Standing Committee Meetings – Technical Services · Bancroft and Cania View to 3G capable units...

2016

MONTO

North Burnett Regional Council

August, 2016

Standing Committee Meetings – Technical Services

North Burnett Regional Council Technical Services Agenda – 03/08/2016

NORTH BURNETT REGIONAL COUNCIL TECHNICAL STANDING COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA – MONTO – 03 AUGUST 2016

369

770251 Attendees Agenda Item 1 Attendees Welcome Agenda Item 2 Welcome / Housekeeping Apologies Agenda Item 3 Apologies 3.1 Mayor, Cr RL Chambers 3.2 Cr PW Lobegeier Declaration Agenda Item 4 Declaration of Interest Deputations Agenda Item 5 Deputations Infrastructure Agenda Item 6 Infrastructure Report 6.1 Technical Services Report 003-010 Environmental Agenda Item 7 Environmental Reports 7.1 Environmental Services Report 011-018 7.2 Formation of WBBROC Advisory Services Committee 019-021 7.3 African Lovegrass Non Declaration 022-025

7.4 Biosecurity Property Inspection Program 026-045

Confidential Agenda Item 8 Confidential Report 8.1 Confidential Report 01 General Business Agenda Item 9 General Business Closure of Meeting Agenda Item 10 Closure of Meeting

INFRA 01 - TECHNICAL SERVICES INTERNAL REPORTS 08/16

Responsible Officer: Trevor Harvey – Manager Technical Services Report prepared by: Trevor Harvey –Manager Technical Services

PART A WATER AND WASTE WATER

Reporting Period: 16/06/2016 to 15/07/2016

Water Operations:

Monthly Statistics

Water usage was close to the previous years averages in all schemes.

Water Consumption Litres/Connection/Day

Biggenden Eidsvold

Gayndah Monto

0

500

1000

1500

2000

25002012/16

2016/17

0

500

1000

1500

2000

25002012/16

2016/17

0

500

1000

1500

2000

25002012/16

2016/17

0

500

1000

1500

2000

25002012/16

2016/17

3

Mount Perry Mulgildie

Mundubbera

Water Maintenance:

General Water Meter reading for the mid year billing cycle was completed in all schemes. Biggenden Work was of routine nature during the month. Two service connection breaks were repaired. Eidsvold Work was of routine nature during the month. One main break and one service break were repaired. Civil construction for the new WTP continued. The sludge lagoons have been completed, the shed floor as been poured and erecting of the shed commenced. Off-site manufacture of the vessels is to program. The carbon filters have been completed. This project is currently on plan and budget. Gayndah Work was of routine nature during the month. Six service connection breaks were repaired. The new flocculator shell was installed in the clarifier. Monto Work was of routine nature during the month. Mount Perry Work was of routine nature during the month.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

25002012/16

2016/17

0

500

1000

1500

2000

25002012/16

2016/17

0

500

1000

1500

2000

25002012/16

2016/17

4

Mundubbera Work was of routine nature during the month. Seven service connection breaks were repaired.

Mulgildie

Mulgildie Artesian Bore Production Mulgildie Artesian Bore Level & Pressure

Bore production characteristics remained stable during the month. A minor improvement was noted when a positive pressure (2kPa) was recorded at the bore cap while the bore pump was operating. This parameter appears as the “Residual Pressure” on the right hand graph above. The standing bore pressure still remains less than 60% of the base line data measured in 2011. Work was of routine nature during the month. One service break was repaired Waste Water Maintenance General Nil. Biggenden Work was of routine nature during the month. Eidsvold Work was of routine nature during the month. Gayndah Work was of routine nature during the month. Monto Work was of routine nature during the month. Mundubbera Work was of routine nature during the month. One reportable sewer overflow occurred. This was a minor overflow that was contained.

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

30

/11

/20

11

23

/4/2

01

2

4/9

/20

12

13

/11

/20

12

23

/1/2

01

3

13

/3/2

01

3

23

/4/2

01

3

26

/11

/20

13

15

/4/2

01

4

22

/8/2

01

4

16

/12

/20

14

7/5

/20

15

10

/8/2

01

5

1/4

/20

16

Flow (l/s)Pressure (kPa/100)

0

2

4

6

8

10

2/5/2013 2/5/2014 2/5/2015 2/5/2016

Standing WaterLevel

Pumping WaterLevel

5

PART B BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES Reporting Period: 20/06/2016 – 19/07/2016 Maintenance

As of 19 July 2016, there are 87 open tasks to be actioned. Approximately 88 tasks have been received this month. During the month approximately 51 task requests were completed.

CONSTRUCTION Works in Progress Council Facilities – Lock standardisation

Tender is currently being prepared for the supply and installation of SALTO locks and infrastructure on the Council’s Administration offices, Depots and Waste Facilities.

Monto Hall – External repaint

Quotes are currently being obtained for the external repaint of the Hall.

Monto Memorial Park – Disabled toilet

Quotes are being sought for a disabled toilet kit building. Once these quotes are received, quotes will be sought for the construction of the toilet.

Mundubbera Admin Office – Front counter alteration

Plans are being drawn up as a result of consultation with staff to refurbish the customer service area and make it more user friendly for both staff and customers.

Mundubbera Swimming Pool – repainting of pool

Quotes have been received for this project. Currently awaiting leak detection to be performed in late July 2016.

Gayndah Sportsground – Netball Courts (Community funded project)

Quotes have been received for concrete pad for netball courts. Project will be awarded after consultation with Gayndah Junior Netball Association.

The Facilities team is looking forward to the new projects contained in the 2016/17

Capital Plan.

6

Part C Asset Management Report

Reporting Period: 20/06/2016 – 19/07/2016 RMPC

RMPC inspections for the 2016-17 contract are now performed within the assets team. Inspections have commenced with defects and work orders now being managed through Reflect (Asset Edge). The use of Reflect has enabled us to streamline the defect/inspection process and capture the required information to fulfil our responsibilities under the RMPC contract. These responsibilities include defect intervention and response times as well as perform risk assessments which we can now complete within the field.

The transfer of the existing defect register from AMMS to Reflect has not been as tidy as we had hoped resulting in a full verification process to be completed as part of our routine inspections.

Future success of the RMPC implementation will allow us to develop a Council defect register that will also enable works planning and risk management to be improved on our local road network. A basic defect model has been acquired which now enables us to apply our preferred/adopted intervention standards into the model.

Additional trials are underway using mobile signage software to assist Council in monitoring and recording temporary roadworks signage. A trial of Signum (Asset Edge) and Asignit are being completed with feedback from field staff to be provided at a later date.

Assetic

Minor maintenance has been performed with purchased assets and new assets being recognised within the relevant classes.

These include:

Local Disaster Coordination Building and Refuelling Facility Fuso Job Truck Field Quip Slasher Toro Mower Volvo Water Truck John Deere Grader

GIS

General maintenance has been performed with a focus on School Bus Routes. Other updates include the DCDB and the inclusion of rural addressing spatial information captured throughout the region

Data Collection

Bitumen seal inspections have been completed with the focus now on RMPC inspections and the collection of kerb and footpath condition information to provide to the works department.

7

Two Way Repeaters/Communication

With technology available within the new digital radio infrastructure, the installation of two repeater sites at Monto has been reduced to one site. Coverage of the Monto region will now be provided from Cania View (Monto), Mt Perry Mountain (Mount Perry) and Quaggy Mountain (Eidsvold).

Pricing has been received for the installation of Quaggy Mountain and Cania View with timing of installation dependant on procurement.

TV Towers

Issues that require attention include upgrading the remote telemetry units ($4500 each) at Bancroft and Cania View to 3G capable units as a result of Telstra turning off the GSM network as well as replacing ageing antennas and coax cable to improve service reliability.

Further more, a request has been forwarded to N-Com and Satellite Television & Radio Australia to provide quotes to perform routine maintenance for the next 2 year period. This process is to ensure we are receiving value for money during maintenance and to meet our purchasing requirements.

An additional request has been made to Satellite Television & Radio Australia to update the site report documents previously completed to assist in identifying additional ways of improving the service reliability at all three locations. Further information including a components list for financial valuation purposes is also proposed. The site visit to enable the report to be updated has been performed on Thursday 21st and Friday 22nd July 2016.

Plant Procurement

Deliveries

1x John Deere 770G Grader

Orders

1x Cat 428F Backhoe

Tender documents are being finalised to replace Councillor vehicles as per the plant replacement proposal.

Disposals

No items of plant are currently planned to be sold.

8

CAPITAL BUDGET 2015/2016

Capital Projects

Bu

dg

et

Co

mm

itte

d

Exp

en

dit

ure

% C

om

ple

te

Water Infrastructure 2,909,025 2,539,119

Biggenden Raw Water Pump Switchboard replacement

45,000 44,288 100%

Eidsvold WTP replacement (yr 1 of 2) 2,100,000 1,804,057 35%

Gayndah Clarifier Refurbishment 75,000 58,746 100%

Gayndah Containerised HCl Dosing Facility 99,000 105,000 100%

Gayndah North pressure supplementation (design)30,000 18,155 100%

Gayndah Supernatant sludge separator 100,000 88,594 100%

Regional Meter, Hydrant, Connections & Mains 373,025 349,960 100%

Regional Statutory System upgrade for DWQMP 57,000 40,486 100%

Mulgildie WTP cooling tower replacement 30,000 29,833 100%

Sewerage Infrastructure 441,000 455,881

Gayndah Rising Main Replacement - Oakey Creek180,328 180,575 100%

Gayndah STP No2 lagoon modification (yr 1 of 2) 100,000 114,606 100%

Regional Sewerage main & manhole replacements160,672 160,700 100%

Buildings & Other Structures 945,600 892,884

Biggenden Aged Facility Drainage Repair 15,000 5,890 100%

Amenities Lions Park Monto refurbish 95,000 90,785 95%

Amenities Beiers Park Demolish 10,000 3,544 100%

Biggenden Caravan Park Caretakers cabin refurb 11,000 9,480 100%

Council Facilities lock standardisation (yr 1 of 3) 70,000 70,870 55%

Monto hall repair internal water damage 38,000 51,272 100% Balanced under Q3 adjustment

Eidsvold Hall Kitchen upgrade 55,000 52,889 100%

Gayndah Hall Windows & Floor 30,000 17,431 100%

Mt Perry Hall Stumps 10,000 4,655 100%

Council Housing 5 yr plan repairs 90,000 87,430 100%

Monto Memorial park side fence replacement 10,000 15,740 100% Balanced under Q3 adjustment

Kenny Russell Memorial Bronzing 0 RADF Project overseen by Communities

Regional Playground Upgrades 60,000 51,253 100%

Rubbish Bin Covers (2 per town) 0 0% Removed from Budget at Q2

Eidsvold SES Shed fitout 50,000 47,056 100%

Eidsvold Cricket Building enclosure 15,600 8,000 100%

Signage - Paradise Dam & Mingo Crossing 0 0% Unknown project - Melinda Jones?

Biggenden sportground grandstand repair 25,000 24,500 100%

Swimming Pool Biggenden changeroom upgrade 170,000 121,440 100% Balanced under Q3 adjustment

Swimming Pool Mundubbera Filter replacement 165,000 214,243 100% Balanced under Q3 adjustment

Plant 1,400,000 1,396,142

Cars, Utes, Yellow Plant and appliances 1,200,000 1,598,063 100%

Sale of Plant -404,065 100%

Digital radio vehicle communications system including towers (Yr 1 of 3) 200,000 202,144 100%

JUN

E

JULY

AU

GU

ST

SEP

TEM

BER

OC

TOB

ER

NO

VEM

BER

DEC

EMB

ER

JAN

UA

RY

FEB

RU

AR

Y

MA

RC

H

AP

RIL

MA

Y

9

CAPITAL BUDGET 2016/2017

Capital Projects

Bu

dg

et

Co

mm

itte

d

Exp

en

dit

ure

% C

om

ple

te

Water Infrastructure 2,820,000 1,824,682

Biggenden Clarifier Replacement Stage 1 50,000

Biggenden Water Tower Piping & Valve Replacement

65,000

Eidsvold WTP replacement (yr 2 of 2) 2,100,000 1,824,682 40%

Eidsvold Rising Main Replacement Design 15,000

Gayndah Reservoir Roof Replacement 230,000

Regional Mains Replacement 300,000

Regional Valve & Hydrant Replacements 60,000

Sewerage Infrastructure 623,415 11,200

Gayndah STP Upgrade (yr 2 of 2) 408,415 11,200 30%

Mundubbera Sewerage Screen 35,000

Regional Sewer main relining program 180,000

Buildings & Other Structures 1,216,420 -

Biggenden Hall install shower 37,000

Biggenden Office Internal Painting 20,000

Biggenden Social Housing reseal shower bases in 4 units

25,000

Biggenden Washdown Bay Engineering 50,000

Christmas Decorations 29,000

Council Housing major repair items 60,000

Eidsvold Admin back-up generator 8,120

Gayndah Aerodrome Beacon Lights Replacement 80,000

Gayndah Hall install large fans 34,000

Gayndah netball court earthworks 10,000

Mayrol Grant Items 2015-16 20,000

Monto Admin back-up generator 19,800

Monto Hall External Painting 50,000

Monto main street tree planter boxes 10,000

Monto Memorial Park instal new toilet 45,000

Monto Sportsground building floor covering replacement

35,000

Mount Perry Depot Diesel Tank Replacement 50,000

Mundubbera Administration Counter Renewal 32,200

Mundubbera Hall audio upgrade 55,000

Mundubbera Hall Install large fans 34,000

Mundubbera Hall instal new lights 22,300

Regional Amenities Upgrade 90,000

Regional Lock Standardisation (yr 2 of 3) 90,000

Regional Playground equipment upgrades 60,000

Signage Paradise Dam & Mingo Crossing 10,000

Swimming Pool upgrades 240,000

Plant 1,200,000 240,323

Cars, Utes, Yellow Plant and appliances 1,381,000 320,000 30%

Sale of Plant 381,000- -79,677 20%

Digital radio vehicle communications system including towers (Yr 2 of 3) 200,000

JUN

E

JULY

AU

GU

ST

SEP

TEM

BER

OC

TOB

ER

NO

VEM

BER

DEC

EMB

ER

JAN

UA

RY

FEB

RU

AR

Y

MA

RC

H

AP

RIL

MA

Y

10

ENVIR 01

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES REPORTS 08.2016

Responsible Officer: Mike Moller – Acting Manager Environmental Services Report prepared by: Katrina Cekanauskas – Administrative Assistant

1 PURPOSE OF REPORT The purpose of this report is to provide Council with information in relation to reported activities carried out particularly in the areas of Environmental Health, Trade Waste, Vermin and Vector Control, Waste Management/Collection and Natural Resource Management. 2 INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND The attached reports detail statistical information for the months of June and July 2016 in the areas of Food Business, Vector Management, Waste Management Services, Wandering Livestock and Pest and Weed Management. 3 CORPORATE/OPERATIONAL PLAN

In accordance with outcome 4 Increasing the quality of water, land, air and the extent of biodiversity in the region. With particular relevance to sections 4.1 Pest Management, 4.2. Stock Routes, 4.3 Waste Management, 4.4 Environmental Health and 4.6 Natural Resource Management. 4 POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Not applicable. 5 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS

Environmental Protection Act 1994, Food Act 2006, Waste Reduction and Recycling Act 2011,Public Health Act 2005, Biosecurity Act 2014 and Land Protection (Pest and Stock Route Management) Act 2002.

6 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Not applicable. 7 RISK MANAGEMENT Not applicable. 8 CONSULTATION Reports have been prepared in conjunction with relevant staff.

11

9 OPTIONS FOR COUNCIL TO CONSIDER

For Councillors information only. 10 OFFICER’S COMMENTS/CONCLUSION For Council’s consideration. 11 ATTACHMENTS For the months of June and July 2016.

Environmental Health Monthly Summary Report

Natural Resources Management Report

12

of 3

Environmental Health Monthly Summary Report

1.1 Food Business Inspections Compliant - JUNE

New Food Business 1

Re-inspection 0

Number of complaint inspections 2

Request for Search 0

Our Cadet EHO undertook an investigation on behalf of Queensland Health in regards to a suspected food poisoning outbreak. The result of the investigation showed there was a Norovirus outbreak in the region. Information about the virus was put on Council’s Facebook page and website.

1.2 Application Assessments - JUNE

New Application – Mobile Food Business 0

New Application – Temporary Food Business 0

New Application Fixed 0

Amendment 1

Annual Review – Food Business 0

Food Safety Programs 2

Council received two food safety programs in the month of June. Council organised for written advice to be completed by an external contractor for both programs and Council’s Cadet EHO then accredited the programs. 72 Food Business Licence Renewals were processed for the month of June.

2.0 Public / Community Events - Food Notifications

Month Number of notifications

JUNE 2016 11

Council’s Environmental Health Department held two Food Hygiene Courses for Community Groups. The aim of these courses was to provide participants with food hygiene skills and knowledge that satisfies the requirements of the FSANZ: Food Standards Code. There was a session held in the morning (26 people) and also in the evening (13 people). The course was advertised via the newspaper, Facebook page and website.

13

of 3

3.0 Local Government Weekly Notifiable Disease Report for North Burnett.

2016 JUNE

Gayndah Biggenden Eidsvold Monto Mundubbera

Mount Perry

Campylobacter Enteritis 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ross River Virus 1 0 0 0 0 0

Salmonella Specified 0 0 0 0 0 0

Salmonellosis Unspecified 2 1 0 0 0 0

Cryptosporidiosis 0 0 0 0 0 0

4.0 Vector Management

A limited number of mosquitoes during winter. Environmental Services will continue to monitor on a monthly basis during this time.

5.0 Waste Management Services for June 2016

5.1 Kerbside Collection Units - June

Domestic 14840

Additional Services 25

Infirmed 145

Commercial and School 5304

Litter Service 910

Not for profit 610

Events 95

Total Services 21929

Illegal Dumping Number of Tasks

3

14

of 3

6.0 Waste Education Activities

Environmental Services are in the process of applying for the Keep Australia Beautiful Beverage Container Recycling Program. This application aims to give Council’s recycling areas at the Waste Management Facilities a facelift and promote recycling throughout the towns. Council will be participating in Asbestos Awareness Month. A media campaign will be launched. All media schedules have been sent to the Media Officer. A report is to go to Council with regards to Council’s participation in the Garage Sale Trail.

7.0 Community Event Package

The Community Event Package has been presented to a Council Meeting with further amendments to be made. Graphics are to be finalised for the community event package.

8.0 Environmental Compliance

No inspections undertaken

Environment Tasks Number

Dust 0

Odour 3

Noise 4

Water Testing Number of Tasks

Residential 3

15

of 3 Doc Id 764335

Natural Resource Management Report

17th June to 22nd July 2016

Contents

Pest Survey / “Surveillance Program” ................................................................................................. 1

Biosecurity Act (2014) ......................................................................................................................... 1

Wild Dog / Dingo Management .......................................................................................................... 2

Flying-fox Management and Monitoring ............................................................................................ 2

Department of Transport and Mains Roads ....................................................................................... 2

Other projects and grant funding ....................................................................................................... 2

Forward List of Work for Q1 2016/17 ................................................................................................. 2

Customer Service Requests for calendar year to date ....................................................................... 3

Pest Survey / “Surveillance Program” The current rotation of properties for the Pest Survey Program has now expired. The program operated well with many property owners assisting with the inspections. Courtesy Letters have been forwarded to property owners to thank them for their co operation and to advise if any declared plants and animals were found. A new property inspection “Surveillance Program” that operates under the Biosecurity Act (2014) is now required to be approved by Council. A procedure for Biosecurity Programs, including Surveillance Programs is currently before Council for consideration. The minimum legal requirement for advertising any approved Surveillance Program is publishing on Council’s website with a 14 day notice period prior to commencement. Biosecurity Act (2014) All NRM Team personnel have completed training, assessments and been issued with Letters of Appointment (with associated ID/Authorisation Cards) as “Authorised Persons” under the Biosecurity Act (2014). A greater regional Wide Bay/Burnett Biosecurity Plan is being developed, which is intended overarch the Biosecurity Plan developed/approved for the North Burnett. The greater regional plan is expected to be finalised by the end of 2016. Presently NBRC does not have a current Biosecurity Plan in place for the region. Under the Biosecurity Act (2014) NBRC will assume more authority and responsibility in the management of “biosecurity risks” across the North Burnett region, including being the primary administrator of the legislation for the region. (“Biosecurity risks” refers to the management of “Biosecurity Matter” - formerly commonly referred to as “declared pests”, but under the act includes substantially more potential “risks”).

16

of 3 Doc Id 764335

Wild Dog / Dingo Management A Report to Council containing information and management options has been presented and adopted by Council in the July Meeting. Wild / Dog Dingo Scalp Bounties will remain at $20 each for the time being with a view to phasing out the payment of Bounties in the time ahead. Available resources will be redirected and concentrated into more effectively targeting problematic animals where issues can be substantiated. Flying-fox Management and Monitoring A Report to Council containing information and management options has been presented for consideration. Presently the Oakey Creek Flying Fox Roost is unoccupied. (0 Flying Foxes) Department of Transport and Mains Roads Funding is currently been sought through the Department of Transport and Mains Roads (TMR). The following opportunities are being considered by TMR:

2016/17 Element 5 – Declared Weed Management along Mains Roads Contract

the control of declared pests not already managed under existing/previous contracted works within mains roads easements

mapping of declared pests using technology such as IPad’s/Smartphones and associated applications/software.

TMR have now accepted and finalised contractual arrangements with NBRC regarding its tender proposal for the 2016/17 Element 5 program. This new contract will be fixed price, payable as progress instalments for a defined list of declared pest species along road easements that are the responsibility of TMR. Other projects and grant funding There are presently no other NRM projects or grant funding, other than the Humphrey Binjour Vegetation Offset Project, which is ongoing. All available plants associated with this project are now established within the vegetation offset site with the project now focusing more upon maintenance/risk management and monitoring. The project has thus far achieved a high survival rate amongst the transplanted plants. Forward List of Work for Q1 2016/17 1. Complete any outstanding Property inspections under the Pest Survey Program –

Declared Plants and Animals 2. Clean road inspections throughout the North Burnett Region 3. Inspections and treatment of declared weeds on Council roads 4. Inspections and treatment of declared weeds on State roads 5. Vector Management inspections and dipping 6. Stock route grazing / travel permits 7. Wandering livestock responses 8. Fortnightly / monthly inspections of public and depot wash down facilities 9. Rubber Vine inspections on creek lines

17

of 3 Doc Id 764335

10. Negotiations to secure future funding opportunities for NRM projects/initiatives 11. Procedure and policy development –

a. Biosecurity Plan / Program b. Surveillance Program Property Inspection Policy / Procedure c. Pre Purchase Property Inspections Policy d. Stock Route Grazing / Travelling Policy e. Feral Cat Management Policy

12. Standardisation of NBRC’s LPO vehicles in terms of signage and safety equipment 13. Introduction of blood toxicity testing program for LPO’s 14. Updating and improved utilisation of NBRC website for advertising/publishing NRM

functions/initiatives. Customer Service Requests for calendar year to date

Type of Request Year to Date Total July 2016 Total

Wandering Livestock reports 48 6

Declared Pest Reports a. Council responsible locations b. Community guidance/assistance requests c. Baiting Enquiries d. Equipment Hire

2

20 44 31

0 0 2 4

Approval to Burn 11 4

Stock Route Grazing/Travel Permits 9 2

Other 13 8

18

EENNVVIIRR 0022

FFOORRMMAATTIIOONN OOFF WWBBBBRROOCC BBIIOOSSEECCUURRIITTYY AADDVVIISSOORRYY

CCOOMMMMIITTTTEEEE

Responsible Officer: Brendan Pearce, General Manager Engineering and

Environmental Services Mike Moller, Acting Manager Environmental Services Report prepared by: Mike Moller, Acting Manager Environmental Services

1 PURPOSE OF REPORT To inform Council that the Wide Bay Burnett Pest Management Group is recommending to WBBROC that it become a Biosecurity Advisory Committee formed under the auspices of WBBROC, to advise WBBROC on the development and implementation of a Regional Biosecurity Strategy and related regional biosecurity and pest management issues. 2 INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND The Wide Bay Burnett Pest Management Group is comprised of pest management staff from Bundaberg, Fraser Coast, North Burnett, South Burnett, Cherbourg and Gympie Regional Council areas and has been meeting bi-monthly for several years. At a meeting on 15 July 2016 in Gympie, the Group endorsed the development of a Wide Bay Burnett Regional Biosecurity Strategy, as a collaborative regional approach to the management of invasive plants and animals which provides benefits on a range of levels:

- A regional biosecurity strategy will ensure that invasive plant and animal management can be addressed in a more efficient and effective manner, in line with catchment management principles.

- A consistent approach to determining the biosecurity risk posed by invasive plants and animals by all local governments will ensure a more comparative basis can be applied to control and enforcement outcomes.

- Industry stakeholders will benefit from having a streamlined document for the whole of the Wide Bay Burnett region, with a consistent look and feel for each local government area regarding specific local priorities for pest species (e.g. DTMR Element 5 funding).

- A regional biosecurity strategy will identify opportunities for coordinated action and cost sharing leading to more efficient and effective control.

- The development of a regional biosecurity strategy may drive the ability to attract external funds for regional projects.

- A collaborative approach to planning by all local governments involved will increase efficiencies and the cost effectiveness of individual Council Biosecurity Plans.

19

- Consistency in data collection and mapping will result in a more strategic approach to pest management across the region, and to inform project decision making and reporting.

The Group also discussed a number of benefits for the Group and Councils by working under the umbrella of WBBROC:

- High level endorsement of recommendations coming from the Group. - Keeping pest management and biosecurity issues in front of Mayors,

Deputy Mayors and CEOs. - The ability for WBBROC to take issues to Ministers when necessary. - Regional support is often necessary to attract Government funding. - Administrative and coordination support from WBBROC. - Quarterly reporting on the Committee’s activities to WBBROC.

At the meeting the Group recommended that:

- A Biosecurity Advisory Committee be formed under the auspices of WBBROC to advise WBBROC on the development and implementation of the Regional Biosecurity Strategy and related regional biosecurity and pest management issues.

- The Biosecurity Advisory Committee forms a sub-group to develop a Terms of Reference for WBBROC approval.

- The membership of the WBBROC Biosecurity Advisory Committee include nominated pest management staff from each of the participating Local Governments, plus representatives from other groups/agencies, with the ability to invite observers from other key stakeholder organisations on an “as-needed” basis.

- The Group forward these recommendations to WBBROC for consideration at its meeting on 25 August 2016.

3 CORPORATE/OPERATIONAL PLAN 4.1.2 Maintain and expand control measures for feral animals and weeds. 4 POLICY IMPLICATIONS A collaborative regional approach to the management of invasive plants and animals provides policy benefits on a range of levels, as mentioned previously. 5 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS Under the Biosecurity Act 2014 (the Act) which came into force on 1 July 2016, everyone has a general biosecurity obligation to take reasonable and practical steps to minimise the risks associated with invasive plants and animals under their control. Under the Act NBRC must develop a Biosecurity Plan. 6 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

20

Council may be asked to contribute approximately $3000 towards the cost of developing a Regional Biosecurity Strategy. 7 RISK MANAGEMENT There are no known additional risks associated with matters mentioned in this report. 8 CONSULTATION No consultation has occurred outside Council regarding the contents of this report, other than within the Pest Management Group. 9 OPTIONS FOR COUNCIL TO CONSIDER Options to consider:

a.) Adopt the report as received for the information it contains, and support the formation of the Biosecurity Advisory Committee under the auspices of WBBROC.

b.) Not accept the report and not support the formation of the Biosecurity Advisory Committee under the auspices of WBBROC.

c.) Take no action. 10 OFFICER’S COMMENTS/CONCLUSION Nil. 11 ATTACHMENTS Nil. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the report be adopted as received, and that Council support the formation of the Biosecurity Advisory Committee under the auspices of WBBROC.

21

EENNVVIIRR 0033

AAFFRRIICCAANN LLOOVVEEGGRRAASSSS NNOONN DDEECCLLAARRAATTIIOONN

Responsible Officer: Brendan Pearce, General Manager Engineering and

Environmental Services Mike Moller, Acting Manager Environmental Services Report prepared by: Mike Moller, Acting Manager Environmental Services

1 PURPOSE OF REPORT To inform Council that African Lovegrass (ALG) is yet to be officially declared as a local pest in the NBRC area (due to non publication of the declaration) and for Council to consider if it wants to publish the declaration and continue to control ALG in the NBRC area. 2 INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND On 6 December 2011 Council approved by resolution Local Law No. 3 (Community and Environmental Management) 2011 (LL no 3). Division 2 of LL no 3, Declaration of local pests, Section 6 states: 6 Declaration of local pests

(l) The local government may, by subordinate local law, declare an animal or plant of a specified species to be a local pest. (2) Before the local government makes a declaration under this section, it must consult with the chief executive* about the desirability of the declaration. (3) A declaration under this section--

(a) must be published in a newspaper circulating generally in the local government's area; and

(b) comes into force on the date of publication.

(4) In this section-

chief executive means the chief executive of the state government

department in which the Land Protection (Pest and Stock Route Management) Act 2002 is administered.

On 6 December 2011 Council also approved by resolution Subordinate Local Law No. 3 (Community and Environmental Management) 2011 (Sub LL no 3). Part 2 of Sub LL no 3, Declared local pests, Section 5 states:

22

5 Declaration of local pests—Authorising local law, s 6(1) (1) For section 6(1) of the authorising local law, the animal or plant prescribed in column 2 of schedule 1 is a declared pest in the corresponding part of the local government's area mentioned in column 1 of schedule 1. (2) A declaration of a pest under subsection (1) does not come into force until the date of publication of the declaration under section 6(3) of the authorising local law. Schedule 1 Declared local pests

Column 1 Column 2 Applicable part of local Declared local pest government's area Entire local government area African lovegrass (Eragrostis curvula) There is no record of NBRC having consulted with the chief executive about the desirability of the declaration as per 6(2) of LL no 3. Furthermore, as the declaration has never been published in a local newspaper as per 6(3) of LL no 3, the declaration has yet to come into force, as per 5(2) of Sub LL no 3. 3 CORPORATE/OPERATIONAL PLAN 4.1.2 Maintain and expand control measures for feral animals and weeds. 4 POLICY IMPLICATIONS ALG is mentioned as a local species to be controlled under the NBRC Pest Management Plan. This plan expired on 19 April 2015 and is no longer current. No other Queensland local government has declared ALG as a pest under its local laws. 5 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS ALG is not a prohibited or restricted invasive plant under the Biosecurity Act 2014 (the Act) which came into force on 1 July 2016. However, by law, everyone has a general biosecurity obligation to take reasonable and practical steps to minimise the risks associated with invasive plants and animals under their control. Under the Act NBRC must develop a Biosecurity Plan which may or may not mention control of ALG. 6 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Council has spent $27,779.07 controlling ALG on its own road network over the past two financial years. Additionally $46,564.03 has been spent on controlling ALG on the state road network in the NBRC area over the past two financial years, under the Element 5 contract with DTMR (~ 25% of funds and

23

a substantial proportion of some LPO’s Element 5 time, as there are very few other invasive plant species on the relevant state road network). Not controlling ALG in the NBRC area would allow these funds to be used to control other higher priority weeds (such as GRT and Parthenium) and to undertake increased property inspections for restricted invasive plants under the Act. 7 RISK MANAGEMENT There is a risk that not formally declaring ALG as a pest via the publication of the declaration in a local newspaper and ceasing to control ALG in the NBRC area, may result in DTMR reducing the amount of available funding under the current 2016-17 Element 5 contract. Control of ALG was specified in the scope of works provided by NBRC to DTMR for the current Element 5 contract (along with a number of other weeds), however the contract does not specify the amount of funding to be expended on each weed. Total funding provided by TMR under the 2016-17 Element 5 contract is $73,800. 8 CONSULTATION No consultation has occurred outside Council regarding the contents of this report. 9 OPTIONS FOR COUNCIL TO CONSIDER Options to consider:

a.) Adopt the report as received for the information it contains. b.) Not accept the report. c.) Formalise the declaration of ALG as a declared pest as per LL no 3

and Sub LL no 3 via publication of the declaration in a local newspaper and continue to control ALG on the NRBC and state road networks at current levels of funding.

d.) Not formalise the declaration but continue to control ALG on the NRBC and state road networks at current or reduced levels of funding.

e.) Not formalise the declaration and cease controlling ALG on the NRBC and state road networks with a reallocation of funding to higher priority weeds and activities.

f.) Take no action. 10 OFFICER’S COMMENTS/CONCLUSION Adoption of option (e) may require renegotiation of the 2016-17 Element 5 contract with DTMR. DTMR may consider that NBRC spraying Grader Grass is a higher priority instead, as this species has been spread via DTMR activities (though it is not a prohibited or restricted invasive plant species under the Act).

24

11 ATTACHMENTS Nil. RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that Council:

1. adopted the report as received, and 2. that Council not formalise the declaration and cease controlling

ALG on the NRBC and state road networks with a reallocation of funding to higher priority weeds and activities.

25

EENNVVIIRR 0044

NNBBRRCC BBIIOOSSEECCUURRIITTYY ((PPRROOPPEERRTTYY IINNSSPPEECCTTIIOONNSS)) PPRROOGGRRAAMM

DDRRAAFFTT PPOOLLIICCYY && PPRROOCCEEDDUURREE

Responsible Officers: Brendan Pearce, General Manager Engineering and

Environmental Services Mike Moller, Acting Manager Environmental Services Report prepared by: Tom Hayes, Natural Resource Management Officer

1 PURPOSE OF REPORT To inform and seek Council endorsement of draft policy and procedure associated with the management of biosecurity surveillance and prevention and control programs (formerly pest survey property inspections) across the North Burnett region, prior to forwarding the draft policy and procedure to the Chief Executive of the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries (DAF) for his consideration, as per section 239 (2) of the Biosecurity Act 2014 (the Act). Once the Chief Executive has reviewed the drafts and provided comments to Council, Council will be able to formally authorise the NBRC Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program as per section 235 of the Act. 2 INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND The management of invasive (ie pest) plants and animals is the responsibility of each land owner/occupier. Under sections 23 to 28 of the Act, each land owner/occupier has a “General Biosecurity Obligation” (GBO) to take all reasonable and practical measures to prevent or minimise biosecurity risks, such as invasive plants and animals. Council’s role in the management of pests and biosecurity risks is to:

Support the community and Enforce responsibilities in relation to compliance with legislation and

NBRC’s Pest Management/Biosecurity Plan and associated programs. Presently NBRC provides the following in relation to pest and biosecurity risk management:

A Pest Management Plan (which expired 31 December 2015 and now needs to be redeveloped into a Biosecurity Plan).

Pest Survey Property Inspection Program. Education and guidance through the NRM Stream. Active management of all road easements and land that is the

responsibility of Council across the North Burnett region. Availability to complete Private Works as required/agreed. A bounty for all wild dog/dingo scalps provided in suitable condition.

26

Free 1080 meat bait injection services provided in both coordinated 1080 baiting programs and private works.

Availability of equipment for hire, including foothold traps, cage traps, pig traps and quik spray units.

With the commencement of the Act from the 1st of July 2016, NBRC needs to redevelop its current plans and programs such that it achieves compliance with the legislation and provides a structured framework under which it can operate. Fundamentally, the Act provides local government with more autonomy and authority in relation to the management of biosecurity risks within its region. This also means there is increased responsibility and resourcing requirements for local government (including NBRC) to maintain compliance with the legislation. The attached draft policy and procedure aims to create the structured framework for the property inspection/surveillance program, under which it can operate in order to enforce land owner/occupier responsibilities. As the attached draft policy and procedure form the basis of Biosecurity Programs (Surveillance and Prevention and Control) as defined under sections 232 to 234 of the Act, Council endorsement is sought prior to forwarding the drafts to the Chief Executive of DAF, as part of the consultation requirements of section 239 (2) of the Act. Once the Chief Executive has reviewed the drafts and provided comments to Council, Council will be able to formally authorise the NBRC Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program as per section 235 of the Act. Other elements of NBRC’s services and enforcement of both the Act and NBRC’s yet to be developed Biosecurity Plan will be the subject of separate reports to Council. 3 CORPORATE/OPERATIONAL PLAN Environment 4.1 Pest Management Implementation of the Pest Management/Biosecurity Plan to ensure effective and efficient pest control.

4.1.2 Maintain and expand existing control measures for feral animals and weeds.

4.6 Natural Resource Management Protecting areas of high ecological significance. Areas managed effectively.

4.6.4 Lobby for Federal and State Government Grants with regard to NRM projects, Pest Management initiatives and strategies that protect and preserve the diversity of flora, fauna and aquatic eco systems.

27

4 POLICY IMPLICATIONS The policy drafted for Council consideration and endorsement will create a formalised, but new policy for a long standing responsibility and function carried out by Council. All other relevant NBRC policies are adhered to where applicable. 5 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS All relevant Standards and Codes are applied where required. Biosecurity Act 2014. NBRC’s Biosecurity Plan (when developed) and associated Programs. 6 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Part of the 2016/17 Operational budget. 7 RISK MANAGEMENT Council is obligated to monitor and enforce its Biosecurity Plan (when developed), associated programs and compliance with the Act. Failure to enforce land owner/occupier responsibilities will breach NBRC’s General Biosecurity Obligation and Chapter 3 (Matters relating to local governments), parts 1 and 2 of the Act. Land owners/occupiers are ultimately responsible for ensuring they appropriately manage biosecurity risks on the land they are responsible for. A structured framework of policies, procedures, risk assessments and plans are required by NBRC in order for it to be able to enforce these land owner/occupier responsibilities. The financial risks to Council relate only to those associated with operating its approved programs. Indirectly however, should Council fail to enforce compliance with the Act and its Biosecurity Plan (when developed), the increased prevalence of invasive plants and animals and loss of land productivity will increase costs to both Council and the community. 8 CONSULTATION As the attached draft policy and procedure form the basis of Biosecurity Programs (Surveillance and Prevention and Control) as defined under sections 232 to 234 of the Act, once Council endorsement is obtained the drafts will be forwarded to the Chief Executive of DAF, as part of the consultation requirements of section 239 (2) of the Act. The regional DAF Biosecurity Officer has been consulted regarding this process. Internal consultation occurs monthly through NRM Stream meetings and fortnightly meetings with the Environmental Services senior staff.

28

Internal awareness training will be required for all applicable NBRC personnel, visitors and contractors. The NBRC Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program Policy and associated Procedure will be published on NBRC’s website once they are formally authorised by Council. 9 OPTIONS FOR COUNCIL TO CONSIDER Options to consider:

a.) Endorse both the attached draft NBRC Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program Policy and associated Procedure.

b.) Endorse either the attached draft NBRC Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program Policy or associated Procedure.

c.) Recommend amendments to the attached draft policy and/or procedure.

d.) Maintain NBRC’s current informal but published Pest Survey Property Inspection Program as it is presently defined. If this program is not conducted under the Act then enforcement action will be unable to be undertaken by Council, unless specific Council by-laws are passed.

e.) Abandon conducting any future Pest Survey Property Inspection/Biosecurity Programs.

f.) Take no action. 10 OFFICER’S COMMENTS/CONCLUSION The adoption of this structured framework by Council, its publication and associated education of the public will ensure biosecurity risk management and compliance is consistent with that intended by Council for the region. The lack of a structured framework in the past has caused uncertainty, confusion and a diminished ability to enforce land owner/occupier responsibilities. Given the increased responsibility and authority of Council in administering the Act, it is essential that a more structured and Council endorsed process be utilised. 11 ATTACHMENTS

Draft NBRC Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program Policy (Doc ID: 756397)

Draft NBRC Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program Procedure (Doc ID: 756468)

29

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the report be adopted as received and that Council endorse both the attached:

Draft NBRC Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program Policy (Doc ID: 756397)

Draft NBRC Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program Procedure (Doc ID: 756468)

prior to their submission to the Chief Executive of DAF for his consideration.

30

DRAFT

C:\Users\nataliez.NORTHBURNETT\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\F02FS5EP\Pest Survey Property Inspection Policy.doc 1 of 4

Policy Title: NBRC Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program Policy

Policy No: Policy Subject: NBRC Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program Policy Directorate: Engineering and Environmental Services Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer Authorised by: North Burnett Regional Council Adopted Date: General Meeting – xxxx 2016 Review Date: Authorities: Biosecurity Act 2014

POLICY: The North Burnett Regional Council (NBRC) will assist property owners/lessees across the North Burnett to manage their legislative responsibilities in relation to invasive (ie pest) plants and animals via property inspections. Property inspections (ie surveillance) will be conducted by “authorised persons” (Land Protection Officers – LPO’s) using a combination of random, targeted/follow up, requested and reported methods of pest identification. Where invasive plants and animals are detected on land that is privately owned/managed, NBRC will attempt to work positively and constructively with the applicable land owner/lessee in managing their legal responsibilities (ie prevention and control). Management of these legal responsibilities could involve:

Immediate efforts by the land owner/lessee to prevent the spread and proliferation of identified invasive plants and animals and eradicate/control these pests on the property.

Development and application of an agreed Property Management Plan for the identified pests on the property over a nominated period of time.

The execution of works by, or on behalf of NBRC, where reasonably requested/expected actions by the landowner have been inadequate in the management of invasive animals and plants. The costs of these works shall be

General Policy

31

DRAFT


borne by the land owner and/or affixed to the land title with an appropriate interest rate for amounts unpaid.

The issuing of fees and charges against the land owner/lessee as permitted under legislation, including Penalty Infringement Notices (PINS).

Prosecution of the applicable land owner/lessee for serious breaches of legislation and/or NBRC’s Biosecurity Plan (when developed).

Unless a formal arrangement/mechanism exists between NBRC and a neighbouring/adjoining authority, invasive plants and animals will only be managed under this policy if they occur within the NBRC region. NBRC may however engage with neighbouring/adjoining authorities in the development of its Biosecurity Plan for due consideration of cross region pest management priorities. INTRODUCTION: Each land owner/lessee has a general biosecurity obligation under the Biosecurity Act 2014 (the Act) to:

prevent the introduction, spread and proliferation of invasive plants and animals;

eradicate/manage these pests on the land that they own/manage and

abide by the priorities and requirements of the local authority’s (NBRC’s) Biosecurity Plan.

Council strives to work closely with and assist the people of the North Burnett in managing their land protection/management and biosecurity responsibilities. Invasive plants and animals and their minimum management requirements are defined under the Act. The management of “Biosecurity Risks” within NBRC’s Biosecurity Plan (when developed) will also involve the definition of priorities in the management of these pests. The priority of managing biosecurity risks can be defined either through the creation of “Biosecurity Zones” or by simply managing/preventing the spread of biosecurity risks to areas where historically there has been generally low levels or none previously identified. The management of these priorities can help define whether the practical objective is to eradicate or control the pest. OBJECTIVES: The NBRC Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program has the objectives of:

Ensuring NBRC’s legal compliance as the local government authority.

Assisting land owners/lessees within the North Burnett region to meet their legal responsibilities and compliance.

Ensuring pests are appropriately managed in line with legal requirements and NBRC’s Biosecurity Plan (when developed).

Ensuring equity/fairness across all land owners/lessees whereby those that are committed to the appropriate management of pests (financially, resources, time/effort etc) are not disadvantaged on an ongoing basis by those who have not managed their responsibilities appropriately.

32

DRAFT


Cooperatively working with and assisting to educate the people of the North Burnett region regarding biosecurity/invasive pest and/or property management matters.

NBRC’s Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program Policy includes and utilises:

NBRC Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program Procedure – Doc ID 756468

Property Management Plan Letter Template – Doc ID 744071 DEFINITIONS: Authorised Person: A person who has been appointed (in writing) by NBRC’s Chief Executive Officer to perform functions under the Act within the region and is still engaged in this capacity. The functions and responsibilities of an authorised person under the legislation (s256 –Biosecurity Act 2014) include:

a.) To investigate, monitor and enforce compliance with the Act; b.) To investigate or monitor whether an occasion has arisen for the

exercise of powers under the Act; c.) To facilitate the exercise of powers under the Act; and d.) To help achieve the purposes of the Act by providing advice and

information on how the purposes may be achieved. Constructively: An effort to provide understanding and guidance in a positive manner that promotes and provides the land owner/lessee with a reasonable opportunity to correct any deficiencies or non-conformances. Invasive Plant/Animal: (a) means a species of plant or animal that has, or is likely to have, an adverse impact on a biosecurity consideration because of the introduction, spread or increase in population size of the species in an area; and (b) includes a plant or animal species that is prohibited matter or restricted matter. The Act lists prohibited and restricted invasive plants and animals that are the responsibility of local government (Schedule 1 parts 3 and 4 and Schedule 2 part 2). Locally significant invasive species will be listed within NBRC’s Biosecurity Plan when it is developed. Biosecurity Plan: A legally required plan that a local government must have for the management of invasive species for its local government area (s53 – Biosecurity Act 2014). The plan may include provision for each of the following— (a) achievable objectives under the plan; (b) strategies, activities and responsibilities for achieving the objectives; (c) strategies to inform the local community about the content of the plan and achievement of its objectives; (d) monitoring implementation of the plan and evaluating its effectiveness; (e) other matters the local government considers appropriate for management of invasive biosecurity matter for its local government area.

33

DRAFT


Property Management Plan: A NBRC specific, non-legally required management plan document/agreement that aims to constructively work with land owners/lessees with identified pest infestations/issues over a nominated period of time. The document defines agreed measures to be taken by the land owner/lessee over the nominated period of time to achieve an appropriate level of compliance with legal requirements and NBRC’s Biosecurity Plan. This document commits the land owner/lessee to the appropriate allocation of resources, time/effort and activities in order to achieve the required outcome. Failure to achieve/comply with the Property Management Plan could attract subsequent corrective actions by NBRC, as per the NBRC Biosecurity (Property Inspection) Program Procedure (Doc ID 756468). Reasonable: Something a person knows/ought to know or have completed given their position, experience, activities, resources and responsibilities. It is a reasonable expectation that a land owner/lessee should be aware of appropriate land management techniques and responsibilities, including the need to manage invasive plants and animals. General Biosecurity Obligation: Requires everyone to manage biosecurity risks under their control and take all reasonable and practical measures to minimise the likelihood of causing a biosecurity risk and minimise the adverse effects of dealing with a biosecurity matter or carrier (s23 – Biosecurity Act 2014).

34

DRAFT

C:\Users\nataliez.NORTHBURNETT\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\F02FS5EP\Pest Survey Property Inspection Procedure.doc 1 of 9

Procedure Title: Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program Procedure

Policy No: Policy Subject: Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program Procedure Directorate: Engineering and Environmental Services Responsible Officer: Chief Executive Officer Authorised by: North Burnett Regional Council Adopted Date: General Meeting – xxxx 2016 Review Date: Authorities: Biosecurity Act 2014

OBJECTIVE: To implement the Biosecurity (Property Inspections) Program Policy. INTRODUCTION: Each land owner/lessee has a general biosecurity obligation under the Biosecurity Act 2014 (the Act) to:

prevent the introduction, spread and proliferation of invasive plants and animals;

eradicate/manage these pests on the land that they own/manage and

abide by the priorities and requirements of the local authority’s (NBRC’s) Biosecurity Plan (when developed).

PROCEDURE:

1.) In order to ensure NBRC’s compliance with the Act, NBRC will operate a Biosecurity (Property Inspection) Program, which under sections 232 to 234 of the Act could be: (a) a surveillance program and/or (b) a prevention and control program

Customer Service Procedure

35

DRAFT


2.) NBRC’s surveillance program will involve inspections of properties selected through a range of mechanisms including:

a. Random selection within a scheduled inspection/surveillance program. b. Requested by the land owner or occupier as part of NBRC providing

constructive guidance/support to persons within the region. c. Reported by persons within the region concerned about potential

biosecurity issues within the region and/or the effectiveness of other land owners/lessees in managing their general biosecurity obligations and compliance with NBRC’s Pest Management/Biosecurity Plan.

d. Targeted by NBRC’s authorised persons as part of follow up surveillance monitoring for properties previously identified as having/reasonably suspected of having invasive species.

3.) NBRC’s prevention and control program will involve property inspections and as required remedial actions where land owners/lessees have been ineffective in carrying out their general biosecurity obligations and/or maintaining compliance with NBRC’s Biosecurity Plan (when developed). NBRC will attempt to engage with land owners/lessees in a constructive manner and provide both opportunity and guidance for the responsible person/s to address the invasive species issue(s). Where the responsible person/s cannot effectively address the identified invasive species issue(s) within an appropriate time period, the responsible person may be required to commit to the implementation of an agreed Property Management Plan. The Property Management Plan will define a course of action agreed with NBRC, which will allocate priorities, resources, actions, locations and time frames for compliance with the responsible person’s general biosecurity obligations and NBRC’s Biosecurity Plan (when developed). Where the responsible person’s response has been inadequate and/or ineffective, NBRC will seek to resolve the matter via:

o Correspondence between NBRC and the responsible person/s; o Fines, fees and charges; o Completion of prevention and control activities chargeable to the

responsible person/s as prescribed through legislation, including charging interest for unpaid amounts and/or

o Prosecution.

4.) The random selection of properties as part of a scheduled inspection/surveillance program will be completed by a person within NBRC who is removed from the day to day interactions with members of the public involving biosecurity/pest management issues.

5.) The methodology used for the random selection of properties shall be:

36

DRAFT


a. Privately owned or managed property within the North Burnett region. b. Preference for properties adjoining or associated with drainage lines

and/or watercourses. c. The selection of an appropriate number of properties within each

shire/parish/area across the North Burnett region. d. The selection process shall utilise either:

i. a map defining property boundaries across the region and other relevant aspects including drainage lines/water courses, townships, roads etc or

ii. the random selection of properties from a list/database of properties for the North Burnett region using LotPlan or other identification details where property ownership/management is not identified during the selection process.

e. Properties that have already been inspected during the current biosecurity program period shall be excluded from re-selection.

6.) Randomly selected properties across the region shall be listed for inspection/surveillance by authorised persons (LPO’s) during the corresponding time period.

7.) Property Inspection forms containing details of the property and responsible persons shall be printed and issued to the authorised person/s (LPO’s) assigned to complete the inspection/surveillance.

8.) Scheduled randomly selected property inspections/surveillance shall be nominally issued to the authorised person/s (LPO’s) operating within that area of the North Burnett region.

9.) Both the authorised person/s (LPO’s) and responsible persons associated with the land scheduled for inspection/surveillance have the right to request that an alternative authorised person/s (LPO’s) conduct the inspection/surveillance for a particular property.

10.) Should either the nominally issued authorised person/s, or the applicable responsible person for a particular property request that an alternative authorised person conduct the inspection/surveillance, NBRC will at its own discretion reallocate an alternative authorised person/s. (Neither the authorised person/s or applicable responsible person shall be able to choose what (if any) alternative authorised person/s are assigned).

11.) For all property inspections NBRC will attempt to engage persons responsible for the management of the land (owners/lessees) in a positive and constructive manner and provide both opportunity and guidance for the responsible person/s to address any identified invasive species issues.

12.) NBRC authorised persons will preferentially attempt to enter identified properties with permission (and if possible participation) from the land owner/ lessee, but may enter the property (without a warrant) with:

37

DRAFT


o due efforts to contact/gain permission from the land owner/lessee, o appropriate property inspection lead times, o display of required identification, and o required advertising/publishing of the Biosecurity (Property Inspection)

Program.

13.) All vehicles brought to site and used as part of property inspections/surveillance programs shall be cleaned down for weed hygiene both prior to arrival and upon departure from a property. Otherwise should the land owner/lessee be participating and be prepared to use their own vehicle/s, then the inspection/surveillance can be conducted in the land owner/lessee’s vehicle or on foot.

14.) Authorised persons (LPO’s) operating in compliance with their legislated legal authority, NBRC’s Biosecurity Plan (when developed) and this procedure shall have the power to instruct others and carry out activities within the North Burnett region in line with their authority.

15.) Authorised person’s (LPO’s) and other NBRC personnel interacting in a professional capacity with members of the North Burnett region community shall document and record any instruction, correspondence and observations made whilst carrying out their duties.

16.) All non-trivial and non-routine instruction, correspondence, observations and activities encountered whilst on duty shall be brought to the prompt attention of the applicable person’s supervisor.

17.) All persons operating under this procedure shall comply with all legal instructions provided by their NBRC supervisor.

18.) Generally NBRC shall operate a 4 stage response to the detection/management of invasive species which is:

1. Courtesy Letter identifying the outcome of an initial property inspection/surveillance program.

2. Property Management Plan Request Letter identifying that formal corrective action/agreement is required to manage previously identified biosecurity risks that have not been adequately addressed.

3. Issuing of a Penalty Infringement Notice (PIN). 4. Completion of prevention and control activities chargeable to the

responsible person/s as prescribed through legislation, including charging interest for unpaid amounts.

Should the identified/suspected Biosecurity Matter relate to something that is “Prohibited Matter”, it will be immediately referred to Biosecurity Queensland for the required response.

38

DRAFT


19.) For areas with established populations of invasive species, the sequence of management priority is as follows:

a. Containment – Prevent the invasive species from spreading to other locations.

b. Control – Prevent the invasive species from further population increase within the existing infestation area.

c. Elimination/Eradication – Eliminate the invasive species population from the infested area.

The management objective of responses to invasive species that are wide spread/well established in an area is to contain and control the infestation with efforts to minimise impacts upon land productivity and the environment. However, a high priority/urgent response is required where populations of an invasive species are

a. not well established (insufficient time to propagate), b. generally low across the area, or c. previously not detected/known to exist in the area.

The management objective of responses to invasive species in low/no previous infestation areas is eradication.

LEGISLATIVE PRINCIPLES:

1.) In order to be able to apply and enforce NBRC’s Biosecurity (Property Inspection) Program, NBRC is required to authorise the biosecurity program by resolution under s232 of the Act, as either a surveillance program and/or a prevention and control program.

2.) A “surveillance program” (as defined under s233 of the Act) is a program

directed at any of the following—

(a)monitoring compliance with this Act in relation to a particular matter to which this Act applies; (b) confirming the presence, or finding out the extent of the presence, in the State or the parts of the State to which the program applies, of the biosecurity matter to which the program relates; (c) confirming the absence, in the State or the parts of the State to which the program applies, of the biosecurity matter to which the program relates; (d) monitoring the effects of measures taken in response to a biosecurity risk; (e) monitoring compliance with requirements about prohibited matter or restricted matter; (f) monitoring levels of biosecurity matter or levels of biosecurity matter in a carrier.

3.) A “prevention and control program” (as defined under s234 of the Act) is a

program directed at any of the following— (a) preventing the entry, establishment or spread of biosecurity matter in an

39

DRAFT


area that poses a significant biosecurity risk; (b) managing, reducing or eradicating any biosecurity matter in an area that

could pose a significant biosecurity risk.

4.) Any NBRC biosecurity program must be authorised in writing by resolution of the local government (s235 of the Act). However, a program authorisation for a prevention and control program may be made only if each relevant person for the program authorisation is satisfied— (a) there is, or is likely to be, prohibited matter in an area; or (b) there is in an area any biosecurity matter that poses or is likely to pose a significant biosecurity risk; or (c) measures are required to prevent the entry or establishment in an area of biosecurity matter that poses or is likely to pose a significant biosecurity risk; or (d) after consultation with an industry group or community, that measures carried out jointly with the interested entity are required to control biosecurity matter in an area that would have a significant effect on members of the interested entity.

Each relevant person for a program authorisation must ensure that each authorised officer who is proposed by the relevant person to act under a biosecurity program is informed of the contents of the program authorisation for the program.

Unless a formal arrangement/mechanism exists between NBRC and a neighbouring/adjoining authority, invasive species must only be managed under the biosecurity program and this procedure if they occur within the NBRC region. NBRC may however engage with neighbouring/adjoining authorities in the development of its Biosecurity Plan for due consideration of cross region pest management priorities.

5.) Under s239 of the Act NBRC must consult with the Chief Executive of the

Department of Agriculture and Fisheries before authorising a biosecurity program.

6.) Under s236 of the Act NBRC’s authorisation of its biosecurity program must

state each of the following— (a) the biosecurity matter to which the program relates; (b) the purpose of the program; (c) when the program starts; (d) the period over which the program is to be carried out; (e) for a biosecurity program that is a surveillance program—

(i) if the program is directed at monitoring compliance with this Act— (A) objective criteria for selecting places to be entered and inspected; and (B) a description of the area in which the places are situated; or

40

DRAFT


(ii) if the program is directed at deciding the presence or extent of the spread of biosecurity matter—

(A) the parts of the State to which it applies; and (B) if the program applies only to a particular type of place in the

State or a part of the State—a description of the type; (f) for a biosecurity program that is a prevention and control program—

(i) the nature and extent of the program, including— (A) the parts of the State to which it applies; and (B) if the program applies only to a particular type of place in the State or a part of the State—a description of the type; and

(ii) if a particular type of place is to be entered and inspected—a description of the type;

(g) the powers an authorised officer may exercise under the program, including the extent to which an authorised officer is to act under the program and the measures an authorised officer may take under the program; (h) the extent to which authorised persons may be directed to act under the program; (i) the obligations that may be imposed upon a person who is an occupier of a place to which the program applies.

The period over which a biosecurity program is to be carried out must be limited to the period reasonably necessary for achieving the program’s purpose.

7.) Under s237 of the Biosecurity Act 2014 an authorised officer may do the

following, at any reasonable time and at a place situated in an area to which a prevention and control program applies— (a) direct an occupier of the place to take reasonable steps within a reasonable period to remove or eradicate the biosecurity matter to which the program relates; (b) destroy the biosecurity matter to which the program relates, or a carrier of the biosecurity matter, if the authorised officer believes on reasonable grounds the biosecurity matter or carrier poses a significant biosecurity risk.

Despite subsection (a), the steps an occupier may be directed to take must be limited to those reasonably necessary for achieving the program’s purpose.

When giving a direction under subsection (1)(a), the authorised person must give the occupier an offence warning for the direction.

8.) Under s240 of the Biosecurity Act 2014 at least 14 days before a biosecurity

program starts, NBRC’s chief executive officer must give notice of the program— (a) to each department or government owned corporation responsible for land

in the area to which the biosecurity program relates, including by electronic means; and

(b) be published on NBRC’s website

41

DRAFT


The notice also may be published in another way the person giving the notice considers appropriate, including, for example, by radio or television in the area to which the biosecurity program applies. However, failure to give the notice to an entity, or to publish the notice, does not affect the validity of the biosecurity program.

The notice must state each of the following—

(a) the purpose and scope of the biosecurity program; (b) when the biosecurity program starts; (c) the period over which the biosecurity program is to be carried out; (d) NBRC’s name/logo (e) that copies of the biosecurity program are available for inspection or purchase at the offices, if any, in the area to which the program applies until the end of the program; and (f) the price of a copy of the biosecurity program;

The price of a copy of the authorised biosecurity program must be no more than the cost of having the copy available for purchase, and (if the copy is posted to the purchaser), the postage cost.

DEFINITIONS: Authorised Person: A person whom has been appointed (in writing) by NBRC’s Chief Executive Officer to perform functions under the Act within the region and is still engaged in this capacity. The functions and responsibilities of an authorised person under the legislation (s256 of the Act) include:

a.) To investigate, monitor and enforce compliance with the Act; b.) To investigate or monitor whether an occasion has arisen for the

exercise of powers under the Act; c.) To facilitate the exercise of powers under the Act; and d.) To help achieve the purposes of the Act by providing advice and

information on how the purposes may be achieved. Constructively: An effort to provide understanding and guidance in a positive manner that promotes and provides the land owner/lessee with a reasonable opportunity to correct any deficiencies or non-conformances. Biosecurity Plan: A legally required plan that a local government must have for the management of pests (invasive species) for its local government area. (s53 of the Act) The plan may include provision for each of the following— (a) achievable objectives under the plan; (b) strategies, activities and responsibilities for achieving the objectives; (c) strategies to inform the local community about the content of the plan and achievement of its objectives; (d) monitoring implementation of the plan and evaluating its effectiveness;

42

DRAFT


(e) other matters the local government considers appropriate for management of invasive biosecurity matter for its local government area. Property Management Plan: A NBRC specific, non-legally required management plan document/agreement that aims to constructively work with land owners/lessees with identified pest infestations/issues over a nominated period of time. The document defines agreed measures to be taken by the land owner/lessee over the nominated period of time to achieve an appropriate level of compliance with legal requirements and NBRC’s Biosecurity Plan (when developed). This document commits the land owner/lessee to the appropriate allocation of resources, time/effort and activities in order to achieve the required outcome. Failure to achieve/comply with the Property Management Plan could attract other corrective actions by NBRC. Prohibited Matter: Biosecurity matter that, for the time being, is established as prohibited matter under chapter 2 and/or schedule 1 of the Act. Generally, biosecurity matter satisfies the prohibited matter criteria if –

a.) the biosecurity matter is not currently present or known to be present in the State; and

b.) there are reasonable grounds to believe that if it did enter the State or part of the State the biosecurity matter may have a significant adverse effect on a biosecurity consideration (s20 of the Act).

Reasonable: Something a person knows/ought to know or have completed given their position, experience, activities, resources and responsibilities. It is a reasonable expectation that a land owner/lessee should be aware of appropriate land management techniques and responsibilities, including the need to manage legislated or other declared pests. Responsibility: A legal and moral obligation of a person whom either owns or manages land, or has some involvement/awareness of pests (biosecurity matter). The person has an obligation (a general biosecurity obligation) to take all reasonable and practical measures to prevent or minimise the biosecurity risk. Also, the person has an obligation (also a general biosecurity obligation)—

(a) to prevent or minimise adverse effects on a biosecurity consideration of the person’s dealing with the biosecurity matter or carrier or carrying out the activity; and (b) to minimise the likelihood of causing a biosecurity event, or to limit the consequences of a biosecurity event caused, by dealing with the biosecurity matter or carrier or carrying out the activity; and

(c) not to do or omit to do something if the person knows or ought reasonably to know that doing or omitting to do the thing may exacerbate the adverse effects, or potential adverse effects, of the biosecurity matter, carrier or activity on a biosecurity consideration (s23 of the Act).

43

Mailing Address: Street Address:

Telephone: Facsimile:

Email: Web: ABN:

PO Box 390, Gayndah Qld 4625 34-36 Capper Street, Gayndah Qld 4625 1300 696 272 (07) 4161 1425 [email protected] northburnett.qld.gov.au 23 439 388 197

Address all correspondence to the Chief Executive Officer

XXX 2016 Your Reference: Our Reference:

Dear RE: NORTH BURNETT BIOSECURITY PROGRAM COMPLIANCE – PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN The North Burnett Regional Council (NBRC) would like to thank you for your assistance and support in the ongoing management of “Biosecurity Risks” across the North Burnett Region. As you are aware, NBRC’s Authorised Persons – Land Protection Officers (LPO’s) have confirmed the presence of “Biosecurity Matter” (commonly known as pests) on your property, which requires your prompt attention. The following biosecurity risk/matter was confirmed on your property:

Eg Rubber vine (Cryptostegia grandiflora). All persons/entities have a “General Biosecurity Obligation” (GBO) under the Biosecurity Act 2014 to “take all reasonable and practical measures to prevent or minimise the biosecurity risk” associated with the potential or actual occurrence of biosecurity matter. This includes both if the person/entity “knows, or ought to know” or “not to do, or omit to do something”. A person/entity must exercise “due diligence” if they wish to demonstrate that they have met their GBO (s23 to s28 - Biosecurity Act 2014) As the owner/occupier of the land in question you are responsible for the effective management and control/eradication of this Biosecurity Matter. You are legally required to exercise “due diligence” in maintaining compliance with the Biosecurity Act 2014 and both NBRC’s Biosecurity Plan and Program. As part of NBRC’s ongoing efforts to engage and constructively work with the people of the North Burnett region, NBRC is willing to allow property owners/occupiers who have restricted biosecurity matter (or biosecurity risk) issues that are beyond their ability to immediately rectify, to enter into a formal corrective action plan known as a “Property Management Plan” (PMP). The property management plan mechanism is not a legal requirement and is only offered by NBRC to afford persons responsible for a property’s management (“responsible persons”) the opportunity to rectify the situation through an agreed, structured, prioritised, prescriptive and fixed time frame response. Failure to comply or accept this offer may result in NBRC taking further action such as:

o Further correspondence between NBRC and the responsible person/s. o Fines/fees and charges. o Completion of prevention and control activities chargeable to the responsible person/s as

prescribed through legislation, including charging interest for unpaid amounts. o Prosecution.

44

NBRC would like to recognise and thank-you for the efforts you have already made in relation to the Biosecurity Matter on the property, however NBRC also recognises the need for further measures to be taken. In progressing the matter, NBRC seeks your detailed proposal for appropriately rectifying the biosecurity risk/matter situation on the land you are responsible for. Your proposal (should it be accepted) will become the “Property Management Plan” (PMP), which you will be required to comply with in order to avoid further action by Council. Your proposal as a minimum should contain the following:

Maps of the property you are responsible for which detail: o Extent/location of each biosecurity risk/matter o Priorities for managing/eliminating the biosecurity risk/matter o Progressive actions and work extents/locations over the life of the PMP

Priorities – detail what you believe are the priorities for rectifying the situation over the life of the PMP

Actions – detail what you propose to do over the life of the PMP

Resources – detail what resources (financial, human, equipment, chemical etc) you propose to allocate to actions/priorities over the life of the PMP

Time frames – detail when you propose to complete the priorities/actions identified as part of the PMP. (Please note: The PMP must achieve the objective within a specified time frame. Non-prescriptive, open ended and/or ongoing proposals will not be accepted)

If you are able to immediately and appropriately manage/eliminate the biosecurity risks/matter from the property you are responsible for then there is no need for you to develop and/or agree to a PMP. The purpose of this initiative is to ensure biosecurity risks are adequately managed across the region including not harbouring pests and/or allowing them to spread to other properties across the region. This initiative also serves to help protect responsible persons from prosecution/costs by other property owners/occupiers associated with the spreading of biosecurity risks/matter to other properties. Please find attached a factsheet of the biosecurity risk/matter found on your property and further information about that species for your reference. Council’s Environmental Services Land Protection Officers are available to discuss and assist with any further issues you may have regarding biosecurity risks. Please do not hesitate to contact Council on 1300 696 272 with any queries you may have on this matter so we can endeavour to eradicate these pests from our naturally beautiful region. Yours sincerely Brendan Pearce General Manager Engineering and Environmental Services on behalf of MJP Pitt Chief Executive Officer ATTACHMENT

45

Standing Committee Meetings – Technical Services · Bancroft and Cania View to 3G capable units...

Documents

Transcript of Standing Committee Meetings – Technical Services · Bancroft and Cania View to 3G capable units...