STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT · Why SLO Assessment in Student Affairs? # 1 Reason – It’s in your...

32
STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT Student Affairs Presented by: Dr. Tara Rose, Director Office of University Assessment University of Kentucky

Transcript of STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT · Why SLO Assessment in Student Affairs? # 1 Reason – It’s in your...

  • STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENTStudent Affairs

    Presented by: Dr. Tara Rose, DirectorOffice of University AssessmentUniversity of Kentucky

  • Overview Levels of Assessment

    Why Student Learning Assessment

    Importance of Student Learning Assessment

    Importance of Intentional Planning

    Student Learning Outcomes in Student Affairs

    2

  • Levels of Assessment Classroom assessment

    • Determination of individual student performance at course level by instructors

    Course assessment• Determination of how well a course is meeting student learning

    outcomes

    Program/Unit assessment• Determination of how well an academic program is meeting student

    learning outcomes• Determination of how well an administrative or educational support

    program is meeting its objectives

    Institutional assessment• Determination of institutional performance

    3

  • Why do Assessment? External drivers

    • Regional and program-level accreditation criteria– Documentation that you have established an effective assessment process that

    leads to continuous improvement– SACSCOC, ABET, AACSB, NCATE

    Internal drivers• Good management• Quality motivation• Knowing where you are• Knowing where you have been• Knowing what is possible and how to get there

    4

  • Importance: Assessment and the University Recruitment—better identify students, help students know

    expectations

    We deliver on our promises

    Continuous improvement

    Be part of a learning and teaching community that is interested in improving programs

    Supports decisions regarding resource allocation

    5

  • Importance: Assessment and the University / Administrators Accreditation - Federal Funds

    Accountability - need to be able to prove you are delivering what is promised. External recognition of the quality.

    Be consistent in providing the education

    Forces the identification of the learning goals for the university

    Preventing the institution from becoming static. Focuses on improvement

    6

  • Importance: Assessment and Faculty To improve your own teaching

    Provides ideas for growth and development of the course

    Allows a group to see how well courses are doing to achieve the goals of a program (compare)

    Discover what support services are missing for the course

    See if the students are learning what is intended

    How teaching translates into learning

    Find weaknesses in the course and program and delivery

    Find weaknesses in student preparation

    Assess what was really learned compared to what was intended

    Are students learning what they are supposed to learn

    Think critically about why students are or are not meeting the learning outcomes and the student needs

    7

  • Importance: Assessment and Students Working together to ensure that they are getting value out of the program/unit. A commitment to the

    student

    A feeling they have a role to play in the program/unit

    Confidence that the current course prepares them for the next course

    Ability to determine whether the students understand goals of outcomes/objectives

    Students gain value from assessment. Gives them an idea of how they are graded.

    Students learn their strengths and weaknesses

    Transparency - they know whether or not they are meeting the outcomes/objectives

    Students take charge of their learning

    Better information about what is being asked of them

    Grading is less arbitrary if tied to learning outcomes

    Helps the professor teach them better

    8

  • Intentional Planning: Mechanics of Assessment Plan

    • Mission – purpose

    • Objectives or Outcomes – what you intend to achieve

    • Methods– how you plan to get there

    Measure • how well are you doing

    Act• Analyze your results • Plan changes• Take action• Assess impact

    9

  • Intentional Planning: Identify Scope of Assessment What should assessment include?

    • Assess resources (facilities, space, students, faculty)• Assess processes (curriculum, advising, co/extra curricular activities)• Assess results (outcomes/objectives – learning, impact, satisfaction,

    service)• Who receives feedback and how (faculty, program, alumni,

    community)

    Academic program assessment typically focuses on student outcomes (learning and program)

    Administrative unit assessment typically focuses on quality of products, processes, and services as well as a focus on student learning outcomes

    10

  • Checklist for Assessment What are you assessing?

    Why are you assessing?

    What do you want to know?

    From whom will you collect the data?

    Who will see the results?

    How will the data be used?

    How often will the data be collected?

    Who will collect the data?

    11

  • Planning is KEY Integrate assessment and improvement processes into existing

    unit strategic planning and budgeting• Assessment is part of continuous improvement

    – Assessment results drive planning and budgeting in the form of annual assessment reporting

    Continuous Improvement of

    Learning

    Strategic Planning

    Budgeting

    12

  • Assessment in Student Affairs

    13

  • Students Affairs Mission

    In order to enhance the academic mission, the Division of Student Affairs collaborates with the University and beyond to create a supportive and challenging environment that provides opportunities for student learning, engagement, and success. Through the provision of high quality programs, services, and facilities, the Division promotes student development and lifelong discovery; celebrates differences; and promotes global citizenship.

    14

  • Why SLO Assessment in Student Affairs?

    # 1 Reason – It’s in your Mission Statement.

    We have integrity in following our mission, vision, and goals. If you claim to promote learning, or have a mission related to student learning, then you must assess learning.

    Is it a struggle? YES!

    Find ways to connect to some kind of student learning

    Operational outcomes are important – need both to tell your story.

    15

  • Why SLO Assessment in Student Affairs? While it is clear from the standard that assessment is at the program level

    for academic programs, institutions should determine the organizational levels at which assessment is useful and efficient for administrative and for academic and student support units. It is incumbent on the institution to explain how this determination follows from its mission and organizational structure (SACSCOC)

    Student affairs professionals are also among the most knowledgeable people on campus for designing and implementing programs to enhance the student learning and success of these students

    It is important to find opportunities where faculty and student affairs can work together in assessing student learning so that the students’ total learning experience can be understood for both accountability and improvement purposes.

    Student affairs staff members need to have more than programs, activities, and experiences they think would contribute to student learning. They need to have the empirical evidence to be confident that these programs, activities, and experiences actually do contribute to student learning.

    16

  • Institutional Mismatch

    Academic units articulate and assess student learning outcomes aligned with the institution’s academic expectations

    Where are the institution’s other expectations – like “tolerance,” “teamwork,” and “the ability to function in an increasingly diverse world” taught and assessed?• Is “taught” even the right word?

    17

  • Shifting Perspectives

    Substitute “learned” for “taught” – and the question becomes: Where are these other outcomes learned and assessed?

    This shifts our perspective to:• Student demonstration emphasis instead of topic-covering• Ability to do or apply supersedes knowing• Shared responsibility for learning• Site of learning becomes less specific; boundaries become more a like

    18

  • After Learning Reconsidered Learning is not exclusively classroom-based

    • Many important outcomes are:– Not taught in the classroom– The result of processes outside the classroom

    “Learning” is a process based on three interdependent student experiences:• Understanding academic content and processes• Student development• Identity formation

    Responsibility for learning:• Exists outside the classroom• Doesn’t always take the same form

    Some entities on campus produce learning, some facilitate learning, some support learning• Thus, responsibility for assessing learning exists outside the classroom as well

    19

  • Learning in Non-Classroom Settings Critical thinking

    Working with others

    Global competence

    Communication

    Adaptability

    Preparation for life-long learning

    Ethical behavior

    20

  • Co-Curricular Learning Outcomes The cognitive and affective competencies we intend students to be

    able to acquire with what they have learned

    Achievement of outcomes indicates institutional and departmental effectiveness• Examples of co-curricular learning outcomes

    Must be:• Intentional• Carefully planned and designed• Coordinated• Carefully implemented• Part of the structure of a student’s experience• Assessed

    21

  • Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) Model

    22

  • Co-Curricular Assessment

    The “Effectiveness Model”• Focus on student performance as a result of – or even within – a

    planned, structured co-curricular activity• Can be based on observation or objective measures• Requires carefully designed and consistent measuring practices

    Apply external standards, like CAS

    Use surveys and questionnaires

    Develop direct measurement strategies

    All of the above

    23

  • Council for the Advancement of Standards (CAS) Standards for 44 functional areas

    Student Outcomes Domains• Knowledge acquisition, construction, integration and application• Cognitive complexity• Intrapersonal development• Interpersonal competence• Humanitarianism and civic engagement• Practical competence

    Dimensions of Outcome Domains

    24

  • Standard(Subject Area)

    (44 total)

    Domains

    Knowledge Acquisition

    Understanding knowledge from a

    range of disciplines

    Connecting knowledge to other knowledge, ideas, and experiences

    Constructing Knowledge

    Relating knowledge to daily life

    Cognitive Complexity

    Critical Thinking

    Reflective Thinking

    Effecting Reasoning

    Creativity

    Intrapersonal Development

    Realistic self-appraisal, self-

    understanding, and self-respect

    Identity Development

    Commitment to ethics and integrity

    Spiritual Awareness

    Interpersonal Competence

    Meaningful relationships

    Interdependence

    Collaboration

    Effective Leadership

    Civic Engagement

    Understanding and appreciation of

    cultural and human differences

    Global perspective

    Social responsibility

    Sense of civic responsibility

    Practical Competence

    Pursuing goals Communicating effectively

    Technological competence

    Managing personal affairs

    Managing Career Development

    Demonstrating Professionalism

    Maintaining health and wellness

    Living a purposeful and satisfying life

  • Example of Student Learning Outcomes

    Domain: • Knowledge acquisition, construction, integration, and application

    Dimension:• Connecting knowledge to other knowledge, ideas, and experiences

    Learning Outcome:• Uses multiple sources of information and their synthesis to solve

    problems; knows how to access diverse sources of information such as the internet, text observations, and data bases

    26

  • Example of Student Learning Outcomes

    Domain: • Intrapersonal development

    Dimension:• Realistic self-appraisal, self-understanding, and self-respect

    Learning Outcome:• Assesses, articulates, and acknowledges personal skills, abilities, and

    growth areas; uses self-knowledge to make decisions such as those related to career choices; articulates rationale for personal behavior; seeks and considers feedback from others; critiques and subsequently learns from past experiences; employs self-reflection to gain insight; functions without need for constant reassurance from others; balances needs of self with needs of others

    27

  • CAS – Assessment & Evaluation

    Program & Services • Assessment Plan

    – clearly articulated stated goals and learning outcomes– demonstrate accountability– evidence of improvement– describe resulting changes

    • Adequate fiscal, human, professional development, and technological resources to develop and implement assessment plans.

    Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education 14 28

  • CAS – Assessment & Evaluation Assessments must include:

    • direct and indirect evaluation • qualitative and quantitative methodologies• existing evidence, as appropriate, to determine whether and to

    what degree the stated mission, goals, and intended outcomes are being met as effectively and efficiently as possible

    • must employ sufficient and sound measures to ensure comprehensiveness.

    • data collected must include responses from students and other constituencies

    • aggregated results must be shared with those groups. • results of assessments must be shared appropriately with

    multiple constituents

    Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education 14 29

  • CAS – Assessment & Evaluation Results of assessments and evaluations must:

    • identify needs and interests in revising and improving programs and services

    • recognizing staff performance• maximizing resource efficiency and effectiveness• improving student achievement of learning and development

    outcomes• improving student persistence and success

    Changes resulting from the use of assessments and evaluation must be shared with stakeholders.

    Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education 14 30

  • Student Affairs Resources The Role of Student Affairs in Student Learning Assessment

    • By: John H. Schuh and Ann M. Gansemer-Topf• http://www.learningoutcomeassessment.org/documents/StudentAffairs

    Role.pdf

    Student Leader Outcomes and Rubrics• Texas A&M University • http://sllo.tamu.edu/rubrics

    Student Affairs Assessment Academy • North Dakota State University • http://www.ndsu.edu/vpsa/assessment/resources_for_assessment/stu

    dent_affairs_assessment_academy/

    31

    http://www.learningoutcomeassessment.org/documents/StudentAffairsRole.pdfhttp://sllo.tamu.edu/rubricshttp://www.ndsu.edu/vpsa/assessment/resources_for_assessment/student_affairs_assessment_academy/

  • Discussion and Questions

    32

    STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT�Student AffairsOverviewLevels of AssessmentWhy do Assessment?Importance: Assessment and the UniversityImportance: Assessment and the University / AdministratorsImportance: Assessment and FacultyImportance: Assessment and StudentsIntentional Planning: Mechanics of Assessment Intentional Planning: Identify Scope of AssessmentChecklist for AssessmentPlanning is KEY�����Assessment in Student Affairs�Students Affairs Mission Why SLO Assessment in Student Affairs?Why SLO Assessment in Student Affairs?Institutional MismatchShifting PerspectivesAfter Learning ReconsideredLearning in Non-Classroom SettingsCo-Curricular Learning OutcomesCollaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) ModelCo-Curricular AssessmentCouncil for the Advancement of Standards (CAS)Slide Number 25Example of Student Learning Outcomes Example of Student Learning Outcomes CAS – Assessment & EvaluationCAS – Assessment & EvaluationCAS – Assessment & EvaluationStudent Affairs Resources�����Discussion and Questions