Student Quiz Report - Mr. Tyler's Lessons · 2016-11-29 · Austria-Hungary and Serbia’s...

11/28/2016

World History Warm Up (11-28-2016) - World ... Total Questions: 50Most Correct Answers: #1 Least Correct Answers: #15

1. World War I destroyed a large amount of European farm land.

22/38 A True

2/38 B False

2. What were the main reasons for the first World War?

7/38 A Murder of German President in Berlin

11/38 B Murder of Austria's heir in Sarajevo

3/38 C Territorial rivalry

5/38 D The revolution of Russia with Lenin

3. Which of the following was not a cause of World War I?

8/38 A Nationalism

5/38 B Balkan War

10/38 C Hundred Years War

5/38 D Franco-Prussian War

4. Which countries were not in the Triple Entene in 1914? Select all that apply.

14/38 A USA

10/38 B Russia

17/38 C Italy

15/38 D Belgium

5. All of these were major battles of WWI except....

5/38 A Battle of the Somme

6/38 B Battle of the Marne

7/38 C Battle of Antietam

10/38 D Battle of Gallipoli

6. In which year did the Battle of Verdun start?

6/38 A 1914

3/38 B 1915

12/38 C 1916

4/38 D 1917

of 29

7. In which years did the Attrition War take place?

3/38 A Between 1914 - 1917

6/38 B Between 1915 - 1917

13/38 C Between 1914 - 1918

7/38 D Between 1915 - 1918

8. Which country made the first declaration of war?

1/38 A Serbia

11/38 B Austria-Hungary

0/38 C Italy

16/38 D Germany

9. Which German attack provoked Britain to go to war?

11/38 A The attack on France

2/38 B The attack on Luxembourg

10/38 C The attack on Belgium

3/38 D The attack on Russia

10. Which country joined the war on the side of the Allied Powers in 1917?

8/38 A Romania

4/38 B Serbia

4/38 C Greece

12/38 D USA

11. World War One is also known as......

7/38 A The War of Verdun

2/38 B The Kaiser's War

2/38 C The Joffre's War

15/38 D The War to End all Wars

12. Which of the following military technologies were developed during World WarI? Select all the apply.

4/38 A Napalm

13/38 B Gas Mask

4/38 C Ironclad Ships

15/38 D Tanks

13. What was the area in between trenches called during World War I?

of 29

17/38 A No Man's Land

1/38 B No Tolerance Land

5/38 C The Dead Zone

3/38 D The Great Soldier Zone

14. Who won the first World War ?

13/38 A Allies in 1918

3/38 B Central Powers in 1917

7/38 C Allies in 1917

4/38 D Central Powers and a Neutral Power in 1918

15. _____ is the propaganda technique suggesting you should do what everyoneelse is doing.

7/38 A Overgeneralization

4/38 B Bandwagon

8/38 C Symbolism

7/38 D Identifying a Cause with a person or nobel idea

16. The _____ was a World War I agency created by President Wilson to oversee theproduction and distribution of good's manufactured by the war industries.

13/38 A National War Labor Board

7/38 B War Industries Board

6/38 C National Distribution Board

1/38 D Wartime Information Board

17. _____ are payments for damages and expenses brought on by war.

4/38 A Tolls

5/38 B Remittances

8/38 C Reparations

10/38 D Propositions

18. The _____ required men between the ages of 21 and 30 to register to be draftedinto the armed forces.

6/38 A Patriot Act

7/38 B Citizenship Act

2/38 C Sedition Act

12/38 D Selective Service Act

19. Soon after the war started, both sides dug-in and this resulted in the use of_____ for the rest of the war in France.

of 29

5/38 A Depression

3/38 B Cleats

3/38 C Rations

15/38 D Trench Warfare

20. Which of the following countries belonged to the Triple Entente in 1914? Selectall that apply.

22/38 A France

7/38 B Italy

13/38 C Britain

11/38 D Russia

21. Which term below was used by the press by late 1914 to describe the war onthe western front had become a _____, a situation in which neither side can win aclear victory.

1/38 A Tie

9/38 B Draw

12/38 C Stalemate

4/38 D Canundrum

22. _____ is a belief that a specific nation, language, or culture is superior to allothers.

4/38 A Buddhism

13/38 B Nationalism

1/38 C Colonialism

6/38 D Imperialism

23. The _____ was one of the reasons President Wilson asked Congress to declarewar on Germany.

5/38 A Zimmerman Note

6/38 B Battle of the Marne

1/38 C Sussex Pledge

14/38 D Sedition Act

24. _____ is a policy of aggressive military preparedness.

11/38 A Militarism

5/38 B Communism

0/38 C Marxism

10/38 D Socialism

of 29

25. An alliance between which countries comprised the Central Powers? Select allthat apply.

6/38 A Russia

17/38 B Germany

6/38 C France

12/38 D Austria-Hungary

26. The _____ outlawed actions against the U.S. government.

15/38 A Anti-Loyalty Act

7/38 B Sedition Act

1/38 C Traitor Act

3/38 D Espionage Act

27. Which of the following were causes of World War I? Select all that apply.

13/38 A Militarism, growing military forces in many countries in Europe

16/38 B Imperialism and competition over foreign trade

13/38 C Increasing nationalism in Europe

12/38 D Alliances which caused minor skirmishes between nations to become major battles

28. After World War I, many ethnic groups in Europe wanted _____ or the right todecide their own political status.

15/38 A Independence

5/38 B Individualism

6/38 C Self-Determination

2/38 D Sole-Discretion

29. One idea of President Wilson's was to create a _____ to be a congress of nationsto settle international disputes and maintain peace and collective security.

9/38 A League of Nations

4/38 B World Peace Organization

6/38 C United Nations

6/38 D Congress of World Negotiations

30. The last major offensive of World War I by the Germans was the _____.

8/38 A First Battle of the Marne

8/38 B Second Battle of the Marne

3/38 C Battle of Appomattox

7/38 D Battle on the Rhine

of 29

31. The longest battle of World War I which lasted over 10 months fought aroundthis city or fortress was the _____.

6/38 A Second Battle of Marne (July 1918)

15/38 B Battle of Verdun (February 1916)

5/38 C First Battle of Marne (September 1914)

1/38 D Battle of the Argonne Forest (September 1918)

32. The _____ was an agency created by President Woodrow Wilson in 1917 toincrease public support for the war.

7/38 A Committee on Public Information

10/38 B National War Labor Board

3/38 C War Industries Board

4/38 D Agency of Political Reform

33. President Wilson created the _____ to settle disputes between workers andmanagement to prevent strikes.

10/38 A War Industries Board

7/38 B Liberty Board

1/38 C Sedition Board

9/38 D National War Labor Board

34. A(n) ______ is a truce between warring groups or countries.

5/38 A Reparation

8/38 B Armistice

6/38 C Propaganda

7/38 D Stalemate

35. The final peace settlement of World War I was the _____.

4/38 A Treaty of Brest-Litovsk

7/38 B North Atlantic Treaty

2/38 C Treaty of Paris

12/38 D Treaty of Versailles

36. Russia _____ for war when Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia.

0/38 A lobbied

7/38 B mobilized

10/38 C negotiated

7/38 D stalemated

of 29

37. In May 1915 a U-boat sank the British passenger liner _____ off the coast ofIreland. The U.S. and President Wilson were outraged.

8/38 A Titanic

1/38 B Sussex

3/38 C Searay

13/38 D Lusitania

38. President Wilson outlined a plan for postwar Europe and proposed a system toavoid future wars. This plan was called the _____.

4/38 A Ounce of Prevention Plan

5/38 B Fourteen Points

4/38 C Preventive Measures Plan

12/38 D World Security Plan

39. An example of _____ is when Britain and Germany competed to build a largernavy.

3/38 A Balance of Power

1/38 B Reparations

3/38 C Stalemate

17/38 D Militarism

40. Germany's fleet of _____, or submarines, was the world's largest and mostadvanced and caused heavy losses to Allied shipping during World War I.

17/38 A U-Boats

7/38 B Submersive Vessels

0/38 C Divers

2/38 D John Boats

41. World War I has often been described as an “unnecessary war.” Why? Do youagree?

nando

the french peolpe

Elias Garcia

.

kian martin

hftgdrewqrdg

ibarra,evelin

Had the Germans not given the "green light" to Austria-Hungary, or the Kaiser had not decided totake a mini-vacation, the whole mess might well have been avoided.

of 29

Elias Garcia

yea

Ali Aljabri

z

angela

idk

Jonathan gomez

This had to do with a lack of understanding about how much warfare had changed since the navalrivalry between them was dwarfed by agreement

keren reyes

Yes, that the war wasn't needed because someone else caused the war.

luis romero

no bc we inproved are airplanes and guns

christian,tapia

World War I was called "the Great War" not just for its epic scale but also for the sense that it was amore important and meaningful conflict than earlier European wars. The carnage created by thewar was unprecedented, and it resulted in significant changes throughout the world.

ariana asta

i dont think so i think it is very inportant because so many people died to stop it

Phuong Ha

yes, i agree because a lot people killed in WW1.

habeb

idk

Ulises Herrera-Moreno


Vang Lucas

Yea, because the way is started was stupid and ¨Unnecessary¨.

Huang Jiayi

I disagree,beacuse this was made many countries lost their lands or got more lands,and during thattime,the technologies is improved

Angel Lopez

Im agree because it made a lot of damage, destructions and deaths between countries, howeverboth the entente and the central powers treated the prospect of war very flippantly. Soldiers'journals from the outbreak reflected a general belief that the war would be very quick.

reuven rasmee

of 29

yes because no war is necessary

karla angulo

World War I has been called unnecessary because the original dispute that triggered the conflict waslimited, yet it triggered a massive, global war. In short, the conflict stemmed merely fromAustria-Hungary and Serbia’s disagreement over how to handle the assassination of ArchdukeFerdinand: the Austro-Hungarian government believed that the Serbian government was connectedwith the assassination and therefore demanded to be involved in the investigation and judicialprocess within Serbia.

Dillen Chhum

Because it was fought over one person

FNU, ROMAN

Both the entente and the central powers treated the prospect

Meralda S.

i dont know

My Ho


krizia abadilla

yes because austria-hungary took it as an insult of assassinating the archduke

juan hernandez

Yes, i agree because it wasn't equal.

42. Consider the role of diplomacy in World War I. How was it a positive influence?How was it a negative one?

nando

they had alot more weapons

Elias Garcia

.

kian martin

friday

ibarra,evelin

Although diplomacy is used to prevent armed conflicts from happening, in the case of World War I, itin many ways played the opposite role, whether intended or not. For example, few of the combatantnations in World War I were directly interested in the disputes between Serbia and Austria-Hungary

Ali Aljabri

a

angela

Although diplomacy is used to prevent armed conflicts from happening, in the case of World War

of 29

Jonathan gomez

posible we made air planes and way to move to differnt places, bad that we started geting better atkilling each other and a lot of reaction with the bombs and gases

Rodriguez, Bladimir

Positive: Solidarity to find the peace.

Negative: Bad representions

keren reyes

Causes Although the United States did not enter World War I until 1917, the outbreak of that war in1914, and its underlying causes and consequences, deeply and immediately affected America'sposition both at home and abroad. In the debate on neutrality and later on peace aims, much wasmade of European secret diplomacy, which was rejected on the U.S. side of the Atlantic, ofmilitarism and the escalating arms race before 1914, and of the impact of colonialism. Undoubtedly,all these factors contributed to the origins of the European catastrophe, but they do not explain whythe war broke out when it did. This question can only be answered more precisely by looking at thepolitical and military decision‐making processes in the last months, weeks, and days of peace in1914.

luis romero

im not sure

christian,tapia

It was positive becuase they protected their countries and fought hard and negative is that therewas a lot of war happening and alot of countries were involved.

ariana asta

.

Phuong Ha

I'd say that the diplomacy did not have a negative impact - it was the lack of diplomacy

habeb

idk

Vang Lucas

idk

Huang Jiayi

I don't know

Ernesto Morales

No one had a stake in the dispute between Serbia and Austro-Hungary. Russia only got involvedbecause of its traditionally good relations with Serbia. Even then, they advocated a peaceful solution. It was only because the A-H ultimatum was written with the purpose of being rejected, that theydecided to protect Serbia.

Angel Lopez

Consider the role of diplomacy in world war 1 no one a stake in the dispute between Serbia andAustro-Hungary, even they advocated a paceful solution.I think that the diplomacy did not have a negative impact. it was the lack of diplomacy.

of 29

reuven rasmee

it was war for no reason

karla angulo

Higham & Showalter (2003) observe that the First World War commenced on 4th Aug. 1914 and wasa halted in 11th Nov. 1918, this has implies that it lasted for four and a quarter years. WW1 saw sixtysovereign states taking part and in the end, four empires including Hapsburg Empire, RussianEmpire, German Empire and Turkish Empire were overthrown.

Dillen Chhum

lthough diplomacy is used to prevent armed conflicts from happening, in the case of World War I, itin many ways played the opposite role, whether intended or not. For example, few of the combatantnations in World War I were directly interested in the disputes between Serbia and Austria-Hungary

FNU, ROMAN

few of the combatant nations in World War I were directly interested in the disputes between Serbiaand Austria-Hungary

Ashley D

Even though many countries in Europe, before the emergence of aggression in July 1914, hadfeatured an intense political and ideological rivalry between socialist and liberalist "parties ofmovement" and conservatively affiliated "parties of order" the societies tended to move together insupport of the state's defense once it was apparent that war had irrupted it.

My Ho

idk

krizia abadilla

neither of it,because diplomacy used to prevent armed conflicts from happening.

juan hernandez

Many attempts at self-improvement can fall flat due to the various influences in our lives. If you’reready to make changes to your life, reduce stress and recover from adrenal fatigue, one of the firststeps is addressing those influences, which can be either good or bad.

April

Although diplomacy is used to prevent armed conflicts from happening. No one had a stake in thedispute between Serbia and Austro-Hungary.

43. What is trench warfare, and why was so much of World War I dominated bythis method of fighting? Consider such elements as technology, strategy, attitudesof leaders, and any other factors you can think of. How did trench warfare affect theduration of the war?

Elias Garcia

.

kian martin

ukjyhtgrfdsfergtdyfgu

ibarra,evelin

gm;g]

of 29

Elias Garcia

Trench warfare is a type of land warfare using occupied fighting lines consisting largely of trenches,in which troops are significantly protected from the enemy's small arms fire and are substantiallysheltered from artillery. The most famous use of trench warfare is the Western Front in World War I.

Ali Aljabri

o

angela

World War I 1914–18 Causes Although the United States did not enter World War I until 1917, theoutbreak of that war in 1914, and its underlying causes and consequences, deeply and immediatelyaffected America's.

Jonathan gomez

onsider such elements as technology, strategy, attitudes of leaders, and any other factors you canthink

Rodriguez, Bladimir

they affect the war in many ways, it starting from the point that the battles between countries hadmany days of duration, this caused hard fights through the air and on the ground

keren reyes

History remembers trench warfare as wasteful, futile, and uninspired, but in reality it was a deeplythought-out system that underwent constant revision. Here's how it worked during World War I.

luis romero

better everything

christian,tapia

Trench warfare is a type of land warfare using occupied fighting lines consisting largely of trenches,in which troops are significantly protected from the enemy's small arms fire and are substantiallysheltered from artillery.

ariana asta

Trench warfare was when the soldiers would sit in large dug out holes and pop their heads up toshoot at the enemies. They did this because the flat land they were fighting on held no place to hideor conduct surprise attack.

Phuong Ha

Trench Warfare is most commonly used in WWI and was not a war of velocity. It consisted of deathbecuase of infections from trench water

habeb

idk


the affect tha war in many ways it starting from the point that the battle between couitries hadmany dats of duration

Vang Lucas

of 29

Trench Warfare is a type of combat in which opposing troops fight from trenches facing each other.Trench Warfare was the most dominate because it has tanks, weapons, etc. It was the mostimportant.

Huang Jiayi

To avoid too much death,

Angel Lopez

the trench warfare is a type of combat in which opposing troops fight from trenches facing eachother. It was a method of fighting because they tried to conquist a no-name land to make their ownporpuses to could fight.It made the war longer, because at times soldiers could be 100metresunderground making it harder for enemies to kill them.

reuven rasmee

trench warfare was war on the ground

karla angulo

Getting a car title loan with TitleMax is easy! The process can be completed in as little as 30 minutesto get you the cash you need!

Dillen Chhum

trench war was useless because you werent talking any land.

FNU, ROMAN

History remembers trench warfare as wasteful, futile, and uninspired, but in reality it was a deeplythought-out system that underwent constant revision. Here's how it worked during World War I.

Ashley D

Trench Warfare is most commonly used in WWI and was not a war of velocity. It consisted of deathbecuase of infections from trench water: rain water that stayed in the trenches and often infectedcuts.

My Ho

idk

Carlos sanchez

trench wars a dumb way of fighting a war when no one was gaining any territory

krizia abadilla

basically both fighting sides would dig out trenches about forty feet or so from each other andwould basically live there. Machine gun nests were set up all around so if anyone tried to run acrossthe middle they would be gunned down.

juan hernandez

Trench Warfare is most commonly used in WWI and was not a war of velocity.Trench warfare madethe war longer, because at times soldiers could be 100 metres

44. After the war, Germany was punished much more severely than were theremnants of Austria-Hungary. Do you think this was reasonable? In your answer,consider the roles each country shared in starting and escalating the war. Alsoconsider the roles of Serbia and Russia.

Elias Garcia

of 29

.

kian martin

they got killed

ibarra,evelin

koejirpqnb klw2[;fkjwnm

Ali Aljabri

a

angela

idk

Jonathan gomez

yes and no because theyb were making so much mony that it didnt have a valible

keren reyes

Russia and Germany were the next to get involved, not because of animosity ... was punished muchmore severely than were the remnants of Austria-Hungary

luis romero

idk

christian,tapia

As you correctly point out, the other Central Powers were relatively weak and relatively poor. It wasalso true that France and Britain feared German militarism after the 1870 Franco-Prussian War andsought to prevent Germany from rearming through punitive sanctions.

ariana asta

yes because serbia and russia were together

Phuong Ha

Yes, it was reasonable for Germany to be punished more than Austria and Hungary but Germanywas punished way too much overall.It was reasonable for Germany to be punished more because.....It was the main fighter for the Central Powers, Austria-Hungary probably only doing 1/3 of thefighting to Germany's 2/3.

habeb

idk

Vang Lucas

Yes, because the was the cause of starting the war.

Huang Jiayi

yes.they joined many wars during ww1

Ernesto Morales

of 29

Yes, it was reasonable for Germany to be punished more than Austria and Hungary but Germanywas punished way too much overall.It was reasonable for Germany to be punished more because It was the main fighter for the CentralPowers, Austria-Hungary probably only doing 1/3 of the fighting to Germany's 2/3.

Angel Lopez

I think this is reasonable because Germany had more impact to the world war 1 than the austriahungary althought that they made one of the first cause od the wordls war 1

reuven rasmee

germany made it worst

karla angulo

Was not reasonable because they did not have to chastise them anymore if they had already hadthe war and had lost a lot of people they should not have them punished.

Dillen Chhum

Germany was punished much more severely than were the remnants of Austria-Hungary. Do youthink this was reasonable? In your answer, consider the roles each country shared in starting andescalating the war. Also consider the roles of Serbia and Russia.

FNU, ROMAN

consider the roles each country shared in starting and escalating the war. Also consider the roles ofSerbia and Russia.

Meralda S.

idk

Ashley D

idk

My Ho

idk

krizia abadilla

yes it was reasonable because Germany was the fighter of the central allies. Germany is stronger &richer than austria,has way more stronger armies than austria,germany is the one to decide for thecentral allies and germany was to blame for widening the war between austria-hungary vs serbiaand possibly russia to a European wide conflict.

juan hernandez

The war started when they both caught one another.

45. How did the use of new technologies during World War I influence the war?Which sides benefited the most from which technologies? Did any of them play arole in either lengthening or in shortening the war? Which technologies were themost important?

Elias Garcia

dont know

kian martin

of 29

they had new guns

ibarra,evelin

g frmne.dwlnv ,fm.de/

Ali Aljabri

b

angela

idk

Jonathan gomez

during World War I influence the war Which sides benefited the most from which technologies Didany of them play a role in either lengthening or in shortening the war Which technologies were themost important?

keren reyes

Gas Mask and A Browning Machine Gun

christian,tapia

idk

ariana asta

it helped alot to advance so they can trade to get better things.

habeb

idk

Elias Garcia

don

Vang Lucas

It was a more efficient way of killing enimeies. Entente. No I don think so. The Planes were in myopinion.

Huang Jiayi

Invented many inventions,

Ernesto Morales

The machine gun and the tank were new technologies that influenced WW1 the most. The machinegun lengthened the war and forced it to become a "trench war. The generals of WW1 still used 19thcentury tactics when attacking, frontal assaults against fortified defensive positions by soldiers inlinear columns. However the machine gun made this tactic obsolete. The Battle of the Somme is anexample. The British suffered 57,000+ casualties on the first day of the battle by making frontalassaults against the German defensive line, 90% of those casualties was from the machine gun.The machine gun forced the war into a stalemate which prolonged the war. The tank was inventedas a way to overcome the trenches.Once tactics were learned and developed to take advantage of the use of massed tanks breakingthrough the trench system, the tank shortened the war. The machine gun benefited the Germans,but the tank benefited the Allies.

Angel Lopez

of 29

It changed the entire face of these battles. The major impact of technology on World War I was thatit made the war much more difficult for the infantry soldiers who did most of the fighting. The newtechnologies led to trench warfare and the lack of new tactics led to massive slaughter at the handsof the new and better technology. The machine gun and the tank were the new technologies thatinfluenced WW1 the most. The machine gun lengthened the war and forced it to become a trenchwar.Both sides benefited from the new technologies. Machine guns shorten the war because morepeople were getting killed.

reuven rasmee

lengthening the war

karla angulo

The use of technology during WW1 played a significant role in who won. It changed the entire faceof battle. You could no longer march in a line and fire at each other. One machine gun could wipeout the entire line. The major impact of technology on World War I was that it made the war muchmore difficult for the infantry soldiers who did most of the fighting.

Dillen Chhum

The use of technology during WW1 played a significant role in who won. It changed the entire faceof battle.

FNU, ROMAN

The use of technology during WW1 played a significant role in who won. It changed the entire faceof battle. You could no longer march in a line and fire at each other. One machine gun could wipeout the entire line.

Meralda S.

idk

Ashley D

the major impact of tecnology on World War I was that it made the war much more difficult for theinfantry soldiers who did most of the fighting. the most important and the ones who got moreimpact were the guns and tanks

My Ho

the use of new technology during WWI played a significiant role in who won. It change the intire faceof battle.You could no longer march in a line an dfire at each other. One mchine gun could wipe outthe entire line. the major impact oc technology on WWI wa sthat it made the war much moredifficult for the inflantry soldiers who did most of the fighting.

Carlos sanchez

new technology of war increased they chances of man soilders dieing in the field

krizia abadilla

it makes them to create more weapon to use at war. the machine gun lengthened the war and thetanks shortend the war. the machine gun and the tank .

juan hernandez

The use of technology during WW1 played a significant role in who won. It changed the entire faceof battle. You could no longer march in a line and fire at each other. One machine gun could wipeout the entire line. The major impact of technology on World War I was that it made the war muchmore difficult for the infantry soldiers who did most of the fighting.

of 29

46. Discuss the U.S. policy on American troops serving in Europe during World WarI. Why do you think American commanders were hesitant to allow U.S. soldiers toserve in British and French regiments? What effect did this policy have on America’srelations with the other Allied countries?

nando

it effected them because they had more troops for the war

Elias Garcia

.

kian martin

tyrhegwfqthjyr5yjuh4t53

ibarra,evelin

bgfredfvf

Ali Aljabri

w

angela

idk

Jonathan gomez

Discuss the U.S. policy on American troops serving in Europe during World War I

Rodriguez, Bladimir

U.S would get more benefits from Britain and France, however, the relation between Germany andU.S was going down since Germany decided to destroy the U.S' ships.

keren reyes

the casualties caused by the British and French commanders.

christian,tapia

They did not want their soldiers to be sent in the most dangerous places instead of the Brits orFrench soldiers. They probably were not that wrong, the temptation was there

ariana asta

because they needed all the help they could get.

Phuong Ha

They did not want their soldiers to be sent in the most dangerous places instead of the Brits orFrench soldiers. They probably were not that wrong, the temptation was there.

habeb

idk

Vang Lucas

idk

of 29

Huang Jiayi

They did not want their soldiers to be sent in the most dangerous places instead of the Brits orFrench soldiers. They probably were not that wrong, the temptation was there. However they alsorefused to learn anything from the same Brits and French, spurning their advices very openly, andthus made exactly the same mistakes those two had made at the beginning of the war and lostnearly as many men in relearning those lessons the hard way as if they had handed over theirtroupes to the Brits and French.

Ernesto Morales

They were worried that the British and French commanders would US troops as cannon fodder topreserve their own troops.The reality was that British and French commanders didn't care whosetroops they used as cannon fodder,including their own.

The effect was that the relationship between Pershing,the overall commander of US troops,andsenior French and British commanders,was not good.It also led to criticism of President Wilson bythe political leaders of the other Allies.

Angel Lopez

The american commanders were hesitant to allow us soldiers to serve british and french regimentsbecause they were allies, and wer fighting together to win the war, also they have some ideas incommon and that made to be allies.this effect made a negative answer between the other countries because they dont were agree

reuven rasmee

because the french and british are working with usa

karla angulo

They did not want their soldiers to be sent in the most dangerous places instead of the Brits orFrench soldiers.

Dillen Chhum


FNU, ROMAN

They probably were not that wrong, the temptation was there. However they also refused to learnanything from the same Brits and French.

Meralda S.


Ashley D

They did not want their soldiers to be sent in the most dangerous places instead of the Brits orFrench soldiers. They probably were not that wrong, the temptation was there. However they alsorefused to learn anything from the same Brits and French, spurning their advices very openly, andthus made exactly the same mistakes those two had made at the beginning of the war

of 29

My Ho


Carlos sanchez

they didnt want their soldiers to die in the most dangerous places

krizia abadilla

because theyre allies and the brits and the french lost a lot of their soldiers.

juan hernandez

They did not want their soldiers to be sent in the most dangerous places instead of the British orFrench soldiers. They probably were not that wrong, the temptation was there.

47. What was the Schlieffen Plan and why was it unsuccessful during World War I?

Elias Garcia

The plan relied upon rapid movement. The resistance of the Belgians and the BEF prevented this.Russia mobilised its troops quicker than expected.

kian martin

schlieffen plan was the pal for the war

ibarra,evelin

The plan relied upon rapid movement. The resistance of the Belgians and the BEF prevented this.Russia mobilised its troops quicker than expected. Within 10 days the Russians had invadedGermany, which meant that the Germans had to switch troops away from western Europe to holdup the Russian invasion.

Ali Aljabri


angela

The plan relied upon rapid movement. The resistance of the Belgians and the BEF prevented this.Russia mobilised its troops quicker than expected.

Jonathan gomez

The resistance of the Belgians and the BEF prevented this. Russia mobilised its troops quicker thanexpected. Within 10 days the Russians had invaded Germany

keren reyes


of 29

christian,tapia


ariana asta

i dont remeber learning this

habeb

idk

Vang Lucas

The Schlieffen Plan was the German army's plan for war against France and Russia . It was createdby the German Chief of Staff Alfred von Schlieffen in 1903 the request of Kaiser Wilhelm II. It wasrevised in 1905.

Huang Jiayi

The resistance of the Belgians and the BEF prevented this.

Ernesto Morales


Angel Lopez


reuven rasmee

they fought in planes

karla angulo


Dillen Chhum


FNU, ROMAN


of 29

Ashley D

The Schlieffen Plan called for a massive attack through Belgium to envelop and destroy the Frencharmy while just holding off the Russians. Once France was defeated, Germany could concentrate itsarmies against Russia. The plan failed because Germany's wartime leaders weakened the attack toprotect other parts of the line from threats. In the end, the attack was too weak to succeedcompletely.

My Ho


Carlos sanchez

britain declared war

krizia abadilla

the schlieffen plan is the germanys plan for WW1 which is called for a massive attack throughbelgium, destroy the french army while holding off the russians. Germanyś wartime leadersweakend the attack to protect other parts of the line from the threats.

juan hernandez

The plan relied upon rapid movement. The resistance of the Belgians and the BEF prevented this.

April

The Schlieffen Plan was Germany's War Plan for World War I. Germany expected to fight a war ontwo fronts, vs, France and Russia. The Schlieffen Plan called for a massive attack through Belgium toenvelop and destroy the French army while just holding off the Russians. The plan failed becauseGermany's wartime leaders weakened the attack to protect other parts of the line from threats.

48. How did nationalism and military buildup contribute to the outbreak of war in1914?

nando

they ha

Elias Garcia

Nationalism led to arrogance among the citizens of various nations by promoting a sense thatpeople of a particular country were superior to those of other nations and by giving people theimpression that they could win any war thanks to their togetherness.

kian martin

an army

ibarra,evelin

lkbnjopkg[r3jhbr3ipojkh3lopefkn,sewk;l

Elias Garcia


Ali Aljabri

of 29

Nationalism led to arrogance among the citizens of various nations by promoting a sense thatpeople of a particular country were superior to those of other nations and by giving people theimpression that they could win any war thanks to their togetherness. Other factors that contributedto causing World War I include imperialism and militarism

angela


Jonathan gomez

Nationalism led to arrogance among the citizens of various nations by promoting a sense thatpeople of a particular country were superior to those of other nations

keren reyes

Nationalism led to arrogance among the citizens of various nations by promoting a sense thatpeople of a particular country were superior to those of other nations and by giving people theimpression that they could win any war thanks to their togetherness. Other factors that contributedto causing World War I include imperialism and militarism.

luis romero

war

christian,tapia


ariana asta

imperialism, nationalism and militarism were all political situations that European countries weredealing with. They were taking over each other's territories, building up their defenses and hadpeople that were so loyal to their own nation they would do anythng for their own country. This iswhere the assination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand comes in. An extreme-nationalist, Gavrilo Principshot him and his wife, Sophie. Everyone started blaming each other and a war resulted.

Phuong Ha

A build-up of military might occurred among European countries before World War 1 broke out.Nationalism encouraged public support for military build-ups and for a country's use of force toachieve its goals.

habeb

pop t out


idk

Vang Lucas

it was one of the main causes of the war.

Huang Jiayi

it made Germany pay for all reparation to the Allies.

Ernesto Morales

of 29


Angel Lopez

Nationalism is an extreme form of patriotism and loyalty to one’s country. Nationalists place theinterests of their own country above the interests of other countries. Nationalism was prevalent inearly 20th century Europe and was a significant cause of World War I. Most pre-war Europeansbelieved in the cultural, economic and military supremacy of their nation.

reuven rasmee

so much going on

karla angulo


Dillen Chhum


FNU, ROMAN

Nationalism and extreme patriotism have been cited as the major causes of World War I. Thesefactors led each of the Europe’s great powers to develop a strong but extreme belief in its owncultural, economic and military supremacy. Nationalism and patriotism also led to competitionamong European nations for the largest army and navy, or the largest industrial development.

Ashley D

nationalism contribute by an extreme form of patriotsm and loyalty

My Ho


krizia abadilla

nationalism encourage the public to support for military build-ups and for a countryś to use force toachieve its goals.

juan hernandez

Nationalism led to among the citizens of nations by promoting a sense that people of a particularcountry were superior to those of other nations and by giving people the impression that they couldwin any war thanks to their together.

April

World War I lasted for 4 years between 1914 and 1918 the start of this war was militarism, thoughboth imperialism and nationalism played Politicians, royals and diplomats did little to deflate thepublic appetite for war.

of 29

49. Explain the role of Germany's "blank check," Austria's ultimatum to Serbia, andRussia's mobilization in starting the war.

nando

they had the

Elias Garcia

.

kian martin

the blank check was Austrian Foreign Ministry

ibarra,evelin

On July 6th, Wilhelm II and his Imperial Chancellor, Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg, telegrammedBerchtold that Austria-Hungary could rely that Germany would support whatever action wasnecessary to deal with Serbia -- in effect offering von Berchtold a 'blank check.'

Ali Aljabri

.

angela

The assassination had been carried out by those wishing to unite all of the territories with majoritySouth Slavic population not already ruled by the Kingdom of Serbia or Kingdom of Montenegro.

Jonathan gomez

because their president got killed

Rodriguez, Bladimir

Germany had to pay everything for the war and blank check means that Germany had to paywithout say a word

keren reyes

The assassination had been carried out by those wishing to unite all of the territories with majoritySouth Slavic population not already ruled by the Kingdom of Serbia or Kingdom ofMontenegro.[1][2] Austria-Hungary's post-assassination ultimatum was part of a coercive programmeant to weaken the Kingdom of Serbia's threat to take control of the northern Balkans and itssignificant Southern Slavic population, especially the Bosnian Serbs.

christian,tapia

is an infamous episode in the history of the First World War; the first truly fatal error made byGermany – a promise of unconditional support for whatever action Austria-Hungary might take topunish

ariana asta

i dont remember

Phuong Ha

Germany Gives Austria-Hungary a “Blank Check” The “blank check” is an infamous episode in thehistory of the First World War; the first truly fatal error made by Germany – a promise ofunconditional support for whatever action Austria-Hungary might take to punish Serbia.

habeb

of 29

idk


he July Crisis was a diplomatic crisis among the major powers of Europe in the summer of 1914 thatled to World War I

Vang Lucas

IDK

Huang Jiayi

I don't know

Angel Lopez

Germany pledges his country’s unconditional support for whatever action Austria-Hungary choosesto take in its conflict with Serbia, a long-running rivalry thrown into crisis by the assassination, theprevious June 28, of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria and his wife by a Serbian nationalistduring an official visit to Sarajevo, Bosnia.

reuven rasmee

they made a blank check then it lead to a breakout

karla angulo

he July Crisis was a diplomatic crisis among the major powers of Europe in the summer of 1914 thatled to World War I. Immediately after Gavrilo Princip, a Yugoslav nationalist, assassinated ArchdukeFranz Ferdinand, heir presumptive to the Austro-Hungarian throne, in Sarajevo, a series ofdiplomatic maneuverings led to an ultimatum from Austria-Hungary to the Kingdom of Serbia, andeventually to war.

Dillen Chhum

The July Crisis was a diplomatic crisis among the major powers of Europe in the summer of ...Austria-Hungary's post-assassination ultimatum was part of a coercive ..... When asked if Germanywas ready for a war against Russia and France, ... of an Austrian attack against Serbia as the bestway of starting a general war, ..

FNU, ROMAN

Germany declares war on Russia France and Germany order general mobilization.

Meralda S.

im not sure

My Ho

idk

krizia abadilla

the blank checks leading up the outbreak of the first world war in europe. Germany promising theaustria-hungaryś punitive actions towards serbia,even at the cost of war was with russia

juan hernandez

idk.

50. In what ways was the Treaty of Versailles "more of a victor's peace?"

of 29

Elias Garcia

idk

kian martin

uyjtrgewrgtygfes

ibarra,evelin

overall, the versailles treaty kinda failed at bringing peace to europe. It was more of a victor's peacefor france and the expense of the germans. The germans lost a lot of important manufacturingareas to the french, they lost overseas colonies, and their military was restricted. This led to a bigrecession in germany. France benefited more from it. If the peace had been more of a compromisebetween the two, then things would've probably been better.

Ali Aljabri

Best Answer: overall, the versailles treaty kinda failed at bringing peace to europe. It was more of avictor's peace for france and the expense of the germans. The germans lost a lot of importantmanufacturing areas to the french, they lost overseas colonies, and their military was restricted. Thisled to a big recession in germany. France benefited more from it. If the peace had been more of acompromise between the two, then things would've probably been better.

angela

idk

Jonathan gomez

The treaty of versailles was created to cripple germany so that they could In what ways was thetreaty of versailles

Rodriguez, Bladimir

Because it supposed to stop future world wars

keren reyes

In the great plains

luis romero

more peace for frans

christian,tapia

the versailles treaty kinda failed at bringing peace to europe. It was more of a victor's peace forfrance

ariana asta

.

Phuong Ha

It was more of a victor's peace for france and the expense of the germans.

habeb

idk


of 29


Vang Lucas

Because the Allies won.

Huang Jiayi

lands

Ernesto Morales


Angel Lopez

Overall, the versailles treaty kinda failed at bringing peace to europe. It was more of a victor's peacefor france and the expense of the germans. The germans lost a lot of important manufacturingareas to the french, they lost overseas colonies, and their military was restricted. This led to a bigrecession in germany. France benefited more from it. If the peace had been more of a compromisebetween the two, then things would've probably been better.

reuven rasmee

they didnt get anything they wanted

karla angulo

The criminal madness of this peace will drain Germany's national life-blood. It is a shameless blow inthe face of common-sense. It is inflicting the deepest wounds on us Germans as our world lies inwreckage about us

Dillen Chhum


FNU, ROMAN

the versailles treaty kinda failed at bringing peace to europe

Meralda S.

not sure

Ashley D

cuz makes that treary make that the five nations got in a contract of peace

My Ho

of 29

the versailles treaty kinda failed at bringing peace to europe. It was more of a victor's peace forfrance and the expense of the germans. The germans lost a lot of important manufacturing areas tothe french, they lost overseas colonies, and their military was restricted. This led to a big recessionin germany. France benefited more from it. If the peace had been more of a compromise betweenthe two, then things would've probably been better

Carlos sanchez

im not sure

krizia abadilla

it failed bringing peace at europe

juan hernandez

The versailles treaty kinda failed at bringing peace to europe. It was more of a victor's peace forfrance and the expense of the germans.

of 29

Student Quiz Report - Mr. Tyler's Lessons · 2016-11-29 · Austria-Hungary and Serbia’s...

Documents

Transcript of Student Quiz Report - Mr. Tyler's Lessons · 2016-11-29 · Austria-Hungary and Serbia’s...