Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

12
developing people, improving young lives developing people, improving young lives Development directorate Stakeholder mapping Spring 2007

Transcript of Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

Page 1: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

developing people, improving young lives   developing people, improving young lives  

Development directorate

Stakeholder mapping

Spring 2007

Page 2: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

2

Who typically gets involved?

Reference GroupEnsure that it works

Change TeamCome up with the

solution

SponsorsOwn the requirement

UsersReap the benefits

Page 3: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

3

Tools we could use: Stakeholder mapping

What is it?

• A graphical illustration of how your stakeholders are disposed towards your change project

• Helps you to identify who you need to influence and what action to take

When would you use it?

• Early in your project – at the Mobilise and Discover stages

• Revisit in later stages as you evaluate efforts to improve positive attitudes and engage stakeholders

Are there any rules?

• Never print or leave your map lying about – can be very sensitive!

Page 4: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

4

Mapping stakeholder dispositions (1)

Involvement

Against For

Page 5: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

5

Mapping stakeholder dispositions (2): examples

Involvement

Against For

The enemy; takingevery opportunityto undermine yourefforts

Change champion;takes personal responsibility for ensuring success

Fence sitter;not engaged;waiting to seehow it goes

The cynic; firescheap shots to testyour resolve

Willing helper;anxious to lenda hand

Page 6: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

6

Worked example: A school change initiative

Involvement

Against For+5-5

0

10

Deputy head

Headteacher

Admin 1

Part-time teacher

ParentsChair of

Governors

Governing body

SMT

Admin 2

Full-timeteaching

staff

LSA

Key: Size of circle = degree of influence on change

Page 7: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

7

Illustrating relationships

Involvement

Against For+5-5

0

10

Deputy head

Headteacher

Admin 1

Part-time teacher

ParentsChair of

Governors

Governing body

SMT

Admin 2

Full-timeteaching

staff

LSA

Key: Thickness of line = strength of relationship

Page 8: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

Active

Against For

Passive

Page 9: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

Active

Against For

Passive

The enemy; Takes every opportunityto undermine yourefforts

The lazy cynic; Fires cheap shots to testyour resolve

Fence sitter;Not engaged;waiting to seehow it goes

Willing helper;Anxious to lenda hand

Change champion;Takes personal responsibility for ensuring success

The talker;For the change but not willing to play a part

Page 10: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007

Active

Against For

Passive

Mike

Sally

David

Tom

Susan

Rob

Jeff

Bob

Lisa

KeyLarger the bubble = greater the influenceThickness of line = strength of relationshipBrown line = positive relationshipRed line = negative relationship

Rachael

Jane

Page 11: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007
Page 12: Stakeholder Mapping TDA Palette Spring 2007