Steve Hebsch - Architectural Portfolio 2015
-
Upload
steve-hebsch -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Steve Hebsch - Architectural Portfolio 2015
S e g m e n t 1 P o r t f o l i o
S T E V E H E B S C HBACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE
S e g m e n t 1 P o r t f o l i o
About MeMy experiences at the BAC, coupled with my professional practice, has fostered my growth in many ways over the past few years. I feel as though each studio, as well as each project, has created progress in my journey. The concurrent format of the BAC encourages growth by creat-ing challenges not typically seen in traditional architecture programs. My education and prac-tice is a constant reminder of the importance of the interative process, and its ability to stimulate
In my current position, I have been involved in every step of the design process on several large jobs, from Conceptual, Space Planning Stages, all the way into 100% Construction Documents and Construction Administration. This has provided me with a variety of experiences, allowing
-ing alongside principals, project managers, and project architects, I have been to multiple client
with numerous vendors and general contractors. I hope to continue to have a long association -
that the BAC truly capitalizes on.
NHAIA Project, 2009
GBCC Addition, 2014
Construction is an extremely expensive, energy intensive process that requires
-
that are worth building.
Charcoal, 2012
PORTFOLIO CONTENTSAcademic
Professional
PAINTING EXPLORATION
A1 STUDIODREAMSPACE
URBAN RETREAT
THE RITUAL
A2 STUDIO
THE PASSAGECHAIR PROJECT
NORTH END & LOVEJOY WHARF
B1 STUDIO
MUSEUM STUDIES
B2 STUDIO
PAVILION AT ARNOLD ARBORITUMAPPARATUS AND TECTONIC STUDIES
JSA ARCHITECTS
GREAT BAY COMMUNITY COLLEGEMcCONNELL HALL, UNH
STENBAK DESIGN ASSOCIATESFORD AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIP
BARCELONA PAVILION
VILLENEUVE HOME
SKETCH PROBLEM 1 & 2CHARCOAL
DESIGN PRINCIPLES
14-198-13
20-25
36-3932-3528-31
50-5546-49
64-6958-63
98-10592-97
86-91
42-45
76-7980-83
70-75
106-109
PAINTING EXPLORATION
A1 STUDIODREAMSPACE
URBAN RETREAT14-198-13
20-25
8
DREAM SPACE
-
was to create a space that combined a standalone residence, that could be within a city environment. In addition, I intended for the space to be extremely sustainable, allowing
than what it would have been in a home of typical construction.
FALL 2011 A1 STUDIO
The Core Tower would serve as vertical movement throghout the building, as well as a mechanical chase. The Core is also designed as a space for the occupants to meet.
9
Connection to the outside of the build-ing was very important. By creating visual access to the outside, occupants could enjoy seeing activity outside. In addition to occupant satisfaction, there
solar gain.
This was achieved by creating basically a double envelope, where the air space served as the insu-lation for the design, as well as creating an interior, outside space in between the exterior envelope, and interior envelope.
INSTRUCTOR: WESLEY SCHWARTZ
10
The height of the core could al-low the space to be elevated, so that the occupants could enjoy the space under the residence, the roof garden on top, and the space within the residence, itself.
11INSTRUCTOR: WESLEY SCHWARTZ
The Core Tower would serve as vertical movement throghout the building, as well as a mechanical chase. The Core is also designed as a space for the occupants to meet.
12
This was achieved by creat-ing basically a double en-velope, where the air space served as the insulation for the design, as well as creat-ing an interior, outside space in between the exterior envelope, and interior enve-lope.
13
The conclusion of this project was extremely informative, because I was able to gain a stronger understanding of how to create design concepts, as well as how to create dia-
INSTRUCTOR: WESLEY SCHWARTZ
14
PAINTING EXPLORATION
The objective of this project was to analyze an abstract painting, and estab-lish rules that allow for the painting to be explored in three dimensions. This piece is by Liubov Popova, a Russian avant-garde artist, and designer. Her
the Russian development of Cubo-Futur-ism. The geometric nature of this paint-ing heavily encoouraged me to explore what other forms these planes could be. Could they perhaps be a face of solid, rather than planes, as suggested by the painting?
FALL 2011 A1 STUDIO
-stand the solid nature of these planes was through direction. By establishing the sense of direc-tion, I could establish the possible orientation of the solids, to fur-ther determine the volume of the shapes that I was intepreting.
15INSTRUCTOR: WESLEY SCHWARTZ
The second Rule that helped futher establish my understanding of the solids vs. planes was
triangle that would served as the base, seen in the diagram above and below as #9.
16
17INSTRUCTOR: WESLEY SCHWARTZ
-ming, I was able to justify the Layering and Movement rules that allow me to iter-perate the volumes that can be seen as planes in the painting. Each diagram ref-erences a surface in which
in order to create the illu-sion of the planes within the painting.
18
could have faces that are orientated in such a way, that with the proper lighting and vantage point, recreate Popovo’s painting.
19
Further investigation with the use of a shadow box, had proven that the geometric forms that were interpreted in Popova’s painting, could in fact have been of a, geomet-ric object, rather than planar surfaces. This project provid-
Before this, forms and vol-
Now I understand the gravity that they carry.
INSTRUCTOR: WESLEY SCHWARTZ
URBAN CULTURAL CENTER
The Urban Cultural Center is
directly across from the BAC. The design intent was to create a space in which my client, a physicist, could feel partially re-moved from the city for study, as well as have the ability to in-vite colleagues to contemplate
FALL 2011 A1 STUDIO
surrounding residents. Ac-cess to the site from Newbury street is currently met with a concrete stair. The site is also accessible with virtually no change in terrain from the
of the day, the site recieves a large amount of shade, help-
street is currently met with a concrete stair. The site is also accessible with virtually no change in terrain from the
of the day, the site recieves a large amount of shade, help-
20
VIEW LOOKING SOUTH FROM ALLEYWAY
VIEW LOOKING NORTH FROM NEWBURY ST.
21INSTRUCTOR: WESLEY SCHWARTZ
Newbury St to the Public Alley, bordering the North end of the lot. The pavilion for the phys-
create spaces along the sites gradual slope for private conversation, and opportunities for random iteraction among attendees.
22
As I began to further study the program, it became apparent that rather than have the spaces completely separated, I needed to have a physical association between the two. You can see this physical association on the green space, in the models and drawings.
23INSTRUCTOR: WESLEY SCHWARTZ 23INSTRUCTOR: WESLEY SCHWARTZ
Not only did the separation or association of the spaces begin to impact the buildings design, but the roof also became a point of contention. Whether or not to show a larger roof spanning the two, separated spaces, or if they were
24
The site to the right was successful in creating separate spaces. However, it disconnected the Presentation Space, which is meant to be publicly accessible, from Newbury St. I felt as though this disconnect would be disadvantage. The site below is far more successful at welcoming in visitors, while maintaining privacy for the Private Study.
25INSTRUCTOR: WESLEY SCHWARTZ 25INSTRUCTOR: WESLEY SCHWARTZ
The project ultimately was succesful in demonstrating how a private, study space, could be located in close proximity, but still achieve privacy. In addition small meet-ing spaces were located along the passageway from the lower, North end of the site, to the Newbury st level.
THE RITUAL
A2 STUDIO
THE PASSAGECHAIR PROJECT
36-3932-3528-31
28
CHAIR PROJECT
Our study began with a series of explorations involving various chairs. The purpose of this initial investigation was to gain an understanding of how previous designers have created successful chairs that not only complimented ergonomics, but were aethestically successful.
SPRING 2012 A2 STUDIO
Ergonomics became central to our study, as we went through numerous iterations of measurements to completely understand how a chair could compliment the human form.
29INSTRUCTOR: KERRI FRICK
Our intial investigation required the construction of various con-cepts, with various iterations,
-ings. We focused on how a chair could accomodate the human form for comfort, with an emphasis on the activity of lounging.
To gain a comphrehensive understanding of how chairs can successfully compliment comfort, we studied chairs that we designed by famous designers, such as the Eames, 5 point Chair.
30
Once we created a smaller version of our chair, our next step in the process was to create a larger version, which would al-low us to explore how scalable our joint design could be. This larger iteration would be a chaise lounge chair.
Ergonomics remained central to our study, as our design goals involved creating a comfortable, durable lounge chair. Assembly was also important, so that joints could be simply repaired.
31INSTRUCTOR: KERRI FRICK
which was constructed of hundreds of joints would prove to be strong, yet light and portable.
32
THE PASSAGE
Our study began with a series of explorations involving various types of theoretical cities. These various cities had numerous, and unique conditions. Utlimately, the goals of these exercises were to create typolgies, within a site, that created a clear relationship of structure and space.
SPRING 2012 A2 STUDIO
The two cities in which I studied were the Trading City of Esmeralda and The Thin City of Isaura. Through these two studies, we were to create a hybrid city, which would embody features of each city. From these features, we would begin to apply these to a human scale.
33INSTRUCTOR: KERRI FRICK
By creating a collage, we began to understand how each cities features could start to interact with the site, and how they may apply to human scale.
Through the analysis of spatial models, we were able to develop an approach to
Layering, and Expansion/Compression were the two tectonics that were the most
34
The passage would allow for a series of private and public spaces for visitors to engage with. There are also numerous spaces in which visitors can interact one another. The site is also designed to allow for random opportunities of interaction among visitors.
35INSTRUCTOR: KERRI FRICK
multiple vantage points. This is engaged through a series of transitions involving layering and thresholds of public and private spaces.
36
THE RITUAL
For this series of exercises, we were to choose a ritual in which to derive our tectonics from. I chose the ritual of stone cutting. With a history of being a mason in my family, myself includ-
-tural tectonics. My two tectonics became splitting and drilling.
SPRING 2012 A2 STUDIO
LORD & TAYLOR
BOYLSTON ST.
PRUDENTIAL MALL
37INSTRUCTOR: KERRI FRICK
There were numerous iterations per-formed in order to more thoroughly understand the roles in which each tectonic would engage the project, and how components such as shel-ter and seating would respond.
38
39INSTRUCTOR: KERRI FRICK
-thesis of the drilling and splitting tectonics. The metal plates that were used not only oscillate to represent the splitting, but also bend in numerous, gradual positions
NORTH END & LOVEJOY WHARF
B1 STUDIO
MUSEUM STUDIESBARCELONA PAVILION
50-5546-4942-45
42
BARCELONA PAVILION
The objective of these ex-ercises were to gain a more comprehensive understand-ing of building analysis. This was to prepare us for
would involve diagramming
well as create comprehen-sive orthogonal drawings to represent what we are observing.
FALL 2012 B1 STUDIO
SITE PLAN
43INSTRUCTORS: TODD SHAFER & MICHAEL CIMORELLI
FLOOR PLAN
SECTION A-A
FRONT ELEVATION
44
ENCLOSED VOLUME STUDY
VIEW FROM THE EAST, LOOKING WEST
45INSTRUCTORS: TODD SHAFER & MICHAEL CIMORELLI
WATER FEATURES IN RELATION TO SOCIAL SPACES
VIEW FROM THE SOUTHEAST, LOOKING NORTHWEST
46
MUSEUM STUDIES
The objective of these exercises were to gain a more comprehensive understanding of building analy-sis. From the Barcelona Pavilion, we were assigned a more local, yet larger in scale, building. I had been assigned the Isabella Gardner Museum, on 280 Fenway, Boston.
instances of construction, and reno-vation/addition.
FALL 2012 B1 STUDIO
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
47INSTRUCTORS: TODD SHAFER & MICHAEL CIMORELLI
Isabella Gardner was born in 1840. She was an American Art Col-lector, who had received a large inheritance from her father. After her husband’s death, she built the original museum. The origi-nal museum’s construction lasted from 1896 until 1903. She passed away in 1924. Today the museum hosts education programs, as well as Artists’ Residences. The New Addition by Renzo Piano was con-struced from 2009-2012, and cost $118 million.
ART GALLERY, EXTERIOR VIEW
ART GALLERY, INTERIOR VIEW
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
48
The art gallery was perhaps one of the most gracious spaces in the entire Renzo Piano Addition. The high ceilings, combined with ample natural daylight enhanced the space immensely.
GARDEN COVERED WALKWAY SECTION
THEATER SECTIONART GALLERY SECTION
LONGITUDINAL SECTION
49INSTRUCTORS: TODD SHAFER & MICHAEL CIMORELLI
The Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum is a beautiful building composed of an ex-isting structure, with a modern addition. The scale of each building compliments
a true sense of place.
GARDEN COVERED WALKWAY
THEATER
NEW MAIN ENTRANCE
THEATER
50
NORTH END & LOVEJOY WHARF
The objective of these exercises were to gain a more comprehen-sive understanding of site anal-ysis, and how it could shape the architecture. The focus was on how the site can provide oppor-tunities for views, pedestrian transportation, as well as wa-ter taxis access. Ultimately, the design ended up being a product of the site anaylsis, which in turn leads to a very connected pedes-
of the surrounding views.
FALL 2012 B1 STUDIO
The Macro Site Analyses were provided in order to determine what the urban fabric around the Lovejoy Wharf was. Initially we analyzed the greenspaces, and then began to add in the buildings to show streets and urban density. From there, we anaylsed surronding amentities, including; museums, cafes, restaurants, and MBTA Stations,
WATER
OPEN SPACE
SITE
BUILDING FOOTPRINTS
SITE ANALYSIS: AGE DEMOGRAPHIC
51INSTRUCTORS: TODD SHAFER & MICHAEL CIMORELLI
SITE ANALYSIS: SHADOW STUDY
Through these various observations, it was clear that regardless of the position of the sun, or the demographic, people were not really utilizing the site, as it was mostly a transitional site for nearly all who I witnessed coming through the area.
WATER
OPEN SPACE
SITE
BLDG FTPRNTS
5 & 10min WALK
RESTAURANTS
CAFES
MUSEUMS
MBTA STATION
52
SITE ANALYSIS: SITE DIAGRAM
SITE ANALYSIS: SITE ACCESS
SITE ANALYSIS: SPACE PROGRAM
53INSTRUCTORS: TODD SHAFER & MICHAEL CIMORELLI
SITE ANALYSIS: SITE CONCEPT
MACRO SITE ANALYSIS: SURROUNDING CONTEXT
Through these various observations, it was clear that the site analyses would ultimately shape the outcome of the building, due to the transient nature of the occupants.
54
WATER TAXI ITERATION 1
CIRCULATION ITERATION 2
HYBRID ITERATION
These last iterations were directly impacted by the program, which was based on site anaylses, which
assessed so that it would meet not only the visitors using the site as a destination, but it would also allow for a transient individual to by-pass the Water Taxi Services, and others, by either bicycle or on foot. The multi-tiered design was intended for this exact purpose. The shape of the building is meant to direct views, and provide ambundant sunlight.
HUBWAY DETAIL
ENLARGED ‘DOCK’ PLAN
55INSTRUCTORS: TODD SHAFER & MICHAEL CIMORELLI
LONGITUDINAL SECTION
TRANSVERSE SECTION PERSPECTIVE FROM CHARLESTOWN BRIDGE
PERSPECTIVE FROM ZAKIM BRIDGE
OVERALL PLAN
B2 STUDIO
PAVILION AT ARNOLD ARBORITUMAPPARATUS AND TECTONIC STUDIES
64-6958-63
58
APPARATUS AND TECTONIC STUDIES
The objective of these exercises were to gain a more comprehensive under-standing of tectonics. In addition to tectonics, we also focused on establish-ing a sense of scale. Through numer-ous iterations, we established an archi-tectural language that focused less on the constructability, and more on the spatial relationships.
SPRING 2013 B2 STUDIO
-tion joint. Out of the three details that were as-signed, this detail had an intriguing set of tectonics.
THE BLUE AND RED MEMEBERS ACT AS A WAY TO INTERLOCK THE GREEN AND ORANGE MEMBERS EITHER THROUGH SLOTTING OR PENETRATRION
THE GREEN AND ORANGE MEMBERS SEEM TO BE IN TENSION AND ARE SLOTTED TO RECEIVE THE BLUE AND RED MEMEBERS
59INSTRUCTOR: MICHAEL CREHAN
The slotting motion of the two planes, or as I interpretted, a plane and pin, could either be seen as a continous connection, or a connection that only occurs at one instance.
60
The second joint that was assigned was a cellular detail, consisting of a curved
the stem. The stem seemed to have a strong sense of directionality, while
the main stem, suggesting there was a tension within the stem, which could have caused the fraying.
STRANDS
STEM
61INSTRUCTOR: MICHAEL CREHAN
The third detail that was assigned was
vertebrae or spine, and apendages that are pertruding from either sides. The ‘spine’ seems to have a series of joints that form the spine. The petruding members from the spine seem to be in tension with some sort of material stretched between them.
DETAIL SEEMS TO SHOW A DIFFER-ENCE IN SIZE BETWEEN BLUE AND TAN MEMBERS, WHICH COULD MEAN DIFFERENT USES
AXIS: THE ‘SPINE’ VOIDS SEEM TO HAVE SOME SORT OF TENSIONED FABRIC OR SKIN WITHIN THEM
62
the project.
63INSTRUCTOR: MICHAEL CREHAN
the with construction tectonics.
FLOOR PLAN SECTION VIEW
64
PAVILION AT ARNOLD ARBORETUM
The site for The Pavilion was located within Boston’s Arnold Arboretum, near Peter’s Hill. Based on our
tectonic from the previous project and apply it to the terrain of the site. We would be performing site anaylses in order to gain a more holistic understanding of the site.
SPRING 2013 B2 STUDIO
The site for The Pavilion was located within Boston’s Arnold Arboretum, near
previous project and apply it to the terrain of the site. We would be performing site anaylses in order to gain a more holistic understanding of the site.
65INSTRUCTOR: MICHAEL CREHAN
66
Ultimately, I chose the crater site, rather than the gardual slope see the left of the section diagram on the previous page. The ‘Crater Site’ provided a more daunting challenge, due to the way in which the terrain is sloped. Ther diagram to the right shows two white arrows as paths
investigation.
LOOKING FROM THE PATHWAY INTO THE ‘CRATER’ SITE
LOOKING FROM THE CRATER SITE UP TOWARDS THE PATHWAY
TREE GROWTH STUDY
67INSTRUCTOR: MICHAEL CREHAN
Using similar principles to the construction joints
challenged to devise a typology that would traverse the terrain, and hold consistent with the tectonic. Through numerous iterations, I devised a joint that has the similar characteristics as the construction joint, but has a more ‘slotting, pin motion’, rather than a tongue and groove joint.
TECTONIC STUDIES
68
KEY
BATHROOMS
EXHIBIT ‘A’
EXHIBIT ‘B’
OFFICE
CORRIDOR
MEETING
PAVILION TECTONIC
TECTONIC STUDIES
PROGRAM STUDY
COLORED FLOOR PLAN
69INSTRUCTOR: MICHAEL CREHAN
PICTURE FROM PATHWAYOVERALL FLOOR PLAN
PICTURE INTO CRATER FROM PATHWAYSITE PLAN
Ultimately the ‘slotting, pin motion’, connection proved to handle the change in terrain quite well, as it can grow easily and slot to-gether with other members as necesary. The covered structures would have transluscent roof systems, with wood clad walls. The space would feel warm, and sunlit, as the intention was to embrace the Arboretum,
70
DESIGN PRINCIPLES-
71INSTRUCTOR: RICHARD GRISWOLD
The Bohem-Kemp Residence was
bedrooms provide a level of privacy, as well as access to the main living
‘naive’ style living allows for maxi-mum, natural light, through a strip of clerestory windows. In conclusion, the residence serves as an excellent,
72
The Thorn Crown Chapel is a stun-ning piece of architecture. The initial reaction that I gained from this project was that the architect’s ambition to blur and blend the inside with the outside was very successful. The contruction of the roof seems to mesh with the canopy of the sur-rounding trees, giving the impres-sion that architecture and forest are seemless.
73INSTRUCTOR: RICHARD GRISWOLD
The Villa Savoye by Le Corbusier -
cent design that boasts minimalism, aimed towards comfortable and leisure of the occupants. The combi-nation of massing, use of columns, horizontal windows, and free design of the facade, allowed Le Corbusi-er to create a beautiful example of modern architecture.
74
The Notre Dame du Haut is unques-tionably organic, and gestural. How-ever, out of this organic form, have emerged a dynamic choreography of spatial relationships, as well as a dynamic use of perforations in the exterior wall to allow light to perco-late into the space.
75INSTRUCTOR: RICHARD GRISWOLD
The Hermoscopium house was one of my favorite studies during this course. It showed
-tionship between the architec-ture, and structure, rather than compromising one or the other.
76
SKETCH PROBLEM 1
proble was to create a stage for a wheelchair-bound musician, with impaired sight. All areas must be universally accessible.
Front View Rear View
Perspective from Above Client’s Perspective
Due to the time constraint of
-
sign choices, while delivering a
high quality project that re-
sponds to the design criteria.
77INSTRUCTOR: IAN TABENER
roof not only provides shelter, but the geometry also serves as a means of broadcasting
to show a change in direction, or height, a partial height wall for safety. The last consid-eration was to engrave excerpts from the client’s favorite novel into the wall behind the performance stage, in braille.
78
SKETCH PROBLEM 2
exercise that allows students
peers, so that an individual’s process is informed by others. The design intention of this exercise was to create a sin-gle-story hostle in an urban environment. This submission could be done digitally, without the need for a physical model to be constructed.
79INSTRUCTOR: KERRI FRICK
80
CHARCOAL
81
82
83
Professional
JSA ARCHITECTS
GREAT BAY COMMUNITY COLLEGEMcCONNELL HALL, UNH
STENBAK DESIGN ASSOCIATESFORD AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIP
VILLENEUVE HOME98-10592-97
86-91
106-109
86
FORD DEALERSHIP
The objective of this project was to evaluate the current condition of the dealership, as com-pared to the standards that have been developed by Ford’s in-house design team. The scope of this project involved removing existing cladding on 50% of the building, while the rest was to be re-treated with surface applied coatings. This renovation also involved adding an ad-
bring the current exterior facade up to standards. Not only would we be creating an addition,
NAME OF FIRM: STENBAK DESIGN ASSOCIATESCLIENT: AUTOFAIR LOCATION: MANCHESTER, NHROLE: ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER
-
ORIGINAL
87
existing drawings, we began to notice inconsistences, and began questioning the existing condition drawings. As a result, I spent several days photographing every single condition possible, to ensure there were no inconsistencies. This allowed me to learn how to create ex-
DESIGN SKILLS:
88
The plans and rendering sent by Ford’s in-house team was quite simple, but did not solve the problems that the deal-
Rather than simply meet the require-ments of Ford, we chose to propose an addition being added on. This would
their growing location
FORD RENDERING
89
-sion of the addition, not only for Ford’s approval, but for the clients approval as well. We went on to develop full Construction Documents, for the facades, as well as the interior por-tion of the dealership. The image above, and the following images were developed with Pho-
in from dwg format, and translated to pln.
STENBAK RENDERING
90
just one example of the process that we underwent in order to renovate the existing conditions. Every employee was interviewed by myself in order to establish a general consensus of what their frustrations were with their current arrangement, and how we could start to rectify these issues, with a hope to boost pro-ductivity.
EXISTING PROPOSED
CURRENT
9191
The project ultimately was a success, as it was on time and on budget. The client reports seeing employees being generally much happier with their renovated space, and especially
criteria originally presented to us, and in a timely manner.
CURRENT
92
McConnell Hall
The objective of this project was to renovate an existing campus building that was original-ly the Whittemore School of Business. UNH, during the previous summer, constructed Paul College, the new Business School, to accomodate the growing population of students. McCon-nell Hall would be the new home for the Psychology Department, with a renovation budget of
collaborative space where students could interact, and access online resources.
NAME OF FIRM: JSA, IncCLIENT: University of New Hampshire (UNH) LOCATION: DURHAM, NHROLE: ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER/INTERN
The existing building used to be a S.O.M. building from the 1960’s. The structural systems are primarily made of cast-in-place concrete, while
“legos” by a crane.
ORIGINAL
93
-
-
into Construction Documents.
DESIGN SKILLS:
Existing Condition Field Measurements were a vital part of this exercise in bring the drawings from a conceptual stage, into schematic, and eventually into construction documents.
94
-
way into our Final Set.
95
The relationship with the contractor was design/build, something I was very used to, only this project was on a much larger scale. It was fascinating to watch the construction of
time and on budget.
This project provided a very in-depth experience of construction administration. I at-
them organized became apart of a daily routine, as the project timeline proceeded.
9. 10.
11.
Report By: Steve Hebsch
4th Floor Office Looking towards Window Soffit
4th Floor Office Looking towards Window Sill LightGauge Framing
It was noted to NBC thatthese conduits/pipes were too low, and NBC noted they were aware of this, and there were plans to correct their location.
01-10-2014 UNH – McConnell Hall Renovation Page 4 of 4
FIELD REPORT
____________________________________________________________________Work in progress:
1. - 4th Floora. Window Sill Framing installedb. Duct Work in Progressc. Raceways are in, wiring not rund. Light gauge Framing Nearly Complete
2. – 3rd Floora. Light gauge Framing Nearly Completeb. Raceways are started
3. –2nd Floora. Light gauge Framing in Progress
4. – 1st Floora. Light gauge Framing in Progress
i. *NOTE: Work is going in order from top to bottom, 1st Floor will be last to be completed.
Observations:1. – Site is neat and orderly2. Work is being performed from the 4th Floor down.
Items to verify:1. Construction of Sills – Light gauge framing seems well constructed.
Information or Action required:1. N/A
Attachments:1. None
Date: January 10, 2014
Project: UNHMcConnell Hall Renovation
Attendees: Chuck Acevedo, NBCRich Rouleau, UNHNorth Sturtevant, JSASteve Hebsch, JSA
Weather: Light Snow, 30º F
Time: 12:45 pm
01-10-2014 UNH – McConnell Hall Renovation Page 1 of 4
96
the project was by fair in the Academic Commons. This space originally was dubbed, the Reading Room by S.O.M. It has been transformed into a welcom-ing space that can be used by students for a large portion of the day. The Ren-dering was produced using Revit, and post-production with Photoshop CC.
JSA RENDERING
DURING CONSTRUCTION
COMPLETE
97
Overall, the project was a great success, and students report the space to be warm, and in-viting. Teachers have also reported to be enjoying their new classrooms. This project orig-
existing building, that will see many more years of operation.
2ND FLOOR LECTURE HALL
98
Student Success Center
The objective of this project was to renovate the main existing building on campus, to accom-modate an addition for what Great Bay Community College called, a Student Success Center. The program involves a Gymnasium Space, Student Lounge, a Fitness Center, Conference
of 5m. Unfortunately the budget became very dictating to what scope would be on this side of
NAME OF FIRM: JSA, IncCLIENT: Great Bay Community College (CCSNH)LOCATION: PORTSMOUTH, NHROLE: ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER/INTERN
Above is an image generated early on of the Student Success Center on the west
99
After re-evaluating the best approach, we made the decision to change the sides of the build-ing upon which the addition would be constructed. The other side of the building has less issues with site conditions, and would reduce the scope of the project in a variety, to create less ten-sion on the budget. I was heavily involved with the reprogramming of the addition on the East Side.
-chitect and Design Principal throughout this process.
100
order to meet proper capacity and ADA requirements.
101
As the project progressed on, it was my responsibility to generate details for the project. The
that instead of typical wood construction, or steel construction, we would be utilizing an exterior envelope that is composed of an insulated metal panel. This required many iterations, and re-search, to ensure that our details would be of the highest quality possible.
102
103
This was a very detailed Revit Model. It not only had the architecture discipline, but also contained structural, and even some mechanical. We routinely exchanged our
104
During Design Development, and in the early stages of Construction Documents, we created elevation studies of the building use the insulated panel system. In order to
105
As a result of researching thermal envelope, as well as numerous schematic iterations, we have been able to issue 100% Construction Documents. I will be participating in Construction Administration as support, assisting in creating ASI’s and responding to RFI’s, but not acting as the primary contact. Currently this project is under construc-
DN
UP
W/D
REF.
UP
UPUP
9 10 12 13
14
14 15 16 1711 11.1
B
C
D D
E.1
F
G
H
I
E.1A
28
'-0"
28
'-0"
6'-1
0"
24
'-0"
23
'-0"
28
'-0"
28
'-0"
EXISTING BUILDING TOREMAIN
GYMNASIUM1221
FITNESS1211
OFFICE1206
GAMES1202B
OFFICE1205
5 1/8"
4 7/8"
STORAGE1221B
MECH /ELEC
1224
CORRIDOR1215
VEST1214
STUDENTLOUNGE1202
5 1
/16
"
AV/DATA1221A
STORAGE1225
WOMENS1217
MENS1218
BILLIARDS1202A
OFFICE1207
STOR1209B
FAMILYRESTROOM1215B
VESTIBULE1201
CONFERENCEROOM /
MULTIPURPOSE1219
OFFICE1203
OFFICE1204
MENSLOCKER1212
8'-4 7/8"
STOR1209A
FITNESSOFFICE1211A
INFO /CANTEEN1215A
TEAMLOCKER1223
TRAINING/LAUNDRY1221C
78
'-0"
1
A3.01
1
A3.02
CORRIDOR1299
CORRIDOR1209
CORRIDOR1216
WOMENSLOCKER1213
TEAMLOCKER1222
-6"0" .
UP
UP
A1.011
A1.021
10 13/16"
6'
6'
3'
3'
7'2'
2'
5'
5'
4'
4'
A'
E'
D'
C'
B'
J'J'
H'H'
K'K'
F'
1'
1'
D.2'
G'
29
'-4" 26
'-2 1
/2"
26
'-2 1
/2"
26
'-2 1
/2"
6'-1
0 1
/2"
19
'-4"
18
'-5 1
/2"
18
'-2 1
/2"
17
'-2"
17
'-7"
13
'-8 1
/2"
1
A3.03
2
A3.03
2
A3.13
1
A3.12
DN
DN
14
'-87
/8"
17
'-7"
13
'-81
/2"
13'-9 1/4"
1.1'
1'-7 3/4"
6"
1'-1
1 1
/4"
6"
6"
3.2' 5.8'
2
A3.01
1
A3.04
2
A3.02
2
A3.04
MATCH LINE
1'-0
"
CUST.1209C
4.5' 5.5'
4.7
G.6
12'-0" 11'-8" 8'-4 1/2" 17'-8" 18'-5" 7'-7 1/2" 20'-8 1/2" 5'-4" 19'-7 3/4"
10
'-4 5
/8"6
'-9 3
/8"
3.5'12'-0" 11'-8" 13'-0 1/4" 13'-0 1/4" 13'-0 1/4" 13'-0 1/4" 13'-0 1/4" 13'-0 1/4"
2'-5
1/4
"
4'-9
1/8
"
106
VILLENEUVE HOME
The objective of this project was to design a home for a family of four. The home will need to
to the location in Tennessee. This request for services initially came from my previous dept.
a competent that would be interested in provided drafting and design services. This was the
-ing for he and his family in TN.
CLIENT: VILLENEUVE FAMILYLOCATION: MURFREESBORO, TNROLE: ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNER/INTERN
Above is the NH home in which the family previously resided in. The home exterior
frame was carefully dismantled and brought to Bedford, NH, and reassembled here. The interior is extremely comfortable and provides ample natural light.
107
During the early stage of the process, there was a possibility of staying in NH, but after numerous studies and iterations, it was decided that a move to Tennessee would be the best route for the family.
This decision was followed by an intense charette process that resulted in a home
108
In addition to Floor Plans and Elevations, I also generated a lumber list, to help es-tablish pricing.
109
Pictures of the home above, showing construction progress.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME!