STS-51C Natonal Space Transportation Systems Promgram Mission Report
-
Upload
bob-andrepont -
Category
Documents
-
view
240 -
download
0
Transcript of STS-51C Natonal Space Transportation Systems Promgram Mission Report
8/7/2019 STS-51C Natonal Space Transportation Systems Promgram Mission Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sts-51c-natonal-space-transportation-systems-promgram-mission-report 1/11
JSC-20393
ri'....s 'p ( ) r ta i i ionSy l fems
Program Mission Report
8/7/2019 STS-51C Natonal Space Transportation Systems Promgram Mission Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sts-51c-natonal-space-transportation-systems-promgram-mission-report 2/11
JSC-20393
STS 51-C
NATIONAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PROGRAM
MISSI ON REPOR T
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~Michael A. Collins, Jr.
Manager, Shuttle Data
and Evaluation Office
A. D
Manager, Spa e Shuttle Projects
--~~-Z-~-'Glynn S. Lunney
nager, National STS Program
8/7/2019 STS-51C Natonal Space Transportation Systems Promgram Mission Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sts-51c-natonal-space-transportation-systems-promgram-mission-report 3/11
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
INTRODUCTION AND MISSION OBJECTIVES ••••••••••••• 1
MISS ION SUMMARY ••••••••••••••••••• • • •• 1
VEHICLE ASSESSMENT •
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
3SOLID ROCK ET BOOSTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .EXTERNAL TANK • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 3
SPACE SHUTTLE MAIN ENGINE • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 3
]mproper Moding and Timing in BFS ••
TACAN 3 Failed to Lock Up During Entry
. . . . . . . . . . . .
4
4
4
MAIN PROPULSION SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ORBITER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . • • • • • • • • 4
Radar Altimeter 2 Was Erratic At High Altitude •••••••• 4
8/7/2019 STS-51C Natonal Space Transportation Systems Promgram Mission Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sts-51c-natonal-space-transportation-systems-promgram-mission-report 4/11
IN TRODUC TION AN D MISSIO N OBJEC TIV ES
The STS 51~C National Space Transportation System Program Mission Report
contains a summary of the Orbiter, ET (external tank), SRB (solid rocket
booster), and SSME (Space Shuttle main engine)/MPS (main propulsion system)
systems operation for the fifteenth Space Shuttle mission, which was also
the third flight of the Orbiter vehicle, Discovery (OV-103). Because of
the security classification assigned to this mission, this report contains no
discussion of any of the mission activities or accomplishments.
Table I contains a partial sequence of events, including only those activitiesthat are unclassified. Additionally, this report contains a discussion of the
most significant Orbiter problems/anomalies. Table II is a listing of all
unclassified Orbiter problems/anomalies. Table III is the Marshall Space Flight
Center problem tracking list.
MISS ION SU MMARY
The STS 51-C mission was launched on January 24 , 1985, at 19:50:00 G.m.t.,
1 hour and 35 minutes into the 3-hour launch window. The flight was originallyscheduled to be launched on January 23, 1985, but because the expected cold
temperatures might cause ice formations on the vehicle, the launch was delayed
until January 24, 1985.
The crew for the STS S1-C mission were Thomas K. Mattingly, Capt., U.S. Navy,
Commander; Loren J. Shiver, Maj., U.S. Air Force, Pilot; Ellison S. Onizuka,
Maj., U.S. Air Force, and James F . Buchli, Maj., U.S. Air Force, Mission
Specialist; and Gary E. Payton, Maj., U.S. Air F orce, Payload Specialist.
The countdown phase was completed satisfactorily, however, two minor Orbiter
problems were noted during that period. The first occurred during the T-3 hour
hold and involved a force fight in the right inboard elevon actuator between
8/7/2019 STS-51C Natonal Space Transportation Systems Promgram Mission Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sts-51c-natonal-space-transportation-systems-promgram-mission-report 5/11
TABLE I. - STS SI-C SEQUENCE OF EVENT
Parameter
APU Activation (1)(2)
(3)
SRB HPU activation command (LH-Al)
MPS start command sequence (engine 3)
SRB ignition command from GPC (lift-off)
MPS throttle-down to 92-percent (engine 3)
MPS throttle-down to 65-percent (engine 3)
Maximum dynamic pressure
MPS throttle-up to 104-percent (engine 3)
SRB separation command from GPC
MPS throttle-down from 3g acceleration (engine 3)Main engine cutoff (MECO)
External tank separation
APUdeactivation (1)
(2)
(3)
Flight control system checkout APU 2 start
APU 2 shutdownAPU 3 activation
-----.--APU activation (1)
(2)
Ent ry In ter face
E nd bl ac ko ut
G .m .t ., h r:m in :s ec
024:19:45:08
024:19:45:09
024:19:45:10024:19:49:32.14
024:19:49:53.44
024:19:50:00
024:19:50:15.48
024:19:50:29.4
024:19:50:52
0 24 : 1 9: 5 1 : 0 1 .0 8
024:19:52:07
024:19:57:34.54024:19:58:32
024:19:58:49
024:20:06:15
024:20:06:17
024:20:06:14
026:22:15:02
026:22:20:20
027:20:11:03
027:20:39:29027:20:39:28
027:20:52:29
027:21:08:16
8/7/2019 STS-51C Natonal Space Transportation Systems Promgram Mission Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sts-51c-natonal-space-transportation-systems-promgram-mission-report 6/11
At external tank separation, the BFS (backup flight system) did notautomatically pro~eed to major mode 104. The crew performed the necessary
manual procedures, and the BFS operated satisfactorily until the deorbit
maneuver when the BFS time for deorbit maneuver ignition was 8 seconds late.
However, the BFS operated satisfactorily for entry.
The entry phase systems operations were satisfactory with the Orbiter landing on
runway 15 at Kennedy Space Center at 027:21:23:23 G.m.t. (4:23 p.m.e.s.t.) on
January 27, 1985 •. The rollout distance was 7352 ft. An inspection of the
Orbiter after landing showed the vehicle to be in excellent condition.
V EH IC LE A SS ES SM EN T
SOLID ROCKET BOOSTER
All SRB systems performed as expected. The SRB prelaunch countdown was nominal
with no problems noted. Performance of both SRM's (solid rocket motors) was
close to predicted values and well within the allowable envelopes.
The average head pressures during the first 20 seconds as well as the propellant
burn rates were approximately 1.0-percent below predicted values, thus resulting
in longer than predicted web and action times. Preliminary indications are that
the SRB separation occurred approximately 1.7 seconds later than predicted. The
SRB recovery system performed nominally, with both SRB's reported floating in
the normal manner.
EXTERNAL TANK
All ET systems performed as expected. There were no ET preflight or flight
anomalies. There was some ice/frost buildup observed as predicted, however,
the vehicle was clean at lift-off.
8/7/2019 STS-51C Natonal Space Transportation Systems Promgram Mission Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sts-51c-natonal-space-transportation-systems-promgram-mission-report 7/11
Improper Moding and Timing in BFS
The BFS did not automatically proceed to major mode 104 after ET separation.
The condition was nQted, and the crew manually made the mode change. The
criteria for the mode change is a 3.6 ft/sec velocity change after receiving the
ET separation indication. Assuming worst case timing and maximum acceleration
in the early porti6n of the separation maneuver, analysis indicates that the BFS
sensed only 3.5 of the required 3.6 ft/sec velocity change. For STS 51-E, nochange will be made to the software and the crew will be instructed to manually
proceed to the major mode 104, if the same problem recurs.
Also, the BF S TIG (ignition time) for the deorbit manuever was 8 seconds later
than the PASS (primary avionics software system). The TIG for the deorbit
maneuver ended on an even minute and the zero seconds were not entered by the
crew. As a result, the burn time for a previous maneuver which occurred 8
seconds after the even minute was still present in the register. The crew will
be instructed to enter all digits of maneuver times.
TACAN 3 Failed to Lock Up During Entry
During entry, TACAN 3 was operating in the search mode, but failed to lock up on
the selected ground station. Postflight tests at K ennedy Space Center revealed
r ed uc ed r ec ei ve r s en si ti vi ty .
Radar Altimeter 2 Was Erratic At High Altitude
During the descent phase, RA (radar altimeter) 2 did not lock on the ground
until the vehicle reached an altitude of 2300 feet. Normally, ground-lock
occurs at about 5000 feet. Between 2300 and 1400 feet, ground-lock was
8/7/2019 STS-51C Natonal Space Transportation Systems Promgram Mission Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sts-51c-natonal-space-transportation-systems-promgram-mission-report 8/11
TABLE 11.- JSC OV-I03 STS 51-C PROBLEM TRACKING UST
. . . ~ t " " ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' f ' ' · · ' ' f . · · ++++++ · t ' ' 4 ' ' ' ' ' ' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • , , • • , . + + , • • • • • • • • • • • • , • • • •JSC O V tl03 SIS 51+C PlO lL lM TRACKING LIST PE l 25, 1985
................. ,••••••,••••••••"•••••••t••••••••••••••••••••••••.•,••••"•••••••••,•••••,•••,•••••••••••,••••~ t t • • • • • • • • • • •
I NO . I TITLE I TIME , G .M .T . I COMMENTS I USP. HG a •
•t·••t . , • • • •t.I."tt ••••• ,., ••••••• t '. ~ f • • ' . + tt.t.t•••t t f . , . , • • , • • ' .f·.t '••••••.••~fl't ••••••••••• 't••, .
I
IJ. VERNON
I CAR 20POOI
I CLOSID
I02/20/85
I
I
MASS SPIC IN M ID tBODY INDICATED 11,200 PPM OR I P . corA
ABOUT 0.36 IIM IN . KPS PRESSURE DECAY TEST SHOWEDI CLOSED
N O LEAK . M rS PIESSURES N O R M A L DURIRG LAU llCH . I 02/20/85P RO BA BL E IN TE RF AC E S IA L LEAK A T G IlE QD ON 1J 12 T4 0
UMBILICAL.
1 lIGHT IIBOAID ELEYON C lW lNEL 4
SICO IDA lY DELTA PlISSUR I FORCE
FIGHT.
2 HE LIUM LEAK IN M ID tBODY FROM UNf
D OW II S OU RC E.
1 t NS TR UH lN TA TI ON F AIL U IE S
A APU 1 EIHAUST GAS TEM PIRA TUU 2
(Y 46 T0140 A) F AIL ED .
B SSHE 2 GIl2 O UT UT T EM PE RA TU RE
(Y 41 T1261 A) F AtL ED .
C MAIN BUS "B" FORWARD P O W E R COM+
TROLLER AHHETEI (Y76Cl076A ) VERY
IIOISY.
D IT Ul2 100 PDCIRT LIQ U ID LEVEL
POINT SIISO I (T4111718E) ERRATIC .
4 STS 41+D CARRYOVER :
A LEn OM S FU lL TOTAL Q UANTITY
(V 43 Q4331C ) FA IL ED .
PRELAUNCH
PRELAUNCH
LAUNCH
A PU S TA RT
LAUNCH
FLIGHT DA Y
LAUNCH
LAUNCH
STS 41D+8
fO RCE F IG HT CL EA RE D D URIN G P RE LA UN CH P RO FIL E.
SAME CHARR EL AND SAME AC TUA TOR HAD A P OICE
PIGHT PULAUIICB ON FIRST PLIGHT OFOV+103, JU T
IT CLIAR ID JUST PR IOR TO PRELAUNCH PROFILE .
RU ACTUATOR . CAUSE UNKNOW N.
READ OFF SCALE H IGH AND THEN FAILED LOW. SAME
M EASUREM ENT FAILED OFF SCALE LOW LAST FLIGHT 5
M IN UT ES IE fO RE T OU CH DO WN . S EN SO R W AS RE PL AC ED
PIIOR TO 51+C . REMOYED AND REPLACED .
CLOSURE
IN P RO CE SS
W . SCO TT
CA R 20POO4 ,
R E A D OFF SCALE HIGH A FEW MINUTES AFTER LIFTOFF. P . CorA
TRANSDUCER FAILE D. REM OVED AND REPLACED . . CA R 20F003
R EA D B ET WE EN 105 AND 155 A MP S F OR 1MINUTIS . R . ECUSQ UIZA
FU EL CE LL AND O TH ER F ORWAR D P OW ER C OR '1 'R OL LI R AM PS I
NORMAL. CAUSE URKROWN. FLY AS IS . I
I
READING WAS ERRATIC •. PROBABLE TRANSDUCEI , I. IGUSQ UIZA
PAILURE. I
I
ICLOSURE
I IN PROCESS,STOPPED AT INTERMEDIATE POSITION AFTER OMS.1 , J. HOOPER
SIM ILAR T O TH E LAST FLICHT W HEN PROBE ILECTRO NICS ' CA R 14F005
WERE REPLACED POSTFL IGHT. FLY AS IS . I
8/7/2019 STS-51C Natonal Space Transportation Systems Promgram Mission Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sts-51c-natonal-space-transportation-systems-promgram-mission-report 9/11
T AB LE 11.- J5C OV-I03 STS Sl-C PROB LEM TRACKING LIST
••••"••••t.~ ,.,••,••,•••,••+t+ ++ ++++++ t.~•••,•••'t +++++~++++++ ~ , _., •••JSC OYtl03 STS 51tC PROBLEM TRACKING L IST FEB 25. 1985
"'t••t., •••,••~ , ~ t " ' t ' t t " " f . " • • • •t...... ~..... ~ + ~ + + t ++ + + + + t + + + " t ' . _ • •• •• 't.+++..... +++. . . ~tt•••,......,••,••+ + + ~ ., NO. , TITLE , TIME. G.M. T • , COMMENTS , RESP. HeR.
f + + 4 , . , . t " l t t t ~ , . t• • • • " . , • • t . , • • . •tt+++++t·.~.++t·++"+~ •• "'.,." ••• + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + . + + + " ' . ' . " " . " " " " " " " , I , " "
B RIGHT OMS FUEL TOTAL QUAlfTITY
( V4 3Q 53 31 C) F AI LE D.
C RIGHT OMS OXIDIZER TOTAL QUANTITY
(V 43 Q5 23 1C ) R EA D LO W.
5A BACKUP FLIGHT SYSTEM DID NOT PRO.
CEED TO MAJOR HODE 104 AFTER. E T
SEPARATION.
5B B ACK UP F LI GH T S YS TE M D EOR BI TIGNITION TIME WAS 8 SECONDS LATE.
6 AC I PHASES "A" A N D "B " L O W CURRENT
TRANSIENTS ON WCS FAN SEPARATOR 1.
7 O XY GE N T AN K 2 H EA TE R C ON TR OL
P RE SS UR E ( Y4 5P I2 10 A) F AI LE D
MOMENTARILY.
8 S TA R T RA CK ER . + Y AND . Z S HU TT ER
CLOSURES.
PRELAUNCH
STS+41D
PRELAUNCH
ST5.41D
LAUNCH
DEORBIT
FLIGHT DAY 2
FLIGHT DAY 2
FLIGHT DAY I,
2, AN D 3 (+Y)
FLIGHT DAY 3
(+Z)
FAILED PRIOR TO FIRST FLIGHT ON OV.I03 AND HAS
NEYER BEEN REPAIRED. FLY AS IS.
MEASUREMENT HAS HAD A SHALL ~EGATIVE SCALE
FACTOR ERROR. O F ABOUT 2% FULL SCALE FOR ALL
OV.I03 FLIGHTS. FLY AS IS.
CREW HODED MANUALLY. WORST+CASE TIMING DELAYS
WITH ACCELERATION VARIATIONS COULD CAUSE LOW
BFS SEPARATION VELOCITY INTEGRATION. CHANGE
INTEGRATION CONSTANT. FLY AS IS FOR 51.E.
BFS WAS OPERATIONAL FOR. ENTRY. CREW DID NOTENTER 00 SECONDS FOR DEORBIT TIG LEAVING
08 SECONDS FROM LAST ENTRY. CHIT J+I507.
S IM IL AR T O P RO BLE M ST S+ 5I A· 16 E XCE PT S IG NA TU RE
IS ALSO ON PHASE "B". NO IMPACT ON WCS OPERA.
TION. IN+FLIGHT TROUBLESHOOTING FOUND LOWCURRENT CORRELATED WITH OPERATION OF PANEL
LIGHTS. NO A CT IO N R EQ UI RE D.
READ OFF SCALE LOW FOR A MINUTE CAUSING AN
ONBOARD FSM. RETURNED TO NORMAL. SET LOW
LIMIT AT 500 PSI TO PREVENT ALARMS. CHIT J+1506.
T/S NO JOY. UNEXPLAINED ANOMALY. FLY AS IS.
TARGET SUPPRESS BIT WAS SET SEVERAL TIMES WITHOUT,
BRIGHT OBJECT SENSOR RESPONDING. CREW DID NOT ,
O PE N S HU TT ER S AND ST OPERATION CONTINUED. ST ,
tZ SHUTTER LATCHED UP LAST FLIGHT. SEE STS+51A+ ,
21. FOUND CONTAMINATION ON LIGHT SHADES. ,,
J . H OO PER
C AR 1 9F 01 3
J . H OO PE R
S . M UR RA Y
CLOSURE IN .
PROCESS
S . H UR RA YCLOSURE IN
PROCESS
R . E GU SQ UI ZA
CLOSED
02/20/85
T. DA VI ES
CLOSURE
I N P RO CE SS
I . S AU LI ET IS
CLOSURE
I N P RO CE SS
8/7/2019 STS-51C Natonal Space Transportation Systems Promgram Mission Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sts-51c-natonal-space-transportation-systems-promgram-mission-report 10/11
)
TABLE 11.- JSC OV-I03 STS 51-C PROBLEM TRACKING LIST
+ . ++ + t+ + t· + ++ ~. + ++ + ++ + ++ t +. + ++ + t+ + +· t ++ + . .~ . · +. .+t+~++++++~+~++t+ .. +t+t.++t ... ++tt·..t+.... ~.++t .. • .. ++.. . +++tt+t+••++++JSC OV+ 103 STS 5HC PROBLE~1 TRACKING L IST FEB 25. 1985
~+ ++t ~ .. .+ ++ 4. ~+ ++ ++ .t +. + .. .++++•• ·+++••••+++tt+~++t~~tt+++~+++++++t+·++·-+++++&.+,,+++++++++.·,'.f++t++t++++
, NO. , TITLE , TIME. G .M.T. , COMMENTS , RESP. MGR.~'t+-"+t+"++ .. +++.....+++tt ........ ++++.+.+1"t .. +-t++++++++++++++t+++++++tt+++++.+++t.,..+++++++ttt++tt+++ ...+t++ ..... ++t++++++tt++++f·
9 TACAN 3 DID NOT LOCK UP. ENTRY USED TACANS 1 A ND 2. KSC FOUND LOW RECEIVER , E.LATTIER
SENSITIVITY. R&R. " CAR 20F002, C LO SU RE
, IN PROCESS,GOUGE WAS ABOUT 5 FEET LONG, 3/8 INCH WIDE AND ,
1/4 INCH DEEP AND LOCATED OUTBOARD OF LEFT MAIN ,
LANDING GEAR DOOR. CAUSE UNKNOWN. TILE REPAIRED.,,JSC DATA ANALYSIS. INTERMITTENT GROUND LOCK FROM,
2300 TO 1400 FEET. T I s FOUND ~~RGINAL LOOP ,
SENSITIVITY ON FAR RANGE. R&R WITH RA 1. PLACEDSPARE IN RA 1.
10 THERMAL PROTECTION SYSTEM HAD A
LONG GOUGE UNDER THE LEFT WING.
11 R A DA R A L TI M ET E R 2 ERRATIC AT HIGH
ALTITUDE.
12 RIGHT OMS FUEL AND OXIDIZER
QUANTITY GAGES WENT TO ZERO DURING
ENTRY.
13 F OR WA RD R CS DI LEM MA D UR IN G D EO RBI T.
14 A C PH OTO FL OOD LIG HT F AI LE D.
15 FO RWA RD DA P P ANE L (C 3) R OT ATI ON
PULSE PITCH PBI LIGHT FAILED.
P R EP A RE n B Y :/ s /R J W
ROBERT J. WARn
LAUNCH
ENTRY
ENTRY FOUND FUSES BLOWN AND AN INTERNAL SHORT ON BOTH
BUSSES. TRACED TO TOTALIZER INPUT POWER
C IRC UIT RY. R &R TO TAL IZE R.
DEORBIT PREFLIGHT WAIVER DUE TO SLOW ACTIVATION OF AC
MOTOR VALVE MANIFOLD 4 OX PRELAUNCH. T I s
SNIFFED OX FUMES. R&R MANIFOLD 4 OX VALVE.
ON O RB IT FUSE BLOWN IN OLD FLOODLIGHT. SEE PROBLEMSTS+410+19. WILL USE NEW TWO+TUBE COLOR BALANCED,
FLORESCENT FLOODLIGHT ON STS 51+E AND SUBS. ,,,,,,,
ON O RB IT CREW REPORTED LIGHT FAILED BUT DAP MODE WORKED
PROPERLY. POSTFLIGHT TIS FOUND ACA 1 LlGlIT
CONTROL CIRCUIT INTERMITTENT. R&R WITH ACA FROM
OV+I02. SEE PROBLEM STS+41D429.
02/25/85
DATE
A P PR O VE D B Y :/ s /J E M
J OS EP H E . t lE CH EL AY
J. SMITH
CLOSURE
I N ~R OC ES S
D . R HO AD ES
C AR 2 0F 00 5
CLOSED02/20/85
J . H OO PER
C AR 2 0F 00 6
CLOSED
02/20/85
G . GR ,US H
CAR AC 9013
CLOSURE
I N P RO CE SS
D . Y EA TE SCLOSURE
I N P RO CE SS
R . B UR GD UF F
C AR 1 4F0 24
CLOSURE
I N P RO CE SS
02/25/85
DATE
8/7/2019 STS-51C Natonal Space Transportation Systems Promgram Mission Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sts-51c-natonal-space-transportation-systems-promgram-mission-report 11/11
TABLE 111.- MSFC ANOMALY AND FAILURE LIST
DATE: 02-27-85 PAG E 1 O f 1
N O . T I T L E6 M T
D: H: M C O M M E N T S
I'RWE[;T
C O . T A C T
co
1 f l > F T P D i s c h a r g e T 4 ! I I I P 4 ! ra t u r eFailure
2 Controller M F Y ServoactUitorSelf T e s t Failure
24:19:52
24: 19:54
M E - 2 ( 2 01 8 ) H P F T P d i s c h a r g e t e l p e r a - S SM [ture ( C h a n n e l B) d r i f t e d below ttle R. Bledsoe/EE21l o w e r l i . i t a t a p p r o x 1 . . tely 1 3 7seconds after 1f ftoff and becillee r r a t i c for the r e s t of the flight.
' F a i l u r e analysfs r e v e a ~ e d a c r a c k ofthe coax tube. S e n s o r has been re-p l a c e d . A d e s i g n p r o c e s s · change w i lbe tncorporated on a later flight fo.this sensor. Controller s o f t w a r ed i s q u a l i f i e s a fatled s e n s o r .C L O S E D for S T S - S 1 E
M E - Z controller ( F 9 ) fafled M F V S S M (servoactuator self test { C h a n n e l 8 1 R. 8ledsoe/EE2}I t a p } r o x t. a te 1 y 3 3 1 seconds a f t e rl f f t o f f . Controller h a s been r e -t u r n e d to Honeywell f o r testfng.The probltll WIS isolated to In fn-temfttent h a n g up of a DG 140 solidstate swttch. N o other flilures ofthfs nature have been o b s e r v e d i n t~.,fstory of the S S t I : progr... T M sprobletn fs considered a randOM
piece p a r t faflure. C L O S E D
)
IlASA-JSC