Stroke EVT- A Discussion

70
Stroke EVT Panel discussion

Transcript of Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Page 1: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Stroke EVTPanel discussion

Page 2: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

26 female wake up stroke; NIHSS 22; R sided weakness and aphasia

Page 3: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Solitaire (ev3)- 2012, Trevo (Stryker), Revive™ SE (Codman), Etc…. etc…..

Stentretrievers - Stent or stent-like system for clot removal

Page 4: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

ARTS (SOLUMBRA)(Aspiration-Retriever Technique for Stroke)

Page 5: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Techniques..

ADAPT…A Direct Aspiration First Pass technique

Page 6: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Techniques

A. Stent retriever B. Stent retriever with BCG C. Stent retriever with DAC (ARTS), SOLUMBRAD. ADAPT E. Other

Page 7: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Issues

• Trials• Simplicity• Change of techniques• Cost issues • One standard technique

Page 8: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

P to P – 58 minutesPuncture to reperfusion – 18 minutes

Page 9: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

F/U MRI; Some residual mild aphasia

Page 10: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Technique

• Simple – similar result in different hands and at all times

• Fast – stick to one technique • Each step as a protocol –

everybody in team in sync• Avoid experimentation in initial

phase • Other factors (selection, time

…) more important

Page 11: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Device – technique

Comparison of protocol- Randomised (Intervention Vs Standard medical therapy)

Page 12: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

TREVO, Stryker Neurovascular

REVIVE, Codman Neurovascular

ERIC, Microvention

Technique ……

Page 13: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Choice of Stent retriever and why ?

A. Solitaire B. TrevoC. Revive D. ERICE. Other

Page 14: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

14Presentation Title (Edit on Slide Master) | June 1, 2015 | Confidential, for Internal

Use Only

SOLITAIRE 2 - IMPROVED TENSILE STRENGTH

Solitaire™ 2 Device

Solitaire™ FR Device

The Solitaire™ 2 Revascularization Device also employs a redesigned attachment zone offering a 2x improvement in joint strength designed to eliminate unintended detachments

Peak Load0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Solitaire™ FR DeviceSolitaire™ 2 Device

(N)

Page 15: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

15Presentation Title (Edit on Slide Master) | June 1, 2015 | Confidential, for Internal

Use Only

SOLITAIRE 2 Device overviewReference Number

Recommended Vessel

Diameter (mm)

(A) Total Length (mm)

(B) Retrieval Zone (mm)

(C) Device Diameter

(mm)

(D) Push Wire Length (cm)

(E) Distal Markers

(F) Proximal Markers

Distance from Distal Tip to Flourosafe

Marker (cm)

Micro Catheter ID

(in)

SFR2-4-15 2.0 - 4.0 26 15 4 180 3 1 <130 .021

SFR2-4-20 2.0 - 4.0 31 20 4 180 3 1 <130 .021

SFR2-4-40 2.0 - 4.0 50 40 4 180 3 1 <130 .021

SFR2-6-20 3.0 - 5.5 31 20 6 180 4 1 <130 .027

SFR2-6-30 3.0 - 5.5 42 30 6 180 4 1 <130 .027

Page 16: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Trevo and Trevo XP

High Integration

Radial Force

Large Cell Size with

Low Coverage

Tubular Design

INTEGRATE & PULLPhotograph taken by Stryker Neurovascular.

Page 17: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Solitaire™ FR Device vs. Trevo™* DeviceDesign Overview

**Competitive Testing Report FD2815.***Covidien Testing Data: FD2601A

Trevo™* Device

Solitaire™ DeviceImages property of Covidien. Image is an artistic rendering

and not a n exact depiction of the Solitaire™ FR Device.Image property of Covidien. Image is an artistic

rendering and not a n exact depiction of the Trevo™ Device.

• The Solitaire™ FR device - Parametric™ design that may provide multiple planes of clot contact. •Trevo - straight cut tube ; struts of the Trevo™* device to cut into the clot

Consistent Cell Size

Variable Cell Size

Force-Flex™

Straight-Cut

Page 18: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

64 year old man with left hemiparesis, bought to emergency in 60 min, NIHSS 16

No improvement after IV tpa

54, M, 2 hours, NIHSS - 17

Page 19: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Tandem – Proximal ICA occlusion (AS) with MCA clot

A. Distal followed by proximal PTA/StentB. Proximal PTA followed by distal C. Proximal stent followed by distal D. Proximal suction followed by distalE. Distal with no proximal intervention

Page 20: Stroke EVT- A Discussion
Page 21: Stroke EVT- A Discussion
Page 22: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Follow up

Patient ImprovedmRs 2 at discharge

CTA 15 days later show occluded stent Right MCA opacifies through Acom

Page 23: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Anterograde vs retrograde approach:

Antegrade : Stenting first

Pros: Access to distal lesionPerfusion through collateral (in case of tandem MCA occlusion)Reduced risk of repeat embolism (??)

Cons: Delay in reperfusion of occluded territory

Retrograde: Thrombectomy first

Pros: Early reperfusion of occluded territoryCons: Access to distal lesion is limited

Risk of repeat embolism (??)

Page 24: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Our approach Acute stroke with ICA occlusion• Usually distal first , take the guiding catheter across

the stenosis• Terumo/microcatheter to cross• DAC/Neuron 6F - aspiration• Co-axial approach • Recanalize the I/C part• Check the proximal ICA (wire in situ)• If good flow , not a severe stenosis - wait• Usually needs Angioplasty/stenting• Drugs – If IV tPA given – Ecospirin 150 mg, Clopidogrel

225 mg ; other wise 300, 450 mg

Page 25: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

• 28 patients• Antegrade approach (85.7%); Reverse approach (14.3%)• Antiplatelet: Load Aspirin (650 mg) when stenting anticipated. • Cone-beam CT after tt - No hmg, 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel.

SICH in 2 (one received IV tPA)

Page 26: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

• Retrospective; September 2010 and April 2013• Compared proximal vs distal approach • Weight-adapted bolus of tirofiban followed by a continuous infusion

for 24 h to prevent in-stent thrombosis• After exclusion of cerebral hemorrhage on follow-up imaging, 500

mg of acetylsalicylacid (ASA) and 300 mg of clopidogrel

Page 27: Stroke EVT- A Discussion
Page 28: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Issues with Stenting in the acute setting: Factors to be considered.

• Infarct core volume

• Time to reperfusion

• Received IV tPA or not

• Antiplatelet to be tailored to above

• Need for Abciximab in case of in-stent thrombosis (increases bleeding risk)

• Risk of stent occlusion

• Antiplatelet protocol: Thrombolysis (Yes) – Ecosprin (300); CT Brain in 12 to 24 hours no hemorrhage add Clopidogrel.

• Thrombolysis (no) – Ecosprin 300 and Clopidogrel 600 loading

Page 29: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Emergency carotid stent – drug protocol

A. Loading with abciximab or equivalentB. Loading with aspirin and clopidogrelC. CT followed by loadingD. Single anti-platelet followed by second after a whileE. Other

Page 30: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

• 60 years old female.• h/o hypertension and hypothyroidism• Acute onset left hemiparesis and left facial weakness• No history of LOC/seizures• CT Brain , perfusion and angio done 6 1/2 hours after ictus.

Page 31: Stroke EVT- A Discussion
Page 32: Stroke EVT- A Discussion
Page 33: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

2 months later

Page 34: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

A

D

A

C

B

A

E F

HG

A sixty five year old presented at five hours of symptom onset with a NIHSS of 22

Page 35: Stroke EVT- A Discussion
Page 36: Stroke EVT- A Discussion
Page 37: Stroke EVT- A Discussion
Page 38: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Stenting

Still occluded

Page 39: Stroke EVT- A Discussion
Page 40: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Patient presented with in 2 hours

Futile IV tpa

62/F, 3-hours, NIHSS 18

Page 41: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Imaging

A. CT, CTAB. CT, CTA, collateral scoringC. CT, CTA, CTPD. MR – DWI, MRAE. MR – DWI, MRP, MRAF. CT, CTA, MR- DWI

Page 42: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Patient presented with in 2 hours

Futile IV tpa

Page 43: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

26 female wake up stroke; NIHSS 22; R sided weakness and aphasia

Page 44: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Good collaterals by the Miteff method (OR, 3.341; 95% CI, 1.203–5.099; P .014) was the independent predictor of good outcome amongst various collateral grading scales.

Arterial Collateral status – penumbra, retention of penumbra

Page 45: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Miteff system

A, Contrast opacification all sylvian branches. B, Some vessels can be seen at the Sylvian fissure. C, distal cortical filling alone

Page 46: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Modified Tan system. A, Less than 50% of the MCA territory. B, More than 50% of the MCA territory

Page 47: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Multiphase CTA

Better able to predict outcomes than single phase and perfusion CT

Page 48: Stroke EVT- A Discussion
Page 49: Stroke EVT- A Discussion
Page 50: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

CT, CTA, CTP….CT perfusion imaging

MTTCBF CBVQuantitative CTP mismatch classification using relCBF and Tmax is similar to perfusion-diffusion MRI. Stroke. 2012 Oct;43(10):2648-53. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

Incremental improvement in interobserver reliability was demonstrated for

NCCT, CTA-SI, and CTP-CBV, respectively. (Stroke. 2013;44(1):234-6) 25.

Page 51: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

CT perfusion•

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Jan 25. CT perfusion improves diagnostic accuracy and confidence in acute ischaemic stroke.

CTP was more frequently diagnostic than NCCT (80% vs 50%, p<0.001). Normal CTP in 86/87 patients with stroke mimics supported withholding tPA

Consideration of multiple available CT sequences increases confidence for correct stroke diagnosis among inexperienced readers and may facilitate identification of stroke mimics

Stroke. 2013 Feb 12. [Epub ahead of print]Computed Tomography Workup of Patients Suspected of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Perfusion Computed Tomography Adds Value Compared With Clinical Evaluation, Noncontrast Computed Tomography, and Computed Tomography Angiogram in Terms of Predicting Outcome.Zhu G, Michel P, Aghaebrahim A, Patrie JT, Xin W, Eskandari A, Zhang W, Wintermark M.

J Neurointerv Surg. 2012 Nov 26. [Epub ahead of print]CT perfusion-guided patient selection for endovascular recanalization in acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter study

Page 52: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Beating the Bullet!!!!

Page 53: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

•The Interventional Management of Stroke pilot trials tested combined IV/IA therapy onset.

•Among the 54 cases, only time to angiographic reperfusion and age independently predicted good clinical outcome after angiographic reperfusion.

Page 54: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

30-min delay in angiographic reperfusion reduced the relative likelihood of a good clinical outcome by 12% i adjusted analysis.

Page 55: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

What did ESCAPE trial aim for?P2P- picture to puncture

P2R – picture to recanalization

A. P2P - 90 min, P2R - 120 minB. P2P - 60 min, P2R – 120 minC. P2P - 60 min, P2R – 90 minD. P2P – 45 min, P2R – 60 minE. P2P – 30 min, P2R – 60 min

Page 56: Stroke EVT- A Discussion
Page 57: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

TIME for recanalization• Onset to door time

• Door to Imaging/picture

• Picture to puncture (P2P)

• Puncture to recanalization time

Hospital processes

Technical skills

• Onset to puncture/groin time

• Onset to recanalization time

• Door to Puncture (D2P)

• Picture to recanalization (P2R)

Society infrastructure

Ultimate predictor

Page 58: Stroke EVT- A Discussion
Page 59: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

One hundred forty-six patients (93 pre- vs. 51 post-QI) were analyzed.

Page 60: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

The worst clinical outcomes were noted with door-to-puncture times of 136 minutes or greater

( J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3:e000859

N=478

Page 61: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

P2P Challenges

• CT vs MRI

• Availability of the angiosuite SOS

• 24x 7 neurointerventionist, anaesthetist, technician, nurse

• Team of like minded people

• Overcoming the Financial Barrier

Page 62: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Rapid Triage Protocol and Stroke Team Notification

Single Call Activation System

Changes at Medanta

Page 63: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Door time recording by CCTV footage

Transfer Directly to CT

Rapid Acquisition and Interpretation of Brain Imaging

Multimodal imaging protocol (CTA/CTP)

Parallel approachClinical assessment ‘en route’ to Imaging.Access line and blood investigations (POC)Prepare IV tPAAlert Angio suite/ Lab personnel Financial considerations/ undertakingConsent – pre written

Changes at Medanta

Page 64: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Puncture to Recanlization time

• Planning on CT angiography

• Local anaesthesia

• No groin preparation

• Putting Foley’s after deploying stent

• Standardized stroke kit that is ready to go

(Stroke. 2014;45:e252-e256.)

Page 65: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Tips to getting the clot on first pass

• Use of balloon guide catheter

• Long stent 4mm X 40 mm solitaire

• Push & Fluff technique

• Prayer!!!

Page 66: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

• 41 year old male, Severe MR, EF 20%• Stroke in sleep, NIHSS 14 on admission

Page 67: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

6:22AM

Page 68: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Patient made gradual recoveryLeft LL 4/5 and UL 3/5 - 30 day follow upmRS at 90 days- 0

Page 69: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

For more information on:STROKE & NEUROVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS:

URL:www.sanif.co.in

Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/strokeawarenessindiahttps://www.facebook.com/vipul.gupta.35175

Twitterhttps://twitter.com/drvipulgupta25

LinkedINhttps://in.linkedin.com/pub/dr-vipul-gupta/51/8a1/25a

YouTubeChannel: Stroke & Neurovascular Interventionswww.youtube.com/c/StrokeNeurovascularInterventionsfoundation

Dr Vipul Gupta

Page 70: Stroke EVT- A Discussion

Thank You