steppin stone method

download steppin stone method

of 18

Transcript of steppin stone method

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    1/18

    The Stepping-Stone Method

    The stepping-stone method is an iterative technique for moving from aninitial feasible solution to an optimal solution.

    It is used to evaluate the cost effectiveness of shipping goods via

    transportation routes not currently in the solution.

    Each unused cell ,or square, in the transportation table is tested by askingthe following question: What would happen to total shipping costs if one unit of

    product (for example, one desk) were tentatively shipped on an unused route ?

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    2/18

    This testing of each unused square is conducted as follows:

    Select an unused square to be evaluated.

    Beginning at this square, trace a closed path back to the original squarevia squares that are currently being used (only horizontal and verticalmoves are allowed).

    Beginning with a plus (+) sign at the unused square, place alternate

    minus (-) signs and plus signs on each corner square of time closedpath just traced.Calculate an improvement index by adding together the unit costfigures found in each square containing a plus sign and then subtracting

    the unit costs in each square containing a minus sign.

    Repeat steps l 4 until an improvement index has been calculated forall unused squares. If all indices computed are greater than or equal tozero, an optimal solution lies been reached. If not, it is possible toimprove the current solution and decrease total shipping costs

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    3/18

    Consider the table given below

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    4/18

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    5/18

    ` We can use the northwest corner rule to find an initial feasiblesolution to the Executive Furniture Corp. problem shown in the

    Table.` It takes five steps in this example to make the initial

    shopping assignments:

    Assign 100 units from Des Moines to Albuquerque (exhaustingDes Moines supply).

    Assign 200 units from Evansville to Albuquerque (exhaustingAlbuquerques demand).

    Assign 100 units from Evansville to Boston (exhaustingEvansvilles supply).

    Assign 100 units from Ft. Lauderdale to Boston (exhaustingBostons demand).

    Assign 200 units from Ft. Lauderdale to Cleveland (exhaustingClevelands demand and Ft. Lauderdales supply).

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    6/18

    We can easily compute the cost of this shipping assignment

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    7/18

    ` The solution given here is feasible since demand-and-supply constraints are all satisfied.

    ` It would be very lucky if this solution yielded theminimal transportation cost for the problem, however.

    ` It is more likely that one of the iterative proceduresdesigned to help reach an optimal solution shall have tobe employed.

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    8/18

    An improvement index for the Des Moines - Boston route is now

    computed by adding unit costs in squares with plus signs and subtractingcosts in squares with minus signs. Hence

    Des Moines Boston index = + $4 - $5 + $8 - $4 = +$3

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    9/18

    Des Moines Cleveland index = +$3 - $5 + $8 - $4 + $7 - $5 = $4Thus, opening this route will also not lower our total shipping costs. Theother two routes may be evaluated in a similar fashion.

    Evansville Cleveland index = +$3 - $4 + $7 - $5 = +$1 (Closed path is

    +EC EB + FB FC)Fort Lauderdale Albuquerque index = +$9 - $7 + $4 - $8 = -$2 (Closedpath is +FA FB + EB EA)Because the second index is negative, a cost savings may be attained by

    making use of the (currently unused) Fort Lauderdale to Albuquerque

    route.

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    10/18

    Each negative index represents the amount by which total transportationcosts could be decreased if one unit or product were shipped by that

    sourcedestination combination.

    The next step, then, is to choose that route (unused square) with the largestnegative improvement index.

    W

    e can then ship the maximum allowable number of units on that routeand reduce the total cost accordingly.

    The maximum quantity that can be shipped on the new money-saving routecan be found by referring to the closed path of plus signs and minus signs

    drawn for the route and selecting the smallest number found in thosesquares containing minus signs.

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    11/18

    To obtain a new solution, that number is added to all squares on the closedpath with plus signs and subtracted from all squares on the path assignedminus signs.

    One iteration of the stepping-stone method is now complete. Again, we

    must test to see if it is optimal or whether any further improvements can bemade.

    That is done by evaluating each unused square as described in the stepslisted earlier.

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    12/18

    To improve Executive Furnitures solution we make use of theimprovement indices calculated and The largest (and only) negative index is

    found on the Fort Lauderdale to Albuquerque route. We repeat thetransportation table for the problem below

    The maximum quantity that may be shipped on the newly opened route(FA) is the smallest number found in squares containing minus signs-inthis case, 100 units.

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    13/18

    Hence, we add 100 units to the 0 now being shipped on route FA; thenproceed to subtract 100 from route FB, leaving zero in that square (but still

    balancing the row total for F); then add 100 to route B yielding 200; andfinally, subtract 100 from route EA, leaving 100 units shipped. Note thatthe new members still produce the correct row and column totals as

    required.

    The new solution is shown in the following table:

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    14/18

    Total shipping cost has been reduced by (100 units) X ($2 saved/unit) =200,and is now $4,000, This cost figure can, of course, also be derived bymultiplying each unit shipping cost times the number of units transported

    on its route, namely,

    lOO($5) + l00( $8) + 100($9) + 200($5) = $4,000

    Now again doing the same procedure to recheck if it is optimized or not

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    15/18

    ` Again Calculating Improvementindex for each

    unallocatedcell.

    A B C Supply

    D 5

    100

    4

    $3

    3

    $2

    100

    E 8

    100

    4

    200

    3

    $(-1)

    300

    F 9

    100

    7

    $2

    5

    200

    300

    Demand 300 200 200 700

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    16/18

    A B C Supply

    D 5

    100

    4

    $3

    3

    $2

    100

    E 8

    100

    4

    200

    3

    $(-1)

    300

    F 9

    100

    7

    $2

    5

    200

    300

    Demand 300 200 200 700

    Add

    Add Less

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    17/18

    A B C Supply

    D 5

    100

    4 3 100

    E 8 4

    200

    3

    100

    300

    F 9

    200

    7 5

    100

    300

    Demand 300 200 200 700

  • 8/7/2019 steppin stone method

    18/18

    ` Modified Transportation Cost

    ` TC=(100*$5)+(400*$2)+(100*$3)+(900*$2)+(100*$5)

    ` TC=$3900

    Thank You