Static and modal behaviour of the clic main beam bpm support
description
Transcript of Static and modal behaviour of the clic main beam bpm support
![Page 1: Static and modal behaviour of the clic main beam bpm support](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681615a550346895dd0e4f4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
STATIC AND MODAL BEHAVIOUR OF THE CLIC MAIN BEAM BPM SUPPORTM. Esposito, EN-MME
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission under the FP7 Research Infrastructures project EuCARD
CLIC Test Module meeting 7th March 2012
![Page 2: Static and modal behaviour of the clic main beam bpm support](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681615a550346895dd0e4f4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Model 2
BPM Support(304L)
Alignment target Support (316L)
Flange
Upstream body (316LN)
MainBody(316LN)
Intermediate body (316LN)
Chamber adapter (304L)
Mass of BPM Support: ~0.2kgMass of BPM Assembly: ~0.7kg Mass of Align. Support: ~0.14kg
M. Esposito, Test Module Meeting, CERN 7 March 2012
![Page 3: Static and modal behaviour of the clic main beam bpm support](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681615a550346895dd0e4f4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Boundary Conditions3
M. Esposito, Test Module Meeting, CERN 7 March 2012
Support is fixed to the magnet & the chamber adapter is fixed to the vacuum chamber which are considered fixed
The BPM assembly is considered free on this side
![Page 4: Static and modal behaviour of the clic main beam bpm support](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681615a550346895dd0e4f4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Static Structural Analysis4
M. Esposito, Test Module Meeting, CERN 7 March 2012
Effect of weight: 0.13 μm center 0.4 μm max
Vertical stiffness: 55 N/μm center 41 N/μm min
Lateral stiffness: 15.5 N/μm center 9.1 N/μm min
Longitudinal stiffness: 769 N/μm center 250 N/μm min
![Page 5: Static and modal behaviour of the clic main beam bpm support](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681615a550346895dd0e4f4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Modal Analysis5
M. Esposito, Test Module Meeting, CERN 7 March 2012
1st mode (yaw)
2nd mode(pitch)
3rd mode (yaw with torsion)
f1=650 Hz f2=903 Hz f3=1506 Hz
![Page 6: Static and modal behaviour of the clic main beam bpm support](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681615a550346895dd0e4f4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Comparison between with and without BPM support
6
M. Esposito, Test Module Meeting, CERN 7 March 2012
WITH SUPPORT WITHOUT SUPPORTcenter worst center worst
STATIC Effect of Gravity
[μm]
0.13 0.4 0.7 1.4
Vertical stiffness [N/μm]
55 41 9.1 7.7
Lateral stiffness [N/μm]
15.5 9.1 10 8.3
Longitudinal stiffness [N/μm]
769 250 909 714
f [Hz] shape f [Hz] shapeMODAL Mode 1 650 yaw 529 pitch
Mode 2 903 pitch 585 yaw
Mode 3 1506 yaw (torsion)
960 roll
![Page 7: Static and modal behaviour of the clic main beam bpm support](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681615a550346895dd0e4f4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Comparison between BPM fully fixed to chamber & fixed only longitudinally
7
M. Esposito, Test Module Meeting, CERN 7 March 2012
FIXED TO CHAMBER FIXED LONGITUDINALLY
center worst center worstSTATIC Effect of
Gravity [μm]
0.13 0.4 0.67 0.67
Vertical stiffness [N/μm]
55 41 15.4 15.4
Lateral stiffness [N/μm]
15.5 9.1 1.7 0.9
Longitudinal stiffness [N/μm]
769 250 769 769
f [Hz] shape f [Hz] shapeMODAL Mode 1 650 yaw 194 lateral
Mode 2 903 pitch 660 pitch+vertical
Mode 3 1506 yaw (torsion)
903 pitch
![Page 8: Static and modal behaviour of the clic main beam bpm support](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681615a550346895dd0e4f4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Conclusions8
M. Esposito, Test Module Meeting, CERN 7 March 2012
•A static structural and a modal analysis of the MB BPM support has been
performed and results show that the structure is quite robust against
external forces and very stiff
•The BPM support gives little help in terms of modal behaviour, which is
already very good, but it gives a significant contribution in terms of
vertical stiffness
•Great attention has to be given to the rigidity of the beam chamber
connected to the BPM because it is responsible in major part of the
robustness and stiffness of the whole structure
![Page 9: Static and modal behaviour of the clic main beam bpm support](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681615a550346895dd0e4f4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
M. Esposito, Test Module Meeting, CERN 7 March 2012
SPARE SLIDES
![Page 10: Static and modal behaviour of the clic main beam bpm support](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062222/5681615a550346895dd0e4f4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Displacement during installation
10
M. Esposito, Test Module Meeting, CERN 7 March 2012
Support pulls BPM 10 microns horizontally
Support pulls BPM 10 microns vertically