STD/PASS/TAGS – Trade and Globalisation Statistics STD/SES/TAGS – Trade and Globalisation...

STD/PASS/TAGS – Trade and Globalisation StatisticsSTD/PASS/TAGS – Trade and Globalisation StatisticsSTD/SES/TAGS – Trade and Globalisation StatisticsSTD/SES/TAGS – Trade and Globalisation Statistics

Linking trade with Linking trade with structural business structural business statisticsstatistics

OECD progress report on

trade by enterprise characteristics

AgendaAgendaItem 8aItem 8aAgendaAgendaItem 8aItem 8a

Florian Eberth, STD/SES/TAGS; 1Florian Eberth, STD/SES/TAGS; 1stst WPTGS Meeting 22.-24.09.2008, Paris WPTGS Meeting 22.-24.09.2008, Paris


2

BackgroundBackground

•One of the main future development areas for external trade statistics is

to link them more closely to other statistics. The linkage of trade statistics

with business statistics allows to measure, on the one hand, the

contribution of real economic sectors to trading, and on the other hand, to

complement business data with detailed information on trade.

• Trade by size of enterprise broken down by sector of activity, by export

markets, and by location (e.g. region) not only allows analyzing trade

effects on employment and value added, but also to “map” performances.

• Such an analysis requires data from two different statistical sourcesfrom two different statistical sources:

business/industrial statistics and foreign trade statistics.


3

• Under guidance of the OECD Steering Group “Business Economic

Statistics and Trade (BEST)”, a first OECD set of Linkage Tables

was sent out to participating Non-EU-OECD member countries in

June 2007. The tables are in line with Eurostat’s methodology

applied, but have been amended in two respects (UN classifications

instead of EU classifications and OECD’s Geo-Nomenclature

instead of Eurostat’s Geo-Nomenclature) to enable Non-EU

countries to respond.

BackgroundBackground


4

Current status quoCurrent status quo

• Up to now, OECD has received data collection tables from Canada, the United States and Norway. In addition to that, Eurostat provided OECD with the respective (published) data tables of several EU member states for reference year 2003.

• The Eurostat tables were – as far as possible – converted to OECD methodology ($US, geo-nomenclature, ISIC instead of NACE) and integrated into OECD’s new database on Trade by Enterprise Characteristics.


5

OECD OECD database structure TECdatabase structure TEC

3: TEC by partner zones and countries

1: TEC by size classes

2: TEC by top enterprises

4: TEC by number of partner countries

5: TEC by commodities (CPC)

Data available for:

Note: The extent of data availability varies between countries. Data for EU member states refer in many cases to extra-trade only.


6

• A theme called “Trade by Enterprise Characteristics” has been added to the OECD data warehouse, OECD.STAT, within the Globalisation cube:

Data accessData access

• The theme consists of the five data subsets, called I to V (‘TEC by size classes’ up to ‘TEC by commodity groups (CPC)’).

• While datasets I, III and IV come with two two indicators eachindicators each, one of them referring to ‘number of enterprises’ and the other one to ‘Trade value’, datasets II and V deliver value value figures ($US). figures ($US).


7

Concentration of trade (showcase example from dataset II)

Data accessData access

This new OECD.STAT theme within the Globalisation cube of course offers the usual functionalities that OECD.STAT provides for all datasets (drag & drop-functionality, individual queries, individual user-defined views, standard charts, download formats etc.).


8

• The methodologies used can be accessed via the metadata functionalities of OECD.STAT (red “i”), both metadata for the top-level (general methodology for the whole theme) and detailed level as well (e.g. detailed information about matching ratios by country).

Metadata access:Metadata access:Top-level metadata Top-level metadata


9

Metadata access:Metadata access:Detailed-level metadata Detailed-level metadata

(here: Country metadata for Denmark)


10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Top5

Top50

Top100

Top1000

Concentration of Trade: Concentration of Trade: Share (%) of export value by top enterprises (2003)

For 9 out of 16 countries,the top 100 enterprisescovered at least 50% of thetotal exports.


0102030405060708090

Aust

ria

Belg

ium

Cana

da

Czec

h Re

publ

ic

Den

mar

k

Finl

and

Fran

ce

Hun

gary

Icel

and

Ital

y

Luxe

mbo

urg

Nor

way

Pola

nd

Slov

ak R

epub

lic

Swed

en

Uni

ted

Stat

es

Esto

nia

Slov

enia

250+

0-249

11

Concentration of Trade: Concentration of Trade: Share (%) of total export value by number of employees, 2003

USA/CAN: Dominance of enterprises 250+

ISL/EST/DNK: Dominance of enterprises 0-249


12

Number of enterprises that exported to Russia, China and JapanNumber of enterprises that exported to Russia, China and JapanISIC sectors C-E, 2003

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000

Austria

Canada

Czech Republic

Denmark

Finland

France

Hungary

Italy

Norway

Poland

Sweden

United States

Russian Federation

China

Japan


13

Top exporters (ISIC) of basic chemicals (CPC 34),Top exporters (ISIC) of basic chemicals (CPC 34),USA, 2003, in % of total exports of CPC 34USA, 2003, in % of total exports of CPC 34

60

11

9

4

3

1

1

1

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

24: Manuf. of chemicals and chemical products

26: Manuf. of other non-metallic mineral products

50: Sale, maint. and repair of motor vehicles/cycles, retail sale of fuel

51: Wholesale trade and commission trade, except of motor vehicles and motorcycles

29: Manuf. of machinery and equipment n.e.c.

21: Manuf. of paper and paper products

27: Manuf. of basic metals

23: Manuf. of coke, refined petroleum products and nuclear fuel


14

Number of enterprises according to number of partner countries (Imports) Number of enterprises according to number of partner countries (Imports) ISIC C-E (Mining and quarrying, total manufacturing, electricity, gas and water supply),

% of total, 2003

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1: 1

2: 2

3: 3

4: 4-5

5: 6-7

6: 8-10

7: 11-13

8: 14+


15

Trade value according to number of partner countries (Imports) Trade value according to number of partner countries (Imports) ISIC C-E (Mining and quarrying, total manufacturing, electricity, gas and water supply),

% of total, 2003

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1: 1

2: 2

3: 3

4: 4-5

5: 6-7

6: 8-10

7: 11-13

8: 14+


16

Number of enterprises according to number of partner countries (Exports) Number of enterprises according to number of partner countries (Exports) ISIC C-E (Mining and quarrying, total manufacturing, electricity, gas and water supply),

% of total, 2003

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1: 1

2: 2

3: 3

4: 4-5

5: 6-7

6: 8-10

7: 11-13

8: 14+


17

Trade value according to number of partner countries (Exports) Trade value according to number of partner countries (Exports) ISIC C-E (Mining and quarrying, total manufacturing, electricity, gas and water supply),

% of total, 2003

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1: 1

2: 2

3: 3

4: 4-5

5: 6-7

6: 8-10

7: 11-13

8: 14+


18

• OECD will send out the current database sheets to the respective member

countries for final verification/approval before publishing the TEC database.

• OECD will continue the close co-operation with Eurostat. Eurostat’s

Standardisation Exercise 2008 (Reference year 2005) will be the starting point

for the next data collection on OECD-level (non-EU-OECD member countries).

The concrete details will be elaborated by the next B.E.S.T. steering group

meeting in early 2009.

The road aheadThe road ahead


19

• Non-EU-OECD member countries that are not yet participating in the data

collection are very much invited to join the data collection, especially OECD Asia

and Oceania. OECD Accession Countries (please note that Israel already

volunteered to participate) and countries of the Enhanced Engagement Program

of the OECD are welcome to join as well.

• OECD has, thus, made quite significant progress in this policy-relevant area,

enabling a new and innovative world-wide view on trade by enterprise

characteristics. It is OECD’s intention to further fine-tune the database with

respect to possible additional indicators and to enlarge the availability of

countries.

• Unlike Eurostat, OECD cannot encourage countries to join in through financial

incentives. It is, nevertheless, hoped that several countries will join in on a

voluntary basis. OECD expresses its gratitude to participating Non-EU countries

and to Eurostat for the excellent co-operation.

The road ahead (2)The road ahead (2)


20

Delegates are invited to:Delegates are invited to:

• Comment on the project and -eventually- voice interest in active participation.

• Not yet participating Non-EU countries are invited to comment on their possibility to compile data according to the standard table framework provided and flag scope for co-operation with OECD.

• Comment on the project and -eventually- voice interest in active participation.

• Not yet participating Non-EU countries are invited to comment on their possibility to compile data according to the standard table framework provided and flag scope for co-operation with OECD.


21

Thank you for your attention.

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

STD/PASS/TAGS – Trade and Globalisation Statistics STD/SES/TAGS – Trade and Globalisation...

Documents

Transcript of STD/PASS/TAGS – Trade and Globalisation Statistics STD/SES/TAGS – Trade and Globalisation...