STUDY OF FACTORS IN WORK-LIFE BALANCE AMONG...
Transcript of STUDY OF FACTORS IN WORK-LIFE BALANCE AMONG...
Volume 4, Number 2, April – June‟ 2015
ISSN (Print):2279-0950, (Online):2279-0969
PEZZOTTAITE JOURNALS SJIF (2012): 2.9, SJIF (2013): 5.071, SJIF (2014): 5.97
International Journal of Organizational Behaviour & Management Perspectives © Pezzottaite Journals. 1761 |P a g e
STUDY OF FACTORS IN WORK-LIFE BALANCE AMONG WOMEN EMPLOYEES
IN IT SECTOR WITH RESPECT TO AGE, MARITAL STATUS AND FAMILY STRUCTURE
Sadhvi28
ABSTRACT
In the fast changing socio-cultural environment, lot of emphasis is given to women education. As a result, more and more
number of women is now working. Gone are the days when men folk were the bread earners for the family. Now women also
share equal responsibility with men. Thanks to the information technology, which has given a broad platform by providing lot
of job opportunities? Work-life balance, therefore has become a challenge now a days for all corporate and it is being
discussed everywhere as a major issue. Work-life balance actually is all about having balanced time for work and personal
life. It includes proper prioritizing and balancing of work and lifestyle. Where work-life balance can lead to a healthy synergy
within the employee, the work-life imbalance can lead to conflicts, job dissatisfaction, health problems, low productivity etc.
WLB, therefore, has become a challenge for working professionals. Though everybody is affected by it in some or the other
way, surveys have indicated that the majority of women population have either turndown or do not pursue jobs because of the
fear that job may disturb their personal lives. Since women are to take care of their family and do most of the household work,
balancing the professional life and personal life simultaneously becomes a challenge. They start feeling that they are not able
to justice with both of their roles.
Purpose: The present study attempts to identify the factors that may lead to work-life imbalance especially in women in IT
Sector. The study attempts to find out the problems faced by working women in IT Sector. This paper will also study whether
age factor, marital status and family structure affects work-life balance. It strives to study the degree to which certain factors
affect work-life balance.
Methods: This research is carried out in IT sector in Delhi and NCR by collecting primary data through structured
questionnaire irrespective of their cadre and age group from the sample of 100 female employees. The analysis is done by
statistical tools like Factor analysis, ANOVA, t-test etc., using SPSS.
Result: Result shows that age and marital status affects the work-life balance in working women. Certain factors like
Company police, Flexibility, company facilitation etc., also are the factors affecting Work-life balance.
Implications: Through this study, we would work out the possible solution to the work-life related problems. The study
would help the IT and other Industries to formulate the policies and flexible work environment to improve women
employment in the industry and women are encouraged to take up jobs. Results may encourage companies to bring work- life
balance among working women by formulating company policies, which are supportive enough to retain women employees.
A better male-female ratio can be achieved if some flexibility in terms of job is provided.
KEYWORDS
Work-Life Balance, Working Women, Factors in WLB, IT Industry, Age, Marital Status, Family Structure etc.
INTRODUCTION
The contribution of the Indian IT industry to the Indian economy over the years has increased tremendously as per the study of
NASSCOM. The contribution is immense with respect to service sector in India. However, the industry is fast paced which is also
suffering from high attrition rate, poor commitment of employees and is depicted with high stress in the job.
The term Work Life balance has been receiving heightened attention and importance since two decades (De Bruin & Dupuis,
2004). Though everybody is affected by it in some or the other way, surveys have indicated that the majority of women population
(72%) have either turndown or do not pursue jobs because of the fear that job may disturb their personal lives. This is evident
from the fact that only 9% of IT professionals in the total labor force are women.
From past two decades, the term Work-life balance (WLB) has been an area of interest and research and is been defined in many
different ways. Work-life balance is balancing the work-family with low conflict. (Limoges, 2003). It is how much the person is
able to utilize or distribute his/her energy, effort between work and family (Parasuraman and Greenhaus 2002).
Handling Work-life balance has become critical as well as it is challenging. In the past decade, globally the number of women
workforce has increased with added responsibilities of home especially raising their children (Brown, 2004; Duxbury & Higgins,
28Assistant Professor, Bhavan‘s Usha & Lakshmi Mittal Institute of Management, New Delhi, India, [email protected]
Volume 4, Number 2, April – June‟ 2015
ISSN (Print):2279-0950, (Online):2279-0969
PEZZOTTAITE JOURNALS SJIF (2012): 2.9, SJIF (2013): 5.071, SJIF (2014): 5.97
International Journal of Organizational Behaviour & Management Perspectives © Pezzottaite Journals. 1762 |P a g e
2001, 2003; Parker & Arthur, 2004). Especially in India with change in socio-demographic factors in terms of nuclear families,
dual-career and single parent families, the concept of work-life balance for women is particularly very important. The companies
are facing the challenge of talent retention in this era of global development economy. There is a need to address the issue of work
life balance in order to win the talent war. To retain the best talent and prevent the burning of the talent because of stressful life, it
becomes a critical issue for the companies to device such policies, practices, programs and interventions to bring harmony and
synergy between work and life of their employees.
Work-Life Imbalance can become a critical disease unless it is handled with care. The recent study is an attempt to understand
WLB and would help IT industry understand the problems of women workers. It will help IT sector to formulate the healthy
policies and work environment to ensure WLB for working women so that large and large number of women are encouraged to
work with IT Companies and the ratio of female employees also increases.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Lot of research has been taken place in terms of work-life balance. Time to time some factors are been unveiled that are some or
the other way responsible for creating disturbance in work and life. From some researches, we understand that there are four
general policy areas that that may be considered very important for discussion in this domain (Brough et al. 2008; Baird 2011;
Hegewisch and Gornick 2011). The first primarily talks about employee-centered flexibility, like, changing the location or
scheduling of work to make working more convenient. Its positive impact can also be seen on health and wellbeing and job
outcomes (Nijp 2012). However, there are varieties of mixed evidence pertaining to the degree to which flexible work practices in
a different way put impact on work-life outcomes (Allen 2013).
The second area is the concept of leaves in terms of paid and unpaid leave. It means how much the employees can avail leaves for
their family reasons like maternity leaves, paternity leaves so that they can address their family responsibilities (Baird and
Whitehouse 2012, King 2012). There are empirical researches which points at the fact that maternity leaves is highly beneficial in
terms of good health for mother as well as care for the child (Productivity Commission 2009). However, there is research which
has come out with observation that fathers are unable to utilize their paternity leave (Smith and Williams 2007; Haas and
Rostgaard 2011; Hegewisch and Gornick 2011).
The third policy in studying work-life balance is the working hours. Majority of research from Australia and overseas suggests
that there is direct impact on work related stress leading to conflict because of long working hours (Holden 2010). This actually
gives rise to the fourth area, which strives on childcare and the impact of this on the employees. Just as paid parental leave, access
to high quality childcare is also considered a very essential support in terms of parents‘ participation in paid work. It is a critical
and delicate issue pertaining to the care of the children especially when parents are working. The slight imbalance causes conflict
and leads to immense pressure on the parents leading to work life imbalance (Bianchi and Milkie 2010).
Women‘s employment participation (Breunig et al. 2011) is also an important factor to be taken care and it was agreed that these
are the factors that influence parents‘ decisions to go for a certain type of childcare provision (e.g., family-provided or formal
services); or issues related to children‘s health (Bohanna et al. 2012). By reviewing another ten different studies from New
Zealand and Australia regarding working hours, it was concluded that working hours has a direct impact on work life balance.
(Gray et al. 2004; Alexander and Baxter 2005; Brough et al. 2005; Hosking and Western 2008; Macky and Boxall 2008; Skinner
and Pocock 2008; Losoncz and Bortolotto 2009; Peetz et al. 2011; Skinner and Pocock 2011a; Brown 2012).
METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH
Objectives of Study
To find out the problems faced by working women in IT Sector with respect to WLB.
To identify the factors that lead to imbalance in WLB.
To find out whether age, marital status and family structure affects WLB
To find out whether different age group affects WLB
Research Design: This study is an exploratory and descriptive research where we study and explore various factors that may lead
to imbalance in Work-Life Balance among women in IT Industry.
Data Collection: Primary data was directly collected through structured questionnaire for WLB.
Method and Tools Used: A structured questionnaire was used to measure WLB. The population included female IT professionals
from Delhi and NCR. 150 questionnaires were distributed in total but the actual response rate was 100. Therefore, a population of
100 could be sampled. Data from the questionnaires was coded and analysed. Mean, Standard deviation, Cronbach's Alpha, and
Pearson correlation were used as statistical tools to assess the reliability and correlations or relationship between WLB, Age,
gender and marital status. SPSS was used to generate the results.
Volume 4, Number 2, April – June‟ 2015
ISSN (Print):2279-0950, (Online):2279-0969
PEZZOTTAITE JOURNALS SJIF (2012): 2.9, SJIF (2013): 5.071, SJIF (2014): 5.97
International Journal of Organizational Behaviour & Management Perspectives © Pezzottaite Journals. 1763 |P a g e
Work-Life Balance was measured using a questionnaire containing structured questions. All items were rated on five point scale.
―The weight attached to the scales were 1=strongly disagree; 2=disagree; 3=undecided; 4=agree; 5=strongly agree‖. Seven
factors, namely, Company Policy, Attitude, Health Facilities, Telephone Facility, Company Facilitation, Flexibility, Study leave
were studied to arrive at the results.
―Cronbach's Alpha‖ was used to test the reliability of data. ―Cronbach's Alpha‖ was found to be 0.80 which is more than the
standard value (0.70). Using Pearson correlation through SPSS we correlated the measures.
KMO test was performed to check the validity of sample. (The standard value should be .5) Since KMO value is more than .5,
therefore the sample is adequate to represent the population.
Table-1: KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. .541
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 1.173E3
D.f. 171
Sig. .000
Sources: Authors Compilation
Table-2
Sources: Authors Compilation
Volume 4, Number 2, April – June‟ 2015
ISSN (Print):2279-0950, (Online):2279-0969
PEZZOTTAITE JOURNALS SJIF (2012): 2.9, SJIF (2013): 5.071, SJIF (2014): 5.97
International Journal of Organizational Behaviour & Management Perspectives © Pezzottaite Journals. 1764 |P a g e
Table-3
Sources: Authors Compilation
From the set of 19 components in the questionnaire, 7 factors could be generated. The total variance explained is as under:
Factor 1 is named as Company Policy and it consists of five components namely Telecommuting, Holidays, Cultural
leaves, Pooling of leaves, Paid Maternity. It has created a difference of variation of 13.580 on WLB
Factor 2 is named as Attitude of people (at home and office) and it consists of four components namely Spouse Support,
Family‘s attitude, Superior‘s attitude, Colleagues attitude. It has created a difference of variation of 13.580 on WLB
Factor 3 is named Health factor as and it consists of two components namely Health Programs and Exercise. It has
created a difference of variation of 12.926 on WLB
Factor 4 is named as Telephone facility and is an independent factor in itself. It has created a difference of variation of
10.503 on WLB
Factor 5 is named as Company Facilitation and it consists of three components namely Parenting, Relocation, and
Career Rooms. It has created a difference of variation of 10.193 on WLB
Factor 6 is named as Flexibility and Transportation and it consists of two components namely Flexibility and
Transportation. It has created a difference of variation of 7.591 on WLB
Factor 7 is named as Study Leaves and is an independent factor in itself. It has created a difference of variation of 7.381
on WLB
Hypothesis
The following hypotheses were generated:
Hypothesis Statement 1: WLB is significantly affected by Family Structure.
Hypothesis Statement 2: WLB is significantly affected by Age Factor.
Hypothesis Statement 3: WLB is significantly affected by Marital Status.
Hypothesis Statement 4: WLB varies in different Age Groups.
FINDINGS AND RESULTS
Hypothesis Statement 1: WLB is significantly affected by Family Structure.
Null Hypothesis: Family Structure does not affect the WLB.
Alternate Hypothesis: Family Structure affects the WLB.
Volume 4, Number 2, April – June‟ 2015
ISSN (Print):2279-0950, (Online):2279-0969
PEZZOTTAITE JOURNALS SJIF (2012): 2.9, SJIF (2013): 5.071, SJIF (2014): 5.97
International Journal of Organizational Behaviour & Management Perspectives © Pezzottaite Journals. 1765 |P a g e
Table-4: One-Way Anova for Family Structure and WLB
Sources: Authors Compilation
The significance of Family Structure on WLB was studied by using Anova. Results presented in Table 4 indicate that Family
Structure does not significantly affect work-life balance. Since p value (0.123) is more than α (.05), it implies that Family
Structure does not affect WLB. We therefore accept Ho as the hypothesis is non-significant.
Hypothesis Statement 2: WLB is significantly affected by Age Groups
Null Hypothesis: Age Factor does not affect the WLB.
Alternate Hypothesis: Age Factor affects the WLB.
Table-5: One-Way Anova for Age Groups and WLB
ANOVA
WLBA
Sum of Squares d.f. Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 1.528 2 .764 12.320 .000
Within Groups 5.953 96 .062
Total 7.480 98
Sources: Authors Compilation
The significance of Age Groups on WLB was studied by using One-way Anova. Results presented in Table 5 indicate that Age
Groups significantly affect work-life balance. Since p value (0.000) is less than α (.05), it implies that Age Groups affect WLB.
We therefore reject H0 as the hypothesis is significant.
Hypothesis Statement 3: WLB is significantly affected by Marital Status.
Null Hypothesis: Marital Status does not affect the WLB.
Alternate Hypothesis: Marital Status affects the WLB.
Table-6: One-Way Anova for Marital Status and WLB
ANOVA
WLBA
Sum of Squares d.f. Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups .692 1 .692 9.852 .002
Within Groups 6.882 98 .070
Total 7.574 99
Sources: Authors Compilation
The significance of Marital Status on WLB was studied by using One-way Anova. Results presented in Table 6 indicate that
Marital Status significantly affect work-life balance. Since p value (0.002) is less than α (.05), it implies that Marital Status affect
WLB. We therefore reject H0 as the hypothesis is significant.
Hypothesis Statement 4: WLB varies in different Age Groups.
Null Hypothesis: WLB does not vary in different Age Groups
Alternate Hypothesis: WLB significantly varies in different Age Groups
We have divided the age factor in three groups. Age group 1 includes female employees who are less than 30. Age group 2
includes female employees who fall in the age group of (31-40). Age group 3 constitutes of female employees more than 40.
Volume 4, Number 2, April – June‟ 2015
ISSN (Print):2279-0950, (Online):2279-0969
PEZZOTTAITE JOURNALS SJIF (2012): 2.9, SJIF (2013): 5.071, SJIF (2014): 5.97
International Journal of Organizational Behaviour & Management Perspectives © Pezzottaite Journals. 1766 |P a g e
Table-7: Independent Sample t-test for Age Group 1 & 2
Sources: Authors Compilation
To check the variation of age group 1 (less than 30) and age group 2 (31-40) independent t-test was performed. The result from
Levene‘s Test indicates that there is no significant variation between age group 1 and 2 as p value (0.585) is more than α (0.05).
Therefore, we are considering significant value of Equal Variance Assumed. From t-test of Equality of Means, the p value (0.0) is
less than α, therefore we reject H0. It means that WLB varies between Age Group 1 & 2.
Table-8: Independent Sample t-test for Age Group 1 & 3
Sources: Authors Compilation
To check the variation of age group 1 (less than 30) and age group 3 (above 40) independent t-test was performed. The result from
Levene‘s Test indicates that there is no significant variation between age group 1 and 3 as p value (0.263) is more than α (0.05).
Therefore, we are considering significant value of Equal Variance Assumed. From t-test of Equality of Means, the p value (0.0) is
less than α, therefore we reject H0. It means that WLB varies between Age Group 1 & 3.
Table-9: Independent Sample t-test for Age Group 2 & 3
Sources: Authors Compilation
To check the variation of age group 2 (31-40) and group 3 (above 40) independent t-test was performed. The result from Levene‘s
Test indicates that there is no significant variation between age group 2 and 3 as p value (0.321) is more than α (0.05). Therefore,
we are considering significant value of Equal Variance Assumed. From t-test of Equality of Means, the p value (0.407) is more
than α, therefore we accept H0. It means that WLB does not vary between Age Group 2 & 3. Therefore, WLB varies in the age
group of 1 & 3 and also age group 1 &2. However, WLB does not vary in the age group of 2& 3.
CONCLUSION
From the study, we have concluded that Age Groups and Marital Status significantly affect work-life balance whereas Family
structure has not much to do with work-life balance. Where all female employees seek family support, the family structure does
not significantly affect work-life balance. It was also found that Work-life balance among working women also varies with Age.
Apart from these factors the other factors which came into highlight is Company Policy consisting of five components namely
Telecommuting, Holidays, Cultural leaves, Pooling of leaves, and Paid Maternity. Another important factor which was deduced
from the study was Attitude of people (at home and office) and includes Spouse Support, Family‘s attitude, Superior‘s attitude,
Equal variances
assumed 0.301 0.585 -3.776 89 0
Equal variances not
assumed -3.36 24.737 0.003
WLBA
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Equal variances assumed
1.272 0.263 -3.865 78 0
Equal variances not
assumed -4.336 9.201 0.002
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
WLBA
Equal variances assumed
1.026 0.321 -0.844 25 0.407
Equal variances not
assumed -0.97 18.54 0.344
Sig. (2-
tailed)
WLBA
F Sig. t df
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
Volume 4, Number 2, April – June‟ 2015
ISSN (Print):2279-0950, (Online):2279-0969
PEZZOTTAITE JOURNALS SJIF (2012): 2.9, SJIF (2013): 5.071, SJIF (2014): 5.97
International Journal of Organizational Behaviour & Management Perspectives © Pezzottaite Journals. 1767 |P a g e
and Colleagues attitude without which it is difficult for a women to continue their work. Health factor cannot be neglected as
Health Programs and Exercises are very much required and company facilitation like Parenting, Relocation, and Career Rooms
are very much in demand by female employees. Another factor like work flexibility and Transportation which allow working
women to continue with their jobs without much problem and the concept of study leaves are also considered by women
workforce as vital requirement, so that they can pursue their higher studies. In order to really manage and retain the women talent
pool it is therefore pertinent for organizations to addresses these factors while designing their policies. The organizations must
understand the needs of women employees and frame the policies incorporating the above factors such as flexibility,
transportation, career rooms, study leaves, paid maternity leaves etc. Since women are more sensitive towards the environment
specially attitude of colleagues and boss at office and spouse at home, it is therefore required for the organizations to provide a
healthy work environment so that women employees can also give their contribution towards national development and balance
male-female employment ratio.
REFERENCES
1. Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work–family conflict and flexible work
arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345–376.
2. Breunig, R, Weiss, A, Yamauchi, C, Gong, X & Mercante, J 2011. Child care availability, quality and affordability: Are
local problems related to labour supply? Economic Record, 87(276), 109–124.
3. Brown, P. (2004). Promoting work/life balance in a „hurry culture‟: Issues and challenges, pp. 3-18. Issue 2 of
Griffith University professorial lecture series, Griffith University.
4. Bohanna, I., Davis, E., Corr, L., Priest, N., & Tan, H. (2012). Family day care in Australia: A systematic review of
research (1996–2010). Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(4), 138–146.
5. Brough, P., Holt, J., Bauld, R., Biggs, A., & Ryan, C. (2008). The ability of work—life balance policies to influence key
social / organizational issues. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 46(3), 261–274.
6. Baird, M. (2011). The state, work and family in Australia. The International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 22(18), 3742–3754.
7. Baird, M., & Whitehouse, G. (2012). Paid Parental Leave: First Birthday Policy Review. Australian Bulletin of
Labour, 38(3), 184–198.
8. Bianchi, S. M., & Milkie, M. A. (2010). Work and family research in the first decade of the 21st century. Journal of
Marriage and Family, 72(3), 705–725.
9. Brough, P., O'Driscoll, M. P., & Kalliath, T. J. (2005). The ability of ‗family friendly‘ organizational resources to
predict work–family conflict, job, and family satisfaction. Stress and Health, 21(4), 223–234.
10. De Bruin, A., & Dupuis, A. (2004, February). Work-life balance? Insight from non-standard work. New Zealand
Journal of Employment Relations, 29(1), 21-37.
11. Gray, M., Qu, L., Stanton, D., & Weston, R. (2004). Long work hours and the wellbeing of fathers and their families.
Australian Journal of Labour Economics, 7(2), 255–273.
12. Greenhaus, Jeffrey H., Collins, Karen M., & Shaw, Jason D. (2002). The relation between work–family balance and
quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 510–531.
13. Hegewisch, A., & Gornick, J. C. (2011). The impact of work-family policies on women's employment: a review of
research from OECD countries, Community. Work and Family, 14(2), 119–138.
14. Haas, L., & Rostgaard, T. (2011). Fathers‘ rights to paid parental leave in the Nordic countries: Consequences for the
gendered division of leave, Community. Work and Family, 14(2), 177–195.
15. Holden, L, Scuffham, P., Hilton, M., Vecchio, N., & Whiteford, H. (2010). Work performance decrements are
associated with Australian working conditions. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 52(3), 281–
290.
16. Hosking, A., & Western, M. (2008). The effects of non-standard employment on work—family conflict. Journal of
Sociology, 44(1), 5–27.
Volume 4, Number 2, April – June‟ 2015
ISSN (Print):2279-0950, (Online):2279-0969
PEZZOTTAITE JOURNALS SJIF (2012): 2.9, SJIF (2013): 5.071, SJIF (2014): 5.97
International Journal of Organizational Behaviour & Management Perspectives © Pezzottaite Journals. 1768 |P a g e
17. King, R., Karuntzos, G., Casper, L., Moen, P., Davis, K., Berkman, L., Durham, M., & Kossek, E. (2012). Work–family
balance issues and work–leave policies. In Gatchel, R. J. and Schultz, I. Z. (eds.), Handbook of Occupational Health
and Wellness. Springer US.
18. Limoges, J. (2003, November). Food for Thought, a Balanced Work Life: A Matter of Maintenance, pp. 3. Canadian
Career Development Foundation.
19. Losoncz, Soncz I, & Bortolotto, N. (2009). Work-life balance: The experiences of Australian working mothers. Journal
of Family Studies, 15(2), 15(2), 122–138.
20. Macky, K., & Boxall, P. (2008). High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee wellbeing: A
study of New Zealand worker experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 46(1), 38–55.
21. Morris, M. L., & Madsen, S. R. (2007). Advancing work-life Integration in individuals, organizations and communities.
Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9, 439-439.
22. Morrissey, T. W., & Warner, M. E. (2011). An exploratory study of the impacts of an employer-supported childcare
program. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(3), 344–354.
23. Nijp, H. H. M., Beckers, D. G. J. P., Geurts, SaEP, Tucker, P. P., & Kompier, MaJP. (2012). Systematic review on the
association between employee work time control and work-non-work balance, health and well-being, and job-related
outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 38(4), 299-313.
24. Parasuraman, S., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2002). Toward reducing some critical gaps in work-family research. Human
Resource Management Review, 12, 299-312.
25. Peetz, D., Muurlink, O., Townsend, K., Allan, C., & Fox, A. (2011). Quality and quantity in work-home conflict: The
nature and direction of effects of work on employees' personal relationships and partners. Australian Bulletin of
Labour, 37(2), 138-163.
26. Parker, P., & Arthur, M. (2004). Giving voice to the dual-career couple. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling,
32(1), 3-23.
27. Pocock, B, Skinner, N & Williams, P 2012. Time Bomb. Work rest and play in Australia today, New South Publishing,
Sydney.
28. Renda, J., Baxter, J., & Alexander, M. (2009). Exploring the work-family policies mothers say would help after the birth
of a child. Australian Journal of Labour Economics, 12(1), 65–87.
29. Skinner, N., & Pocock, B. (2008). Work-life conflict: Is work time or work overload more important? Asia Pacific
Journal of Human Resources, 46(3), 303–315.
30. Smith, A. J., & Williams, D. R. (2007). Father-friendly legislation and paternal time across Western Europe. Journal of
Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 9(2), 175–192.
31. Skinner, N., & Pocock, B. (2011a). Flexibility and work-life interference in Australia. Journal of Industrial Relations,
53(1), 65–82.
32. Retrieved from http://www.referencerepository.com/homes/journalarticles/page:9/jrnl:Asia Pacific Journal of Human
R...
33. Retrieved from http://www.biomedsearch.com/article/Factors-affecting-employee-use-work/163393856.html
34. Retrieved from https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa18759
35. Retrieved from
http://www.referencerepository.com/homes/journalarticles/page:9/jrnl:Asia%20Pacific%20Journal%20of%2...
*****