
0 Y
HN
HN
Yal
Stu
dy o
n Ho
st N
atio
n
Georgia
Moldova
Y Y
N
N
NA
Y Y
N
Y N
A
Y Y
N
Y N
A
Y Y
Y N
N
G N
A N
A Y
NY
Y
N
H&A
H&Y
Y
Supp
ort
Ukraine
NK N
NK 0 NK 0 0 NK
NK
NK Y &A Y
6 6 6
6.9
If “Y
ES”
to
6.10
W
ould
you
• Lo
• W
• Fo
• Fu
• Te
• Ad
• In
t•
He•
In/
• El
e•
Ot
6.14
Th
e pr
ofes
requ
este
d ac
coun
tab
poi
nt 6
.8, f
or h
owur
cou
ntry
be
able
odgi
ng
ater
oo
d ue
l ec
hnic
al /
ICT
supp
dmin
istra
tive
/ off
terp
reta
tion
ealth
care
/c
ount
ry tr
ansp
orec
tric
ity (e
.g. p
owth
er n
on-fo
od it
emss
iona
l misc
ondu
c h
as a
llege
dly
cau
ble?
w lo
ng?
e to
pro
vide
logi
st
port
fic
e su
ppor
t
rtat
ion
wer
gen
erat
ors)
m
s ct
of a
doc
tor b
ein
used
per
man
ent i
ntical
supp
ort t
o in
ng p
art o
f a fo
reig
nval
idity
of a
disa
Civi
l Pro
tect
ion
Coop
er
nter
natio
nal d
isast
gn d
isast
er re
lief t
aste
r vic
tim. W
ill hra
tion
for t
he C
andi
date
ter r
elie
f tea
ms?
team
you
he
be
held
e Co
untr
ies a
nd P
oten
tia
Armenia
Azerbaijan
>7
0
Y
0€
0€
0€
0Y*
0
Y 0
Y 0
Y*
0Y*
0
€0
Y*
0N
C 0
al C
andi
date
s – A
naly
tica
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Georgia
NA
3
Y
YY
YY
0Y
YN
K 0
NC
YY
YY
0Y
YY
0N
K 0
NK
N
al S
tudy
on
Host
Nat
ion
Georgia
Moldova
3 3/
7 3
Y Y
Y Y
0 €
Y €
0 N
Y
Y Y
Y 0
€ Y
Y 0
Y/€
0 0
N
NK
N
Supp
ort
55
Ukraine
3/7 Y Y € € Y Y Y € Y Y 0 NK
YR
56
9 AN
This tabclarificattogether Legend for
Y = yes, suppoR = reportedly
EMERGE
Legal fram
InstitutiomanagemassistancRisk asse
Standardsituation
EMERGE
Accurate
Use of ex
Coordinainternati
LOGISTIC
Waive vis
Waive cuequipmeInspectioreduced Barriers tare reducBarriers tmedical eReduce bdogs Re-exporunused g
Civil Pr
NNEX II – H
ble summaions and e
r with Chapt
r the below su
orted also by ly yes, no infor
NCY PLANNI
mework app
onal, decisionment structuce essment and
dized Needs a and needs o
NCY MANAG
e and timely s
xisting templ
ation structuonal assistan
CS AND TRAN
sa requireme
ustoms dutieent (incl. vehion and admin/ waived to the imporced to the imporequipment abarriers to th
rtation of eqgoods, even i
rotection Cooper
HNS GUID
rizes the fexplanationster 6.
ummary table
legislation / strmation on co
ING
plicable for in
n making, adures in relatio
gap analysis
assessment of the popula
GEMENT
situation and
late to reque
re in place tonce
NSPORT
ents or grant
es, taxes, tariicles) of inconistrative / d
rt / export, tr
rt / export, trare reduced he import / e
uipment (incif donated is
ration for the Can
DELINES PE
findings prs are prese
:
trategic documorresponding l
ncoming inte
dministrativeon to incomi
s (risks v. ava
methodologation
d needs asse
est internatio
o deal with i
t visas for en
ffs for donatoming teamsdocumentatio
ransit and us
ransit and us
export, transi
cl. search do permitted
ndidate Countries
ER PARTN
resented inented ther
mentslegislation
ernational as
e and informang internatio
ailable resou
gy to assess t
essment
onal assistan
ncoming
ntry, exit and
ted goods an
on requirem
se of ICT equ
se of medica
it and use of
gs, vehicles)
s and Potential C
NER COUN
n detail ureby, this t
N = not considP = partially
ssistance
ation onal
rces)
he
nce
d transit
nd
ments are
uipment
tion and
f search
and
andidates – Analy
NTRY
nder the able shall
dered EPN
Arm
enia
Azer
baija
n
Y NI
Y NI
NI NI
Y NI
Y NI
Y NI
Y NI
Y NI
Y NI
Y NI
Y NI
P NI
Y NI
Y NI
ytical Study on H
country realways be
P = establisheNI = no inform
Bela
rus
Geor
gia
P Y
P Y
NI NI
N N
NI NI
N Y
NI Y
Y Y
Y Y
NI Y
NI R
P R
N P
Y Y
ost Nation Suppo
eports. As reviewed
ed practiceation
Mol
dova
Ukr
aine
Y P
Y Y
NI NI
Y NI
Y NI
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y R
Y Y
Y Y
P NI
Y Y
Y Y
ort
Ensuring personneProvisionpersonneProvisionelectricitProvision
LEGAL AN
RecognizinternatiRecognizactors Consider
Civil Pr
appropriateel, their equin of administel, translation of subsisteny, etc.)
n of medical
ND FINANCIA
ze professiononal relief pe
ze the legal s
r issues of lia
rotection Cooper
e security andipment and trative and lon, equipmennce commod
support
AL ISSUES
nal qualificatersonnel tatus of pers
bility for dam
ration for the Can
d safety of inrelief consig
ogistic suppont, transport,dities (food, w
ions and cer
sonnel of ass
mage caused
ndidate Countries
nternational gnments ort (office, ad, etc.) water, lodgi
rtificates of
sisting intern
d by relief pe
s and Potential C
relief
dmin.
ng,
national
ersonnel
andidates – Analy
Arm
enia
Azer
baija
n
Y NI
Y NI
P Ni
Y NI
Y NI
P NI
N NI
ytical Study on H
Bela
rus
Geor
gia
Y Y
P P
Y P
Y NI
Y P
N R
N R
ost Nation Suppo
5
Mol
dova
Ukr
aine
Y Y
P Y
P Y
Y Y
NI R
Y N
NI P
ort
57
58
10 AN
The compeople. Wand expeus. Special th Armenia
Azerbaija
Belarus
Georgia
Moldova
Ukraine
Civil Protec
NNEX III –
pletion of tWe would lerts who m
hanks to the
an
a
ction Cooperation
ACKNOW
this Study wlike to acknade themse
e experts of
HTMDDJeDADGDMSePInSeD
n for the Candida
WLEDGEME
would not hnowledge anelves availa
f the Partne
ovhannes igran Gidac
Mkrtich UlikDepartment,Department;eyhun Isga
Department,Anna UssDepartment,Georgi CharDepartment Ministry of In
ergiu Gradirotection a
nternal Affaergiy Kravch
Department,
te Countries and
ENTS
have been pnd express
able and sha
er Countries
Yemishyanchyan - Depkyan - Dep, Karen Ba; andarli -, Ministry o
- Deputy, Ministry orkviani - Se
of Emergenternal Affanaru - Spec
and Emergeairs; henko, Seni, State Eme
Potential Candid
possible withereby our
ared their k
s; namely:
- Head ofputy Head oputy Head abasyan -
Senior Adof Emergency Head oof Emergencenior speciaency and Spairs; cialist, Operency Situati
ior Expert oergency Serv
dates – Analytical
thout the cr gratitude knowledge a
f Civil Protof Civil Prot
of OperatInstructor
dvisor Intecy Situationof Internatcy Situationalist, Emerpecial Mea
rational Divion Services
of the Internvice of Ukra
l Study on Host N
contributionto all the cand experie
tection Deptection Deptional Manof Civil P
ernational s; tional Coos;
rgency Manasures Cent
vision, Specs of the M
national Cooaine
Nation Support
n of many olleagues ence with
partment, partment, nagement Protection
Relations
operation
nagement ter of the
ialist Civil Ministry of
operation
Civil Protection and Disaster Management
www.euroeastcp.eu