Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

15
Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University Evaluation Session: Gateway Cities Education Agenda - English Language Learners Enrichment Academies

description

Evaluation Session: Gateway Cities Education Agenda - English Language Learners Enrichment Academies. Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University. Evaluation Goals. Support Implementation Share successful strategies Identify and problem-solve challenges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Page 1: Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Statewide ConveningOctober 16, 2014

Worcester State University

Evaluation Session: Gateway Cities Education Agenda - English Language Learners Enrichment Academies

Page 2: Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Evaluation Goals

Support Implementation Share successful strategies Identify and problem-solve challenges

Improve Future Academies

Support Cross-Site Learning Network

Report on Implementation and Outcomes

2

Page 3: Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Evaluation Questions

1. Implementation: What program design and conditions need to be in place to ensure that the Summer Academies are implemented effectively? What conditions hinder implementation?

2. Student level impact: What is the impact of the Summer Academies on student outcomes? How and to what extent does impact on student outcomes differ across Summer Academy models?

3. Program partners (school, district, community) level impact: How and to what extent do the Summer Academies impact teachers, students, families? How will lessons and strategies be shared with schools and districts?

3

Page 4: Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Question 1: Data Collection

Implementation: What program design and conditions need to be in place to ensure that the Summer Academies are implemented effectively? What conditions hinder implementation?

How we collected data: Reviewed 20 Grant Applications Reviewed 8 2013 Interim Reports Conducted 6 site-visits (mid-/late- July)

• Observations, Focus Groups, Interviews, Collected Materials

Reviewing 20 Final Reports

4

Page 5: Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Question 1: Emerging Findings from Site Visits

Cross-Site Strengths:

High Expectations for ELLs

Caring teachers & staff

Safe environment for ELLs

Strong relationships with community partners

Culturally relevant recreational & enrichment activities

5

Page 6: Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Question 1: Emerging Findings from Site Visits cont.

Cross-Site Areas of Improvement:

Curriculum

Enrichment

Attendance

School-Year Practice

Community Partnerships

6

Page 7: Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Question 2: Data Collection

Student level impact: What is the impact of the Summer Academies on student outcomes? How and to what extent does impact on student outcomes differ across Summer Academy models?

How we collected data: Data capture Excel file:

• Site-Level Data

• Student-Level Data

• Summer enrollment & attendance

• Summer Pre- and post-test data

SY 2014 & SY 2015 State Student-level Data

• MCAS

• ACCESS

• SIMS

• SSDR

7

Page 8: Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Question 2: Emerging Findings

Total DaysTotal

Hours/DayTotal Hours

Mean 19 6.0 119

Min 16 3.5 56

Max 25 8 160

8

Duration of 20 academies:

Page 9: Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Question 2: Emerging Findings Cont.

Summer 2014 Data

# of Students in Academies

% of District ELL Enrollment

Attendance Rate

Mean 88 9% 83%

Min 17 1% 56%

Max 253 30% 98%

9

Students Served:

Page 10: Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Question 3: Data Collection

Program partners (school, district, community) level impact: How and to what extent do the Summer Academies impact teachers, students, families? How will lessons and strategies be shared with schools and districts?

How we collected data: Site-Visit Data:

• Teacher Focus Groups

• Parent Focus Groups

• Community Organization Focus Groups

Reviewing 20 Final Reports Document Fall Convening Conversations

10

Page 11: Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Question 3: Emerging Findings fromSite Visits

Eliminating Summer Learning Gap

Teacher-Student Relationships

Small Class Size

11

Page 12: Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Cross-Site Roundtable Discussions

Three topics:

A. Curriculum (Academic & Enrichment)

B. Family and Community Engagement

C. Impact of Academies on School Year Practice

12

Page 13: Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Roundtable Goals

Reflect upon your academy using indicators from ELL Practice Framework

Share your academy’s strengths and challenges with other sites

Discuss future collaborations or partnerships

Learn new strategies for 2015 academy

Share lessons and strategies with your schools and/or district

13

Page 14: Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Roundtable Discussions

Group 1: Student Center, Foster Room (All Sessions) Facilitator: Rosann Tung

Group 2: Student Center, Fallon Room (Sessions A&B) Session C, 1:40pm: Sullivan Academic Center Room 209 Facilitator: Ruth López

Group 3: Sullivan Academic Center Faculty Lounge Room 310 (All Sessions) Facilitator: Lynne Sacks

2:30pm-3pm Foster Room (ALL GROUPS)

14

Page 15: Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University

Questions? Comments?

Contact:Principal Investigator: Rosann Tung, Ph.D.

[email protected] Project Researcher: Ruth López,

[email protected]