Student Achievement Results 2016-2017

61
Student Achievement Results 2016-2017 DR. NANCY A. GIGANTE PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLS SCHOOLS SEPTEMBER 2017 1

Transcript of Student Achievement Results 2016-2017

Student Achievement Results

2016-2017DR. NANCY A. GIGANTE

PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLS SCHOOLS

SEPTEMBER 2017

1

Parsippany-Troy Hills

Standardized Assessments

2016-17

PARCC (Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and

Careers)

AP (Advanced Placement)

SAT

ACT

NJASK (New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge)

NJBCT (New Jersey Biology Competency Test)

2

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

English Language Arts/Literacy

Not Yet Meeting Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially Meeting Expectations

(Level 2)

Approaching Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding Expectations

(Level 5)

2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017

Grade 3 7% 4% 5% 11% 11% 7% 22% 24% 20% 50% 51% 57% 10% 9% 11%

Grade 4 3% 3% 2% 7% 7% 4% 17% 20% 13% 53% 51% 51% 19% 18% 30%

Grade 5 2% 2% 2% 8% 6% 6% 20% 21% 16% 58% 60% 58% 12% 11% 18%

Grade 6 1% 3% 2% 8% 7% 7% 25% 19% 17% 49% 51% 52% 17% 20% 21%

Grade 7 3% 2% 4% 8% 9% 6% 18% 15% 10% 40% 35% 38% 31% 39% 42%

Grade 8 4% 3% 2% 8% 7% 5% 17% 15% 13% 50% 43% 42% 22% 32% 37%

Grade 9 8% 4% 6% 11% 8% 9% 19% 21% 21% 43% 47% 46% 19% 19% 18%

Grade 10 12% 18% 16% 11% 12% 12% 18% 18% 16% 37% 35% 36% 23% 17% 21%

Grade 11 6% 22% 21% 7% 16% 17% 13% 23% 23% 38% 27% 30% 35% 12% 9%

3

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

English Language Arts/Literacy – GRADE 3

4

60% 60%

68%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

English Language Arts/Literacy – GRADE 4

5

72%69%

81%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

English Language Arts/Literacy – GRADE 5

6

70% 71%

76%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

English Language Arts/Literacy – GRADE 6

7

66%

71%73%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

English Language Arts/Literacy – GRADE 7

8

71%74%

80%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

English Language Arts/Literacy – GRADE 8

9

72%75%

79%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

English Language Arts/Literacy – GRADE 9

10

62%

66%64%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

English Language Arts/Literacy – GRADE 10

11

60%

52%

57%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

English Language Arts/Literacy – GRADE 11

12

73%

39% 39%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

% Change in Level 1 and Level 2 % Change in Level 4 and Level 5

PTHSD 2016 PTHSD 2017 State 2016 State 2017 PTHSD 2016 PTHSD 2017 State 2016 State 2017

Grade 3 3% 3% 3.4% 2.5% 0% 8% 4.1% 2.5%

Grade 4 0% 4% 0.6% 0.7% 3% 12% 2.4% 2.5%

Grade 5 2% 0% 0.9% 2.4% 1% 5% 1.7% 5.7%

Grade 6 1% 1% 1.9% 0.6% 5% 2% 3.5% 0.7%

Grade 7 0% 1% 3.3% 2.0% 3% 6% 4.7% 2.7%

Grade 8 2% 3% 3.0% 2.1% 3% 4% 3.6% 3.8%

Grade 9 7% 3% 8.7% 1.9% 5% 2% 9.2% 2%

Grade 10 7% 2% 7.8% 9.1% 8% 5% 7.7% 0.6%

Grade 11 25% 0% 1.1% 6.6% 33% 0% 0.9% 3.1%

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

English Language Arts/Literacy

13

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

Mathematics

Not Yet Meeting Expectations

(Level 1)

Partially Meeting Expectations

(Level 2)

Approaching Expectations

(Level 3)

Meeting Expectations

(Level 4)

Exceeding Expectations

(Level 5)

2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017

Grade 3 2% 2% 3% 9% 5% 5% 22% 16% 19% 51% 54% 49% 16% 24% 24%

Grade 4 2% 2% 2% 10% 11% 3% 23% 23% 19% 56% 56% 58% 9% 9% 18%

Grade 5 2% 2% 2% 8% 8% 8% 25% 21% 20% 49% 50% 50% 16% 20% 19%

Grade 6 2% 3% 5% 11% 10% 10% 27% 25% 19% 50% 49% 47% 11% 14% 19%

Grade 7 1% 3% 3% 12% 15% 10% 31% 26% 27% 44% 43% 42% 13% 13% 17%

Grade 8* 9% 8% 12% 20% 17% 14% 34% 27% 31% 37% 48% 41% 1% 1% 1%

Algebra I 8% 6% 3% 17% 10% 11% 23% 24% 22% 46% 49% 55% 6% 11% 9%

Geometry 15% 9% 2% 16% 21% 19% 22% 31% 33% 40% 34% 39% 7% 6% 7%

Algebra II 6% 27% 24% 22% 15% 16% 39% 22% 19% 28% 30% 36% 5% 5% 5%

14

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

Mathematics – GRADE 3

15

67%

78%

73%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

Mathematics – GRADE 4

16

65% 65%

76%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

Mathematics – GRADE 5

17

65%

70% 69%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

Mathematics – GRADE 6

18

61%63%

66%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t–Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

Mathematics – GRADE 7

19

57% 56%59%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

Mathematics – GRADE 8

20

38%

49%

42%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

Mathematics – ALGEBRA 1

21

52%

60%64%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

Mathematics – GEOMETRY

22

47%

40%

46%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

Mathematics – ALGEBRA 2

23

33%35%

41%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

2015 2016 2017

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC

Mathematics

24

% Change in Level 1 and Level 2 % Change in Level 4 and Level 5

PTHSD 2016 PTHSD 2017 State 2016 State 2017 PTHSD 2016 PTHSD 2017 State 2016 State 2017

Grade 3 4% 1% 2.8% 1% 11% 5% 6.8% 1.3%

Grade 4 1% 8% 2.5% 0.6% 0% 11% 5.9% 1.4%

Grade 5 0% 0% 2.3% 0.5% 5% 1% 6.2% 1.2%

Grade 6 0% 2% 1.0% 1% 2% 3% 2.2% 1.1%

Grade 7 5% 5% 0.9% 1.1% 1% 3% 1.9% 1.3%

Grade 8 4% 1% 1.3% 2.8% 10% 7% 2.1% 2.4%

Algebra 1 9% 2% 5.0% 0.1% 8% 4% 5.2% 0.8%

Geometry 1% 9% 6.3% 2.6% 7% 6% 4.6% 3%

Algebra 2 14% 2% 0.1% 1.1% 2% 6% 1.1% 1.9%

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

English Language Arts/Literacy – CURRENT 5TH GRADERS

25

61%

82%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t–Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

English Language Arts/Literacy – CURRENT 6TH GRADERS

26

61%

71%

78%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

English Language Arts/Literacy – CURRENT 7TH GRADERS

27

74%72%

76%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

English Language Arts/Literacy – CURRENT 8TH GRADERS

28

72% 72%

83%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

English Language Arts/Literacy – CURRENT 9TH GRADERS

29

66%

75%

83%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

English Language Arts/Literacy – CURRENT 10TH GRADERS

30

70%

75%

70%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

30% low 4

47% 3 or lower

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

English Language Arts/Literacy – CURRENT 11TH GRADERS

31

69%71%

62%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

15% low 4

50% 3 or lower

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

English Language Arts/Literacy – CURRENT 12TH GRADERS

32

63%

56%

42%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

11% low 4

40% 3 or lower

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

Mathematics – CURRENT 5TH GRADE

33

77% 77%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

Mathematics – CURRENT 6TH GRADE

34

67% 66%

72%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

Mathematics – CURRENT 7TH GRADE

35

66%

71% 70%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

Mathematics – CURRENT 8TH GRADE

36

66% 65%62%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

15% low 4

32% 3 or lower

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

Mathematics – CURRENT 9TH GRADE (6-7-8)

37

34%

30%

43%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

Mathematics – CURRENT 9TH GRADE (6-7-ALGEBRA 1)

38

98% 98% 97%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

Mathematics – CURRENT 10TH GRADE (7-8-ALGEBRA 1)

39

36%

50% 51%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

Mathematics – CURRENT 10TH GRADE (7-ALGEBRA 1-GEOMETRY)

40

97% 99% 96%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

Mathematics – CURRENT 11TH GRADE (8-ALGEBRA 1-GEOMETRY)

41

29%

33%

26%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

19% low 4

43% 3 or lower

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

Spring 2015, Spring 2016, and Spring 2017 PARCC Cohort

Mathematics – CURRENT 11TH OR 12TH GRADE (ALGEBRA 1-GEOMETRY-ALGEBRA 2)

42

53%

44%

39%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fic

ien

t –

Sc

ore

of

4 o

r 5

9% low 4

69% 3 or lower

PARCC PERFORMANCE

Drilling Down the Data

District Summary Report

43

PARCC PERFORMANCE

Drilling Down the Data

Student Roster Report

44

PARCC PERFORMANCE

Drilling Down the Data

Content Standards Roster

45

PARCC PERFORMANCE

Drilling Down the Data

School Evidence Statement Analysis

46

PARCC PERFORMANCE

Drilling Down the Data

School Evidence Statement Analysis

47

PARCC PERFORMANCE

Drilling Down the Data

School Evidence Statement Analysis

Mathematics

ELA

48

PARCC PERFORMANCE

Drilling Down the Data

School Evidence Statement Analysis

U

I

N

49

PARCC PERFORMANCE

Drilling Down the Data

School Evidence Statement Analysis

50

PARCC PERFORMANCE

Drilling Down the Data

School Evidence Statement Analysis

51

Parsippany-Troy Hills

AP (Advanced Placement)

Courses Offered

52

Studio Art Computer Science

Economics Computer Science Principles

English Statistics

Government and Politics Calculus

European history Music Theory

US History Biology

French Chemistry

Italian Environmental Science

Spanish Physics

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

AP

Course Participation Rate*

53

* 11th or 12th grade students who took at least one AP course

36.339.1

41.544.1

47.7 49.2

38.3 39.7 39.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nt

Takin

g C

ou

rse

(s)

state comp HS district

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

AP

Testing Participation Rate*

54

*11th and 12th graders who took at least one AP exam in any subject area

30.7 32.334.535.1

39.142.6

29.231.9 33

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Ta

kin

g A

t Le

ast

On

e E

xa

m

state comp HSs district

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

AP

Testing Performance (Students Receiving Score of 3, 4, or 5)*

55

*2015 and 2016 = all students taking AP exams in English, math, social studies, or science2017 = all students taking an AP exam in any subject

No

t a

va

ilab

le

59.8 59.857.5

69.7 69.4 68.9

87.183.5

79.883.7

93.8

88

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Sc

orin

g a

3, 4, o

r 5

nation state comp HSs district

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

AP Testing

Performance (All Tests - Average Score)

56

3.23 3.253.11

3.44 3.42

3.7

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

2015 2016 2017

Ave

rag

e S

co

re R

ec

eiv

ed

1 -

5

nation district

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

SAT

Participation Rate

57

No

t a

va

ilab

le

79.1

58

94.7

85.4

60

94.1

85

62.1

96

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Ta

kin

g S

AT

state comp HSs district

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

SAT

Performance (Average Composite Score)*

58

*Converted to 1600 scale

No

t a

va

ilab

le

10901044

11001075 1056

1160 1144 11631180 1172 1171

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

2015 2016 2017

Ave

rag

e S

co

re R

ec

eiv

ed

400 -

16

00

nation state comp HSs district

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

ACT

Participation

59

59

6460

25.227.6 28.329.1

35.9

40.4

28.9 29.7

35.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2015 2016 2017

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Ta

kin

g A

CT

nation state comp HSs district

Comparison of Parsippany-Troy Hills’

ACT

Performance (Average Score)

60

No

t a

va

ilab

le

21 20.8 21

23.222.5

23.924.5 24.6

23.5 23.2

24.9

1

6

11

16

21

26

31

36

2015 2016 2017

Ave

rag

e S

co

re R

ec

eiv

ed

1 -

36

nation state comp HSs district

No

t a

va

ilab

le

Conversations Moving Forward

61