STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION
-
Upload
angela-gillespie -
Category
Documents
-
view
14 -
download
0
description
Transcript of STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION
![Page 1: STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072015/56812ff1550346895d95691a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
EU-Regional Policyand Cohesion 1
Structural Funds and Accession
SPP BUILDING IMPLEMENTATION CAPACITY
Training seminar on evaluation Prague 26-27 February 2004
A VIEW FROM THE COMMISSION ON EVALUATION
IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Pascal Boijmans
European CommissionDG Regional Policy
![Page 2: STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072015/56812ff1550346895d95691a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
EU-Regional Policyand Cohesion 2
Structural Funds and Accession
STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION
• Experience with ex-ante evaluation in the Czech Republic
- strong points- points that need further attention
• Building up evaluation capacity in the Czech Republic
- evaluation plan- organisation- financing
• Evaluation vs. Monitoring
• Conclusions and recommendations
• Sources of information
![Page 3: STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072015/56812ff1550346895d95691a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
EU-Regional Policyand Cohesion 3
Structural Funds and Accession
EXPERIENCE EX-ANTE EVALUATION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• NDP: Berman Group, Charles University, Faculty of Science
• OP Industry & Enterprise: VSE, March Consulting, IFO Institute
• OP HRD: National Observatory for Employment and Training
• OP RDMFA: Institute for Economic and Environmental Policy, University of Economics (VSE)
• OP Environment: Cityplan
• OP Transport: DHV CR
• OP Tourism: Europroject, Redeco
• JROP: VSE
• Prague Obj. 2: DHV CR
• Prague: Obj. 3: National Observatory for Employment and Training
![Page 4: STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072015/56812ff1550346895d95691a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
EU-Regional Policyand Cohesion 4
Structural Funds and Accession
EXPERIENCE EX-ANTE EVALUATION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• genuine efforts to follow EU guidelines: working paper no 2 on ex ante evaluation
- lessons from the past- socio-economic analysis- choice of strategy and priorities: internal and
external coherence- quantification of objectives- expected socio-economic impact and allocation of
resources- implementation arrangements
• separate Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEAs) for each programme
• involvement universities and research institutes
![Page 5: STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072015/56812ff1550346895d95691a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
EU-Regional Policyand Cohesion 5
Structural Funds and Accession
EXPERIENCE EX-ANTE EVALUATION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• standard Terms of Reference
• restricted tender or direct agreement
• guarantee of independence evaluator
- internal or external evaluator?
• financing
- ex ante evaluations 2004-06: national budget
• interactive process with programming exercise
![Page 6: STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072015/56812ff1550346895d95691a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
EU-Regional Policyand Cohesion 6
Structural Funds and Accession
EXPERIENCE EX-ANTE EVALUATION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• Case study: ex-ante evaluation NDP by Berman Group
- consortium of Czech and foreign experts
- involvement Dept. of Social Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Science, Charles University
- interactive exercise with programming: large influence on final NDP
- concise report with clear recommendations
- input for negotiation mandate EC
![Page 7: STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072015/56812ff1550346895d95691a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
EU-Regional Policyand Cohesion 7
Structural Funds and Accession
BUILDING UP OF EVALUATION CAPACITY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• COMMITMENT IN CHAPTER 21 FOR THE CZECH REPUBLIC:
• Binding rules will be set up for the evaluation of programmes and projects
• a permanent evaluation body will be created within each Managing Authority ate the level of OPs
• MRD will be responsible for the overall coordination of separate evaluation units
![Page 8: STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072015/56812ff1550346895d95691a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
EU-Regional Policyand Cohesion 8
Structural Funds and Accession
BUILDING UP OF EVALUATION CAPACITY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• TEXT IN COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK STATES:
• A part of the budget under heading TA will be reserved to develop the evaluation capacity for 2004-2006 programmes and for future 2007-2013 programmes.
• Examples of areas to be covered are macro-economic assessment, reliability of indicator system and horizontal priorities
• A specific evaluation unit in Ministry for Regional Development is in charge of coordination
![Page 9: STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072015/56812ff1550346895d95691a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
EU-Regional Policyand Cohesion 9
Structural Funds and Accession
BUILDING UP OF EVALUATION CAPACITY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• DEVELOPMENT OF AN EVALUATION PLAN
• Evaluation is a learning instrument
• Differentiation in approach between CSF and OPs
• CSF:- horizontal issues and priorities- Lisbon strategy- macro-economic assessment (HERMIN model)- reliability monitoring and indicator system- preparation for period 2007-2013
• OPs:- ex-ante next period 2007-2013- sectoral issues
• Coordination role for MRD: exchange of information
• Focus on limited number of evaluations
![Page 10: STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072015/56812ff1550346895d95691a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
EU-Regional Policyand Cohesion 10
Structural Funds and Accession
BUILDING UP OF EVALUATION CAPACITY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• ORGANISATIONAL ASPECTS
• Specific evaluation unit in MRD
• Interministerial working group
• Strengthen evaluation capacity within national authorities
• Development of tools how to use and spread added value of evaluations
• Discussion of outcome evaluations in Monitoring Committees: trigger for in depth discussions
![Page 11: STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072015/56812ff1550346895d95691a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
EU-Regional Policyand Cohesion 11
Structural Funds and Accession
BUILDING UP OF EVALUATION CAPACITY IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• FINANCING
• Technical Assistance: rule no. 11 of Reg. 1145/2003 (not capped)
• separate heading in TA-plan
• Eligible expenditure:
- external expertise
- additional staffing (capped)
- training
- workshops, seminars, study visits
![Page 12: STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072015/56812ff1550346895d95691a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
EU-Regional Policyand Cohesion 12
Structural Funds and Accession
EVALUATION VS. MONITORING• different activities, but clearly depending on each-other
• importance of well functioning and reliable monitoring system is a precondition for good evaluation
- MSSF: Central, Benefit, Monit- VIOLA- and other systems
• training of staff on input of data
• limited number of high quality and representative indicators
- baseline- target- source of information
• Guidelines EC on indicators for new Member States
![Page 13: STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072015/56812ff1550346895d95691a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
EU-Regional Policyand Cohesion 13
Structural Funds and Accession
CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONSPart I
• Development of standard Terms of Reference for all evaluations
• EC: preference for restricted tenders
• Ex-ante evaluation: parallel and interactive process with programming exercise
• Continue involvement of universities and research institutes
• Evaluation reports: concise and clear recommendations
![Page 14: STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072015/56812ff1550346895d95691a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
EU-Regional Policyand Cohesion 14
Structural Funds and Accession
CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONSPart II
• Evaluation plan: focus on limited number of evaluations
• Differentiation in evaluation approach between CSF and OPs
• Develop tools how to use best the added value and results of evaluations
• Develop evaluation expertise within national authorities
• Assure reliability of monitoring systems as basis for evaluation tasks
![Page 15: STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072015/56812ff1550346895d95691a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
EU-Regional Policyand Cohesion 15
Structural Funds and Accession
INFORMATION SOURCES
• Evaluation Section of Inforegio website:
• http://europa.eu.int/comm/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/evaluation_en.htm
• Commission working documents
• Evaluations undertaken for the Commission
• The new Evaluation GUIDE (forthcoming)