Stephen M. Millett, Ph.D. Founder and Managing Member Futuring Associates LLC December 2007...
-
Upload
megan-osborne -
Category
Documents
-
view
238 -
download
0
Transcript of Stephen M. Millett, Ph.D. Founder and Managing Member Futuring Associates LLC December 2007...
Stephen M. Millett, Ph.D.Founder and Managing Member
Futuring Associates LLCDecember 2007
Copyright 2007 Futuring Associates LLC (All rights reserved)
A. If “the future” cannot be predicted, it can be anticipated with varying degrees of uncertainty
B. Futuring and visioning are different perspectives, and they must be done together
C. Trends should be identified, tracked, and integrated into alternative futures with potential disruptive events and flexible responses
All predictions and forecasts are conditional (if…), and certainty is based upon known variables, constant relationships among the variables, system stability, timeframe, and lack of unexpected events.
Nobody has data from the future – all forecasts are conjectures, even hypotheses, subject to validation or revision by further information…and
Anticipating the future is a continuous process: there are no immutable forecasts or immutable futures, just more and better information.
“Forecasts” should be broadly defined to include qualitative descriptions, not just specific events and numbers.
The future will be a combination of continuity and change – but the mix can vary greatly.
Thinking about the future leads to anticipating and preparing for future conditions – there are benefits beyond the accuracy of forecasts (team-building, strategy-making, empowerment, and adaptability)
Futuring requires familiarity with many trends, solid logic, modeling and simulations, planning, preparation, and flexibility (a rationalist, if not positivist, approach requiring both qualitative and quantitative methods)
The past: an historian, who already knows what happened, can reconstruct (to varying degrees of completeness depending upon surviving evidence) how something occurred – the reconstructed linear path looks almost deterministic (only signal, no noise)
The present: we think we know what is going on, but we never have complete information; we know that the present was produced by the past and will affect the future, but with many possibilities (signal buried in lots of noise)
The future: a combination of long-term trends, short-term actions, and unforeseen and disruptive events (black and white swans)
“Futuring is a systematic process of thinking about the future in order to frame reasonable expectations, to identify emerging opportunities and threats to the company of organization, and to anticipate actions that will promote desired outcomes….One thinks through the problem from the macroscopic, external environment to the microscopic factors of a company or organization…”
“Visioning is the opposite of futuring: it is a logical process that progresses from the micro- to the macro-levels.”
Source: Stephen M. Millett, “Futuring and visioning: complementary approaches to strategic decision making,” Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2006, pp. 43-50 (quotes on pp. 43, 45).
Exterior-Interior approach of Futuring
Interior-Exterior Approach of Visioning
Plans and Actions
Global and National Trends
Consumer/Market Trends
Specific Opportunities
Goals, Strategies, and Investments
Competencies and Technologies
Corporate Culture and Assets
VISIONING
FUTURING
External trends move faster than internal conditions
The primary barriers to internal changes (deviations or innovations) are corporate culture and fixed assets (sunk capital).
There will always be a misalignment of external environments and internal conditions – the question is how long and how wide the misalignment becomes.
Use expert judgment to identify the most important trends to monitor – but use scanning as peripheral vision (75%/25%)
Also use expert judgment to try to identify possible disruptive events
Perform consistent trend tracking and analysis as a type of pattern recognition
Generate scenarios for alternative futures, derive robust strategies, anticipate contingencies, and simulate changes
What do you do about multiple trends? Do they positively or negatively impact each other? You need to integrate trends into net assessments.
Scenarios provide a way to integrate trends into alternative descriptions of the future
Scenarios also allow you to introduce disruptive events to see how they might change the scenarios
You should generate “futuring” scenarios first, then identify what is the most preferred scenario and what needs to occur – this provides a framework for “visioning” leading to plans and actions.
Type I: the background (or pattern) is well known – we are looking for and changes and new elements
Type II: the background means little or nothing – we are looking for a specific signal
Type III: we do not know the background or the signal – we are gathering and plotting data looking for a pattern
The Recentness Effect: what appears important today is assumed to be important tomorrow – being overly influence by today’s news (linear projections)
Bias: being either too optimistic or too pessimistic or assuming that what one wants is what will happen (the sins of wishful thinking, self-interest, or advocacy)
Type 2 Errors, or Sins of Omission: not including factors that emerge as very important in the future
Disruptive Events, or “Black Swan”: high consequence, low probability events that are difficult if not impossible to predict
Ignorance about trends and true conditions today – lack of adequate and correct information
Miscalculation: identifying the right variables, but incorrectly defining or misestimating values/ranges
Energy: sources, prices, and efficiencies (especially oil, diesel, coal, and alternative sources for electricity)
Carbon dioxide management and global climate change
Systems management innovations in information and communication technologies (ICT)
Expectations for real-time transactions and transparency
Consumer value and spending Sustained economic growth Increasing global trade and competition Availability of human talent New partnerships between private and
public sectors, especially for high budget infrastructure
Acts of terrorism with long-term consequences
A stupendous accident with great collateral damage (both physical and psychological)
Very sudden, very high spike in global oil prices
Political and economic upheaval in China Severe limitations on carbon emissions A pandemic that takes people out of the
system
Do occasional futuring studies to provide guidance for long-term strategies, plans, and investments [Principle A]
Develop a point of view about the future and share it with your customers (thought leadership) [Principles A and B]
Combine futuring with visioning (don’t do just one or the other) – futuring and visioning workshops should occur at least once a year and lead to operational plans [Principles B and C]
Set up a monitoring and scanning system with continual distribution of information [Principle C]
Revise forecasts and make changes as new information and conditions warrant [Principles A and C]
Develop robust strategies based on both futuring and visioning and be prepared to be adaptable [Principal C]
Stephen M. Millett, Ph.D.Founder and Managing Member,Futuring Associates LLC3673 Tillbury Ave.Columbus, Ohio 43220 USA(614) [email protected]
Founder and Managing Member, Futuring Associates LLC, 2007-
Researcher, manager, and futurist at Battelle, Columbus, Ohio, 1979-2006
Member at Large, State Board of Education, Ohio, 2003-
Founding member of the Association of Professional Futurists and professional member of the World Futures Society
Author or co-author of four books and 28 journal articles; inventor listed on one patent
Officer, US Air Force, 1971-1979 Ph.D., history, The Ohio State University, 1972