STAFF REPORT SAILFISH MARINA STEALTH COMMUNICATIONS TOWER REVISED MAJOR … · 2014. 5. 30. ·...

MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

STAFF REPORT

{

A. Application Information

SAILFISH MARINA STEALTH COMMUNICATIONS TOWER REVISED MAJOR MASTER AND FINAL

Applicant: Bayley Products, Inc. Property Owner: Bayley Products, Inc. Agent for the Applicant: Larry Crary, Crary Buchanan County Project Coordinator: Deanna Freeman, Senior Planner Growth Management Director: Nicki van Vonno, AICP (Recused) Assistant County Administrator: Roger Baltz Project Number: S242-003 Application Type and Number: D056 201400027 Report Number: 2014_0407_S242-003_Bayley Products Inc_StRpt Application Received: 02/04/2014 Transmitted: 02/14/2014 Staff Report Draft: 04/07/2014 Report Release Joint Workshop 05/29/2014

(Staff report has been on hold as per applicant/agent instruction to allow them time to work with third parties. Received applicant/agent request to issue the report 5-29-2014).

B. Project description and analysis This is a request for revised Major Master and Final Site Plan approval to construct a one hundred twenty (120') foot tall stealth telecommunications facility at Sailfish Marina. The property is located at 3585 SE St Lucie Boulevard, south of Sandspirit Park in in a suburban area of eastern Martin County. The property has a Future Land Use of Marine Waterfront Commercial and the current zoning is R-3A, Liberal Multiple -Family District, which is a Category C zoning district. The applicant has requested a zoning change to WRC, Waterfront Resort Commercial, Category ‘A’ zoning district, to achieve consistency between the land use and zoning designation. In addition, any proposal on property identified as a Marine Service Area is required to demonstrate compliance with Policy 4.13A.8. (4) of the CGMP. The request for a zoning change is being reviewed concurrently with the proposed revisions to the master/final site plan to accommodate the tower. The proposal site includes an approximately 73' by 33' lease parcel area where a tower compound will be constructed. An interior area, approximately 35' by 25' in size, will also be utilized for the placement of ground based telecommunications equipment. The approximately 2.17 acre Parent Tract is occupied by Sailfish Marina, with uses including gasoline and diesel fuel dispensers, a tackle shop store, boat maintenance facility, docks and various offices. The surrounding area includes a commercial boat

Development Review Staff Report

of 16

storage facility to the north, Mariner Cay single family residential subdivision to the south, Manatee Pocket to the east, and the Yacht & Country Club of Stuart residential subdivision to the west. Access to the site is along an existing paved area, situated southeasterly from SE St. Lucie Boulevard, directly opposite SE Long Avenue intersection. Proposed utilities required to accommodate the stealth column will parallel the northeastern boundary to the site location. The proposed wireless telecommunication tower proposal has been reviewed against Division 18 of Article 4, Martin County Land Development Regulations. The proposed stealth tower has been designed to have the appearance of a single tapered pole with no external appurtenances, and will resemble a sailboat mast in an existing marina environment. The exterior will be white in color and internally house the related transmission cables and antennas. The accessory ground equipment associated with the proposed tower will be housed within an existing building situated adjacent to the stealth column. In the event that the tower were to collapse, the tower has been designed to collapse downwards rather than over to the side. Ector Engineers have provided structural calculations and analysis and designed the tower as per Florida Building Codes, including withstanding up to 145 mph basic wind. The proposed tower has been designed to accommodate up to four service providers as a colocation arrangement. Existing towers within AT&T’s defined search area were discounted due to insufficient height or absence thereof. The proposed facility to be located at Sailfish Marina is considered necessary by AT&T to accommodate planned equipment to function reasonably. Propagation maps have been provided to attempt to illustrate the existing hole in coverage and capacity and how the tower will improve service within the area if approved. As per the requirements of Article 4, Division 18, the applicant has also provided correspondence from the FAA with a determination of no hazard to air navigation. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the property and FDEP Self Certification for a Stormwater Management System have also been included in the submittal packet. In addition to photo simulations illustrating the location of the proposed stealth tower on the property and as it would be viewed from the surrounding area. Members of the public have provided Staff with copies of several documents which they believe are relevant to the allowable uses on the property. Those documents are: 1) a 1985 Circuit Court Order and attached 1984 Settlement Agreement, and a 1988 Circuit Order issued in reference to Case Nos. 81-1181 CA and 84-398 CA; and 2) a copy of a 1991 Settlement Agreement in reference to Case No. 88-82 CA . The documents are currently under review by Staff. In addition, Staff has asked the applicant to review the documents and provide its assessment regarding the applicability of the documents to the proposed project. C. Staff recommendation The specific findings and conclusion of each review agency related to this request are identified in Sections F through T of this report. The current review status for each agency is as follows:

Section Division or Department Reviewer Phone Assessment F Comprehensive Plan Deanna Freeman 219-4923 Non-Comply F ARDP Samantha Lovelady 288-5664 N/A G Development Review Deanna Freeman 219-4923 Non-Comply H Urban Design Edward Erfurt 288-5908 N/A H Community Redevelopment Edward Erfurt 288-5908 N/A I Property Management Jeffrey Dougherty 288-5793 N/A J Environmental Shawn McCarthy 288-5508 N/A


of 16

J Landscaping Darryl DeLeeuw 221-1317 Non-Comply K Transportation Bonnie Pointer 288-5927 Comply L County Surveyor Michael O’Brien 288-5418 N/A M Engineering Aaron Stanton 288-5512 Comply N Addressing Emily Kohler 288-5692 Comply N Electronic File Submission Emily Kohler 288-5692 Non-Comply O Water and Wastewater James Christ 320-3034 Comply O Wellfields James Christ 320-3034 Comply P Fire Prevention Doug Killane 288-5633 Comply P Emergency Management Martha Beaudoin 219-4941 N/A Q ADA Bob Steiner 221-1396 N/A R Health Department Robert Washam 221-4090 N/A R School Board Boyd Lawrence 219-1200 N/A S County Attorney Krista Storey 288-5443 N/A T Adequate Public Facilities Deanna Freeman 219-4923 Comply

D. Review Board action Review and final action of the proposed revision to the approved Master/Final site plan is required by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) as an advertised public hearing. E. Location and site information Parcel number(s) and address: 52-38-41-000-000-0003.1-80000 3585 SE St Lucie Blvd Existing Zoning: R-3A, Liberal Multi-Family Future land use: FLU-CW, Future Land Use Commercial Waterfront Census tract: 0013 Tract Commission district: 2 Community redevelopment area: Not Applicable Municipal service taxing unit: District 2 Planning area: Pt Salerno / 76 Corr Storm surge zone: Category 1 Surge Zone Taxing district: District E Traffic analysis zone: 25


of 16

Current use of the subject site and surrounding uses:

Subject Site: Commercial Marina North: Commercial Marina South: Mariner Cay Residential Units East: Manatee Pocket West: SE St Lucie Blvd Yacht & Country Club of Stuart Residential Units


of 16

Current Zoning of the Property and surrounding area


of 16

Photo Simulation of the Proposed Tower

F. Determination of compliance with Comprehensive Growth Management Plan requirements -

Growth Management Department The zoning on the subject property must be consistent with the future land use designation. Where inconsistencies exist, a zoning change is required to an appropriate zoning district prior to any site plan approval. The zoning change is a mandatory requirement to be achieved prior to approval of the proposed revisions to the major master/final site plan. In addition, any proposal on property identified as a Marine Service Area, is required to consider the requirements of Policy 4.13A.8. (4). G. Determination of compliance with land use, site design standards, zoning, and procedural

requirements - Growth Management Department Findings of Compliance: Code provisions are in place to assess a wireless telecommunications facility, as is included in Article 4, Division 18 of the Martin County Land Development Regulations (LDR). With the exception of the unresolved issues detailed as follows and the need for a mandatory zoning change, the applicant has demonstrated through the materials provided, compliance with Article 4, Division 18 of the LDR. Unresolved Issues: Item #1: Site Plan - A complete site plan is required as part of the application. [Section 10.2.B, LDR]


of 16

Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: The site plan title pane is required to be amended to read ‘Revised Master/Final Site Plan’. Section 4.797.B. 4. requires the tower not be artificially lighted except as may be required by Federal or state regulation. Please confirm that the proposal will meet this section of the code and include notation on the revised master/final site plan. Section 4.797.B.6. requires the main access gate to the tower shall have affixed to it a sign not to exceed two feet by three feet in size which displays the owner's and/or permittee's name and an emergency telephone number. Please include notation on the revised master/final site plan to show compliance with the code. Item # 2: Height of the tower. Section 4.799 makes provision for the maximum height a tower may be constructed. The proposed 120’ telecommunications tower has been designed to accommodate a column at the maximum height available. Please provide additional propagation maps and a statement demonstrating what coverage may be achieved if the tower height was to be reduced. In that statement please confirm the lowest height the tower may be while achieving the improved coverage and capacity needs of the service provider for this area of Martin County. Although letters are no longer required from other service providers to demonstrated the applicant’s intent to co-locate, an indication of who may be seeking to utilize the proposed tower may be beneficial in addressing the requirement for a 120’ high tower. Item # 3: Propagation maps and technical justification. As per Section 4.794.D. of the LDR, the applicant is required to provide documentation of the infeasibility of tower co-location. The results of the propagation study, as were provided by AT&T as part of the submittal packet, do not correctly depict the 'coverage after site turn up'. The applicant is required to address this error and provide a statement describing the specific existing developed areas of Martin County that the proposed tower will improve. In addition, please provide a more detailed description of the reasoned justification for discounting any existing telecommunication towers. Item # 4: Third party legal agreement. Staff requires a summary as part of the resubmittal packet of communication with third parties and the current status pertaining to the legal agreement in place between residents at Mariner Cay. Additional Information: Information #1: The application documents that the tower is stealth and that the requirements set

forth in subsections 4.798.A. and 4.798.B. are not applicable. Information # 2: The application for a WTCF or tower includes documentation received from the

Emergency Management Director that the proposal shall not interfere with any public safety telecommunication facility, as per Section 4.800.A. of the LDR.

Information # 3: The application materials demonstrate that the tower shall be painted or have a

non-contrasting finish that minimizes the visibility of the facility from public view as per the requirements of Section 4.797.B.5. LDR.

Information # 4: The site plan demonstrates that the tower height has been measured from the


of 16

vertical distance from the base elevation of the tower site prior to construction to the highest point of the tower, including all antennas and other attachments except lightning rods [Section 4.799.A. LDR].

Information # 5: The timetable of development for the final site plan requires all permits to be obtained within one year of approval and all construction to be completed within two years of approval [Section 10.1 and 5.32. LDR].

Information # 6: The tower has been designed to have the appearance of a single tapered pole with

no external appurtenances, and will resemble a sailboat mast in an existing marina environment. The exterior will be white in color and internally house the related transmission cables and antennas. The accessory ground equipment associated with the proposed tower will be housed within an existing building situated adjacent to the stealth column.

H. Determination of compliance with the urban design and community redevelopment requirements

– Community Development Department The proposal site is not located within the CRA. I. Determination of compliance with the property management requirements – Engineering

Department N/A J. Determination of compliance with environmental and landscaping requirements - Growth

Management Department Landscape Unresolved Issues: Item #1: Standard Application Requirements The deficiencies noted in this section need to be addressed by the applicant with revised plans and documentation. To ensure a successful review, the following shall be provided with your resubmittal information: Resubmit a revised landscape plan showing the dates and notes on all revised plans to be resubmitted. Plans should be provided with "call-out" revision clouds/notes to identify areas that have been modified from the original submittal. A landscape plan is required with this application. The landscape plans must be prepared and sealed by a qualified professional and include all information required for submittal as specified in Section. Item #2: Landscape Tabular Data Identify proposed FL native plant species in the Landscape Tabular Data and demonstrate that at least 75% of required shrubs provided are native.


of 16

Irrigated and non-irrigated turf areas shall be quantified and identified on the landscape plan. Item #3: General Landscape Design Standards Please demonstrate compliance with the following general landscape requirements on the provided plans: Mulch material to a minimum compacted depth of three inches is provided for all planting areas when used to supplement ground cover. Cypress mulch may not be used as a mulching material. (Section 4.663.C., LDR) The following statements are required to be included on the landscape plan provided:

• The use of cypress mulch is prohibited in all landscaped areas. • No use shall be made of, and no development activity shall be permitted in, land use buffers and

perimeter landscape areas, except for: Planting material approved as part of the landscape plan. Completely underground utilities and essential, specifically approved, overhead or aboveground utilities which cross these areas and do not interfere with the mature growth of required plant material.

Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: Use of Cypress Mulch is prohibited. Please revise and add required notes to plan. Item #4: Landscape Material Standards-General Please demonstrate compliance with the following requirements (Section 4.664, LDR): At least 75 percent of all required landscaping, by category, in the form of trees and shrubs shall consist of native vegetation. Identify the spread and proposed plant spacing for required shrubs. Shrubs with 15 to 23 inches of spread shall be planted on three-foot centers; shrubs with greater than 23 inches of spread shall be planted on five-foot centers. In no event shall spacing exceed five feet on center, nor shall plants be closer than two feet to the edge of any pavement. Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: Please revise plans to utilize native shrub material. Item #5: Landscape Protection And Maintenance Please add the following notes regarding landscape maintenance to the plans provided [Section 4.665, LDR]:

• Protection of required landscaping.

• Encroachment into required bufferyards and landscaped areas by vehicles, boats, mobile homes


of 16

or trailers shall not be permitted, and required landscaped areas shall not be used for the storage or sale of materials or products or the parking of vehicles and equipment.

Maintenance of required landscaping.

• Required landscaping shall be maintained so as to at all times present a healthy, neat and orderly appearance, free of refuse and debris. If vegetation which is required to be planted dies it shall be replaced with equivalent vegetation. All trees for which credit was awarded and which subsequently die, shall be replaced by the requisite number of living trees according to the standards established in the Martin County Landscape Code.

• All landscaping shall be maintained free from disease, pests, weeds and litter. Maintenance shall

include weeding, watering, fertilizing, pruning, mowing, edging, mulching or other maintenance, as needed and in accordance with acceptable horticultural practices. Perpetual maintenance shall be provided to prohibit the reestablishment of harmful exotic species within landscaping and preservation areas.

• Regular landscape maintenance shall be provided for repair or replacement, where necessary, of

any screening or buffering required as shown on this plan. Regular landscape maintenance shall be provided for the repair or replacement of required walls, fences or structures to a structurally sound condition as shown on this plan.

Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: Please add the notation to the landscape plan. Item #6: Turfgrass And Groundcover Please provide that the ground area within required landscaped areas which is not dedicated to trees, vegetation or landscape barriers shall be appropriately landscaped and present a finished appearance and reasonably complete coverage upon planting, in accordance with the following (ref. Section 4.664.E., LDR): Irrigated turfgrass areas shall be consolidated and limited to those areas on the site that receive pedestrian traffic, provide for recreation use, provide cover for on-site sewage disposal systems, or provide soil erosion control such as on slopes or in swales; and where turfgrass is used as a design unifier or other similar practical use. Turf areas shall be quantified and identified on the landscape plan. Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: Comment was made that shrubs are to be watered in by contractor until established. However sod is specified with no indication of longterm watering and maintenance. Please specify type of sod and plans for care if no irrigation is being proposed. K. Determination of compliance with transportation requirements - Engineering Department Findings of Compliance: The Traffic Division of the Engineering Department finds this application in compliance.


of 16

Compliance with Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance: This application satisfies the Adequate Public Facilities Standard; it has a De Minimus impact (an impact that would not affect more than one percent of the maximum volume at the adopted level of service of the accepted road facility) (Article 5, Division 1, Section 5.3). L. Determination of compliance with county surveyor - Engineering Department N/A M. Determination of compliance with engineering, storm water and flood management requirements

- Engineering Department Unresolved Issues: Item #1: Stormwater Mgmt Submitted Materials The following items were not submitted in accordance with the referenced section of the Martin County Stormwater Management and Flood Protection Standards for Design and Review:

i) Provide a topographic survey of the site area to be altered, dated within the last six months.

ii) Provide the wet season water table (WSWT) and documentation to corroborate. Item #2: Stormwater Mgmt Pre-Development The soil study of Martin County lists this area as Arents soil, not Paola or St. Lucie sands. Please revise the soil classification in the stormwater report. Provide the water quality treatment volume for the proposed impervious area and show it is contained within the master system for the marina or show a separate system to contain this volume within the construction site. This volume is computed as 3" over the impervious area increase multiplied by a safety factor depending on the type of system. See Section 4.386.I for more information on calculating this volume. Additional Information: Information #1: Local adoption of the FEMA Flood (FIRM) Maps in the federally mandated North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) is forthcoming. Following adoption of the new maps, projects will be required to be prepared in the applicable NAVD88 vertical datum.


of 16

N. Determination of compliance with addressing and electronic file submittal requirements – Growth Management and Information Technology Departments

Addressing

Findings of Compliance: The application has been reviewed for compliance with Division 17, Addressing, of the Martin County Land Development Regulations. Staff finds that the proposed site plan / plat complies with applicable addressing regulations.

Electronic File Submittal Unresolved Issues: Item #1: Elec File State Plane Coordinates The site plan shall be based upon and consistent with a boundary survey prepared by a licensed Florida professional surveyor and mapper within 180 days of initial site plan submittal. The boundary survey and site plan shall be based on the Florida State Plane Coordinate System, NAD83/90 as adjusted, with units in US survey feet. Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: The AutoCAD site plan was not set in state plan coordinates. It fell 150 miles north west of the actual location. O. Determination of compliance with utilities requirements - Utilities Department

Water and Wastewater Service Findings of Compliance: This development application has been reviewed for compliance with applicable statutes and ordinances and the reviewer finds it in compliance with Martin County's requirements for water and wastewater level of service.

Wellfield and Groundwater Protection Findings of Compliance: The application has been reviewed for compliance under the Wellfield Protection Program. The reviewer finds the application in compliance with the Wellfield Protection and Groundwater Protection Ordinances.


of 16

P. Determination of compliance with fire prevention and emergency management requirements – Fire Rescue Department

Fire Prevention Findings of Compliance: The Fire Prevention Bureau finds this submittal to be in compliance with the applicable provisions governing construction and life safety standards. This occupancy shall comply with all applicable provisions of governing codes whether implied or not in this review, in addition to all previous requirements of prior reviews. A 10 lb. fire extinuisher will be required within the gated compound. Additional Information: Information #1: Martin County Code of Laws and Ordinances, Section 79.121, adopts NFPA 1 and NFPA 101 as the county's fire prevention code. The Code is to prescribe minimum requirements necessary to establish a reasonable level of fire and life safety and property protection from the hazards created by fire, explosion, and dangerous conditions. This is in accordance with Chapter 633, F.S. All construction, including, but not limited to, fire sprinklers, fire alarms and fire suppression systems, shall be subject to these codes. All documents including specifications and hydraulic calculations are required at the time of the application for a building permit for the property that is the subject of this application for site plan approval. Information #2: The AHJ shall have the authority to require an access box(es) to be installed in an accessible location where access to or within a structure or area is difficult because of security. [NFPA 118.2.2.1] Martin County utilizes and requires the Knox access system. You may contact www.knoxbox.com to order the system. Q. Determination of compliance with Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements - General

Services Department N/A R. Determination of compliance with Martin County Health Department and Martin County School

Board N/A S. Determination of compliance with legal requirements - County Attorney's Office The County Attorney’s Office review remains pending until BCC action has been made through the Public Hearing process. They continue to support the development review staff in their review and processing of the applicant’s request to develop the property.


of 16

T. Determination of compliance with the adequate public facilities requirements - responsible departments

The following is a summary of the review for compliance with the standards contained in Article 5.7.D of the Adequate Public Facilities LDR for a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities Reservation. Potable water facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.a, LDR) Service provider - Martin County Findings - Comply Source - Utilities and Solid Waste Department Reference - see Section O of this staff report Sanitary sewer facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.b, LDR) Service provider - Martin County Findings - Comply Source - Utilities and Solid Waste Department Reference - see Section O of this staff report Solid waste facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.c, LDR) Findings - Comply Source - Growth Management Department Stormwater management facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.d, LDR) Findings - Pending Source - Engineering Department Reference - see Section M of this staff report Community park facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.e, LDR) Findings - Exempt Source - Growth Management Department Roads facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.f, LDR) Findings – Comply Source - Engineering Department Reference - see Section K of this staff report Public safety facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.h, LDR) Findings - Comply Source - Growth Management Department Reference - see Section P of this staff report Public school facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.i, LDR) Findings – N/A Source - Growth Management Department Reference - see Section R of this staff report A timetable for completion consistent with the valid duration of the development is to be included in the Certificate of Public Facilities Reservation. The development encompassed by Reservation Certificate must be completed within the timetable specified for the type of development. U. Post-approval requirements Approval of the development order is conditioned upon the applicant’s submittal of all required documents, executed where appropriate, to the Growth Management Department (GMD), including unpaid fees, within sixty (60) days of the final action granting approval.


of 16

Item #1: Post Approval Requirements List: After approval the applicant will receive a letter and a Post Approval Requirements List that identifies the documents and fees required. The applicant will return the Post Approval Requirements List along with the required documents in a packet with the documents arranged in the order shown on the list.

Item #2: Post Approval Fees: The applicant is required to pay all remaining fees when submitting

the post approval packet. If an extension is granted, the fees must be paid within 60 days from the date of the development order. Checks should be made payable to Martin County Board of County Commissioners.

Item #3: Post Approval Impact Fees: Impact fees must be paid after the development order has

been approved. Submit a check made payable to Martin County Board of County Commissioners within 60 days of project approval.

Item #4: Recording Costs: The applicant is responsible for all recording costs. The Growth

Management Department will calculate the recording costs and contact the applicant with the payment amount required. Checks should be made payable to the Martin County Clerk of Court.

Item #5: One (1) copy of the recorded warranty deed if a property title transfer has occurred since

the site plan approval. If there has not been a property title transfer since the approval, provide a letter stating that no title transfer has occurred.

Item #6: Original and one (1) copy of the current Unity of Title in standard County format if a

property title transfer has occurred since the site plan approval. If there has not been a property title transfer since the approval, provide a letter stating so that no transfer has occurred.

Item #7: Ten (10) 24" x 36" copies of the approved construction plans signed and sealed by the

Engineer of Record licensed in the State of Florida. Fold to 8 by 12 inches. Item #8: Original approved site plan on Mylar or other plastic, stable material. Item #9: One (1) digital copy of site plan in AutoCad 2006 or 2007 drawing format (.dwg). The

digital version of the site plan must match the hardcopy version as submitted. Item #10: Original of the construction schedule. Item #11: Original of the Engineer's Design Certification, on the County format which is available

on the Martin County website, signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record licensed in the State of Florida.

Item #12: A hauling fee of $0.21 per cubic yard of materail being hauled from the site in the

amount of $ 7.35 shall be paid within sixty (60) calendar days of the project approval. V. Local, State, and Federal Permits All the applicable Local, State and Federal Permits have been issued.


of 16

W. Fees Public advertising fees for the development order will be determined and billed subsequent to the public hearing. Fees for this application are calculated as follows: Fee type: Fee amount: Fee payment: Balance: Application review fees: $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $0.00 Advertising fees*: TBD Recording fees**: TBD Mandatory impact fees: TBD Non-mandatory impact fees: TBD * Advertising fees will be determined once the ads have been placed and billed to the County. ** Recording fees will be identified on the post approval checklist. X. General application information Applicant: Bayley Products Inc Butch Bayley 3565 SE St Lucie Blvd Stuart, FL 34997-5433 Agent: Larry Crary Crary Buchanan 759 S Federal Hwy,

Suite 106, Stuart, FL 34996

Y. Acronyms ADA ............. Americans with Disability Act AHJ .............. Authority Having Jurisdiction ARDP ........... Active Residential Development Preference BCC.............. Board of County Commissioners CGMP .......... Comprehensive Growth Management Plan CIE ............... Capital Improvements Element CIP ............... Capital Improvements Plan FACBC ........ Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction FDEP ............ Florida Department of Environmental Protection FDOT ........... Florida Department of Transportation LDR.............. Land Development Regulations LPA .............. Local Planning Agency MCC ............. Martin County Code MCHD.......... Martin County Health Department NFPA ........... National Fire Protection Association SFWMD ....... South Florida Water Management District W/WWSA .... Water/Waste Water Service Agreement Z. Attachments

STAFF REPORT SAILFISH MARINA STEALTH COMMUNICATIONS TOWER REVISED MAJOR … · 2014. 5. 30. ·...

Documents

Transcript of STAFF REPORT SAILFISH MARINA STEALTH COMMUNICATIONS TOWER REVISED MAJOR … · 2014. 5. 30. ·...