STAFF REPORT SOUTH FLORIDA SHOOTING GROUNDS Revised Major ... · SOUTH FLORIDA SHOOTING GROUNDS...

20
MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAFF REPORT { A. Application Information SOUTH FLORIDA SHOOTING GROUNDS Revised Major Final Site Plan Applicant: South Florida Shooting Grounds, LLC Property Owner: South Florida Shooting Grounds, LLC Agent for the Applicant: The Milcor Group, Inc., Melissa G. Corbett, P.E. County Project Coordinator: Catherine Riiska, Principal Planner Growth Management Director: Nicki van Vonno, AICP Project Number: S188-007 Application Type and Number: D059 201600056 Report Number: 2017_0131_S188-007_DRT_Staff_FINAL.docx Application Received: 02/22/2016 Transmitted: 02/22/2016 Staff Report: 05/17/2016 Joint Workshop: 05/19/2016 Resubmittal Received: 07/26/2016 Transmitted: 07/28/2016 Staff Report: 01/31/2017 Joint Workshop: TBD B. Project description and analysis This is an application for a revised commercial, major development final site plan for an outdoor shooting range. The project site is a sub-portion of a parent parcel of approximately 630 acres located at 500 SW Long Drive, approximately 2.3 miles north of SW Martin Highway. The entire parcel has a designated future land use of Agricultural. The original development site of approximately 41.44 acres received approval of a zoning change from A-2 to AG-20A in 2006. The remainder of the parent parcel received approval of a zoning change from A-2 to AG-20A in 2007. The South Florida Shooting Grounds project received a final site plan approval on February 25, 2009. This application is a request to revise the approved plan to accommodate the addition of four cart barns, an observation tower, bunker and shade structures. The site is not located within an urban service district and is therefore currently serviced by a potable water well and septic systems. Included in this application is a request for a Certificate of Public Facilities Reservation.

Transcript of STAFF REPORT SOUTH FLORIDA SHOOTING GROUNDS Revised Major ... · SOUTH FLORIDA SHOOTING GROUNDS...

MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

STAFF REPORT

{

A. Application Information

SOUTH FLORIDA SHOOTING GROUNDS

Revised Major Final Site Plan

Applicant: South Florida Shooting Grounds, LLC

Property Owner: South Florida Shooting Grounds, LLC

Agent for the Applicant: The Milcor Group, Inc., Melissa G. Corbett, P.E.

County Project Coordinator: Catherine Riiska, Principal Planner

Growth Management Director: Nicki van Vonno, AICP

Project Number: S188-007

Application Type and Number: D059 201600056

Report Number: 2017_0131_S188-007_DRT_Staff_FINAL.docx

Application Received: 02/22/2016

Transmitted: 02/22/2016

Staff Report: 05/17/2016

Joint Workshop: 05/19/2016

Resubmittal Received: 07/26/2016

Transmitted: 07/28/2016

Staff Report: 01/31/2017

Joint Workshop: TBD

B. Project description and analysis

This is an application for a revised commercial, major development final site plan for an outdoor

shooting range. The project site is a sub-portion of a parent parcel of approximately 630 acres located at

500 SW Long Drive, approximately 2.3 miles north of SW Martin Highway. The entire parcel has a

designated future land use of Agricultural. The original development site of approximately 41.44 acres

received approval of a zoning change from A-2 to AG-20A in 2006. The remainder of the parent parcel

received approval of a zoning change from A-2 to AG-20A in 2007. The South Florida Shooting

Grounds project received a final site plan approval on February 25, 2009.

This application is a request to revise the approved plan to accommodate the addition of four cart barns,

an observation tower, bunker and shade structures. The site is not located within an urban service district

and is therefore currently serviced by a potable water well and septic systems. Included in this

application is a request for a Certificate of Public Facilities Reservation.

Development Review Staff Report

Page 2 of 20

C. Staff recommendation

The specific findings and conclusion of each review agency related to this request are identified in

Sections F through T of this report. The current review status for each agency is as follows:

Section Division or Department Reviewer Phone Assessment

F Comprehensive Plan Catherine Riiska 288-5667 Non-Comply

F ARDP Samantha Lovelady 288-5664 N/A

G Development Review Catherine Riiska 288-5667 Non-Comply

H Urban Design Santiago Abasolo 288-5485 N/A

H Community Redevelopment Santiago Abasolo 288-5485 N/A

I Property Management Colleen Holmes 288-5794 N/A

J Environmental Shawn McCarthy 288-5508 Comply

J Landscaping Karen Sjoholm 288-5909 Non-Comply

K Transportation Stephanie Molloy 223-4858 Non-Comply

L County Surveyor Michael O’Brien 288-5418 Comply

M Engineering Michelle Cullum 288-5512 Non-Comply

N Addressing Emily Kohler 288-5692 Comply

N Electronic File Submission Emily Kohler 288-5692 Comply

O Water and Wastewater James Christ 320-3034 Non-Comply

O Wellfields James Christ 320-3034 Comply

P Fire Prevention Doug Killane 288-5633 Comply

P Emergency Management Debra McCaughey 219-4942 N/A

Q ADA Judy Lamb 221-1396 Comply

R Health Department Todd Reinhold 221-4090 Review Pending

R School Board Garret Grabowski 223-3105 N/A

S County Attorney Krista Storey 288-5443 Review Ongoing

T Adequate Public Facilities Catherine Riiska 288-5667 Review Pending

D. Review Board action

This application requests approval of a revised final site plan for an outdoor shooting range, which is

classified as a commercial major development as set forth in Section 10.11.B.1., LDR, Martin County,

Fla. (2016). Pursuant to Sections 10.1.D., 10.4.A.1., and 10.5.A.1., LDR, Martin County, Fla. (2016),

applications for a major development which has not received master site plan approval shall be subject

to a review and recommendation of the Local Planning Agency (LPA) with final action to be determined

by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC). Both the LPA and BCC meetings shall be public

hearings in accordance with Section 10.7., LDR, Martin County, Fla. (2016).

E. Location and site information

Parcel number(s) and address:

04-38-39-000-000-0001.0-80000 500 SW Long Dr

Existing Zoning: A-2, Agricultural

Future land use: FLU-AG, Future Land Use Agricultural

Census tract: Not Applicable

Commission district: 5

Community redevelopment area: Not Applicable

Municipal service taxing unit: District 5

Development Review Staff Report

Page 3 of 20

Planning area: West County

Storm surge zone: Not Available

Taxing district: District F

Traffic analysis zone: 51

Figure 1: Location Map

Figure 2: Subject Site 2016 Aerial

Development Review Staff Report

Page 4 of 20

Adjacent existing or proposed development:

To the north: N/A (C-23)

To the south: Undeveloped

To the east: Agriculture

To the west: Undeveloped/Agriculture

Figure 3: Local 2016 Aerial

Zoning district designations of abutting properties:

To the north: N/A (C-23 Canal)

To the south: PC, Public Conservation

To the east: A-2, ,Agricultural

To the west: PC, Public Conservation

Figure 4: Zoning Map

Development Review Staff Report

Page 5 of 20

Future land use designations of abutting properties:

To the north: N/A (C-23 Canal)

To the south: Conservation

To the east: Agricultural

To the west: Conservation

Figure 5: Future Land Use Map

F. Determination of compliance with Comprehensive Growth Management Plan requirements -

Growth Management Department

Unresolved Issues:

Item #1:

Maximum Height

No land uses or development shall be more than 40 feet high. Building height shall be measured from

the average finished grade at the perimeter of the building, except in flood hazard areas. In flood hazard

areas building height shall be measured from the base flood elevation requirement for the lowest floor as

shown on the flood insurance rate map published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency

(FEMA). Building height shall be the difference between the finished grade or the base flood elevation

described above and either the highest point of the coping of a flat roof, the deck line of a mansard roof,

or the mean height level between eaves and ridge of gable, hip, and gambrel roofs. The mean height

level between the ridge and the eaves shall be determined on the highest section of roof. Limited

exceptions shall be allowed for structures such as church steeples, roof structures, utility poles, park

lighting, emergency structures, agricultural and industrial structures, and communications facilities as

detailed in Article 3, Section 3.14., Land Development Regulations, Martin County Code on August 13,

2013. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., CGMP POLICY 2.1A.1(3) (2016)

Pursuant to Section 3.12, LDR, Martin County, Fla. (2013), the maximum allowable height in the AG-

20A zoning district is thirty (30) feet.

Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:

Development Review Staff Report

Page 6 of 20

The methodology for determining the height of structures has changed via a revision to the

Comprehensive Growth Management Plan (CGMP), which is effective. Please see the attached Exhibit

1 for an excerpt of the current requirements. All existing structures that were developed in conformance

with the Final Site Plan approved in 2009 will not be required to utilize the new methodology. All

structures that are proposed, other than those shown on the 2009 approved site plan, must be identified

as proposed and may not exceed thirty (30) feet in height as measured using the current methodology.

1. Please revise the data tables for clarity:

a. Utilize names/labels for each building, or building type, consistent with the labeling

shown on the revised site plan.

b. All structures constructed in conformance with the 2009 approved site plan shall be

identified as 'existing'.

c. All structures not authorized by the 2009 development order and site plan shall be

identified as 'proposed' whether or not they have already been installed.

d. All observation towers must be included.

2. Please submit elevation drawings for all proposed permanent structures:

a. Depict NAVD ground elevations for the measurement starting point pursuant to Policy

2.1A.1(3), CGMP, Martin County, Fla. (2016) as provided in the attached Exhibit 1.

b. Any portions of any structures proposed to exceed the maximum allowable height must

be demonstrated to meet the exemption criteria pursuant to Section 3.14.B.5., LDR,

Martin County, Fla. (2005).

c. Please provide elevations for all other structures, installed and proposed to remain or

proposed to be installed, on the property in association with the commercial use.

G. Determination of compliance with land use, site design standards, zoning, and procedural

requirements - Growth Management Department

Unresolved Issues:

Item #1:

Site Plan Compliance-GMD

Development activity shall be in compliance with the development order at all times. Failure to comply

with a development order or unauthorized development activity may result in the suspension of the

current development order, and the cessation of county processing of all applications for development

on the subject property and any associated phases or termination of the development order. MARTIN

COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTION 10.8.A. (2016)

Site plans shall be required for minor and major development proposals in accordance with the

provisions of this section in order to ensure that the proposed development complies with the

requirements of the Comprehensive Plan, the LDR and the Code. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR

SECTION 10.11.A.1. (2016)

The discharge of firearms shall be conducted only within areas specifically designated for such use on

an approved site plan. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTION 3.99.1.A (2008)

Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:

There appear to be additional firing positions and associated structures, including shelters and

observation towers, located outside the shooting areas designated on the approved site plan:

Development Review Staff Report

Page 7 of 20

1. Please submit a revised site plan encompassing the developable area to show:

a. All existing firing positions

b. All proposed firing positions

c. All existing structures

d. All proposed structures

e. All stabilized cart paths

2. Please revise the data table to reflect the existing and proposed conditions within the revised

project area for all required development standards associated with the AG-20A zoning district

and Agricultural Future Land Use designation.

3. Please dimension the distance of all firing positions from the parcel boundaries to demonstrate

compliance with Section 3.99.1.B., LDR, Martin County, Fla. (2008).

4. Please provide the allowable and proposed building coverages in the data table. All structures,

including observation towers and buildings, must be included.

5. Please label all structures and provide dimensions. Unique dimensions should be provided where

necessary (e.g. each different style of observation tower); or, in the case of a standard structure

utilized throughout the site, a single typical and a total count for the cumulative coverage

proposed (e.g. the dimensions, elevation and number of shade structures, if all the same).

6. Please provide for a fence or wall, a minimum of six feet in height with warning signs of at least

one square foot each for every 100 linear feet for the perimeter of the shooting range activity for

compliance with Section 3.99.1.C., LDR, Martin County, Fla. (2008).

7. Please provide the records documenting the facility's conformance with the Best Management

Practices (BMPs) identified within the approved Hazardous Waste Management Plan (OR Bk

2401 Pgs 872-875) to demonstrate compliance with Section 3.99.1.E and 3.99.1.F., LDR, Martin

County, Fla. (2008).

8. Please review the Hazardous Waste Management Plan that is tailored to the use and conditions

of the site. The original 2008 Plan identified multiple general BMPs that were identified as

potentially to be utilized dependent upon site specific conditions yet to be determined. If

necessary, please update the Plan based upon the current state and federal guidelines and

incorporate the applicant’s experience with the historic and ongoing operations and the

expansion of the use.

9. Please review the range design to ensure it complies with the Hazardous Waste Management

Plan and FDEP Guidelines.

Item #2:

Legal Description Of The Property

A legal description of the property that is the subject of this application must be provided. MARTIN

COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTION 10.2.B (2016)

Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:

Please provide a revised legal description consistent with the developable area of the site. See Item #1,

Section G.

Item #3:

Boundary & Topographic Surveys

Provide recent boundary and topographic surveys of all properties that are the subject of this application.

MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTION 10.2.B (2016)

Development Review Staff Report

Page 8 of 20

Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:

Please provide a revised survey consistent with the project boundaries of the developable area. See Item

#1, Section G.

Item #4:

Acreage Of Site

Indicate the gross acreage of the project on the site plan, measured in square feet and acres. MARTIN

COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTION 10.2.B (2016)

Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:

Please provide a revised gross acreage that encompasses the developable portion of the property. See

Item #1, Section G. The project site appears be the entire tract (approx. 630 acres). Please clearly

identify those areas that are in Agricultural use. The remainder of the site utilized for the shooting

courses and stations (approx. 350 acres) must be identified as the outdoor shooting range area, which

appears to be the developable portion and project boundary.

Item #5:

Notice 1,000 Feet

Provide a current list of the names and addresses all property owners within 1,000 feet of the boundaries

of the property that is the subject of this application and is located outside the Primary Urban Service

District. Include in the list any condominium and homeowner associations and the name and address of

each property owner in each association. (Section 10.6.E.1)

Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:

Please submit a revised list that encompasses all owners located within 1,000 feet of the subject parcel

boundaries, i.e. property lines.

Item #6:

Posted Property Notarized Certification

No later than ten (10) days after a complete application is filed (when a letter indicating the application

is sufficient has been released), the applicant is to post the property with a waterproofed sign entitled

'Notice of Development Application.' The applicant is to provide to the Growth Management

Department a signed, notarized certification that the property has been posted with the appropriate

notice and within the prescribed time period. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTION 10.6.B (2016)

If the property does not abut a public right-of-way, signs shall be placed at the nearest public right-of-

way with an indication of the location of the subject property. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR

SECTION 10.6.B.2. (2016)

Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:

The posted notice sign does not appear to be located on a public right-of-way. Please relocate the sign as

appropriate and provide photographs and a location map to demonstrate compliance with Section

10.6.B., LDR, Martin County, Fla. (2016).

Development Review Staff Report

Page 9 of 20

Item #7:

Structure Setbacks

Show existing and proposed structures and their required setbacks measured in feet from the closest

point of each to the nearest property line on the site plan. Minimum setbacks for the AG-20A zoning

district for all structures are fifty (50) feet. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTION 3.12 (2013)

Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:

Please see Item 1 Section G.

Item #8:

Parking Calculations

Show the calculation for parking on the site plan in the required table of existing and proposed uses.

(Section 4.6; Section 10.2.B, LDR)

Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:

Please provide revised parking calculations consistent with the project. See Item 1, Section G. Please

include applicable loading spaces for the ancillary uses (e.g. retail sales, lounge etc.).

Item #9:

Vehicle Access From Adjacent Streets

Show all vehicle access to the property and provide the distance and accessway dimensions in feet, on

the site plan. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTION 10.2.B (2016)

Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:

Thank you for labeling the width of the access drive from SW Long Drive to the range area. As

previously requested please provide the distance of the accessway.

Item #10:

Site Plan

A complete site plan is required as part of the application pursuant to Section 10.2.B.5., LDR, Martin

County, Fla.

Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:

Please see prior comments.

Additional Information:

Information #1:

Site Clearing

No land clearing is authorized prior to the mandatory pre-construction meeting for the project. Property

corners and preservation areas shall be located by a licensed land surveyor and clearly marked in the

field prior to the pre-construction meeting. Authorization for clearing to install erosion control devices

and preserve barricades will be granted at the pre-construction meeting. No additional land clearing

Development Review Staff Report

Page 10 of 20

shall commence until a satisfactory inspection of the required control structures and barricades has been

obtained. Authorization for the relocation of gopher tortoises within the development, as provided for on

state agency permits, may be granted by the Growth Management Department upon review of required

permit materials. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTION 4.3.7. (2016)

Information #2:

The applicant has elected Option 2, regarding Agency permit submittal for a consistency review after

project approval. Prior to scheduling the mandatory pre-construction meeting for construction

commencement authorization, all applicable local, state, and federal approved permits are to be

submitted for review by the County Administrator with remittance of a $600.00 review fee. If an

application is made to any permitting agency for a modification to a permit that was required to be

issued prior to final site plan approval, the application for the permit modification must be submitted

concurrently to Martin County. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTION 10.9.a. (2016)

Information #3:

Timetable Of Development - Final

The timetable of development for final site plans require all permits to be obtained within one year of

approval and require all construction to be completed within two years of approval. MARTIN

COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTIONS 10.1. AND 5.32. (2016)

H. Determination of compliance with the urban design and community redevelopment requirements

– Community Development Department

Commercial Design

The proposed project is not located within the General Commercial, Limited Commercial, Commercial

Office/Residential or Waterfront Commercial Future Land Use Designations. Therefore, the

Commercial Design reviewer was not required to review this application. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA.,

LDR SECTION 4.871.B. (2016)

Community Redevelopment Area

The proposed project is not located within a Community Redevelopment Area. Therefore, the

Community Redevelopment Area reviewer was not required to review this application. MARTIN

COUNTY, FLA., LDR ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 6 (2016)

I. Determination of compliance with the property management requirements – Engineering

Department

No dedication of additional right of way is required or proposed by the Applicant pursuant to the

Roadway Classifications set forth in Section 4.843.B, Land Development Regulations, Martin County,

Fla. (2001), which includes Table 4.19.1 that lists the minimum right-of-way requirements. Therefore,

the Applicant is not required to submit due diligence materials for review by Real Property

Management.

Development Review Staff Report

Page 11 of 20

J. Determination of compliance with environmental and landscaping requirements - Growth

Management Department

Environmental

Unresolved Issues:

Item #1:

General Compliance-Environmental

As a result of new information and a site inspection conducted on November 2, 2016, additional

environmental information may be required and further review may be needed prior to staff giving a

'comply' determination under the environmental review. Please see Section G, Item #1, of this staff

report for further information.

Additional Information:

Information #1:

County environmental staff conducted an inspection on June 29, 2016 and found portions of the wetland

buffer adjacent to the proposed shotgun range had been cleared of native vegetation. In order to resolve

this environmental compliance issue, the county requested a restoration plan and the applicant agreed to

restore the area prior to issuance of this development order. The restoration plan has been approved by

the county and the restoration work will be completed prior to issuance. For record keeping purposes, an

electronic copy of the plan can be found under the correspondence project folder for this DO.

Landscape

Unresolved Issues:

Item #1:

Landscape Tabular Data

Landscape plans shall include a table which lists the gross and net acreage, acreage of development and

preservation areas, number of trees and tree clusters to be protected within the developed area and

within perimeter areas, and square footage of vehicular use areas (Ref. Section 4.662.A.10, LDR).

Interior and perimeter vehicular use areas should be quantified separately in the table. Tabular data shall

also indicate a calculation of the minimum total number of trees and shrubs required to be planted based

upon the proposed developed area and separately based upon quantities required to meet the vehicular

use area planting requirements and any required bufferyard requirements.

Please also include the following:

a. Document compliance with the requirement that twenty (20) percent of the total

developed area shall be landscaped.

b. Document that nonresidential developments provide at least one tree per 2,500 square

feet of site area.

Service function areas including solid waste collection and mechanical equipment requiring screening

shall be summarized in a table to identify equipment and the type of screening proposed.

Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:

Verify that prior landscaping installed, as documented on the As-built Landscape Plan dated 12/6/10 has

Development Review Staff Report

Page 12 of 20

established successfully and that existing landscaping is in compliance with that plan and meets

requirements of the current landscape code contained in Martin County., LDR [Article 4, Division 15]

[2013].

9.9.16. Certification of existing landscaping has been provided in the response letter stating that

landscaping as detailed on the 12/6/10 as-built plan has been verified and is in compliance with the

Code. However, the Existing Plant List on Sheet 6 is not consistent with the Plant List on the 2010 As-

built, The proposed plant list is also not consistent with quantities labeled on the plan. Please explain the

discrepancies.

In addition there is a note on the landscape plan that states there are no landscape requirements in

Agricultural Land Use. That is only correct if the land use is an agricultural use. While shooting ranges

are permitted on a parcel zoned as agricultural, shooting ranges are considered to be a Commercial and

Business Use. See Section 3.11 Table 3.11.1, Code of Ordinances, Martin County, FL (2013) This

parcel must be developed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Divisions 3 and 4 and all

other applicable requirements of this Article and the LDR.

The Landscape Tabular data indicates that Bahia sod is a native grass: Bahia is not a species native to

Florida or North America, please correct this designation. The existing plant list indicates that Hamelia

patens 'Compacta' is a native species; the variety 'Compacta' is also not a native Florida species but is an

introduced species generally believed to have come from South Africa or southern Mexico. In the

interest of accuracy please correct this designation.

K. Determination of compliance with transportation requirements - Engineering Department

Unresolved Issues:

Item #1:

Traffic Impact

1. Distribution map must show distribution of trips. The study network will be illustrated in both

tabular and map formats, and clearly show the percentage of project traffic of the level of service

capacity up to and including the link where the project traffic falls below the two percent

threshold. The map or maps will illustrate the project location, existing and proposed traffic

control devices, existing and proposed ingress and egress locations for the project, existing and

proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and existing and proposed public transportation

services and facilities on the study network. [Martin County, Fla., LDR Article 5, Division 3,

Section 5.64.C.7 (2009)]

2. Per Section 5.64.C.5, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. 2009, if no links are

impacted at the two percent or greater level, the analysis will consider the first directly accessed

road on the major road network.

3. Exhibit D should reference PM traffic, not AM.

4. The trips generated by this project are greater than 1% of the generalized service capacity of the

first directly assessed road on the major road network; therefore, the project cannot be deemed

deminimis.

L. Determination of compliance with county surveyor - Engineering Department

Findings of Compliance:

Development Review Staff Report

Page 13 of 20

The Survey Division of the Engineering Department has reviewed the boundary and topographic

surveys submitted with the application. The Survey Division finds that both surveys are in conformance

with the requirements of Article 4 of the LDRs, the standards and practices listed in Chapter 472,

Florida Statutes, and other applicable requirements as identified in Chapter 177, Florida Statutes.

[Martin County, Fla., LDR Article 4; Chs. 472 and 177, Fla. Stat.]

M. Determination of compliance with engineering, storm water and flood management requirements

- Engineering Department

Unresolved Issues:

Item #1:

Stormwater Mgmt Post-Development

1. The amount of water quality provided is not represented accurately on the Post Development

Basin Boundary Map. Referring to the stage storage calculations, the available storage at 29.20

NAVD is 12.07ac-ft. The site provides 12.07 ac-ft in the dry detention areas and the green space

areas prior to discharging. Revise the Basin Summary on the Post Development Basin Boundary

Map to reflect 12.07 ac-ft of water quality provided.

2. Due to the existing 3 inch bleeders at elevation 26.56' NAVD, the dry detention areas will

recover half the water quality treatment volume within 24 hours and 5 days. As previously

stated in the staff report dated 5/17/2016, the narrative in the Drainage Calculations does not

accurately reflect the ICPR modeling results. The stormwater system recovers half the treatment

volume at hour 98.51 (4.10 days from the start of the storm event). Revise your narrative to

reflect the ICPR results.

Item #2:

Stormwater Mgmt Construction Plans

1. As previously requested in the staff report dated 5/17/16, remove references to The City of Stuart

Minimum Design and Construction Standards in the construction notes (sheet 5, note 5)

2. It appears the existing "8 inch Weep Hole" will need to be reconstructed to the previously

permitted 3 inch bleeder. The Engineer shall field verify and provide a detail as necessary.

Remove the note " Field Verify and Reconstruct as Necessary."

N. Determination of compliance with addressing and electronic file submittal requirements – Growth

Management and Information Technology Departments

Addressing

Findings of Compliance:

The application has been reviewed for compliance with Division 17, Addressing, of the Martin County

Land Development Regulations. Staff finds that the proposed site plan / plat complies with applicable

addressing regulations. All street name SW Long Dr is in compliance. It was named and approved

during original final plan approval. It meets all street naming LDRs. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR

[4.767] ([2014]).

Development Review Staff Report

Page 14 of 20

Electronic File Submittal

Findings of Compliance:

The Information Services Department staff has reviewed the electronic file submittal and finds it in

compliance with the applicable county requirements.

Both AutoCAD site plan and boundary survey were received and found to be in compliance with

Section 10.2.B.5, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. ([2016])

Both AutoCAD site plan and boundary survey were in State Plane coordinates and found to be in

compliance with Section 10.2.B.5, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. ([2016])

The AutoCAD boundary survey was received and found to be in compliance with Section 10.2.B.5,

Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. ([2016])

O. Determination of compliance with utilities requirements - Utilities Department

Water and Wastewater Service

Unresolved Issues:

Please see Items #1 and #17, Section G of this report.

Item #1:

Submit MCHD Permit-Septic Sys

The applicant must submit a copy of the Martin County Health Department Permit for the onsite sewage

disposal system prior any final approval.

Item #2:

Utilities Compliance

Water and wastewater is limited to 2,000 gallons per day of wastewater per [Martin County, Fla. Comp

Plan, Section 10.2.B(2)(2016)] and 2000 gallons of water per [Martin County, Fla. LDR , Article 4,

Division 6, Subdivision2, 4.228.B (2016):

10.2.B(2) Nonresidential use of on-site sewage treatment and disposal systems. On-site sewage

treatment and disposal systems can serve nonresidential uses on existing lots when a regional sewage

system is not available. All systems shall be consistent with the policies in Section 10.4. No on-site

sewage treatment and disposal system shall exceed a flow of 2,000 gpd per lot. A use must be deemed

by the Health Department not to constitute a high expected failure rate. On-site sewage treatment and

disposal systems shall not be allowed for the treatment and disposal of industrial, toxic or hazardous

wastes.

Martin County Land Development Code:

4.228.B.

The use of individual potable water treatment systems shall be limited to the following:

1. Nonresidential uses outside the primary urban service district, provided that such use generates a

potable water demand at total site build-out of no more than 2,000 gallons per day and water treatment is

mandated by governing agencies. The nonresidential potable water demand shall be calculated in

Development Review Staff Report

Page 15 of 20

accordance with the following:

a. Standards for on-site sewage disposal systems, section 10D-6.048, table II, of the State of

Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, F.A.C. ch. 10D-6, as may be amended

from time to time; or

b. Documented potable water consumption volumes generated by similar development(s).

Wellfield and Groundwater Protection

Findings of Compliance:

The application has been reviewed for compliance under the Wellfield Protection Program. The

reviewer finds the application in compliance with the Wellfield Protection and Groundwater Protection

Ordinances.

The proposed changes to the approved site plan does not intensify the use of the land for utilities(no

existing irrigation will be modified pg 96 of applicants submittal package), therefore the County's

concern for level of service and concurrency for water and wastewater is eliminated. [ref. Code, LDR,

s.5.32.B.3.f. Code, LDR, Art.5, Div.2]

P. Determination of compliance with fire prevention and emergency management requirements –

Fire Rescue Department

Fire Prevention

Findings of Compliance:

The Fire Prevention Bureau finds this submittal to be in compliance with the applicable provisions

governing construction and life safety standards. This occupancy shall comply with all applicable

provisions of governing codes whether implied or not in this review, in addition to all previous

requirements of prior reviews.

Resubmittal displays private storage building under the threshold of 2500 square feet, eliminating the

requirement for fire sprinkler protection.

Additional Information:

Information #1:

The following fire suppression water flow is the minimum for industrial/warehouse/storage use:

18.4.5.2 Buildings Other Than One- and Two-Family Dwellings. The minimum fire flow and flow

duration for buildings other than one- and two-family dwellings shall be as specified in NFPA 1[2012

edition] Table 18.4.5.1.2.

Additional water flow may be required to supplement fire sprinkler systems or to support other

hazardous uses. The developer is responsible to meet any additional flow requirements beyond that

which is within the capacity of the utility provider [NFPA 1].

Emergency Management

The proposed project is non-residential and is not anticipated to impact Martin County Emergency

Management resources. Therefore, the Emergency Management department was not required to review

this application. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTION 10.1.F. (2016)

Development Review Staff Report

Page 16 of 20

Q. Determination of compliance with Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements - General

Services Department

Findings of Compliance:

The General Services Department staff has reviewed the application and finds it in compliance with the

applicable Americans with Disability Act requirements.

R. Determination of compliance with Martin County Health Department and Martin County School

Board

Martin County Health Department

Review Pending:

Please see Section G, Item #1.

Please contact Nick Clifton or Todd Reinhold at 772-221-4090 with any questions.

Martin County School Board

The applicant has indicated that this project is for a non-residential use, pursuant to Section 10.1.F.,

LDR, Martin County, Fla. (2016). Therefore, the Martin County School Board was not required to

review this application for the purposes of school capacity concurrency.

S. Determination of compliance with legal requirements - County Attorney's Office

Review Ongoing

T. Determination of compliance with the adequate public facilities requirements - responsible

departments

The following is a summary of the review for compliance with the standards contained in Article 5.7.D

of the Adequate Public Facilities LDR for a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities Reservation.

Potable water facilities service provider – On-site Well

Source - Environmental Services Department

Reference - see Section O of this staff report

Sanitary sewer facilities service provider – On-site Septic

Source -Environmental Services Department

Reference - see Section O of this staff report

Solid waste facilities

Findings – In Place

Source - Growth Management Department

Stormwater management facilities

Findings - Pending

Source - Engineering Department

Reference - see Section N of this staff report

Development Review Staff Report

Page 17 of 20

Community park facilities

Findings – N/A

Source - Growth Management Department

Roads facilities

Findings - Pending

Source - Engineering Department

Reference - see Section M of this staff report

Mass transit facilities

Findings – N/A

Source - Engineering Department

Reference - see Section L of this staff report

Public safety facilities

Findings - Pending

Source - Growth Management Department

Reference - see Section P of this staff report

A timetable for completion consistent with the valid duration of the development is to be included in the

Certificate of Public Facilities Reservation. The development encompassed by Reservation Certificate

must be completed within the timetable specified for the type of development.

U. Post-approval requirements

Approval of the development order is conditioned upon the applicant’s submittal of all required

documents, executed where appropriate, to the Growth Management Department (GMD), including

unpaid fees, within sixty (60) days of the final action granting approval.

Item #1:

Post Approval Requirements List: After approval the applicant will receive a letter and a Post Approval

Requirements List that identifies the documents and fees required. The applicant will return the Post

Approval Requirements List along with the required documents in a packet with the documents arranged

in the order shown on the list.

Item #2:

Post Approval Fees: The applicant is required to pay all remaining fees when submitting the post

approval packet. If an extension is granted, the fees must be paid within 60 days from the date of the

development order. Checks should be made payable to Martin County Board of County Commissioners.

Item #3:

Post Approval Impact Fees: Impact fees must be paid after the development order has been approved.

Submit a check made payable to Martin County Board of County Commissioners within 60 days of

project approval.

Development Review Staff Report

Page 18 of 20

Item #4:

Recording Costs: The applicant is responsible for all recording costs. The Growth Management

Department will calculate the recording costs and contact the applicant with the payment amount

required. Checks should be made payable to the Martin County Clerk of Court.

Item #5:

One (1) copy of the recorded warranty deed if a property title transfer has occurred since the site plan

approval. If there has not been a property title transfer since the approval, provide a letter stating that no

title transfer has occurred.

Item #6:

Original and one (1) copy of the current Unity of Title in standard County format if a property title

transfer has occurred since the site plan approval. If there has not been a property title transfer since the

approval, provide a letter stating so that no transfer has occurred.

Item #7:

Ten (10) 24" x 36" copies of the approved construction plans signed and sealed by the Engineer of

Record licensed in the State of Florida. Fold to 8 by 12 inches.

Item #8:

Ten (10) copies 24" x 36" of the approved site plan and one (1) reduced copy 8 1/2" x 11".

Item #9:

Original approved site plan on Mylar or other plastic, stable material.

Item #10:

Ten (10) 24" x 36" copies of the approved landscape plan signed and sealed by a landscape architect

licensed in the State of Florida.

Item #11:

One (1) digital copy of site plan in AutoCAD 2006 or 2007 drawing format (.dwg). The digital version

of the site plan must match the hardcopy version as submitted.

Item #12:

Original of the construction schedule.

Item #13:

Original of the Engineer's Design Certification, on the County format which is available on the Martin

County website, signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record licensed in the State of Florida.

Development Review Staff Report

Page 19 of 20

Item #14:

Original and one (1) copy or two (2) copies of the executed and signed Water and Wastewater Service

Agreement with Martin County Regional Utilities and one (1) copy of the payment receipt for Capital

Facility Charge (CFC) and engineering and recording fees.

V. Local, State, and Federal Permits

Approval of the development order is conditioned upon the applicant's submittal of all required

applicable Local, State, and Federal Permits, to the Growth Management Department (GMD), prior

to the commencement of any construction. An additional review fee will be required for Martin County

to verify that the permits are consistent with the approved development order.

Item #1:

STORMWATER MGMT PERMITS

The following permits must be submitted prior to scheduling a Pre-Construction meeting:

1. South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Environmental Resource Permit (ERP)

2. South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Dewatering Permit

3. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) Nationwide

4. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Drainage Connection Permit

W. Fees

Public advertising fees for the development order will be determined and billed subsequent to the public

hearing. Fees for this application are calculated as follows:

Fee type: Fee amount: Fee payment: Balance:

Application review fees: $9,127.00 $9,127.00 $0.00

Advertising fees*: TBD

Recording fees**: TBD

Mandatory impact fees: TBD

Non-mandatory impact fees: TBD

* Advertising fees will be determined once the ads have been placed and billed to the County.

** Recording fees will be identified on the post approval checklist.

X. General application information

Applicant: South Florida Shooting Grounds, LLC

Shapiro Pertnoy Companies

3222-C Commerce Place

West Palm Beach, FL 33407

561-793-5852

Agent: The Milcor Group, Inc.

Melissa G. Corbett, P.E.

Development Review Staff Report

Page 20 of 20

6525 South Kanner Highway #236

Stuart, FL 34997

772-223-8850

Y. Acronyms

ADA ............. Americans with Disability Act

AHJ .............. Authority Having Jurisdiction

ARDP ........... Active Residential Development Preference

BCC.............. Board of County Commissioners

CGMP .......... Comprehensive Growth Management Plan

CIE ............... Capital Improvements Element

CIP ............... Capital Improvements Plan

FACBC ........ Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction

FDEP ............ Florida Department of Environmental Protection

FDOT ........... Florida Department of Transportation

LDR.............. Land Development Regulations

LPA .............. Local Planning Agency

MCC ............. Martin County Code

MCHD.......... Martin County Health Department

NFPA ........... National Fire Protection Association

SFWMD ....... South Florida Water Management District

W/WWSA .... Water/Waste Water Service Agreement

Z. Attachments